Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection,prediction, recurrence and prognosis

Screening mammograms comprising of 32 first round, 10 interval and 32 second round detected cancers and 46 normal were examined by an expert screener, a screening radiologist, a clinical radiologist and a computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system. The expert screener, screening radiologist, clinical radiologist and the CAD detected 44, 41, 34 and 37 cancers, respectively, while their respective specificities were 80%, 83%, 100% and 22%. Later, with CAD prompting, the screening and the clinical radiologist detected 1 and 3 additional cancers each with unchanged specificities. Screening mammograms comprising 35 first round, 12 interval and 14 second round detected cancers and 89 normal findings were examined without and with previous mammograms by experienced screeners. Without previous mammograms, the screeners detected 40.3 cancers with a specificity of 87%. With previous mammograms, 37.7 cancers were detected with a 96% specificity. The decrease in sensitivity was not significant but the screeners showed significant increase in specificity. Local recurrences in 303 nonpalpable breast cancers with preoperative localizations and breast conservation therapy were evaluated for needle-caused implant metastasis. A total of 214 percutaneous biopsies were performed. There were 33 local recurrences. Needle-caused seeding or implantation as based on the location of the recurrence in comparison to the needle path in the mammograms was suspected in 3/44 (7%) invasive cancers without radiotherapy. The mammographic characteristics of 317 nonpalpable breast cancers were categorized. Logistic regression showed that the risk ratios for a spiculated mass without calcifications and calcifications alone were 12 and 19 for invasive cancer and ductal cancer in situ (DCIS), respectively. Invasive ductal grade 1, ductal grade 2, lobular and ductal grade 3, had a risk ratio (RR) of 28, 17, 11 and 4.6, respectively, for a spiculated mass without calcifications. DCIS nuclear grade 3 and invasive ductal grade 3 had an RR of 17 and 9.7, respectively, for sole casting calcifications. The eight-year survival of 96 1-9-mm invasive breast cancers were investigated in relation to their mammographic appearance, node status and histologic grade. After a median follow-up of 7 years, 6/96 died from breast cancer: 3/14 had calcifications alone, 2/56 had spiculated masses, 1/12 had rounded mass, 5/78 were node-negative and 1/4 was node-positive. The survival rate was 93%: 77% for the calcifications alone, 95% for spiculated masses, 91% for rounded masses, 92% for node-negative and 75% for node-positive. Calcifications alone and node positivity, each, carried a significantly higher risk of death.     

Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the degree with which mammographic features predict the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant mammographic microcalcification lesions without a mass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammographic features were correlated with pathologic features in 304 consecutive breast carcinomas manifested by mammographic calcifications only in a prospective evaluation. RESULTS: Mammographic calcifications associated with breast carcinoma had the final pathologic diagnoses of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 65% of patients, DCIS with a focus of invasion in 32%, and invasive carcinoma only in 4%. Invasive foci were more likely associated with mammographic calcification size of 11 mm and greater (40%, 77/194) compared with 1-10 mm (26%, 29/110; p = 0.019). Invasive foci were also more likely associated with linear calcifications (44%, 55/126) compared with granular calcifications (29%, 51/178; p = 0.007). The frequency of invasion did not increase with calcification extents greater than 10 mm. The frequency of invasion ranged from 22% for less than or equal to 5-mm granular calcifications to 45% for linear calcifications of 11 mm and greater. Only 11% of cancers characterized by fine granular calcifications were associated with invasion as compared with 32% of those with coarse and mixed granular calcifications (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Mammographic calcification features of malignant lesions cannot predict the absence of invasion with greater than 90% predictive value or predict the presence of invasion with greater than 45% predictive value. Increased extent of calcifications greater than 10 mm was not associated with greater likelihood of invasion.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted?

