在移植肾功能稳定的受者中主动撤除环孢素A的临床研究

目的 研究在移植肾功能稳定的受者中主动撤除环孢素A(CSA)对急性排斥反应发生率及肾功能的影响.方法 选择35例肾功能稳定的肾移植受者,其中尸体肾移植23例,亲属活体肾移植12例.除2例为再次肾移植外,其余均为初次肾移植.分别在肾移植术后6个月～6年时停用CsA,平均为术后(13.3±9.1)个月.撤除CsA后免疫抑制方案为:霉酚酸酯(MMF)+西罗莫司(SRL)+泼尼松(Pred).撤除CsA前有9例做了移植肾穿刺活检,8例测定了抗HLA抗体.结果 对35例受者随访6个月～4.5年,平均14.8个月.撤除CsA前、后血肌酐平均值分别为(88.1±15.5)μmol/L和(92.3±23.7)/μmol/L(P0.05).撤除CsA后,有2例经活检证实发生急性排斥反应,治疗后均逆转;CsA所致的毒副作用,如牙龈增生、糖耐量异常和多毛症等明显改善.9例移植肾活检中,有3例肾功能正常的受者已出现轻度慢性移植肾肾病表现.抗HLA抗体检测中,7例阴性者在撤除CsA前、后肾功能无明显变化.1例抗HLA抗体呈强阳性者在撤除CsA后进展为慢性移植肾肾病,恢复血液透析.结论 对移植肾功能稳定的受者在移植6个月后撤除CsA,转换为"霉酚酸酯+西罗莫司+泼尼松"的免疫抑制方案是安全的,不增加急性排斥反应风险;撤除CsA有利于消除一些与其相关的毒副作用;对抗HLA抗体呈强阳性者.撤除CsA后很难改变肾功能的进展.     

Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on kidney graft function and body weight in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the most common cause of late graft loss. A beneficial effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on CAN was observed, although, due to the loss of body weight (BW) under MMF, serum creatinine (sCr) and reciprocal sCr may be unsuitable markers of graft function. METHODS: In 17 kidney transplant patients with CAN, azathioprine (Aza) was replaced by MMF. The remaining therapy was not changed; specifically, the cyclosporine (CsA) dose was not decreased. The mean values and regression coefficients of reciprocal sCr, CCr, urinary creatinine excretion (uCr x V), proteinuria, BW, blood pressure (BP), serum cholesterol (sChol), and serum triglycerides (sTG) versus time were analyzed 12 months before and after institution of MMF by a paired-comparison t test. RESULTS: The mean regression coefficient of reciprocal sCr differed significantly before and after conversion to MMF (mean -0.01 +/- 0.01 vs +0.012 +/- 0.029 mg/dL per month), suggesting improved graft function. However, the mean values of BW (74 +/- 15 vs 71 +/- 15 kg, P <.001) and uCr x V (1152 +/- 321 vs 1065 +/- 266 mg per 24 hours, P=.0897) decreased, making the increase in CCr less significant (mean -1.16 +/- 2.69 vs 0.40 +/- 1.79 mL/min per month, P <.05). BP, sChol, sTG, and proteinuria before and after conversion did not differ significantly. Among patients with long-term stable graft function at 36.5 +/- 16.9 months after conversion to MMF there was an almost significant improvement in renal protein excretion. CONCLUSIONS: MMF improved graft function, although this effect was overestimated using reciprocal sCr. Other risk factors, such as BP, sChol, and sTG, showed no significant differences, suggesting that MMF accounted for the improvement in CAN. The course of proteinuria under MMF seems to be of prognostic significance.     

