Plasma Fibrin Degradation Product and D-Dimer Are of Limited Value for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundAlthough the Musculoskeletal Infection Society introduced the use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as inflammatory markers for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), no single blood marker reliably detects infection before revision arthroplasty. We therefore posed 2 questions: (1) Are fibrin degradation product (FDP) and D-dimer of value for diagnosing PJI before revision arthroplasty? (2) What are their sensitivity and specificity for that purpose?MethodsTo answer these questions, we retrospectively enrolled 318 patients (129 with PJI [group A], 189 with aseptic mechanical failure [group B]) who underwent revision arthroplasty during 2013-2018. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine maximum sensitivity and specificity of the 2 markers. Inflammatory and fibrinolytic markers were evaluated based on (1) the Tsukayama-type infection present and (2) the 3 most common PJI-related pathogens.ResultsFDP and D-dimer levels were higher in group A than in group B: 4.97 ± 2.83 vs 4.14 ± 2.67 mg/L and 2.14 ± 2.01 vs 1.51 ± 1.37 mg/L fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU), respectively (both P < .05). Based on the Youden index, 2.95 mg/L and 1.02 mg/L FEU are the optimal FDP and D-dimer predictive cutoffs, respectively, for diagnosing PJI. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 65.12% and 60.33% (FDP) and 68.29% and 50.70% (D-dimer). ESR, CRP, and interleukin-6 values were diagnostically superior to those of FDP and D-dimer.ConclusionThe value of plasma FDP and D-dimer for diagnosing PJI is limited compared with traditional inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP, interleukin-6) before revision arthroplasty.     

Comparison of a Comprehensive Set of Fibrinolytic Markers With C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundThe diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), a serious complication after primary total joint arthroplasty, remains challenging. Recently, fibrinolytic activities have been shown to be closely related to infections and inflammation. However, data assessing the value of fibrinolytic markers for the diagnosis of PJI have been sparse until now.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 157 patients undergoing revision for aseptic loosening (n = 106, group A) or revision for chronic PJI (n = 51, group B) from January 2014 to August 2019. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, fibrin degradation product (FDP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. The diagnostic values of each biomarker were analyzed and compared using receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, and specificity.ResultsCompared with group A, group B had significantly higher levels of CRP, ESR, D-dimer, FDP, and fibrinogen (P < .001). The area under the curve of fibrinogen was 0.914, which was slightly lower than that of CRP (0.924). FDP and D-dimer had area under the curve values of 0.808 and 0.784, respectively. The optimal threshold, sensitivity, and specificity were 3.56 g/L, 86.27%, and 83.96% for fibrinogen; 1.22 mg/L, 66.67%, and 85.85% for D-dimer; and 3.98 μg/mL, 72.55%, and 80.19% for FDP, respectively.ConclusionFibrinolytic markers provided promising diagnostic support for PJI, especially fibrinogen, which had a diagnostic efficiency similar to that of CRP and ESR.     

Synovial Fluid Viscosity Test is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundSo far there is no “gold standard” test for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), compelling clinicians to rely on several serological and synovial fluid tests with no 100% accuracy. Synovial fluid viscosity is one of the parameters defining the rheology properties of synovial fluid. We hypothesized that patients with PJI may have a different level of synovial fluid viscosity and aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid viscosity in detecting PJI.MethodsThis prospective study was initiated to enroll patients undergoing primary and revision arthroplasty. Our cohort consisted of 45 patients undergoing revision for PJI (n = 15), revision for aseptic failure (n = 15), and primary arthroplasty (n = 15). PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. In all patients, synovial fluid viscosity, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plasma d-dimer levels were measured preoperatively.ResultsThe synovial fluid viscosity level was significantly lower (P = .0011) in patients with PJI (7.93 mPa·s, range 3.0-15.0) than in patients with aseptic failure (13.11 mPa·s, range 6.3-20.4). Using Youden’s index, 11.80 mPa·s was determined as the optimal threshold value for synovial fluid viscosity for the diagnosis of PJI. Synovial fluid viscosity outperformed CRP, ESR, and plasma d-dimer, with a sensitivity of 93.33% and a specificity of 66.67%.ConclusionSynovial fluid viscosity seems to be on the same level of accuracy with CRP, ESR, and d-dimer regarding PJI detection and to be a promising marker for the diagnosis of PJI.     

