Left atrial mechanical function after brief duration atrial fibrillation

ObjectivesThis study examined the effect of brief duration atrial fibrillation on left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanical function in humans with structural heart disease.BackgroundLeft atrial dysfunction and the development of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) may follow the cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. This phenomenon has been termed “stunning” and is implicated in the development of atrial thrombus and embolic stroke. The effects of brief duration AF on left atrial mechanical function in humans are unknown.MethodsTwenty-four patients (23 men, aged 59.1 ± 12.7 years) with significant structural heart disease (ejection fraction 31.2 ± 9.0%, left atrial diameter 4.9 ± 0.4 cm) undergoing implantation of a ventricular cardiodefibrillator underwent transesophageal echocardiography to evaluate left atrial appendage emptying velocities (LAAeV) and SEC before, during and after a 15-min period of AF induced by rapid right atrial pacing. Atrial fibrillation was then permitted to terminate spontaneously within 5 min or was reverted with an endocardial direct current shock. Velocities and SEC were assessed in sinus rhythm pre-AF, during AF and immediately, 5 and 10 min after reversion to sinus rhythm.ResultsAtrial fibrillation terminated spontaneously in 10 patients after 16.1 ± 1.0 min. Endocardial direct current (DC) cardioversion of 10.4 ± 6.4 J was required in 14 patients after AF lasting 20 min. Mean LAAeV pre-AF (50.0 ± 17.5 cm/s) was not significantly different to LAAeV immediately (52.8 ± 16.7 cm/s), 5 min (54.3 ± 16.4 cm/s) or 10 min (53.7 ± 15.7 cm/s) after reversion to sinus rhythm. Atrial stunning defined as a reduction in LAAeV of >20% was not observed in any patient. Fourteen of 24 patients (58%) developed SEC during AF, which resolved within 30 s of AF termination. There were no significant differences between LAAeV in those patients reverting with DC shock (pre-AF 50.6 ± 16.2 cm/s vs. immediately post-AF 54.7 ± 16.6 cm/s) or in those patients with spontaneous reversion (pre-AF 48.9 ± 20.2 cm/s vs. immediately post-AF 49.8 ± 17.3 cm/s).ConclusionsSignificant left atrial stunning was not observed after brief duration AF in humans with structural heart disease. Transient left atrial SEC develops in a significant proportion of these patients during AF but resolves rapidly on reversion to sinus rhythm. These findings suggest that the risk of thromboembolism may be low after brief duration AF that terminates either spontaneously or with an endocardial DC shock even in patients with significant structural heart disease. These findings have important implications for recipients of implantable devices that are capable of atrial defibrillation in response to AF.     

The effect of endocardial defibrillator shocks on basic atrial electrophysiology in man. Is post cardioversion atrial electrical 'remodelling' artefact?

AIMS: To determine the effect of an endocardial DC shock on the basic electrophysiology of the human atrium if delivered in sinus rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 5J endocardial R wave synchronized DC shock was delivered in 10 patients in stable sinus rhythm during ICD implantation for ventricular arrhythmias. There was no prior history of atrial fibrillation. Monophasic action potential duration (APD) and atrial effective refractory periods (AERP) were evaluated before, 1 min post DC shock, and 15 min post shock. These parameters were assessed at basic cycle lengths and at atrial paced cycle lengths of 600 ms and 400 ms at two right atrial sites; mid lateral right atrial wall (MRLA) and the right atrial appendage (RAA). There were no significant differences in APD 90, AERP or atrial refractory dispersion at any site or drive cycle length before, immediately after or 15 min after shock delivery. CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant changes in basic electrophysiological parameters following a DC shock delivered in sinus rhythm in patients with no prior history of atrial fibrillation. This suggests that atrial electrical remodelling occurs as a result of atrial fibrillation and is unrelated to shock artefact.     

