Low-dose methotrexate treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term observations

Of 21 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who began to receive low-dose weekly methotrexate up to five years ago, 15 (71 percent) have continued to take this drug for a mean of 42 months and have received a mean total dose of 2,021 mg (range: 915 to 3,075). The clinical improvement noted at the first follow-up (11 months) was sustained throughout this follow-up period (42 months). Three patients (14 percent) have had complete clinical remission and nine others (43 percent) have had an excellent response. Methotrexate was discontinued in four patients between the first and second follow-up because of planned pregnancy (one), gastrointestinal toxicity (two), and fear of toxicity (one). Liver toxicity assessed in these 21 patients and four others receiving long-term methotrexate therapy revealed acute hepatitis in one and elevated transaminase levels in 12 (48 percent). Liver biopsy specimens in 17 patients after a mean of 1,950 mg of methotrexate (range: 915 to 3,125) revealed mild fibrosis in six and no cirrhosis. Methotrexate can continue to suppress rheumatoid synovitis over a prolonged period of time with minimal toxicity in most patients. Hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis due to methotrexate may be less common in rheumatoid arthritis than has been reported in psoriasis.     

Low-dose D-penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled, double-blind clinical trial

Two hundred twenty-five patients with active severe rheumatoid arthritis were admitted to a multiclinic, controlled, double-blind trial comparing the use of 500 mg D-penicillamine per day, 125 mg D-penicillamine per day, and placebo. One hundred seventy-one patients completed at least 30 weeks of therapy. The 500 mg D-penicillamine group demonstrated statistically significant improvement over the placebo group in grip strength, average circumference of swollen proximal interphalangeal joints, and patient assessment. While the trend was for greater improvement with the larger dose of D-penicillamine, there was no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups in duration of morning stiffness, walking time, physician's assessment, number of swollen joints, or scores for tender and swollen joints. The slight increase in efficacy of higher dose D-penicillamine was associated with increased toxicity.     

Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: safety of low dose corticosteroids.

Fear of inducing generalised osteoporosis is one reason why corticosteroids are withheld in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). No studies, however, have directly measured bone density in such patients at clinically relevant sites. To assess this risk we measured bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and femoral neck by dual photon absorptiometry in 84 patients with RA, 44 of whom had been treated with low dose prednis(ol)one (mean dose +/- SE 8.0 +/- 0.5 mg/day; mean duration of treatment 89.6 +/- 12.0 months). There were significant reductions in bone mineral density in patients treated with corticosteroids (lumbar 9.6%, p less than 0.001; femoral 12.2%, p less than 0.001) and in those who had not received corticosteroids (lumbar 6.9%, p less than 0.01; femoral 8.9%, p less than 0.001), but the differences between the two groups were not significant. We conclude on the basis of these studies that low dose oral corticosteroids do not increase the risk of generalised osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.     

Conversion from daily to alternate daily corticosteroids in rheumatoid arthritis.

An attempt was made to convert 24 patients on corticosteroid treatment from a daily to an alternate daily regimen. Ten patients were successfully converted, 11 failed to convert, and 3 had to be withdrawn for irrelevant reasons. A simple tetracosactrin stimulation test gave some indication of which patients were more likely to convert successfully. Success was not influenced by severity or duration of disease, nor by dose of duration of steroid therapy. Conversion did not influence various clinical and laboratory measures of undesirable steroid side effects, but the follow-up period was probably too short to judge this. The evidence of others suggests that conversion is worth attempting.     

Low-dose methotrexate compared with auranofin in adult rheumatoid arthritis

Weekly treatment with low-dose oral methotrexate (MTX) was compared with daily auranofin (AUR) treatment in a 36-week double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of 281 patients with active, adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Both treatment groups showed significant improvement by the usual measures of clinical efficacy. The response with MTX occurred earlier and was consistently greater than that with AUR. An intent-to-treat analysis showed significantly greater improvement (P < 0.01) with MTX for painful and swollen joint counts and physician and patient global assessments of disease activity. Adverse reactions were reported more frequently in the AUR group, and more AUR-treated patients were withdrawn from the study because of toxicity. MTX was thus more effective and better tolerated than AUR in this study.     

Low-dose methotrexate compared with auranofin in adult rheumatoid arthritis. A thirty-six-week, double-blind trial

Weekly treatment with low-dose oral methotrexate (MTX) was compared with daily auranofin (AUR) treatment in a 36-week double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of 281 patients with active, adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Both treatment groups showed significant improvement by the usual measures of clinical efficacy. The response with MTX occurred earlier and was consistently greater than that with AUR. An intent-to-treat analysis showed significantly greater improvement (P less than 0.01) with MTX for painful and swollen joint counts and physician and patient global assessments of disease activity. Adverse reactions were reported more frequently in the AUR group, and more AUR-treated patients were withdrawn from the study because of toxicity. MTX was thus more effective and better tolerated than AUR in this study.     

