How Accurate Is ICD-10 Coding for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundThe International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) came into effect in October 2015. The new procedural codes (ICD-10-PCS) were designed to specify granular aspects of the procedure, including laterality and revised components. This specificity could improve data collection in institutional databases, large registries, and administrative claims data. Given these possible applications, this study’s purpose was to assess the accuracy of ICD-10-PCS coding for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA).MethodsThis multicenter retrospective analysis utilized the rTKA databases at four academic medical centers for all aseptic rTKAs between October 1, 2015 and July 3, 2019. Operative reports were reviewed to determine laterality and revised components (tibial, femoral, liner, and patellar component), which were then compared with the ICD-10-PCS codes associated with the billing records. Proper coding required both component removal and replacement codes. The correct series of removal and replacement codes was determined using the American Joint Replacement Registry’s guidelines.ResultsIn total, 1906 rTKAs were examined, and 98.0% had at least one proper ICD-10-PCS code, indicating an rTKA had occurred. Coding for components replaced was correct in 76.3% of cases. When examining both removal and replacement codes, accuracy dropped to 57.0%.ConclusionNearly 25% of rTKA procedures were incorrectly coded for replaced components, and over 40% were incorrectly coded for removed and replaced components. ICD-10-PCS codes can accurately identify that an rTKA has occurred; however, the inaccuracy in identifying which specific components were revised should prompt further evaluation of the coding process before utilizing ICD-10-PCS codes to report granular rTKA data.Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective observational analysis.     

ICD-10 Coding Mismatch in Computer and Robotic Assisted Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe International Statistical Classification of Disease, 10^th Revision Procedural Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) is a granular procedural classification system with the ability to precisely classify types of technology utilized in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, coding nuances and the rapidly evolving nature of technology may lead to coding inaccuracies. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of ICD-10-PCS coding in computer-navigated and robotic THA and discuss its implications on clinical data.MethodsThe arthroplasty database at a single institution was retrospectively reviewed for all primary computer and robotic assisted THAs performed between October 2015 to November 2020. The type of technology utilized was determined from the surgical record and compared with the ICD-10-PCS codes applied to each procedure.ResultsA total of 3721 technology-assisted THAs were identified and reviewed. 87.5% of technology-assisted THAs were coded with the correct type of technology. The most common error in computer navigated THA was the omission of the technology code, while the most common error in robotic assisted THA was the designation of codes for both computer navigation and robotic assistance.ConclusionThe granular nature of ICD-10-PCS allows for precise distinction between types of technology-assisted THA. However, rates of coding inaccuracy bring concern for the integrity of this data. The inaccuracy of ICD-10-PCS data is not insignificant and should bring concern for the validity of collective data sets that use it exclusively for its procedural granularity.     

Accuracy of ICD-10 Coding for Femoral Head Bearing Surfaces in Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe International Classification of Diseases-10 Procedure Code System (ICD-10-PCS) introduced oxidized zirconium (OxZi) and niobium procedural codes to the types of femoral head bearing surfaces in 2017. These codes aimed to increase procedural specificity in coding and improve data collection through administrative claims databases. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ICD-10-PCS coding for femoral head bearing surfaces (cobalt chrome/metal, ceramic, and OxZi) in hip procedures.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 6,204 procedures utilizing femoral heads performed between October 1, 2017 and August 26, 2021 at a large, urban academic hospital was conducted. Operative reports and implant logs were queried to determine the femoral head bearing surface, which was used during the total hip arthroplasty. These results were then compared to the ICD-10-PCS codes in the billing records. Coding accuracy was subsequently determined and statistical differences between the three groups were evaluated.ResultsThe ICD-10-PCS coding was accurate for 90.8% (5,634/6,204) of cases. Coding accuracy for ceramic femoral heads (95.4%, 4,171/4,371) was significantly greater than that of both cobalt chrome/metal (73.7%, 606/822; P < .001) and OxZi (84.8%, 857/1,011; P < .001) femoral heads.ConclusionWhile coding for ceramic femoral heads was very accurate, OxZi and cobalt chrome/metal femoral heads were miscoded at a rate of approximately 20%. These inaccuracies call for further evaluation of the ICD-10-PCS coding process to ensure that conclusions drawn from clinical research performed through administrative claims databases are not subject to error.     