Left atrial “stunning” following radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutter

Objectives. This study examined the effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) function in humans with chronic atrial flutter (AFL).Background. Atrial stunning and the development of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) is a consequence of electrical cardioversion of AFL to sinus rhythm. This phenomenon has been termed “stunning” and is associated with thrombus formation and embolic stroke. Radiofrequency ablation is now considered to be definitive treatment for chronic AFL, but whether this procedure is complicated by LA stunning is unknown.Methods. Fifteen patients with chronic AFL undergoing curative RFA underwent transesophageal echocardiography to evaluate LA and LAA function and SEC before and immediately, 30 minutes and 3 weeks after RFA. To control for possible direct effects of RFA on atrial function, seven patients undergoing RFA for paroxysmal AFL were also studied. In this group, RF energy was delivered in sinus rhythm and echocardiographic parameters were assessed before and immediately and 30 minutes following RFA.Results. Chronic AFL: Mean arrhythmia duration was 17.2 ± 13.3 months. Twelve patients (80%) developed SEC following RF energy application and reversion to sinus rhythm. LAA velocities decreased significantly from 54.0 ± 14.2 cm/s in AFL to 18.0 ± 7.1 cm/s in sinus rhythm after arrhythmia termination (p < 0.01). These changes persisted for 30 minutes. Following 3 weeks of sustained sinus rhythm, significant improvements in LAA velocities (68.9 ± 23.6 vs. 18.0 ± 7.1 cm/s, p < 0.01) and mitral A-wave velocities (49.8 ± 10.3 vs. 13.4 ± 11.2 cm/s, p < 0.01) were evident and SEC had resolved in all patients. Paroxysmal AFL: Radiofrequency energy delivered in sinus rhythm had no significant effect on any of the above indexes of LA or LAA function and no patient developed SEC following RFA.Conclusions. Radiofrequency ablation of chronic AFL is associated with significant LA stunning and the development of SEC. Left atrial stunning is not secondary to the RF energy application itself. Sustained sinus rhythm for 3 weeks leads to resolution of these acute phenomena. Left atrial stunning occurs in the absence of direct current shock or antiarrhythmic drugs, suggesting that its mechanism may be a function of the preceding arrhythmia rather than the mode of reversion.     

Serial evaluation of left atrial dimension after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and relation to atrial function

The size of the left atrium is usually increased during atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate changes in left atrial (LA) dimension after cardioversion for AF, and the relation between LA dimension and atrial function. The initial study population included 171 consecutive patients. Patients who had spontaneous cardioversion to sinus rhythm (56 patients) were compared with patients who had random cardio-version with drugs (50 patients) or direct-current (DC) shock (50 patients). Echocardiographic evaluations included LA size and volume. LA passive and active emptying volumes were calculated, and LA function was assessed. Atrial stunning was observed in 18 patients reverted with DC shock and in 7 patients reverted with drugs. The left atrium was dilated in all patients during AF (48 +/- 5 mm). The size of the left atrium decreased after restoration of sinus rhythm in all patients with spontaneous reversion to sinus rhythm, in 73% of patients reverted with drugs, and in 50% of patients reverted with DC shock. The comparison between patients with a normal mechanical atrial function and patients with reduced atrial function showed that a higher atrial ejection force was associated with a more marked reduction in LA size after restoration of sinus rhythm. A relation between LA volumes and atrial ejection force was observed in the group of patients with depressed atrial mechanical function (r = -0.78; p <0.001). The active emptying fraction was lower, although not significantly, in this group, whereas the conduit volume was increased. Thus, a depressed atrial mechanical function after cardioversion for AF was associated with a persistence of LA dilation.     

Effect of radiofrequency ablation on atrial mechanical function in patients with atrial flutter.

