Differential expression of EGR-1 mRNA in the amygdala following diazepam in contextual fear conditioning

The amygdaloid complex is thought to be a major site of action of anxiolytic benzodiazepine agonists. To investigate whether activity in the amygdaloid complex is altered with anxiolytic effects of diazepam, mRNA expression of the immediate-early gene EGR-1 was examined in the amygdala following blockade of fear conditioning by diazepam. It was previously shown that mRNA expression of EGR-1 (also called, NGFI-A, Zif 268, Krox 24) increases in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) shortly following contextual fear conditioning. It was therefore hypothesized that diazepam would block both contextual fear and the concomitant increase in EGR-1 mRNA expression in the LA induced by fear conditioning. Rats administered systemic diazepam before fear conditioning displayed both anxiolytic effects during the post-shock period and amnesic effects during a retention test 24 h later. Diazepam blocked the fear-conditioning-induced increase in EGR-1 expression in the LA. In addition, diazepam significantly increased EGR-1 mRNA expression in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) in a dose-dependent manner. The results reveal differential regulation of EGR-1 by diazepam in the central and lateral nuclei of the amygdala suggesting that these two amygdala nuclei act in a reciprocal manner during the anxiolytic and amnesic action of the benzodiazepine agonist.     

Fear conditioning is impaired in systemic kainic acid and amygdala-stimulation models of epilepsy

PURPOSE: The lateral nucleus of the amygdala is critical for fear conditioning, a paradigm of emotional learning, which requires recognition of an unconditioned stimulus as aversive and association of conditioned stimuli with an unconditioned stimulus. Some patients with temporal lobe epilepsy have amygdaloid damage associated with impaired emotional learning. Fear conditioning also is impaired at least in some animal models of epilepsy. We studied whether contextual or tone-cued fear conditioning is impaired in two status epilepticus models of epilepsy and whether impairment correlates with the extent of damage in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala. METHODS: We induced epilepsy in rats by either systemic kainic acid administration or electrical amygdala stimulation. Behavioral reactions in all phases of fear conditioning were analyzed from videotapes. Damage to the lateral nucleus of the amygdala was analyzed from thionin-stained sections both histologically and by volumetry. RESULTS: Immediate reflexive responses to unconditioned and conditioned stimuli were preserved, whereas the freezing response to an unconditioned stimulus was reduced. Contextual conditioning was severely impaired, whereas tone-cued conditioning was better preserved. The lateral nucleus pathology did not correlate with impaired fear conditioning. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that processing of complex contextual stimuli is severely affected in experimental epilepsy, whereas conditioning to simple cues is better preserved.     

Metabotropic glutamate receptors are involved in amygdaloid plasticity

The amygdala plays an important role in emotional learning. Synaptic plasticity underlying the acquisition of conditioned fear occurs in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala: long-term potentiation (LTP) of synapses in the pathway of the conditioned stimulus (CS) has shown to be a neural correlate of this kind of emotional learning. The present study is based on previous results of our laboratory showing an important role of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) in fear conditioning. Here, we explored whether mGlu5 receptors within the lateral nucleus of the amygdala are involved in the plasticity underlying fear conditioning. We used an in vivo approach investigating the acquisition, consolidation and expression of conditioned fear by the fear-potentiated startle paradigm and by the inhibition of motor activity during CS presentation. Additionally, we used an in vitro approach inducing LTP in the lateral amygdala by patch-clamp recordings in rat brain slices. Acquisition of conditioned fear, but not consolidation and expression, was blocked by intra-amygdaloid injections of the specific mGluR5 antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl) pyridine hydrochloride (MPEP) in vivo. Furthermore, induction of amygdaloid LTP but not synaptic transmission was disrupted by MPEP application in vitro. These experiments show for the first time in vivo and in vitro that mGluR5 receptors are necessary for plasticity in the amygdala.     

