Effect of nonviral factors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis C (HCV) is now the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While graft reinfection remains universal, progression to graft cirrhosis is highly variable. This study examined donor, recipient, and operative variables to identify factors that affect recurrence of HCV post-OLT to facilitate graft-recipient matching. METHODS: Retrospective review of 307 patients who underwent OLT for HCV over a 10-year period at our center. Recurrence of HCV was identified by the presence of biochemical graft dysfunction and concurrent liver biopsy showing diagnostic pathologic features. Time to recurrence was the endpoint for statistical analysis. Five donor, 6 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect recurrence were analyzed by univariate comparison and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival in the 307 study patients was 69% and 34% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Four predictive variables related to either donor or recipient characteristics were identified. Advanced donor age, prolonged donor hospitalization, increasing recipient age, and elevated recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. Examination of HLA disparity between donors and recipients demonstrated no correlation between class I or class II mismatches and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified donor and recipient characteristics that significantly predict hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. These factors are identifiable before transplant and, if considered when matching donors to HCV recipients, may decrease the incidence of HCV recurrence after OLT. A change in the current national liver allocation system would be needed to realize the full value of this benefit.     

The impact of donor variables on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Morphologic characteristics of the graft have been proposed as a major contributor to the long-term outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Our objective was to determine the impact of donor variables, including donor age, donor-recipient HLA match, and type of donation (DCD vs donation after brain death [DBD]), on the outcome of OLT in 192 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Fourteen patients underwent OLT from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors and 188 from DBD donors. Mean donor age, warm ischemia time at recovery, and cold ischemia time were similar between the groups. Overall graft survival rate at 1 year (55% DCD vs 85% DBD) and 5 years (46% DCD vs 78% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0003). Similarly, patient survival rate at 1 year (62% DCD vs 93% DBD) and 5 years (62% DCD vs 82% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0295). Incidences of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and primary nonfunction were similar between the DCD and DBD groups. The incidence of liver abscess with ischemic-type biliary stricture was higher in recipients from DCD as compared with DBD (42% vs 2%). A trend toward lower graft survival was noted in recipients from donors older than 60 years of age in the HCV population (P = .07), with statistically lower patient survival (P = .02). Donor- recipient HLA matching did not appear to correlate with OLT outcome in patients with HCV. DCD donors and donors older than 60 years of age significantly impact patient and graft survival. Lower graft and patient survival in recipients from DCD donors does not appear to be related to early disease recurrence.     

A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors affecting the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to identify models that predict patient and graft survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The national epidemic of HCV infection has become the leading cause of hepatic failure that requires OLT. Rapidly increasing demands for OLT and depleted donor organ pools mandate appropriate selection of patients and donors. Such selection should be guided by a better understanding of the factors that influence the outcome of OLT. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 510 patients who underwent OLT for HCV during the past decade. Seven donor, 10 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect outcome were dichotomized at the median for univariate screening. Factors that achieved a probability value less than 0.2 or that were thought to be relevant were entered into a stepdown Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Overall patient and graft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84%, 68%, and 60% and 73%, 56%, and 49%, respectively. Overall median time to HCV recurrence was 34 months after transplantation. Neither HCV recurrence nor HCV-positive donor status significantly decreased patient and graft survival rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, use of HCV-positive donors reduced the median time of recurrence to 22.9 months compared with 35.7 months after transplantation of HCV-negative livers. Stratification of patients into five subgroups, based on time of recurrence, revealed that early HCV recurrence was associated with significantly increased rates of patient death and graft loss. Donor, recipient, and operative variables that may affect OLT outcome were analyzed. On univariate analysis, recipient age, serum creatinine, donor length of hospital stay, donor female gender, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status of recipient, and presence of hepatocellular cancer affected the outcome of OLT. Elevation of pretransplant HCV RNA was associated with an increased risk of graft loss. Of 15 variables considered by multivariate Cox regression analysis, recipient age, UNOS status, donor gender, and log creatinine were simultaneous significant predictors for patient survival. Simultaneously significant factors for graft failure included log creatinine, log alanine transaminase, log aspartate transaminase, UNOS status, donor gender, and warm ischemia time. These variables were therefore entered into prognostic models for patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: The earlier the recurrence of HCV, the greater the impact on patient and graft survival. The use of HCV-positive donors may accelerate HCV recurrence, and they should be used judiciously. Patient survival at the time of transplantation is predicted by donor gender, UNOS status, serum creatinine, and recipient age. Graft survival is affected by donor gender, warm ischemia time, and pretransplant patient condition. The authors' current survival prognostic models require further multicenter validation.     