Cyclosporine withdrawal in stable renal transplant recipients after azathioprine-mycophenolate mofetil conversion

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine A (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a nonimmunologic factor of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) in kidney transplant recipients. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may allow CsA dosage reduction or even complete withdrawal in selected populations with CsA nephrotoxicity or CAD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CsA withdrawal after azathioprine (AZA)-MMF conversion in a population of stable renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Twenty-eight first cadaver kidney recipients were included. AZA was then discontinued, MMF was introduced and after 4 months CsA was completely withdrawn. All patients underwent inuline clearance measurement and renal biopsy at inclusion and at the end of the follow-up (40 wk). RESULTS: CsA was completely discontinued in 20 patients. No patient lost his graft during the study period, but 1 patient experienced a reversible acute rejection episode. Inuline clearance improved significantly in the whole series. At the end of follow-up, histological worsening was observed in 50% of patients without any specific risk factor. In these patients, inuline clearance did not improve. Systolic blood pressure, the need for anti-hypertensive drugs and HDL cholesterol improved. CONCLUSION: In stable kidney transplant recipients, CsA withdrawal after AZA replacement by MMF switch was safe with regard to acute rejection. It improved blood pressure and the lipid profile, but, in 50% of patients was associated with histologic deterioration.     

Randomized study on the conversion of treatment with cyclosporine to azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil followed by dose reduction

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) in kidney transplantation has improved early graft survival. However, its long-term use is associated with impairment of renal function and increased cardiovascular risk factors. To avoid CsA-related long-term adverse effects, patients were converted to either azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 year after transplantation. METHODS: Between September 1995 and January 1997, 64 stable renal transplant recipients on CsA and prednisone treatment were included in a prospective, randomized study. Patients were randomized for conversion of CsA to 2 mg/kg AZA (n=30) or 1 g of MMF twice daily (n=34). All patients remained on low-dose steroids. To decrease the total immunosuppressive load, a dose reduction in MMF and AZA was performed at 4 and again at 8 months after conversion. Mycophenolic acid trough levels were measured at regular intervals. RESULTS: After conversion, a decrease in serum creatinine was found for both groups: for MMF, 132 to 109 micromol/L (P=0.016); and for AZA, 123 to 112 micromol/L (P<0.0001). After conversion, more acute rejections occurred in the AZA group (11/30) compared to the MMF group (4/34) (P=0.04). Dose reduction of MMF to 500 mg twice daily and of AZA to 1.0 mg/kg elicited three rejections in both groups. The incidence of side effects and infections were similar. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of CsA spared renal function. In patients converted to MMF significantly less rejections occurred compared to patients converted to AZA. Furthermore, dose reduction of both AZA and MMF is possible in the majority (72%) of the patients.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at 2 years

BACKGROUND: A previous report described the 1-year results of a prospective, randomized trial designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants in kidney transplantation. Recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were treated with tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine oral solution (modified) (CsA)+MMF, or tacrolimus+azathioprine (AZA). Results at 1 year revealed that optimal efficacy and safety were achieved with a regimen containing tacrolimus+MMF. The present report describes results at 2 years. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, or tacrolimus+AZA. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function. Patients were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: The results at 2 years corroborate and extend the findings of the previous report. Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing tacrolimus experienced improved kidney function. New-onset insulin dependence remained in four, three, and four patients in the tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, and tacrolimus+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients with delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis who were treated with tacrolimus+MMF experienced a 23% increase in allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (P=0.06). Patients randomized to tacrolimus+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF compared with those administered CsA+MMF. CONCLUSIONS: All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.     

Randomized trial of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine 6 months after renal allograft transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In the first year after renal allograft transplantation, triple therapy immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), prednisone (P), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to a triple therapy treatment that includes azathioprine (AZA) instead of MMF. Whether long-term treatment with CsA-P-MMF is better than treatment with CsA-P-AZA is a matter of debate, as 3-year graft survival is similar in MMF- and AZA-treated patients. The purpose of the present study was to examine the short-term effect of changing MMF to AZA in low-risk renal allograft recipients 6 months after transplantation. METHOD: This was a randomized, open-label single-centre study, recruiting 48 low risk renal allograft recipients on CsA-P-MMF therapy 6 months after transplantation, comparing the outcome with continued MMF treatment (2 g b.i.d.) (group A, n=22) or switching MMF to AZA (1 mg/kg) treatment (group B, n=26). RESULTS: The outcome after a 6-months follow-up of patients in group A and group B was similar. Treatment failure rates (defined as clinically diagnosed acute rejection episodes) were 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B. There were no patient deaths and no graft failures during the 6-months observation period. Graft function was excellent and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Replacing MMF with AZA 6 months after transplantation in low-risk renal allograft recipients is safe and is not associated with altered graft function in the short term.     

