Comparative Effectiveness of Pacing Techniques for Termination of Well-Tolerated Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardias can be terminated by a variety of pacemaker techniques, including rapid and slow stimulation. Fast tachycardias are typically poorly tolerated, and require prompt intervention, usually with rapid pacing. Termination of ventricular tachycardia by slow or single capture pacemaker stimulation techniques is attractive, because of its presumed safety and the possibility of using simple implantable pacers. To identify factors favoring termination, single capture stimulation was used in 390 episodes of ventricular tachycardia in 21 patients, 16 with coronary artery disease, able to tolerate ventricular tachycardia forseveral minutes. Single capture stimulation terminated 223 episodes (57%) in 18 patients, and two were accelerated. Of 157 episodes exposed to 2–3 programmed extrastimuli or rapid pacing 149 (94%) were terminated and 7 were accelerated. Direct current cardioversion was needed in 12 episodes. Without medications, only two patients tolerated VT. Only one patient had reliable termination with single capture stimulation over several days. Systolic blood pressure was similar in episodes terminated and not terminated by single capture stimulation, but the ventricular rate was significantly lower in episodes terminated, 116 ± 19 vs. 133 ±24 (p<0.001). Termination of ventricular tachycardia was not affected by QRS morphology. Single capture termination of ventricular tachycardia is largely unpredictable, with limited reproducibility over a period of time. Although comparatively safe, single capture techniques are not likely toprove useful in the long-term treatment of many patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.     

The Importance of Antitachycardia Pacing for Patients Presenting with Ventricular Tachycardia

The initial experience from electrophysiological studies showed that pacing induced termination of ventricular tachycardias is usually possible but requires a critical pacing sequence. Studies on the resetting phenomenon showed, in most instances of failure of termination, that the "limiting factor" to produce ventricular tachycardia termination is usually failure to produce block within the circuit rather than failure to access or interact with the ventricular tachycardia origin. The resetting response is related to tachycardia termination in a number of ways. Of note is that a steeply increasing resetting pattern usually predicts tachycardia termination. Between 50% and 90% of induced ventricular tachycardias will be terminated by trains of rapid ventricular pacing. The analysis of the pacing rate necessary for termination shows that it varies widely. Paced cycle lengths of < 80% of tachycardia cycle length are necessary in at least 20% of tachycardias. In contrast, the incidence of acceleration is closely related to the paced cycle length: it is negligible with paced cycle lengths over 80% of tachycardia cycle length and increases to 36% with paced cycle lengths below 76% of tachycardia cycle length. Present information about efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in spontaneous tachycardias suggests that it is extremely effective, with over 90% success. However, it is likely that these data correspond to a selected group of tachycardias.     

Pacing for Ventricular Tachycardia

Plusieurs problèmes restent à résoudre avant que les stimulateurs puissent jouer un rôle majeur dans le traitement de la tachycardie ventriculaire. Nous citons des exemples pour illustrer quelques difficultés à résoudre. les mécanismes qui contribuent au succès ou à l'échec de la stimulation antitachycardie sont discutés. L'avenir de cette stimulation sera plus assuré dès que ces appareils serent équipés d'un cardioverteur-défibrillateur de secours.     

Bedside Termination of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia by Transesophageal Atrial Pacing

Transesophageal atrial pacing was used to terminate hemodynamically stable sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in two patients. The procedure was performed at the bedside, no anesthesia was required, there were no complications, and one of the patients went home after the procedure was performed. This method should be considered prior to using direct current cardioversion in patients with hemodynamically stable sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.     

