Quantitative real-time PCR with automated sample preparation for diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection in bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND: In bone marrow and stem cell transplant patients, the widespread use of preemptive cytomegalovirus (CMV) antiviral therapy necessitates faster, more precise, and more sensitive quantitative laboratory methods for serial viral load monitoring. METHODS: We developed a novel CMV viral load assay using real-time PCR of plasma DNA prepared by an automated robotic workstation. Fluorescent hybridization probes directed at the glycoprotein B (gB) gene (or EcoRI D region) of CMV were used to detect and quantify PCR products. The beta-globin gene was amplified in parallel to control for the efficiency of the extraction and PCR steps. RESULTS: The assay was linear (R = 0.999) from a lower detection limit of 125 copies/mL to 5 x 10(9) copies/mL with a PCR efficiency of 1.975 (gB) or 2.02 (EcoRI D). The viral loads determined by PCRs directed at these two different viral targets were no different (n = 53; R = 0.928). The interassay CV was 3.5%, and the intraassay CV was 1-4%. Compared with a commercially available quantitative competitive PCR assay (Roche MONITOR; R = 0.59), the mean CMV viral load by real-time PCR was 3.1 times higher (mean ratio; P = 0.002). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the real-time assay were 96% and 100%, respectively (n = 147), compared with 74% and 98% for a qualitative PCR assay (Roche AMPLICOR). On a subset of samples, the diagnostic sensitivity of viral culture was no greater than 50% (n = 44). Of 1115 clinical referral samples from 252 patients, 10% of the samples and 18% of the patients had low-level CMV viremia (median, 500 copies/mL). In this predominantly (85%) bone marrow transplant testing cohort, serial CMV viral load results were the predominant clinical trigger for the initiation, monitoring, and cessation of preemptive antiviral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of automated DNA preparation and semiautomated real-time fluorescent PCR detection allows for a sensitive, precise, and accurate high-throughput assay of CMV viral load that can be used as the laboratory trigger for preemptive antiviral therapy.     

Early detection of plasma cytomegalovirus DNA by real-time PCR after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therefore, preemptive ganciclovir therapy based on early detection of CMV reactivation is widely used to prevent CMV disease. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been widely used for monitoring CMV reactivation as well as the antigenemia assay that detects CMV structural phosphoprotein with a molecular weight of 65,000 (pp65). We developed a real-time PCR assay system for CMV based on a double-stranded DNA-specific dye, SYBR Green I, and quantified DNA, which was extracted automatically from plasma. This real-time PCR assay and the pp65 antigenemia assay were compared in parallel with 357 blood samples obtained from 64 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Real-time PCR assay results correlated with those of the pp65 antigenemia assay (p < 0.0001). It is noteworthy that the detection of CMV DNA by PCR preceded the first positive antigenemia by 14 days. In this study, 10 of 64 patients developed CMV disease. The antigenemia assay detected CMV reactivation earlier than the development of CMV disease only in four of 10 patients. In contrast, our real-time PCR detected CMV-DNA before the development of CMV diseases in eight of 10 patients. The real-time PCR with SYBR Green I as a detection signal is simple and readily performed, and may be a useful system for early detection of CMV reactivation after allo-HSCT.     

Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus infection in transplant patients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a well-known cause of morbidity and mortality in transplantation patients. Monitoring of CMV reactivation from latency is critical for these patients. The key to efficient and effective management of CMV infection is a test capable of rapidly monitoring and quantifying the presence of CMV in the blood. This is essential for the identification of subjects at high risk of developing CMV disease, for example, patients receiving steroid or immunosuppressive compounds for accelerated graft-versus-host disease, transplant rejection and also for the application and monitoring of pre-emptive antiviral therapeutic strategies. The assays presently available and frequently used in this setting include conventional and shell vial culture, the CMV antigenemia assay, PCR for CMV DNA, hybrid capture assay for CMV DNA and detection of CMV RNA by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. The low sensitivity and low reproducibility of conventional cell culture and shell vial assays limit their role in the management of CMV infection to one of disease diagnosis. Diagnostic assays, such as the pp65 antigenemia and other molecular assays, have improved the ability to diagnose CMV disease quickly and accurately. These methods fulfill the requirements for a good diagnostic assay: they have high sensitivity, most can quantify viral load and they are rapid and reproducible. Their characteristics allow these assays to be used to predict the development of CMV disease and monitor response to therapy.     

