Effects of macular ischemia on the outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of macular ischemia on visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), after intravitreal bevacizumab injections. METHODS: Data on 59 eyes of 53 consecutive patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab for DME were retrospectively reviewed. Data from preoperative fluorescein angiography (FA) tests were examined. Patients with an enlarged foveal avascular zone (FAZ), >or=1000 microm, or a broken perifoveal capillary ring at the border of the FAZ, with a distinct area of capillary nonperfusion within one disk diameter of the foveal center in the transit phase of fluorescein angiography, were defined as having macular ischemia. The patients were thus divided into two groups: with or without macular ischemia. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores, and foveal thicknesses measured using third generation ocular coherence tomography (OCT), were evaluated at baseline and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: At 3 months after treatment, the mean visual acuity (VA) score decreased from a baseline VA of 0.52 +/- 0.27 (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/63) to 0.57 +/- 0.21 (20/80) in the ischemic group. In the nonischemic group, by contrast, the VA improved from 0.66 +/- 0.34 (20/100) at baseline to 0.59 +/- 0.33 (20/80) at 3 months post-treatment. Nine of 18 eyes (50%) in the ischemic group, but only 9 of 41 eyes (21%) in the nonischemic group, experienced visual losses of >or=1 line on the ETDRS chart (P = 0.031, Pearson chi-square test). Four eyes (22%) in the ischemic group, but only 2 eyes (5%) in the nonischemic group, lost >or=3 lines (P = 0.042, Pearson chi-square test). CONCLUSION: Macular ischemia may have a negative effect on short term visual outcomes after intravitreal bevacizumab injections in patients with DME.     

Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, with that of triamcinolone acetonide, a corticosteroid for reduction of diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Prospective, comparative interventional case series. METHODS: Twenty-eight eyes of 14 patients with bilateral DME participated in this study. In each patient, one eye received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide and the other eye received 1.25 mg bevacizumab. The clinical course of best-corrected visual acuity (VA) with a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart and averaged foveal thickness using optical coherence tomography was monitored for up to 24 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Before the injection, foveal thickness and VA were 522.3 +/- 91.3 microm and 0.64 +/- 0.28 microm in the triamcinolone-injected eye, and 527.6 +/- 78.8 microm and 0.61 +/- 0.18 microm in the bevacizumab-injected eye, respectively; there was no significant difference between the eyes. One week after the injection, both eyes showed significant regression of macular edema. The triamcinolone-injected eye (342.6 +/- 85.5 microm and 0.33 +/- 0.21 microm) showed significantly better results than the bevacizumab-injected eye (397.6 +/- 103.0 microm and 0.37 +/- 0.17 microm). However, both eyes showed the recurrence of macular edema with time, even at 24 weeks. Triamcinolone (410.4 +/- 82.4 microm and 0.47 +/- 0.25 microm) kept better results than bevacizumab (501.6 +/- 92.5 microm and 0.61 +/- 0.17 microm). CONCLUSIONS: With the generally used concentration, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide showed better results in reducing DME and in the improvement of VA than that of bevacizumab, suggesting that the pathogenesis of DME is not only attributable to VEGF-dependency, but is also attributable to other mechanisms suppressed by corticosteroid.     

Early effects of systemic and intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early treatment response following systemic and intravitreal bevacizumab therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study 12 eyes with neovascular AMD were treated with 5 mg/kg systemic bevacizumab, and 13 eyes with 1 mg intravitreal bevacizumab. Systemic therapy was given three times at 2-week intervals, intravitreal therapy up to three times at 4-week intervals. Patients were evaluated according to best corrected visual acuity (VA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline as well as at week 1, week 4 and week 12 after therapy. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was performed at baseline and week 12. RESULTS: Systemic and intravitreal bevacizumab therapy showed a treatment response within one week. Visual acuity improved at week 1 by 4.9 letters from baseline in the systemic and by 6.9 letters in the intravitreal treatment group. Central retinal thickness (CRT), as measured by OCT decreased by 51.9 microm and 176.4 microm, respectively. At month 3 a persistent treatment effect was detectable. Mean gain in visual acuity was 11 letters in the systemic and 8.3 letters in the intravitreal group, CRT had decreased by 100 microm and 153.8 microm, respectively. Leakage as evaluated by FA was significantly reduced or absent in all patients. CONCLUSION: The early treatment responses following systemic and intravitreal bevacizumab appear to be similar. Both groups show improvement in VA and decrease in CRT within 1 week and up to 3 months. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate the safety and treatment durability of both treatment modalities using bevacizumab.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a short-term study

