Long-term angiographic follow-up after successful repeat balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND: Coronary stent implantation is associated with improved angiographic short-term and mid-term clinical outcome. However, restenosis rate still remains between 20 and 30%. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study, performed as a prospective angiographic follow-up to detect restenosis, was to evaluate the immediate and the 6-month angiographic results of repeat balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. METHODS: From April 1996 to September 1997, 335 stenting procedures performed in 327 patients underwent prospectively 6-month control angiography. Of the 96 lesions that showed in-stent restenosis (> 50% diameter stenosis) (29%), 72 underwent balloon angioplasty. RESULTS: The primary success rate was 100%. Follow-up angiogram at a mean of 6.9 +/- 2.4 months was obtained in 54 patients. Recurrent restenosis was observed in 24 of the 55 stents (44%). Repeat intervention for diffuse and body location in-stent restenosis before repeat intervention was associated with significantly higher rates of recurrent restenosis (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Of the 19 patients who underwent further balloon angioplasty (100% success rate), coronary angiography was performed in 18 (95%) at a mean of 8.2 +/- 2.0 months and showed recurrent restenosis in 12 patients (67%). Further repeat intervention for diffuse and severe in-stent restenosis before the second repeat intervention was associated with significantly higher rates of further recurrent restenosis (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty can be safely, successfully, and repeatedly performed after stent restenosis, it carries a progressively high recurrence of angiographic restenosis rate during repeat 6-month follow-ups. The subgroup of patients with diffuse, severe, and/or body location in-stent restenosis proved to be at higher risk of recurrent restenosis.     

Three-year follow-up after rotational atherectomy for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis: predictors of major adverse cardiac events.

Restenosis remains the major limitation of coronary stent implantation, especially in diffuse forms of in-stent restenosis. In this study, rotablation (RA) with adjunct angioplasty of in-stent restenosis was performed in 84 patients. Clinical follow-up and control angiography were obtained 6-month postprocedure. The rate of recurrent restenosis after rotablation for in-stent restenosis at 6-month angiographic follow-up was 45%, resulting in a rate of major adverse cardiac events of 35%. At 3-year follow-up, the cumulative event-free survival rate was 57% for the entire population. The only predictor of MACE at 3-year clinical follow-up by multivariate logistic regression analysis was in-stent lesion length. RA for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis is thereby characterized by high procedural success rates and recurrent angiographic restenosis in 45% of patients with diffuse lesions. Major adverse cardiac events occur most likely within the first 6 months postprocedure. Three years after rotablation of in-stent restenosis, 43% of patients had experienced at least one major adverse cardiac event. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:334-340.     

Standalone cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of stent-related restenosis: acute results and 3- to 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rates.

Despite excellent acute reperfusion results, 20%-30% of patients who undergo coronary stent implantation will develop angiographic restenosis and may require same additional treatments. Cutting Balloon angioplasty (CBA) causes less histological damage outside of the incised area than a regular balloon. However, regular plain old balloon angioplasty is sometimes required before CBA, as is adjunctive stenting and adjunctive angioplasty. These adjunctive strategies may negate the advantages of CBA. There is little data available on CBA as a standalone therapy for stent-related restenosis (SRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute and 3- to 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rates following standalone CBA in a patient population treated for SRS and in whom optimal acute results were obtained. In this study, 40 patients with SRS (54 lesions) underwent standalone CBA with optimal acute results. For all lesions, coronary angiography was conducted before and after a standalone CBA procedure for SRS and systematically during 3-6 months to assess recurrent angiographic restenosis rates in the study population. In the study lesions, SRS was either diffuse disease (> 15 mm; 52%) or focal type (48%). Cutting Balloon diameter was 3.20 +/- 0.44 mm and maximal inflation pressure 8.7 +/- 1.2 atm. Ratio of Cutting Balloon diameter to restenotic stent diameter was 0.996 +/- 0.487. Multiple inflations (6 +/- 3 times) were performed. Number of used Cutting Balloon was 1.02 +/- 0.14. Complications were as follows; one non-Q-wave MI (1.9%); 0 death (0%), and 17 repeat target lesion revascularizations (TLRs; 32%). Follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) was not attained for one patient. The angiographic recurrent restenosis rate was 34%, with a higher rate observed when the SRS was diffuse type, 50% vs. 16% for focal-type SRS (P < 0.01). The recurrent restenosis rate for smaller vessels (vessel diameter < or = 3.0 mm) was the same as for larger ones. At follow-up CAG, diffuse-type recurrent restenosis (56%) presented nearly as frequently as that presenting in the original SRS lesions (52%). But four diffuse-type SRS (29%) changed into focal-type recurrent stenosis. In this study, standalone CBA for SRS with optimal acute results was associated with an angiographic restenosis rate of 34%. Diffuse-type disease had a higher recurrent restenosis rate. When CBA achieves acute optimal results, adjunctive stenting or adjunctive PTCA are not always necessary, particularly when the SRS is focal. As a result of CBA, some diffuse-type SRS may change into focal-type recurrent stenosis by the time of the next intervention.     