Pediatric Lung Transplant Outcomes Based on Immunosuppressive Regimen at Discharge: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-World Evidence From the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

BackgroundThis retrospective analysis of the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was undertaken to obtain real-world evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients to support a supplemental New Drug Application.MethodsOverall, 725 pediatric recipients of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for up to 3 years post-transplant based on an immunosuppressive regimen at hospital discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC)+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC+azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA)+MMF, or CsA+AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 year post-transplant, calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsThe use of TAC+MMF increased over time. During 2010 to 2017, 91.7% of pediatric lung transplant recipients were receiving TAC+MMF at the time of discharge. The proportion of recipients continuing their discharge regimen at 1 year post-transplant was 83.7% with TAC+MMF and 40.4% to 59.7% with the other regimens. Cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant was 7.7% with TAC+MMF, 13.9% with TAC+AZA, 8.9% with CsA+MMF, and 9.1% with CsA+AZA. There was no significant difference in the risk of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant between groups from 1999 to 2005 (the only era when adequate numbers on each regimen allowed statistical comparison). No increase in hospitalization for infection or malignancy was seen with TAC+MMF.ConclusionThe real-world evidence from the US database of transplant recipients supported the Food and Drug Administration's approval of tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients.     

Lower Incidence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 1 Year Post-Transplantation in Patients Treated with Mycophenolate Mofetil

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the main cause of graft failure after the first year of transplantation. This prospective, centrally randomized, open-label study was conducted to examine the possibility that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can prevent the emergence of CAN. The incidence of biopsy-proven CAN at 1 year was compared between two cyclosporine-based regimens comprising either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA). The AZA group (n = 34) and the MMF group (n = 37) were balanced for all baseline characteristics of donors and recipients, the pre-existence of renal lesions on donor biopsy, the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the number of patients with CAN at 1 year post-transplantation was significantly reduced in the MMF group (17/37-46%) compared with the AZA group (24/34-71%) (p = 0.03). When observed data were considered, 56/71 (78.8%) patients had a 1-year biopsy, and the number of patients with CAN was significantly lowered in the MMF group (9/29-31%) compared with the AZA group (17/27-63%) (p = 0.01). These results suggest a beneficial effect of MMF on the incidence of CAN at 1 year post-transplantation.     

Cyclosporin withdrawal with concomitant conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy: a 2-year follow-up

Because recent large studies have demonstrated that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to azathioprine (AZA) as a post-transplant immunosuppressant, it has been speculated that MMF could have a cyclosporin (CsA)-sparing effect in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft dysfunction. Between April 1996 and October 1998, 31 patients with chronic allograft dysfunction were assigned to have conversion from AZA to MMF with concomitant CsA withdrawal. Patient and graft outcomes were analysed. Mean follow-up time after MMF conversion was 27+/-11 months. Serum creatinine concentration (sCt) significantly decreased after conversion and remained stable at the end of follow-up (227+/-31 micro mol/l vs. 185+/-50 micro mol/l; P<0.0005). Mean variation in sCt was -24% after conversion, whereas it was +20% in the year before conversion ( P<0.001). There was a significant inverse relationship between proteinuria at baseline and improvement in renal function (r=-0.35; P=0.01). Proteinuria increased during follow-up (0.79+/-0.6 vs. 1.79+/-1.08 g/day; P=0.04). Isolated CsA nephropathy was associated with the best outcome. Renal function significantly improved in patients with grade 1 chronic rejection and remained stable in patients with grade 2 chronic rejection. Two patients (6.5%) experienced late acute rejection, respectively 13 and 24 months after CsA withdrawal. Eight patients (29%) experienced systemic infections requiring hospitalization. Blood pressure control and lipid profile improved after conversion. CsA withdrawal with a concomitant switch from AZA to MMF allows a substantial and durable improvement in renal function. Both allograft histology and proteinuria at baseline are predictive of the evolution of renal function after conversion. Physicians should consider the risk of over-immunosuppression possibly associated with this therapeutic strategy.     