PURPOSE: To report the short-term study of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Interventional, consecutive, prospective case series. METHODS: One hundred and two eyes of 102 patients with neovascular AMD received monthly intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) (1.25 mg) until resolution of macular edema, subretinal fluid, and/or pigment epithelial detachment. Outcome measures included visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness as defined from optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: Mean VA was 20/80 and OCT central retinal thickness was 251.0 +/- 74.6 microm before injection and improved to 20/63 and 214.9 +/- 41.7 microm at six weeks (P < .001), 20/50 and 204.8 +/- 33.6 microm at 10 weeks (P < .001), and remained stable at 20/50 and 210 microm after 14 weeks (P < .05). No significant ocular or systemic side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) appears to be beneficial and well tolerated in the treatment of neovascular AMD in the short term. Further comparative evaluation against other antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and dosing schedule is warranted.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To report the change in visual acuity and central retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective case series in a university-based practice evaluated patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to AMD. Patients received intravitreal injections (1.25 mg) of bevacizumab and were monitored monthly with determination of best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity and OCT for persistence of retinal thickening. Eyes were retreated on an "as needed" basis, defined by presence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid. Patients were monitored every 2 months to 3 months for persistence of angiographic leakage. RESULTS: Seventy-nine eyes of 74 consecutive patients received the initial injection of bevacizumab between August 1, 2005, and January 30, 2006. Sixty-eight eyes (86%) of 64 patients had at least 3 months of follow-up. Mean central retinal thickness +/- SD decreased from 304 +/- 83 microm at baseline to 237 +/- 105 microm at 3 months (P = 0.00002). Mean ETDRS visual acuity gained 4 letters from 20/100 at baseline to 20/80-1 at 3 months (P = 0.040). Twenty eyes (25%) appeared to have a sustained response to a single injection and did not require further injections through 3 months. Two patients had a potentially drug-related adverse event (ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction). No serious injection-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab injection affects a rapid decrease in retinal thickness to normal or near-normal levels and improvement in visual acuity in eyes with CNV due to AMD. The sustainability of changes in retinal thickness and visual acuity in response to bevacizumab treatment warrant further investigation and long-term follow-up.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular oedema

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema (DME) refractory to conventional argon macular laser therapy. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive, and noncomparative case series was undertaken involving 38 eyes of 38 patients with refractory DME. Triamcinolone acetonide (4 mg) in 0.1 ml was injected intravitreally. LogMar visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness measured by ocular coherence tomography (OCT) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: All patients completed 6 months of follow up. VA (mean+/-SD) improved from 0.905+/-0.23 to 0.605+/-0.28, 0.555+/-0.29, and 0.730+/-0.30 at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Macular thickness baseline (mean+/-SD) on OCT was 418.7+/-104.2 microm and this decreased to 276.9+/-72.6 microm, 250.6+/-53.1 microm, and 308.8+/-87.3 microm at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IVTA may be a potential temporary treatment for refractory DME. It is effective in decreasing macular thickness and improving VA but the effect lasts approximately for 6 months in the majority of patients. Further investigations are required to establish the safety of IVTA for the treatment of DME.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: 6-month results of an open-label uncontrolled clinical study