Atrial stunning, as assessed by left atrial appendage emptying and increased spontaneous echo contrast, is known to occur following direct-current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFI). Little is known on atrial mechanical function and the time course of atrial recovery following radiofrequency ablation of AFI. Fourteen patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of persistent typical counterclockwise AFI were enrolled. Two-dimensional and pulse Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were performed before ablation and immediately following restoration of sinus rhythm. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast grades, left atrial appendage emptying fractions, and peak left atrial appendage emptying velocities were measured. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed immediately after ablation, then repeated after 1 day, 1 week, and 6 weeks to measure peak transmitral velocities and percent atrial contribution to ventricular filling. Left atrial appendage emptying velocities decreased significantly following AFI termination (44 +/- 23 cm/s before ablation vs 25 +/- 14 cm/s after ablation, p = 0.01). Left atrial appendage emptying fractions also decreased significantly (0.48 +/- 0.1 preablation vs 0.34 +/- 0.17 postablation, p = 0.02). New spontaneous echo contrast developed in 4 patients (29%) after ablation. Four patients had complete atrial standstill after ablation, and 1 patient developed a new left atrial appendage thrombus. The percent atrial contribution to ventricular filling recovered progressively over 6 weeks with significant improvement in peak transmitral velocities at day 7. Thus, atrial stunning occurs after catheter ablation of AFI and may lead to rapid formation of thrombus in the left atrial appendage. Significant improvement in left atrial function occurs in 7 days.     

Atrial stunning: basics and clinical considerations

Conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter to sinus rhythm results in a transient mechanical dysfunction of atrium and atrial appendage, termed atrial stunning. Atrial stunning has been reported with all modes of conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter to sinus rhythm including both transthoracic and low energy internal electrical, pharmacological, and spontaneous cardioversion, and conversion by overdrive pacing and by radiofrequency ablation. Atrial stunning is a function of the underlying arrhythmia becoming apparent at the restoration of sinus rhythm, not the function of the mode of conversion, and does not develop after the unsuccessful attempts of cardioversion or the delivery of electric current to the heart during rhythms other than atrial fibrillation or flutter. Tachycardia-induced atrial cardiomyopathy, cytosolic calcium accumulation, and atrial hibernation are the suggested mechanisms of atrial stunning. Atrial stunning is at maximum immediately after cardioversion and improves progressively with a complete resolution within a few minutes to 4-6 weeks depending on the duration of the preceding atrial fibrillation, atrial size, and structural heart disease. Atrial stunning causes postcardioversion thromboembolism despite restoration of sinus rhythm. Duration of anticoagulation therapy after successful cardioversion should depend on the duration of atrial stunning. Lack of improvement in cardiac output and functional recovery of patients immediately after cardioversion is attributed to the atrial stunning. Verapamil, acetylstrophenathidine, isoproterenol, and dofetilide have been reported to protect from atrial stunning in animal and small human studies. Right atrium stunning is less marked and improves earlier than that of left atrium, resulting in a differential atrial stunning explaining the rare occurrence of pulmonary edema after cardioversion.     

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.

AIMS: It is well established in transthoracic ventricular defibrillation that biphasic truncated waveform shocks are associated with superior defibrillation efficacy when compared with damped sine wave monophasic waveform shocks. The aim of this study was to explore whether biphasic waveform shocks were superior to monophasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in whom cardioversion of AF was indicated were randomized in this prospective study, to transthoracic cardioversion with either monophasic damped sine waveform shocks or biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks. In the group randomized to monophasic waveform shocks (27 patients), a first shock of 150 J was delivered, followed (if necessary) by a 360 J shock. In the biphasic waveform group (30 patients), the first shock had an energy of 150 J and (if necessary) a second 150 J was delivered. All shocks were delivered in the anterolateral chest pad position. Sinus rhythm was restored in 16 patients (51%) with the first monophasic shock and in 27 patients (86%) with the first biphasic shock. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.02). After the second shock, sinus rhythm was obtained in a total of 24 patients (88%) with monophasic shocks and in 28 patients (93%) with biphasic shocks. No complication was observed in either group and cardiac enzymes (CK, CKmb, troponin I, myoglobin) did not show any significant changes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that at the same energy level of 150 J, biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks are superior to monophasic damped sine waveform shocks cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.     