Hitting Ras where it counts: Ras antagonism in the basolateral amygdala inhibits long-term fear memory

Several studies have implicated the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in Pavlovian fear conditioning. RasGRF1 knockout mice show significant deficits in acquisition of long-term fear memories and long-term potentaition (LTP) in the basolateral amygdala (BLA). MAPK kinase inhibition also impairs fear conditioning and amygdaloid LTP. However, there is no direct evidence to date for the involvement of Ras itself in fear conditioning. To address this issue, we examined the effects of intra-amygdala infusions of the selective Ras antagonist farnesylthiosalicylic acid (FTS) on the acquisition and expression of conditional freezing in rats. Micro-infusions of FTS into the BLA prior to contextual fear conditioning significantly impaired acquisition of long-term contextual fear memory in a dose-dependent manner. Post-training FTS infusions had no effect on acquisition of long-term fear memory. The effects of FTS on fear conditioning were specific for the BLA. Finally, intra-amygdala infusions of FTS inhibited MAPK activation in BLA. Collectively, these results provide further evidence for the involvement of amygdaloid Ras in the acquisition of long-term conditional fear memory.     

Memory consolidation of Pavlovian fear conditioning requires nitric oxide signaling in the lateral amygdala

Nitric oxide (NO) has been widely implicated in synaptic plasticity and memory formation. In studies of long-term potentiation (LTP), NO is thought to serve as a 'retrograde messenger' that contributes to presynaptic aspects of LTP expression. In this study, we examined the role of NO signaling in Pavlovian fear conditioning. We first show that neuronal nitric oxide synthase is localized in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA), a critical site of plasticity in fear conditioning. We next show that NO signaling is required for LTP at thalamic inputs to the LA and for the long-term consolidation of auditory fear conditioning. Collectively, the findings suggest that NO signaling is an important component of memory formation of auditory fear conditioning, possibly as a retrograde signal that participates in presynaptic aspects of plasticity in the LA.     

Production of the Fos protein after contextual fear conditioning of C57BL/6N mice

Male C57BL/6N mice were chosen to determine Fos production during acquisition of context-dependent fear and after re-exposure to the conditioning context. Fear-conditioning was induced by a single exposure of mice to a context followed by an electric shock. Control groups consisted of mice exposed to context only (Context group) or to an immediate electric shock. When contextual retention was measured 24 h after conditioning (retention test 1), significant contextual generalization was observed. However, when animals were exposed to a different context from days 2–5 after conditioning and then tested for retention on day 6 (retention test 2), generalization was markedly reduced. After the training, the fear-conditioned mice produced higher Fos levels than mice exposed to an immediate shock in the hippocampus, medial amygdaloid nucleus and parietal somatosensory cortex. Both shock groups produced significantly more Fos than the Context group in the central nucleus of the amygdala. After retention test 1, fear-conditioned mice generated more Fos in the hippocampus and central amygdaloid nucleus than the two control groups. However, all groups exhibited similarly low Fos production after retention test 2. The results demonstrated that simultaneous Fos production in the hippocampus, central and medial nuclei of amygdala and somatosensory parietal cortex closely paralleled the ability of mice to acquire conditioned fear. In contrast, Fos production after the retention tests did not correlate with the expression of conditioned fear.     

Hippocampal NMDA receptor blockade impairs CREB phosphorylation in amygdala after contextual fear conditioning

In contextual fear conditioning (CFC), hippocampus is thought to process environmental stimuli into a configural representation of the context and send it to amygdala nuclei, which current evidences point to be the site of CS‐US association and fear memory storage. If it is true, hippocampus should influence learning‐induced plasticity in the amygdala nuclei after CFC acquisition. To test this, we infused wistar rats with saline or AP5, a NMDA receptor antagonist, in the dorsal hippocampus just before a CFC session, in which they were conditioned to a single shock, exposed to the context with no shocks or received an immediate shock. The rats were perfused, their brains harvested and immunohistochemically stained for cAMP element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation ratio (pCREB/CREB) in lateral (LA), basal (B) and central (CeA) amygdala nuclei. CFC showed a learning‐specific increase in pCREB ratio in B and CeA, in conditioned‐saline rats compared to context and immediate shocked ones. Further, conditioned rats that received AP5 showed a decrease in pCREB ratio in LA, B and CeA. Our results support the current ideas that the role of hippocampus in contextual fear conditioning occurs by sending contextual information to amygdala to serve as conditioned stimulus. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Internuclear synapse in the amygdala is not facilitated in fear conditioning

