Hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: does intervention alter outcomes?

BACKGROUND: In most instances, advanced neuroendocrine tumors follow an indolent course. Hepatic metastases are common, and although they can cause significant pain, incapacitating endocrinopathy, and even death, they are usually asymptomatic. The appropriate timing and efficacy of interventions, such as hepatic artery embolization (HAE) and operation, remain controversial. STUDY DESIGN: The records of 85 selected patients referred for treatment of hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastases between 1992 and 1998 were reviewed from a prospective database. A multidisciplinary group of surgeons, radiologists, and oncologists managed all patients. Overall survival among this cohort is reported and prognostic variables, which may be predictive of survival, are analyzed. RESULTS: There were 37 men and 48 women, with a median age of 52 years. There were 41 carcinoid tumors, 26 nonfunctional islet cell tumors, and 18 functional islet cell tumors. Thirty-eight patients had extrahepatic metastases, and in 84% of patients, the liver metastases were bilobar. Eighteen patients were treated with medical therapy or best supportive care, 33 patients underwent HAE, and 34 patients underwent hepatic resection. Both the HAE-related mortality and the 30-day operative mortality rates were 6%. By univariate analysis, earlier resection of the primary tumor, curative intent of treatment, and initial surgical treatment were associated with prolonged survival (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, only curative intent to treat remained significant (p < 0.04). Patients with bilobar or more than 75% liver involvement by tumor were least likely to benefit from surgical resection. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for the entire group were 83%, 61%, and 53%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals for patients treated with medical therapy, HAE, and operation were 76%, 39%, and not available; 94%, 83%, and 50%; and 94%, 83%, and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors are best managed with a multidisciplinary approach. Both HAE and surgical resection provide excellent palliation of hormonal and pain symptoms. In select patients, surgical resection of hepatic metastases may prolong survival, but is rarely curative.     

Neuroendocrine hepatic metastases: does aggressive management improve survival?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether aggressive management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases improves survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Survival in patients with carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is significantly better than adenocarcinomas arising from the same organs. However, survival and quality of life are diminished in patients with neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. In recent years, aggressive treatment of hepatic neuroendocrine tumors has been shown to relieve symptoms. Minimal data are available, however, to document improved survival with this approach. METHODS: The records of patients with carcinoid (n = 84) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (n = 69) managed at our institution from January 1990 through July 2004 were reviewed. Eighty-four patients had malignant tumors, and hepatic metastases were present in 60 of these patients. Of these 60 patients, 23 received no aggressive treatment of their liver metastases, 19 were treated with hepatic resection and/or ablation, and 18 were managed with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) frequently (n = 11) in addition to resection and/or ablation. These groups did not differ with respect to age, gender, tumor type, or extent of liver involvement. RESULTS: Median and 5-year survival were 20 months and 25% for the Nonaggressive group, >96 months and 72% for the Resection/Ablation group, and 50 months and 50% for the TACE group. The survival for the Resection/Ablation and the TACE groups was significantly better (P < 0.05) when compared with the Nonaggressive group. Patients with more than 50% liver involvement had a poor outcome (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that aggressive management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases does improve survival, that chemoembolization increases the patient population eligible for this strategy, and that patients with more than 50% liver involvement may not benefit from an aggressive approach.     

Treatment of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Background: Hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors demand differentiated therapeutic management due to the unique natural course and hormone secretion of the tumors. Aim: The purpose of the prospective nonrandomized study was to review the institutional experience with surgical treatment of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases. Patients and methods: From September 1992 until March 1996 29 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumors have been evaluated for surgical treatment of liver metastases. Of them, 11 (37.9%) fulfilled criteria for surgical treatment of hepatic secondary tumors. Extensive preoperative workup was carried out. Patients were divided in groups for curative or palliative resection. Liver transplantation was carried out in selected patients with disseminated liver metastases. Results: Of 29 patients 4 (13.7%) underwent curative resection and in 3 patients (10.3%) palliative resection was performed. The patients who underwent curative resection are all biochemically and clinically tumor free at a mean postoperative follow-up of 22.3 months. Two patients who underwent palliative resection are alive at 40 and 29 months, respectively. From 12 patients evaluated for liver transplantation 4 were considered as suitable candidates. Conclusions: Liver resection can be recommended in patients with hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors in terms of potential survival prolongation and palliation. Liver transplantation is generally acceptable treatment in highly selected group of these patients. Long-term results have to be awaited before definitive proof of the beneficial effect of surgical treatment. Received: 14 November 1997     

