Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors

The harvesting of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulation instead of bone marrow in healthy donors has become increasingly popular. Donors, given the choice between bone marrow and PBPC donation, often prefer cytapheresis because of the easier access, no necessity for general anesthesia, and no multiple bone marrow punctures. In addition, accelerated engraftment and immunomodulation by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized PBPCs are advantageous for the recipient. However, because of donor inconvenience and poor mobilization, there is a need to develop improved procedures. Aspects such as durability of hematopoietic engraftment, characterization of the earliest stem cell, and composition of PBPCs are not yet well defined, and international donor registration and follow-up must be considered when evaluating long-term safety profiles in healthy donors. This review concentrates on the most significant developments on mobilization of PBPCs published during the past year.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by chemotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for hematologic support after high-dose intensification for breast cancer.

High-dose therapy with autologous marrow support results in durable complete remissions in selected patients with relapsed lymphoma and leukemia who cannot be cured with conventional dose therapy. However, substantial morbidity and mortality result from the 3- to 6-week period of marrow aplasia until the reinfused marrow recovers adequate hematopoietic function. Hematopoietic growth factors, particularly used after chemotherapy, can increase the number of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) present in systemic circulation. The reinfusion of PBPCs with marrow has recently been reported to reduce the time to recovery of adequate marrow function. This study was designed to determine whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-mobilized PBPCs alone (without marrow) would result in rapid and reliable hematopoietic reconstitution. Sixteen patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with four cycles of doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM induction). Patients responding after the first two cycles were administered GM-CSF after the third and fourth cycles to recruit PBPCs for collection by two leukapheresis per cycle. These PBPCs were reinfused as the sole source of hematopoietic support after high doses of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin. No marrow or hematopoietic cytokines were used after progenitor cell reinfusion. Granulocytes greater than or equal to 500/microL was observed on a median of day 14 (range, 8 to 57). Transfusion independence of platelets greater than or equal to 20,000/microL occurred on a median day of 12 (range, 8 to 134). However, three patients required the use of a reserve marrow for slow platelet engraftment. In retrospect, these patients were characterized by poor baseline bone marrow cellularity and poor platelet recovery after AFM induction therapy. When compared with 29 historical control patients who had received the same high-dose intensification chemotherapy using autologous marrow support, time to engraftment, antibiotic days, transfusion requirements, and lengths of hospital stay were all significantly improved for the patients receiving PBPCs. Thus, autologous PBPCs can be efficiently collected during mobilization by chemotherapy and GM-CSF and are an attractive alternative to marrow for hematopoietic support after high-dose therapy. The enhanced speed of recovery may reduce the morbidity, mortality, and cost of high-dose treatment. Furthermore, PBPC support may enhance the effectiveness of high-dose therapy by facilitating multiple courses of therapy.     

Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells following high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with multiple myeloma

We treated 103 multiple myeloma (MM) patients with 7 g/m² cyclophosphamide (Cy) followed by 300 μg G-CSF/d to harvest peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). PBPC autografts containing > 2.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells per kg body weight were obtained at the first attempt from 90/100 evaluable patients. The most significant factor predicting impairment of PBPC collection was the duration of previous melphalan treatment ( P  < 0.0001). In multivariate discriminate analysis, treatment with melphalan during the most recent chemotherapy cycles prior to mobilization ( P  = 0.0727) and previous radiotherapy ( P  = 0.0628) had a marginally significant negative influence on the efficacy of PBPC collection. We found no reduced functional capacity of CD34⁺ cells to restore haemopoiesis after myeloablative treatment related to the duration of melphalan exposure. At the time of best response to conventional treatment, a median paraprotein reduction of 21% was achieved following high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy). Two heavily pretreated patients died and one patient developed pulmonary toxicity W.H.O. grade IV following HD-Cy. Potential transplant candidates should undergo mobilization and harvesting of PBPC before melphalan-containing treatment. Combinations of haemopoietic growth factors and their dose modifications should be investigated to improve PBPC collection, to allow a dosage reduction of the mobilization chemotherapy.     