Histological recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: Outcome and role of retransplantation.

Impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence on long-term outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is highly variable, and the role of retransplantation is still debated. From 1996 to 2003, 131 OLT with histologically proven HCV recurrence and 6 months of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. One and 5-yr overall survivals were 90.7 and 81.3%, respectively. The mean time of HCV recurrence was 10.1 +/- 6.2 months in patients whose donor's age was less than 70 yr old, and 6.6 +/- 4.7 in patients whose donor's age was more than 70 (P < 0.01). The mean time between OLT and HCV recurrence was 10.7 +/- 8.2 months among patients still alive, and 5 +/- 4.2 among the 20 who died (P = 0.02). In 16 (12.2%) patients, retransplantation was required for severe HCV recurrence; 5 are still alive and 11 (68.7%) died. The mean survival time was 16.2 +/- 6 months if re-OLT was performed within 12 months from first OLT, and it was 45.9 +/- 10 months if re-OLT was performed later (P < 0.01). In conclusion, donors older than 70 yr are at high risk of early HCV recurrence; expectancy of life is significantly reduced in case of histologically proven recurrence within 6 months. Outcome is quite dismal in patients with early HCV recurrence requiring retransplantation within 1 yr of first OLT.     

Orthotopic liver transplantation in adult patients with cadaveric grafts. Experience of the Fundeni Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation

We analyze the experience of the Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation from the Fundeni Clinical Institute (Bucharest, Romania) regarding orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in adult recipients, with whole liver grafts from cadaveric donors, between April 2000 (when the first successful LT was performed in Romania) and December 2004. This series includes 37 OLTs in adult recipients (16 women and 21 men, aged between 29-57 years--average 46 years). Other two LT with whole liver cadaveric grafts and two reduced-size LT were performed in children; also, in the same period, due to the acute organ shortage, other methods of LT were performed in 28 patients (21 living donor LT, 6 split LT and one "do mino" LT), that were not included in the present series. The indications for OLT were HBV cirrhosis--10, HBV+HDV cirrhosis--4, HCV cirrhosis--11, HBV+HCV cirrhosis--2, biliary cirrhosis--5, Wilson disease--2, alcoholic cirrhosis--1, non-alcoholic liver disease--1, autoimmune cirrhosis--1. With three exceptions, in which the classical transplantation technique was used, the liver was grafted following the technique described by Belghiti. Local postoperative complications occurred in 15 patients (41%) and general complications in 17 (46%); late complications were registered in 18 patients (49%) and recurrence of the initial disease in 6 patients (16%). Intrao- and postoperative mortality was 8% (3/37). There were two patients (5%) who died because of immunosuppressive drug neurotoxicity at more than 30 days following LT. Four patients (11%) died lately because of PTLD, liver venoocclusive disease, recurrent autoimmune hepatitis and liver venoocclusive disease, myocardial infarction, respectively. Thirty-four patients survived the postoperative period (92%); according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, actuarial patient-survival rate at month 31 was 75%.     

Impact of Donor Age on the Results of Liver Transplantation in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Recipients

Objective

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-cirrhosis is the most frequent indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) among adults in most European and American transplant centers. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of donor age on graft survival among HCV-positive cirrhotic transplant patients.

Materials and Methods

We performed an observational, retrospective study between March 1997 and December 2004, analyzing 340 liver transplantations. The patients were divided into 4 groups, considering whether the HCV infection was the indication for OLT and whether the age of the donor was older or younger than 48 years: group 1 (HCV, <48 years); group 2 (HCV, >48 years); group 3 (non-HCV, <48 years); and group 4 (non-HCV, >48 years).

Results

A univariate analysis showed that posttransplantation graft survival was clearly influenced by recipient HCV serologic status (P = .018). However, no graft survival differences were found when the analysis variable was age (>48 or <48 years). When both variables were studied, a positive HCV serology did not modify graft survival when the donor age was <48 years (P = .32), but had a statistically significant negative impact when the age was >48 years (P = .02).

Conclusions

The use of older donors for HCV recipients resulted in worse graft and patient survivals in our study. This difference in survival was not present in non-HCV recipients or when grafts for HCV recipients were procured from younger donors. Donor age <30 years was a protective factor for graft survival among HCV recipients.     