Echocardiographic Parameters for Predicting Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm After Internal Atrial Defibrillation

Chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), which is refractory to external electrical direct current shock and/or pharmacologic cardioversion, may be successfully cardioverted using internal atrial defibrillation. To avoid unnecessary procedures, it is important to be able to predict which patients will revert to AF. Thirty-eight patients with chronic AF underwent successful internal atrial defibrillation and were followed for 6 months after restoration of sinus rhythm. Left atrial (LA) diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, maximum LA appendage area, and peak emptying velocities of the LA appendage were analyzed to determine which of these factors were associated with recurrence of AF. Forty-nine percent of patients had a recurrence of AF within 6 months following internal atrial defibrillation. The preprocedural ejection fraction (mean ± SD 59 + 14% vs 57 + 13%, p = 0.63), LA diameter (4.2 ± 0.6 cm vs 4.5 ± 0.6 cm, p = 0.16), and LA appendage area (5.0 ± 1.5 cm² vs 5.8 ± 1.5 cm², p = 0.13) did not differ significantly between patients who maintained sinus rhythm and those who had recurrence of AF. Peak emptying velocities of the LA appendage before cardioversion were significantly lower in patients with recurrence of AF compared with patients who maintained sinus rhythm (0.26 ± 0.1 m/s vs 0.49 ± 0.17 m/s, p = 0.001). A peak emptying velocity <0.36 had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 83% for predicting recurrence of AF.     

Impairment of left atrial appendage function after spontaneous conversion of atrial flutter

This paper reports a patient in atrial flutter who spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm while undergoing a transesophageal echocardiogram. Atrial appendage flow velocities were noted to be significantly decreased after conversion to sinus rhythm. Spontaneous contrast also developed in the left atrium shortly after conversion. Spontaneous cardioversion may be associated with decreased mechanical activity of the left atrium and appendage, resulting in “stunning.” This provides a possible explanation for the occurrence of thromboembolic events in patients without apparent thrombus before cardioversion.     

心房颤动患者复律前后左心房功能变化的超声研究

目的　探讨心房颤动 ( AF )复律后左心房功能变化的特点。方法　选择 AF病人 96例 ,按心脏节律转复的方式分为自发性复律 ( A)组 2 4例 ,药物复律 ( B)组 40例及直流电复律 ( C)组 3 2例 ;分别应用超声心动图测定其左心房内径和容积 ,计算左心房主动和被动排空容积 ,并评价左心房功能。结果　AF时所有病人的左心房扩大 ,而恢复窦性心律后 A、B及 C组左心房内径降低者分别为 10 0 %、74%及 5 2 %。 62例左心房机械功能正常患者与 3 4例左心房功能降低患者比较有更强的左心房射血力 ( LAEF ) ,这与复律后左心房内径降低有关。左心房功能异常( L AEF<7达因 )患者左心房内径和容积分别与左心房射血力呈负相关 ( r=-0 .72和 -0 .76,P<0 .0 0 1)。左心房主动排空分数降低而管道容积却增加。结论　心房颤动复律后 ,左心房机械功能的延迟恢复与持续存在的的左心房扩大有关     

Treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: Part II

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often complicated by a life-threatening ventricular response, and emergency electrocardioversion and/or drug therapy to reduce the rapid ventricular rate may be necessary. However, patients with AF and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome should not be given digoxin or calcium channel blockers. Elective direct current (DC) cardioversion has a higher success rate and a lower incidence of cardiac adverse effects than does medical cardioversion in converting AF to sinus rhythm. Unless transesophageal echocardiography has shown no thrombus in the left atrial appendage before cardioversion, oral warfarin should be given for 3 weeks before elective direct current or drug cardioversion of AF and continued for at least 4 weeks after maintenance of sinus rhythm. Many cardiologists prefer, especially in older patients, ventricular rate control plus warfarin rather than maintaining sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients with chronic or paroxysmal AF at high risk for stroke should be treated with long-term warfarin to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. Patients with AF at low risk for stroke or with contraindications to warfarin should be treated with aspirin 325 mg daily. Management of atrial flutter is similar to management of AF.     