The amygdala is essential for fear learning and memory. Synaptic transmission is enhanced in two pathways in the amygdala in fear conditioning. In this study we examined whether lateral (LA) to basolateral (BLA) amygdala synapses are potentiated and participate in intra-amygdala plasticity during the maintenance of fear memory. Our data showed that synaptic strength from the LA (ventrolateral) to the BLA (parvicellular) pathway was not increased after fear conditioning and suggests that this pathway does not integrate information relevant to the coding of memories in auditory fear learning.     

Fear conditioning in C57/BL/6 and DBA/2 mice: variability in nucleus accumbens function according to the strain predisposition to show contextual- or cue-based responding

The contribution of the nucleus accumbens shell, the dorsal hippocampus, and the basolateral amygdala to contextual and explicit cue fear conditioning was assessed in C57BL/6 (C57) and DBA/2 (DBA) mice showing differences in processing contextual information associated with consistent but non-pathological variations in hippocampal functionality. Mice from both strains with bilateral ibotenic acid or sham lesions located in each area were introduced in a conditioning chamber and exposed twice to the pairing of a tone (2 x 8 s, 2000 Hz, 80 dB) with a shock (2 s, 0.7 mA). On the following day, mice were first exposed to the training context then to the tone in a different context. Freezing behaviour was scored in all situations. C57 showed more freezing to the context than to the tone whereas DBA showed more freezing to the tone than to the context. In C57, both nucleus accumbens and hippocampal lesions impaired acquisition of contextual fear conditioning but paradoxically improved acquisition of cue fear conditioning, whereas amygdala lesions disrupted performance in every task. In DBA, nucleus accumbens lesions, like amygdala lesions, impaired acquisition of both contextual and cue fear conditioning, whereas hippocampal lesions did not produce any effect. The parallelism between the effect of nucleus accumbens and hippocampus lesions in C57, and between the effect of nucleus accumbens and amygdala lesions in DBA points to a variability in nucleus accumbens function according to the strain specialization to develop context- or cue-based responding.     

NMDA receptors are essential for the acquisition, but not expression, of conditional fear and associative spike firing in the lateral amygdala

We examined the contribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDARs) to the acquisition and expression of amygdaloid plasticity and Pavlovian fear conditioning using single-unit recording techniques in behaving rats. We demonstrate that NMDARs are essential for the acquisition of both behavioral and neuronal correlates of conditional fear, but play a comparatively limited role in their expression. Administration of the competitive NMDAR antagonist +/--3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl) propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) prior to auditory fear conditioning completely abolished the acquisition of conditional freezing and conditional single-unit activity in the lateral amygdala (LA). In contrast, CPP given prior to extinction testing did not affect the expression of conditional single-unit activity in LA, despite producing deficits in conditional freezing. Administration of CPP also blocked the induction of long-term potentiation in the amygdala. Together, these data suggest that NMDARs are essential for the acquisition of conditioning-related plasticity in the amygdala, and that NMDARs are more critical for regulating synaptic plasticity and learning than routine synaptic transmission in the circuitry supporting fear conditioning.     

Selective activation of mesoamygdaloid dopamine neurons by conditioned stress: attenuation by diazepam