Diagnostic Utility and Thresholds for Commonly Obtained Serum and Synovial Markers Prior to Reimplantation in Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundAccurate diagnosis of persistent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) during 2-stage exchange remains a challenge. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance and thresholds of several commonly obtained serum and synovial markers to better guide reimplantation timing.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of 249 patients who underwent 2-stage exchange with antibiotic spacers for PJI. Serum and synovial markers analyzed included white blood cell (WBC) count, polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Serum markers analyzed were erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), as well as percentage change in ESR and CRP from initial diagnosis to reimplantation. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy of detecting PJI.ResultsIn TKAs, synovial ANC and WBC had the highest AUCs (0.76), with thresholds of 2,952 and 3,800 cells/μL, respectively. The next best marker was serum CRP (0.73) with a threshold of 5.2 mg/dL. In THAs, serum CRP had the highest AUC (0.84) with a threshold of 4.3 mg/dL, followed by synovial PMN% (0.80) with a threshold of 77%. Percentage change in serum ESR or CRP provided low diagnostic value overall.ConclusionRegarding serum markers, CRP consistently performed well in detecting persistent PJI in patients with antibiotic spacers. Absolute values of serum CRP and ESR had better diagnostic value than trends for guiding reimplantation timing. Diagnostic performance differed with joint type; however, synovial markers outperformed serum counterparts. No marker alone can be utilized to diagnose residual PJI in these patients, and further work is needed in this domain.     

Plasma D-dimer Does Not Anticipate the Fate of Reimplantation in Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Preliminary Investigation

BackgroundInflammatory markers such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have always been a part of the diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but they perform poorly anticipating the outcome of reimplantation. D-dimer has been reported in a small series as a potential marker to measure infection control after single-stage revisions to treat PJI. Nonetheless, its use to confirm infection control and decide the proper timing of reimplantation remains uncertain.Questions/purposes(1) What is the best diagnostic threshold and accuracy values for plasma D-dimer levels compared with other inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP) or what varying combinations of these tests are associated with persistent infection after reimplantation? (2) Do D-dimer values above this threshold, ESR, CRP, and varying test combinations at the time of reimplantation indicate an increased risk of subsequent persistent infection after reimplantation?MethodsWe retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of all 53 patients who had two-stage revisions for PJI and who underwent plasma D-dimer testing before reimplantation at one of two academic institutions from November 22, 2017 to December 5, 2020. During that period, all patients undergoing two-stage revisions also had a D-dimer test drawn. The minimum follow-up duration was 1 year. We are reporting at this early interval (rather than the more typical 2-year time point) because of the poorer-than-expected performance of this diagnostic test. Of these 53 patients, 17% (9) were lost to follow-up before 1 year and could not be analyzed; the remaining 44 patients (17 hips and 27 knees) were studied here. The mean follow-up was 503 ± 135 days. Absence or persistence of infection after reimplantation were defined according to the Delphi criteria. The conditions included in these criteria were: (1) control of infection, as characterized by a healed wound without fistula, drainage, or pain; (2) no subsequent surgical intervention owing to infection after reimplantation; and (3) no occurrence of PJI-related mortality. The absence of any of the aforementioned conditions until the final follow-up examination was deemed a persistent infection after reimplantation. Baseline patient characteristics were not different between patients with persistent infection (n = 10) and those with absence of it after reimplantation (n = 34) as per the Delphi criteria. Baseline patient characteristics evaluated were age, gender, self-reported race (white/Black/other) or ethnicity (nonHispanic/Hispanic), BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, smoking status(smoker/nonsmoker), and joint type (hip/knee). The optimal D-dimer threshold to differentiate between persistence of infection or not after reimplantation was calculated using the Youden index. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to test the accuracy of D-dimer, ESR, CRP, and their combinations to establish associations, if any, with persistent infection after reimplantation. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (free of infection after reimplantation) with a log-rank test was performed to investigate if D-dimer, ESR, and CRP were associated with absence of infection after reimplantation. Survival or being free of infection after reimplantation was determined as per Delphi criteria. Alpha was set at p < 0.05.ResultsIn the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with an area under the curve of 0.62, D-dimer showed low accuracy and did not anticipate persistent infection after reimplantation. The optimal D-dimer threshold differentiating between persistence of infection or not after reimplantation was 3070 ng/mL. When using this threshold, D-dimer demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 55.5% to 99.7%) and negative predictive value of 94% (95% CI 70.7% to 99.1%), but low specificity (47% [95% CI 29.8% to 64.9%]) and positive predictive value (33% [95% CI 25.5% to 42.2%]). Although D-dimer showed the highest sensitivity, the combination of D-dimer with ESR and CRP showed the highest specificity (91% [95% CI 75.6% to 98%]) defining the persistence of infection after reimplantation. Based on plasma D-dimer levels, with the numbers available, there was no difference in survival free from infection after reimplantation (Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from infection at minimum 1 year in patients with D-dimer below 3070 ng/mL versus survivorship free from infection with D-dimer above 3070 ng/mL: 749 days [95% CI 665 to 833 days] versus 615 days [95% CI 471 to 759 days]; p = 0.052). Likewise, there were no associations between high ESR and CRP levels and persistent infection after reimplantation, but the number of events was very small, and insufficient power is a concern with this analysis.ConclusionIn this preliminary series, with the numbers available, D-dimer alone had poor accuracy and was not associated with survival free from infection after reimplantation in patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty. D-dimer alone might be used to establish that PJI is unlikely, and the combination of D-dimer, ESR, and CRP should be considered to confirm PJI diagnosis in the setting of reimplantation.Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic study.     