Indications and results of liver resection and hepatic chemoembolization for metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND: We reviewed 36 patients with liver metastases from islet cell tumors of the pancreas (n = 18) and carcinoid tumors (n = 18) who were treated with surgical resection (n = 16) or hepatic chemoembolization (n = 20). METHODS: All resections were complete and included 4 lobectomies, 6 segmental resections, and 6 wedge resections. There were no operative deaths. RESULTS: Median survival has not yet been reached, and the actuarial 5-year survival rate is 70%. Prognostic variables associated with improved disease-free survival included prior resection of the primary tumor and 4 or fewer metastases resected (P <.05). With an average of 3 chemoembolization procedures per patient, 17 of 20 patients (90%) demonstrated either a significant radiographic response (n = 5), stabilization of tumor mass (n = 2), or improvement of clinical symptoms (n = 10). Factors related to a sustained response (more then 1 year) included surgical resection of the primary tumor, 4 or more chemoembolization procedures, and liver metastases of 5 cm or smaller. Median survival after treatment was 32 months (range, 7-63 months), and the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors provides the best chance for extended survival. Chemoembolization effectively improves clinical symptoms and, in selected patients, may provide sustained tumor control.     

Cryoablation and liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: Liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases has merit for selected primary tumor types. The role of cryosurgical tumor ablation within this cohort of patients has not been evaluated. This is a single institutional review of treatment outcomes using cryosurgical ablation and conventional resection techniques for noncolorectal liver metastases. METHODS: The medical records of 42 patients undergoing 48 hepatic tumor ablative procedures from February 1991 through May 2001 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival and local hepatic tumor recurrence-free survival were analyzed for different surgical procedures and primary tumor types. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years are 82%, 55%, and 39%, respectively (median survival, 45 months). Local hepatic tumor recurrence-free survival rates for resection only (n = 25) and cryosurgery with or without resection (n = 23), at 3 years are 24% and 19%, respectively. The survival rates at 5 years are 40% and 37%, for resection only and cryosurgery with or without resection, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cryosurgical hepatic tumor ablation for metastatic noncolorectal primary tumors results in survival and local hepatic tumor recurrence rates similar to resection alone. The combination of cryosurgery and resection extends the cohort of patients with surgically treatable disease.     

Surgical therapy for recurrent liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Forty percent of patients whose disease recurs after hepatic resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer initially will have liver-only metastases. We have retrospectively reviewed our experience with repeated surgical treatment for liver-only recurrence after previous hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Repeated hepatic procedures were performed with no mortality in 10 patients. Intraoperative ultrasound allowed identification of three unsuspected metastases and determination of unresectability of two metastases during 11 procedures. Three patients were free of disease at 31, 41, and 48 months from the first hepatic procedure and at 15, 31, and 43 months from the second procedure. Five patients have remained free of hepatic disease. Patients whose initial metastases were less than 6 cm in diameter and had single liver recurrences after hepatic resection appeared to be the best candidates for further surgical therapy. These data and a review of the literature suggest that surgical treatment of recurrent liver metastases from colorectal cancer can be performed safely, and it is associated with long-term disease-free survival in up to 38% of highly selected patients.     

Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVE: To examine recurrence and survival rates for patients treated with hepatic resection only, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) plus resection or RFA only for colorectal liver metastases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Thermal destruction techniques, particularly RFA, have been rapidly accepted into surgical practice in the last 5 years. Long-term survival data following treatment of colorectal liver metastasis using RFA with or without hepatic resection are lacking. METHODS: Data from 358 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases treated for cure with hepatic resection +/- RFA and 70 patients found at laparotomy to have liver-only disease but not to be candidates for potentially curative treatment were compared (1992-2002). RESULTS: Of 418 patients treated, 190 (45%) underwent resection only, 101 RFA + resection (24%), 57 RFA only (14%), and 70 laparotomy with biopsy only or arterial infusion pump placement ("chemotherapy only," 17%). RFA was used in operative candidates who could not undergo complete resection of disease. Overall recurrence was most common after RFA (84% vs. 64% RFA + resection vs. 52% resection only, P < 0.001). Liver-only recurrence after RFA was fourfold the rate after resection (44% vs. 11% of patients, P < 0.001), and true local recurrence was most common after RFA (9% of patients vs. 5% RFA + resection vs. 2% resection only, P = 0.02). Overall survival rate was highest after resection (58% at 5 years); 4-year survival after resection, RFA + resection and RFA only were 65%, 36%, and 22%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Survival for "unresectable" patients treated with RFA + resection or RFA only was greater than chemotherapy only (P = 0.0017). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases. RFA alone or in combination with resection for unresectable patients does not provide survival comparable to resection, and provides survival only slightly superior to nonsurgical treatment.     

Radiofrequency ablation treatment of refractory carcinoid hepatic metastases

BACKGROUND: Our institution has experienced excellent success using hepatic artery embolization for treating symptoms and slowing tumor progression for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases for carcinoid tumors. Our previous treatment strategies used hepatic artery embolization alone, examining control of symptoms and dependence on octreotide therapy. However, some patients exhibit hepatic metastases that are unresponsive to embolization. This report describes the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as salvage treatment for these refractory metastases. METHODS: Thirteen patients with unresectable bilobar hepatic metastases from biochemically confirmed carcinoid tumors were treated with selective hepatic artery embolization using Lipiodol/Gelfoam between 1994 and 2000. Three patients developed symptoms resistant to embolization treatment resulting from progression of existing metastases or development of new metastases. These patients underwent surgical exploration and intraoperative ultrasound of their refractory lesions, followed by treatment with RFA. Tumor size, symptoms of carcinoid syndrome, and octreotide requirements were monitored postoperatively. RESULTS: Median follow-up for the three patients treated with RFA was 6 months. During the first 3-month interval following RFA, all three patients demonstrated decrease in the size of treated lesions. Using our previously developed symptom scoring system, all three patients demonstrated decreased symptoms following treatment. One patient was able to discontinue octreotide treatment, and the other two patients required decrease octreotide dosages. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that utilization of RFA treatment for carcinoid metastases refractory to hepatic artery embolization may represent a useful adjunct for symptomatic control, decreased octreotide dependence, and slowing of disease progression.     

Liver surgery: what is feasible?

BACKGROUND: Bilobar hepatic metastases, a small residual liver volume, de-novo and recurrent lesions, simultaneous pulmonary metastases and infiltration of vascular structures are often limiting factors in the surgical treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors. Nevertheless surgery is the "gold standard" with the chance of long-term survival, not possible to achieve with locally ablation and chemotherapy. METHODS: The combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiofrequency ablation, extended liver resection after selective portal vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy, resection and reconstruction of vascular structures in deep hypothermia and simultaneous resection of pulmonary metastases, increase the resectability even in patients with poor prognosis achieving 5-year-survival rates between 26-46 % in colorectal liver metastases, 40 % in primary liver tumors and a median survival of 42 months after resection of liver and lung metastases. CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary treatment and aggressive surgical resection seem to be justified, when performed safely as a curative option.     