Populations of dopamine (DA) neurons in the rat brain are selectively activated by stress, and the response is attenuated by the administration of anxiolytics. Given the role of the component nuclei of the amygdaloid complex in conditioned associations, stress responses and the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines, we hypothesized that particular mesoamygdaloid DA projections might be especially sensitive to the effects of conditioned stress and to diazepam (DZ). We mapped the effect of a conditioned stressor on the concentration of the DA metabolite homovanillic acid (HVA) in distinct amygdaloid nuclei and other brain nuclei and areas and the effect of DZ (1 or 3 mg/kg) on the conditioned response in drug-experienced subjects. The conditioned stress paradigm resulted in significant elevations in classical indices of stress, including serum corticosterone and plasma epinephrine. Conditioned stress-induced increases in the estimated activity of DA neurons were specific for DA neurons projecting to the central, basolateral and lateral amygdaloid nuclei, and for DA projections to the dorsal septal nucleus. Conditioned stress-induced increases in the HVA concentration of responsive amygdaloid nuclei were antagonized by low, anxiolytic doses of DZ. These results indicate a role for a subset of mesoamygdaloid DA projections in transducing the impact of perceived stressors on the output of the amygdaloid complex. A role for particular amygdaloid DA projections in the formation of conditioned fear or anticipatory anxiety and its modulation by anxiolytics is also suggested.     

Implication of the serotoninergic system in the decreased ACTH response to stress after lesion of the amygdaloid central nucleus

1. The present study was designed to ascertain the possible implication of the serotoninergic system and the central amygdaloid nucleus in the control of ACTH secretion in response to immobilization stress.

2. The response to immobilization stress of intact and lesioned animals was studied by monitoring the plasma and pituitary ACTH concentration and the activity of the serotoninergic system within specific hypothalamic and amygdaloid nuclei.

3. Bilateral lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala significantly decreased the secretion of ACTH in response to immobilization. Moreover, the serotoninergic activity in most of the hypothalamic and in all the amygdaloid nuclei studied was greatly increased. A 60-min immobilization stress prevented this increase in the hypothalamic nuclei but not in the amygdala.

4. These results indicate that the central nucleus of the amygdala participates in the regulation of ACTH secretion in response to immobilization stress. Furthermore, they substantiate the hypothesis of a participation of the serotoninergic system in limbic areas, particularly in nuclei which contain neurons possessing glucocorticoid receptors such as the medial, basomedial and cortical amygdaloid nuclei.     

Tonic inhibition in principal cells of the amygdala: a central role for α3 subunit-containing GABAA receptors

GABAergic inhibition in the amygdala is essential in regulating fear and anxiety. Although fast "phasic" inhibition arising through the activation of postsynaptic GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) has been well described in the amygdala, much less is known about extrasynaptic GABA(A)Rs mediating persistent or tonic inhibition and regulating neuronal excitability. Here, we recorded tonic currents in the basolateral (BLA) nucleus and the lateral (LA) nucleus of the amygdala. While all BLA principal cells expressed a robust GABAergic tonic current, only 70% of LA principal cells showed a tonic current. Immunohistochemical stainings revealed that the α3 GABA(A)R subunit is expressed moderately in the LA and strongly throughout the BLA nucleus, where it is located mostly at extrasynaptic sites. In α3 subunit KO mice, tonic currents are significantly reduced in BLA principal cells yet not in LA principal cells. Moreover, the α3 GABA(A)R-selective benzodiazepine site agonist and anxiolytic compound TP003 increases tonic currents and dampens excitability markedly in wild-type BLA principal cells but fails to do so in α3KO BLA cells. Interneurons of the LA and BLA nuclei also express a tonic current, but TP003-induced potentiation is seen in only a small fraction of these cells, suggesting that primarily other GABA(A)R variants underlie tonic inhibition in this cell type. Together, these studies demonstrate that α3 GABA(A)R-mediated tonic inhibition is a central component of the inhibitory force in the amygdala and that tonically activated α3 GABA(A)Rs present an important target for anxiolytic or fear-reducing compounds.     

Rodent doxapram model of panic: behavioral effects and c-Fos immunoreactivity in the amygdala.

