Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of atracurium and vecuronium neuromuscular blockade

To determine the potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by atracurium and vecuronium, dose-response curves were constructed for both antagonists when given at 10% spontaneous recovery of first twitch height. Ninety ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults were given either 0.4 mg/kg atracurium or 0.08 mg/kg vecuronium during thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg/kg) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another ten subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. Assisted recovery was defined as actual recovery minus mean spontaneous recovery observed in patients who were not given antagonists. First twitch recovery was initially more rapid when vecuronium was antagonized compared with atracurium, but no difference was detected after 10 min. At 10 min the neostigmine ED80 was 0.022 +/- 0.003 (SEM) mg/kg after atracurium and 0.024 +/- 0.003 mg/kg after vecuronium. The edrophonium ED80 was 0.44 +/- 0.11 mg/kg with atracurium and 0.46 +/- 0.12 mg/kg with vecuronium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio of 20. Atracurium train-of-four fade could be antagonized more easily with edrophonium, whereas that of vecuronium was more easily antagonized by neostigmine. It is concluded that edrophonium and neostigmine are not equally effective against atracurium and vecuronium.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of moderate and profound atracurium blockade

To measure the ability of neostigmine and edrophonium to reverse moderate and profound atracurium blockade, dose-response relationships were established for these reversal agents given at 1% and 10% twitch height recovery. Eighty-five ASA I and II adult patients received atracurium, 0.4 mg/kg, during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 seconds, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. Edrophonium, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg; neostigmine, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg; or no reversal agent was given when there was either 1% or 10% recovery of the first twitch response. With profound blockade, the slope of the edrophonium dose-response relationship was significantly flatter (P less than 0.05) than that of neostigmine. The dose of neostigmine required to achieve 80% first twitch recovery (ED80) after 10 minutes was 0.013 +/- 0.003 mg/kg (mean +/- SEM) if given at 10% recovery, and 0.032 +/- 0.004 mg/kg if given at 1% recovery. The ED80 for edrophonium was 0.22 +/- 0.04 mg/kg and 1.14 +/- 0.33 mg/kg, respectively. These values corresponded to neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 16.6 +/- 3.5 and 35.3 +/- 8.9 at 90% and 99% blockade respectively (P less than 0.006). We conclude that the relative potency of neostigmine is greater than that of edrophonium for antagonism of profound atracurium blockade.     

Edrophonium effectively antagonizes neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductors induced by rapacuronium, rocuronium and cisatracurium, but not mivacurium

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of antagonism of rapacuronium-, mivacurium-, rocuronium- and cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductors (LA). METHODS: One hundred four patients were randomly assigned to one of eight study groups. They either received rapacuronium 1.5 mg x kg(-1), mivacurium 0.25 mg x kg(-1), rocuronium 0.9 mg x kg(-1) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg x kg(-1). Patients in each treatment group either received edrophonium (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) at 10% recovery of the first twitch (T1) of train-of-four (TOF) at the LA or were allowed to recover spontaneously from neuromuscular block. The effect of antagonism on speed of recovery of neuromuscular function at the LA was evaluated. RESULTS: The time to recovery to a TOF ratio of 0.9 at the LA, when compared to the spontaneous recovery group, was significantly shortened by the administration of edrophonium in patients receiving rapacuronium [19.2 +/- 7.8 vs 26.2 +/- 4.9 (mean +/- SD) min], rocuronium (24.7 +/- 14.3 vs 44.4 +/- 13.0 min) and cisatracurium (24.2 +/- 5.7 vs 35.1 +/- 7.6 min). Edrophonium administration did not shorten complete recovery from mivacurium-induced block (15.7 +/- 8.0 vs 17.6 +/- 6.1 min). CONCLUSION: Recovery from rapacuronium-, rocuronium- or cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block to a TOF ratio of 0.9 as measured at the LA was shortened by the administration of edrophonium, when compared to spontaneous recovery.     