Permanent Antitachycardia Pacemaker Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

This article describes our experience with an antitachycardia pacemaker alone (N = 3) or in combination with an automatic implontoble cardioverter defibrillator (AICD, N = 8) in the treatment of ventricular tochycardia. EJeven patients (mean ejection fraction 31%, mean oge 67 years) received an antitachycardia pacemaker. Nine had their units programmed for automatic antitachycardia pacing, one unit was programmed to automatic antitachycardia pacing by magnet activation only, and one to tachycardia detection and bradycardia support. Of the nine patients with automatic antitachycardia pacing, seven received appropriate and successful pace termination of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia at up to 120 times per month. Eight of these nine have had AICD implantations as well. There were no operative complications. Over a mean (± SD) follow-up of 12.1 ± 9.3 months (range 3–29 months), there have been two deaths, both due to heart failure. There have been four AICD discharges in three patients. Two units discharged in a clinically appropriate setting. The other two units, both with rate cutoffs <200 beats/min, were inadvertently triggered by the antitachycardia pacemaker and/or the underlying rate. In addition to the careful selection of the defibrillator rate cutoff, adverse device-device interactions were avoided by careful intraoperative lead positioning, and the disabling of bradycardia pacing when not needed or contraindicated. Antitachycardia pacing, with the safety provided by the AICD, is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractory ventricular tachycardia.     

The Clinical Use of External Noninvasive Pacing in the Termination of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

In order to evaluate the potential use of external cardiac pacing (EXP) in the clinical termination of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), we attempted VT terminations in seven patients. All had recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (mean rate 145 beats/min), which had previously required cardioversion. During subsequent VT episodes, all seven underwent overdrive pacing with EXP at a pulse amplitude of 120 mA, and rates of 200 pulses/min. A total of 18 of 18 episodes of VT were successfully terminated by EXP alone. In one patient, the first attempt at EXP termination of one episode of VT resulted in an acceleration of the tachycardia, which was then terminated by EXP. All patients tolerated EXP well with minimal sedation. We conclude that EXP may be an effective clinical modality for the termination of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.     

Long-Term Antitachycardia Pacing Experience for Supraventricular Tachycardia

A pacemaker was used to control drug-resistant reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 40 patients. An antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 37 for SVT; in one for ventricular tachycardia that could also be used to terminate SVT; in one SVT could be terminated with an activity rate variable pacemaker; and in one a DDD pacemaker was used for prevention and termination of SVT. Twenty patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, eight had tachycardias due to a concealed accessory pathway, eight had a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, three had reentrant atrial tachycardias, and one had atrial flutter. Twenty-two patients were paced from the right atrium, five from the coronary sinus, ten from the right ventricle, and three had a DDD pacemaker. During a total follow-up period of 1,503 (mean 38) months an estimated 16,240 episodes of tachycardia were terminated promptly at home, 58 required several attempts, 57 episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes but did not require medical attention, and 11 required hospital admission. Hospital admission for SVT decreased from one per patient-month (in the 3 months before implantation) to 1 per 137 patient-months after implantation. Additional reentrant tachycardias occurred in 13 patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with a conservative antitachycardia pacing mode was required in four patients paced from the atrium to avoid pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was used in 42% of patients to help control SVT. Conclusions: (1) Drug-resistant SVTs can be safely and effectively managed on the long-term with antitachycardia pacemakers. (2) Rapid termination of SVT improved the quality-of-life significantly by avoiding prolonged episodes of tachycardia and repetitive hospital admissions.     

Termination Of Sustained Tachycardia By External Noninvasive Pacing

Invasive cardiac pacing has proved useful in the induction and termination of reentrant sustained tachycardias. In one of our two cases, programmed ventricular extra-stimulation was used to induce sustained ventricular tachycardia from the endocardial surface of the right ventricle. Induced ventricular tachycardia was terminated by burst ventricular pacing with an external cardiac pacemaker. In our second patient, external pacing was effective at inducing and terminating sustained supraventricular tachycardia. These patients illustrate that the principles of terminating sustained reentrant tachycardia with invasive pacing may also apply to noninvasive external pacing. The usefulness of this approach in treating reentrant tachycardias needs further evaluation.     