Serum Fibrinogen Test Performs Well for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundSerum fibrinogen (FIB) is an acute-phase glycoprotein in the infection response that may stop excessive bleeding. The purposes of this study are to determine the value of FIB that can be used to differentiate between periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis, and to determine the clinical significance of FIB for analyzing infection outcomes after first-stage surgery.MethodsThis retrospective study included 90 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty revision from January 2015 to August 2019. PJI was confirmed in 53 patients (group A), and the other 37 patients were diagnosed with aseptic loosening of the prosthesis (group B). Only 21 patients in group A documented the results for serum FIB, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after spacer insertion, so the postoperative serological marker levels of the these patients were also assessed.ResultsThe FIB, CRP, and ESR levels were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for FIB at 0.928. Analyses of FIB levels revealed a sensitivity of 79.25% and a specificity of 94.59%. FIB levels were significantly lower in patients with PJI after spacer insertion (P < .001).ConclusionFIB is an adequate test to aid in diagnosing PJI, and it is not inferior to CRP and ESR in distinguishing between PJI and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. It is an especially useful tool in assessing infection outcomes after first-stage surgery.     

Do Pre-Reimplantation Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate/C-Reactive Protein Cutoffs Guide Decision-Making in Prosthetic Joint Infection? Are We Flying Blind?