Role of vessel size as a predictor for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus

Intracoronary stents have been shown to reduce the rate of restenosis when compared with balloon angioplasty, but in-stent restenosis continues to be an important clinical problem. It was therefore the aim of this registry to identify procedural and angiographic predictors for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. We analyzed 368 patients with 421 lesions who underwent coronary stent implantation between January 1998 and February 2000. Indications for the placement of a coronary stent were severe dissections (37%), suboptimal angiographic results (38%), restenotic lesions (20%), and graft lesions (4%). Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 270 patients (73%) with 293 lesions after 6 months. Clinical and angiographic variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate models for the ability to predict the occurrence of in-stent restenosis, defined as a diameter stenosis >50%. In-stent restenosis was angiographically documented in 67 patients and 68 lesions (23%). Under all tested variables the reference luminal diameter before stent implantation (p = 0.006) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.023) were identified as independent predictors for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. The comparison of diabetic and nondiabetic patients according to vessel size revealed a 2 times higher rate of in-stent restenosis in small vessels (44% vs 23%, p = 0.002), whereas in vessels >3.0 mm the rate of in-stent restenosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups. In this registry, the clinical variable diabetes and the procedural variable reference vessel size were independent predictors for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. In these patients, the rate of in-stent restenosis was as high as 45%.     

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with high speed rotational atherectomy and IVUS guidance in small <3.0 mm vessels

The management of in-stent restenosis remains a subject for debate because no one revascularization option is considered the most appropriate. Since a high restenosis rate still occurs after repeat balloon angioplasty, new techniques are attempted in order to reduce this rate. A combination of high speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty is likely to achieve good results. In small (<3.0 mm diameter) vessels, the risk of interaction between the burr and the stent increases. We thus used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in the treatment of in-stent restenosis with HSRA in small <3.0 mm small diameter vessels. Nine patients with in-stent restenosis in small vessels were referred for repeat angioplasty. Initial IVUS examination was used to assess the minimal stent struts diameter and to guide the burr size selection. A combination of HSRA and additional balloon angioplasty was performed under IVUS and angiographic guidance. Mean angiographic reference diameter was 2.25 ± 0.35 mm and mean stent struts diameter was 2.38 ± 0.20 mm. Burr size was selected ∼0.5 mm smaller than stent struts diameter and ranged from 1.75 to 2.5 mm, with a 0.88 ± 0.12 mean burr/artery ratio (range 0.71, 1.08). In two patients, a second larger burr was used. In 4/9 patients, the burr size chosen under IVUS guidance was close to angiographic MLD at stent implantation and thus larger than what would be used without IVUS guidance. Additional balloon angioplasty was decided in all cases, using a 1.1 ± 0.15 balloon/artery ratio. No complication occurred. Mean relative gain in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was 94 ± 90% after HSRA and 54 ± 34% after balloon angioplasty (total relative gain 180 ± 100%). IVUS guidance allowed safe management of in-stent restenosis in small vessels using combination of HSRA and balloon angioplasty. Long-term follow-up and comparison with other techniques are necessary to assess whether this technique should be used routinely. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 44:77–82, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Clinical and angiographic follow-up after balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting for coronary in-stent restenosis.