Adoptive transfer of cytomegalovirus-specific CTL to stem cell transplant patients after selection by HLA-peptide tetramers

Stem cell transplantation is used widely in the management of a range of diseases of the hemopoietic system. Patients are immunosuppressed profoundly in the early posttransplant period, and reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Adoptive transfer of donor-derived CMV-specific CD8+ T cell clones has been shown to reduce the rate of viral reactivation; however, the complexity of this approach severely limits its clinical application. We have purified CMV-specific CD8+ T cells from the blood of stem cell transplant donors using staining with HLA-peptide tetramers followed by selection with magnetic beads. CMV-specific CD8+ cells were infused directly into nine patients within 4 h of selection. Median cell dosage was 8.6 x 10(3)/kg with a purity of 98% of all T cells. CMV-specific CD8+ T cells became detectable in all patients within 10 d of infusion, and TCR clonotype analysis showed persistence of infused cells in two patients studied. CMV viremia was reduced in every case and eight patients cleared the infection, including one patient who had a prolonged history of CMV infection that was refractory to antiviral therapy. This novel approach to adoptive transfer has considerable potential for antigen-specific T cell therapy.     

Quantification of cytomegalovirus viral load

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a member of the Herpesviridae family, is worldwide distributed. After the primary infection, CMV induces a latent infection with possible reactivation(s). It is responsible for severe to life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised patients and in foetuses and newborns of infected mothers. For monitoring CMV load, classical techniques based on rapid culture or pp65 antigenemia are progressively replaced by quantitative nuclear acid tests (QNAT), easier to implement and standardize. A large variety of QNAT are available from laboratory-developed assays to fully-automated commercial tests. The indications of CMV quantification include CMV infection during pregnancy and in newborns, and viral surveillance of grafted and non-grafted immunocompromised patients, patients with bowel inflammatory diseases and those hospitalised in intensive care unit. A close cooperation between virologists and clinicians is essential for optimizing the benefit of CMV DNA monitoring.     

Development of real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus,comparison of TaqMan probes,and molecular beacons

Human Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause serious complications in immunocompromised patients. Rapid diagnosis of EBV and CMV infection is critical in the management of the disease so that anti-viral therapy can be started early. Here we describe the development of real-time PCR assays using TaqMan probes and molecular beacons and compare the performance of both assays with a well-established, validated, gel-based PCR method for the quantification of EBV and CMV in patients’ samples. The TaqMan and molecular beacon assays were linear between 10 to 10⁷ viral genomes/reaction. Both assays generated calibration curves with strong correlation and low intra-assay and interassay variation. Results of EBV and CMV viral load determination inpatient samples obtained by the gel-based and real-time PCR were very similar. The real-time PCR assays showed increases in viral load before clinical measures of viral disease and decreases in viral load during anti-viral therapy in two of six pediatric patients. The data indicate that these TaqMan and molecular beacon approaches are accurate, rapid, and reliable assays for the diagnosis and monitoring of EBV and CMV infections in patients.     

A case of refractory cytomegalovirus-related thrombocytopenia that achieved complete remission without antiviral therapy

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the major infectious etiologies that induce thrombocytopenia. Although immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in children is often preceded by viral infections, thrombocytopenia associated with active CMV infection is considered CMV-related thrombocytopenia (CMV-thrombocytopenia), which can be distinguished from ITP. CMV-thrombocytopenia is reported to be less responsive to standard therapies for ITP and may require antiviral therapies. We herein report a case of refractory CMV-thrombocytopenia that achieved complete remission without antiviral therapy.A 20-month-old boy presented with a 2-day history of fever and systemic petechiae. There were no abnormal findings except for an extremely low platelet count (8000/μl) on blood examinations. He was clinically diagnosed with ITP, and intravenous immunoglobulin was administered twice, but his platelet count did not increase. CMV infection was suspected serologically, and a high CMV DNA load was detected in serum by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Without antiviral treatment, the CMV DNA load decreased below the detection limit on the 11th day of admission, followed by complete remission of the thrombocytopenia. The present case suggests that spontaneous recovery of thrombocytopenia can be expected in immunocompetent patients with CMV-thrombocytopenia in whom decreased CMV DNA load is observed.     