Biological properties of peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Patients transplanted with mobilized blood progenitor cells (PBPC) recover their neutrophil counts more rapidly than patients transplanted with bone marrow even when they receive the same dose/kg of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells (CFU-GM). Here we have sought a biological explanation for this phenomenon. Most CD34-positive PBPC are quiescent (<1% in S phase) when they are collected from the bloodstream of patients treated with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), but we have shown that they are able to resume proliferation rapidly in vitro by measuring the kinetics of CFU-GM production by primitive plastic-adherent (PΔ) cells. Also, PΔcells in PBPC harvests, unlike normal marrow PΔ cells, were insensitive to cell-cycle restraint imposed by contact with marrow-derived stromal cells. We found that PΔ cells in PBPC collections produce relatively more CFU-GM and relatively fewer BFU-E than PΔ cells in bone marrow, indicating that granulopoiesis might occur at the expense of erythropoiesis, but we were unable to find any differences in the kinetics of granulocytic maturation between PBPC and bone marrow. Our interpretation of these findings is that transplanted PBPC rapidly enter the cell cycle and contact with stromal cells in the marrow does not reduce the proportion of progenitors participating in neutrophil production. Consequently, neutrophil recovery after PBPC infusion is more rapid than neutrophil recovery after marrow infusion. Granulopoiesis at the expense of erythropoiesis may also contribute to this effect.     

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy

Two hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors, granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), have been shown to accelerate leukocyte and neutrophil recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow (BM) support. Despite their use, a prolonged period of absolute leukopenia persists during which infections and other complications of transplantation occur. We collected large numbers of peripheral blood (PB) progenitors after CSF administration using either G-CSF or GM-CSF and tested their ability to affect hematopoietic reconstitution and resource utilization in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. Patients with breast cancer or melanoma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support were studied in sequential nonrandomized trials. After identical high-dose chemotherapy, patients received either BM alone, with no CSF; BM with either G-CSF or GM-CSF; or BM with G-CSF or GM-CSF and G-CSF or GM-CSF primed peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Hematopoietic reconstitution, as well as resource utilization, was monitored in these patients. The use of CSF- primed PBPC led to a highly significant reduction in the duration of leukopenia with a white blood cell (WBC) count under 100 and 200 cells/mL, and neutrophil count under 100 and 200 cells/mL with both GM- and G-CSF primed PB progenitor cells, compared with the use of the CSF with BM or with historical controls using BM alone. In addition, the use of CSF-primed PBPC resulted in a significant reduction in median number of antibiotics used, days in the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, and hospital resources used. Patients receiving G-CSF primed PBPC also experienced a reduction in the median number of days in the hospital, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, platelet transfusions, days on antibiotics, and discounted hospital charges. Phenotypic analysis of the CSF-primed PBPC indicated the presence of cells bearing antigens associated with both early and late hematopoietic progenitor cells. The use of CSF-primed PBPC can significantly improve hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. In addition, the use of G-CSF-primed PBPC was associated with a significant reduction in hospital resource utilization, and a reduction in hospital charges.     

Comparison between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation because of the technical advantage and the shorter time to engraftment. Mobilization of CD34+ into the peripheral blood can be achieved by the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), or both, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. G-CSF and GM-CSF differ somewhat in the number and composition of PBSCs and effector cells mobilized to the peripheral blood. The purpose of this review is to give a recent update on the type and immunologic properties of CD34+ cells and CD34+ cell subsets mobilized by G-CSF or GM-CSF with emphasis on (1) relative efficacy of CD34+ cell mobilization; (2) relative toxicities of G-CSF and GM-CSF as mobilizing agents; (3) mobilization of dendritic cells and their subsets; (4) delineation of the role of adhesion molecules, CXC receptor 4, and stromal cell-derived factor-1 signaling pathway in the release of CD34+ cell to the peripheral blood after treatment with G-CSF or GM-CSF.     

Basal CD34(+) cell count predicts peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and collection in healthy donors after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

We analyzed factors predicting CD34(+) cell mobilization and collection after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration in 47 healthy donors. Basal CD34(+) cell count and sex were the two variables that significantly predicted a better CD34(+) cell mobilization, and greater age was the only variable associated with lower CD34+ cell yields.     