Tactile evaluation of train-of-four count as an indicator of reliability of antagonism of vecuronium- or atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Recent evidence suggests that edrophonium is not the agent of choice to reverse profound neuromuscular blockade but remains an efficacious drug when the level of neuromuscular blockade to be antagonized is modest. We studied 90 healthy adults in an attempt to address the questions: 1) How much variability in such neuromuscular parameters as single twitch height and the train-of-four (TOF) fade ratio (T4/T1) exist when the TOF count first returns to four palpable responses? 2) Is edrophonium a reliable antagonist at this measured point of recovery? 3) What is the optimal dose of edrophonium needed to produce prompt (less than 10 min) and satisfactory (T4/T1 greater than 0.7) reversal when the fourth response of the thumb to indirect TOF stimulation just becomes palpable? Patients were given a bolus atracurium or vecuronium (n = 45 in each group) followed by an iv infusion sufficient to maintain single twitch as measured by electromyography at 10-15% of control values. At the end of surgery, the infusion was terminated and spontaneous recovery was allowed to begin. Once the tactile TOF count was four, edrophonium 0.3, 0.5, or 0.75 mg/kg was administered. At a count-of-four the first twitch averaged 37% of control (+/- 8.5% standard deviation; pooled data from all groups) and the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.14 +/- 0.049. After atracurium neuromuscular blockade, edrophonium 0.3 mg/kg produced adequate antagonism in 10 min. At this time the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.79 +/- 0.07 and the lowest observed value was 0.67. Increasing the edrophonium dose to 0.75 mg/kg accelerated recovery by 4-5 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparison of edrophonium and neostigmine for the antagonism of atracurium-induced neuromuscular block

Edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, or neostigmine, 0.05 mg/kg, was administered to groups of 20 patients each, for antagonism of atracurium-induced block at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. Adequate reversal of neuromuscular block (TOF ratio of 0.7) was achieved in all patients given neostigmine but only in 13 of the 20 given edrophonium. The onset of action of edrophonium (23 sec) was significantly more rapid than that of neostigmine (40 sec), as was the time taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.7 in those in whom adequate antagonism was achieved (68 sec for edrophonium and 246 sec for neostigmine). Five of the seven patients in the edrophonium group who failed to be reversed adequately had shown three or fewer twitches to a TOF stimulation. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, particularly if all four responses to a TOF stimulation are not elicited prior to antagonism of the block.     

Comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effect of cisatracurium and atracurium on the larynx and the adductor pollicis

BACKGROUND: Cisatracurium unlike atracurium is devoid of histamine-induced cardiovascular effects and this alone would be the greatest advantage in replacing atracurium for the facilitation of tracheal intubation. On the other hand, 2 ED(95) doses of cisatracurium (100 micro g/kg) do not yield satisfactory intubating conditions such as those seen with equipotent doses of atracurium and therefore the recommended intubating dose of cisatracurium is 3 ED(95). To understand this discrepancy better, we evaluated the potency and onset of atracurium and cisatracurium directly at the larynx adductors in humans. METHODS: The study was conducted in 54 patients (ASA class I or II) undergoing peripheral surgery requiring general anesthesia. Cisatracurium 25-150 micro g/kg or atracurium 120-500 micro g/kg intravenous (i.v.) boluses doses were administered during anesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide, oxygen and fentanyl. Neuromuscular block was measured by electromyography (single twitch stimulation every 10 s) at the larynx and the adductor pollicis. The dose-response effect measured at both muscles included maximum neuromuscular blockade achieved (Emax), the time to maximum depression of twitch height (onset) and time to spontaneous recovery of the twitch height to 25%, 75% and 90% (T25, T75, T90) of control value. RESULT: The onset at the larynx was of 196 +/- 28 s after the 100 micro g/kg cisatracurium dose compared with 140 +/- 14 s after the 500 micro g/kg atracurium dose (P < 0.05). Emax at the larynx was 92 +/- 1% and 98 +/- 1% after 100 micro g/kg cisatracurium and 500 micro g/kg atracurium, respectively (P < 0.05). The time to onset of maximum suppression Emax = 100 +/- 0% after a 150 micro g/kg cisatracurium dose was 148 +/- 29 s. At the larynx, the ED(50) was 25 micro g/kg for cisatracurium and 180 micro g/kg for atracurium and the ED(95) was 87 micro g/kg for cisatracurium compared with 400 micro g/kg for atracurium. CONCLUSION: The slow onset time at the laryngeal muscles after cisatracurium can be explained by the higher potency as compared with atracurium.     