Effect of donor age on survival of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in the United States. Recent studies from selected centers have suggested that older donor age is associated with worse outcomes after transplantation for HCV. METHODS: We analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing Liver Transplant Registry database from April 1987 to March 2003 to examine predictors of death or retransplantation in patients with HCV. Univariate models for each predictor were evaluated. Factors significant in the univariate model were used to develop a multivariable model. RESULTS: Of 6,956 patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 1,527 (22.0%) died or received retransplants during the first year after transplant. Recipients with graft failure were older, had greater serum creatinine levels, and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis before transplant. Donors of patients with graft failure were older and more likely to have diabetes mellitus. In the multivariable regression model, predictors of graft failure at 1 year were donor age, recipient age, recipient creatinine greater than 2 mg/dL, and the requirement for mechanical ventilation for the recipient. CONCLUSIONS: Both older donor age and older recipient age plus markers of severity of disease, including requirement for mechanical ventilation and renal insufficiency, are negatively associated with survival after liver transplantation. These factors should be considered when assessing OLT recipient and donor candidacy in patients with HCV.     

Transplanting hepatitis C virus–infected hearts into uninfected recipients: A single‐arm trial

The advent of direct‐acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has generated tremendous interest in transplanting organs from HCV‐infected donors. We conducted a single‐arm trial of orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) from HCV‐infected donors into uninfected recipients, followed by elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment after recipient HCV was first detected (NCT03146741; sponsor: Merck). We enrolled OHT candidates aged 40‐65 years; left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and liver disease were exclusions. We accepted hearts from HCV‐genotype 1 donors. From May 16, 2017 to May 10, 2018, 20 patients consented for screening and enrolled, and 10 (median age 52.5 years; 80% male) underwent OHT. The median wait from UNOS opt‐in for HCV nucleic‐acid‐test (NAT)+ donor offers to OHT was 39 days (interquartile range [IQR] 17‐57). The median donor age was 34 years (IQR 31‐37). Initial recipient HCV RNA levels ranged from 25 IU/mL to 40 million IU/mL, but all 10 patients had rapid decline in HCV NAT after elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment. Nine recipients achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR‐12). The 10th recipient had a positive cross‐match, experienced antibody‐mediated rejection and multi‐organ failure, and died on day 79. No serious adverse events occurred from HCV transmission or treatment. These short‐term results suggest that HCV‐negative candidates transplanted with HCV‐infected hearts have acceptable outcomes.     

Selective Use of Older Adults in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Many centers are reluctant to use older donors (>44 years) for adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) due to concerns about possible increased morbidity in donors and poorer outcomes in recipients. Since 2000, 130 adult RLDLTs have been performed at our institution. Recipients were divided into those who received a right lobe graft from a donor ≤age 44 (n = 89, 68%; median age 30) and those who received a liver graft from a donor age >44 (n = 41, 32%; mean age 52). The two donor and recipient populations had similar demographic and operative profiles. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the severity and number of complications in older donors were similar to those in younger donors. No living donor died. Older donor allografts had initial allograft dysfunction compared to younger donors. Complication rates were similar among recipients in both groups but there was a higher bile duct stricture rate with older donor grafts (27% vs. 12%; p = 0.04). One-year recipient graft survival was 86% for older donors and 85% for younger donors (p = 0.95). Early experience with the use of selected older adults (>44 years) for RLDLT is encouraging, but may be associated with a higher rate of biliary complications in the recipient.     

Use of octogenarian livers safely expands the donor pool.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of recipients on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and the scarcity of donors contribute to recipient pretransplantation mortality. One important measure to increase the donor liver pool would be to accept the previously discarded donors who are more than 80 years old. METHODS: From November 1996 to May 1998, four liver grafts from octogenarian donors (89, 87, 82, and 85 years old, respectively) were used for OLT. Pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics and the evolution of recipients after OLT were analyzed. RESULTS: The donors did not present cardiac arrest or hypotension, and only low doses of vasopressors were required in three of them. Intensive care unit stay of the donors was from 12 to 24 hr. Cold ischemia time was from 4 hr to 8 hr 40 min. Mild microsteatosis was present in three donors and associated macrosteatosis of < 10% in one of these. Macroscopic appearance and consistency were normal in all four grafts. Posttransplantation evolution and follow-up were uneventful. Three recipients were alive and well at 24, 16, and 7 months; the second of these died at 16 months of recurrent viral C cirrhosis after a first OLT. CONCLUSIONS: The liver donor pool can be increased if liver grafts are accepted without an age limit but in good condition (hemodynamic stability, short intensive care unit stay, good liver function, soft consistency, cold ischemia time <9 hr, and no severe steatosis). Octogenarian donors should be individually assessed in the absence of these ideal conditions.     