Cytomegaloviral infection in patients with hemoblastoses

AIM: To estimate the incidence of cytomegaloviral (CMV) infection and CMV disease in patients with acute leukemia at different stages of chemotherapy and in patients after transplantation of hemopoietic cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial was carried out in 33 patients with acute leukemia at different stages of chemotherapy, 20 patients subjected to transplantation of autologic hemopoietic cells and 21 patients who had received transplantation of allogenic hemopoietic cells. To study the dynamics of the CMV infection markers, enzyme immunoassay of the titer of the specific immunoglobulins M and G was made, detection of the viral antigen in immunofluorescence reaction and cultivation with fibroblast cell culture and determination of the cytomegalovirus DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Before chemotherapy, up to 90% patients with acute leukemia were infected with cytomegalovirus (similar rate of infection was observed in healthy donors of hemopoietic cells). By the time of transplantation all the patients were infected with cytomegalovirus. During chemotherapy of acute leukemia, the primary infection and reactivation of latent infection occurred in 30% patients, whereas CMV disease developed in 18% patients. In case of transplantation of autologic hemopoietic cells the rate of reactivation of CMV infection (15%) was one-half of that value in patients with acute leukemia (30%). Similar trend was observed in case of development of CMV disease (5% and 18%, respectively). In case of transplantation of allogenic hemopoietic cells the incidence of reactivation of CMV infection was three times higher than in case of transplantation of autologic hemopoietic cells (47.6% and 15%, respectively, p = 0.02). The incidence of development of CMV disease in case of transplantation of allogenic hemopoietic cells was also significantly higher than in case of transplantation of autologic hemopoietic cells (28.6% and 5%, respectively, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cytomegalovirus is an infection agent responsible for severe complications of chemotherapy of acute leukemia and transplantation of hemopoietic cells in patients with hemoblastoses. Among hematological patients, the group of the highest risk of development of this complication includes recipients of transplantation of allogenic hemopoietic cells, particularly from seronegative donors.     

Foscarnet in the management of cytomegalovirus infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

Despite significant advances in the day-to-day management of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantations, including the introduction of new antiviral drugs, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to undertake a literature-based review of foscarnet in this therapeutic setting and to align current best-published evidence with recent recommendations presented at the European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia. Ganciclovir remains the mainstay of CMV infection/disease antiviral management protocols. However, approximately a third of patients develop severe neutropenia and others become resistant to ganciclovir, and thus, a reasonably large proportion of patients are not able to receive and/or continue with this medication. Foscarnet is a suitable option as both pre-emptive therapy or for the treatment of active disease in these patients. Randomized trials have demonstrated that foscarnet is equally effective when compared with ganciclovir for pre-emptive treatment of CMV infections: the outcome was comparable with ganciclovir in terms of control of antigenemia and survival rates. There is a paucity of information for its use in the prophylaxis of CMV, although preliminary data show that it was effective in some patients at high risk of CMV reactivation. The main adverse events associated with foscarnet are renal impairment, serum electrolyte and hemoglobin disturbances, seizures and local genital irritation/ulceration. Foscarnet is a well-established antiviral option in immunocompromised patients, and it is usually administered as a second-line option to ganciclovir. In patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it has proven efficacy when used pre-emptively to treat CMV reactivation, as an alternative to and also in combination with ganciclovir.     