High-dose therapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: effects of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on the autograft

Between June 1989 and June 1992, 144 patients participated in sequential clinical trials using peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBC) as their sole source of hematopoietic rescue following high-dose chemotherapy. All patients had received prior extensive combination chemotherapy and had marrow defects that precluded autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). PBC were collected according to a single apheresis protocol. The initial 86 patients (group 1) had PBC collected without mobilization. Beginning in April 1991, PBC were mobilized solely with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rHuGM-CSF). Thirty-four patients (group 2) received rHuGM-CSF at a dose of 125 micrograms/m2/d by continuous intravenous infusion, and 24 patients (group 3) received rHuGM-CSF at a dose of 250 micrograms/m2/d by continuous intravenous infusion. Patients underwent at least six aphereses and had a minimum of 6.5 x 10(8) mononuclear cells (MNC)/kg collected. Cytokines were not routinely administered immediately after transplantation. A median of nine aphereses were required to collect PBC in group 1 and seven aphereses for groups 2 and 3 (P = .03). The time required to recover 0.5 x 10(9)/L granulocytes after transplant was significantly shorter (P = .0004) for the mobilized groups; the median time to recovery was 26 days for group 1, 23 days for group 2, and 18 days for group 3. Transplantation of PBC mobilized with rHuGM-CSF resulted in a shorter time to platelet (P = .04) and red blood cell (P = .01) transfusion independence. Mobilization with rHuGM-CSF alone resulted in efficient collection of PBC, that provided rapid and sustained restoration of hematopoietic function following high-dose chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBC with rHuGM-CSF alone is an effective method for patients who have received prior chemotherapy and have bone marrow abnormalities.     

Comparative study of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma after single-dose cyclophosphamide combined with rhGM-CSF or rhG-CSF

Summary. Patients suffering from high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) were randomized to receive single high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by either rhGM-CSF or rhG-CSF in order to harvest circulating peripheral blood progenitor cells. The safety of the procedure, the mobilization kinetics, the relative efficacy of rhGM-CSF and rhG-CSF to mobilize progenitor cells and their relative toxicity were studied. Special attention was paid to the antigenic profile of CD34⁺ progenitor cells.
Group I patients (n=ll) were treated with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m² i.v. followed by rhGM-CSF at 10 /ig/kg/d by subcutaneous administration. Group II (n=ll) patients received rhG-CSF s.c. at 10/zg/kg/d after the same dose cyclophosphamide. Both mobilization regimens appeared to be equally effective. No significant differences in absolute numbers of circulating progenitors, determined by CD34 expression or in yields of MNC, CFU-GM, BFU-E and CD34 subsets were observed. rhGM-CSF administration resulted however in delayed haemopoietic recovery and an increased complication rate.
We conclude that rhG-CSF may be preferred because of its markedly lower toxicity and lower in-hospital costs.     

Possible role of gangliosides in the interaction of colony-stimulating factor with granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells

Our previous studies have shown that preincubation of murine bone marrow (BM) cells with cholera toxin (CT) or with its B subunit inhibited their responsiveness to colony-stimulating factor (CSF). Because ganglioside GM1 is a component of the CT receptor, the present study was undertaken to determine whether gangliosides interact with CSF and therefore might play a role in the binding sites for CSF. Preincubation of CSF with increasing concentrations of bovine-brain mixed gangliosides resulted in decreased numbers of colonies of BM-derived granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells (CFU-C) in soft agar. The inhibitory effect of the gangliosides could be reduced by increasing the concentrations of CSF. Evidence for direct binding of CSF to gangliosides was obtained by affinity chromatography of CSF on gangliosides-sepharose beads. CSF activity was retained on the beads and could be eluted with 6 M guanidine HCl. Four different individual gangliosides (GM1, GM2, GD1a, GT1b) were tested for their inhibitory effect on CSF-induced clonal growth of CFU-C. GM1 was the most effective with a 50% inhibition (I50) of clonal growth at a concentration of 15 microM. while the other three gangliosides had slight inhibitory activity (I50 at a concentration greater than 100 microM). In addition, preincubation of BM cells with rabbit anti-GM1 antibodies before addition of CSF reduced the clonal growth of CFU-C to 45%. These data indicate that GM1 interacts with CSF and suggest that gangliosides may play a role in the interaction of CSF with CFU-C and that the binding site for CSF on the surface of these cells might either consist of or contain this ganglioside.     