Evaluation of the older cadaveric kidney donor: the impact of donor hypertension and creatinine clearance on graft performance and survival

BACKGROUND: The use of older donors for cadaveric renal transplantation (CRT) remains controversial because older donors are associated with decreased graft survival, yet offer the opportunity for donor pool expansion. We investigated the impact of two age-related donor factors, hypertension and calculated creatinine clearance (C(Cr)), as predictors of graft outcome in recipients of CRTs from donors > or =55 years of age. METHODS: We reviewed 33,595 recipients of CRTs reported to UNOS since 4/1/94, of which 4,732 were from donors aged > or =55 years. Outcome measures were graft survival, serum creatinine, and incidence of delayed graft function with 3 years of follow-up. We first analyzed the effect of hypertension on outcome from donors > or =55 years: 2679 donors had no hypertension, 1058 had hypertension < or =10 years, and 557 had hypertension > 10 years. Next, the effect of donor C(Cr) as a risk predictor was investigated. Based on this analysis, recipients of older donors were grouped into two cohorts for comparison: 2570 donors with C(Cr)<80 ml/min and 2162 donors with C(Cr) > or =80 ml/min. RESULTS: Actuarial graft survival from donors aged <55 years was 88.0, 83.4, and 78.5% at 1, 2, and 3 years, vs. 80.6, 73.5, and 65.3% from donors > or =55 years (P<0.0001). When stratified by hypertension, older donors hypertensive > 10 years had survivals of 77, 66, and 57% vs. 81, 73, and 65% from donors without hypertension (P<0.017) and 80, 74, and 66% from donors hypertensive <10 years (P<0.017). When stratified by C(Cr), older donors with C(Cr) <80 ml/min had survivals of 77, 69, and 62% vs. 83, 76, and 66% from donors with C(Cr) > or =80 (P<0.0001). Finally, older donors with both hypertension > 10 years and C(Cr) <80 ml/min had survivals of 77, 61, and 53%. CONCLUSIONS: Long-standing hypertension and low calculated creatinine clearance are risk factors for decreased graft survival of CRTs from older donors. When both factors are present, graft survival is significantly decreased.     

The use of liver grafts from donors with bacterial meningitis

BACKGROUND: The shortage of suitable donors for transplantation is a worldwide problem. The use of cadaveric donors with bacterial meningitis may be associated with an increased risk of sepsis. We report the results of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) from 33 such donors between 1989 and 1999. METHODS: The hospital records of recipients from cadaveric donors with meningitis (study group) were retrospectively reviewed and compared with matched recipients from cadaveric donors dying from causes other than meningitis (recipient-matched control group). RESULTS: A total of 34 recipients underwent 21 whole, 10 reduced, and 3 split liver transplants from 33 cadaveric donor livers with bacterial meningitis. The donor meningitis pathogens were Neisseria meningitidis (n=14), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=4), Haemophilus influenzae (n=1), Streptococcus species (n=2), and unknown (n=12). Twenty-seven patients had an elective OLT and seven patients had an emergency OLT. Adequate antimicrobial therapy before organ procurement and after transplant was administrated. The mean posttransplant follow-up was 37 months (range: 1 day-106 months). There was no difference in recipient and graft survival rates between the study and the recipient-matched groups. In the study group, there were no infectious complications caused by the meningeal pathogens. Overall patient survival rates were 79%, 76%, 72%, and 72% at 1, 6, 12, and 60 months, respectively. Graft survival was 77%, 70%, 65%, and 65% at 1, 6, 12, and 60 months, respectively. The survival rate in elective cases was significantly better than emergency cases (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation from donors with bacterial meningitis is a safe procedure provided both donors and recipients receive adequate antimicrobial therapy.     

Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts.