Laboratory diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in immunodepressed patients, mainly in patients with AIDS

There is a high prevalence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the general population. An important proportion of immunodepressed patients are latent carriers of the virus, and under these conditions, the lack of cellular immunity predisposes the patient to an active infection in which the virus is replicating. Consequences for the immunodepressed patients are widely variable, ranging from completely asymptomatic infections to life-threatening situations. An important characteristic of these infections is that they have no specific clinical symptoms and are often indistinguishable from other types of infection. As such, clinical diagnosis should be supported by laboratory tests. There are many diagnostic tests available, the choice of which one to use being made on the basis of clinician-defined objectives. The CMV immunological state of the patient should be ascertained in order to indicate the possibility of reactivation or the risk of primary infection. To this end, serological tests have proven to be the most useful. Laboratory tests also allow the rapid diagnosis of active CMV infections, for which rapid culture techniques (shell-vial) or viral antigen tests (antigenemia pp65) are more appropriate. Given that not all active infections present with symptoms, the most typical problem in clinical practice is to distinguish between symptoms and illnesses caused by CMV (CMV disease: CMVD), and other infectious or non-infectious entities. To clarify this situation, diagnostic histopathology and methods able to quantify the viral load (pp65 antigenemia and quantitative PCR) are of great use. The identification of patients who, during active infection, are at high risk of contracting CMVD in the near future, is a more complex challenge for the laboratory. Once again, tests that are able to quantify the viral load are the most appropriate for identifying those patients who should receive preventive antiviral treatment. In HIV-positive patients, CMVD tends to manifest itself as retinitis and involvement of the gastrointestinal tract. The principal risk factor in the development of CMVD in these patients is the degree of immunodepression, which appears almost exclusively in patients with a CD4+ lymphocyte count lower than 50/mm3 and when other opportunistic infections have occurred. The advent of oral ganciclovir has raised the possibility of long-term prophylactic treatment of CMVD, making the search for virological and immunological markers that identify these high-risk patients a priority. Techniques allowing the quantification of CMV viremia, namely pp65 antigenemia and quantitative PCR, have been most useful to this end.     

Real-time Epstein-Barr virus PCR for the diagnosis of primary EBV infections and EBV reactivation.

BACKGROUND: The serological diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections is often difficult, whereas the relevance of elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against early antigen (EA) for the diagnosis of EBV reactivation has increasingly become a matter of dispute. Recently, EBV PCR has been added as a diagnostic tool. Positive EBV PCR has been demonstrated in the serum of patients with primary EBV infections and EBV reactivation. OBJECTIVES: To compare classical serological diagnosis of primary EBV infection and EBV reactivation with real-time EBV PCR. STUDY DESIGN: Sera from 45 patients were selected with detectable immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies against EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA), and 62 sera were selected with a reactivation profile. A real-time EBV PCR was performed with DNA extracted from these sera. RESULTS: Based on serological data, the diagnosis of primary EBV infection was established for 24 of the 45 IgM VCA-positive patients. By performing PCR, seven extra cases of primary infection were diagnosed for which no heterophilic antibodies could be detected. In five cases of primary infection, no EBV DNA could be detected by PCR. Only in two of the 62 sera with a reactivation seroprofile could EBV DNA be detected. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, we suggest that for the diagnosis of primary infections, EBV PCR could lead to an increase of >16% in the number of positive diagnoses by confirming a positive IgM VCA in the absence of heterophilic antibodies. Furthermore, EBV PCR is positive in only 3% of sera with elevated antibodies against EA, raising doubt as to the utility of EA titers for diagnosing EBV reactivation.     

Detection of cytomegalovirus-specific IGM in renal transplant recipients

We have compared two IgM-specific cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody assays, an immunofluorescence assay (IFA-M) and an enzyme-linked antigen immunoassay (ELA-M), with an assay for CMV total antibody (ELISA) and viral culture for the detection of active CMV infection in renal transplant recipients. Of 75 patients (49 ELISA negative pretransplant, 26 ELISA positive), CMV-specific IgM was detected in 35 (27 ELISA negative pretransplant, 8 ELISA positive) using the IFA-M assay and in 25 (16 ELISA negative pretransplant, 9 ELISA positive) using the ELA-M test. Of the 25 patients identified as positive by ELA-M, 21 had positive viral cultures post-transplant, two seronegative patients had evidence of infection indicated by post-transplant seroconversion, and two patients were seropositive pretransplant but remained viral culture negative throughout the follow-up period. ELA-M and CMV total antibody ELISA detected primary infection in renal transplant recipients equally well, but ELA-M was found to be superior to ELISA and IFA-M for detecting reinfection and reactivation infections.     

