Cost comparison of heart transplant vs. left ventricular assist device therapy at one year

With the worldwide shortage of donor organs, use of ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy is rapidly increasing in both the bridge to transplant and destination therapy settings. However, the high cost of VADs and VAD care is a cause for concern for policy makers who have relied on the limited supply of donor hearts to naturally cap health expenditure on heart transplantation (HTx). We sought to compare costs of the first 12 months of care of VADs vs. HTx. Single center retrospective study utilizing real generated costs over a three yr span from 2010–2012. Only patients with 12 months of costing data were included. Costs of 28 HTx patients and 24 VAD patients were analyzed. Index admission costs were more than double in the VAD group compared to the HTx group and this was driven by the procurement costs and length of stay which increased almost all aspects of in hospital care costs. Subsequent costs were six times higher in the HTx group and this was driven largely by pharmaceuticals. VAD therapy remains a very expensive treatment option for end stage heart failure patients. Device prices need to reduce substantially to make this a more widely applicable and cost effective treatment option.     

Miniaturized centrifugal ventricular assist device for bridge to decision: Preclinical chronic study in a bovine model

We developed a novel miniaturized extracorporeal centrifugal pump “BIOFLOAT NCVC (Nipro Corporation Osaka, Japan) as a ventricular assist device (VAD) and performed a preclinical study that is part of the process for its approval as a bridge to decision by the pharmaceutical and medical device agencies. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative performance, hemocompatibility, and anticoagulative status during an extended period of its use. A VAD system, consisting of a hydrodynamically levitated pump, measuring 64 mm by 131 mm in size and weighing 635 g, was used. We installed this assist system in 9 adult calves (body weight, 90 ± 13 kg): as left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in 6 calves and right ventricular assist device (RVAD) in 3 calves, for over 30 days. Perioperative hemodynamic, hematologic, and blood chemistry measurements were obtained and end‐organ effects on necropsy were investigated. All calves survived for over 30 days, with a good general condition. The blood pump was operated at a mean rotational speed and a mean pump flow of 3482 ± 192 rpm and 4.08 ± 0.15 L/min, respectively, for the LVAD and 3902 ± 210 rpm and 4.24 ± 0.3 L/min, respectively, for the RVAD. Major adverse events, including neurological or respiratory complications, bleeding events, and infection were not observed. This novel VAD enabled a long‐term support with consistent and satisfactory hemodynamic performance and hemocompatibility in the calf model. The hemodynamic performance, hemocompatibility, and anticoagulative status of this VAD system were reviewed.     

Patient selection for left ventricular assist devices

The use of mechanical support as a bridge to cardiac transplant has become the standard of care in many cardiac transplant centers. This therapy has been shown to increase survival and improve morbidity in carefully selected patients waiting for heart transplantation. With approximately 30000 patients being listed worldwide for transplant every year and only 3500 transplantations performed annually, alternative strategies need to be developed to minimize morbidity and mortality in this high-risk population. Patient selection remains the primary determinant of success with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. This article will review both the cardiac and extracardiac considerations needed in the assessment of patient suitability for LVAD support as a bridge to transplantation.     

Minimal invasive temporary percutaneous right ventricular circulatory support after left ventricular assist device implantation

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESCardiogenic shock is a life-threatening situation with high mortality rates. Mechanical unloading of the left ventricle may be achieved via left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Postoperative right ventricular (RV) failure, however, has very limited therapeutic options and is associated with increased postoperative mortality. In this paper, we describe a percutaneous right heart bypass for temporary postoperative RV support.METHODSWe retrospectively examined all patients receiving percutaneous RV mechanical support after LVAD implantation. All patients receiving trans-jugular mechanical right heart bypass during or after LVAD implantation in our tertiary medical centre between November 2014 and December 2019 were examined retrospectively. The venous draining cannula was placed in the femoral vein; the pulmonary cannula was placed in the pulmonary artery using fluoroscopy.RESULTSIn total, 14 patients received RV support using the trans-jugular technique. Mean age was 48.4 ± 14.9 years. Nine patients were treated with mechanical circulatory support before LVAD implantation. Biventricular support was done in 7 patients. All patients were treated with an Heartware HVAD . Mean postoperative intensive care unit stay was 46.3 ± 32.4 days. Mean right heart bypass support time was 10.6 ± 4.3 days. Twelve patients (86%) could be bridged to RV recovery, RV assist device implantation or heart transplantation.CONCLUSIONSPercutaneous RV mechanical support is feasible, safe and shows acceptable outcome. Early implantation of RV support may contribute to successful outcome after LVAD implantation.     

Computational analysis of an axial flow pediatric ventricular assist device

Longer-term (>2 weeks) mechanical circulatory support will provide an improved quality of life for thousands of pediatric cardiac failure patients per year in the United States. These pediatric patients suffer from severe congenital or acquired heart disease complicated by congestive heart failure. There are currently very few mechanical circulatory support systems available in the United States as viable options for this population. For that reason, we have designed an axial flow pediatric ventricular assist device (PVAD) with an impeller that is fully suspended by magnetic bearings. As a geometrically similar, smaller scaled version of our axial flow pump for the adult population, the PVAD has a design point of 1.5 L/min at 65 mm Hg to meet the full physiologic needs of pediatric patients. Conventional axial pump design equations and a nondimensional scaling technique were used to estimate the PVAD's initial dimensions, which allowed for the creation of computational models for performance analysis. A computational fluid dynamic analysis of the axial flow PVAD, which measures approximately 65 mm in length by 35 mm in diameter, shows that the pump will produce 1.5 L/min at 65 mm Hg for 8000 rpm. Fluid forces (approximately 1 N) were also determined for the suspension and motor design, and scalar stress values remained below 350 Pa with maximum particle residence times of approximately 0.08 milliseconds in the pump. This initial design demonstrated acceptable performance, thereby encouraging prototype manufacturing for experimental validation.     