Differential mobilization of myeloma cells and normal hematopoietic stem cells in multiple myeloma after treatment with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic growth factors are now widely used to support myeloablative therapy of multiple myeloma and effect complete remissions in up to 50% of patients with apparent extension of event- free and overall survival. Because tumor cells are present not only in bone marrow, but also in virtually all PBSC harvests, it is conceivable that autografted myeloma cells contribute to relapse after autotransplants. In this study, the kinetics of mobilization of normal hematopoietic stem cells were compared with those of myeloma cells present in PBSC harvests of 12 patients after high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration. CD34+ and CD34+Lin-Thy+ stem cell contents were measured by multiparameter flow cytometry, and myeloma cells were quantitated by immunostaining for the relevant Ig light chain and by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the myeloma-specific CDRIII sequence. Results indicated marked heterogeneity in the percentages of mobilized stem cells among different patients (0.1% to 22.2% for CD34+ cells and 0.1% to 7.5% for CD34+Lin-Thy+ cells, respectively). The highest proportions of hematopoietic progenitor cells were observed early during apheresis, with 9 of 12 patients mobilizing adequate amounts of CD34+ cells for 2 autotransplants (> 4 x 10(6)/kg) within the first 2 days, whereas peak levels (percent and absolute numbers) of myeloma cells were present on days 5 and 6 (0.5% to 22.0%). During the last days of collection, mobilized tumor cells exhibited more frequently high labeling index values (1% to 10%; median, 4.4%) and an immature phenotype (CD19+). The differential mobilization observed between normal hematopoietic stem cells and myeloma cells can be exploited to reduce tumor cell contamination in PBSC harvests.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone at 12 microg/kg twice a day for 4 days for peripheral blood progenitor cell priming in pediatric patients

In children, the optimal mobilization schedule for harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) is an issue of continuous research. We have studied a schedule based on high and daily divided doses of G-CSF (12 microg/kg body weight twice daily) for 4 days for PBPC priming. Toxicity related to G-CSF was observed in 13 patients (23%), mainly mild bone pain and myalgia. The median CD34(+)cell number collected was 4.4 (0.4-35 x 10(6)/kg body weight), with 46 patients achieving 2 x 10(6)/kg body weight (83.6%) after a single large volume leukapheresis. In conclusion, this mobilization schedule allows safe and efficient collection of the minimum target CD34(+) cell dose in most pediatric patients by only one procedure.     

Noncycling state of peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and other cytokines

Incubation with high doses of tritiated thymidine in vitro was used to determine the percent of progenitor cells in the S phase of the cell cycle. Peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), and spleen populations from mice injected with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 5 micrograms/day for 5 days and BM cells from uninjected littermates were assayed. Although the percentage of progenitor cells in S phase in the marrow (47% +/- 5%) and spleen (52% +/- 9%) was increased significantly in G-CSF-treated mice, only a small proportion of PB progenitor cells (PBPC) were in S phase (7% +/- 4%). In normal human subjects injected with G-CSF at 5 or 10 micrograms/kg/d, the proportions of PB myeloid (-1 +/- 4%) and erythroid (0% +/- 8%) progenitor cells in S phase were very low compared with the proportion of myeloid progenitor cells in S phase in normal BM (34% +/- 10%). Similarly, the large majority of steady-state PBPC and PBPC mobilized by interleukin-3 in combination with either granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or G-CSF were also found not to be in S phase. Experiments indicated that the low percentages of PBPC in S phase were not ascribable either to inhibitory elements in the blood or to reduced responsiveness to growth factors.     

Influence of mobilized peripheral blood cells on the hematopoietic recovery by autologous marrow and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin.