ANTAGONISM OF VECURONIUM AND ATRACURIUM: COMPARISON OF NEOSTIGMINE AND EDROPHONIUM ADMINISTERED AT 5% TWITCH HEIGHT RECOVERY

In 39 healthy patients antagonism, by neostig-mine 0.07 mg kg^–1or edrophonium 0.8 mg kg^–1, of neuromuscular blockadeinduced by vecuronium or atracurium, was compared. Reversalwas attempted when the height of the single twitch (TH) hadrecovered spontaneously to 5% of the control value. The evokedresponses, initially single twitch, then train-of-four (TOF)were observed until the TOF ratio was 70%. Induced recoveryfrom TH 5% to 25% was shorter following edrophonium than followingneostigmine with both vecuronium (P < 0.05) and atracurium(P < 0.05). The recovery indices and times until TH was 75%of control and until the TOF ratio was 70% were not different.The time from a TH of 75% to a TOF ratio of 70% was shorterfollowing neostigmine than following edrophonium with both vecuronium(P < 0.01) and atracurium (P < 0.01). Edrophonium hada much more variable effect on vecuronium than on atracurium.These results show that although the onset of action of edrophoniumwas faster than that of neostigmine, this did not lead to afaster clinical recovery, and antagonism by edrophonium maybe delayed in a number of patients if vecuronium is the neuromuscularblocker.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade

Neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 were administered to two groups of 15 patients each for antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 20% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. The mean onset of action (+/-SEM) of edrophonium (18.1 +/- 2.4 sec) was significantly more rapid (P less than 0.01) than that of neostigmine (47.6 +/- 4 sec), as were the times taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.25 and 0.5. Nevertheless, the reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the antagonist until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was significantly shorter (P less than 0.01) in the neostigmine than in the edrophonium group (499.3 +/- 62 vs 767 +/- 52 sec respectively). The TOF ratio ten minutes after reversal was greater in the neostigmine group than in the edrophonium group (P less than 0.01), 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs 0.68 +/- 0.02 min respectively. At that time, 33% (5 out of 15) and 80% (12 out of 15) patients failed to be reversed adequately (TOF ratio of 0.75) after neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 and edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. Administration of one additional dose (one-third of the initial dose) of the same antagonist resulted in adequate antagonism in the remaining five patients in the neostigmine group and in nine patients in the edrophonium group. Two such doses were required in the remaining three patients in the latter group. The mean total dose of neostigmine and edrophonium employed in this study was 0.067 +/- 0.002 and 1.3 +/- 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recovery times following edrophonium and neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium steady-state infusions

The ability of edrophonium and neostigmine to antagonize nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by steady-state infusions of atracurium, pancuronium, and vecuronium was studied in 71 adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and halothane. Infusion rates of blocking drugs were adjusted so that single twitch depression as measured by the evoked integrated EMG of the hypothenar muscles was kept at 10% of control. Two minutes after the termination of the infusion either edrophonium (0.75 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Single twitch depression and train-of-four (T4/T1) fade was recorded during the recovery period. T4/T1 fade ratios observed at 20 min postreversal were 0.80 (atracurium-edrophonium); 0.76 (vecuronium-edrophonium); 0.44 (pancuronium-edrophonium); 0.95 (atracurium-neostigmine); 0.89 (vecuronium-neostigmine); and 0.68 (pancuronium-neostigmine). Under conditions of this study neostigmine produced more rapid and complete recovery than did edrophonium. Although edrophonium produced adequate antagonism of atracurium if 20-30 min were allowed to elapse, edrophonium reversal of pancuronium was rarely acceptable even at 30 min. Increasing the dose of edrophonium to 1.0 mg/kg produced single twitch values of 0.90 at 5 min postreversal but did not increase the rate of recovery of the train-of-four fade ratio. Neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, on the other hand, generally produced T4/T1 ratios of greater than 0.70 in 20-30 min. Although the pattern of recovery seen after reversal of vecuronium was in general quite similar to that seen after atracurium, two patients in the vecuronium-edrophonium group showed delayed recovery and also failed to respond significantly to subsequent doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine,pyridostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of deep pancuronium blockade

To compare the ability of equipotent doses of neostigmine, pyridostigmine and edrophonium to antagonize intense pancuronium neuromuscular blockade, one hundred and twenty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery received 0.06 mg.kg-1 pancuronium during a thiopentone nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. In the first 60 patients, spontaneous recovery was allowed until ten per cent of initial first twitch height. Then neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg.kg-1), pyridostigmine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1 or 0.2 mg.kg-1), or edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg.kg-1) was injected by random allocation. Dose-response relationships were established from the measurement of first twitch height (T1) ten minutes later. From these, neostigmine, 0.04 and 0.08 mg.kg-1 was found to be equipotent to pyridostigmine, 0.2 and 0.38 mg.kg-1, and edrophonium, 0.54 and 1.15 mg.kg-1, respectively. These doses were given by random allocation to the next 60 patients, but at one per cent spontaneous recovery. Neostigmine, 0.04 mg.kg-1, produced a T1 of 73 +/- 4 per cent (mean +/- SEM), and a train-of-four ratio (TOF) of 39 +/- 3 per cent. This was significantly greater than with pyridostigmine, 0.2 mg.kg-1 (T1 = 50 +/- 6 per cent; TOF = 25 +/- 3 per cent), and edrophonium, 0.54 mg.kg-1 (T1 = 54 +/- 3 per cent; TOF = 17 +/- 2 per cent).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade

Speed of reversal of profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade following edrophonium (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.04 or 0.08 mg/kg) was measured using the train-of-four pattern of nerve stimulation. In all patients adequate clinical reversal was present when the ratio of the strength of the fourth to the first twitch (T4 ratio) was 0.5. Both doses of edrophonium were associated with a significantly faster speed of reversal than the smaller dose of neostigmine (p less than 0.05 in both cases). However, the larger dose of neostigmine was associated with a reversal time approaching that of edrophonium. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed in terms of contemporary theories of neuromuscular pharmacology.     

Factors predicting atracurium reversal time

BACKGROUND: To identify individual factors and combination of factors predictive of reversal time (defined as time from neostigmine administration to train-of-four (TOF) ratio 0.70) from atracurium-induced neuromuscular block, the present study tested the following variables as possible predictors of reversal time: 1) degree of block at the time of antagonism as quantified by first response to TOF or double-burst stimulation (DBS); 2) time from last supplemental dose of atracurium to administration of neostigmine (pre-reversal time); and 3) time from administration of initial atracurium dose to T1 (the magnitude of the first twitch in TOF) recovered to 10% (duration of action of the initial dose of atracurium). METHODS: The study population comprised 83 female patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2, anaesthetized with fentanyl, thiopental, halothane and nitrous oxide. Initial and supplemental doses of atracurium were 0.5 mg x kg(-1) and 0.15 mg x kg(-1), respectively. Evoked responses to TOF or DBS were recorded mechanomyographically. Neuromuscular block was antagonized with neostigmine, 0.07 mg x kg(-1), at varying time intervals (6-50 min) after the final atracurium dose. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analyses testing T1, D1 (the magnitude of the first twitch in DBS), pre-reversal time and duration of action of the initial dose of atracurium, demonstrated that with superficial block, T1 >15%, T1 is the only significant predictor for reversal time. With moderate block, 0< T1 < or =15%, both T1 and duration of action of the initial atracurium dose are significant predictors for reversal time. With profound block, T1=0, duration of action of the initial dose and pre-reversal time are significant predictors for reversal time. CONCLUSION: 1) T1 is a more important predictor for reversal time from atracurium-induced neuromuscular block than D1; 2) predictors differ with the degree of block: with T1 > 15%, T1 is the only significant predictor; with 0< T1 < or =15%, the duration of action of the initial dose and T1 are predictors for reversal time; with T1=0, the duration of action of the initial dose and pre-reversal time predict reversal time.     

Edrophonium antagonism of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block: dose requirements in children and adults

This randomized, controlled study compared edrophonium dose requirements to antagonize cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block in children and adults. Sixty children, aged two to 10 years, and 60 adults aged 20 to 60 years, all subjects ASA physical status 1 or 2, having propofol, fentanyl and isoflurane-N2O anaesthesia, were studied. Cisatracurium 0.1 mg x kg(-1) was given for muscle relaxation. Neuromuscular block was monitored with accelerometry. Edrophonium 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg x kg(-1) or no anticholinesterase (controls) was given by random allocation to antagonize 90% neuromuscular block in each of the study groups (n=12). Atropine 5 to 10 microg x kg(-1) was given according to edrophonium dose. Onset time of cisatracurium-induced block in children was mean (SD) 2.4 (0.8) versus 4.1 (2.3) minutes in adults, P<0.01. The times to 10% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) were respectively, 28.4 (5.2) and 41.8 (6.1) minutes in children and adults, P<0.01. Spontaneous and antagonist assisted neuromuscular recovery was more rapid in children. Adequate neuromuscular recovery (train of four (TOF) ratio 80%) was achieved in children at 3 and 10 minutes after edrophonium 1.0 mg kg(-1) and 0.4 mg x kg(-1), respectively. A TOF ratio of 80% was not achieved, within 10 minutes, with any of the four dose levels of edrophonium in adults. The dose of edrophonium to achieve a TOF ratio of 80% (ED(TOF-80)) after 5 and 10 minutes in children were, respectively, mean (SD) 0.85 (0.38) and 0.38 (0.19) mg x kg(-1). The equivalent ED(TOF-80) in adults was outside the edrophonium dose range studied.     