The objective of this study was to assess the angiographic and clinical outcome of patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated with balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting. The study included 375 consecutive patients with in-stent restenosis managed with balloon angioplasty alone or combined with stenting. Clinical events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up period and quantitative analysis was performed on 6-month angiographic data. Of the 373 patients (451 lesions) with a successful procedure, 273 were treated with angioplasty alone and 100 with additional stenting. Target lesion revascularization was required in 23.7% of the patients: 20.7% in patients with angioplasty and 31.0% in patients with stenting. Angiographic restenosis rate was 38.9%: 35.8% in the angioplasty group and 47.7% in the stent group. Stenting in small vessels was associated with a much higher restenosis rate than in larger vessels (65.6% vs. 37.5%, respectively; P = 0.01). Thus, repeat balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting for in-stent restenosis is a safe treatment strategy associated with a relatively favorable long-term outcome. However, the long-term results might be improved if additional stenting is avoided especially in small vessels. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:151-156, 1999.     

Re-angioplasty of in-stent restenosis versus balloon restenoses--a matched pair comparison

BACKGROUND: Despite different biological mechanisms involved in the restenotic process of in-stent restenosis and restenosis after balloon angioplasty alone, the occurrence of a second restenosis has been reported in the same range. There are no data available comparing the outcome after re-angioplasty of such lesions. We analyzed in a matched pair comparison the clinical outcome and angiographic long-term result of patients with balloon angioplasty of a first in-stent restenosis versus patients with balloon re-angioplasty of a first balloon restenosis. METHODS: Both groups consisted of 74 lesions matched by treated vessel, lesion location differentiated in proximal and non-proximal, and angiographic appearance of coronary artery disease differentiated in singular stenosis, diffuse or mixed pattern. Clinical follow-up was 100%. Angiographic follow-up was 78.4% after median 174 days. RESULTS: Angiographic restenosis rate in matched pairs of patients (n=46/74) was significantly higher in the balloon restenosis group (41.3%, n=19/46) compared to the in-stent restenosis group (21.7%, n=10/46, p<0.042). There was no death or myocardial infarction. After clinical follow-up, target lesion revascularization rate was significantly lower in the in-stent restenosis group compared to the balloon restenosis group (12.1%, n=9/74 versus 27.0%, n=20/74; difference between groups 14.9%, 95% confidence interval 2.0-27.3%, p<0.023). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed as predictors for a second restenosis unstable angina pectoris, non-proximal lesion, restenosis after balloon angioplasty and the occurrence of the first restenosis within 90 days after initial intervention. CONCLUSION: Clinical and angiographic outcome after balloon angioplasty of a first in-stent restenosis was significantly better compared with balloon re-angioplasty of a first balloon restenosis.     

Six-month outcome after excimer laser coronary angioplasty for diffuse in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries

This study evaluated the intermediate-term follow-up after excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and adjunctive percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis (lesion length >10 mm). Clinical and angiographic follow-up were performed at 6 months. Quantitative coronary angiography performed at 3 stages-during stent implantation, before and after ELCA + PTCA, and at follow-up-included measurements of the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) and percent diameter stenosis (DS). Sixteen consecutive patients were included. The (median + range) stent length was 36 mm (range 15 to 105), with a restenotic lesion length of 32 mm (range 10 to 90). After ELCA + PTCA, the MLD increased from 0.60 +/- 0.41 to 2.28 +/- 0.50 mm, whereas the DS decreased from 76 +/- 16% to 22 +/- 8%. Despite adjunctive high-pressure PTCA, the MLD after ELCA + PTCA remained smaller than the MLD after initial stent implantation, (2.28 +/- 0. 50 mm vs 2.67 +/- 0.32 mm, p = 0.014). Adverse events included ELCA-related acute coronary occlusion in 4 patients and a per-procedural intracerebral hematoma in 1. At 6 months, there was recurrence of angina in all patients. Angiographic follow-up was completed in 13 patients (87%), showing a reocclusion in 6 (46%), a >50% DS in 6 (MLD 1.03 +/- 0.87 mm, DS 68 +/- 24%), and a distal de novo lesion in 1. Despite satisfactory acute angiographic results, the recurrence of significant restenosis in all patients suggests that ELCA + PTCA is not a suitable stand-alone therapy for diffuse in-stent restenosis of long stented segments.     