Defining radical cystectomy using the ICD-10 procedure coding system

IntroductionThe International Classification of Diseases-10-Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) is markedly more complex than the preceding ICD-9 system, which has increased the difficulty of identifying radical cystectomy (RC) in administrative datasets. Given the absence of a consensus code definition for RC, we sought to develop and internally validate a list of ICD-10-PCS codes for RC.Materials and methodsAll RCs performed from January 2019 to December 2020 were identified from our prospectively maintained registries and split into training (2019) and validation (2020) cohorts. A list of candidate ICD-10-PCS codes to identify RC were compiled using an online ICD-9 to ICD-10 converter. Codes were used to identify RCs from hospital billing data and referenced against registry cases in the training cohort; when discrepancies were found, the working ICD-10 code definition was iteratively revised. Accuracy of the consensus code list was verified in the validation cohort.ResultsWe identified 459 RCs over the study period, including 225 in 2019 and 234 in 2020. In the training cohort, our codes identified 241 procedures, including 222 of 225 (99%) RCs performed for bladder cancer. Misidentified cases included 15 (6.2%) RCs for benign disease or nonurologic cancers and 4 (1.7%) non-RC cases. In the validation cohort we identified 239 cases, including 227 of 234 (97%) RCs for bladder cancer and 12 (5%) RCs for benign disease or nonurologic cancers.ConclusionGiven high fidelity to actual procedures performed, this list of ICD-10-PCS codes may be useful for researchers seeking to identify RC within administrative datasets.     

The Impact of Transitioning From International Classification of Diseases,Ninth Revision to International Classification of Diseases,Tenth Revision on Reported Complication Rates Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIn 2015, the healthcare system transitioned from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding to the Tenth Revision (ICD-10). We sought to determine the effect of this change on the reported incidence of complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsThe Humana administrative claims database was queried from 2 years prior to October 1, 2015 (ICD-9 cohort) and for 1 year after this date (ICD-10 cohort) to identify all TKA procedures. Complications occurring within 6 months of surgery were captured using the respective coding systems. Incidence of each complication was compared between cohorts using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsThere were 19,009 TKAs in the ICD-10 cohort and 38,172 TKAs in the ICD-9 cohort. The incidence of each complication analyzed was significantly higher in the ICD-9 cohort relative to the ICD-10 cohort. Periprosthetic joint infection occurred in 1.9% vs 1.3% (RR 1.5, 1.3-1.9), loosening in 0.3% vs 0.1% (RR 2.7, 1.8-4.9), periprosthetic fracture in 0.3% vs 0.1% (RR 3.0, 1.6-4.5), and other mechanical complications in 0.7% vs 0.4% (RR 2.0, 1.5-2.5) (P < .05 for all).ConclusionThe transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 coding has altered the reported incidence of complications following TKA. These results are likely due to the added complexity of ICD-10 which is joint and laterality specific. It is important to understand the differences between coding systems as this data is used for quality initiatives, risk adjustment models, and clinical research. Thoughtful methodology will be necessary when ICD-9 and ICD-10 data are being analyzed simultaneously.     

Dual Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Efficient Strategy to Decrease Dislocation Risk

BackgroundRevision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is a challenging surgery with a higher rate of complications than primary arthroplasty, particularly instability and aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study is to compare dual mobility cup (DMC) and standard mobility cup (SMC) in all rTHAs performed at our institution over a decade with a 1 year minimum follow-up.MethodsTwo hundred ninety-five rTHAs (acetabular only and bipolar revisions) between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. These were divided into those with a DMC (184 revisions) or SMC (111 revisions). Dislocation and complications requiring re-revision were reported.ResultsThe rTHA mean age was 69 years ± 13.9 (19-92) and the mean follow-up was 2.3 years. Dislocation risk was statistically lower (P = .01) with a DMC (3.8%; 7/184) than with an SMC (13.5%; 15/111). DMC required re-rTHA in 24/184 (13%) for any reason compared to SMC in 19/111 (17.1%) (P = .34). There was no significant difference in early aseptic loosening (P = .28) between the 2 groups. For young patients (≤55 years), results were similar with a lower dislocation rate in the DMC group (P = .24) and no increased risk of early aseptic loosening (P = .49).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that for all rTHA indications DMC compared to SMC has a significantly decreased risk of postoperative dislocation without risk of early aseptic loosening at medium term follow-up. The use of DMC in rTHA is an important consideration particularly with the predicted increased incidence of both primary and revision THA globally.     

