Phase I/II study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for treatment of metastatic adenocarcinoma

Leucovorin enhances the cytotoxicity of fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with colorectal cancer and may increase the efficacy of combination chemotherapy regimens containing 5-FU. To determine the maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU with leucovorin for use in combination with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, we conducted a phase I/II trial in 20 patients. The doses of leucovorin (200 mg/m2 on days 1-5), cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 on day 1), and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 on day 1) were held constant, while the dose of 5-FU was escalated in cohorts of patients beginning at 150 mg/m2 on days 1-5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Significant mucositis, diarrhea, and myelosuppression were infrequently observed in patients receiving up to 250 mg/m2 5-FU on days 1-5. In contrast, at a dose of 300 mg/m2 on days 1-5, three of six patients had granulocyte count nadirs of less than 500/microL during the first cycle of therapy, and two of these three had platelet counts of less than 25,000/microL. In addition, two patients treated at this dose had significant mucosal toxic effects, and three had insufficient recovery to permit a second course by day 22. Among 14 patients with assessable breast cancer, there were one complete and nine partial responses (response rate 71%). Leucovorin modulation of 5-FU can be safely incorporated into combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin and provides a highly active regimen for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Further study will be required to determine whether the addition of leucovorin significantly enhances the activity of this regimen.     

Vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer: a randomized trial of the Piedmont Oncology Association

Eighty-one evaluable patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either vincristine 1 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day one and cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 orally days 3-6 (VAC); or cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2, methotrexate 20 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m2 (CMF) intravenously, all on day 1. Courses of each of the above regimens were repeated every three weeks. Twenty-one of 45 patients (47%) on VAC and seven of 44 patients (16%) on CMF had complete or partial response (P less than 0.05). The duration of response was six months for CMF and nine months for VAC. Hematologic toxicity was minimal for both groups but three patients receiving VAC developed cardiac toxicity. Overall survival projections at this time indicate no differences between the VAC or CMF treated patients.     

The potential for oral combination chemotherapy of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, a 5-FU prodrug, and cyclophosphamide for metastatic breast cancer

Preclinical studies have demonstrated the synergistic anti-tumour activity of combination therapy with the oral cytostatics, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) and cyclophosphamide (CPA), in human breast cancer xenograft models. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this oral combination chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In all, 101 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in the study, and the data for 94 eligible patients of these were evaluated. The patients received twice daily oral combinations of 5'-DFUR (1200 mg/body/day) and CPA (100 mg/body/day) for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period. After a median of 19 treatment cycles (range 1-66 cycles), 16 patients (17.0%) had a complete response, and 40 patients (42.6%) had partial responses. The response rate was 59.6% (95% CI, 49.0-69.6%). The median time to progression and overall survival times were 11.7 and 40.3 months, respectively. The toxicity was mild and tolerable, and the related grade 3/4 clinical adverse effects consisted of haematological toxicity in 21 patients (22%) and nonhaematological toxicity in five patients (5%). These results suggest that the oral combination chemotherapy of 5'-DFUR and CPA has low toxicity and is a novel, very convenient and effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer.     

Comparison of chemotherapy with chemohormonal therapy as first-line therapy for metastatic, hormone-sensitive breast cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Although hormonal therapy represents standard therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive disease, many patients receive initial chemotherapy because of the location, bulk, or aggressiveness of their disease. It is uncertain whether simultaneous hormonal therapy provides additional benefit compared with chemotherapy alone. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E3186 was initiated to explore this question. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1988 and December 1992, 231 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive or ER-unknown metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil ?CAF) or chemohormonal therapy (CAF plus tamoxifen and Halotestin ?fluoxymesterone; Pharmacia-Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI ?CAFTH) as front-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients who experienced a complete response to induction therapy either received or did not receive maintenance cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, prednisone, and TH as a secondary randomization. RESULTS: The response rates (complete response and partial response) of patients who received CAF and CAFTH were similar (69.2% v 68.9%, respectively; P =.99). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was slightly longer for patients who received chemohormonal therapy compared with chemotherapy alone patients (13.4 months v 10.3 months, respectively; P =.087), and TTF was significantly longer in ER-positive compared with ER-negative patients (17.4 months v 10.3 months, respectively; P =.048). However, ER status had no effect on overall survival (30.0 months for CAF v 29.3 months for CAFTH). CONCLUSION: In patients with potentially hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer, chemohormonal therapy prolongs TTF for ER-positive patients without improving overall survival.     