BackgroundTwo-stage exchange is a commonly used approach for treating chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). A pre-reimplantation threshold value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to determine infection eradication and the proper timing of reimplantation remains ill-defined.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 483 potential patients for eligibility. In total, 178 patients were excluded. In addition, 305 joints were eligible who underwent 2-stage revision for prosthetic hip or knee joint infection (PJI). Serum ESR and CRP were recorded at 8 weeks post resection prior to stage 2 reimplantation. ESR and CRP were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for response failure.ResultsIn total, 252 patients had resections for chronic infections while 53 septic patients had resections for acute infections. Forty-one of 252 (16.3%) patients failed reimplantation. Median ESR at the time of reimplantation was 17 (normal less than 20 mm/h). Median CRP was 0.6 (normal less than 0.5 mg/dL). ROC plot for response failure in analyzing ESR found an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.47. ROC plot analyzing CRP found an AUC of 0.57. The ratio of ESR/CRP was also utilized and found an AUC of 0.60. All of the AUC data are in the “fail to discriminate category.”ConclusionAlthough improvements in serology can be somewhat reassuring, there are no statistically significant values of ESR or CRP that would predict failure of reimplantation in the 2-stage treatment of PJI. Because we are flying blind consideration should be made for mandatory pre-reimplantation aspirates.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Retrospective Case Series.     

Plasma Viscosity Has a Role in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging because no single test has consistently demonstrated an adequate discriminative potential. The combination of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) with adequate thresholds is well established. This study sought to investigate the role of plasma viscosity (PV) in the diagnosis of PJI following painful total knee arthroplasty.MethodsThe medical notes, and hematological and microbiology results of 310 patients who underwent revision for a painful total knee arthroplasty were evaluated. Infection was confirmed using Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria in 102 patients (32.9%), whereas 208 patients (67.1%) were classified as noninfected. Serum investigations including ESR, CRP, and PV were analyzed using receiver observer curves and optimal cutoff points identified.ResultsThere was a strong correlation between PV and both ESR and CRP. The area under curve was 0.814 for PV and 0.812 for ESR. Statistical analysis showed noninferiority of PV as compared to ESR in diagnosing PJI. A PV value of ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. had the best efficiency of 82.1%. Combining a CRP ≥ 13.5 mg/L with a PV ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. in a serial test approach yielded the highest specificity of 97.9% and positive likelihood ratio of 22.8. Sensitivity was 47.9% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.53.ConclusionPV is noninferior to ESR in diagnosing PJI. Its use is justified in clinical practice. It is cheaper, quicker, more efficient, and not influenced by hematocrit levels or medication. In this cohort, a PV value ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. would be an adequate cutoff to diagnose PJI in combination with CRP ≥ 13.5 mg/L.     

Exciting Performance of Plasma Fibrinogen in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis

ObjectiveTo test the significance of serum C‐reactive protein (CRP), the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), the platelet count/mean platelet volume ratio (PC/MPV), plasma fibrinogen, and D‐Dimer in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 149 patients diagnosed from July 2016 to December 2019 with primary osteoarthritis (OA group, average age 63.18 years [range, 53–82 years] 18 males, 46 females), PJI (PJI group, average age 63.74 years [range, 52–81 years], 16 males, 31 females), and aseptic loosening (aseptic group, average age 63.18 years [range, 53–80 years], 12 male, 26 female) in our department. Demographic data and the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative CRP, ESR, PC/MPV, fibrinogen, and D‐Dimer in PJI diagnosis were compared.ResultsThere were no significant differences when the demographic data of the three groups were compared. The expression level of CRP (50.67 ± 58.98 mg/L), ESR (50.55 ± 25.81 mm/h), PC/MPV (35.79 ± 18.00), and fibrinogen (4.85 ± 1.33 μg/mL) in the PJI group were higher than in the OA group (CRP: 4.09 ± 9.68 mg/L; ESR:13.44 ± 9.32 mm/1 h; PC/MPV: 24.97 ± 7.58; fibrinogen: 3.09 ± 0.55 μg/mL) and the aseptic group (CRP: 7.01 ± 11.83 mg/L; ESR: 22.47 ± 17.53 mm/1 h; PC/MPV: 25.18 ± 11.48; fibrinogen: 3.39 ± 0.80 μg/mL), respectively. The expression level of plasma D‐dimer (1.60 ± 1.29 mg/L) in the PJI group was higher than in the OA group (0.49 ± 0.42 mg/L) but similar to that in the aseptic group (1.21 ± 1.35 mg/L). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for CRP, ESR, PC/MPV, fibrinogen, and D‐dimer were 0.892 (95% confidence interval, 0.829–0.954), 0.888 (0.829–0.947), 0.686 (0.589–0.784), 0.873 (0.803–0.943), and 0.835 (0.772–0.899), respectively. When PC/MPV > 31.70, fibrinogen >4.01 μg/mL, and D‐dimer >1.17 mg/L were set as the threshold values for the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity of PC/MPV in PJI diagnosis was lower than that of ESR and plasma fibrinogen. In contrast, there was no significant difference when comparing the specificity of CRP, ESR, PC/MPV, fibrinogen, and D‐dimer in PJI diagnosis.ConclusionPlasma fibrinogen is a good new auxiliary diagnostic marker for PJI.     