Low-Dose Aspirin Is Safe and Effective for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundCurrently, there is no established universal standard of care for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) in orthopedic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The aim of this study is to determine whether a protocol of 81-mg aspirin (ASA) bis in die (BID) is safe and/or effective in preventing VTE in patients undergoing rTHAs vs 325-mg ASA BID.MethodsIn 2017, a large academic medical center adopted a new protocol for VTE prophylaxis in arthroplasty patients at standard risk. Initially, patients received 325-mg ASA BID but switched to 81-mg ASA BID. A retrospective review (2011-2019) was performed to identify 1361 consecutive rTHA patients and their associated 90-day postoperative complications such as VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), as the primary outcome; and gastrointestinal and wound bleeding, acute periprosthetic joint infection, and mortality as the secondary outcome.ResultsFrom 2011 to 2017, 973 rTHAs were performed and 13 total VTE cases were diagnosed (1.34%). From 2017 to 2019, 388 rTHAs were performed with 3 total VTE cases identified (0.77%). Chi-squared analyses and logistic regression models showed no differences in rates or odds in postoperative PE (P = .09), DVT (P = .79), PE and DVT (P = .85), and total VTE (P = .38) using either dose. There were also no differences between bleeding complications (P = .14), infection rate (P = .46), and mortality (P = .53).ConclusionUsing a protocol of 81-mg of ASA BID is noninferior to 325-mg ASA BID and may be safe and effective in maintaining low rates of VTE in patients undergoing rTHA.     

Septic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Adequately Compensated by Work Relative Value Units

BackgroundPerforming revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) for periprosthetic joint infection is complex and may require greater time and resources than aseptic revision cases. Work relative value units (RVUs) assigned may not reflect the difference in actual work required for septic revision hip cases. The purpose of this study is to compare the work effort between aseptic and septic revision hip cohorts, and determine if physicians are appropriately compensated.MethodsData were collected through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the years 2005 to 2018 to identify all aseptic rTHA cases and septic rTHA cases. Work RVU, operation time, RVU per minute, and dollars per minute were assessed between the aseptic and septic revision hip cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for the study.ResultsThe mean operation times for aseptic and septic rTHAs were 146.12 and 173.24 minutes, respectively (P < .001). This resulted in an RVU per minute of 0.257 for the aseptic revision hip cohort compared to 0.212 for the septic cohort (P < .001). Aseptic rTHA cases were valued higher with a dollars per minute of 9.28, whereas septic rTHA cases were 7.65 (P < .001).ConclusionAlthough rTHA for infection is more complex and requires longer mean operative time than aseptic rTHA, physicians are not appropriately reimbursed for this challenging procedure. This inadequate RVU-based reimbursement for septic rTHA may deter physicians from performing these procedures, which could lead to decreased access to care for patients in need of rTHA for infection.     

ICD-10 codes do not accurately reflect ankle fracture injury patterns

ObjectiveTo determine the accuracy of International Classification of Disease Version 10 (ICD-10) coding for ankle fracture injury patterns.DesignRetrospective cohort studyPatients97 adult patients with fractures about the ankle (rotational ankle fracture or distal tibia fracture) from 2016 to 2020, selected by stratified random sampling.InterventionAssignment of an ICD-10 code representative of a rotational ankle fracture, pilon fracture, or unspecified fracture of the lower leg.Outcome measurementsInjury radiographs were reviewed by three authors to determine the correct code. Agreement between the correct code and the electronic medical record (EMR) assigned code was determined using kappa's statistic in the aggregate as well as percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) between individual codes.Results59 of 97 cases (60.8%) demonstrated discordance between the existing EMR and surgeon-assigned codes. Aggregate agreement between all codes was fair (K = 0.26). Lateral malleolus fracture codes demonstrated the highest PPV (0.91, 95% CI 0.72–0.99), while the lowest PPV was found for “other fractures of the lower leg” (0.05, 95% CI 0.0–0.24) and “other fracture of the fibula” (0.0, 95% CI 0.0–0.15). Generalized “other fracture” codes comprised 45% of EMR codes compared to only 6% of assigned codes (p < 0.001). EMR codes were specific but not sensitive.ConclusionThere is substantial discordance between existing EMR and surgeon-assigned ICD-10 codes for ankle fractures. Database research that relies on ICD-10 coding as a surrogate for primary clinical data should be interpreted with caution and institutions should make efforts to increase the accuracy of their coding.     

