Synergic activity, for anaerobes, of trovafloxacin with clindamycin or metronidazole: chequerboard and time-kill methods

Chequerboard titrations were used to test the activity of trovafloxacin, alone and in combination with clindamycin or metronidazole, against 156 Gram-positive or Gram-negative anaerobes, including 47 Bacteroides fragilis group, 36 Prevotella spp., 26 fusobacteria, 21 peptostreptococci and 26 clostridia. MIC50/MIC90 values (mg/L) of each drug alone against all 156 strains were: trovafloxacin, 0.5/1; clindamycin, 0.25/2; metronidazole, 1/2. Synergy (FIC indices 0. 5-2.0); no antagonism (FIC indices >4.0) was seen. In addition, synergy was tested by time-kill methodology for each of the above combinations against 12 Gram-positive or Gram-negative strains. Results indicated that synergy (defined as a >/= 2 log(10) decrease in cfu/mL at 48 h compared with the more active drug alone) was found between trovafloxacin at or below the MIC and both clindamycin and metronidazole at or below the MIC in one strain each of Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium varium, Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus and Clostridium bifermentans. Synergy between trovafloxacin (相似文献   

Comparative in vitro activity of ceftriaxone against anaerobic bacteria.

The in vitro activity of ceftriaxone was compared with those of other recently introduced beta-lactam antimicrobial agents (cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam) and with those of cefoxitin, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 227 strains of anaerobic bacteria. The data obtained in this investigation suggest that ceftriaxone, like a majority of the new beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, may be of limited value in the treatment of serious infections involving anaerobic bacteria.     

Antipneumococcal activities of cefpirome and cefotaxime, alone and in combination with vancomycin and teicoplanin, determined by checkerboard and time-kill methods.

The checkerboard titration method was used to test the synergy of cefpirome and cefotaxime with teicoplanin or vancomycin against 35 penicillin-susceptible, 34 penicillin-intermediate, and 31 penicillin-resistant pneumococci. The MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates are inhibited (MIC50s and MIC90s, respectively) of both cefpirome and cefotaxime were 0.016 and 0.06 microgram/ml, respectively, for penicillin-susceptible strains and 0.125 and 0.5 microgram/ml, respectively, for penicillin-intermediate strains. The MIC50s and MIC90s of cefotaxime for penicillin-resistant strains were 1.0 and 2.0 micrograms/ml, respectively, and those of cefpirome were 0.5 and 1.0 microgram/ml, respectively. All pneumococci were inhibited by cefpirome at MICs of < or = 1.0 microgram/ml. The MIC50s and MIC90s of vancomycin and teicoplanin (0.25 and 0.25 microgram/ml and 0.03 and 0.03 microgram/ml, respectively) did not differ for the three groups. Checkerboard synergy studies showed that cefpirome and vancomycin showed synergy for 31 strains (fractional inhibitory concentration [FIC] indices, < or = 0.5) cefpirome and teicoplanin showed synergy for 18 strains, cefotaxime and vancomycin showed synergy for 51 strains, and cefotaxime and teicoplanin showed synergy for 27 strains. Cefpirome and vancomycin had FIC indices indicating indifference (2.0) for two strains, and cefotaxime and vancomycin had FIC indices indicating indifference for one strain. All other FIC indices indicating indifference or additivity were > 0.5 to 1.0. No FIC indices indicating antagonism (> 4.0) were found. Synergy between beta-lactams and glycopeptides for three susceptible, three intermediate, and three resistant strains were tested by the time-kill assay, and all combinations were synergistic by this method. Synergy between cephalosporins and glycopeptides can be demonstrated and may be useful for the treatment of pneumococcal infections, especially meningitis.     