PURPOSE: To determine whether mammographic or histologic features can be used to predict which cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without invasion by means of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) will have invasive disease at surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1992 to March 1999, DCIS without invasion was diagnosed by means of SCNB in 59 patients. Seventeen (29%) were found to have invasive disease after surgery. The underestimation rate for SCNB was compared with that obtained by means of open surgical biopsy. Mammographic and histologic features of cases with and those without invasion were compared. RESULTS: All patients had calcifications on mammograms. There was no significant difference (P: =.26) between the underestimation rate for SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device and that for open surgical biopsy. No statistically significant differences between cases with and those without invasion were seen in patient age, mean number of core specimens, level of suspicion, size of lesion, distribution and morphology of the calcifications, presence of an associated mass or density, subtype of DCIS, nuclear grade, or presence of necrosis or desmoplasia. CONCLUSION: Mammographic and histologic features cannot be used reliably to predict cases that are underestimated with SCNB. However, SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device was as reliable as open surgical biopsy for diagnosing DCIS without invasion.     

临床不能扪及的乳腺导管原位癌及其早期浸润的X线征象分析

目的:分析临床不能扪及的乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)及其早期浸润的X线征象。方法:经手术、病理证实的乳腺导管原位癌16例和原位癌伴早期浸润9例,观察其X线表现,并与病理对照。结果:25例X线表现均为钙化,其中按钙化形态分导管原位癌以碎石样钙化为主(6/16,37.5%),原位癌伴早期浸润以杆状钙化为主(5/9,55.56%);按钙化分布分,导管原位癌以成簇钙化为主(11/16,68.75%),原位癌伴早期浸润以成簇、段样为主(两者均为4/9,44.44%)。结论:DCIS及其早期浸润的X线表现有一定特征,通过乳腺X线检查,可提高DCIS及其早期浸润的检出率。     

The correlation of mammographic-and histologic patterns of breast cancers in BRCA1 gene mutation carriers, compared to age-matched sporadic controls

Breast cancers in BRCA1 gene mutation carriers often have specific histologic features: grade III tumors with pushing margins. Our purpose was to compare the mammographic and histologic features of breast cancers in carriers with those in age-matched sporadic controls. The features of breast cancers in 27 BRCA1 carriers found during annual surveillance were compared to those in 107 age-matched sporadic controls. The carriers had no (classic) spiculated mammographic lesions, a high percentage of well-defined masses and hardly any masses with microcalcifications, whereas the controls had significantly fewer well-defined ones and only in 27% spiculated lesions on the mammogram. The well-defined mammographic tumors correlated in 83% of the carriers and in 70% of the controls with histologic circumscribed tumor margins. Spiculated mammographic lesions in the controls were in 90% grade I or II tumors. DCIS with or without infiltration was seen in 22% of the carriers and in 45% of the controls. In conclusion, breast cancers diagnosed in BRCA1 carriers do not have classic malignant mammographic features. A minority of the young sporadic controls show the classic malignant lesion on the mammogram. Both carriers and controls generally show a good correlation between their mammographic- and histologic tumor pattern.     

Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity of the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system applied to full-field digital mammograms for detection of breast cancers in a screening group, with histologic findings as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval, and patient informed consent was waived. A commercially available CAD system was applied to the digital mammograms of 103 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 35-69 years) with 103 breast cancers detected with screening. Sensitivity values of the CAD system according to mammographic appearance, breast composition, and histologic findings were analyzed. Normal mammograms from 100 women (mean age, 54 years; age range, 35-75 years) with no mammographic and clinical abnormality during 2-year follow-up were used to determine false-positive CAD system marks. Differences between the cancer detection rates in fatty and dense breasts for the CAD system were compared by using the chi(2) test. RESULTS: The CAD system correctly marked 99 (96.1%) of 103 breast cancers. The CAD system marked all 44 breast cancers that manifested as microcalcifications only, all 23 breast cancers that manifested as a mass with microcalcifications, and 32 (89%) of 36 lesions that appeared as a mass only. The sensitivity of the CAD system in the fatty breast group was 95% (59 of 62) and in the dense breast group was 98% (40 of 41) (P = .537). The CAD system correctly marked all 31 lesions of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), all 22 lesions of invasive ductal carcinoma with DCIS, the single invasive lobular carcinoma lesion, and 45 (92%) of 49 lesions of invasive ductal carcinoma. On normal mammograms, the mean number of false-positive marks per patient was 1.80 (range, 0-10 marks; median, 1 mark). CONCLUSION: The CAD system can correctly mark most (96.1%) asymptomatic breast cancers detected with digital mammographic screening, with acceptable false-positive marks (1.80 per patient).     