Not all Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Are the Same: What Are the Implications in Large Database Studies?

BackgroundThe use of claims databases for research after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) has increased exponentially. These studies rely on accurate coding, and inadvertent inclusion of patients with nonroutine indications may influence results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complexity of THA and TKA captured by CPT code and determine if complication rates vary based on the indication.MethodsThe NSQIP database was queried using CPT codes 21730 and 27447 to identify patients undergoing THA and TKA from 2018 to 2019. The surgical indication was classified based on the ICD-10 diagnosis code as routine primary, complex primary, inflammatory, fracture, oncologic, revision, infection, or indeterminant. Patient factors and 30-day complications, readmission, reoperation, and wound complications were compared.ResultsA total of 86,009 THA patients had 703 ICD-10 diagnosis codes and 91.4% were routine primary indications. Complication rates were: routine primary 7.4%, complex primary 11.3%, inflammatory 12.5%, fracture 23.9%, oncologic 32.4%, revision 26.9%, infection 38.7%, and indeterminant 10.3% (P < .0001). 137,500 TKA patients had 552 ICD-10 diagnosis codes and 96.1% were routine primary cases. Complication rates were: routine primary 5.9%, complex primary 8.0%, inflammatory 7.2%, fracture 38.9%, oncologic 32.7%, revision 13.3%, infection 37.7%, and indeterminant 9.6% (P < .0001). Routine primary arthroplasty had significantly lower rates of reoperation, readmission, and wound complications.ConclusionUsing CPT code alone captures 10% of THA and 4% of TKA patients with procedures for nonroutine primary indications. It is essential to recognize identification of patients simply by CPT code has the potential to inadvertently introduce bias, and surgeons should critically assess methods used to define the study populations.     

Severe Obesity Increases Risk of Infection After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe increasing prevalence of obesity has resulted in an increased number of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs) performed in patients with a high body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether obesity negatively affects (1) complication rate, (2) reoperation and revision rate, and (3) patient-reported outcome in rTHA.MethodsIn this registry-based study, we prospectively followed 444 rTHAs (cup: n = 265, stem: n = 57, both: n = 122) performed in a specialized high-volume orthopedic center between 2013 and 2015. The number of complications, and reoperation and revision surgery was registered until 5 years postoperatively. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was evaluated preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were categorized based on BMI to nonobese (<30 kg/m², n = 328), obese (30-35 kg/m², n = 82), and severe obese (≥35 kg/m², n = 34).ResultsSevere obese patients, but not obese patients, had higher risks of complications and re-revision than nonobese patients. In particular, the risk of infection following rTHA was higher in severe obese patients (24%) compared to nonobese patients (3%; relative risk, 7.7). Severe obese patients had overall poorer OHS than nonobese patients, but improvement in OHS did not differ between severe obese and nonobese patients. No differences between obese and nonobese groups on OHS were observed.ConclusionIn our study, severe obesity was associated with an increased risk of infection following rTHA. Patients with high BMI should be counseled appropriately before surgery.     