Role of rifampin against Propionibacterium acnes biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model

Propionibacterium acnes is an important cause of orthopedic-implant-associated infections, for which the optimal treatment has not yet been determined. We investigated the activity of rifampin, alone and in combination, against planktonic and biofilm P. acnes in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC and the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) were 0.007 and 4 μg/ml for rifampin, 1 and 4 μg/ml for daptomycin, 1 and 8 μg/ml for vancomycin, 1 and 2 μg/ml for levofloxacin, 0.03 and 16 μg/ml for penicillin G, 0.125 and 512 μg/ml for clindamycin, and 0.25 and 32 μg/ml for ceftriaxone. The P. acnes minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) was 16 μg/ml for rifampin; 32 μg/ml for penicillin G; 64 μg/ml for daptomycin and ceftriaxone; and ≥128 μg/ml for levofloxacin, vancomycin, and clindamycin. In the animal model, implants were infected by injection of 10⁹ CFU P. acnes in cages. Antimicrobial activity on P. acnes was investigated in the cage fluid (planktonic form) and on explanted cages (biofilm form). The cure rates were 4% for daptomycin, 17% for vancomycin, 0% for levofloxacin, and 36% for rifampin. Rifampin cured 63% of the infected cages in combination with daptomycin, 46% with vancomycin, and 25% with levofloxacin. While all tested antimicrobials showed good activity against planktonic P. acnes, for eradication of biofilms, rifampin was needed. In combination with rifampin, daptomycin showed higher cure rates than with vancomycin in this foreign-body infection model.     

In vitro activity of cefbuperazone compared with that of other new beta-lactam agents against anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance.

Cefbuperazone was compared with other currently available and investigational antibiotics against 278 clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli by an agar dilution method. Cefbuperazone and cefotetan were equally active against Bacteroides fragilis, with 8% of the organisms tested found to be resistant to 32 micrograms of either drug per ml. Cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefmetazole were less active against these strains; cefoxitin, moxalactam, piperacillin, clindamycin, and metronidazole were more active. None of the agents were consistently active against any of the other anaerobic gram-negative bacilli except imipenem, for which the minimum concentration required to inhibit 90% of all strains tested was 4 micrograms/ml. A 10,000-fold increase in inoculum size caused an increase in the MIC of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cefoperazone but not of cefbuperazone, cefotetan, or cefoxitin. Investigation of the mechanism of resistance to cephalosporin-like agents demonstrated a correlation between the level of resistance and beta-lactamase activity. Cefbuperazone, cefotetan, and cefoxitin were not hydrolyzed, had lower MICs, and were less affected by changes in inoculum size than were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefoperazone.     

In Vivo Efficacy of Ceftaroline Fosamil in a Methicillin-Resistant Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Producing Staphylococcus aureus Rabbit Pneumonia Model

Ceftaroline, the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil, is a cephalosporin with broad-spectrum in vitro activity against Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), and common Gram-negative pathogens. This study investigated the in vivo activity of ceftaroline fosamil compared with clindamycin, linezolid, and vancomycin in a severe pneumonia model due to MRSA-producing Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). A USA300 PVL-positive clone was used to induce pneumonia in rabbits. Infected rabbits were randomly assigned to no treatment or simulated human-equivalent dosing with ceftaroline fosamil, clindamycin, linezolid, or vancomycin. Residual bacterial concentrations in the lungs and spleen were assessed after 48 h of treatment. PVL expression was measured using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid considerably reduced mortality rates compared with the control, whereas vancomycin did not. Pulmonary and splenic bacterial titers and PVL concentrations were greatly reduced by ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid. Ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid were associated with reduced pulmonary tissue damage based on significantly lower macroscopic scores. Ceftaroline fosamil, clindamycin, and, to a lesser extent, linezolid were efficient in reducing bacterial titers in both the lungs and spleen and decreasing macroscopic scores and PVL production compared with the control.     

Susceptibility of gram-positive cocci to various antibiotics, including cefotaxime, moxalactam, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin

The activities of cefotaxime, moxalactam, MK 0787 (N-formimidoyl thienamycin), ampicillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, and clindamycin were compared against gram-positive cocci. MK 0787 was the most active and moxalactam was the least active of these drugs, except against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, where vancomycin was most active, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, where cefotaxime was more active.     

In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates from a multi-institutional outbreak in Southern Québec, Canada

Clostridium difficile isolates from a 2004 outbreak in Québec, Canada, were all found to be susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin, rifampin, and meropenem but resistant to bacitracin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin, and most (>80%) were resistant to ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin. The predominant NAP1 isolates were susceptible to clindamycin, while the NAP2 isolates were resistant.     