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and infusional 5-fluorouracil (infusional CMF) in metastatic breast cancer.

Bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a phase-specific drug with a short plasma half-life that is used in combination with bolus cyclophosphamide and methotrexate in the treatment of breast cancer. The efficacy of 5-FU can be improved by continuous intravenous infusion using portable infusion pumps (infusional 5-FU). Infusional 5-FU, 200 mg m(-2) day(-1), in combination with standard doses of bolus cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, was evaluated in a phase I/II dose-finding study. The cyclophosphamide and methotrexate were administered in 28-day cycles as follows: cohort 1, cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1; cohort 2, cyclophosphamide 400 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1; cohort 3, cyclophosphamide 480 mg (m-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1; cohort 4, cyclophosphamide 480 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8. Median overall survival was 10 months (range 3-21 months). Objective tumour responses were seen in 9 of 25 patients (36%, 95% CI 18-58%), including 3 of 13 patients (23%) previously treated for metastatic disease. Cohorts 1 and 4 proved to be too toxic, with five of six patients in cohort 1 and three of four in cohort 4 developing grade III/IV neutropenia. The dose intensity of cyclophosphamide achieved was as follows: cohort 1, 82%; cohort 2, 86%; cohort 3, 97%; cohort 4, 90%. Infusional 5-FU can be administered safely and is effective in combination with cyclophosphamide 480 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1, in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.     

Phase I/II trial of gemcitabine plus cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma previously treated with taxanes

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of infusional gemcitabine given in conjunction with intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide, and to determine whether the regimen produced a response rate of at least 40% in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have been previously treated with taxanes. Patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) i.v. followed immediately by gemcitabine (100, 150, or 200 mg/m2) given as a 24-hour infusion (every 3 weeks) using an accelerated dose-escalation schema. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a neutrophil nadir < 500/microL, platelet nadir < 50,000/microL, or > or = grade 2 nonhematologic toxicity (> or = grade 3 toxicity during the standard dose-escalation portion of the study). Twelve patients received a total of 32 cycles of therapy. The MTD of gemcitabine was 150 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities at 200 mg/m2 included neutropenia and mucositis. One patient with lymphangitic lung metastases had a partial response (8%; 95% confidence intervals: 0%, 23%). This patient developed grade 4 transaminase and total bilirubin elevation that occurred after the sixth cycle of therapy. The study was terminated due to an insufficient number of responses. The MTD of gemcitabine given as a 24-hour infusion is 150 mg/m2 when used in conjunction with cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. This regimen is not likely to produce more than a 40% response rate in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes.     

High-dose chemotherapy with reinfusion of purged autologous bone marrow following dose-intense induction as initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer

We assessed the toxicity and efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy consolidation with reinfusion of purged autologous bone marrow in women with metastatic breast cancer responding to a dose-intense outpatient regimen. Thirty women with hormone-unresponsive metastatic breast cancer, previously untreated with adjuvant doxorubicin or with any chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, vincristine, and leucovorin for 16 weeks. Twenty-four patients responded to therapy; 8 showed a complete response, and 16 showed a partial response. These patients proceeded to the next phase of the protocol, ie, marrow harvest and treatment with 6000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide and 800 mg/m2 thiotepa given over 4 days. Harvested marrow was purged with 100 micrograms/mL 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, and all patients engrafted satisfactorily. The predominant side effects were myelosuppressive and gastrointestinal, and there were no deaths from toxic effects. Three of the 16 patients who showed a partial response after the outpatient phase of treatment achieved a complete response after high-dose therapy. The partial response seen in two more patients converted to a complete response at all sites except bone. The median time to disease progression for all patients in this study was 13 months, and the median survival was 22 months. Four of the original 30 patients remained without disease progression a median of 27 months from entry into the study. This study indicates that this dose-intense regimen can be safely administered, even with the use of purged marrow, with an acceptable toxicity profile. This approach results in a high response rate in women with metastatic breast cancer and could form the basis for a regimen to be tested in the high-risk adjuvant setting.     