Surgeons Experience More Physiologic Stress and Strain During Revision Than Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) procedures are more complex than primary TKA and THA, but their physiologic burden to the surgeon has not been quantified. While rTKA and rTHA have longer operative times, it is unknown whether differences exist in stress and strain compared to primary TKA and primary THA. The study was conducted to elicit whether differences exist in surgeon physiological response while performing rTKA and rTKA compared to primary TKA and primary THA.MethodsWe evaluated a prospective cohort study of 70 consecutive cases (23 primary TKAs, 12 primary THAs, 16 rTKAs, and 19 rTHAs). Two high-volume fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons wore a smart vest that recorded cardiorespiratory data while performing primary THA, primary TKA, rTHA, and rTKA. Heart rate (beats/minute), stress index (correlates with sympathetic activation), respiratory rate (respirations/minute), minute ventilation (L/min), and energy expenditure (Calories) were collected for every case, along with patient body mass index (kilograms/meter²) and working operative time (minutes). T-tests were used to assess for differences between the two groups.ResultsCompared to primary TKA, performing rTKAs had a significantly higher surgeon stress index (17 versus 15; P = .035), heart rate (104 versus 99; P = .007), energy expenditure per case (409 versus 297; P = .002), and a significantly lower heart rate variability (11 versus 12; P = .006). Compared to primary THA, performing rTHA had a significantly higher energy expenditure per case (431 versus 307; P = .007) and trended towards having a higher surgeon stress index (16 versus 14; P = .272) and a lower heart rate variability (11 versus 12; P = .185), although it did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionSurgeons experience higher physiological stress and strain when performing rTKA and rTHA compared to primary TKA and primary THA. This study provides objective data on what many surgeons feel and should promote further research on the specific stress and strain felt by surgeons who perform revision arthroplasty procedures.     

Time Required for Planned and Unplanned Episodes of Care in Septic Two-Stage Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundSeptic revision total hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasty requires more effort but is reimbursed less than primary procedures per minute of intraoperative time. This study quantified planned and unplanned work performed by the surgical team for septic 2-stage revision surgeries during the entire episode-of-care “reimbursement window” and compared that time to allowable reimbursement amounts.MethodsBetween October 2010 and December 2020 all unilateral septic 2-stage rTHA and rTKA procedures performed by a single surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Time dedicated to planned work was calculated over each episode of care, from surgery scheduling to 90 days postoperatively. Impromptu patient inquiries and treatments after discharge, but within the episode of care, involving the surgeon/surgeon team constituted unplanned work. Planned and unplanned work minutes were summed and divided by the number of patients reviewed to obtain average minutes of work per patient.ResultsSixty-eight hips and 64 knees were included. For 2-stage rTHA and rTKA the average time per patient for planned care was 1728 and 1716 minutes and for unplanned care was 339 and 237 minutes. Compared to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ allowable reimbursement times, an additional 799 and 887 minutes of uncompensated time was required to care for 2-stage rTHA and rTKA patients.ConclusionTwo-stage revision procedures are substantially more complex than primary procedures. Financially disincentivizing surgeons to care for these patients reduces access to care when high-quality care is most needed. These findings support increasing the allowable times for 2-stage septic revision cases.     

Limitations of administrative databases in spine research: a study in obesity

Background contextThe use of national inpatient databases for spine surgery research has been increasing. Unfortunately, without firsthand knowledge of each specific database, it can be difficult to judge the validity of such studies. Large databases that rely on administrative data, such as International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, may misrepresent patient information and could thus affect the results of studies that use these data.PurposeThe present study uses obesity, an easily quantified and objective variable, as an example comorbidity to assess the accuracy of ICD-9 codes in the setting of their continued use in spine database studies.Study design/settingA cross-sectional study at a large academic medical center.Patient sampleAll patients spending at least one night in the hospital as an inpatient between April 1, 2013 and April 16, 2013. Obstetrics and gynecology, psychiatry, and pediatric patients were excluded.Outcome measuresProportion of patients for whom ICD-9 obesity diagnosis codes assigned at hospital discharge match chart-documented body mass index (BMI).MethodsThe medical record was reviewed for each patient, and obesity ICD-9 codes were directly compared with documented BMI.ResultsThe study included 2,075 patients. Of 573 “obese” patients (calculated BMI 30–39.9), only 109 received the correct code (278.00), giving this ICD-9 code a sensitivity of 0.19. Of 174 “morbidly obese” patients (calculated BMI >40), only 84 received the correct code (278.01), giving this ICD-9 code a sensitivity of 0.48.ConclusionsUsing obesity as an example, this study highlights the potential errors inherent to using ICD-9–coded databases for spine surgery research. Should a study based on such data use “obesity” as a variable in any analyses, the reader should interpret these results with caution. We further suggest that obesity is likely not the only comorbidity to which these results apply. As database research continues to represent an increasing proportion of publications in the field of spine surgery, it is important to realize that study outcomes can be skewed by data accuracy, and, thus, should not be blindly accepted simply by virtue of large sample sizes.     