Cellular immunotherapy for cytomegalovirus and HIV-1 infection

Current antiviral drugs do not fully reconstitute the specific antiviral immune control in chronically human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients or in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-infected patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therefore, immunotherapy in which the patient's immune system is manipulated to enhance antiviral immune responses has become a promising area of viral immunology research. In this review, an overview is provided on the cellular immunotherapy strategies that have been developed for HIV infection and CMV reactivation in immunocompromised patients. As an introduction, the mechanisms behind the cellular immune system and their importance for the development of a workable immunotherapy approach are discussed. Next, the focus is shifted to the immunopathogenesis of CMV and HIV-1 infections to correlate these findings with the concepts and ideas behind the viral-specific immunotherapies discussed. Current and future perspectives of active and passive cellular immunotherapy for the treatment of CMV and HIV-1 infections are reviewed. Finally, pitfalls and key issues with regard to the development of immunotherapy protocols that can be applied in a clinical setting are addressed.     

Management and prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation.

We reviewed the epidemiologic characteristics, diagnosis, clinical features, and management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after renal transplantation. CMV, the major viral pathogen after renal transplantation, increases patient morbidity and mortality. The spectrum of CMV infection ranges from latent infection to asymptomatic viral shedding to life-threatening multisystem disease. The two major risk factors for the development of CMV infection in renal transplant recipients are (1) preexisting CMV antibody seropositivity of either the organ donor or the recipient and (2) host immunosuppression. Blood cultures (but not urine cultures) positive for CMV predict the progression of asymptomatic infection to CMV disease, characterized by fever, malaise, myalgia, leukopenia, abnormal transaminase levels, and often involvement of the lung and gut. New genomic methods of viral detection now offer diagnostic advantages, including methods of detecting only actively replicating CMV. No evidence shows that CMV directly causes allograft rejection or glomerulonephritis, but patients with tissue-invasive CMV disease have higher rates of allograft loss and mortality than do those without the disease. Therapy for established CMV disease includes decreasing the immunosuppressive therapy and administering the antiviral agent ganciclovir sodium. Proven prophylactic strategies include limitation of exposure to the virus from CMV seropositive blood or organ donors, administration of CMV-specific immune globulin, and use of high-dose acyclovir therapy. Preemptive therapy with ganciclovir is a promising alternative to prophylaxis for patients at highest risk for progression to symptomatic CMV disease, such as those with CMV viremia and seropositive recipients receiving antilymphocyte therapy.     

Predictive value of quantitative PCR-based viral burden analysis for eight human herpesviruses in pediatric solid organ transplant patients

Human herpesviruses can cause significant morbidity and mortality in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. It was hypothesized that viral burden quantification by polymerase chain reaction using an internal calibration standard could aid in distinguishing between viral disease and latency. Here we report the results of a 2-year prospective study of 27 pediatric solid organ (liver, kidney, or heart) transplant recipients in which multiple samples were analyzed for levels of all eight human herpesviruses by internal calibration standard-polymerase chain reaction. Herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus, and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus were not detected in any of these samples. Human herpesvirus types 6 and 7 were detected in half of the patients, but were present at low levels, similar to those found in reference populations. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) were detected in 89% and 56% of the patients, respectively. Viral burden analysis suggested distinct patient populations for CMV, with a natural cutoff of 10,000 viral targets/ml blood strongly associated with disease. In some cases, a dramatic increase in CMV levels preceded clinical evidence of disease by several weeks. EBV viral burden was relatively high in the only patient presenting with an EBV syndrome. However, two other patients without evidence of EBV disease had single samples with high EBV burden. Rapid reduction in both EBV and CMV burden occurred with antiviral treatment. These data suggest that viral burden analysis using internal calibration standard-polymerase chain reaction for CMV, and possibly other herpesviruses, is an effective method for monitoring pediatric transplant patients for significant herpesvirus infection and response to therapy.     