Time to peak effect of neostigmine at antagonism of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Study Objective: (1) To determine the time to peak effect of neostigmine (time to peak antagonism) during atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block; and (2) to determine the effect on time to peak effect of neostigmine during atracurium-induced neuromuscular block, when the dose of neostigmine is increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical study.

Setting: Gynecologic operating room suite at a university hospital.

Patients: 45 ASA I and II women admitted for gynecologic laparotomy.

Interventions: Anesthesia was performed with thiopental sodium, fentanyl, halothane, nitrous oxide, and atracurium or vecuronium. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and mechanomyography were used to monitor neuromuscular transmission. Neostigmine was administered while a constant degree of neuromuscular block was maintained at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11% of the control twitch height, using a continuous infusion of atracurium or vecuronium. The patients were randomized to three groups, with 15 patients in each group. Group 1 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; group 2 received vecuronium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; and group 3 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 70 μg/kg.

Measurements and Main Results: The degree of neuromuscular block at antagonism was similar in the three groups. Time to peak effect (mean ± SD) on TOF ratio was significantly longer in Group 1 (9.7 ± 3.0 minutes) versus Group 2 (6.6 ± 1.4 minutes; (p < 0.05). The time to peak effect on TOF ratio during atracurium-induced block was reduced from 9.7 ± 3.0 minutes to 6.3 ± 2.0 minutes when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg (p < 0.05). The peak effect on TOF ratio was significantly greater in Group 3 compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05), while it was similar in groups 1 and 2.

Conclusion: The time to peak effect of neostigmine 35 μg/kg is about 6 to 10 minutes when antagonizing a constant degree of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11%. Even though the time to peak effect was longer with atracurium than with vecuronium, clinically significant differences between the antagonizing effect of atracurium versus vecuronium block were not demonstrated. The time to peak effect during atracurium-induced block decreased when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.     

Does discontinuation of desflurane at the time of neostigmine administration speed recovery from cisatracurium block compared to that with a propofol‐based technique?

BACKGROUND: Volatile anaesthetics are known to influence the effect of neostigmine as an antagonist of neuromuscular block. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether discontinuation of desflurane at the time of neostigmine administration shortens reversal time from cisatracurium block, compared to that with a propofol-based anaesthesia. METHODS: Ten volunteers were studied twice. For one study, anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil and propofol and maintained with nitrous oxide 70% and propofol 150 microg. kg-1. min-1. For the other study, experimental conditions were replicated except that desflurane 6% was administered and the dose of propofol was only 50 microg. kg-1. min-1. The evoked mechanical response of the adductor pollicis to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation was recorded. Neuromuscular block was induced with cisatracurium 0.2 mg. kg-1. When the magnitude of the first TOF response (T1) had recovered to 10%, the block was antagonized with neostigmine 70 microg. kg-1. At this time, propofol was decreased to 50 microg. kg-1. min-1, or the desflurane was discontinued. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two techniques of anaesthesia in the rate of neostigmine-induced recovery of the TOF ratio. The times (mean+/-SD) to achieve TOF ratios of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 were (propofol first, desflurane second) 6.1+/-2.2 and 6.5+/-1.6 min; 10.4+/-4.2 and 9.6+/-2.7 min; 17.1+/-6.9 and 21.0+/-13.0 min, respectively. CONCLUSION: Discontinuing desflurane does not speed neostigmine-induced recovery from cisatracurium neuromuscular block, when compared to that during propofol-based anaesthesia.     