The presence of colorectal hepatic metastases does not preclude pulmonary metastasectomy

Hepatic metastases due to colorectal carcinoma have often been felt to preclude pulmonary metastasectomy. With the recent advances in surgical options, should patients with both liver and lung metastases be considered for surgical resection? The current study reviews the impact of such aggressive management on disease-free and overall survival (OS). The clinical course of 63 patients presenting with colorectal metastasis to the lung alone (group 1, n = 45) or combined hepatic and lung metastases (group 2, n = 18) were reviewed. All patients underwent complete resection of their lung metastases. Surgical control of hepatic tumor burden was achieved by tumor ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and/or resection. All patients in group 1 and group 2 were available for a mean follow-up of 27 and 24 months, respectively. The presence of hepatic metastases, the resectability of hepatic tumor burden, and the disease-free interval after pulmonary metastasectomy did not significantly influence survival. These findings demonstrate that aggressive surgical management of pulmonary metastases in the presence of liver metastases offers a similar benefit as compared to patients with pulmonary metastases alone. Therefore, hepatic metastatic disease does not preclude an attempt at pulmonary metastasectomy if hepatic metastases can be resected or remains responsive to therapy. Such an approach achieves comparable OS and mean survival when compared to pulmonary metastasectomy alone.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma: multimodality management

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common tumors worldwide. Surgical resection has been the standard treatment but can only be applied to a small percentage of patients. In recent years, several other treatment options, including ablative procedures and transplantation, have been used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: For 6 years, 110 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were managed at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Fifty-five patients received only chemotherapy (n = 5) or palliative treatment (n = 50) because of advanced cirrhosis (P <.03) or tumor. Thirty-one patients had tumor ablation with percutaneous ethanol injection, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or arterial chemoembolization. Twenty-eight patients underwent surgical resection (n = 18) or hepatic transplantation (n = 10). Relatively more patients (38%; P <.001) were treated with ablation in the second period of the study (1998-2000). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 3% with ablation and 0% with resection. Median survival was 6 months with no treatment, 27 months with ablation (P <.001), and 35 months with resection (P <.001). Patients who underwent liver transplantation had the longest median survival (53 months). A multivariate analysis suggested that treatment modality (ablation or resection; P <.001) and Child-Pugh classification (P <.01) were the most important factors predicting outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma requires multidisciplinary expertise and that ablation and operation can be performed safely. Outcome is influenced most by treatment modality and Child-Pugh classification. Patients in Child-Pugh classes A and B should be treated with ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation.     

Hepatic Metastases of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Safe Hepatic Surgery

Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors are usually slow-growing, and cytoreductive hepatectomy can help reduce the effects of endocrinopathies and increase life expectancy and symptom-free survival. However, it has yet to be fully investigated how hepatectomy for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors can be performed safely. Here we report the results of 13 patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases operated on in our institution and those of a French multicentric study that included 131 patients. Preoperative patient selection and appropriate surgical technique, sometimes combined with preoperative portal embolization and local tumor destruction (radiofrequency and cryotherapy), may increase the resectability and the safety of the procedure. The mortality rate after hepatectomy was 0% (2.3% in the French study); the 3- and 6-year survival rates were 91% and 68%, respectively, in our institution (the mean survival time was 66 months in the French multicentric survey). Significant prolonged survival with complete palliation of symptoms can be obtained after liver metastases resection with low mortality.     

Hepatic cytoreduction followed by a novel long-acting somatostatin analog: a paradigm for intractable neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of symptomatic neuroendocrine tumors that metastasize to the liver is controversial. We investigated aggressive hepatic cytoreduction and postoperative administration of octreotide long-acting release (LAR), a long-acting somatostatin analog. METHODS: Between December 1992 and August 2000, 31 patients underwent hepatic surgical cytoreduction (20 carcinoid, 10 islet cell, and 1 medullary). All patients had progressive symptoms refractory to conventional therapy. RESULTS: Hepatic cytoreduction (resection, cryosurgery, and/or radiofrequency ablation) eliminated symptoms in 27 patients (87%) and decreased secretion of hormones by an overall mean of 59%. When minor symptoms returned and/or hormonal levels increased during follow-up, adjuvant therapy was started. Ten patients received adjuvant octreotide LAR once a month, and 21 received other adjuvants. At a median postoperative follow-up of 26 months, 16 patients had progressive/recurrent disease, 13 had died of their disease, and 2 remained free of disease. Median symptom-free interval was 60 months (95% confidence interval, 48-72) with octreotide LAR and 16 months (95% confidence interval, 10-29) with other adjuvants (P = .0007). Two-year symptom-free survival rate was 100% with octreotide LAR and 33% with other adjuvants. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic surgical cytoreduction can palliate progressive symptoms associated with liver metastases from intractable neuroendocrine tumors. Postoperative adjuvant therapy with octreotide LAR can prolong symptom-free survival.     