''Long-Term Results of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia

Between 1979 and 1984 the Cybertach-60, (Intermedics, Inc. Model 262-01), a programmable, automatic antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients who had drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The patients have been followed for a total of 64-108 (mean 84 months). All patients were symptomatic and had failed two or more drugs and six patients had required prior DC cardioversion. The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia was atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry in six patients, AV reentry in four patients, and atrial tachycardia in one patient. Preoperatively all patients had reliable termination of the tachycardia without induction of atrial fibrillation by pacing methods available to Cybertach-60. Postimplant, Cybertach-60 reliably terminated all episodes of tachycardia without ancillary drug therapy. Nevertheless, at long-term follow-up antitachycardia pacing was effective and safe in the minority (36%), with only four patients out of eleven still using a pacemaker for supraventricular tachycardia. One of these four patients required additional drug therapy. In one of the patients, the Cybertach-60 was replaced after 78 months by a more advanced device, (Intertach, Intermedics, Inc.) because of a depleted Cybertach-60 battery. In seven patients who no longer use antitachycardia pacing for termination of tachycardia, one patient developed atrial fibrillation during tachycardia termination (at 58 months postimplant). Three patients experienced induction of tachycardia or atrial fibrillation by the pacemaker due to undersensing of sinus P waves (at 36, 48, and 51 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Basal Exit Site of Clinical Ventricular Tachycardia is an Independent Predictor of Antitachycardia Pacing Failure in Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators Recipients

Background: Little is known about predictors of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients. Distance between the stimulation site and the ventricular tachycardia (VT) site of origin may critically affect ATP effectiveness. We hypothesized that ATP may be less effective in ICD patients who had basal VT than in those who had apical VT. Methods: We reviewed data from 52 patients with sustained monomorphic VT and left ventricular disease referred for ICD implantation. ATP was delivered exclusively at the right ventricular apex. The clinical VTs site of origin (basal, midventricular, or apical) was determined in each patient, using 12‐lead electrocardiogram. VTs episodes treated with ATP during the 1‐year follow‐up were studied. ATP success rate (%), defined as the ratio between the number of successful ATP sequences and the number of delivered ATP sequences, was determined in each patient. Results: VT exit site was apical in 19 patients (36%), basal in 18 patients (35%), and midventricular in 15 patients (29%). In those 52 patients, 1,393 ATP sequences, delivered to treat 761 VT episodes, were analyzed. ATP success rate was found to be associated with the VT site of origin (median [interquartile range]): basal (33%[11–67]), midventricular (50%[37–100]), apical (100%[41–100]) (P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis identified basal VT site of origin as an independent predictor of ATP failure (P = 0.023). Conclusion: ATP is less effective in ICD patients who had basal VT than in those who had apical VT before ICD implantation. (PACE 2012; 35:1209–1216)     

The Impact of Antitachycardia Pacing with Defibrillation

Chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be reproducibly terminated by programmed endocardiaJ right ventricular stimulation. However, antitachycardia pacing can be associated with possible acceleration of VT, while frequent episodes of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The combined use of antitachycardia pacing and the AICD (automatic implantable cardioverier defibrillator) was evaluated in 6 out of 51 patients (age 57 ± 11 years) in whom the AICD had been implanted because of recurrent VT. In each instance VT could be terminated by temporary overdrive pacing. The interactive mode of VT termination by a pacemaker (Tachylog) as well as by the AICD was assessed after implantation. In the automatic mode, the Tachylog functioned as a bipolar, ventricular inhibited (VVI) device with antitachycardia burst stimulation capability, allowing two to five stimuli at intervals of 260–300 ms and one or two interventions. During follow-up of 47 ± 24 months, the Tachylog terminated VT reliably 50–505 times per patient. When burst stimulation accelerated VT, termination was achieved by AICD discharge. Thus, drug resistant VT can be terminated by antitachycardia pacing to avoid patient discomfort. In the event of tachycardia acceleration, VT was terminated by the AICD. A universal pacemaker-defibrillafor should combine antibradycardia and antitachycardia pacing with back-up cardioversion defibrillation.     