BACKGROUND: Panic attacks, the hallmark of panic disorder, are often characterized by hyperventilation. Existing animal models of anxiety have not addressed the effects of the hyperventilation on anxiety-related behaviors. Doxapram is a respiratory stimulant that reliably evokes panic attacks in patients with panic disorder. We examined doxapram in four rodent models of anxiety and sought to identify brain regions involved in its behavioral effects. METHODS: The effects of doxapram were determined for cue and contextual fear conditioning, the open field test, and the social interaction test. The effect of doxapram on c-Fos-like immunoreactivity was examined in three brain regions. RESULTS: Doxapram at 4 mg/kg increased anxiety-related behaviors in all four anxiety models. An inverted U-shaped dose-response curve was identified for fear conditioning to cue. Doxapram induced c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the central nucleus of the amygdala but not the lateral nucleus or the nucleus tractus solitarius. CONCLUSIONS: Doxapram enhanced anxiety-related behaviors in four animal models of anxiety that involve conditioning or spontaneous avoidance. The effect of doxapram may result from activation of neurons in the amygdala. Doxapram, by inducing hyperventilation, may be a useful adjunct to existing animal anxiety models for improving validity for panic anxiety.     

Enkephalin co-expression with classic neurotransmitters in the amygdaloid complex of the rat

This study aimed at characterizing the neurotransmitter phenotype of enkephalin neurons in the rat amygdaloid complex. We first established the detailed distribution of vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 (VGLUT1 and -2) and glutamate decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) in the amygdala by using in situ hybridization. In the amygdaloid complex, GAD65 is strongly expressed in striatal-like divisions, namely, the anterior amygdaloid area, the central nucleus (CEA), the intercalated nuclei, and the dorsal part of the medial nucleus (MEA). VGLUT1 and -2 expression is mostly segregated to specific divisions of the amygdale, with VGLUT2 being expressed only in the MEA, the anterior cortical nucleus (COAa), and the anterior basomedial nucleus (BMAa), whereas VGLUT1 is expressed in all other divisions of the amygdala. Second, we assessed the co-expression of preproenkephalin (ppENK) with GAD65, VGLUT1, or VGLUT2 by using double fluorescent in situ hybridization. We found that ppENK mRNA co-localized exclusively with GAD65 in all striatal-like structures of the amygdaloid complex with the exception of the MEA, where ENK also co-localized with VGLUT2 mRNA. This co-localization is most apparent in the posteroventral part of the MEA, where 70% of ENKergic cells expressed VGLUT2. In addition, ppENK also co-localized with VGLUT1 because more than 95% of ENK cells in the basolateral amygdala expressed VGLUT1. In contrast, less than 25% of ENKergic cells expressed VGLUT1 in the lateral nucleus of the amygdale, with the majority of ENK cells expressing GAD65 mRNA in this nucleus. These results have broad implications for understanding the functional roles of enkephalinergic neurotransmission in the amygdaloid complex.     

Status Epilepticus Causes Selective Regional Damage and Loss of GABAergic Neurons in the Rat Amygdaloid Complex

In human epilepsy, the amygdala is often a primary focus for seizures. To analyse the status epilepticus-induced alterations in the amygdaloid circuitries which may later underlie epileptogenesis, we studied the amygdaloid damage in kainic acid and perforant pathway stimulation models of status epilepticus in the rat. We also studied the damage to inhibitory GABAergic neurons. In both models, the medial division of the lateral nucleus, the parvicellular division of the basal nucleus and portions of the anterior cortical and medial nuclei were damaged. In the kainate model, where the seizure activity was more severe, the accessory basal nucleus, amygdalohippocampal area, posterior cortical nucleus and periamygdaloid cortex were also damaged. Two weeks after kainate-induced seizures, 56% of the GABA-immunoreactive neurons remained in the lateral nucleus ( P < 0.05) and 25% in the basal nucleus ( P < 0.01). Further analysis showed that one subpopulation of damaged GABAergic neurons was immunoreactive for somatostatin (48% remaining in the lateral nucleus, P < 0.01; 33% in the basal nucleus, P < 0.01). In the perforant pathway stimulation model, the damage to somatostatin neurons was milder. According to our data, the initial insult, such as status epilepticus, selectively damages amygdaloid nuclei. The loss of inhibition may underlie the spontaneous generation of seizures and epileptogenesis. On the other hand, many amygdaloid output nuclei (magnocellular and intermediate division of the basal nucleus, the central nucleus) remained relatively undamaged, providing pathways for seizure spread and generation of seizure-related behavioural manifestations such as motor convulsions and fear response.