Combined Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation for Advanced Hepatic Malignancies: Results in 172 Patients

Background: Resection combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a novel approach in patients who are otherwise unresectable. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of hepatic resection combined with RFA.Methods: Patients with multifocal hepatic malignancies were treated with surgical resection combined with RFA. All patients were followed prospectively to assess complications, treatment response, and recurrence.Results: Seven hundred thirty seven tumors in 172 patients were treated (124 with colorectal metastases; 48 with noncolorectal metastases). RFA was used to treat 350 tumors. Combined modality treatment was well tolerated with low operative times and minimal blood loss. The postoperative complication rate was 19.8% with a mortality rate of 2.3%. At a median follow-up of 21.3 months, tumors had recurred in 98 patients (56.9%). Failure at the RFA site was uncommon (2.3%). A combined total number of tumors treated with resection and RFA >10 was associated with a faster time to recurrence (P = .02). The median actuarial survival time was 45.5 months. Patients with noncolorectal metastases and those with less operative blood loss had an improved survival (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively), whereas radiofrequency ablating a lesion >3 cm adversely impacted survival (HR = 1.85, P = .04).Conclusions: Resection combined with RFA provides a surgical option to a group of patients with liver metastases who traditionally are unresectable, and may increase long-term survival.     

Radiofrequency ablation: a novel primary and adjunctive ablative technique for hepatic malignancies.

The majority of primary and metastatic tumors of the liver are not amenable to surgical resection at presentation. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a new modality for local tumor destruction with minimal local and systemic complications. We prospectively reviewed the experience with RFA at a single institute as a primary or adjunctive ablative technique in the treatment of hepatic malignancies. Between November 1997 and December 1998, 30 patients with primary or metastatic hepatic lesions were treated with RFA at the John Wayne Cancer Institute and the Cancer Center at Century City Hospital. Pathology of the treated lesions included colorectal metastases (29 in 14 patients), neuroendocrine metastases (29 in 4 patients), noncolorectal metastases (29 in 9 patients), and hepatocellular carcinoma (6 in 3 patients). Twelve patients underwent RFA laparoscopically, 12 at celiotomy, and the remaining 6 patients had percutaneous ablation. RFA was the only procedure in 17 patients, whereas the remainder underwent a combination of RFA and other procedures including resection, cryosurgical ablation, and hepatic artery infusion pump placement. Median length of stay for all patients was 6 days (2 days for laparoscopic patients). A single complication of a delayed intrahepatic abscess was noted in this series (3%). There have been no deaths associated with RFA. At a median follow-up of 5 months, 16 patients remain disease free, and 10 are alive with disease. RFA is a safe and effective method of tumor ablation for hepatic malignancies. This technique can be performed laparoscopically, at celiotomy, or percutaneously and can be used as a primary technique or in conjunction with other interventional procedures.     