Long-Term Therapy of Antitachycardia Pacing for Supraventricular Tachycardia

Long-term antitachycardia pacing therapy with the InterTach 262-12 and 262-16 was evaluated in 32 consecutive patients (mean age 50 +/- 13 years) with recurrent, drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 20 patients, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in ten patients, and a reentrant tachycardia due to Mahaim fibers in one patient. During follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months, 250 persistent tachycardia episodes occurred in 22 patients. By adjusting detection and termination mode, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia could be controlled in 19 of 32 patients (60%) by antitachycardia pacing alone. Concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy was required in ten of 32 patients (30%). During follow-up antitachycardia pacing became ineffective in three patients (10%). Thus, chronic antitachycardia pacing proved to be safe and effective in selected patients with drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia and could significantly improve quality of life by rapid termination of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia episodes.     

Device Interaction—Antitachycardia Pacemakers and Defibrillators for Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

We evaluated the combined use of permanent automatic antitachycardia pacemakers and implanted defibrillators in fen patients with recurrent monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Pacemaker programming was VVI-T automatic burst in eight patients, VVI-T magnet mode in one patient, and VVI in one patient. Device interactions occurred in four patients, requiring changes in pacemaker programming. These included defibrillator multiple counting during pacing, in-appropriate pacemaker bursts initiating VT, inappropriate reset of the pacemaker antitachycardia mode by defibrillation, defibrillator discharge after pacemaker VT termination, and defibrillator VT reinitiation. Two patients required pacemaker programming out of the antitachycardia mode, and two required a change in antitachycardia pacing parameters. Seven patients remain in automatic VVI-T and three in VVI modes. Mean follow-up is 13 months and all patients are alive. Thus, although pacemaker/ defibrillafor combinations function well for patients with more than one VT rate, device interactions occur frequently and may require pacemaker reprogramming or elimination of the overdrive mode. Combined use of these devices should be cautiously considered when single device therapy is unsatisfactory. Devices that combine both pacing and defibrillation features may reduce adverse interaction.     

Comparison of Two Antitachycardia Pacing Modes in Supraventricular Tachycardia

The comparative efficacy of two different antitachycardia pacing techniques was evaluated in 22 consecutive patients who received the pacemaker Intertach® with an atrial electrode for drug refractory, recurrent Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The Intertach® has two consecutive programmable primary and secondary termination modes. The termination programs investigated were adaptive autodecremental burst pacing and adaptive decremental scanning. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 15 patients and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia due to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in seven patients. The prospective comparison was arranged in a randomized, cross-over study over a period of 12 months. To assess long-term efficacy, diagnostic data of the pacemakers were obtained in intervals of 3 months. In addition, noninvasive programmed stimulation was performed to compare the incidence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation with both termination programs. During a follow-up of 12 months the overall success rate of autodecremental burst pacing and decremental scanning was 80% and 95%, respectively. Decremental scanning was more effective in 12 patients and less successful in two patients than autodecremental burst pacing. During noninvasive electrophysiological studies, pacing induced atrial fibrillation could be documented in three often patients (30%) using autodecremental burst pacing, compared to one often patients (10%) using decremental scanning. These data suggest that decremental scanning proved to be more successful in the long-term management of patients with recurrent S VT than autodecremental burst pacing. Furthermore, the occurrence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation could be documented more frequently with autodecremental burst pacing compared to decremental scanning.     