Health informatics and the importance of coding

Health informatics can be defined as ‘The knowledge, skills and tools which enable information to be collected, managed, used and shared, to support the delivery of healthcare and to promote health.’ The use of computers in informatics requires standardized codes to identify synonymous medical terms. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, (ICD-10) is used internationally to code morbidity and mortality; the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures, 4th revision, (OPCS-4) is used in the UK to code operations and procedures; Read codes and Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) are used in primary care systems. Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terminology (SNOMED CT) incorporates all these coding systems. ICD-10 and OPCS-4 are fundamental to Payment by Results, the method by which healthcare providers in the NHS in England are paid.     

Preoperative Depression Is Associated With Increased Risk Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe incidence of revision total hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasty continues to increase. Preoperative depression is known to influence outcomes following primary arthroplasty. Despite this, it remains unknown whether the same relationship exists for patients undergoing revision procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to investigate this relationship.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing rTHA and rTKA were identified from the Truven MarketScan database. Patients with a diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection were excluded. Two cohorts were created: those with preoperative depression and those without. We included patients who were enrolled in the database for 1 year preoperatively and postoperatively. Demographic and complication data were collected, and statistical analysis was then performed comparing complications between cohorts.ResultsA total of 10,017 patients undergoing rTHA and 13,973 patients undergoing rTKA were included in this study. Of these, 1305 (13.1%) and 2012 (14.4%) had depression, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that, after rTHA, preoperative depression was associated with extended length of stay, nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department visit, prosthetic joint infection, revision surgery, and increased costs (P < .001). Similarly, following rTKA, depression was associated with extended length of stay, nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department visit, revision surgery, and increased costs (P < .001).ConclusionDepression before revision total joint arthroplasty is common and is associated with increased risk of complication and increased healthcare resource utilization following both rTHA and rTKA. Further research will be needed to delineate to what degree this represents a modifiable risk factor.     

The reliability of the ICD-AIS map in identifying serious road traffic injuries from the Helsinki Trauma Registry

ObjectiveThe EU has recommended that its member countries compile statistics on the number of serious road traffic injuries. In Finland, the number of seriously injured road traffic patients is assessed using the International Classification of Diseases, 10^th Revision (ICD-10) and the automatic conversion tool (ICD-AIS map) developed by The Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). The aim of this study was to assess how reliably the ICD-AIS map identifies both serious injuries and seriously injured patients due to road traffic accidents.MethodsData was derived from the Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR) and included 215 severe (New Injury Severity Score >15) trauma patients injured in road traffic accidents from the years 2016 and 2017. The severity ratings of injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale, AIS 3+) and patients (Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale, MAIS 3+) were determined by direct AIS coding of the HTR and were also generated by the ICD-AIS map based on ICD-10 injury codes. These two ratings were compared by injury mechanism and Injury Severity Score (ISS) body regions. The strength of agreement was described using Cohen’s κ. The most common injury codes with errors in severity rating by the ICD-AIS map were presented.ResultsThe number of seriously injured patients by the ICD-AIS map was 21% lower, and the number of serious injuries was 36% lower than the corresponding numbers by direct coding. The exact agreement of the injury ratings was 72% (κ = 0.44, 95% CI 0.42–0.46). Most of the conversion errors were due to the simplicity of the ICD-10 codes used in Finland compared to those used in the ICD-AIS map (ICD-10-CM) and the missing codes from the ICD-AIS map. The most frequent misclassifications were due to multiple rib fractures, visceral organ injuries, some open fractures of extremities, and specific head injuries. Missing codes were most common in face, chest, and limb injuries.ConclusionsThe ICD-10 injury codes presently used in Finland should be more specific to permit reliable conversion results by the ICD-AIS map. The problem with missing codes should be considered more closely. When implementing the ICD-11, all detailed injury codes should be introduced.     