“Stunning” of the left atrium after spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: Demonstration by transesophageal Doppler techniques in a canine model

Objectives. This study compared left atrial and left atrial appendage contraction velocities in sinus rhythm before and after a brief period of atrial fibrillation in a canine model.

Background. In patients, left atrial appendage contraction velocities measured during sinus rhythm after cardioversion from atrial fibrillation are depressed relative to left atrial appendage emptying velocities measured during atrial fibrillation, suggesting that the left atrial appendage is mechanically “stunned.”

Methods. This phenomenon was studied in a canine model of acute (60 min) pacing-induced atrial fibrillation followed by spontaneous reversion to sinus rhythm using epicardial and transesophageal pulsed wave Doppler. Unique features of the model include: 1) comparison of left atrial function postconversion to baseline sinus rhythm rather than to measurements during atrial fibrillation, 2) control of the duration of atrial fibrillation and 3) elimination of the extraneous influences of direct current shock and antiarrhythmic agents, which may independently depress left atrial function.

Results. Hemodynamic conditions (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, mean pulmonary artery pressure, mean right atrial pressure and mean left atrial pressure) at baseline, during 60 min of atrial fibrillation and after reversion to sinus rhythm were constant throughout the study period. Peak left atrial contraction velocities (measured from the transmitral flow velocity profile) were significantly (p < 0.02) reduced to 64 ± 22% of baseline values upon spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and recovered to basal values by 20 min after resumption of sinus rhythm. Peak left atrial appendage contraction velocities were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced to 49 ± 24% of baseline values upon spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and recovered to basal values by 40 min after reversion to sinus rhythm.

Conclusions. Even brief (60 min) periods of atrial fibrillation in normal canine hearts result in marked depression of global left atrial systolic function and regional left atrial (left atrial appendage) systolic function upon resumption of sinus rhythm. This “mechanical stunning” of left atrial systolic function appears to be more profound and of longer duration for the left atrial appendage compared with the left atrium as a whole, which may predispose the appendage to blood stasis and thrombus formation. Chronic models of atrial fibrillation need to be developed to examine the impact of longer periods of atrial fibrillation upon the magnitude and duration of postconversion left atrial “stunning.”     

Congenital absence of left atrial appendage: A case report and literature review

Congenital absence of left atrial appendage (LAA) is an extremely rare entity. A 50-year-old man with no past cardiac history was admitted with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Before subjecting him to direct current (DC) cardioversion, the patient underwent a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination, but neither LAA nor a cardiac thrombus could be detected. Absence of both was confirmed by cardiac computer tomography (CT) and a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The patient reverted to sinus rhythm with an uneventful synchronized biphasic DC shock of 100 joules.     