In vitro activity of ceftaroline against a broad spectrum of recent clinical anaerobic isolates

The in vitro activity of ceftaroline was compared with those of ceftriaxone, clindamycin, imipenem, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, tigecycline, and vancomycin against 514 clinical anaerobic isolates using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard methodology. Ceftaroline demonstrated good to excellent activity against Gram-positive anaerobic pathogens and limited activity against Gram-negative pathogens, particularly Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.     

Efficacy of Ceftaroline Fosamil against Penicillin-Sensitive and -Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in an Experimental Rabbit Meningitis Model

Ceftaroline is a new cephalosporin with bactericidal activity against resistant Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, as well as common Gram-negative organisms. This study tested the prodrug, ceftaroline fosamil, against a penicillin-sensitive and a penicillin-resistant strain of S. pneumoniae in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. The penetration of ceftaroline into inflamed meninges was approximately 14%. Ceftaroline fosamil was slightly superior to ceftriaxone against the penicillin-sensitive strain and significantly superior to the combination of ceftriaxone and vancomycin against the penicillin-resistant strain.     

Comparative In Vitro Activity of New Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Against Anaerobic Bacteria

Several new beta-lactam antimicrobial agents have been introduced in the last few years. In this investigation, the in vitro activities of several recently introduced cephalosporins (cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ceftizoxime), moxalactam, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin were compared with those of cefoxitin, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 203 strains of anaerobic bacteria. At achievable serum levels, all of the antimicrobial agents were active against essentially 100% of the strains of anaerobic gram-positive cocci, Clostridium perfringens, Leptotrichia buccalis, and species of Selenomonas, Veillonella, and Eubacterium. Clindamycin, metronidazole, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin were the most active agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group, inhibiting all strains at concentrations which can be achieved in serum. Of the remaining agents tested against the B. fragilis group, cefoxitin (which required 64 μg/ml to inhibit 90% of the strains) was the most active, followed by cefoperazone (128 μg/ml), cefotaxime (128 μg/ml), moxalactam (128 μg/ml), ceftizoxime (256 μg/ml), and ceftazidime (>256 μg/ml). Important differences in cephalosporin susceptibility among species of the B. fragilis group were observed. Metronidazole and N-formimidoyl thienamycin were the most active drugs against species of clostridia other than C. perfringens; the other antibiotics displayed poor activity, although this is partly due to inclusion of a relatively large number of strains of Clostridium difficile which were very resistant to several of the cephalosporins. Only metronidazole was active against all species of Fusobacterium. Clindamycin and N-formimidoyl thienamycin displayed excellent activity against gram-positive, non-spore-forming bacilli, requiring ≤8 μg/ml to inhibit 100% of the strains. Ceftazidime, cefoperazone, and moxalactam were bactericidal for 25 strains of B. fragilis at concentrations equal or close to those required for inhibition. On the basis of its activity in vitro, N-formimidoyl thienamycin appears to be the most promising of the new beta-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of infections involving anaerobic bacteria.     

In vitro activity against anaerobes of retapamulin, a new topical antibiotic for treatment of skin infections

OBJECTIVES: Retapamulin is the first agent of the pleuromutilin class formulated as a topical antibacterial for treating skin infections. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of retapamulin by determining the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of this new drug and comparators against a wide range of anaerobic bacteria of human origin. METHODS: The in vitro activity of retapamulin and six comparators (amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, imipenem, clindamycin and metronidazole) was evaluated against 232 anaerobic clinical isolates. MICs were determined by the CLSI reference agar dilution method (M11-A6). RESULTS: Ceftriaxone, clindamycin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid resistance rates were 54%, 42% and 9.6%, respectively, within the Bacteroides fragilis group. Despite high resistance rates to various antibiotics, retapamulin inhibited 37/52 (71%) strains of the B. fragilis group and 85/87 (98%) of the other Gram-negative bacilli at a concentration of 2 mg/L or less. All the investigated strains of Clostridium perfringens were inhibited by 1 mg/L retapamulin. Three strains of C. difficile and one strain of C. clostridioforme demonstrated decreased susceptibility to retapamulin. Based on inhibitory concentrations, retapamulin was more active than clindamycin, metronidazole and ceftriaxone against Propionibacterium acnes and anaerobic Gram-positive cocci, as all isolates were inhibited by 相似文献   

