替米沙坦联合氨氯地平治疗老年轻中度高血压患者60例

目前我国高血压患病率高达15％～20％,但知晓率、治疗率、控制率分别仅为30.2％、24.7％和61％[1].因而如何对原发性高血压进行及时、有效地控制已成为临床医师的当务之急.作为最主要的降压手段之一,药物降压常以钙通道阻滞剂为主.因此,本研究选择较为常用的一线药物,探讨替米沙坦联合氨氯地平治疗老年轻中度高血压的可行性.     

替米沙坦联合左旋氨氯地平治疗中重度高血压疗效观察

目的观察替米沙坦联合左旋氨氯地平治疗中重度高血压病的疗效。方法选择我院就诊的中重度高血压病患者32例,给予替米沙坦40.0～80.0mg,1次/d;左旋氨氯地平2.5mg,1次/d;治疗8周后观察其降压效果。结果治疗后血压由(164±21)/(119±11)mmHg下降至(131±13)/(83±9)mmHg,两者差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。结论替米沙坦联合左旋氨氯地平中重度高血压疗效确切,服药方便,不良反应少。     

替米沙坦与苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平联用治疗原发性高血压的疗效观察

目的观察替米沙坦与苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平联用治疗原发性高血压的疗效。方法替米沙坦20～80mg,1次/d,苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平2.5～5mg,1次/d,治疗8周。结果 8周末患者坐位平均收缩压与舒张压均较治疗前降低,收缩压由(170.1±8.5)mmHg降到(118.6±6.8)mmHg,舒张压由(126.8±10.1)mmHg降到(75.6±8.3)mmHg。结论替米沙坦与苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平联用治疗原发性高血压具有良好的安全性与耐受性。     

氨氯地平与替米沙坦联合治疗老年高血压合并早期肾损害的疗效

目的探讨应用氨氯地平与替米沙坦联合治疗老年高血压合并早期肾损害的临床疗效。方法选择2009年6月至2010年6月我院收治的老年高血压患者80例,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各40例。对照组给予苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平,观察组在此基础上加用替米沙坦。观察两组治疗前后血压、肾功能指标变化及不良反应。结果治疗后两组DBP和SBP均较服药前明显降低(P<0.05),观察组下降较对照组更为明显(P<0.05)。治疗后两组SCr、BUN水平均无明显变化(P>0.05),MAU、β2-MG水平均较治疗前显著下降(P<0.05),观察组较对照组下降更为明显(P<0.05)。观察组总有效率为95.0%(38/40),对照组为75.0%(30/40),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组不良反应发生率为12.5%(5/40),观察组为15.0%(6/40),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论氨氯地平与替米沙坦联合治疗老年高血压能够显著提高降压疗效,并改善早期肾损害,且不增加不良反应,值得临床推广应用。     

替米沙坦、依那普利和氨氯地平治疗糖尿病肾病并高血压的疗效

目的:观察替米沙坦、依那普利和氨氯地平治疗糖尿病肾病并高血压的疗效及尿蛋白排泄率的变化。方法:56例糖尿病肾病合并高血压的患者被随机分3组,分别用替米沙坦(80 mg/d)、依那普利(10 mg/d)、氨氯地平(5 mg/d)治疗,共16周。观察血压、尿蛋白含量的变化及药物的不良反应。结果:16周后,3组均能有效降压,有效率分别为66.7％、70％、71.4％、组间无显著差异。替米沙坦和依那普利可降低尿蛋白含量(P<0.05)。结论:替米沙坦、依那普利和氨氯地平治疗糖尿病肾病并高血压疗效均佳,替米沙坦和依那普利还能降低尿蛋白含量。     