Studies have suggested that the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (HCV+) donor allografts has no impact on survival. However, no studies have examined the effect that HCV+ donor histology has upon recipient and graft survival. We evaluated the clinical outcome and impact of histological features in HCV patients transplanted using HCV+ livers. We reviewed all patients transplanted for HCV at our institution from 1988 to 2004; 39 received HCV+ allografts and 580 received HCV-negative (HCV-) allografts. Survival curves compared graft and patient survival. Each HCV+ allograft was stringently matched to a control of HCV- graft recipients. No significant difference in survival was noted between recipients of HCV+ livers and controls. Patients receiving HCV+ allografts from older donors (age > or =50 yr) had higher rates of graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.74) and death rates (hazard ratio, 2.63) compared to HCV- allograft recipients receiving similarly-aged older donor livers. Matched case-control analysis revealed that recipients of HCV+ allografts had more severe fibrosis post-liver transplantation than recipients of HCV- livers (P = 0.008). More advanced fibrosis was observed in HCV+ grafts from older donors compared to HCV+ grafts from younger donors (P = 0.012). In conclusion, recipients of HCV+ grafts from older donors have higher rates of death and graft failure, and develop more extensive fibrosis than HCV- graft recipients from older donors. Recipients of HCV+ grafts, regardless of donor age, develop more advanced liver fibrosis than recipients of HCV- grafts.     

Impact of age older than 60 years in living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was extended to adults in recent years and more recently to older patients. The impact of donor age, analysis of preoperative risk factors for older LDLT recipients, and comparison of the complication rate between older and younger recipients were analyzed. METHODS: Subjects included patients who underwent LDLT at Kyoto University Hospital from October 1996 to December 2005. Twenty-three donors were 60 years of age or older, and 411 were younger than 60 years of age. Fifty-two recipients were 60 years of age or older and 410 were younger than 60 years of age. RESULTS: Postoperative recovery of liver function for donors and recipient/graft survival were not influenced by donor age. Hospital stay was longer in the donors 60 years of age or older than those younger than 60 years of age (P=0.02). The 5-year survival rates were 78.7% in recipients 60 years of age or older and 69.3% in younger recipients (P=0.26). Among preoperative risk factors for recipient survival rate, fulminant hepatic failure and preoperative status in the intensive care unit were significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications for recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Selected right lobe donors from individuals who were 60 years of age or older showed a similar postoperative course compared with younger donors. Moreover, LDLT is feasible for patients 60 years of age or older who do not require care in the intensive care unit or do not have fulminant hepatic failure.     

Comparison of hepatitis C histological recurrence rates and patient survival between split and deceased donor liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists as to whether there is an increased severity or frequency of recurrent hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in recipients of adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) grafts. We sought to examine the time to histological recurrence and survival in HCV (+) patients who underwent split liver transplantation (SLT), which is technically similar to what occurs in the LDLT procedure. METHODS: Twenty four HCV (+) adult recipients were identified through the UNOS database as having had SLT procedures at three centers: Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Chicago, and University of California at Los Angeles. Of these, 17 patients with comprehensive data were matched to 32 HCV (+) patients who underwent whole deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) during the same time period. Outcome and time to initial HCV recurrence as documented by liver biopsy were assessed. Liver biopsy was performed when clinically indicated. RESULTS: Patients who had SLT were significantly older (P=.01). There was no difference in number of rejection episodes (P=.40). Fifteen of 17 SLT (88%) versus 24/32 DDLT (75%) patients had documented HCV recurrence by biopsy (P=.46). The time to median cumulative incidence of recurrence of HCV post-liver transplantation was 12.6 months (SLT) versus 39.8 months (DDLT) patients. There was no difference in survival between SLT and DDLT patients (47 vs 70 months, P=.62) nor in cumulative incidence of histological HCV recurrence at 1, 2, and 3 years (P=.198, .919, and .806, respectively). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the cumulative incidence of histological recurrence of HCV post-liver transplant or in survival between recipients of deceased donor and split liver transplants.     

Ischemic cholangiopathy after liver transplantation from controlled non-heart-beating donors-a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have shown that livers from controlled non-heart-beating-donors (NHBD) are associated with higher rates of primary failure and ischemic cholangiopathy of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as a complication of the prolonged warm ischemia. METHODS: This retrospective review of activities from 1999 to 2006 examined donor characteristics of age, liver function tests, warm ischemic time before (1WITa) and after cardiac arrest (1WITb), cold ischemic time (CIT) and transplant results. RESULTS: Eleven NHBD retrieved livers were transplanted from "ideal" donors except for one elderly donor (73 years). Of the 11 recipients, 3 developed biliary cholangiopathy (27%). There were no episodes of primary graft nonfunction, but one recipient displayed primary graft dysfunction. Two recipients died: one due to biliary complications with sepsis (long CIT >10 hours, fatty liver), and the other due to aspiration pneumonia and hypoxic brain damage with normal liver function. One recipient required retransplantation owing to ischemic cholangiopathy (1WITb 45 min) at 6 months after OLT with a good result. The other eight recipients are alive (observation period 72 to 14 months) including six with normal liver function, one with biopsy-proven biliary ischemia and one with recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis without biliary ischemic changes on biopsy. Among 164 heart-beating donors recipients transplanted in the same period, biliary complications occurred in 27 patients (16%), of whom 12 were leaks and 15 anastomotic strictures. CONCLUSION: NHBD were a good source for livers with reasonable early results. To avoid late complications especially ischemic cholangiopathy, caution is urged with the use of these organs as well as strict donor and ischemic time criteria.     