Comparison of sirolimus versus paclitaxel eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis

In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) inside bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents reduce the recurrence of restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty. However, few data are available about this therapeutic modality in the case of diffuse restenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and mid-term outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in diffuse ISR and determine the predictors of clinical and angiographic restenosis recurrence. A series of 161 consecutive patients with 194 diffuse ISR lesions (>10 mm) treated with drug-eluting stent implantation were evaluated. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as death, myocardial infarction, and the need for target lesion revascularization. During a mean follow-up of 8.2 +/- 3.4 months, the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 19% in the SES group and 24% in the PES group (p = 0.56). Angiographic follow-up was performed in 80% of the lesions. The overall restenosis rate was 22% and was not significantly different between lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting (20%) or paclitaxel-eluting (25%, p = 0.55) stents. The incidence of restenosis was higher in diabetics (32%) than in nondiabetics (16%, odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.5, p = 0.02). By multivariate analysis, diabetes was confirmed to be the only independent predictor of recurrent restenosis (odds ratio 3.53, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 9.02, p = 0.008). In conclusion, drug-eluting stent implantation for diffuse ISR is associated with acceptable clinical and angiographic results. The association of diffuse restenosis and diabetes mellitus is an unfavorable condition leading to a high risk of recurrence.     

Management of distal/bifurcation left main restenosis after drug eluting stents implantation: Single center experience

ObjectivesRestenosis after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation in the distal/bifurcation left main (DBLM) remains challenging to manage. The aim of this study was to assess the in-stent restenosis (ISR) after DES implantation in DLM and to evaluate current management strategy.MethodsThe medical records of patients referred for LM distal/bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) from the same Cardiology Unit in the January 2007 to December 2012 period were reviewed for PCI technique, stent type, restenosis type, restenosis treatment and management (CABG, balloon angioplasty only, alternative DES implant, drug eluting balloon angioplasty).ResultsFourteen patients (5 females, mean age 75.1 ± 8.3 years) out of 89 (15.7%) having undergone a percutaneous coronary interventions on DBLM with DES, developed restenosis (everolimus stents in 10 patients, zotarolimus stents in 4 patients). Technique used at the first implant included stenting of the main branch in 4 patients, culottes stenting in 6 patients and T-stent in 4 patients. The mean time elapsed from the first angioplasty and ISR intervention was 7.6 ± 3.6 months. Restenosis treatments included: implantation of a different DES (in 3 patients), implantation of a bare-metal stent (in 2 patients), simple balloon angioplasty (in 4 patients), and drug-eluting balloon (5 patients). At 6-month angiographic control second restenosis rate was 14.2%. After a mean follow-up of 38.5 ± 24.4 months the target vessel revascularization was 14.3%: surgery was the final choice in two patients due to recurrent restenosis. Incidence of major adverse cardiac event was 28.5%.ConclusionsThe occurrence of restenosis after DBLM following DES implantation is not frequent but remains difficult to manage. In our small anecdotal series, all the different strategies including implantation of different DES, balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stent implantation and drug-eluting balloon angioplasty appeared equally effective in maintaining arterial patency.     

经皮切割球囊成形术治疗支架内再狭窄的研究

目的　研究切割球囊成形术对治疗支架内再狭窄的即刻和 6个月内随访效果。方法　 6 9例支架内再狭窄患者随机分配到切割球囊组 (38例 )和普通球囊治疗组 (31例 )。球囊扩张前及扩张后即刻在定量冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉内超声下 ,测定相关参数。观察随访 6个月内临床改善及冠状动脉造影结果。研究终点包括出现心肌梗死 ,需要冠状动脉搭桥或再介入治疗。结果　两组的手术成功率均为 10 0 %。切割球囊组 1例患者扩张后在支架的远端出现夹层。平均随访 (6 .7± 2 .3)个月。切割球囊组于术后 3和 6个月时的再狭窄率显著低于普通球囊组(15 %∶38%及 18%∶4 2 % ,P <0 .0 0 1)。扩张后即刻血管直径获得值在切割球囊组和普通球囊组分别为 (1.72±0 .5 2 )mm和 (1.15± 0 .5 4 )mm ,随访 3个月及随访终点时切割球囊组的血管直径晚期丢失分别为 (0 .2 6± 0 .0 5 )mm(3个月 )及 (0 .38± 0 .0 6 )mm ,同时的普通球囊组丢失值分别为 (0 .78± 0 .19)mm(3个月 )及 (0 .89± 0 .16 )mm。结论　切割球囊成形术治疗老年冠心病患者支架内狭窄效果可靠 ,安全 ,容易操作 ,再狭窄率低     