氨氯地平、替米沙坦联合生活方式干预治疗高血压的疗效观察

目的观察氨氯地平、替米沙坦联合生活方式干预治疗高血压的临床疗效。方法选择景德镇市第一人民医院2012年4月—2014年3月收治的高血压患者210例,按照治疗方法分为对照组和观察组,每组105例。两组患者入院后均停用其他降压药,对照组患者给予氨氯地平,观察组患者在对照组治疗基础上给予替米沙坦联合生活方式干预。两组患者均连续治疗8周,治疗完成后观察8周,观察期间监测血压1次/周。观察两组患者临床疗效,治疗前后高血压认知、不良生活习惯、情绪稳定情况及治疗期间不良反应情况。结果观察组患者总有效率为87.62%,高于对照组的75.24%(P0.05)。两组患者治疗前高血压认知、不良生活习惯、情绪稳定情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者治疗后高血压认知、不良生活习惯、情绪稳定情况优于对照组(P0.05)。观察组患者治疗期间不良反应发生率为1.91%,低于对照组的7.62%(P0.05)。结论氨氯地平、替米沙坦联合生活方式干预治疗高血压的临床疗效确切,是控制血压达标的有效手段。     

左旋氨氯地平联合替米沙坦治疗老年高血压疗效观察

目的对比观察以左旋氨氯地平为主的不同降压方案治疗老年高血压病人的降压疗效及性别差异。方法将临床确诊的老年高血压患者均先给予左旋氨氯地平2.5mg/d口服,连续2周,血压未能达标的160例患者随机分为"S+T"组(80人)和"S+Y"组(80人),两组分别于晨起时加用替米沙坦80mg和吲达帕胺2.5mg口服,疗程均为8周。结果两组治疗前后24h平均收缩压与舒张压、日间及夜间平均收缩压与舒张压均较治疗前降低(P<0.01);8周后"S+T"组24h平均收缩压与舒张压、日间平均收缩压、夜间平均收缩压均较"S+Y"组下降(P<0.05);男性"S+T"组总有效率高于"S+Y"组(P<0.05),女性"S+T"组总有效率低于"S+Y"组(P>0.05)。结论左旋氨氯地平联合替米沙坦与左旋氨氯地平联合吲达帕胺均能有效降低老年高血压患者血压水平;老年男性使用左旋氨氯地平联合替米沙坦降压疗效优于联合吲达帕胺,且副作用更小;老年女性使用左旋氨氯地平联合替米沙坦与联合吲达帕胺降压疗效相当。     

氨氯地平联合复方阿米洛利或替米沙坦治疗原发性高血压疗效比较

目的比较两种小剂量联合降压方案对原发性高血压患者降压疗效比较。方法将66例原发性高血压患者随机分为两组,分别给予氨氯地平+复方阿米洛利、氨氯地平+替米沙坦两种不同降压方案,于治疗前及治疗后4周、12周、36周、48周、96周,测定各组的血压变化。结果氨氯地平+复方阿米洛利组与氨氯地平+替米沙坦患者经治疗后,收缩压与舒张压与治疗前比较均有显著降低(P<0.05或P<0.01),但两组间收缩压与舒张压差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论两组降压方案均能有效控制血压,作用相当,两组治疗前后心率及各项化验检测指标无显著性变化,不良反应小,均能耐受。     

氨氯地平与替米沙坦联合治疗老年高血压合并早期肾损害45例

研究发现,高血压肾损害已成为老年高血压的主要并发症之一,且肾损害加剧高血压的发展,形成恶性循环[1].为提高疗效,最大程度地减少或避免并发症的发生,国内外临床工作者都在积极探索较为有效的药物使用方案[2,3].本文就我科应用氨氯地平与替米沙坦联合治疗45例老年高血压合并早期肾损害的临床资料进行分析.     

动态血压评价替米沙坦、氯沙坦治疗轻、中度高血压的临床疗效

目的　比较选择性血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂替米沙坦、氯沙坦治疗轻、中度原发性高血压的疗效及安全性。方法　对 77例原发性高血压患者分成两组 ,分别予以替米沙坦 80mg,氯沙坦 5 0mg ,每日一次 ,6周后观察动态血压 (ABPM)评价降压效果。结果　替米沙坦和氯沙坦两组 2 4小时平均动态收缩压 (SBP)、舒张压 (DBP)均明显降低 ,替米沙坦 80mg的降压效果比氯沙坦 5 0mg更好 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,特别是在给药间期的最后 4～ 6小时 ,SBP/DBP替米沙坦降低了12 .3± 14 /7.2± 0 .9mmHg ,氯沙坦降低了 6.0± 1.6/3 .8± 0 .9mmHg(P <0 .0 5 )。结论　替米沙坦 80mg每日用药一次 ,可以保持正常的血压昼夜节律 ,提供 2 4小时血压控制的效果     