Impact of Indication for Revision THA on Resource Utilization

BackgroundDemographic variables play an important role in outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Surgical and in-patient variables as well as outcomes vary between indications for rTHA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the indication for the rTHA on costs and postoperative outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort analysis investigated all patients who underwent unilateral, aseptic rTHA at an academic orthopaedic specialty hospital who had at least 1-year postoperative follow-up. In total, 654 patients were evaluated and categorized based on their indication for aseptic rTHA. Demographics, direct and total procedure costs, surgical factors, postoperative outcomes, and re-revision rates were collected and compared between indications.ResultsYounger patients had the greatest leg length discrepancy (LLD) and older patients had the highest incidence of periprosthetic fracture (PPF) (P = .001). The greatest proportion of full revisions were found for LLD (16.7%) and head/polyethylene liner-only revisions for metallosis/adverse tissue reaction (100%). Operative time was significantly longest for LLD revisions and shortest for metallosis/adverse tissue reaction revisions (P < .001). Length of stay was longest for periprosthetic fracture and shortest for LLD and stiffness/heterotopic ossification (P < .001). Re-revision rate was greatest for implant failure and lowest for LLD. Total cost was highest for PPF (148.9%) and lowest for polyethylene liner wear (87.7%).ConclusionsPatients undergoing rTHA for indications such as PPF and aseptic loosening were associated with longer operative times, length of stay and higher total and direct costs. Therefore, they may need increased perioperative attention with respect to resource utilization, risk stratification, surgical planning, and cost-reducing measures.Level III EvidenceRetrospective Cohort Study.     

Uncommon combinations of ICD10-PCS or ICD-9-CM operative procedure codes account for most inpatient surgery at half of Texas hospitals

Study objectiveRecently, there has been interest in activity-based cost accounting for inpatient surgical procedures to facilitate “value based” analyses. Research 10–20 years ago, performed using data from 3 large teaching hospitals, found that activity-based cost accounting was practical and useful for modeling surgeons and subspecialties, but inaccurate for individual procedures. We hypothesized that these older results would apply to hundreds of hospitals, currently evaluable using administrative databases.DesignObservational study.SettingState of Texas hospital discharge abstract data for 1st quarter of 2016, 4th quarter of 2015, 1st quarter of 2015, and 4th quarter of 2014.PatientsDischarged from an acute care hospital in Texas with at least 1 major therapeutic (“operative”) procedure.MeasurementsCounts of discharges for each procedure or combination of procedures, classified by ICD-10-PCS or ICD-9-CM.Main resultsAt the average hospital, most surgical discharges were for procedures performed at most once a month at the hospital (54%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 51% to 55%). At the average hospital, approximately 90% of procedures were performed at most once a month at the hospital (93%, CI 93% to 94%). The percentages were insensitive to the quarter of the year. The percentages were 3% to 6% greater with ICD-10-PCS than for the superseded ICD 9 CM.ConclusionsThere are many different procedure codes, and many different combinations of codes, relative to the number of different hospital discharges. Since most procedures at most hospitals are performed no more than once a month, activity-based cost accounting with a sample size sufficient to be useful is impractical for the vast majority of procedures, in contrast to analysis by surgeon and/or subspecialty.     

Increased use of enoxaparin in pediatric trauma patients

PurposeVenous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric trauma patients has been reported from 0.7 to 4.2 patients per 1000 admissions. There are no clear guidelines for prophylactic anticoagulation in children. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of enoxaparin in pediatric trauma patients.MethodsThe Pediatric Health Information System database was queried from 2001 to 2008 for patients 0 to 18 years with a primary diagnosis of trauma based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. Patients who received enoxaparin and/or diagnosed with VTE were identified using pharmacy and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. Logistic regression was used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with VTE and enoxaparin use.ResultsAmong 260,078 pediatric trauma patients, 3195 were prescribed enoxaparin (1.23%), 2915 (1.12%) of whom were given enoxaparin without a diagnosis of VTE. The incidence of VTE remained stable (0.23%-0.28%), whereas the use of enoxaparin increased (0.75%-1.54%), especially in patients without VTE (0.65%-1.43%). Venous thromboembolism was significantly associated with pelvic fractures, intensive care unit stay, and central venous catheters (P = .017, P < .001, P < .001).ConclusionsDespite a stable VTE incidence, the use of enoxaparin significantly increased in pediatric trauma patients, suggesting that use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is increasing in pediatric trauma centers.