Genome scan meta-analysis of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: Genome scans for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have yielded inconsistent results. The absence of replication of linkage might be due to lack of power of individual studies. We performed a genome scan meta-analysis of published data to increase statistical power and to assess evidence for linkage of RA across genome scan studies. METHODS: Four RA whole-genome scans containing 767 families with 964 sibling pairs were included for the genome scan meta-analysis (GSMA). The GSMA method was applied to pool the results obtained from four genome scans. For each study, 120 genomic bins of approximately 30 centimorgans were defined and ranked according to maximum evidence for linkage within each bin. Bin ranks were weighted and summed across all studies. The summed rank for each bin was assessed empirically for significance using permutation methods. RESULTS: A total of nine bins lay above the 95% confidence level (P=0.05) and four bins were above the 99% confidence level (P=0.01) in the RA GSMA, suggesting that these bins contain RA-linked loci: bins 6.2, 6.4, 8.1, 18.3, 12.3, 12.2, 1.5, 6.3 and 16.2. The strongest evidence for linkage occurred on chromosome 6p22.3-6p21.1 (bin 6.2), containing the HLA region (P(sumrnk)=0.0000008). CONCLUSION: This RA GSMA confirmed the evidence for HLA loci as the greatest susceptibility factor to RA and showed evidence for linkage at non-HLA loci, such as chromosomes 1p, 6, 8p, 12, 16 and 18q, across studies. These data may provide a basis to carry out targeted linkage and candidate gene studies, particularly in the regions.     

Mineral metabolism and bone mineral content in rheumatoid arthritis. Effect of corticosteroids

An evaluation of mineral metabolism was performed in 41 patients with RA and the pertinent data were compared to bone mineral content in patients either untreated or treated with different doses of corticosteroids. Our study confirms that osteoporosis is a common finding even in rheumatoid patients never treated with corticosteroids. Moreover, in patients treated with such drug the loss of bone mineral content was related to the dosage rather than to the length of treatment. In all cases no overt biochemical derangement was observed. According to our study, parathyroid hormone does not seem to influence the development of osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis, while a relative deficiency of calcitonin along with an inadequate vitamin D metabolism could play some role.     

Low-dose methotrexate compared with azathioprine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A twenty-four-week controlled clinical trial

Forty-two patients with definite or classic rheumatoid arthritis entered a prospective 24-week, double-blind, parallel clinical trial, followed by an 18-month open phase. All subjects had active synovitis that was unresponsive to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications and conventional slow-acting antirheumatic drugs. Initial treatment with azathioprine (AZA), 100 mg/day, or methotrexate (MTX), 10 mg/week, orally, was adjusted at predefined intervals. Both treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement at week 24, compared with baseline status, in all 9 clinical outcome variables. There were no apparent statistically significant differences in these outcome variables between the 2 treatment groups. There was a trend toward a more marked and rapid improvement in the MTX-treated group. Radiologic evidence of progression of joint damage was similar in both treatment groups at 24 and 52 weeks. Four of the 42 patients (2 receiving MTX and 2 receiving AZA) discontinued the study because of side effects, and 1 MTX-treated patient withdrew because of personal reasons. Outcome measures at week 52 (open phase) were not statistically different from those at week 24. Twenty-three patients were still taking the medication at week 104. We found that AZA and MTX were similarly effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and that this beneficial effect was maintained for up to 2 years in most patients.     

Comparative effectiveness of biologics for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Our aim was to establish the comparative effectiveness of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) biologics, using a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The systematic review used randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with RA who failed treatment with conventional disease-modifying agents for rheumatoid disease (cDMARDs). We compared the effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, and rituximab to tocilizumab, a recent biologic with a different mechanism of action (anti-IL-6 receptor). A network meta-analysis (NMA) included the indirect and direct evidence previously selected. In total, 207 articles were included describing 68 RCTs. The NMA showed that tocilizumab monotherapy was superior to standard care (ACR20, OR 13.27, 95 % CrI [3.958, 43.98]; ACR50, 17.45 [10.18, 31.24]; ACR70, 37.77 [7.226, 216.3]; EULAR, 10.42 [1.963, 54.8]); and methotrexate (MTX; ACR50, OR 5.44 [4.142, 7.238]; ACR70, 7.364 [1.4, 30.83]; EULAR, 4.226 [1.184, 15.58]) at 26 weeks. Similarly, the combination of tocilizumab + MTX was significantly better than standard care/placebo and MTX alone for ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and EULAR at 26 weeks (OR 18.63 [5.32, 66.81]; 24.27 [14.5, 41.91]; 46.13 [10.08, 277]; 14.23 [2.493, 84.02]; 4.169 [2.267, 7.871]; 5.44 [4.142, 7.238]; 8.731 [4.203, 19.29]; 7.306 [4.393, 13.04], respectively). At 52 weeks, compared to MTX alone, tocilizumab + MTX was significantly better for ACR20 and ACR50 response. Few significant differences were found between tocilizumab (alone or in combination) and any other biologics. Results must be considered in context with the limitations of the available evidence. This NMA suggests that tocilizumab was superior to cDMARDs and as effective as other biologics for RA.     

Low-dose methotrexate treatment for oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis nonresponsive to intra-articular corticosteroids

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose (0.2 mg/kg) methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of children with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who do not respond to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and repeated intra-articular corticosteroid (IA) injections. Nineteen consecutive patients (age: 2–14 years, 18 females) with oligoarticular JIA were studied prospectively. Sixteen had a persistent course and three had an extended course of the disease. Patients were defined as nonresponders to IA injections if the duration of improvement following two consecutive injections was less than 4 weeks. These patients were offered low-dose oral MTX, administered once a week for at least 6 months. Of the 19 patients in this series, 2 responded to NSAIDs alone. Forty-eight IA injections were given to 17 patients; 11 (64%) of them did not respond to this treatment. Nine of the nonresponders were treated with low-dose MTX for a median duration of 15±3.8 months. Except for one patient with an extended disease course, all responded very well to treatment and went into remission after a median of 6.4±2.9 months, and none required additional IA injections after initiation of MTX treatment. Low-dose oral MTX appears to be very effective in the management of children with oligoarticular JIA, who are unresponsive to IA injections.