Sirolimus attenuates the rate of progression of early chronic allograft nephropathy

Optimal treatment for patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is not known. Early intervention is preferred. We examined the benefit of adding sirolimus (SRL; C(0) 5-12 ng/mL: HPLC) on the rate of progression of early CAN. We identified patients with biopsy-confirmed Banff grade 1 CAN. After biopsy, patients were switched to SRL + CsA + prednisolone (SRL), MMF + CsA + prednisolone (MMF), or CsA + AZA + prednisolone (AZA). GFR was estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulae. The rate of GFR decline (delta GFR) was determined by calculating the slope of the regression line of estimated GFR (MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault method) at different times. Statistical analysis was performed by the Wilcoxon test. The 41 patients with CAN grade 1 were assigned to SRL: MMF: AZA = 12: 20: 9. Before biopsy; the graft age for SRL: MMF: AZA were 56 +/- 27: 70 +/- 48: 51 +/- 36 months; and the GFR (MDRD method), 38 +/- 8: 42 +/- 15: 36 +/- 14 mL/min; GFR (C-G method) 45 +/- 13, 42 +/- 12, 41 +/- 15 mL/min; trough CsA levels 152 +/- 36: 145 +/- 46: 177 +/- 61 ng/dL; delta GFR (MDRD method) -0.18 +/- 0.20: -0.15 +/- 0.59: -0.20 +/- 1.08; delta GFR (C-G method) -0.13 +/- 0.37: -0.19 +/- 0.24: -0.65 +/- 0.99. Follow-up time for SRL: MMF: AZA was 19 +/- 4: 35 +/- 32: 59 +/- 54 months. At last follow-up; GFR (MDRD method) for SRL: MMF: AZA were 39 +/- 13: 35 +/- 21: 40 +/- 24 mL/min; GFR (C-G method) 46 +/- 17, 37 +/- 18, 46 +/- 25 mL/min; BP 128 +/- 11/79 +/- 7: 131 +/- 22/80 +/- 14: 132 +/- 20/82 +/- 11 mm Hg; and CsA level 52 +/- 25: 122 +/- 41: 155 +/- 49. After biopsy, statin was prescribed in nine SRL, 10 MMF, and three AZA. ACEI was prescribed in two SRL, three MMF, and two AZA. Compared with the prebiopsy values, the delta GFR (MDRD method) changed to -0.04 +/- 0.31 (SRL; P = .04), -0.17 +/- 0.40 (MMF; P = .60), and -0.97 +/- 1.52 (AZA: P = .16). Delta GFR (C-G method) was also significantly improved in the SRL group (-0.02 +/- 0.47; P = .05) but not in the MMF (-0.13 +/- 0.51; P = .53) or AZA (-0.54 +/- 1.78; P = .44). We concluded that patients with early CAN who are switched to SRL and low-dose CsA have a significant attenuation of the rate of GFR declination when compared with patients who receive MMF or AZA addition.     

Infectious complications in geriatric renal transplant patients: comparison of two immunosuppressive protocols

BACKGROUND: It has been well documented that a regimen of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) reduces the incidence of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients, as compared with previous regimens based on azathioprine (AZA), CsA, and Pred. In the general renal transplant patient population, immunosuppressive regimens that include MMF are usually well tolerated. It is not clear whether this holds true for older transplant recipients, who may be more susceptible to complications from the greater immunosuppression conferred by MMF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our geriatric renal transplant population (age >60 years, 1990-1998) and compared a cohort of 46 patients treated with AZA, Pred, and CsA to a cohort of 45 patients treated with MMF, Pred, and CsA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to pretransplantation demographics. Patient and graft survival during the first year was not significantly different between the groups. During the first year of follow-up, we observed 27 infections requiring hospitalization in 15 patients in the MMF-treated group as compared with 10 infections in 7 patients in the AZA-treated group. A Cox proportional hazard model accounting for the above mentioned covariates isolated MMF versus AZA as a significant risk factor for the occurrence of serious infectious events (all: P<0.01; cytomegalovirus, fungal: P<0.01). CONCLUSION: We conclude that an immunosuppressive regimen of MMF, CsA, and Pred seems to be correlated with an increased incidence of infectious adverse events as compared with AZA, CsA, and Pred in elderly patients.     