Left ventricular assist devices in the elderly: Marching forward with cautions

Congestive heart failure is highly prevalent in the elderly population and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been increasingly used in this population. LVAD therapy is more costly than medical treatment but it increases the survival and quality of life of the elderly patients with low disease acuity. Therefore careful selection of candidates and implementation of LVAD therapy earlier in the course of the disease is crucial to improve outcomes. With the technical advances and improvement in clinical management, the financial burden of LVAD therapy in the elderly will become less, making this therapy more economically feasible.     

HeartMate left ventricular assist devices: a multigeneration of implanted blood pumps

The HeartMate family of implanted left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) developed by Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc. (TCI) span a time frame that goes back to the beginning of clinical use of mechanical circulatory support and will stretch well into the foreseeable future. Associated blood pump technology employed in the HeartMates range from an original pusher plate concept to the most advanced rotary pump devices. Starting initially with a pneumatic actuated pusher plate pump, clinical use of the HeartMate I began in 1986. In 1990, electric motor-actuated versions of the HeartMate I began to be used clinically. Presently, the HeartMate I has been implanted in some 2,300 patients worldwide, and this LVAD is a standard by which all others are currently measured. Following the HeartMate I is TCI's next-generation, the HeartMate II, a rotary-pump-based LVAD that uses an axial flow blood pump having blood immersed mechanical bearings. Clinical trials of the HeartMate II were initiated in 2000. The HeartMate III, representing TCI's next-generation LVAD, is structured around a centrifugal blood pump that uses a magnetically levitated rotating assembly. Compared to the HeartMate II, the HeartMate III has the potential for higher overall efficiency. The pump's operating life is not dependent on bearing wear. Given the significantly advanced LVAD technology represented by HeartMates II and III, coupled with the experience of HeartMate I, TCI is well-poised to keep its LVAD products as industry standards in the future.     

Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: the need for an implantable right ventricular assist device

Right ventricular failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device is an unremitting problem. Consideration of portal circulation is important for reversing liver dysfunction and preventing multiple organ failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. To achieve these objectives, it is imperative to maintain the central venous pressure as low as possible. A more positive application of right ventricular assistance is recommended. Implantable pulsatile left ventricular assist devices cannot be used as a right ventricular assist device because of their structure and device size. To improve future prospects, it is necessary to develop an implantable right ventricular assist device based on a rotary blood pump.     

Ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation: the Ottawa experience

This article reports our experience with ventricular assist devices (VADs) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. From 1991 to 2003, a total of 42 patients received a Thoratec VAD (Thoratec Laboratories Corporation Inc., Pleasanton, CA, U.S.A.) (Group T) and 12 patients received a Novacor VAD (WorldHeart Corporation, Ottawa, Canada) (Group N). Thirty Thoratec patients were transplanted compared to six in the Novacor group. Four more Novacor patients are still supported. Of the transplanted patients, 87% survived to hospital discharge in Group T and 67% in Group N. Infections affected 29% and 50% of Group T patients during support and post-transplantation, respectively, compared to 25% and 0%, respectively, in Group N. Neurologic complications affected 33% of patients in each group during support. Reopening rates for bleeding during support were 45% and 42% in Groups T and N, respectively. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. Our study demonstrated the effectiveness of VADs in bridging mortally ill cardiac patients to successful heart transplantation.     

A detailed explantation assessment protocol for patients with left ventricular assist devices with myocardial recovery

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESLeft ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation for end-stage heart failure patients has been on the rise, providing a reliable long-term option. For some LVAD patients, longer term LV unloading leads to recovery; hence, the need for evaluating potential myocardial recovery and weaning eligibility has emerged.METHODSAll patients who underwent contemporary LVAD explantation at our institution between 2009 and 2020 were included in the study. Patients in New York Heart Association I, left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, a cardiac index >2.4 l/min and a peak oxygen intake >50% predicted underwent a 4-phase weaning assessment. A minimally invasive approach using a titanium plug was the surgery of choice in the most recent explants. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate the survival at 1 and 5 years.RESULTSTwenty-six patients (17 HeartMate II, 9 HeartWare) underwent LVAD explantation after a median 317 days of support [IQ (212–518)], range 131–1437. Mean age at explant was 35.8 ± 12.7 years and 85% were males. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy was the underlying diagnosis in 70% of cases. Thirteen (48%) patients were on short-term mechanical circulatory support and 60% required intensive care unit admission prior to the LVAD implantation. At 1 year, Kaplan–Meier estimated survival was 88%, whereas at 6 years, it was 77%. The average left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 year post-explant was 44.25% ± 8.44.CONCLUSIONSThe use of a standardized weaning protocol (echocardiographic and invasive) and a minimally invasive LVAD explant technique minimizes periprocedural complications and leads to good long-term device-free survival rates.