PURPOSE: To investigate the 6-month safety and clinical outcomes of intravitreal injections of bevacizumab administered to treat choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients underwent 1.25 mg intravitreal injections of bevacizumab at baseline. A similar intravitreal injection was administered to all eyes at 1 and 2 month follow-up visits. At baseline and at each follow-up visit (1, 2, 3, and 6 months), patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography. Laboratory testing, visual field analyses, and endothelial cell counts were performed at baseline and third and sixth months. RESULTS: At 3 months, the mean BCVA remained substantially stable at 20/100. Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 373 to 279 microm (p<0.01). Mean lesion greatest linear dimension (GLD) decreased from 4087 to 3782 microns (p<0.01). At 6 months, mean BCVA slightly decreased from 20/100(-1) to 20/125(-3) (not significant, p=0.40). Mean CRT was still inferior to baseline (305 microm, p<0.01). Mean lesion GLD was 4186 microm, not different from baseline values (p=0.59), but superior to 3-month mean GLD (p<0.01). Significant visual field defects or endothelial cell losses were not detected at 3 and 6 months. Laboratory testing did not reveal any clinically significant deviations compared to baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal therapy using bevacizumab over 6 months showed stabilization of visual acuity and choroidal neovascularization activity; the safety data were convincing.     

Short-term results of intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema with retinal vein obstruction and diabetic macular edema.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the short-term effect, safety, and durability of intravitreally injected bevacizumab in patients with macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein obstruction (RVO) and diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 39 eyes of 36 patients, 14 with ME caused by RVO and 25 with DME, who received intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg) and were followed up for at least 3 months. Monthly assessments examined safety, best corrected visual acuity with an ETDRS chart (logMAR), and central retinal thickness (CRT) using optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: No significant ocular or systemic side-effects were observed. The follow-up period was 5.4 +/- 1.1 months (mean +/- standard deviation). During follow-up, the mean number of injections was 1.4 +/- 0.5. The baseline mean logMAR was 0.91 +/- 0.51, and the mean CRT was 552.6 +/- 186.7 microm. At 1, 2, and 3 months, the mean logMAR was 0.67 +/- 0.46 (paired t test, P < 0.001), 0.66 +/- 0.46 (P < 0.001), and 0.69 +/- 0.45 (P < 0.001), respectively, and the mean CRT was 323.1 +/- 151.9 mum (P < 0.001), 324.6 +/- 136.9 mum (P < 0.001), and 382.5 +/- 130.4 microm (P < 0.001), respectively. Fourteen (14) of 34 eyes with more than 3 months of follow-up required a second injection at a mean 3.4 +/- 1.0 months after the initial injection. For both ME caused RVO and DME patients, a bevacizumab administration improved logMAR and CRT at each time point through to 6 months, except for logMAR in DME at 1 week (P = 0.081), 5 months (P = 0.130) and 6 months (P = 0.759). CONCLUSIONS: An intravitreal bevacizumab injection for ME caused by RVO and DME was safe and effective for improving visual acuity and reducing CRT.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab injections for treatment of central retinal vein occlusion: six-month results of a prospective trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) injections on visual acuity and foveal retinal thickness in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: In this prospective, noncomparative, consecutive, interventional case series, 46 patients received repeated intravitreal injections (1.25 mg) of bevacizumab. Main outcome measures were visual acuity (Snellen and ETDRS charts) and optical coherence tomography measurements in a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Mean visual acuity improved from 20/250 at baseline to 20/80 at the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001). ETDRS chart findings revealed a mean letter gain +/-SD from baseline to 6 months of 13.9 +/- 14.4 letters. Mean central retinal thickness +/-SD decreased from 535 +/- 148 microm at baseline to 323 +/- 116 microm at the 6-month follow-up. Ischemic CRVO was associated with significantly lower visual acuity than nonischemic CRVO (P < 0.001). However, visual acuity gain was similar in both groups. Independent of duration of symptoms, CRVO was associated with a similar gain in visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab appears to be a new treatment option for patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO.     

Safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for treating macular edema secondary to non-infectious uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective review of sixteen patients (20 eyes) with chronic cystoid macular edema (CME) as a consequence of controlled intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis who received at least one intravitreal injection of TA. Main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), formation or progression of an existing cataract, and CME resolution during the follow-up period. RESULTS: At last follow-up, VA showed improvement (compared to baseline) in 11 eyes (55%), deterioration in three eyes (15%), remained completely unchanged in one eye (5%), and showed improvement initially but returned to baseline levels in five eyes (25%). At last follow-up, CME had relapsed or was still present in 10 of the eyes (50%). The remaining eyes showed complete resolution of the CME, without evidence of recurrence during the follow-up time. Mean VA at last follow-up showed statistically significant improvement (p = 0.02) in nonvitrectomized eyes (mean baseline VA: 1.14 +/- 0.58; mean final VA: 0.96 +/- 0.66) compared to the almost unaltered mean visual acuity for vitrectomized eyes (mean baseline VA: 0.76 +/- 0.41; mean final VA: 0.71 +/- 0.48)(p = 0.40, paired samples t-test). Elevation of IOP was transient in all cases and responded well to topical medications, except for one patient who required placement of an Ahmed valve. Preexisting cataract progressed in three of the 15 phakic eyes (20%). One patient developed a retinal detachment and required additional surgery to reattach it. Patients were followed for a mean of 34 weeks (median: 32 weeks; range: 19-56 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal TA may play a role in the treatment of uveitis-related CME. Further controlled studies are necessary to test this hypothesis.     

Ranibizumab for treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes after intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A review of data for consecutive patients who received intravitreal ranibizumab injection was conducted. The main outcome measures were mean visual acuity and central macular thickness at 3 months compared with those at baseline. Response to ranibizumab therapy was evaluated with particular attention to prior treatment with bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc.). RESULTS: Mean baseline visual acuity of 231 eyes of 231 patients was 20/152, and 189 patients (81.8%) had undergone prior treatment, with 153 (65.4%) having received intravitreal bevacizumab. Mean visual acuity at 3 months, available for 203 patients (88%), was 20/126 (P = 0.004). Mean visual acuity for 98 patients treated with bevacizumab within 3 months before ranibizumab injection was 20/100 at baseline and 20/98 at 3 months (P = 0.35). Mean baseline central macular thickness was 278 microm for all patients and improved to 211 microm at 3 months (P < 0.001). Macular thickness decrease was noted irrespective of previous bevacizumab therapy. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab therapy was associated with significant improvements in mean visual acuity and central macular thickness for the group of all patients. Patients who had received bevacizumab treatment within 3 months before initiating ranibizumab treatment had stability of, but no improvement in, visual acuity.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab for the management of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab for managing choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Seventeen eyes of 17 patients with subfoveal CNV due to AMD participated in this study at the American University of Beirut Ophthalmology Clinics. All patients had failed, refused, or were not eligible for photodynamic therapy. All eyes received a baseline eye examination, which included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), dilated fundus examination, ocular coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, and fluorescein angiography. An intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) was given at baseline and followed by two additional injections at four-week intervals. BCVA, OCT, and fluorescein angiography were repeated four weeks after each injection. Main outcome measures were improvement in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT). RESULTS: Mean baseline BCVA was 20/252 (median 20/200), and baseline CRT was 362 microm (median 350 microm). Improvement in VA and CRT occurred by the fourth week. At 12 weeks, mean BCVA was 20/76 (P < .001) and median BCVA was 20/50 (P < .001). Both mean and median CRT decreased to 211 microm (P < .001). Thirteen (76%) of 17 eyes had total resolution of subretinal fluid, and four eyes (24%) had BCVA better than 20/50. No systemic or ocular side effects were noted at any time. CONCLUSION: Eyes with CNV due to AMD treated with intravitreal bevacizumab had marked anatomic and visual improvement. Further studies are necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of this treatment.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, 6- and 9-month results