巨细胞病毒定量PCR与pp65抗原测定监测异基因造血干细胞移植巨细胞病毒感染的比较

本研究比较巨细胞病毒（CMV）定量PCR检测和CMV—pp65抗原检测在异基因造血干细胞移植CMV感染中的诊断价值。以84例异基因造血干细胞移植患者为研究对象,自预处理开始每周对患者EDTA抗凝外周血血标本进行CMV—pp65抗原及cMV定量PCR动态检测,直至出院,比较观察两者在诊断CMV感染中的作用。结果表明：84例移植患者的732份系列血标本中,26例移植后检出CMV定量PCR阳性,检出率30．95％,其中9例为cMV血症,13例为cMV病,检出中位时间为37．1（7—105）天;22例CMVpp65抗原检测阳性,检出率26．19％,检出中位时间为46．6（10—128）天;所有CMV—pp65抗原检测阳性患者CMV定量PCR均为阳性,4例CMV定量PCR阳性但CMV—pp65抗原检测阴性患者均未发展为CMV病。CMV病多出现于CMV定量PCR中等至高拷贝数或中等至高水平病毒血症（CMV—pp65抗原）病例中。治疗后CMV定量PCR转阴中位时间为17．5（11—28）天。CMV—pp65抗原转阴中位时间为10．0（7—21）天。结论：CMV定量PCR和CMV—pv65抗原检测均能作为异基因造血干细胞移植CMV感染早期诊断的有效手段,CMV定量PCR更敏感,CMV—pp65抗原检测更特异,两者同时使用能更有效地提高CMV感染诊断水平,监控其发生发展。     

Choice of antibody immunotherapy influences cytomegalovirus viremia in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients requires immunotherapy against allo- and autoreactive T-cells. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause for morbidity after transplantation and is possibly related to recurrent autoimmunity. In this study, we assessed the pattern of CMV viremia in SPK transplant recipients receiving either antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or anti-CD25 (daclizumab) immunosuppressive induction therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated 36 SPK transplant recipients from a randomized cohort that received either ATG or daclizumab as induction therapy. Patients at risk for CMV infection received oral prophylactic ganciclovir therapy. The CMV DNA level in plasma was measured for at least 180 days using a quantitative real-time PCR. Recipient peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cross-sectionally HLA tetramer-stained for CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cells. RESULTS: Positive CMV serostatus in donors was correlated with a higher incidence of CMV viremia than negative serostatus. In patients at risk, daclizumab induction therapy significantly prolonged CMV-free survival. CMV viremia occurred earlier and was more severe in patients with rejection episodes than in patients without rejection episodes. CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell counts were significantly lower in patients developing CMV viremia than in those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their comparable immunosuppressive potential, daclizumab is safer than ATG regarding CMV infection risk in SPK transplantation. ATG-treated rejection episodes are associated with earlier and more severe infection. Furthermore, high CMV-specific tetramer counts reflect antiviral immunity rather than concurrent viremia because they imply low viremic activity. These findings may prove valuable in the discussion on both safety of induction therapy and recurrent autoimmunity in SPK and islet transplantation.     

Anti-TNF drugs in patients with hepatitis B or C virus infection: safety and clinical management

INTRODUCTION: Drugs targeting TNF-α biological activity are increasingly used for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, like rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases and psoriasis. Since TNF-α is a mediator of the immune response against viral infections, use of TNF-α inhibitors in patients with concurrent HBV or HCV infection can promote viral reactivation and potentially fatal liver failure. AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews TNF mechanisms of action in viral hepatitis B and C, recommendations for managing HBV and HCV-infected patients receiving treatment with anti-TNF drugs, safety and anti-TNF hepatotoxicity. EXPERT OPINION: In hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers undergoing anti-TNF therapy, either anti-HBV treatment or prophylaxis is mandatory to prevent hepatitis reactivation, whereas HBsAg-negative antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) seropositive patients require watchful monitoring, only. Conversely, in HCV-infected patients, TNF-α inhibition by specific drugs is safe and could be even beneficial, as TNF-α pathways are involved in perpetuating liver inflammation and fibrosis progression in HCV. HBV- or HCV-infected patients should be referred to a hepatologist for expert clinical management whenever antiviral therapy is deemed necessary or hepatitis reactivation occurs.     