Echocardiographic factors predictive of restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm after reduction of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. While the arrhythmia was initially thought to be little more than a nuisance, it is now clear that AF has a significant negative impact on quality of life and a corresponding increase in both morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify Doppler echographic patterns that allow prediction of atrial fibrillation reduction and maintenance of sinus rhythm within 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients having permanent atrial fibrillation, recent (51) or chronic (79) are included in the study, excepting those with valvular heart disease or thyroid dysfunction. The mean age was 63.5 +/- 11.3 years. Both transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography was performed using a Philips SONOS 5500 Echograph, before cardioversion. Were studied: end diastolic and systolic left ventricular diameters, left ventricular ejectionnal fraction, left atrial area (LAA), left atrial diameter, left atrial appendage area and peak emptying velocities of the left atrial appendage (PeV). Sinus rhythm was re-established in 102 patients (44 having recent and 58 chronic atrial fibrillation). Sinus rhythm was maintained for 12 months in 79 patients. RESULTS: Within the echographic parameters studied, the left atrial area (LAA) and peak emptying velocities of left atrial appendage (PeV) before cardioversion were the best predictors of restoration of sinus rhythm. On monovariate analysis, SOG is significantly lower and PicV is significantly higher in patients whose sinus rhythm had been restored in comparison with those with permanent atrial fibrillation. (Mean SOG: 27.7 +/- 7.62 vs. 34 +/- 7,6 cm2, p<0.0001; Mean PicV: 44 +/- 15.8 vs. 31.4 +/- 13,7 cm/s, p<0.0001). This difference was maintained on multivariate analysis (p=0.002 for SOG and p=0.005 for PicV). In patients with recent atrial fibrillation, only left atrial area can predict on mono and multivariate analysis (p=0.05, OR=0.5, IC=0.36 à 3.56), re-establishing of sinus rhythm whereas in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, peak emptying velocity of left atrial appendage predict better re-establishing of sinus rhythm (p=0.04, OR=1.29, IC=0.12 à 4.23). The threshold values of LAA and PeV for conversion of atrial fibrillation into sinus rhythm are respectively 25 cm2 and 20 cm/sec. In patients who converted into sinus rhythm; LAA predict maintenance of sinus rhythm at the end of 12 months of survey (p=0.04) with a threshold value of 25 cm2. In the subgroup of patients admitted with chronic atrial fibrillation, PeV predicts better the maintenance of sinus rhythm (p=0.05) with a threshold value of 60 cm/sec, p=0.06; whereas LAA remains better in patients with a recent atrial fibrillation. (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: In addition to the anatomic study of cardiac structure and the search of intracavitary thromboses before reduction of atrial fibrillation, echocardiography allows prediction of cardioversion success (LAA and PeV) and maintenance of sinus rhythm within 12 months.     

Atrial Mechanical Function Before and After Electrical or Amiodarone Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation: Assessment by Transesophageal Echocardiography and Pulsed Doppler

In some patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), it has been suggested that left atrial mechanical dysfunction can develop after successful electrical cardioversion, justifying postcardioversion anticoagulant treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in left atrial appendage peak flow velocities and the incidence of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with AF before and after electrical cardioversion or intravenous amiodarone, studied using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulsed Doppler. We performed a control TEE in 7 patients in the electrical group and 6 in the amiodarone group, with no significant clinical differences between both groups. A second TEE was performed immediately in the 7 patients with successful electrical cardioversion. The peak flow velocities in the appendage before and after the procedure were: filling 43.3 ± 22 vs 27.7 ± 28 cm/sec (P = 0.01) and emptying 35.5 ± 22 vs 23.6 ± 17 cm/sec (P = 0.01), respectively. The spontaneous echo contrast increased in 4 of the 7 patients. In 4 patients of the amiodarone group, the peak flow velocities in the appendage during AF and within the first 24 hours after restoration of sinus rhythm were: filling 37.4 ± 12 vs 37.8 ± 18 cm/sec and emptying 36.4 ± 18 vs 35.9 ± 18 cm/sec, respectively (P = NS). There was no change in spontaneous echo contrast. In conclusion, patients with AF reverted to sinus rhythm using amiodarone did not show changes in left atrial mechanical function; however, patients with electrical cardioversion showed mechanical dysfunction. Further investigations on the effects of amiodarone and other drugs on the mechanical function of the atria are needed to determine if patients reverted pharmacologically require antico-agulation post reversion.     