Intubating conditions after pipecuronium bromide: the influence of dose and time.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the intubating conditions following the administration of pipecuronium bromide in doses of two (0.07 mg/kg) or three (0.1 mg/kg) times ED95 (average dose that gives 95% block of the first twitch). DESIGN: To compare intubating conditions at 11/2 and 21/2 minutes in 41 patients receiving balanced anesthesia. SETTING: Surgical patients at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-one patients undergoing surgical procedure who received general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: After obtaining a stable baseline of train-of-four (TOF), 41 patients randomly received either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg of pipecuronium as a single intravenous (IV) bolus dose, and the trachea was intubated either at 11/2 or 21/2 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intubating conditions at 21/2 minutes appeared significantly better than those at 11/2 minutes, regardless of the pipecuronium dose. The mean time for T1 (first twitch of TOF) to reach 50% and 90% suppression was 1.36 +/- 0.51 minutes and 2.29 +/- 0.8 minutes, respectively, for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 1.07 +/- 0.27 minutes and 1.72 +/- 0.45 minutes, respectively, for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. This did not make a significant difference in intubating conditions at either time. The time to 25% recovery of T1 was 68.2 +/- 22 minutes for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 121.5 +/- 49 minutes for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. In patients who had spontaneous recovery of T1 to between 10% and 25% of control, administration of neostigmine or edrophonium resulted in identical recovery in 10 minutes. However, in patients with less than 10% spontaneous recovery of T1, neostigmine appeared to be superior to edrophonium. CONCLUSION: Pipecuronium has a relatively rapid onset. The trachea could be intubated successfully in 11/2 minutes with a dose of either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg. If the clinical situation requires perfect relaxation with no movement or bucking, we recommend waiting at least 21/2 minutes.     

Total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium in end-stage renal failure

PURPOSE: To compare recovery parameters of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol, hemodynamic responses to perioperative events, and pharmacodynamic parameters of cisatracurium in 22 end-stage renal failure and 22 normal renal function patients. METHODS: Anesthesia was induced with 2-3 mg x kg(-1) propofol and 1 microg x kg(-1) remifentanil and maintained with 75 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) propofol and propofol initial infusion of 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) propofol. Arterial pressure and heart rate were maintained by remifentanil infusion rate adjustments. The first twitch (T1) was maintained at 25% by an infusion of cisatracurium. RESULTS: There was no difference in the time to maintenance of adequate respiration, date of birth recollection, first analgesic administration, between the renal failure (4.8+/-2.5, 7.8+/-3.2, 12.3+/-5.3 min respectively) and the control group (5.2+/-2.8, 8.1+/-3.1, 12.7+/-5.5 min): nor were there any differences in the time to 25% T1 recovery, T1 recovery from 25% to 75%, or cisatracurium infusion rate between the renal failure group (32.1 +/-10.8 min, 18.2+/-5.5 min, 0.89+/-0.29 microg x kg(-1) min(-1) respectively) and the control group (35.9 (7.9 min, 18.4+/-3.8 min, 0.95+/-0.22 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). CONCLUSION: End-stage renal failure does not prolong recovery from TIVA with remifentanil and propofol, or the recovery from cisatracurium neuromuscular block.     

The Maximum Depth of an Atracurium Neuromuscular Block Antagonized by Edrophonium to Effect Adequate Recovery

Background: The inability of edrophonium to rapidly reverse a deep nondepolarizing neuromuscular block may be due to inadequate dosage or a ceiling effect to antagonism of neuromuscular block by edrophonium. A ceiling effect means that only a certain level of neuromuscular block could be antagonized by edrophonium. Neuromuscular block greater than this could not be completely antagonized irrespective of the dose of edrophonium administered. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a ceiling effect occurred for antagonism of an atracurium-induced neuromuscular block by edrophonium and, if so, the maximum level of block that could be antagonized by edrophonium.

Methods: In 30 adult patients, atracurium was administered to maintain a constant neuromuscular block. The level of block varied between patients. Evoked adductor pollicis twitch tension was monitored. Incremental doses of edrophonium were administered while the infusion of atracurium continued. Increments were given until adequate recovery occurred, as defined by a train-of-four (TOF) ratio greater or equal to 70%, or until no further antagonism of the block could be achieved. The probability of being able to effect adequate recovery by antagonism with edrophonium was determined using a logistic regression model. Cumulative dose-response curves were constructed using the logit transformation of the neuromuscular effect versus the logarithm of the cumulative dose of edrophonium.

Results: In 14 patients with a block of 25-77% depression of the first twitch response, antagonism by edrophonium to a TOF ratio greater or equal to 70% was possible, whereas in 16 patients with a 60-92% depression of T1, a TOF ratio > 70% was not achievable, indicating that a ceiling effect for antagonism by edrophonium occurred. A block of 67 plus/minus 3% (mean plus/minus SE) had a 50% probability of adequate antagonism. In patients in whom block was antagonized to a TOF ratio < 70%, 95% of the peak antagonistic effect occurred with an edrophonium dose of 0.8 plus/minus 0.33 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 (mean plus/minus SD).