D-Dimer,Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate,and C-Reactive Protein Sensitivities for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis

BackgroundThere is contradicting evidence on the diagnostic value of inflammatory biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to quantify the sensitivity of D-dimer for acute and chronic PJI diagnosis and evaluate D-dimer lab values in the 90-day postoperative window in a control cohort of primary joint arthroplasty patients for comparison.MethodsAn institutional database was queried for patients undergoing revision procedures for PJI after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2014 to present. CRP, ESR, and D-dimer were collected within 90 days pre and postoperatively and sensitivities for the diagnosis of PJI were calculated. The control group included patients who underwent a negative diagnostic workup for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE) and had a D-dimer lab collected within 90 days postoperatively from primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA).ResultsA total of 604 PJI patients were identified, and 81 patients had D-dimer, ESR, and CRP collected. There were 50/81 acute PJI patients and 31/81 chronic PJI patients who had median D-dimer values of 2,136.5 ng/mL [interquartile range (IQR): 1,642-3,966.5] and 3,336 ng/mL [IQR: 1,976-5,594]. Only the chronic PJI group had significantly higher D-dimer values when compared to the control cohort (P = .009). The sensitivity of D-dimer was calculated to be 92% and 93.5% in the acute and chronic PJI groups, respectively.ConclusionSerum D-dimer may not have high diagnostic utility for acute PJI, especially in the setting of recent surgery; however, it still may be useful for patients who have chronic PJI.     

Plasma Fibrinogen and Platelet Count Are Referable Tools for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundAlthough the MusculoSkeletal Infection Society has suggested a series of markers to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), no single marker can accurately identify infection before revision hip or knee arthroplasty, and exploring promising markers to easily and reliably diagnose PJI is ongoing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma fibrinogen and platelet count for diagnosing PJI.MethodsWe retrospectively included 439 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty from January 2008 to December 2018; 79 patients with coagulation-related comorbidities were evaluated separately. The remaining 360 patients constituted 153 PJI and 207 non-PJI patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the maximum sensitivity and specificity of the tested markers.ResultsThe receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the areas under the curve for plasma fibrinogen, platelet count, and serum C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were 0.834, 0.746, 0.887, and 0.842, respectively. Based on Youden's index, the optimal predictive cutoffs for fibrinogen and platelet count were 3.57 g/L and 221 × 10⁹/L, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 68.6% and 86.0% (fibrinogen) and 57.5% and 83.1% (platelet count) for diagnosing PJI. The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 76.7% and 72.2% (fibrinogen) and 48.8% and 63.9% (platelet count) for diagnosing PJI in patients with coagulation-related comorbidities.ConclusionPlasma fibrinogen performed well for diagnosing PJI before revision arthroplasty, and its value neared that of traditional inflammatory markers. Although the diagnostic value of the platelet count was inferior to traditional markers, its diagnostic value was fair for diagnosing PJI. Fibrinogen also may be useful for diagnosing PJI in patients with coagulation-related comorbidities.     