Long-term Survival of Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases treated by Percutaneous Interstitial Laser Thermotherapy

In situ ablation of colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases is an accepted form of treatment for selected patients. It is associated with low morbidity and mortality and increases the number of patients who may benefit from therapy compared to resection alone. This study assesses the impact of interstitial laser thermotherapy (ILT) on local tumor control and long-term survival in patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases. Percutaneous ILT was performed in patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases between January 1992 and December 1999 using a bare-tip quartz fiber connected to an Nd:YAG laser source. This was prior to the routine use of a diffusing fiber for ablative therapy. Treatment was monitored with real-time ultrasonography. Tumors were considered unresectable based on their anatomic location or the extent of liver involvement. Patients with extrahepatic disease, more than five liver metastases, or tumors larger than 10 cm in diameter were excluded from this study. Local tumor control was assessed by dynamic computed tomography (CT) 6 months after therapy. Long-term follow-up was undertaken, and the impact of various factors on survival was analyzed. Eighty patients with a mean age of 63.8 years were suitable for ILT. In total, 168 liver tumors with a median diameter of 5 cm (range 1–10 cm) were so treated. There were no procedure-related deaths. The overall complication rate was 16%, with all cases managed conservatively. Bradycardia (n = 5), pneumothorax (n = 3), and persistent pyrexia (n = 3) were the most common complications. Complete tumor ablation was noted in 67% of patients assessed by CT 6 months following the initial therapy. Median follow-up was 35 months (range 4–96 months), with 10 patients alive at the end of this period. Altogether there were 67 deaths, which were related to hepatic disease in 55 cases and to extrahepatic disease in 9; they were unrelated to malignancy in 3 others. Three patients were excluded from follow-up after ILT down-staging of tumors that allowed complete surgical resection. The median disease-free survival of patients treated by ILT was 24.6 months, with a 5-year survival of 3.8%. Poor tumor differentiation and the presence of more than two hepatic metastases were associated with lower overall survival (p < 0.01). Fourteen patients treated by ILT for postoperative hepatic recurrences had the best outcome, with a median overall survival of 36.3 months and a 5-year survival of 17.2%. Percutaneous ILT is a minimally invasive, safe, effective technique that appears to improve overall survival in specific patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases, compared to the natural history of untreated disease reported in the literature.     

Laparoscopic in situ ablation of liver cancer with cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND: In situ ablation has potential for the treatment of patients with liver cancer either as a single-modality treatment or in combination with liver resection. METHODS: Laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasonography was used to target cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation. Thirty-eight patients with 146 liver lesions were treated between January 1995 and December 2000 using cryotherapy alone (nine patients), combined cryotherapy and radiofrequency (eight), radiofrequency alone (15) and in situ ablation with liver resection (six). Cancers treated were metastases from colorectal tumours (n = 25), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5), and neuro endocrine (n = 5), melanoma (n = 2) and renal cell (n = 1) metastases. Complications and survival after in situ ablation were compared with age- and disease-matched controls treated with systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.6 years. At mean follow-up of 26.6 (range 3-62, median 26) months, 22 patients were alive. Survival was increased following in situ ablation compared with that in controls (P < 0.001). Local recurrence at the ablation site was noted in 12 of 44 lesions following cryotherapy and in 20 of 102 lesions after radiofrequency ablation, and new disease in the liver was found in six of 17 and six of 29 patients respectively. The complication rate was higher with cryotherapy than with radiofrequency ablation (four of 17 versus one of 29). Intraoperative ultrasonography identified 14 new hepatic lesions (10 per cent) not seen on preoperative imaging. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic in situ ablation should include ultrasonography to stage the disease. In situ ablation appears to have a survival benefit and should be considered for the treatment of liver cancer in appropriate patients.     