Efficacy of Trovafloxacin in Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal or Streptococcal Endocarditis

The efficacy of trovafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and viridans group streptococci was investigated in vitro and in an experimental model of endocarditis. The MICs at which trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin inhibited 90% of clinical isolates of such bacteria (MIC₉₀s) were (i) 0.03 and 2 mg/liter, respectively, for 30 ciprofloxacin-susceptible S. aureus isolates, (ii) 32 and 128 mg/liter, respectively, for 20 ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus isolates, and (iii) 0.25 and 8 mg/liter, respectively, for 28 viridans group streptococci. Rats with aortic vegetations were infected with either of two ciprofloxacin-susceptible but methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (strains COL and P8), one penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus sanguis strain, or one penicillin-resistant Streptococcus mitis strain. Rats were treated for 3 or 5 days with doses that resulted in kinetics that simulated those achieved in humans with trovafloxacin (200 mg orally once a day), ciprofloxacin (750 mg orally twice a day), vancomycin (1 g intravenously twice a day), or ceftriaxone (2 g intravenously once a day). Against the staphylococci, the activities of both trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equivalent to that of vancomycin, and treatment of endocarditis with these drugs was successful (P < 0.05). However, ciprofloxacin selected for resistant derivatives in vitro and in vivo, whereas trovafloxacin was 10 to 100 times less prone than ciprofloxacin to select for resistance in vitro and did not select for resistance in vivo. Against the two streptococcal isolates, trovafloxacin significantly (P < 0.05) decreased bacterial counts in the vegetations but was less effective than the control drug, ceftriaxone. Thus, a simulated oral dose of trovafloxacin (200 mg per day) was effective against ciprofloxacin-susceptible staphylococci and was less likely than ciprofloxacin to select for resistance. The simulated oral dose of trovafloxacin also had some activity against streptococcal endocarditis, but optimal treatment of infections caused by such organisms might require higher doses of the drug.     

In Vitro Activities of Cefminox against Anaerobic Bacteria Compared with Those of Nine Other Compounds

The agar dilution MIC method was used to test the activity of cefminox, a β-lactamase-stable cephamycin, compared with those of cefoxitin, cefotetan, moxalactam, ceftizoxime, cefotiam, cefamandole, cefoperazone, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 357 anaerobes. Overall, cefminox was the most active β-lactam, with an MIC at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC₅₀) of 1.0 μg/ml and an MIC₉₀ of 16.0 μg/ml. Other β-lactams were less active, with respective MIC₅₀s and MIC₉₀s of 2.0 and 64.0 μg/ml for cefoxitin, 2.0 and 128.0 μg/ml for cefotetan, 2.0 and 64.0 μg/ml for moxalactam, 4.0 and >128.0 μg/ml for ceftizoxime, 16.0 and >128.0 μg/ml for cefotiam, 8.0 and >128.0 μg/ml for cefamandole, and 4.0 and 128.0 μg/ml for cefoperazone. The clindamycin MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were 0.5 and 8.0 μg/ml, respectively, and the metronidazole MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were 1.0 and 4.0 μg/ml, respectively. Cefminox was especially active against Bacteroides fragilis (MIC₉₀, 2.0 μg/ml), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (MIC₉₀, 4.0 μg/ml), fusobacteria (MIC₉₀, 1.0 μg/ml), peptostreptococci (MIC₉₀, 2.0 μg/ml), and clostridia, including Clostridium difficile (MIC₉₀, 2.0 μg/ml). Time-kill studies performed with six representative anaerobic species revealed that at the MIC all compounds except ceftizoxime were bactericidal (99.9% killing) against all strains after 48 h. At 24 h, only cefminox and cefoxitin at 4× the MIC and cefoperazone at 8× the MIC were bactericidal against all strains. After 12 h, at the MIC all compounds except moxalactam, ceftizoxime, cefotiam, cefamandole, clindamycin, and metronidazole gave 90% killing of all strains. After 3 h, cefminox at 2× the MIC produced the most rapid effect, with 90% killing of all strains.     