A dose-response study of amlodipine in mild to moderate hypertension

The antihypertensive efficacy and suitability for once daily dosing of amlodipine, a new calcium antagonist, was studied in a series of 205 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The study was conducted double-blind in 13 centres. The starting doses of amlodipine were 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg, respectively, which were doubled after 4 weeks if normotension or a preset target blood pressure was not reached. Target blood pressure was reached in 25% of patients with placebo, 41% with 2.5 mg of amlodipine, 56% with 5 mg of amlodipine and 73% with 10 mg of amlodipine once daily. The drug was well tolerated at all dose levels and no changes occurred in heart rate, body weight or electrocardiogram during treatment. Amlodipine is a useful new calcium antagonist for the treatment of hypertension producing smooth, dose-dependent blood pressure reductions with convenient once daily dosing.     

辛伐他汀联合应用氨氯地平和替米沙坦对高血压病患者的降压作用及逆转高血压左室肥厚的效果

目的:比较氨氯地平联合应用替米沙坦(氨+替组)及氨氯地平和替米沙坦联合应用辛伐他汀(氨+替+辛组)对高血压病患者血压及左室肥厚(LVH)的影响,探讨辛伐他汀逆转高血压病LVH的效果。方法:将确诊的79例伴有LVH的高血压病患者随机分配到氨+替组(59例)和氨+替+辛组(20例)。治疗18个月后,观察两组患者心脏形态学、心脏功能及血压水平的变化。结果:①氨+替组及氨+替+辛组高血压病患者经过治疗后,收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、室间隔厚度(IVST)、左室后壁厚度(LVPWT)、左室质量(LVM)、左室质量指数(LVMI)与治疗前比较,均有显著性降低(均P0.01)。②左室舒张早期二尖瓣血流峰速度(E)及晚期血流峰速度(A)比值(E/A)及左室射血分数(LVEF)值与治疗前比较有显著性增高(P0.01)。③氨+替组和氨+替+辛组两组治疗后SBP、DBP差别无显著性差异,但两组间的IVST、LVPWT、LVM、LVMI的改变比较均有显著差异(P0.05),氨+替+辛组对其降低作用的效果更明显。结论:氨+替+辛组有更强的降压、逆转LVH及改善心功能的作用,提示辛伐他汀具有逆转高血压LVH及协同保护心脏的效果。     

Effects of amlodipine and candesartan on oxidized LDL level in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

Objective. To compare the effects of amlodipine and candesartan on oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL), conjugated dienes (CD) and baseline diene conjugation in circulating low-density lipoproteins (LDL-BDC) level during antihypertensive treatment. Methods. Forty-nine patients with untreated mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited in a randomized double-blind study to receive a daily dose either of 8 mg candesartan or 5 mg amlodipine for 16 weeks. Blood pressure, OxLDL, CD, LDL-BDC, triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol and lipoprotein cholesterol were measured at baseline, at week 2 and at week 16. Results. During treatment, in addition to a significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, high level of OxLDL decreased significantly reaching practically upper kit reference values. Both treatment groups were similar with regard to the studied parameters at all time points. At the same time serum TG, lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels as well as LDL-BDC did not change and CD levels did not exceed endemic normal. Decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure was associated with decrease in LDL-BDC/LDL. Conclusions. Besides their antihypertensive effects, both candesartan and amlodipine are efficient drugs for reducing OxLDL level, being neutral with regard to serum lipids.     

Double-blind comparison of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension

In the final analysis of this study at Week 26,26% of the patients randomized to receive amlodipine attained blood pressure control with amlodipine alone compared with 33% of the patients allocated to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). Neither amlodipine nor HCTZ produced clinically significant changes in pulse rate or in the electrocardiogram. Amlodipine treatment did not appear to produce clinically significant changes in blood lipids; HCTZ, however, produced an increase in total plasma cholesterol (Δ22.9 ± 8.6 mg/dl). The incidence of side effects and the rate of patient withdrawal in the amlodipine and HCTZ groups were comparable. As expected, HCTZ therapy caused well-recognized biochemical alterations in cholesterol and potassium levels, whereas amlodipine was metabolically neutral.     