支架内再狭窄的介入治疗

目的介绍支架内再狭窄的处理经验.方法回顾分析156例支架内再狭窄患者经PTCA或支架植入术治疗的即刻和术后随访结果.支架内再狭窄治疗前后行冠脉造影,并于术后5.7±3.8个月复查冠脉造影.结果 156例支架内再狭窄患者PTCA或支架术治疗均获成功,其中134例(144支血管)行PTCA治疗,占86.7%;22例(22支血管)行再次支架置入术,占13.3%.156例经再次PTCA或支架术治疗后随访平均6个月的再狭窄率为24.3%.40处弥漫性支架内再狭窄经PTCA处理后18处(45%)再次再狭窄,而96处局限性支架内再狭窄中有17处再次再狭窄(18%),弥漫性支架内再狭窄经PTCA治疗后,再次再狭窄率明显高于局限性支架内再狭窄(P<0.01).支架内狭窄严重程度(>75%)也是影响PTCA疗效的主要因素.结论对于大多数支架内再狭窄(70%)采用PTCA治疗安全有效,术后再狭窄率与首次支架置入术相似.     

Stenting of Nonacute Total Coronary Occlusions: Predictors of Late Angiographic Outcome

Objectives. This study was designed to determine and assess factors predictive of the intermediate-term outcome of stenting of nonacute total coronary occlusions.Background. Balloon angioplasty of recanalized coronary occlusions is associated with a combined restenosis/reocclusion rate of up to 65%. Adjunctive stenting holds the potential to reduce this rate significantly. However, variables affecting the late angiographic outcome of coronary stenting in the setting of a total occlusion have not been elucidated sufficiently.Methods. Coronary stenting was performed in 143 consecutive patients with a nonacute total occlusion; 120 of these patients (84%), with a total of 121 occlusions, underwent repeat angiography within 6 months and comprised the study group. High pressure stent implantation aimed to cover the site of the occlusion as well as adjacent diameter stenoses ≥70% and all possibly induced dissections. Pertinent angiographic and procedural variables obtained at the time of the intervention were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis model to assess their influence on the angiographic outcome at follow-up.Results. Mean preinterventional reference lumen diameter for the 121 vessels was 2.99 ± 0.53 mm (mean ± SD); occlusion length ranged from 4 to 44 mm (median of 7.7). After balloon angioplasty, dissections were found in 80% of patients. Lesions were covered with stents a median of 16 mm in length (range 8 to 53). The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) achieved after stenting was 2.89 ± 0.48 mm. After a median follow-up period of 4.5 months, mean MLD was assessed at 1.91 ± 0.90 mm, corresponding to a loss index of 0.34 ± 0.31. There were 27 vessels with a nonocclusive restenosis ≥50% and 8 with a reocclusion, for a combined restenosis/reocclusion rate of 29%. Factors found to adversely influence angiographic outcome were a post-stenting MLD ≤2.54 mm, a stented vessel segment length >16 mm, a balloon/vessel diameter ratio for final stent expansion ≤1.00 and the presence of a dissection after balloon angioplasty.Conclusions. Compared with previous reports on stand-alone balloon angioplasty, stenting of nonacute total coronary occlusions lowers the 6-month restenosis/reocclusion rate to ∼30%. The late procedural outcome is independently and statistically significantly influenced by the MLD after stenting, the length of the stented vessel segment, the balloon/vessel diameter ratio for final stent expansion and the incidence of dissections after balloon angioplasty.     

Therapeutic implications of in-stent restenosis located at the stent edge. Insights from the restenosis intra-stent balloon angioplasty versus elective stenting (RIBS) randomized trial.