Renal allograft biopsy and conversion of cyclosporine to azathioprine

A prospective nonrandomized study was conducted to evaluate the results of two conversion protocols on two similar groups of renal graft recipients totaling 54 patients who were converted from CsA to AZA at 6-12 months posttransplant. With protocol I, 24 patients (3 haploidentical, 21 cadaveric recipients) were converted with a graft biopsy followed by a 14-day overlap of CsA and AZA before the CsA dose was tapered and discontinued in 6 days. Of the 24 patients, 8 were found to have occult rejection in biopsy and received methylprednisolone 500 mg boluses for three days before overlap started. Thirty patients (2 haploidentical, 28 cadaveric recipients) were converted with protocol II, which had CsA and AZA overlap and tapering schedules identical to those of protocol I without a preconversion biopsy. Follow-up extended as far as 3 years posttransplant. There was a substantial incidence of chronic rejection and graft loss after conversion in protocol II patients. We also found that there was a possible link between postconversion acute rejection and late graft loss from chronic rejection. The incidence of acute rejection after conversion was significantly lower among protocol I patients as compared with that of protocol II (4% vs. 37%, P less than 0.001). However, if 8 patients with occult rejection in the preconversion biopsy were added to the total number of postconversion rejection in protocol I, the incidence of postconversion rejection in this group (38%) would be similar to that of protocol II. Using the time of conversion as the onset of the risk, protocol I patients had better graft survival than protocol II (100% vs. 80%, P less than 0.005) at 3 years posttransplant. If conversion becomes necessary, we recommend a preconversion graft biopsy to identify and treat patients with occult rejection before the beginning of CsA and AZA overlap, especially for those patients whose creatinine is higher than 2 mg/dl without obvious cause before conversion.     

Analysis of a single-center experience with mycophenolate mofetil based immunosuppression in renal transplantation

Purpose. Acute rejection continues to be a major clinical issue in renal transplantation. Three large multicenter trials have demonstrated a 50% decline in biopsy‐proven rejection when mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given to renal transplant recipients with corticosteroids and cyclosporine. The purpose of this study was to compare the 6‐month outcome of renal transplant recipients using MMF and non‐MMF based immunosuppression protocols over a 4‐year period at a single center.
Methods. This retrospective study analyzed three patient groups defined by their immunosuppression protocol. The first group included patients who received a quadruple immunosuppression regimen of antilymphocyte induction (ATG), cyclosporine (CYA), azathioprine (AZA), and corticosteroids (CCS), and were transplanted between October 1993 and May 1995 (AZA group). The second group included patients who received a triple immunosuppression regimen of CYA, MMF, and CCS, and were transplanted between June 1995 and May 1996 (MMF group). The third group included patients who were transplanted between January 1997 and December 1997, and received an immunosuppression regimen of CYA and MMF with a reduced CCS dosing schema (reduced steroid group (RST)). Data were collected from a retrospective review of inpatient and outpatient clinical records.
Results. A total of 325 patients were included in the study (106 AZA, 106 MMF, 113 RST). The demographic characteristics of the three groups were similar; however, the mean donor age for the AZA group was 40±15.1 years versus 33±14.1 years and 34±13.1 years for the MMF and RST groups, respectively (p<0.043). The incidence of acute, biopsy‐proven rejection at 6 months was significantly less in the MMF group when compared with the AZA group [16 (15.1%) versus 35 (33%) patients, p=0.002]. However, the incidence of acute, biopsy‐proven rejection in the RST group (35 patients, 31%) was similar to that of the AZA group. Kaplan–Meier estimates for the cumulative incidence of acute rejection demonstrated a significant difference between the MMF group and the other two groups (p=0.0059). The AZA group had more severe rejection as demonstrated by the more frequent use of antilymphocyte therapy for rejection treatment (68.4% episodes) compared with the MMF (38.9%) and RST (47.6%) groups. After 6 months of follow‐up, 11 patients had lost their grafts (8, AZA; 1, MMF; 2, RST). One patient died in each of the AZA and RST groups due to hemorrhage and a pulmonary embolus, respectively. Four AZA patients were diagnosed with a malignancy (three post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, one squamous skin cell carcinoma) compared with 2 MMF patients (prostate cancer, basal skin cell carcinoma) and no RST patients. Herpes zoster was the only infection that occurred more frequently in the MMF group (p=0.03). No other differences in infection rates were noted among the three groups. The initial length of hospital stay declined significantly over the 4‐year study period [11±4.3 d (AZA), 7.0±4.0 d (MMF), 6.2±3.3 d (RST), p<0.001]. Total number of hospital days for the first 6 months also followed a similar declining pattern. Despite using intravenous cyclosporine immediately post‐transplant in the MMF and RST groups, the incidence of delayed graft function was similar among the three groups. Average serum creatinine at 1 month was significantly lower in the MMF group (p=0.008), but no difference was noted at 3 and 6 months when compared with the AZA and RST groups.
Conclusion. This retrospective analysis indicates that MMF is an effective immunosuppressant. Decreased length of stay and less steroid resistant rejections with MMF is favorable for decreased hospital costs. However, the rebound in rejection rate with the RST group suggests that further study is needed to define the optimal use of this agent in combination with others to maximize effectiveness and minimize negative side effects.     

Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine a in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study

BACKGROUND: This study determined whether cyclosporine A (CsA)-treated renal allograft recipients with deteriorating renal function ("creeping creatinine") secondary to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) benefit from the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to their immunosuppressive regimen, followed by withdrawal of CsA. METHODS: In a controlled, open, multicenter study, CsA-treated renal allograft recipients with progressively deteriorating renal function were randomized to have their CsA discontinued with the concomitant addition of MMF to their regimen (group A) or to continue treatment with CsA (group B). The primary endpoint was the response rate over the 6-month period after withdrawal of CsA in group A or the equivalent time in group B. Response was defined as a stabilization or reduction of serum creatinine (SCr), as evidenced by a flattening or positive slope of the 1/SCr plot and no graft loss. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of acute rejection, graft and patient survival, and changes in selected metabolic parameters. RESULTS: The response rate in the primary intent-to-treat population (n=122) was 58% (36/62) in group A versus 32% (19/60) in group B (P=0.0060). The corresponding percentages of responders in the per-protocol population (n=107) were 60% (36/60) and 26% (12/47), respectively (P=0.0008). There were no acute rejections in group A during the study period. Patients in this group also experienced a significant decrease in total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with progressively deteriorating renal function secondary to CAN, addition of MMF followed by withdrawal of CsA results in a significant improvement in transplant function without the risk of acute rejection.     