Termination and Acceleration of Ventricular Tachycardia with Autodecremental Pacing, Burst Pacing, and Cardioversion in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

This multicenter study reports the outcome of ventricular tachycardia (VT) therapy (conversion or acceleration) and the relationship to initial tachycardia cycle length and other clinical variables using an implantable device with the capability of autodecremental or burst pacing, Cardioversion, and defibrillation. The device was implanted in 444 patients (mean age 58 ± 15 years) with 1,240 episodes of VT induced with noninvasive programming and reported in a multicenter database. Only the first sequence attempted for conversion by pacing or Cardioversion was assessed, and Cardioversion energies were 0.2–5 J. Autodecremental pacing was used to treat 700 induced episodes of VT during titration of pacing therapies (57% converted and 12% accelerated), burst pacing to treat 357 episodes (49% converted and 11% accelerated), and Cardioversion to treat 183 episodes (82% converted and 4% accelerated). Cardioversion was the most effective treatment and had the lowest acceleration rate. Shorter VT cycle lengths were more likely to accelerate with burst pacing and longer VT cycle lengths to convert with both burst and autodecremental pacing. Patients with higher ejection fractions were more likely to convert with autodecremental and burst pacing. Use of Cardioversion, higher ejection fraction, absence of unrepaired aneurysm, longer VT cycle lengths, coronary artery disease, and use of autodecremental pacing predicted conversion. Lower ejection fraction and VT cycle lengths ± 300 msec predicted tachycardia acceleration.     

Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

MCCOMB, J.M., ET AL.: Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker. During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers [Intermedics Intertach, 262–12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262–16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 ± 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 ± 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 ± 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 ± 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Determinants of Pace-Terminable Ventricular Tachycardia: Implications for Implantable Antitachycardia Devices

The next generation of implantable antitachycardia devices incorporate anti-tachycardia pacing for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. To evaluate the potential determinants of pace terminability, we analyzed 62 episodes of induced monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. We found that the tachycardia cycle length and cycle length variability are the major determinants of pace terminability. These findings should be considered in the designing of ventricular tachycardia detection and termination algorithms.     

Intravenous Disopyramide Phosphate and Ventricular Overdrive Pacing in the Termination of Paroxysmal Ventricular Tachycardia

Both antiarrhythmic drugs and bursts of rapid ventricular pacing provide alternatives to DC cardioversion for the treatment of paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia. This report considers the individual and combined success of burst ventricular pacing and intravenous disopyramide phosphate in the tretment of 11 examples of paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia. Rapid ventricular pacing, at a rate of up to 50 beats/min faster than the tachycardia rate terminated 7 of the tachycardias. Intravenous disopyramide resulted in increased tachycardiac cycle length (342 +/- 34 ms-385 +/- 56 ms), increased QRS complex width (147 +/- 42 ms-180 +/- 41 ms) and termination of 8 the tachycardias. The remaining 3 tachycardias could be terminated by bursts of ventricular pacing following the infusion of disopyramide. Of these, 2 could not be terminated prior to disopyramide. The use of both techniques allowed the extinction of all 11 tachycardias and prevented the need to proceed to DC conversion.     

Suppression of Electrical Storm by Biventricular Pacing in a Patient with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Tachycardia

TANABE, Y., et al. : Suppression of Electrical Storm by Biventricular Pacing in a Patient with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Tachycardia. This study presents a patient with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who had suffered from multiple ICD shocks. Amiodarone and a β-blocker failed to suppress ventricular tachycardia. His ECG showed a very wide QRS complex with an intraventricular conduction delay, so biventricular (BV) pacing was attempted. The BV pacing successfully prevented the multiple ICD shocks accompanied with an improvement in left ventricular systolic function and physical activity.(PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:101–102)     

Implantable Pacers for Tachycardia Termination: Stimulation Techniques and Long-Term Efficacy

The long-term efficacy of pacing for termination o/supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) was reviewed. Increasingly complex and sophisticated antitachycardia pacing stimulation patterns have evolved, and are outlined. Although excellent results are reported with simple patterns, it may be that the more complex algorithms increase the percentage o/tachycardia patients who may be candidates for implantation of a device. In the papers reviewed, there were 460 patients, 268 with SVT, and 192 with VT. Results were judged to be good-excellent in 96.5% of both VT and SVT groups.