Variation in Inflammatory Biomarkers Among Demographic Groups Significantly Affects Their Accuracy in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundDiagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a multistep process that involves performing various tests including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The latter two tests, despite being used at all times for PJI diagnosis, are known to be nonspecific and substantially affected by demographic characteristics, including age, gender, race, and body mass index. It is unknown how these variations affect the diagnostic utility of serological markers for PJI.MethodsInstitutional databases were queried to identify patients undergoing revision arthroplasty between 2010 and 2018, in whom preoperative serum ESR and CRP was performed. Patient demographics were collected, and patients were cross-referenced with an internal database to determine their infection status. Analyses were performed to determine how ESR and CRP varied with respect to demographic factors, including age, gender, race, and infection status. Given that patient infection status was known at the time of revision, conclusions were drawn about the effect of these variations in inflammatory markers on the diagnostic utility of ESR and CRP.ResultsThe value of ESR increased by age was higher in females and African American race. No significant differences were observed in the value of CRP among the demographic factors, although a slight positive trend was observed with respect to age. The variation in inflammatory markers significantly affected the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ESR and CRP for PJI diagnosis.ConclusionUnderstanding how the accuracy of diagnostic tests varies with respect to demographic factors can help physicians avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary additional testing and reach more accurate diagnoses of PJI.     

Utility of Diagnostic Markers in Late Periprosthetic Joint Infection Workup for Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Who Received Antibiotics 48 Hours Before Aspiration

BackgroundDiagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains challenging despite recent advancements in testing and evolving criteria over the last decade. Moreover, the effects of antibiotic use on diagnostic markers are not fully understood. Thus, this study sought to determine the influence of antibiotic use within 48 hours before knee aspiration on synovial and serum laboratory values for suspected late PJI.MethodsPatients who underwent a TKA and subsequent knee arthrocentesis for PJI workup at least 6 weeks after their index arthroplasty were reviewed across a single healthcare system from 2013 to 2020. Median synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum WBC count were compared between immediate antibiotic and nonantibiotic PJI groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden’s index were used to determine test performance and diagnostic cutoffs for the immediate antibiotics group.ResultsThe immediate antibiotics group had significantly more culture-negative PJIs than the no antibiotics group (38.1 versus 16.2%, P = .0124). Synovial WBC count demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability for late PJI in the immediate antibiotics group (area under curve, AUC = 0.97), followed by synovial PMN percentage (AUC = 0.88), serum CRP (AUC = 0.86), and serum ESR (AUC = 0.82).ConclusionAntibiotic use immediately preceding knee aspiration should not preclude the utility of synovial and serum lab values for the diagnosis of late PJI. Instead, these markers should be considered thoroughly during infection workup considering the high rate of culture-negative PJI in these patients.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.     

Can the Leukocyte Esterase Strip Test Predict Persistence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection at Second-Stage Reimplantation?

BackgroundWe evaluated the reliability of intraoperative assessment of leukocyte esterase (LE) in synovial fluid samples from patients undergoing reimplantation following implant removal and spacer insertion for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our hypothesis was that a positive intraoperative LE test would be a better predictor of persistent infection than either serum C-reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or the combination of serum CRP and ESR.MethodsThe records of 76 patients who received a 2-stage exchange for PJI were retrospectively reviewed. Synovial fluid was collected for LE measurement during surgery before arthrotomy in 79 procedures. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) of LE, CRP, ESR, and CRP + ESR were calculated.ResultsSensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the LE assay were 82%, 99%, 90%, and 97%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an LE threshold of 1.5 between the first (negative) and the second (positive) level of the ordinal variable, so that a grade starting from 1+ was accurate for a diagnosis of persistent infection (AUC 0.9044). The best thresholds for the CRP and the ESR assay were 8.25 mg/L (82% sensitivity, 84% specificity, AUC 0.8416) and 45 mm/h (55% sensitivity, 87% specificity, AUC 0.7493), respectively.ConclusionThe LE strip test proved a reliable tool to diagnose persistence of infection and outperformed the serum CRP and ESR assays. The strip test provides a valuable intraoperative diagnostic during second-stage revision for PJI.     