Mammographic features of nonpalpable spiculated lesions

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mammographic features of nonpalpable spiculated lesions in order to find differentiating findings between malignant and benign pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard mammograms of 27 patients with 28 nonpalpable spiculated lesions were evaluated retrospectively. Two dimensions of dense centre of the spiculated lesions were measured and the mean dimensions were compared in analysing the malignant and benign features. Fine radiolucent lines between dense spicules were noted. RESULTS: Thirteen spiculated lesions (46.4%) were malignant and 15 were benign. Eleven malignant lesions (84.6%) have dense centre larger than 5 mm, whereas only four benign lesions (26.7%) had a dense core larger than 5 mm. There were fine radiolucent lines parallel to dense spicules in 5 malignant lesions (38.5%) and in 13 benign lesions (86.7%). Only one invasive carcinoma and one radial scar with florid ductal epithelial hyperplasia and papillomatosis had punctate calcifications. The sensitivity and specificity of the dense core larger than 5 mm for malignancy were 84.6% and 73.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of radiolucent lines for benign lesions was 86.7% and the specificity was 61.5%. CONCLUSION: When the dense centre of a nonpalpable spiculated lesion is larger than 5 mm, the probability of malignant pathology increases. The fine radiolucent lines between dense spicules may indicate benign etiology. However, there is no reliable mammographic feature differentiating benign spiculated lesions from carcinomas. Therefore, all of them should be diagnosed pathologically unless they are postsurgical.     

Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and positive predictive value of ductal enhancement among MR imaging-detected breast lesions that had biopsy and to assess the histologic findings associated with ductal enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 427 nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MR imaging-guided needle localization and surgical biopsy. Lesions were reviewed by one radiologist who was unaware of the histologic outcomes and were classified according to a standardized lexicon. MR imaging and histologic findings of ductal enhancing lesions were reviewed. RESULTS: Ductal enhancement accounted for 88 (21%) of 427 lesions and 88 (59%) of 150 nonmass lesions. Histologic finding in these 88 lesions were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 18 (20%); infiltrating carcinoma in five (6%), including three with DCIS; lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) in nine (10%); atypical ductal hyperplasia in eight (9%); and benign in 48 (55%). Among the 48 benign lesions, the dominant histologic findings were fibrocystic change (n = 16); ductal hyperplasia (n = 8); fibrosis (n = 8); postbiopsy change (n = 5); benign breast tissue (n = 3); sclerosing adenosis (n = 2); and single cases of fibroadenoma, fibroadenomatoid change, lymph node, mastitis, papilloma, and radial scar. Factors associated with a trend toward a higher frequency of carcinoma included clumped enhancement (p = 0.05) and synchronous ipsilateral cancer (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Ductal enhancement accounted for 21% of MR imaging-detected lesions that had biopsy and had a positive predictive value of 26%. Differential diagnosis of ductal enhancement includes carcinoma (usually DCIS); atypical ductal hyperplasia; LCIS; and benign findings such as fibrocystic change, ductal hyperplasia, and fibrosis.     

Mammographic pattern of microcalcifications in the preoperative diagnosis of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The comedo subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is more aggressive than noncomedo DCIS. Differentiating noncomedo DCIS from the more aggressive comedo subtypes on mammography would allow the surgeon to excise comedo DCIS with a wider margin. The mammographic features of microcalcifications associated with nonpalpable comedo DCIS, noncomedo DCIS and benign disease were compared to determine the usefulness of this finding in diagnosis of comedo DCIS. METHODS: The authors retrospectively and blindly reviewed the mammograms of 91 consecutive patients in whom DCIS was diagnosed by needle localization and surgical excision. An equal number of cases of benign microcalcifications were also reviewed. Microcalcifications were evaluated with respect to pattern, density, configuration and size. These results were correlated with the pathologic findings. RESULTS: All 16 cases (100%) of linear branching calcifications and 34 (80%) of the 43 cases of linear calcifications were associated with comedo DCIS (p < 0.001). The number of calcifications, the density and the size of clustering were not diagnostic of comedo DCIS. Granular calcifications occurred in noncomedo DCIS and in benign disease associated with noncalcifying DCIS. CONCLUSION: Comedo DCIS is suggested by the presence of linear and linear branching microcalcifications on mammography.     