Low energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation resistant to transthoracic shocks.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of internal cardioversion using low energy shocks delivered with a biatrial electrode configuration in chronic atrial fibrillation resistant to transthoracic shocks. METHODS: Low energy internal cardioversion was attempted in 11 patients who had been in atrial fibrillation for 233 (SD 193) days and had failed to cardiovert with transthoracic shocks of 360 J in both apex-base and anterior-posterior positions. Synchronised biphasic shocks of up to 400 V (approximately 6 J) were delivered, usually with intravenous sedation only, between high surface area electrodes in the right atrium and the left atrium (coronary sinus in nine, left pulmonary artery in one, left atrium via patent foramen ovale in one). RESULTS: Sinus rhythm was restored in 8/11 patients. The mean leading edge voltage of successful shocks was 363 (46) V [4.9 (1.2) J]. Higher energy shocks induced transient bradycardia [time to first R wave 1955 (218) ms]. No proarrhythmia or other acute complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation can restore sinus rhythm in patients in whom conventional transthoracic shocks have failed.     

Stunning of the left atrium after pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Stunning of the left atrium and atrial appendage is a well known but not fully clarified phenomenon observed during the cardioversion of atrial fibrillation regardless of the cardioversion method attempted. AIM: To assess the effects of propafenone and amiodarone on left atrium and left atrial appendage contractility. METHODS: Forty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (20 females, 20 males), aged 60-83 (mean 72.0+/-10.1) years, were enrolled into the study. Half of these patients had sinus rhythm restored by the administration of oral propafenone (150-300 mg) and the remaining 20 patients were treated with intravenous amiodarone (150-450 mg). The control group consisted of 20 patients (10 females, 10 males) aged 52-78 (mean 61.2+/-9.3) years with sinus rhythm and no history of atrial fibrillation. All the patients had a transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography performed while still in the AF, before drug administration and 1 hour after sinus rhythm restoration. RESULTS: All haemodynamic parameters of the left atrium measured after the sinus rhythm restoration were significantly worse when compared with the control group. Left atrial fractional shortening and total atrial fraction were significantly lower after propafenone than amiodarone (8.6+/-3.6% vs 11.7+/-5.5%, p<0.05; and LA FC 16.2+/-5.3% vs 23.3 (+/-6.3)% respectively, p<0.05). Doppler echocardiographic parameters included in the analysis such as mitral flow and superior left pulmonary vein flow were significantly lower in the sinus rhythm restoration group than in the control group. Among them the end-diastolic mitral flow velocity amplitude and flow velocity integral as well as the maximum pulmonary retrograde velocity were significantly worse in the group treated with propafenone than in patients receiving amiodarone. All the atrial appendage Doppler velocity parameters were significantly reduced after the sinus rhythm restoration in both groups. In the patients treated with propafenone, values of these parameters were significantly decreased compared with the patients receiving amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: Successful pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation causes the left atrium and left atrial appendage contractility impairment similar to that observed with other methods of the sinus rhythm restoration. Following the AF cardioversion the level of left atrial stunning is higher in the patients treated with propafenone than in subjects receiving amiodarone.     

非瓣膜病心房颤动病人电复律前后左心房功能变化研究

目的评价经食道超声心动图(TEE)对非瓣膜病心房颤动(房颤)病人电复律前后左心房功能变化.方法选择房颤持续2周以上的非瓣膜疾病病人18例,其中原发性高血压6例,扩张型心肌病6例,脑血栓4例,缺血性心肌病2例.应用TEE确定左心房内无血栓后行电复律,转为窦性心律者测定左心耳血流最大速度及流速积分,肺静脉血流最大速度及流速积分、二尖瓣血流最大速度、流速积分及减速时间.结果左心耳排空速度于复律后显著减少,有显著性差异(P＜0.05),排空指数增加(P＞0.05),电复律后肺静脉收缩期、舒张期最大流速及其流速积分比值无显著差异(P＞0.05),收缩期最大流速积分在左、右肺静脉均有显著差异(P均＜0.05).复律前后舒张期最大流速积分在右肺静脉有显著性差异(P＜0.05),左肺静脉差异不显著(P＞0.05).二尖瓣血流E波最大速度及E波与A波比值(E/A)增加.结论适合的抗凝治疗及TEE确认心房内无附壁血栓后进行电复律治疗,安全又无并发症.TEE能评价房颤病人电复律后的左心房功能变化.电复律后心房的电活动及机械活动均微弱,能引起左心房功能不全及栓塞,所以心房功能完全恢复前均有必要进行抗凝治疗.     