In vitro activity of cefoperazone plus sulbactam compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

The activity of two cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against anaerobic bacteria was tested and compared both with that of cefoperazone alone and with that of other commonly used antimicrobial agents. Imipenem was the most active of the tested agents, followed by chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and cefoperazone-sulbactam (90 to 100% of bacterial growth inhibited). Clindamycin and cefoxitin inhibited approximately 80%, cefoperazone inhibited 63%, and penicillin G inhibited 47% of the strains tested. The agents were variable in activity against the Bacteroides fragilis group, with percents susceptible as follows: cefoperazone-sulbactam, imipenem, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol, 99 to 100%; cefoxitin and clindamycin, approximately 80%; cefoperazone, 49%; and penicillin G, 15.5%.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Clostridium difficile and its relation to PCR ribotypes in a Swedish university hospital

All 238 Clostridium difficile isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin, whereas 84% and 1% were resistant to clindamycin and fusidic acid. Etest MICs for metronidazole were lower than agar dilution MICs (P < 0.01) but without difference in susceptible-intermediate-resistant categorization. No particular PCR ribotype was associated with clindamycin or fusidic acid resistance.     

Evaluation of Moxifloxacin, a New 8-Methoxyquinolone, for Treatment of Meningitis Caused by a PenicillinResistant Pneumococcus in Rabbits

Moxifloxacin is a new 8-methoxyquinolone with high activity against gram-positive bacteria, including penicillin-resistant pneumococci. In an experimental meningitis model, we studied the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in infected and uninfected rabbits and evaluated the antibiotic efficacies of moxifloxacin, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin against a penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strain (penicillin, ceftriaxone, vancomycin, and moxifloxacin MICs were 1, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.125 μg/ml, respectively). Moxifloxacin entered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) readily, with peak values within 15 to 30 min after bolus intravenous infusion and with a mean percent penetration into normal and purulent CSF of approximately 50 and 80%, respectively. The bactericidal effect of moxifloxacin was concentration dependent, and regrowth was seen only when the concentration of moxifloxacin in CSF was below the minimal bactericidal concentration. All antibiotic-treated groups (moxifloxacin given in two doses of 40 mg/kg of body weight, moxifloxacin in two 20-mg/kg doses, ceftriaxone in one 125-mg/kg dose, and vancomycin in two 20-mg/kg doses) had significantly higher reductions in CSF bacterial concentration than the untreated group (P < 0.05). Moxifloxacin was as effective as vancomycin and ceftriaxone in reducing bacterial counts at all time points tested (3, 5, 10, and 24 h). Moreover, moxifloxacin given in two 40-mg/kg doses resulted in a significantly higher reduction in CSF bacterial concentration (in log₁₀ CFU per milliliter) than vancomycin within 3 h after the start of antibiotic treatment (3.49 [2.94 to 4.78] versus 2.50 [0.30 to 3.05]; P < 0.05). These results indicate that moxifloxacin could be useful in the treatment of meningitis, including penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis.     

我国示范乡镇卫生院基本药物循证评价与遴选之十:急性胆囊炎

目的基于疾病负担,循证评价与遴选我国示范乡镇卫生院治疗急性胆囊炎的基本药物。方法按本系列研究之二制定的方法、标准和流程,参考国内外循证或权威指南的推荐意见,结合国内相关临床研究及细菌耐药性证据,循证评价并推荐相关药物。主要采用RevMan 5.1、GRADEpro 3.6等软件处理数据、评价证据质量。结果①纳入指南3个(国外2个,国内1个),2个为循证制定,1个为结合专家意见制定;②治疗争性胆囊炎,2个RCT(n=200,低质量)和2个CCT(n=230,低质量)显示,氨苄西林/舒巴坦、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、环丙沙星和头孢他啶分别联合甲硝唑的有效率为92.5%、92.6%、92.5%和91.3%。3个RCT(n=661,低质量)显示,左氧氟沙星的有效率为82.2%～95.8%,联合甲硝唑的有效率为84.4～94.7%。3个RCT(n=553,低质量)显示,头孢曲松、头孢呋辛和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦的有效率分别为90%、73.7%和95.6%,联合甲硝唑的有效率分别为93.3%,82.5%和92.3%。1个RCT(n=72,低质量)显示,头孢唑啉的有效率为70.9%,细菌耐(G+/G–)药率为70%和87%。结论①强推荐哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗轻、中、重度急性胆囊炎;美罗培南、亚胺培南/西司他丁和甲硝唑作为重度急性胆囊炎的备选药物。②弱推荐头孢他啶、头孢吡肟治疗重度急性胆囊炎;头孢替安、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、头孢呋辛治疗轻、中度急性胆囊炎;左氧氟沙星、环丙沙星治疗轻、重度急性胆囊炎;头孢曲松治疗轻、中、重度急性胆囊炎。③不推荐头孢唑啉用于治疗急性胆囊炎。④建议尽量报道大样本对照研究,完善结局指标,以便生产高质量本土化证据。     

Antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance of obligate anaerobic bacteria in the Kinki area

Obligate anaerobes exist as resident flora in various sites in humans, but they are also emphasized as endogenous causative microorganism of infections. We performed surveillance to understand the trend of drug susceptibility in obligate anaerobic bacteria in the Kinki area of Japan. In the experiment, we used 156 obligate anaerobe isolates collected from 13 institutions that participated in the Study of Bacterial Resistance Kinki Region of Japan. MALDI Biotyper was used to identify the collected strains, and among the 156 test strains, those that could be identified with an accuracy of Score Value 2.0 or more included 6 genera, 30 species, and 144 strains (Bacteroides spp. 77 strains, Parabacteroides sp. 2 strains, Prevotella spp. 29 strains, Fusobacterium spp. 14 strains, Porphyromonas spp. 2 strains, and Clostridioides difficile 20 strains), and they were assigned as subject strains for drug susceptibility testing. The drug susceptibility test was carried out by broth microdilution method using Kyokuto Opt Panel MP ANA (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and judged according to CLSI criteria. As a result, Bacteroides and Parabacteroides species showed good sensitivities to tazobactam-piperacillin, imipenem, metronidazole and chloramphenicol, and low sensitivities to ampicillin, cefoperazone and vancomycin. Prevotella species showed good sensitivities to sulbactam-ampicillin, tazobactam-piperacillin, cefmetazole, imipenem, doripenem and metronidazole. Susceptibility rates to other drugs were slightly different depending on the bacterial species. Both Fusobacterium spp. and Porphyromonas spp. showed high sensitivities to many drugs. C. difficile was highly sensitive to vancomycin and metronidazole, having MIC₉₀s of 0.5 μg/mL and ≤2 μg/mL, respectively.     

Multicenter evaluation of the in vitro activity of dalbavancin tested against staphylococci and streptococci in 5 European countries: results from the DECIDE Surveillance Program (2007)

Dalbavancin is an antimicrobial lipoglycopeptide agent that has proven activity against Gram-positive pathogens and a once weekly dosing advantage compared with other agents in the glycopeptide class. The most common pathogens isolated from skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) include Staphylococcus aureus and β-hemolytic streptococci (βHS), and dalbavancin has demonstrated excellent activity against these species. This study used 18 medical center laboratories in 5 European countries to assess the activity of dalbavancin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin against S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and βHS. The rank order of potency was dalbavancin (MIC₅₀, 0.06 μg/mL) > teicoplanin (MIC₅₀, 0.5 μg/mL) > vancomycin (MIC₅₀, 2 μg/mL) and dalbavancin (MIC₅₀, 0.06 μg/mL) > teicoplanin and vancomycin (MIC₅₀, 2 μg/mL) against S. aureus and CoNS, respectively. Dalbavancin was the most active glycopeptide tested against βHS with all strains inhibited by ≤0.12 μg/mL. Susceptibility to other antimicrobial classes was also evaluated with noticeable differences demonstrated between countries. Higher methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) rates were observed in Italy (44.2%) and the United Kingdom (36.8%) compared with other countries, but resistance to erythromycin (51.6–83.1%) and clindamycin (5.7–68.4%) among MRSA also varied significantly between countries. The excellent contemporary activity of dalbavancin against common Gram-positive pathogens collected in European countries suggests that dalbavancin could have a role in the treatment of various types of SSSIs.