Long-term results for liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors maintained with chest and abdominal compression-decompression

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results after liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) using the method of chest and abdominal compression-decompression to maintain donors. METHODS: From December 1995 to November 2004, 10 NHBD were identified and maintained by means of the method of chest and abdominal compression-decompression until family and judicial permission were granted. Nine donors were Maastricht type II and one was type IV. RESULTS: The mean age of donors was 40.5 years and the mean time under cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was 80 minutes. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was performed using these 10 liver grafts after a mean cold ischemia time of 561.5 minutes. All patients developed good posttransplant function, except for one patient who presented with primary nonfunction corrected with retransplantation. This complication was directly related to a long CPR time (P < .01). After a mean follow-up of 57 months, only one patient died from a hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence. The rest of the patients have maintained good graft function over time. CONCLUSIONS: NHBD maintained with the method of chest and abdominal compression-decompression are a valid choice to increase the donor pool. Liver transplantation using these grafts has proven good long-term results, comparable to their heart-beating counterparts.     

Donor pool expansion in liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: The shortage of donors has made it necessary to consider older subjects, those with mild or moderate steatosis, and those who are HBcAb- or hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive as marginal donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1986 to January 2002, 690 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) were performed in 603 patients. In this series we used 68 donors older than 70 years, 51 with steatosis (38 mild, 12 moderate, and 1 severe), 44 were HBcAb-positive and 6 were HCV-positive. RESULTS: Of 68 grafts from donors older than 70 years, 65 were used as a first OLT. These grafts showed 3 PNF, 11 arterial complications, 12 re-OLTs, and 14 deaths with graft survival of 72.3% and 61.34% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. All patients who received the other 3 grafts, which were used for re-OLT, died between postoperative day 21 and 720. Among the 51 grafts with steatosis, we observed 2 PNF of those within the mild steatosis group and graft survival rates of 76.8% and 70.9% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Forty-four grafts from HBcAb-positive subjects were used in 18 HBsAg-negative and 26 HBsAg-positive recipients. Among the untreated patient group, 1 patient demonstrated hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection and 1 patient had de-novo HBV. No reinfection or de novo infections were observed in the 13 patients treated with immunoglobulin or in the 19 patients treated with lamivudine plus immunoglobulin, or in the only patient treated with lamivudine. Graft survival rates were 64.1% and 54.7% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Among who received 6 patients transplants from HCV-positive donors, we observed 1 recurrence of chronic hepatitis, 1 re-OLT for hepatic vein stenosis, and 1 PNF. CONCLUSION: Old donors, those with moderate steatosis, or those who are HBcAb- and HCV-positive can be safely used in selected recipients to reduce waiting list mortality.     

The older living kidney donor: Part of the solution to the organ shortage

BACKGROUND: Strategies to increase kidney transplantation are urgently needed. METHODS: We studied all (n = 73,073) first kidney-only transplant recipients in the United States between 1995 and 2003 to determine the incidence and outcomes of living donor transplantation as a function of donor age. Because 90% of living donors were <55 years, we defined older living donors as > or =55 years. Factors associated with transplantation from older living donors and the association of living donor age with allograft function and survival were determined. RESULTS: Recipients of older age, female gender, white race, and preemptive transplants had higher odds of older living donor transplantation. Older living donor transplantation was more likely from spousal donors rather than blood relatives, and more likely when a husband was the donor. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) one year after transplantation decreased with increasing donor age (P < 0.001). Graft survival from living donors > or =55 years was 85% and 76% at three and five years (compared to 89% and 82% with living donors <55 years, and 82% and 73% with deceased donors <55 years). In a multivariate model, the risk of graft loss with living donors 55-64 years was similar to that with deceased donors <55 years, while recipients from living donors 65-69 years (HR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7) and >70 years (HR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.6) had a higher relative risk of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes are excellent with living donors <65 years. Expanded use of older living donors may help meet the demand for transplantation.