Simultaneous double external DC shock technique for refractory atrial fibrillation in concomitant heart disease

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been treated with DC shocks delivered transthoracically, but in 5-30% of patients, the procedures fail to restore sinus rhythm (SR). We hypothesized that applying high energy shock waves to the chest may overcome the inadequate penetration of electrical shock to the atrium. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of higher energy external DC shock for the treatment of refractory AF coexisting with cardiovascular disease using a synchronized double external defibrillator. Fifteen patients (mean age 65 +/- 8) with refractory AF to standard DC cardioversion (CV) underwent higher energy DC shock using a double external defibrillator. Concomitant heart disease was present in all patients. Warfarin and amiodarone (600 mg/day), were administered for at least three weeks duration before DC CV. Sedation was performed with IV midazolam. Two defibrillator paddles were positioned on the anterior and posterior chest wall in a right lateral decubitus position. Defibrillators were synchronized to the R waves and simultaneously 720 joules of energy was administered to the patients. Amiodarone (200 mg/day) was continuously administered after DC shock to maintain SR. Sinus rhythm was obtained in 13 patients. Sinus rhythm was persistent in 11 patients for six months duration. Creatine kinase MB fractions were normal at 4 (22 +/- 4 IU/L) and 12 hours (18 +/- 4 IU/L). None of the patients developed significant hemodynamic compromise or congestive heart failure, higher AV block, stroke, or transient ischemic cerebral events. The results indicate that higher energy DC shock application using a double external defibrillator is an effective and safe method for the cardioversion of refractory AF. We believe this procedure should be performed before internal atrial cardioversion.     

Management of the older person with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a higher incidence of mortality, stroke, and coronary events than is sinus rhythm. AF with a rapid ventricular rate may cause a tachycardia-related cardiomyopathy. Immediate direct-current (DC) cardioversion should be performed in patients with AF and acute myocardial infarction, chest pain due to myocardial ischemia, hypotension, severe heart failure, or syncope. Intravenous beta blockers, verapamil, or diltiazem may be given to slow immediately a very rapid ventricular rate in AF. An oral beta blocker, verapamil, or diltiazem should be used in persons with AF if a fast ventricular rate occurs at rest or during exercise despite digoxin. Amiodarone may be used in selected patients with symptomatic life-threatening AF refractory to other drugs. Nondrug therapies should be performed in patients with symptomatic AF in whom a rapid ventricular rate cannot be slowed by drugs. Paroxysmal AF associated with the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome should be treated with a permanent pacemaker in combination with drugs. A permanent pacemaker should be implanted in patients with AF and with symptoms such as dizziness or syncope associated with ventricular pauses greater than 3 seconds that are not drug-induced. Elective DC cardioversion has a higher success rate and a lower incidence of cardiac adverse effects than does medical cardioversion in converting AF to sinus rhythm. Unless transesophageal echocardiography has shown no thrombus in the left atrial appendage before cardioversion, oral warfarin should be given for 3 weeks before elective DC or drug cardioversion of AF and should be continued for at least 4 weeks after maintenance of sinus rhythm. Many cardiologists prefer, especially in older persons, ventricular rate control plus warfarin rather than maintaining sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drugs. Digoxin should not be used to treat patients with paroxysmal AF. Patients with chronic or paroxysmal AF at high risk for stroke should be treated with long-term warfarin to achieve an International Normalized Ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. Patients with AF at low risk for stroke or with contraindications to warfarin should receive 325 mg of aspirin daily.