Sensitivity and Specificity of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers in Diagnosis of Infection in Head-Neck Taper Corrosion of Metal-On-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the setting of adverse local tissue reactions in patients with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA) secondary to head-neck taper junction corrosion is challenging as it frequently has the appearance of purulence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and synovial fluid markers in diagnosing PJI in failed MoP THA due to head-neck taper corrosion.MethodsA total of 89 consecutive patients with MoP THA with head-neck taper corrosion in 2 groups was evaluated: (1) infection group (n = 11) and (2) noninfection group (n = 78). All patients had highly crossed polyethylene with cobalt chromium femoral heads and had preoperative synovial fluid aspiration. In addition, serum cobalt and chromium levels were analyzed.ResultsThe optimal cutoff value for synovial white blood cell was 2144 with 93% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Neutrophil count optimal cutoff value was 82% with 93% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of ESR and CRP determined optimal cutoff at 57 mm/h and 35 mg/L with 57% sensitivity and 94% specificity and 93% sensitivity and 76% specificity, respectively. There were no significant differences in metal ion levels between the infected and noninfected groups.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that ESR and CRP are useful in excluding PJI, whereas both synovial white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage in hip aspirate are useful markers for diagnosing infection in MoP THA patients with head-neck taper corrosion associated adverse local tissue reaction.     

The Potential Value of Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio,Platelet to Mean Platelet Volume Ratio in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

ObjectiveTo explore the possibility of obtaining more accurate information from routine blood tests for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).MethodsThis is a retrospective study. Between 2017 and 2018, a total of 246 patients who underwent total hip or knee revision surgery were included in this study. There were 146 females and 100 males, and the mean age of the patients was 62.1 ± 12.75 years. Laboratory parameters erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), D‐dimer, plasma fibrinogen, serum white blood cell (WBC), and calculable ratio markers were collected. Based on leukocytes (monocyte count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count), platelet count, and mean platelet volume Inflammation‐related ratio markers were calculated, which including monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and platelet to mean platelet volume ratio (PMR). Follow‐up of all studied cases for at least 1 year. The diagnostic value of the markers based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The most optimal combinations of blood markers were selected by the prediction models. Statistical analyses and prediction models were performed using R software.ResultsOf the 246 patients, 125 were diagnosed with PJI and 121 with aseptic loosening. A higher rate of patients underwent revision surgery due to hip prosthesis loosening in the aseptic loosening group (74.4%) compared to the PJI group (45.6%, P < 0.001). ROC curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for classical markers, fibrinogen was 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.805–0.901), ESR was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.785–0.887) and CRP was 0.825 (95% CI, 0.773–0.878). Followed by the PMR, PLR, NLR and MLR, which showed promising diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.791, 0.785, 0.736, and 0.733. The AUCs of the ratio markers were higher than those of D‐dimer (0.691;95% CI, 0.6243–0.7584) and serum WBC (0.622; 95% CI, 0.552–0.691). After the predictive model calculation, AUC was up to 0.923 (95% CI, 0.891–0.951) when plasma fibrinogen combined with MLR and PMR and interpreted excellent discriminatory capacity with a sensitivity of 86.40% and a specificity of 84.17%. The new combination significantly increases the accuracy and reliability of the diagnosis of PJI (P < 0.001). The AUC increased to 0.899 (95% CI, 0.861–0.931; P = 0.007) and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.880–0.946; P < 0.001), followed by CRP and ESR, respectively. All plasma fibrinogen, ESR, and CRP combined with both PMR and MLR achieved the highest specificity (89.17%) and PPV (85.34%).ConclusionThe diagnostic performance greatly improved when plasma fibrinogen, ESR, and CRP combined with ratio markers.     