Prospective evaluation of concurrent paclitaxel and radiation therapy after adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for Stage II or III breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of concurrent radiation therapy and paclitaxel-based adjuvant chemotherapy, given either weekly or every 3 weeks, after adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: After definitive breast surgery and AC chemotherapy, 40 patients with operable Stage II or III breast cancer received protocol-based treatment with concurrent paclitaxel and radiation therapy. Paclitaxel was evaluated on 2 schedules, with treatment given either weeklyx12 weeks (60 mg/m2), or every 3 weeksx4 cycles (135-175 mg/m2). Radiation fields and schedules were determined by the patient's surgery and pathology. The tolerability of concurrent therapy was evaluated in cohorts of 8 patients as a phase I study. RESULTS: Weekly paclitaxel treatment at 60 mg/m2 per week with concurrent radiation led to dose-limiting toxicity in 4 of 16 patients (25%), including 3 who developed pneumonitis (either Grade 2 [1 patient] or Grade 3 [2 patients]) requiring steroids. Efforts to eliminate this toxicity in combination with weekly paclitaxel through treatment scheduling and CT-based radiotherapy simulation were not successful. By contrast, dose-limiting toxicity was not encountered among patients receiving concurrent radiation with paclitaxel given every 3 weeks at 135-175 mg/m2. However, Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis not requiring steroid therapy was seen in 2 of 24 patients (8%) treated in such a fashion. Excessive radiation dermatitis was not observed with either paclitaxel schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent treatment with weekly paclitaxel and radiation therapy is not feasible after adjuvant AC chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Concurrent treatment using a less frequent paclitaxel dosing schedule may be possible, but caution is warranted in light of the apparent possibility of pulmonary injury.     

'Neo-FAC' (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) for poor-prognosis stage IV breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Phase II Study.

The authors report a phase II pilot investigation in the Southwest Oncology Group examining a combination of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) incorporating modulated 5-FU in patients with poor-prognosis stage IV breast cancer. Patients with poor-prognosis stage IV breast cancer were treated with this "neo-FAC" as front-line therapy. The regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil by continuous ambulatory infusion pump at 200 mg/m2/day for 42 days, repeated at 56-day intervals; doxorubicin at 20 mg/m2/week intravenously to a maximum cumulative total dose (including adjuvant therapy, if any) of 500 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/day taken orally; methotrexate 15 mg/m2/week intravenously beginning 1 week after termination of doxorubicin; and oral prednisone decreasing from 60 mg/day on a tapering schedule for a total of 7 weeks of treatment. Treatment was continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. Twenty-four patients were accrued to this study. Of these, two were ineligible, and the remaining 22 were evaluable for response. Ten patients experienced grade 3 toxicity, and six had grade 4. There were no treatment-associated deaths. Best responses were a complete response in one patient (5%) and partial responses in 6, for an overall response rate of 32% (7/22 evaluable patients). Overall survival in five pilot studies in the Southwest Oncology Group in this poor-prognosis population are relatively superimposable. The present regimen, with its relatively poor outcome and the expense and inconvenience of administering chemotherapy by ambulatory infusion pump, will not be pursued further.     

Low dose chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CAMF) versus sequential cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and adriamycin.

Seventy-eight advanced breast cancer patients with hormone-resistant disease or visceral metastases were randomized to receive either of two low dose regimens consisting of cyclophosphamide (C), methotrexate (M), 5-fluorouracil (F), and Adriamycin (A) as their initial chemotherapy. One group was treated with CAMF, and the other with CMF until progression, followed by A (CMF leads to A). C was given at 50 mg/m2, po, days 1-14; M at 20 mg/m2, F at 300 mg/m2, and A at 20 mg/m2, iv, days 1 and 8 of each 28-day cycle. The response rates for CAMF vs. CMF did not differ significantly (complete and partial responses-62% vs. 49%; stabilizations-23% vs. 31%). Responses by site of metasis, median times to progression and median survivals were similar for both groups. Poor and good risk partial responders had similar survivals. Twelve percent of CMF patients treated with Adriamycin at the time of progression had partial responses with an associated improved survival. Since CMF is as effective as CAMF, but has less toxicity, low dose therapy with CMF is more acceptable than CAMF as an initial chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer. Adriamycin may be reserved for subsequent regression induction.     

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate,5-fluorouracil, alternating with adriamycin and mitomycin C in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study

To explore the clinical applicability of the Goldie and Coldman hypothesis, we treated 28 patients with metastatic breast cancer with alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy. The patients received cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, methotrexate, 40 mg/m2, alternated every three weeks with adriamycin, 60 mg/m2, and mitomycin C, 10 mg/m2. Only one patient had previously received palliative chemotherapy. Six patients had received adjuvant CMF, and 17 patients had been pretreated with endocrine therapy (13 for advanced disease, 4 as adjuvant). Fourteen patients had bone involvement, and 10 had visceral metastases. A mean of 12 cycles was given to 24 evaluable patients. The objective response rate was 67%: 11 patients (46%) achieved complete and 5 (21%) partial remission. Response rate in soft tissues was 83.3%, in bone 50%, in liver 100%, and in lung 80%. The median duration of response was 14 months, with 7 patients still in remission. No life-threatening toxicity was observed. Our preliminary results support the validity of this approach and the efficacy of this combination chemotherapy. A large-scale randomized study is warranted.     