Absence of activation of CMV by blood transfusion to HIV-infected, CMV-seropositive patients

BACKGROUND: The Viral Activation Transfusion Study (VATS) afforded an opportunity to determine whether blood transfusions, and in particular exogenous WBCs, "activate" CMV replication in HIV-infected, CMV-seropositive patients, and whether such patients can be superinfected by additional strains of CMV transmitted via blood transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 531 patients were randomized to receive either WBC-reduced (WBCR) or non-WBC-reduced (NWBCR) RBC units. Plasma CMV PCR assays were performed before transfusion and weekly after transfusion for 4 weeks. NWBCR cases with evidence of possible reactivation and/or superinfection were further studied for donor viremia by DNA PCR of frozen retention segments and new genotype acquisition using gB envelope sequence analysis of pre- and posttransfusion recipient specimens. RESULTS: VATS patients received a median of two RBC units during their initial transfusion. Whether positive or negative for CMV DNA at baseline, there were no significant treatment-arm differences in the percentage of patients who had positive qualitative CMV PCR or increases in CMV viral load at follow-up. Of 50 recipients randomized to NWBCR RBC and meeting criteria for possible CMV superinfection, 25 had sufficient CMV DNA load in a baseline and one or more viremic follow-up sample to permit comparison of gB genotypes. Only two recipients showed genotype shifts. Of 125 WBC pellets prepared from the seropositive units transfused into these 50 cases, only 1 tested weakly PCR positive for CMV DNA (insufficient copy number for genotyping). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of "activation" of CMV by blood transfusion. Among the NWBCR RBC recipients, there was little evidence of possible transmission of new CMV strains. Hence, the current policy for transfusion support of HIV-infected patients, which allows transfusion of CMV-antibody-positive blood to CMV-seropositive patients, is appropriate.     

Cytomegalovirus reactivation and associated outcome of critically ill patients with severe sepsis

Introduction

Sepsis has been identified as a risk factor for human cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill patients. However, the contribution of CMV reactivation on morbidity and mortality is still controversial. Therefore, we analyzed the incidence and impact of CMV reactivation on outcome in patients with severe sepsis.

Methods

In a prospective longitudinal double-blinded observational study, 97 adult nonimmunosuppressed CMV-seropositive patients with new onset of severe sepsis were included. Leukocytes, plasma and tracheal secretions were examined weekly for CMV-DNA by PCR. Tracheal secretions were additionally tested for HSV (Herpes Simplex Virus)-DNA. The influence of CMV-reactivation on the endpoints was analysed by Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis. Time-dependency was evaluated by landmark analysis.

Results

Six out 97 died and five were discharged from the hospital within 72 hours and were excluded of the analysis. CMV reactivation occurred in 35 of the 86 (40.69%) analysed patients. HSV infection occurred in 23 of the 35 (65.7%) CMV reactivators. In 10 patients CMV-plasma-DNAemia appeared with a DNA-content below 600 copies/ml in four cases and a peak amount of 2,830 copies/ml on average. In patients with and without CMV reactivation mortality rates were similar (37.1% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.861), respectively. However, in the multivariate COX regression analyses CMV reactivation was independently associated with increased length of stay in the ICU (30.0, interquartile range 14 to 48 vs. 12.0, interquartile range 7 to 19 days; HR (hazard ratio) 3.365; 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.233 to 9.183, P = 0.018) and in the hospital (33.0, interquartile range 24 to 62 vs. 16.0, interquartile range 10 to 24 days, HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.25, P < 0.001) as well as prolonged mechanical ventilation (22.0, interquartile range 6 to 36 vs. 7.5, interquartile range 5 to 15.5 days; HR 2.6,CI 95% 1.39 to 4.94; P < 0.001) and impaired pulmonary gas exchange (six days, interquartile range 1 to 17, vs. three, interquartile range 1 to 7, days in reactivators vs. non-reactivators, P = 0.038). HSV reactivation proved not to be a risk factor for these adverse effects.

Conclusions

These data indicate an independent correlation between CMV reactivation and increased morbidity in the well-defined group of nonimmunosuppressed patients with severe sepsis, but CMV reactivation had no impact on mortality in this group with low CMV-DNA plasma levels. Thus, the potential harms and benefits of antiviral treatment have to be weighed cautiously in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.