Rationale for the combination of cryoablation with surgical resection of hepatic tumors

Only 5% to 10% of metastatic and primary liver tumors are amenable to surgical resection. Hepatic cryoablation has increased the number of patients who are suitable for curative treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival and intrahepatic recurrence in patients treated with cryoablation and resection. From June 1994 to July 1999, thirty-eight surgically unresectable patients underwent a total of 42 cryoablative procedures for 65 malignant hepatic lesions. Twenty patients underwent cryoablation alone, and 18 patients were treated with a combination of resection and cryoablation, with a minimum of 18 months’ follow-up. The 38 patients had the following malignancies: primary hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 8) and metastases from colorectal cancer (n = 21), neuroendocrine tumors (n = 3), ovarian cancer (n = 3), leiomyosarcoma (n = 1), testicular cancer (n = 1), and endometrial cancer (n = 1). Patients were evaluated preoperatively with spiral CT scans and intraoperatively with ultrasound examinations for lesion location and cryoprobe guidance. Local recurrence was detected by CT. Major complications included bleeding in three patients and acute renal failure, transient liver insufficiency, and postoperative pneumonia in one patient each. Two patients (5%) died during the early postoperative interval; mean hospital stay was 7.1 days. Median follow-up was 28 months (range 18 to 51 months). Overall survival according to Kaplan-Meier analysis was 82%, 65%, and 54% at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Forty-eight-month survival was not significantly different between those patients undergoing cryoablation alone (64%) and those treated with a combination of resection and cryoablation (42 %). Diseasefree survival at 45 months was 36% for patients undergoing cryoablation plus resection compared to 25% for those undergoing cryoablation alone. Local recurrences were detected at five cryosurgical sites, for a rate of 12% overall (5 of 42), 11% (2 of 18) for patients in the cryoablation plus resection group, and 12% (3 of 24) for those in the cryoablation alone group. For patients with colorectal metastases, survival was 70% at 30 months compared to 33% for hepatocellular cancer and 66% for other types of tumors. Patients with tumors larger than 5 cm or numbering more than three did not have significantly decreased survival. Cryoablation of hepatic tumors is a safe and effective treatment for some patients not amenable to resection. The combination of cryoablation and resection results in survival comparable to that achieved with cryoablation alone. Presented at the Forty-First Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, San Diego, Calif., May 21–24, 2000.     

Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Tumors From Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical results and clinicopathologic features of hepatic metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma to identify patients with a better probability of survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Many studies have reported the benefit of hepatic resection for metastatic tumors from colorectal cancer. However, indications for a surgical approach for gastric adenocarcinoma involving the liver have not been clearly defined. METHODS: Ninety (11%) of 807 patients with primary gastric cancer were diagnosed with synchronous (n = 78) or metachronous (n = 12) hepatic metastases. Of these, 19 underwent 20 resections intended to cure the metastatic lesion in the liver. The clinicopathologic features of the hepatic metastases in, and the surgical results for, the 19 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The actuarial 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates after hepatic resection were, respectively, 77%, 34%, and 34%, and three patients survived for more than 5 years after surgery. Solitary and metachronous metastases were significant determinants for a favorable prognosis after hepatic resection. Pathologically, a fibrous pseudocapsule between the tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma was found in 13 of the 19 patients (68%). The presence of a peritumoral fibrous pseudocapsule and a well-differentiated histologic type of metastatic nodule were significant prognostic factors. Factors associated with the primary lesion were not significant prognostic determinants in patients who underwent curative resection of the primary cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Solitary and metachronous metastases from gastric cancer should be treated by a surgical approach and confer a better prognosis. A new prognostic factor, the presence of a pseudocapsule, may be helpful in defining indications for postoperative adjuvant treatment.     

Interstitial ablative techniques for hepatic tumours

BACKGROUND: Most patients with liver tumours are not suitable for surgery but interstitial ablative techniques may control disease progression and improve survival rates. METHODS: A review was undertaken using Medline of all reported studies of cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, interstitial laser photocoagulation, high-intensity focused ultrasound and ethanol ablation of primary liver tumours and hepatic metastases. RESULTS: Although there are no randomized clinical trials, cryoablation, thermal ablation and ethanol ablation have all been shown to be associated with improved palliation in patients with primary and secondary liver cancer. The techniques can be undertaken safely with minimal morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: Although surgical resection remains the first line of treatment for selected patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies, interstitial ablative techniques are promising therapies for patients not suitable for hepatic resection or as an adjunct to liver surgery.