环孢素A转换为他克莫司对慢性移植肾肾病患者的治疗效果

目的 探讨由环孢素A(CsA)转换为他克莫司(Tac)为主的免疫抑制方案对慢性移植肾肾病(CAN)患者的治疗效果.方法 选择接受同种肾移植后发生CAN的患者153例,患者肾移植后均采用CsA、吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)及泼尼松(Pred)的免疫抑制方案.根据是否以Tac替换CsA将患者分为两组.(1)CsA组:45例,进入研究后患者维持原免疫抑制方案.(2)Tac组:108例,进入研究后将CsA转换为Tac,停用CsA后立即开始服用Tac,MMF和Pred的用法同CsA组.对所有患者随访12个月,观察人/移植肾存活率、急性排斥反应发生率、移植肾功能、24 h尿蛋白定量、移植肾穿刺病理学活检及免疫抑制剂的不良反应等指标.结果 随访12个月时,CsA组和Tac组患者存活率均为100%,移植肾存活率分别为86.6%和93.5%(P＜0.05);急性排斥反应发生率分别为4.4%(2/45)和3.7%(4/108)(P＞0.05),6例发生急性排斥反应的患者均经甲泼尼龙冲击治疗3 d后逆转.Tac组患者移植肾功能明显改善,并且出现重度蛋白尿、重度肾间质纤维化和肾小管萎缩的患者比例较CsA组显著减少(P＜0.05).Tac组有13.8%(15例)的患者出现轻度血糖增高,发生率显著高于CsA组的4.4%(2例)(P＜0.05);Tac组有22.2%(24例)的患者发生高血压,发生率显著低于CsA组的55.6%(25例)(P＜0.05);17例因使用CsA而出现牙龈增生和多毛症者,经转换治疗后,症状均明显好转.结论 由CsA转换为Tac为主的免疫抑制方案能够显著改善CAN患者的移植肾功能,延缓CAN的发展,转换过程中未发生严重Tac不良反应并且改善了使用CsA时出现的不良反应.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the effect of conversion from cyclosporine A (CsA) to tacrolimus (Tac) on chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Methods 153 CAN patients undergoing kidney transplantation received CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone (CsA-MMF-Pred) regimen after kidney transplantation, and divided into 2 groups according to whether CsA were maintained in the immunosuppressive regimen: CsA + MMF + Pred group (CsA group, n = 45); Tac + MMF + Pred group (Tac group, n = 108). The patients were followed up with patient/kidney survival rate, acute rejection incidence, renal function, 24-h proteinuria and adverse events of immunosuppressive drugs for 12 months. Results Compared with CsA group, the transplanted kidney survival rate was significantly higher in Tac group (93. 5 % vs 86.6 %, P＜0. 05). Acute rejection (AR) was diagnosed in 4. 4 % (2/45) of recipients in CsA group and 3. 7 % (4/108) in Tac group (P＞0. 05) respectively. Acute rejection (2 cases in CsA group and 4 in Tac group) was reversed by 500 mg of methylprednisolone for consecutive 3 days, and the patients in Tac group showed a significantly lower degree of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) (P＜0. 05).Renal allograft functions and 24-h proteinuria during a follow-up period of 12 months were significantly improved in Tac group (P ＜ 0. 05). Incidence of mild hyperglycemia in Tac Group (13.8 %, 15/108) was significantly higher than in CsA group (4.4 %, 2/45), and that of hypertension in Tac group (22. 2 %, 24/108) was significantly lower than in CsA group (55.6 %,25/45). CsA-related side effects (such as hirsutism and gingival hypertrophy) in 17 patients were greatly improved after conversion from CsA to Tac treatment. Conclusion The conversion from CsA to Tac on the patients with CAN can improve renal allograft function, retard the progression of renal allograft dysfunction, reduce the incidence of CsA-related side effects and not generate serious adverse effects of Tac.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at three years

METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC + azathioprine (AZA), or cyclosporine (Neoral; CsA) + MMF. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function (DGF). Patients were followed-up for 3 years. RESULTS: The results at 3 years corroborate and extend the findings of the 2-year results. Patients with DGF treated with TAC+MMF experienced an increase in 3-year allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (84.1% vs. 49.9%, P=0.02). Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing TAC exhibited numerically superior kidney function when compared with CsA. During the 3 years, new-onset insulin dependence occurred in 6, 3, and 11 patients in the TAC+MMF, CsA+MMF, and TAC+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients randomized to TAC+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF as compared with those who received CsA+MMF. CONCLUSION: All three immunosuppressive regimens provided excellent safety and efficacy. However, the best results overall were achieved with TAC+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients with DGF. In patients who experienced DGF, graft survival was better at 3 years in those patients receiving TAC in combination with either MMF or AZA as compared with the patients receiving CsA with MMF.     

Mycophenolate mofetil, an alternative to cyclosporine A for long-term immunosuppression in kidney transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) is a nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressant most often used in combination with cyclosporine A (CsA) and prednisone (Pred). This study reports the outcome of 17 adult renal recipients whose immunosuppressive regimen was changed from CsA-Pred to MMF-Pred because of CsA nephrotoxicity. METHODS: CsA nephrotoxicity was diagnosed in all patients based on suggestive histopathological lesions on a renal biopsy. Sixteen patients had deteriorating graft function and 1 had isolated persistent proteinuria. Immunosuppressive therapy was changed 57+/-32 months posttransplant. RESULTS: After replacement of CsA by MMF, a reduction in serum creatinine was observed in all patients (mean 26+/-17%). This reduction was maintained 20+/-8 months after the change in therapy without any episodes of acute rejection. Serum lipids and blood pressure also decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MMF-Pred can be an effective long-term immunosuppressive treatment alternative for renal transplant patients experiencing CsA nephrotoxicity. Such treatment may result in improved graft function, and better control of hypertension and hyperlipidemia.     