How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme?

PURPOSE: To compare the histological grades of screen detected and non-screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to identify any differences that might support the contention that DCIS found by breast screening represents an over-diagnosis. The aim was also to establish whether any particular mammographic features of DCIS can be used to predict tumour grade reliably. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsy proven cases of DCIS (n=153) were reviewed with respect to grade and subdivided into high, intermediate and low grades using the Van Nuys classification. A more aggressive subset of DCIS (microinvasive and interval cancers) were similarly analysed. Mammograms were reviewed with regard to abnormal features and distribution, and the appearances correlated with grade. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent (53/98) of screen detected and 62% (34/52) of non-screen detected DCIS were high grade. The rest were equally intermediate and low grade, with no statistical difference between the two groups. Eighty-four percent of the aggressive subset of tumours were high grade. Micro-calcification was present in 90% and in 10% there were soft tissue changes alone. Seventy-six percent of linear branching calcification was associated with high grade DCIS. Only 13% of high grade DCIS demonstrated punctate micro-calcification; however, 38% of cases of punctate micro-calfication were associated with high grade tumours and there was a great deal of overlap between the groups. CONCLUSION: Most cases of DCIS in both screen and non-screen detected groups were high grade. Only one in five was low grade. Analysis of the aggressive subgroup underlines the significance of high grade DCIS. Mammographic patterns are not always reliable in the prediction of tumour grade. The detection of DCIS in screening programmes is important and should not be regarded as over-diagnosis.     

Prediction of aortoiliac stent-graft length: comparison of measurement methods

PURPOSE: To evaluate short-term follow-up of nonpalpable probably benign lesions in a 2-year mammographic screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 13,790 women aged 45-65 years who underwent first-round screening, 795 (5.8%) underwent short-term mammographic follow-up (every 6 months for 2 years) of nonpalpable probably benign lesions (eg, masses, focal asymmetric densities, and calcifications) previously assessed at an additional imaging evaluation, including ultrasonography. When no changes were found at short-term mammographic follow-up, women were assigned to the 2-year screening interval. Needle localization and surgical biopsy were performed when the lesion progressed (was enlarged or had an increased number or size of calcifications or modification of their initial characteristics). The effectiveness of this approach was evaluated with statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 795 lesions, 788 (99%) remained stable, and seven (1%) had changes prompting surgical biopsy. Two cancers (0.3%), one microinvasive intraductal carcinoma and one 7-mm invasive ductal carcinoma without positive nodes, were found. Four of the five benign histologic results were probably benign calcifications with progression at short-term follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 99%, 99%, 29%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The benign nature of most nonpalpable probably benign lesions can be typified with short-term mammographic follow-up. This approach permitted identification of a few low-stage carcinomas, but progression in the probably benign calcifications was usually unrelated to malignancy.     

Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions]

PURPOSE: The natural history of human breast cancer shows that lesion size correlates directly with nodal metastases and distant spread. Nodal metastases are found in only 6% of cases in the preclinical stage of the tumor and therefore imaging must detect a breast cancer before it becomes palpable. We reviewed 215 nonpalpable breast lesions studied in the last 10 years to assess observers performance and ultimately improve the interpretation of suspicious mammograms, evaluating "cost" in terms of the ratio between benign and malignant lesions (B/M). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1988 to October 1998, two hundred and fifteen women with nonpalpable breast lesions suspected at mammography were examined. The lesions were removed after stereotaxic or US location and a radiograph of the surgical specimen was always performed. Mammographic patterns were interpreted retrospectively by two blinded radiologist experienced in breast imaging and specialized in locating nonpalpable breast lesions. Mammographic patterns were classified as poorly/highly suspicious calcifications, regular/irregular masses, spiculated masses, masses with calcifications and parenchymal distortions. Radiographic findings were compared with surgical results and the data used to calculate the B/M, positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy and the trend of operator's performance. RESULTS: Modern techniques permit to detect a very high number of in situ breast carcinomas. Nineteen of 22 lesions (86%) were detected by mammography as highly suspicious calcifications, 2/22 as spiculated masses and 1/22 as a mass with calcifications. No in situ carcinoma was detected as an irregular mass. All regular masses were proven to be benign at histology. B/M analysis showed a decreasing trend (from 1.94 in the first 3 years to .57 in 1994-96, to .83 in 1997-98) and an overall value of .90. The PPV for malignancy was 83.33% for spiculated masses, 65.5% for highly suspicious calcifications, 63.63% for irregular masses, 47.05% for masses with more or less dysmorphic calcifications, 32.65% for poorly suspicious calcifications, 8.33% for parenchymal distortions and 0% for regular masses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: All spiculated masses and highly suspicious calcifications and microcalcifications should be removed. Biopsy is recommended in parenchymal distortions, despite its low predictive value for malignancy, because these lesions are uncommon and the cost of biopsy is therefore acceptable. Needle aspiration or long-term monitoring can be reconsidered for irregular masses and poorly suspicious microcalcifications. Finally, relative to possible different interpretations of mammographic patterns by center and operator's experience, we suggest that the PPV for every single pattern be continually reassessed based on personal case records rather than on literature data. This holds true especially for microcalcifications.     

Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of stereotactically and sonographically guided core biopsy (CB) for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two institutions enrolled 2,403 women who underwent imaging-guided fine needle aspiration followed by imaging-guided large-CB of nonpalpable breast abnormalities. All mammograms were reviewed for study eligibility by one of two breast imaging radiologists. The protocol for image-guided biopsy, using either ultrasound (USCB) or stereotactic (SCB) guidance, was standardized at all institutions and all biopsy specimens were over-read by one of three expert pathologists. Patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia, or lobular neoplasia on CB underwent surgical excision. Those with negative CB but suspicious ("discordant") pre-biopsy mammography also underwent surgical excision. Patients having a negative CB that was concordant with the pre-biopsy mammography suspicion were assigned to follow-up mammography at 6, 12, and 24 months following CB. RESULTS: A gold standard diagnosis based on definitive histopathologic diagnosis, mammography follow-up, or an imputed gold standard diagnosis was established for 1,681 patients. Of 310 cases with a gold standard diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma, 261 (84.2%) were invasive carcinoma, 31 (10%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), four (1.3%) were ADH, one (0.3%) was a non-breast cancer, and 13 (4.2%) were benign on CB. For 138 cases with a gold standard diagnosis of DCIS, 113 (81.9%) were DCIS, 20 (14.5%) were ADH, and five (3.6%) were benign on CB. For 57 cases (13 masses, 44 calcifications) with an initial CB diagnosis of ADH, atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular neoplasia, 20 (35.1%) had a gold standard diagnosis of DCIS (4 masses, 16 calcifications) and four (7.0%) had a gold standard diagnosis of invasive cancer (4 calcifications). Of 144 cases (22 masses, 122 calcifications) with an initial CB diagnosis of DCIS, 31 (21.5%) had a gold standard diagnosis of invasive cancer (10 masses, 21 calcifications). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CB by either imaging guidance method in this trial were .91, 1.00, and .98, respectively. The sensitivity, predictive value negative, and accuracy of CB for diagnosing masses (.96, .99, and .99, respectively) were significantly greater (P < .001) than for calcifications (.84, .94, and .96, respectively). The sensitivity (.89) of SCB for diagnosing all lesions was significantly lower (P = 0.029) than that of USCB (.97) because of the preponderance of calcifications biopsied by SCB versus USCB. There was no difference between USCB and SCB in sensitivity, predictive value negative, or accuracy for the diagnosis of masses (97.3, 98.9, and 99.2, respectively for USCB; 95.6, 98.5, and 98.9 respectively for SCB). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous, imaged-guided core breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic alternative to surgical biopsy in women with mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.     

When is a diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis acceptable at core biopsy?