AIMS: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) several anatomic subgroups have been identified. ISR affecting the stent edge (EDG) is a poorly characterised subgroup with undefined therapeutic implications. We sought to determine the implications of ISR affecting the stent EDG. METHODS AND RESULTS: 450 patients included in the "Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs elective Stenting" (RIBS) randomized study, were analysed. EDG ISR was predefined in the protocol and the pattern of ISR analysed in a centralized core-lab. Fifty-two patients (12%) had EDG ISR (29 stent group, 23 balloon arm). Patients with EDG ISR had less severe [minimal lumen diameter (MLD) (0.78+/-0.3 vs 0.66+/-0.3 mm, p=0.05)] and shorter lesions (lesion length 10.2+/-6 vs 13.2+/-7 mm, p=0.003). Patients with EDG ISR more frequently required crossover (12% vs 3%, p=0.006) but eventually the immediate angiographic result and the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome was similar to that found in patients without EDG ISR. Patients with EDG ISR treated in the balloon and stent arms had similar baseline characteristics. However, after intervention, the immediate angiographic result was better in the stent arm (MLD 2.79+/-0.4 vs 2.35+/-0.3 mm, p=0.001). This difference persisted at late follow-up: MLD (1.93+/-0.7 vs 1.39+/-0.7 mm, p=0.01), recurrent restenosis (20% vs 50%, p=0.03). In addition, the 1-year event-free survival was significantly better (83% vs 52%, log rank p=0.01; Cox HR 0.28, 95%CI 0.09-0.79) in the stent arm. Moreover, stent implantation was an independent predictor of freedom from target vessel revascularization (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.03-0.67, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: EDG ISR constitutes a specific subgroup with relevant therapeutic implications. In patients with EDG ISR, repeat stent implantation provides better clinical and angiographic outcome than conventional balloon angioplasty.     

Procedural results and distal embolization after saphenous vein graft stenting and angioplasty for in-stent restenosis of grafts

Saphenous vein graft (SVG) angioplasty is associated with frequent periprocedural complications due to distal embolization and a high risk of restenosis. The purpose of this single-center, retrospective study was to determine the distal embolization incidences and outcomes of stenting for SVG lesions and percutaneous angioplasty for in-stent restenosis of these SVGs. We studied 48 consecutive patients (mean age, 62 +/- 7 years, 92% men) who had prior CABG and underwent stent deployment to SVG lesions detected at our institution over a period of 4 years. Mean lesion length was 12.4 +/- 3.2 mm. The minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.7 +/- 0.3 mm to 3.2 +/- 0.4 mm after stenting. Distal embolization as no reflow/slow flow phenomenon occurred in 5 (10%) patients. Angiographic success was achieved in 98% of the patients. Procedural success was achieved in 96% of the patients. No reflow/slow flow phenomenon was observed, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndrome. During the follow-up, 11 patients (23%) had angiographic evidence of restenosis. Lesions were treated with balloon angioplasty and the minimal lumen diameter increased from 2.6 +/- 1.1 mm to 3.1 +/- 0.3 mm. The angiographic and procedural success rates were both 100%. There were no cases of "no" reflow/slow flow. Restenosis was particularly frequent in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and acute coronary syndrome. Stent implantation in patients with de novo SVG lesions can be achieved with a high rate of angiographic and procedural success. The distal embolization risk is lower during angioplasty of in-stent restenosis lesions of SVGs compared to de novo SVG lesions.     

Rotational atherectomy for in-stent restenosis: acute and long-term results of the first 100 cases

Objectives. This study evaluated the clinical safety and long-term results of rotational atherectomy (RA) followed by low-pressure balloon dilatation (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).Background. In-stent restenosis is associated with a high incidence of recurrence after interventional treatment. Because ISR is due to neointimal hyperplasia, rotational ablation may be a more effective treatment than PTCA.Methods. Between November 1995 and November 1996, 100 consecutive patients with first-time ISR were treated by RA. Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were used to analyze the acute procedural results. The incidence of repeat in-stent restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at follow-up was determined.Results. Procedural success without any major in-hospital complications was achieved in 100% of cases. Slow flow was observed in 3% and creatine kinase-MB enzyme elevation >3× normal occurred in 2%. The mean burr-to-artery ratio was 0.68 ± 0.18 and adjuvant balloon dilatation was performed at 4.2 ± 2.1 atm. Minimum luminal diameter increased from 0.86 ± 0.28 mm to 1.89 ± 0.21 mm after RA and to 2.56 ± 0.29 mm after adjunct PTCA. Quantitative IVUS analysis showed that 77% of the luminal gain occurred due to rotational ablation of the restenotic tissue and only 23% occurred after adjunct balloon dilation, and further stent expansion did not contribute to the luminal enlargement. At a mean follow-up of 13 ± 5 months, repeat in-stent restenosis occurred in 28% of patients with TVR of 26%. Univariate predictors of repeat restenosis were burr-to-artery ratio <0.6, ISR in <90 days of stenting, ostial lesion, stent for a restenotic lesion and diffuse type ISR.Conclusions. Rotational atherectomy is a safe and feasible technique for treatment of ISR and is associated with a relatively low recurrent restenosis in comparison to historical controls of balloon angioplasty.     

Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of balloon angioplasty versus repeat stenting on the early angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis. The treatment of in-stent restenosis using balloon angioplasty alone often yields excellent early results, but is associated with a high rate of late recurrence. In the SCRIPPS trial, patients with restenosis were treated either with balloon angioplasty alone or placement of additional stents to optimize angiographic results before randomization and exposure of the restenotic segment to gamma radiation or placebo. In patients undergoing repeat catheter based intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, quantitative coronary angiography was used to compare the results of balloon angioplasty alone versus repeat stenting on early lumen loss. After a mean delay time interval of 71 min, the early loss was 0.35 +/- 0.34 mm in the balloon angioplasty alone group compared to 0.01 +/- 0.34 mm in the repeat-stenting group (P = 0.004). The early loss index in the balloon angioplasty alone group (12.8 +/- 12.9%) was significantly greater than in the repeat stenting group (0.7 +/- 12.1%; P = 0.003). Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis often provides excellent immediate angiographic results, luminal diameters are significantly reduced in the early time period after balloon dilatation. Repeat stenting nearly abolishes this early luminal loss.     

A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high. METHODS: We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events. RESULTS: Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.     

Stents in total occlusion for restenosis prevention. The multicentre randomized STOP study. The Israeli Working Group for Interventional Cardiology.

AIMS: This multicentre randomized study set out to evaluate whether coronary stenting improves the results of successful balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusion. Balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusion has a high restenosis rate. Several reports have suggested that coronary stenting may decrease the likelihood of restenosis and reocclusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with total coronary artery occlusions who had an optimal PTCA result were randomized either to no further treatment or additional stent implantation. The AVE microstent was used and all patients were scheduled for a 1-, 3-, and 6-month clinical follow-up. Repeat coronary angiography to assess the rate and pattern of restenosis was performed at 6 months or earlier if clinically indicated. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 59. 3+/-10.3 years and 15 were females. Forty-eight patients were randomized to the stent arm, receiving 52 stents (lengths 18-39 mm). Stent implantation was successful in all and there were no major procedure-related complications. Sixty-nine patients (72%) were restudied after 6 months. The binary restenosis rates (50%), in the PTCA arm were 70.9% with a minimal lumen diameter of 1.01+/-0.79 mm compared to 42.1% in the stent arm with a minimal lumen diameter of 1.63+/-1.02 mm (P=0.034). Reocclusion occurred in 7.9% in the stent group compared to 16.1% in the PTCA group. Restenosis in the PTCA group was focal in 88% of patients and occurred at the point of total obstruction (within 5 mm), compared to diffuse instent restenosis, which occurred in 54% of the patients in the stent group. CONCLUSION: Coronary stenting can significantly decrease the rate of restenosis and reocclusion of total occlusions. As restenosis in the stent group was more diffuse, care should be taken to implant short stents at the site of occlusion.     

Cutting balloon for in-stent restenosis: acute and long-term results

INTRODUCTION: Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has shown a high rate of ISR (30-55%). Considering the need for both extrusion of hyperplastic intima and additional stent expansion, a cutting balloon might be more effective for the treatment of ISR. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the immediate and 8-month outcome of balloon angioplasty using the Barath Cutting Balloon in 100 consecutive patients (mean age: 60.5 +/- 10.8 years, 71% male). RESULTS: In 73 lesions (73%), a good result was reached with the cutting balloon only. In 21 lesions (21%) postdilatation and in 6 lesions (6%) predilatation with a conventional balloon was necessary. The mean inflation pressure was 8.7 +/- 2.0 (range: 6.0-18.0) atm. Before the procedure the mean minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was 0.95 +/- 0.45 mm. Quantitative coronary analysis showed a mean diameter stenosis of 65%+/- 16%. Immediately after the procedure the mean MLD was 2.42 +/- 0.54 mm with a mean diameter stenosis of 19%+/- 13%. Two patients died during the follow-up period (1 stroke, 1 nonvascular). At 8-month follow-up 26 patients (26%) reported to have anginal complaints CCS class II-IV of whom 16 (16%) needed target lesion revascularization. CONCLUSION: Treatment of ISR using the Barath Cutting Balloon can be performed safely with good immediate results and a relatively low need for repeated target lesion revascularization at 8-month follow-up.