Combination treatment with telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension

BACKGROUND: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is commonly used to treat black patients with hypertension. To avoid the metabolic disturbances associated with high-dose HCTZ, blood pressure control may be achieved by combining low doses with another antihypertensive. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to assess the tolerability and antihypertensive dose-response efficacy of telmisartan and HCTZ and their combination in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension (mean supine blood pressure 140/95-200/114 mmHg). METHODS: Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 222 black patients were randomized to once-daily treatment with one of 20 different double-blind combinations of telmisartan (0, 20, 40, 80, 160 mg) and HCTZ (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25 mg) for 8 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at baseline and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. RESULTS: Telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg reduced supine trough diastolic blood pressure (DBP)--primary efficacy parameter--by 13.3 mmHg, and supine trough systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 21.5 mmHg. These reductions represented benefits of 13.7/8.7 mmHg over telmisartan 80 mg and 12.3/8.1 mmHg over HCTZ 12.5 mg (p < 0.01). Telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg reduced supine trough SBP/DBP by 14.3/10.0 mmHg, amounting to 12.3/3.3 mmHg more than telmisartan 40 mg and 5.1/4.8 mmHg more than HCTZ 12.5 mg. This reached significance for the comparisons with telmisartan 40 mg for SBP and HCTZ 12.5 mg for DBP (p<0.05). A response surface analysis and therapeutic response rates confirmed the additive antihypertensive effects of telmisartan and HCTZ. All treatments were well tolerated, with side-effect profiles comparable with placebo. Adverse events were mainly transient and of mild to moderate severity. CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan 80 mg combined with HCTZ 12.5 mg is effective and well tolerated in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension, providing greater antihypertensive activity than the corresponding monotherapies.     

贝那普利联合氨氯地平治疗轻中度高血压的Meta分析

目的评价贝那普利联合氨氯地平治疗轻中度高m压的临床疗效和安全性。方法检索中周期刊令文数据库、中国乍物医学文献数据库、中文期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、Pubmed、EMBASE、ISIWebofknowledge、CochraneLibrary（从建库至2010年2月）并辅以手工检索。纳入贝那普利联合氨氯地．1平（联合组）与单用贝那普利（单药组）比较治疗原发性高血压的随机对照试验,由两位研究员独妒筛选并提取资料,采用Cochranehandbook5．1．0推荐的质量标准评价纳人研究的质量,采用RevMall5．1．0软件进行统计学处理。结果纳入7项研究。Meta分析结果显示：①两组经药物干预后收缩乐：联合组比单药组降低收缩压更明湿（MD=-6．08,95％C1：-9．03—3．13,P〈O．01）;②两组经药物干预后舒张压：联合组比单药组降低舒张压更明显（MD=-4．88．95％CI：-6．63-3．12,P〈0．01）;③两组治疗措施对心率的影响无统计学差异（MD=0．09,95％C／：-1．28～1．46,P=0．90）;④不良反应：联合组总不良低十译药组。结论现有讪：据表明,贝那普利联合氨氯地平治疗轻中度高血压效果优下叭那普利单药、     

Efficacy and tolerability between an olmesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination and an amlodipine double dose in mild to moderate hypertension

Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are one of the options for improving blood pressure (BP) goal attainment. We enrolled 141 patients and evaluated the efficacy and safety between a fixed dose of olmesartan/amlodipine (OA) and a double dose of amlodipine (DA) for treating mild to moderate hypertension after amlodipine monotherapy failure. After at least 2 weeks of monotherapy failure, the patients were randomized to receive either OA or DA for 8 weeks. We compared the systolic blood pressure (SBP)-lowering efficacy of the OA and DA using both an office BP and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) device. The intent-to-treat analysis found that the early (2nd week) and final visit (8th week) SBP reductions were significantly greater in those patients receiving OA (n = 70) than DA (n = 71) (17.57 ± 15.49 vs. 10.46 ± 13.36 and 24.89 ± 14.09 vs. 17.03 ± 13.27 mmHg, p = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). Among those using ABPM, the patients with 8-week OA had a greater SBP-lowering effect in comparison with those on DA (14.08 ± 10.74 vs. 6.32 ± 10.21, p = 0.018). Both treatment strategies were well tolerated. This study showed that an OA FDC is more effective than DA in reducing SBP for mild to moderate hypertension after the failure of amlodipine monotherapy.     