Highly efficacious nontoxic preclinical treatment for advanced metastatic breast cancer using combination oral UFT-cyclophosphamide metronomic chemotherapy

Metronomic antiangiogenic chemotherapy, the prolonged administration of relatively low drug doses, at close regular intervals with no significant breaks, has been mainly studied at the preclinical level using single chemotherapeutic drugs, frequently in combination with a targeted antiangiogenic drug, and almost always evaluated on primary localized tumors. We tested a "doublet" combination metronomic chemotherapy treatment using two oral drugs, UFT, a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug administered by gavage, and cyclophosphamide, for efficacy and toxicity in a new mouse model of advanced, terminal, metastatic human breast cancer. The optimal biological dose of each drug was first determined by effects on levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells as a surrogate marker for angiogenesis, which was assessed to be 15 mg/kg for UFT and 20 mg/kg for cyclophosphamide. A combination treatment was then evaluated in mice with advanced metastatic disease using a serially selected metastatic variant of the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer-cell line, 231/LM2-4. UFT or cyclophosphamide treatment showed only very modest survival advantages whereas a combination of the two resulted in a remarkable prolongation of survival, with no evidence of overt toxicity despite 140 days of continuous therapy, such that a significant proportion of mice survived for over a year. In contrast, this striking therapeutic effect of the combination treatment was not observed when tested on primary orthotopic tumors. We conclude that combination oral low-dose daily metronomic chemotherapy, using cyclophosphamide and UFT, is superior to monotherapy and seems to be a safe and highly effective experimental antimetastatic therapy, in this case, for advanced metastatic breast cancer.     

Clinical experience of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer

Results from two phase II studies in metastatic breast cancer have shown that the novel, tumour-selective fluoropyrimidine capecitabine provides an effective and well tolerated therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer failing or resistant to anthracycline and taxane therapy. Response rates of between 20 and 25% have been observed, with median survival of 12.2-12.6 months. In addition, there was an acceptable incidence of adverse events including diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome, which can be controlled with a dose reduction. Promising results from two further randomised, phase II studies have indicated that capecitabine may also play a role in first- and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Capecitabine compared favourably with paclitaxel in anthracycline-resistant patients and with intravenous (i.v.) CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)) in post-menopausal women who had received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, with high efficacy and good tolerability. The results of these four phase II studies demonstrate that capecitabine is active and well tolerated in a range of settings for metastatic breast cancer.     

Trastuzumab in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide and methotrexate in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer

Background  

HER2/neu overexpression is linked to promotion of angiogenesis in breast cancer. We therefore tested the activity of the combination of Trastuzumab with metronomic, low dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (CTX) and methotrexate (MTX) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).     

Mitoxantrone, L-leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil: an effective and well tolerated first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The combination of mitoxantrone plus leucovorin/fluorouracil in heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer has shown significant activity and extremely good tolerability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of this combination in patients not previously submitted to chemotherapy. METHODS: From May 1993 to December 1995 we treated 80 patients with advanced breast cancer with a combination of mitoxantrone, l-leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil. All patients had histologically or cytologically proven breast cancer, WHO performance status 0-3, normal hematological parameters and normal serum bilirubin. Prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease was not allowed, whereas adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) or adjuvant anthracycline (doxorubicin or epirubicin) therapy was allowed; a single prior hormone treatment was permitted. Chemotherapy consisted of mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, l-leucovorin 150 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 2 and 3 and 5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 2 and 3. The courses were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Objective response (CR + PR) was observed in 46/80 (57%) patients (95% CI, 46%-68%). Complete response (CR) was observed in 21/80 cases (26%). Response was observed in 14/24 (58%) patients with soft tissues as the dominant site of disease, in 22/34 (65%) patients with visceral involvement and in 10/22 (45%) of those with bone as the dominant site of disease. The median duration of response and survival was 9 months (range, 3-16) and 22 months (range, 2-48+), respectively. Toxicity was very manageable, with grade 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in 6/80 (7.5%) and 1/80 (1.25%) patients, respectively, and negligible non-hematological toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose l-leucovorin is a safe and effective regimen for first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

A phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of tipifarnib, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, and tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitors, which were designed to inhibit oncogenic Ras, act synergistically with tamoxifen in preclinical breast cancer models. We studied the safety and toxicity of tipifarnib in combination with tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tipifarnib were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were enrolled. Two cohorts of patients were treated with tipifarnib at either 200 or 300 mg p.o. twice daily for 21 of 28 days. Tamoxifen (20 mg once daily) was started after 1 week of tipifarnib monotherapy to perform pharmacokinetics and FTase inhibition levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with tipifarnib alone and with tipifarnib and tamoxifen. RESULTS: A total of 12 heavily pretreated patients with prior progression on hormonal therapy were enrolled. Minimal toxicity was observed at the 200-mg dose level of tipifarnib. At the 300-mg dose, all six patients required dose reduction of tipifarnib due to toxicities that included grade 2 nausea, rash, and fatigue and grade 3 diarrhea and neutropenia. Tipifarnib pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables were similar in the presence and absence of tamoxifen. Average FTase inhibition was 42% at 200 mg and 54% at 300 mg in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Of the 12 patients treated, there were two partial responses and one stable disease for >6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Tipifarnib (200 mg twice daily for 21 of 28 days) and tamoxifen (20 mg once daily) can be given safely with minimal toxicity. Tamoxifen does not have a significant effect on tipifarnib pharmacokinetics.     

Paclitaxel and mitoxantrone in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: The combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin is highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, but is associated with substantial toxicity. In this phase II trial, we evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and mitoxantrone in an attempt to maintain efficacy and improve tolerability of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, 1 hr i.v. infusion, and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 i.v., every 21 days. Responding patients received at least six courses of therapy. Ninety-three percent of patients in this trial were receiving first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer; 62% of patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, and 26% had received previous doxorubicin. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in 24 of 61 evaluable patients (39%). Median response duration was 9 months (range 4-37 + months); actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-year survivals were 62, 32, and 25%, respectively. The treatment was generally well tolerated; 78% of patients had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia at sometime during their treatment course, but only 14 hospitalizations for neutropenia and fever were necessary (4% of courses). Grade 3 fatigue was experienced by 30% of patients. Cardiotoxicity was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel and mitoxantrone is active, easily administered, and well tolerated in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Its activity appears similar to several other taxane-based combination regimens recently evaluated for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

Combination chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial comparing the use of adriamycin to that of Vinblastine.

Two regimens of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were compared in a randomized controlled fashion. Regimen 1 consisted of cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CVMF). Regimen 2 consisted of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CAMF). The patient population consisted of both black and white postmenopausal females who had not received any prior chemotherapy. Objective responses were observed in 25/57 patients treated with CVMF and in 28/51 patients treated with CAMF. Neither race nor choice of chemotherapeutic regimen affected prognosis, although there were differences in the pattern of metastatic involvement between the two racial groups. The median duration of survival of patients who responded to therapy has not yet been reached but will be in excess of 12 months.     

A phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: NCCTG study N9932

OBJECTIVE: A phase II multi-institutional clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted, provided that at least 12 months had elapsed between any prior taxane and platinum therapy. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) with carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml.min every 21 days until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. RESULTS: All 53 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was 6. Overall response rate was 60%, with 3 complete responses (6%) and 29 partial responses (54%). Median time to disease progression was 9.6 months. Median survival time was 20.4 months. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 94% of patients and 15% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. The overall incidence (grades 1-3) of neurosensory toxicity was 57% and neuromotor toxicity was 25%, respectively, with grade 3 toxicity occurring in 4% of patients each. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is highly active in metastatic breast cancer. Prophylactic growth factor support is recommended in any further evaluation of this combination in the treatment of patients with breast cancer.     

A study of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, cis-platinum, and methotrexate in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract

Twenty patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract were treated with cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) 40 mg/m2 and cis-platinum (CDDP) 40 mg/m2 given every three weeks for 2 cycles, alternating with methotrexate 40 mg/m2 weekly for six weeks (CAP-M). Five of thirteen (38%) evaluable patients responded, with a significant prolongation of survival. Toxicity in 18 evaluable patients was mild to moderate. Methotrexate can be combined with CAP with significant reduction in dosage of cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and CDDP and reduced toxicity, without major loss of efficacy. The precise role of methotrexate in combination chemotherapy of bladder cancer remains to be defined.