PURPOSE: To determine concordance of imaging findings and diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis at histopathologic core biopsy and to establish the accuracy of core biopsy when cancer was coexistent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a database of 1,166 percutaneous biopsies in which sclerosing adenosis was reported, 88 (7.5%) lesions were identified, and imaging and histopathologic findings were reviewed for concordance. Sclerosing adenosis proved to be a minor component at core biopsy for 44 lesions, including one invasive ductal carcinoma, one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), one focus of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), and one atypical lobular hyperplasia. Sclerosing adenosis was a major (> or =50%) component for 44 lesions, including four malignancies, all DCIS manifested as clustered calcifications (pleomorphic [n = 2] or amorphous [n = 2]), and seven foci of ADH manifested as amorphous calcifications. In 30 patients with 33 lesions without atypia or malignancy, sclerosing adenosis was the major finding at core biopsy (21 lesions at 14-gauge core biopsy and 12 at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy); these patients formed the study population. Mammographic (33 lesions) and sonographic (18 lesions) features were recorded. Twenty-seven lesions had at least 20-month follow-up (n = 25) or excision (n = 2). RESULTS: One spiculated mass was considered discordant and was excised, showing a prospectively unrecognized radial sclerosing lesion with several 2-5-mm foci of invasive tubular and lobular carcinoma. Seventeen (53%) of 32 lesions manifested as masses; 10 (59%) were circumscribed, five (29%) were indistinctly marginated (one with punctate calcifications), and two (12%) were partially circumscribed and partially obscured (one with amorphous calcifications). Fifteen (47%) lesions manifested as clustered calcifications; nine (60%) were amorphous and indistinct, four (27%) were pleomorphic, and two (13%) were punctate. Of 27 lesions with acceptable follow-up, 26 (96%) were believed to have been accurately sampled at core biopsy. Of six radial sclerosing lesions associated with the original 88 lesions, only three (50%) were prospectively recognized. CONCLUSION: Sclerosing adenosis is an acceptable result at core biopsy of circumscribed masses and nonpalpable indistinctly marginated masses and for clustered amorphous, pleomorphic, and punctate calcifications. Recognition and reporting of coexistent radial sclerosing lesions is encouraged and may prompt excision. Malignancy can be seen with sclerosing adenosis; core biopsy was accurate in six (86%) of seven coexistent malignancies in this series.     

Mammographic bi-dimensional product: a powerful predictor of successful excision of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to ascertain whether uni-dimensional measurement of mammographic microcalcification, the product of bi-dimensional measurement, calcification morphology, and pathological grade are helpful in predicting successful single therapeutic wide local excision (WLE) of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: The study group comprised 505 patients whose mammograms showed the DCIS as calcification, and in whom a non-operative diagnosis had been obtained and WLE attempted. The extents of mammographic calcifications was measured in two planes at 90 degrees on the oblique view, the appearances classified as comedo, granular, or punctate. DCIS was graded using cyto-nuclear characteristics. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-two patients had a successful first WLE and 163 patients had further surgery. A uni-dimensional measurement of <35 mm and a bi-dimensional product of <800 mm(2) were associated with successful excision (69 versus 54%, p=0.02 and 70 versus 27%, p=0.0001, respectively). Mammographic calcification morphology and histological grade did not influence the likelihood of a successful first WLE. For high-grade DCIS, the upper limit of the bi-dimensional product associated with successful WLE was 800 mm(2) (69 versus 24%, p=0.0003). In contrast, for non-high-grade DCIS, the cut-off was 400 mm(2) (73 versus 33%, p=0.01). Analyses based on mammographic calcification morphology gave similar findings. CONCLUSION: The mammographic bi-dimensional product is a powerful predictor of successful WLE of DCIS when combined with histological grade and/or calcification morphology.     

Mammographic appearance of calcifications as a predictor of intraductal carcinoma histologic subtype

We reviewed 109 consecutive cases of intraductal carcinoma to evaluate the association between histologic subtype (comedo = 35, non-comedo = 71, mixed = 3) and calcification type, as assessed by histology (amorphous vs. crystalline) or by mammography (coarsely granular, irregular shape, linear, branching vs. fine granular, irregular, or more or less regular oval or circular forms). Calcifications were microscopically or mammographically detected in 90.8% and 76.1% of cases, respectively, and a significant association was found between microscopic (amorphous) and mammographic (coarse granular, linear, branching) calcified types and histologic comedo subtypes (P <0.001). Nevertheless, accurate prediction of the histologic subtype on the basis of mammographic calcifications occurred only in 78.3% of cases with calcifications, and in 59.6% of all cases. Mammography is not a reliable method to predict DCIS histologic subtype at the present time. Correspondence to: S. Ciatto     