左旋氨氯地平和氨氯地平治疗轻中度高血压的临床观察

目的评价左旋氨氯地平和氨氯地平治疗轻中度高血压的疗效与不良反应。方法选择门诊轻中度高血压患者108例,随机分为3组,每组36例,接受氨氯地平5 mg/d(A组)、左旋氨氯地平2.5 mg/d(B组)、左旋氨氯地平5 mg/d(C组),共治疗8周,观察降压效果和不良反应。结果 3组治疗后收缩压和舒张压较治疗前明显下降(P<0.05)。与A、B组比较,C组血压变化值更高(P<0.01),血压达标率高(P<0.05)。3组治疗后红细胞计数、血红蛋白较治疗前明显增高(P<0.05);B组血K~+明显降低(P<0.05)。结论左旋氨氯地平能有效降低轻中度高血压患者的血压,不良反应低于氨氨地平,左旋氨氯地平2.5 mg治疗后血K+下降。     

Beneficial cardiometabolic actions of telmisartan plus amlodipine therapy in elderly patients with poorly controlled hypertension

Background

There is a growing body of evidence that blood pressure (BP) level is one of the major determinants of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in individuals, including elderly people. However, to achieve a target BP level in the elderly is more difficult compared with patients aged <65 years. Current guidelines recommend combination drug therapy with different modes of action for the treatment of elderly patients with moderate hypertension (HT). However, the optimal combination regimen is not well established in elderly HT.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that combination therapy of telmisartan plus amlodipine would exert favorable cardiometabolic actions in elderly HT.

Methods

Seventeen elderly patients with essential HT who failed to achieve a target home BP level with treatment of 5 mg amlodipine plus 80 mg valsartan or 8 mg candesartan for at least 2 months were enrolled. Then the patients were assigned to replace their valsartan or candesartan with 40 mg telmisartan. The subjects were instructed to measure their own BP at home every day during the study periods.

Results

Replacement of valsartan or candesartan by telmisartan in amlodipine‐treated elderly hypertensive patients showed a significant reduction in morning home systolic BP and evening home systolic and diastolic BP at 12 weeks. Switching to telmisartan significantly increased serum adiponectin level.

Conclusions

Our present study suggests that combination therapy with telmisartan plus amlodipine may exert more beneficial cardiometabolic effects in elderly patients with HT compared with valsartan or candesartan plus amlodipine treatment. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This work was supported in part by Grants of Collaboration with Venture Companies Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (to S.Y.). The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.     

氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀治疗高血压合并高脂血症的疗效观察

目的 前瞻性评估氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀(多达一)治疗原发性高血压合并高脂血症的疗效和安全性.方法 102 例轻、中度原发性高血压合并高脂血症患者服用多达一1～2 片,共12 周.服药前、后行动态血压监测(ABPM),颈动脉内膜厚度和血脂测定,观察降压效果、不良反应、颈动脉内膜厚度和血脂的变化.结果 多达一能有效降低血压,12 周治疗的有效率为74%.颈动脉粥样斑块平均厚度由(2.03±0.25)mm下降为(1.57±0.21)mm,下降幅度为23%;TC 由(6.19±0.40)mmol/L 下降为(4.39±0.37)mmol/L,下降幅度为29%;LDL-C 由(4.19±0.35)mmol/L 下降为(2.98±0.31)mmol/L,下降幅度为24%;HDL-C 由(1.04±0.23)mmol/L 上升为(1.28±0.26)mmol/L,上升幅度为18%(P＜0.01).多达一不良反应发生率低.结论 多达一能有效控制血压和降低胆固醇,是强化抗动脉粥样硬化的降压药,能提供更多心脑血管保护.