Long-term graft outcome in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy after immunosuppression modifications

Background/aim  This retrospective study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of immunosuppression conversion on progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Methods  One-hundred and seventy-four cyclosporin (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients were studied. Patients were included if they had a biopsy-proven CAN (mild to moderate) with serum creatinine ≤3.5 mg/dL. Patient treatment was switched to either: (A) MMF/reduced dose CsA (MMF for azathioprine (Aza); n = 132); or (B) Aza/Tac for CsA (n = 42). Patient records were checked for graft function and survival, and for co-morbidities after conversion. Results  Mean follow-up before conversion was 52.2 ± 31.1 and 47.9 ± 27.4 months for groups A and B, respectively. There was significant deterioration of graft function in group B after five years (P < 0.5). Ten-year actuarial graft survival was 38% in group A and 19% in group B (P = 0.04). Nine patients (five patients and four patients in groups A and B, respectively) started dialysis within 12 months. Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower insignificant incidence of hyperlipidemia (P = 0.05), but a significantly higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.04).There was no significant change or difference in blood pressure between groups. Conclusions  Our results suggest that in patients with CAN and deteriorating allograft function, CsA minimization and addition of MMF achieved favorable efficacies in retarding the decline of graft function. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed for validation.     

Effects of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil-immunosuppressive regimens on the erythropoietic system of renal transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION: Azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are major immunosuppressants used to prevent rejection following renal transplantation. Bone marrow suppression is a potential adverse effect of these agents manifesting itself as leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of AZA versus MMF immunosuppressive regimens on the erythropoietic system of renal transplant recipients within 6 months after transplantation. METHODS: Eighty kidney allograft recipients who were on AZA (n = 40) or MMF (n = 40) plus cyclosporine and prednisolone were enrolled in this study. Hematologic parameters included red blood cell counts, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) and were measured before and at 1 week, as well as 1 and 6 months posttransplantation. Plasma erythropoietin level was measured at the end of 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed with Student t test; a P value less than .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding red blood cell counts. High Hb level was noted at 1 and 6 months posttransplantation among patients who received MMF. MCH and MCHC were higher among patients on MMF compared with those on AZA at 1 week and 1 month posttransplant. Although the mean plasma erythropoietin levels in AZA-treated patients were higher than those of MMF-treated patients, the trend did not reach statistical significance (P = .066). CONCLUSION: MMF administration was apparently associated with a higher level of hemoglobin compared with AZA among renal allograft recipients with good graft function at 6 months posttransplantation.     

Safe conversion of mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients with sirolimus-based immunosuppression

Aim:   Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a powerful immunosuppressive drug with established efficacy and safety. The long-term use of MMF may bring increased risk of for infection and malignancy and also increased cost of transplantation. The search for minimization of immunosuppressive protocol has led to an open randomized clinical trial of conversion from MMF to azathioprine (AZA).
Methods:   A total of 50 kidney allograft recipients treated with prednisone, sirolimus and MMF were randomized into two groups: converted (AZA group) and continuing (MMF group). The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 43 months in each group. Inclusion criteria included: patients with serum creatinine levels of less than 200 µmol/L; no past history of acute vascular rejection or recent acute rejection 6 months before randomization; and normal liver function tests.
Results:   Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. During the 12 month observation period, there were no acute rejection episodes in either group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival or function. AZA-treated patients had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal complications ( P  = 0.03). Daily cost reduction in the AZA group was more than $US8.79/day per patient.
Conclusion:   In general, replacing MMF with AZA in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated and was cost effective with no increased risk of rejection. As the this study was on relatively small samples, larger and longer follow-up studies will be needed to confirm these expected advantages for the long-term outcome and to assess the long-term safety of this minimization of immunosuppressive therapy.