Elevated ESR/CRP Ratio Is Associated With Reinfection After Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections

BackgroundRatios of established inflammatory markers, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), have been used for diagnostic purposes in the surgical field; however, the ESR:CRP ratio (ECR) has not been evaluated as a marker for predicting infection resolution in patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ECR in predicting postoperative reinfection in patients who underwent debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR).MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 179 consecutive patients who underwent DAIR revision total joint arthroplasty for PJI. Patients were stratified by acuity of their infection: acute PJI, acute hematogenous PJI, and chronic PJI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to evaluate ECR as diagnostic marker for predicting postoperative reinfection in patients who underwent DAIR.ResultsStatistically significant differences in ECR were found in patients who underwent DAIR revision total joint arthroplasty for chronic infection (1.23 vs 2.33; P = .04). There was no significant difference in ECR in patients who underwent DAIR for acute infection (P = .70) and acute hematogenous infection (P = .56). In patients who underwent DAIR for chronic PJI, ECR demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 84%, respectively, for the prediction of postoperative reinfection, which was significantly higher than that of ESR (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 47%; P < .001) and CRP (sensitivity, 50%; specificity, 26%; P < .001).ConclusionElevated ECR was associated with an increased reinfection risk in patients who underwent DAIR for chronic PJI, suggesting that preoperative ECR may be a useful predictor to identify patients at increased risk of reinfection after DAIR for chronic PJIs.     

Utility of Synovial White Blood Cell Count and Differential Before Reimplantation Surgery

BackgroundDetermining optimal timing of reimplantation during 2-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains elusive. Joint aspiration for synovial white blood cell (WBC) count and neutrophil percentage (PMN%) before reimplantation is widely performed; yet, the implications are rarely understood. Therefore, this study investigates (1) the diagnostic yield of synovial WBC count and differential analysis and (2) the calculated thresholds for persistent infection.MethodsInstitutional PJI databases identified 129 patients undergoing 2-stage exchange arthroplasty who had joint aspiration before reimplantation between February 2005 and May 2014. Persistent infection was defined as a positive aspirate culture, positive intraoperative cultures, or persistent symptoms of PJI—including subsequent PJI-related surgery. Receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to calculate thresholds maximizing sensitivity and specificity.ResultsThirty-three cases (33 of 129; 25.6%) were classified with persistent PJI. Compared with infection-free patients, these patients had significantly elevated PMN% (62.2% vs 48.9%; P = .03) and WBC count (1804 vs 954 cells/μL; P = .04). The receiver-operating characteristic curve provided thresholds of 62% and 640 cells/μL for synovial PMN% and WBC count, respectively. These thresholds provided sensitivity of 63% and 54.5% and specificity of 62% and 60.0%, respectively. The risk of persistent PJI for patients with PMN% >90% was 46.7% (7 of 15).ConclusionSynovial fluid analysis before reimplantation has unclear utility. Although statistically significant elevations in synovial WBC count and PMN% are observed for patients with persistent PJI, this did not translate into useful thresholds with clinical importance. However, with little other guidance regarding the timing of reimplantation, severely elevated WBC count and differential analysis may be of use.     

Serum and Synovial Biomarkers for Distinguishing Between Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study

BackgroundInflammatory responses in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may lead to the current serum and synovial fluid biomarkers that misidentify chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to investigate the expression of serum and synovial biomarkers in patients with active RA and to calculate thresholds for valuable biomarkers that distinguish between chronic PJI and active RA.MethodsThis prospective study was initiated to enroll 70 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty from January 2019 to January 2021, and 30 patients with active RA cumulative knee from August 2020 to March 2021. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society definition of PJI was utilized for the classification of cases as aseptic or infected. Serum d-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as synovial IL-6, percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils, and CD64 index level were measured preoperatively.ResultsAn increase in biomarker concentrations were observed in group C (active RA). Synovial fluid CD64 index exhibited good discriminatory power between group B (chronic PJI) and group C with an area under curve of 0.930. For the diagnosis of chronic PJI in the presence of active RA, the optimal threshold value of synovial CD64 index was 0.87, with a sensitivity of 82.86% and a specificity of 93.33%.ConclusionCurrent serum biomarkers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, IL-6, and d-dimer) did not apply to the diagnosis of suspected PJI with active RA. Fortunately, satisfactory results can be achieved by adjusting the threshold of synovial fluid biomarkers.