早期乳腺癌的CR表现及病理基础

目的评价早期乳腺癌的CR表现及其病理基础。方法回顾性分析经病理证实的43例早期乳腺癌的CR片,包括导管原位癌及导管原位癌伴微浸润30例、浸润性导管癌12例和浸润性小叶癌1例,观察早期乳腺癌的CR表现,并与病理对照。结果(1)43例早期乳腺癌中,CR表现钙化21例(49%),结节15例(35%),非对称性局限性密度增高影伴结构紊乱7例(16%)。(2)乳腺数字化图像可以显示早期乳腺癌病变的细微结构。结论乳腺CR成像对早期乳腺癌的诊断具有重要意义。     

Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy.

PURPOSE: To assess the pathologic outcome of amorphous breast calcifications and the success of stereotactic biopsy for such lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1995 through February 2000, biopsy of all clustered amorphous calcifications not clearly stable for at least 5 years or in a diffuse scattered distribution was recommended. Logistic regression analysis was used to stratify the risk of malignancy by patient risk factors, calcification distribution, and stability. RESULTS: Calcifications were retrieved from 150 biopsies; 30 (20%) proved malignant and included 27 ductal carcinomas in situ and three low-grade invasive and intraductal carcinomas (2-5 mm). Another 30 (20%) yielded high-risk lesions, including 21 atypical ductal hyperplasia, eight atypical lobular hyperplasia, and one lobular carcinoma in situ. In 150 lesions, stereotactic biopsy was performed on 113 and aborted in 10. Calcifications were retrieved from all 113 stereotactic biopsies. Of those with calcification retrieval, there were three histologic underestimates (accuracy, 97%). Stereotactic biopsy spared a surgical procedure in 57 (46%) of 123 patients. Needle localization was required for 23 (15%) of 150 patients due to poor conspicuity. Five (45%) of 11 biopsies performed in women with ipsilateral breast cancer showed malignancy (P = .025). When multiple lesions of amorphous calcifications were present in one breast, sampling of one reliably predicted the outcome of others. CONCLUSION: We found a substantial rate of ductal carcinoma in situ and high-risk lesions associated with amorphous calcifications. Stereotactic biopsy can be successfully performed for the majority of subtle amorphous calcifications; however, only a minority were spared a surgical procedure.     

US of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Little is known about the ultrasonographic (US) features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast because this entity usually manifests as pure mammographic calcifications and is rarely evaluated with US. US findings were recorded in 70 patients with DCIS and then analyzed and correlated with mammographic and histologic findings. A microlobulated mass with mild hypoechogenicity, ductal extension, and normal acoustic transmission was the most common US finding in DCIS. Spiculated margins, marked hypoechogenicity, a thick echogenic rim, and posterior acoustic shadowing at US often suggested the presence of invasion. US performed with a 10-13-MHz transducer and optimal technique can be used as a complement to mammography in detecting and evaluating DCIS of the breast, as it demonstrates breast lesions associated with malignant microcalcifications in most cases. The main benefit of identifying a US abnormality in women with mammographically detected DCIS is to allow the use of US to guide interventional procedures (eg, needle biopsy, needle localization). US may also be helpful in detecting DCIS without calcifications and in evaluating disease extent in women with dense breasts. Nevertheless, further research is needed to delineate the role of US in the evaluation of patients with DCIS.     

Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations

We retrospectively analysed mammographies of 909 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (1980-1999) and compared our results to those of literature. Microcalcifications were present in 75% of the cases, and soft-tissue abnormalities in 27% cases with association with calcifications in 14% of cases. Palpable masses were found in 12% of the cases and nipple discharge was present in 12% of the cases. The radiographic-pathologic correlation allowed to suspect the DCIS "aggressiveness" on radiologic signs. Granular, linear, branching and/or galactophoric topography of the microcalcifications were correlated with necrosis, grade 3, comedocarcinoma type. A number of microcalcifications higher than 20 was correlated with necrosis and grade 3. Mammographic size was correlated to histologic size. Masses were correlated with grade 1. A diagnosis strategy can be proposed with a multidisciplinar approach.