PURPOSE: To evaluate 6- and 9-month follow-up data including the effect on vision and anatomic outcome in patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). STUDY DESIGN: Interventional consecutive retrospective case series. Patients received intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular AMD including choroidal neovascular membranes, pigment epithelial detachment, and macular haemorrhage. Ophthalmic evaluation included log MAR or Snellen acuity, ophthalmic examination, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein angiography. Repeat injections were given in the presence of persistent leakage or retinal oedema. Change in vision and foveal thickness from baseline was evaluated using the paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: A total of 112 eyes of 111 patients received injections. Median follow-up was 5 months (range: 1-12 months). Mean log MAR vision pre-injection was 0.84+/-0.03 (n=112); at 3 months was 0.69+/-0.05 (P<0.0001, n=84); at 6 months was 0.74+/-0.06 (P<0.05, n=51); and at 9 months was 0.69+/-0.08 (n=29, P=0.09). Thirteen of 17 patients who received only one injection maintained improved or stable vision at 6 months. Mean baseline foveal thickness was 291+/- 9.72 microm (n=56); at 3 months was 282.7+/-28 (P<0.05, n=31); and at 6 months was 249.7+/-10.3 (P<0.05, n=12). One case of endophthalmitis, three submacular haemorrhages, and three retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tears occurred. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal bevacizumab is an effective treatment for neovascular AMD, resulting in improved vision and foveal anatomy at 6 months and even up to 9 months. This treatment is well tolerated in the majority of patients but adverse events may include endophthalmitis, RPE tears, and submacular haemorrhage.     

Comparison of two doses of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group at 6 months of follow-up

PURPOSE: To report the 6-month anatomical and visual outcomes after injecting two different doses of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: An interventional, retrospective multicenter study of 45 eyes that were treated with at least one intravitreal injection (24 eyes, 1.25 mg; 21 eyes, 2.5 mg) of bevacizumab is reported. The main outcome measures were the central 1-mm macular thickness (CMT) and the change in ETDRS lines of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes were injected on average 26.1 months (range, 3-86 months) after the diagnosis. The average follow-up was 35.2 weeks (range, 24-52 weeks). All patients completed at least 6 months of follow-up. In the 1.25-mg dose group, at 1 month, there was an average gain of 4.5 lines of BCVA; at 3 months, 5.1 lines of BCVA; and at 6 months, 5.1 lines of BCVA (P < 0.005). In the 2.5-mg dose group, at 1 month, there was an average gain of 2.3 lines of BCVA; at 3 months, 3.8 lines of BCVA; and at 6 months, 4.8 lines of BCVA (P = 0.05). In the 1.25-mg dose group, the mean CMT +/- SD decreased from 461 +/- 211 microm at baseline to 321 +/- 152 microm at 1 month, 273 +/- 99 microm at 3 months, and 277 +/- 114 microm at 6 months (P = 0.0002). In the 2.5-mg group, the mean CMT +/- SD decreased from 385 +/- 168 microm at baseline to 279 +/- 111 microm at 1 month, 249 +/- 97 microm at 3 months, and 240 +/- 93 microm at 6 months (P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences between the two dose groups with regard to the number of injections and anatomical and functional outcomes. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab at doses up to 2.5 mg appears to be effective in improving BCVA and reducing CMT in BRVO in the short term. Multiple injections are needed in a large number of eyes for continued control of macular edema and preservation of visual acuity in the short term. Longer studies are needed to determine what role if any intravitreal injection of bevacizumab may play in the long-term treatment of this condition.     

Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab after unresponsive treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab

Objective: To evaluate visual outcomes of eyes with choroidal neovascular membrane secondary to age-related macular degeneration that were initially treated with intravitreal ranibizumab then switched to intravitreal bevacizumab due to treatment failure.Design: Retrospective chart review.Participants: Fifty eyes of 50 patients presenting to the Barnes Retina Institute.Methods: Patients unresponsive to treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab were switched to intravitreal bevacizumab. Main outcome measures included number of intravitreal injections, visual acuity (VA), and resolution of leakage. Mean follow-up was 6 months after the final intravitreal bevacizumab injection. On average, each patient received 3.5 ranibizumab injections and 2.5 bevacizumab injections. Each patient received an average of 6 injections.Results: Resolution of leakage on fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography was achieved in 44 eyes (88%). Initial VA ranged from 20/30 to counting fingers (CF) (median VA 20/125). Final VA ranged from 20/20 to CF (median VA 20/100). Change in VA varied from loss of 2 lines to gain of 4 lines, but overall, remained stable (average gain 0.3 lines). Eighteen eyes (36%) had afinal VA of ≥ 20/50 and 18 eyes (36%) had a final VA of ≤ 20/200.Conclusions: Treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab may be effective, as measured by visual and anatomic criteria, in patients who are unresponsive to treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for retinal angiomatous proliferation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term visual acuity and anatomic responses after intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) treatment in patients with retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent RAP treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg) during a 3-month period. Complete ocular examination was performed at baseline and follow-up visits. Interval data were analyzed statistically at 1 and 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-three eyes of 23 patients underwent intravitreal bevacizumab treatment. The mean age of patients was 81.1 years, median baseline visual acuity of treated eyes was 20/80 (range 20/25-20/800), and mean baseline central macular thickness was 335 mum (optical coherence tomography was available for 22 eyes). Nine eyes had retinal pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) at baseline. At 1-month follow-up, the median acuity improved to 20/60 (range 20/30-20/400) (P < 0.001), mean central macular thickness decreased to 202 microm (P < 0.001), and PED was present in only 2 eyes (P = 0.016). Seven of 23 eyes at 1 month (30.4%) had improved visual acuity, defined as halving of the visual angle, and no eyes had worse acuity, defined as doubling of the visual angle. Of the 17 eyes available for 3-month follow-up, 5 eyes (29.4%) had better visual acuity, 1 eye (5.9%) had worse acuity, and the remaining 11 (64.7%) had the same acuity. The median visual acuity at month 3 was 20/60 (range 20/25-20/400). There were no thromboembolic phenomena, endophthalmitis cases, retinal detachments, or any other adverse events. CONCLUSION: Treatment of RAP with intravitreal bevacizumab during this retrospective review resulted in a significant decrease in macular thickness and improvement or stabilization of visual acuity. Further long-term investigation is warranted given the promising short-term results.     

Short-term effects of intravitreal bevacizumab for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia

PURPOSE: To determine short-term effects of intravitreal bevacizumab for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in pathologic myopia. METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series, patients were treated with 2.5 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab and followed for 3 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FA) were recorded. Indications for retreatment were active leaking CNV shown by FA and presence of subretinal fluid by OCT in combination with visual disturbances. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included, with a mean age of 53.86 +/- 16.26 years (range 29-85). Mean spherical equivalent was -13.87 +/- 3.68 diopters (-7.25 to -20.50). Minimum follow-up was 3 months. There were no adverse events. The mean initial visual acuity was 20/200 improving to 20/100 at 2 weeks, 20/80 at 4 weeks, and 20/60 at 8 and 12 weeks (P=0.007; P=0.001; P=0.005; P=0.001, respectively). Initial foveal thickness improved from 385.43 microm +/- 125.83 microm to 257.64 +/- 76.6 microm and 194.54 +/- 54.35 microm after the first and third month, respectively (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Initial treatment results of patients with CNV due to pathologic myopia did not reveal any short-term safety concerns. Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in a significant decrease in foveal thickness and improvement in visual acuity. These favorable initial results support further larger and long-term studies.     

Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomic and visual acuity (VA) results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME), and to review the literature on the topic. METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series of patients who underwent PPV with ILM peeling for diffuse DME between January 1, 2000, and December 1, 2005, performed by three surgeons at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Main outcome measures included pre- and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity. Mean follow-up period was 8 months (range, 43 days-2 years). RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of 23 patients meeting the criteria were evaluated. Duration of DME ranged from 1 to 93 months. Mean preoperative logMAR vision was 0.782 (range, 0.30-1.82). Mean logMAR visual acuity at final follow-up was 0.771 (range, 0.10-2.00). At last follow-up, 25% of eyes had > or =2 line increase in VA from baseline, 54% of eyes had no improvement in VA, and 21% of eyes had > or =2 line decrease in VA. Of 9 eyes with pre- and postoperative OCT, there was an overall reduction in central macular thickness of 141 microm at postoperative month 3 and 120 microm at last follow-up. Postoperative complications included progression of cataract in 6 (60%) of 10 phakic eyes, postoperative intraocular pressure > or =30 mmHg in 6 (24%) eyes, and postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 2 (8%) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling was associated with a reduction in DME when measured by OCT in the majority of eyes, but visual acuity outcomes showed minimal improvement compared to baseline. These results suggest the efficacy of PPV with ILM peeling for eyes with DME has not been well established and should be reserved for therapy with selected cases.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab combined with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of occult choroidal neovascularization associated with serous pigment epithelium detachment in age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with serous pigment epithelium detachment (s-PED) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: In this retrospective study, six patients (six eyes) with subfoveal occult CNV associated with s-PED due to AMD were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab combined with PDT. All patients were treated at baseline with PDT followed by intravitreal bevacizumab 1.25 mg 1 hour later. Afterwards, according to the findings of optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography, repeat bevacizumab injections were given, if necessary, monthly for three doses followed by further doses every 3 months. PDT was repeated every 3 months according to the same criteria. Follow-up time was 9 months. RESULTS: All patients completed their treatment during the first 3 months from baseline. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved or remained stable related to the baseline values in all patients at the end of the follow-up time. Mean BCVA improved from 20/67 to 20/42. S-PED and subretinal fluid decreased or disappeared. The mean central 1-mm retinal thickness was reduced from baseline value for the 9-month follow-up period by 128 microm. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal bevacizumab combined with PDT seems to be a promising treatment with good functional and anatomical results for occult CNV associated with s-PED due to AMD.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) injection alone or combined with triamcinolone versus macular photocoagulation as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To report the efficacy of a single intravitreal bevacizumab injection alone or in combination with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus macular laser photocoagulation (MPC) as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this randomized, three-arm clinical trial, 103 eyes of 97 patients with clinically significant DME and no previous treatment were enrolled. The eyes were randomly assigned to one of three study arms: the intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) group, patients who received 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab (37 eyes); the IVB/IVT group, patients who received 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab and 2 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone (33 eyes); and the MPC group, patients who underwent focal or modified grid laser (33 eyes). Primary outcome measure was change in visual acuity. RESULTS: Visual acuity changes +/- SD at 12 weeks were -0.22 +/- 0.23, -0.13 +/- 0.31, and + 0.08 +/- 0.31 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the IVB, IVB/IVT, and MPC groups, respectively. The marginal regression model based on generalized estimating equation analysis demonstrated that the visual acuity changes in the groups were statistically significant at both 6 weeks (P < 0.0001) and 12 weeks (P = 0.024). The significant treatment effect was demonstrated at both 6 weeks and 12 weeks in the IVB group and only at 6 weeks in the IVB/IVT group. Significant central macular thickness (CMT) reduction was observed in eyes in the IVB and IVB/IVT groups only up to 6 weeks; however, CMT changes were not significant in the groups. CONCLUSION: Up to 12 weeks, intravitreal bevacizumab treatment of patients with DME yielded better visual outcome than laser photocoagulation, although it was not associated with a significant decrease in CMT. No further beneficial effect of intravitreal triamcinolone could be demonstrated. Further clinical trials with longer follow-up are required to evaluate the long-term visual outcomes and complication profiles after primary treatment with such medications.