Peripheral blood cells (PBC) can hasten hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. To determine if PBC apheresed after mobilization further enhance hematopoietic recovery over that achieved with autologous bone marrow (ABM) and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF), 14 patients with metastatic solid tumors were supported by ABM and rhGM-CSF during the first course of high doses of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (CVP) and 11 of these 14 patients by mobilized PBC with ABM and rhGM-CSF during the second CVP. Each patient served as his or her own control. Identical doses of CVP were administered in both courses: cyclophosphamide 5.25 g/m2, etoposide 1,200 mg/m2, and cisplatin 165 to 180 mg/m2. PBC were collected on day 10 after mobilization with cyclophosphamide (3 g/m2) intravenously (IV) on day 1, doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) as a continuous IV infusion over 48 hours starting day 2, and rhGM-CSF as a daily 4-hour IV infusion starting day 4 at 0.6 mg/m2 for 14 days. Comparing recovery in the 11 patients to receive two cycles of therapy, the median days to an absolute neutrophil count of 0.1 x 10(9)/L and 0.5 x 10(9)/L were not statistically significant between the two courses; neither was there a difference in the incidence of fever and bacteremia. The median number of days to platelet count of 0.02 x 10(12)/L unmaintained by platelet transfusion was 20 from marrow infusion for course 1 and 16 for course 2 (P = .059). The median number of days to a platelet count of 0.05 x 10(12)/L was significantly shortened: 24 and 19 days for courses 1 and 2, respectively (P = .045). Patients who received PBC required fewer number of platelet transfusions. Extramedullary toxicities were not different between the groups. Our finding of enhanced early recovery of platelets and reduced platelet transfusion requirement is in concordance with other studies.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by sequential administration of interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor following polychemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin.

We report on the requirements that have to be met to combine a standard-dose chemotherapy regimen with broad antitumor activity with the mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells. Thirty-two cancer patients were given a 1-day course of chemotherapy consisting of etoposide (VP16), ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP; n = 46 cycles), followed by the combined sequential administration of recombinant human interleukin-3 (rhIL-3) and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF). Control patients received GM-CSF alone or were treated without cytokines. Maximum numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were recruited on day 13 to 17 after chemotherapy, with a median of 418 CD34+ cells/microL blood (range, 106 to 1,841) in IL-3/GM-CSF-treated patients, 426 CD34+/microL (range, 191 to 1,380) in GM-CSF-treated patients, and 46 CD34+/microL (range, 15 to 148) in patients treated without cytokines. In parallel, there was an increase in myeloid (10,490 colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage [CFU-GM]/mL blood; range, 1,000 to 23,400), as well as erythroid (10,660 burst-forming unit-erythroid [BFU-E]/mL blood; range, 3,870 to 24,300) and multipotential (840 CFU-granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte, megakaryocyte [GEMM]/mL blood; range, 160 to 2,070) progenitor cells in IL-3 plus GM-CSF-treated patients. In GM-CSF-treated patients, significantly less precursor cells of all lineages were mobilized, particularly multipotential progenitors (400 CFU-GEMM/mL blood; range, 200 to 2,150). Only small numbers of CD34+ cells and clonogenic progenitor cells could be recruited in intensively pretreated patients. Our data document that after standard-dose chemotherapy-induced bone marrow hypoplasia, IL-3 plus GM-CSF can be used to recruit PBPC, which might shorten the hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy in chemosensitive lymphomas or solid tumors.     

大剂量环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子动员多发性骨髓瘤造血干细胞的价值研究

目的研究大剂量环磷酰胺(HD-CTX)联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)造血干细胞动员中的临床疗效和安全性。方法选择2006年6月至2010年9月中山大学附属第一医院血液科36例MM患者,全部患者接受HD-CTX联合G-CSF动员,CTX 3~5 g/m2,第1天,G-CSF300μg/d第2天起直到干细胞采集结束。结果 35例(97.2%)动员成功,其中31例第一次动员即成功,4例第二次动员成功。干细胞采集的中位时间为第11(9~13)天,22例(62.9%)患者采集1次,13例(37.1%)患者采集2次。采集的单个核细胞(MNC)数为(4.49±1.71)×108/kg,CD34+细胞数为(3.21±1.87)×106/kg。7例疗效在动员后得到进一步提高。动员的非血液系统副反应包括恶心、呕吐11例(26.8%)、腹痛腹泻5例(12.2%)、发热7例(17.1%)、骨痛4例(9.8%)等。只有1例因感染影响干细胞采集。结论 HD-CTX联合G-CSF是MM造血干细胞动员的安全有效的方法。