STARR手术治疗排便障碍综合征的临床研究

目的探讨STARR手术治疗排便障碍综合征（ODS）的临床疗效及并发症。方法将60例ODS患者随机分为治疗组、对照1组和对照2组,每组20名患者。治疗组采用STARR手术,对照1组采用PPH术,对照2组采用经阴道直肠前突修补术（荷包法）。观察、比较3组患者手术时间、出血量、住院时间、并发症、治疗效果等指标。结果治疗组与对照1组术后ODS评分、有效率、手术时间差异有统计学意义;治疗组手术时间、出血量少于对照2组的相关指标,差异有统计学意义。结论STARR手术治疗排便障碍综合征疗效肯定。     

STARR手术治疗排便障碍综合征的临床疗效观察

目的探讨STARR手术治疗排便障碍综合征的临床效果和安全性。方法对23例排便障碍综合征患者采取STARR手术治疗的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果术后20例患者临床症状缓解,其中19例患者直肠前突及直肠内脱垂得到改善,有效率87%。结论 STARR是一种安全有效的治疗排便障碍综合征的手术方法,术后并发症较少。     

TST STARR+：治疗出口梗阻型便秘的一项新术式

直肠前突和直肠内脱垂是引起出口梗阻型便秘（obstructed defecation syndrome,ODS）常见病因。经肛门吻合器直肠部分切除术（stapled transanal rectal resection,STARR）是近年来国际上治疗ODS的最常用术式。常规STARR需要使用两把PPH吻合器,且操作较复杂、学习曲线较长、切除组织容积有限。 Naldini等［1］报道了一种外径为36 mm、吻合腔容积大于35 cm3、钉高4．2 mm且具备4个可视开窗的圆形吻合器,将其应用于ODS和脱垂痔的治疗,疗效显著,并将该技术命名为TST STARR＋。2013年4月至2014年5月,武汉大学中南医院结直肠肛门外科运用该技术治疗ODS患者100例,疗效满意,现报道如下。     

经肛吻合器直肠切除术治疗出口梗阻型便秘的并发症分析

目的评价经肛吻合器直肠切除术（STARR）治疗出口梗阻型便秘（ODS）的安全性。方法回顾性分析2007年1月至2008年10月间第二炮兵总医院采用STARR治疗112例直肠前突和（或）直肠内套叠相关性ODS女性病例的临床资料．统计围手术期及术后远期并发症发生情况。结果术后早期发生并发症18例（16．1％）,包括肛门失禁（4．5％）、吻合口出血（2．7％）、吻合口部分裂开（0．9％）、肛裂（2．7％）、急性尿潴留（1．8％）、血栓性外痔（1．8％）、直肠阴道隔血肿（0．9％）、粪便嵌塞（0．9％）,其中2例患者（1．8％）因并发症需再次手术干预。术后中位随访24个月,远期发生并发症6例（5．4％）,包括：肛门失禁（1．8％）、排粪急迫感（0．9％）、吻合口周围炎致慢性疼痛（1．8％）、直肠憩室致慢性疼痛（0．9％）,其中3例患者（2．7％）需手术治疗。结论STARR是治疗出口梗阻型便秘相对安全的术式。     

排便梗阻综合征的诊断和治疗选择

慢性便秘是临床常见症状，西方国家人群的发病率占2％～30％，而中国人群的发病率尚不清楚，便秘对生活质量的影响是显而易见的，其中约30％～50％的便秘患者为排便梗阻^[1、2]。     

经肛吻合器直肠切除术在出口梗阻型便秘治疗中的应用

目的 评估经肛吻合器直肠切除术治疗出口梗阻型便秘的疗效及安全性.方法 2007年1月至2008年8月对56例经排粪造影证实存在直肠前突和(或)直肠套叠脱乖的出口梗阻型便秘患者,行吻合器经肛直肠切除手术,比较术前和术后临床症状缓解情况,并量化评分比较.结果 手术时间平均28 min,术后3 d内VAS疼痛评分平均3.2分.2例患者术后随访6个月,有轻度肛门失禁;2例患者分别随访2、4个月,吻合口有轻度炎症,致排便时肛门部轻度疼痛.无其他并发症发生.术后平均随访8个月,各项出几梗阻症状发牛率较术前均显著下降,尤其是排便困难及排便梗阻感的发生率均下降50%以上,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).量化评分后比较,术后便不尽感积分较术前下降65%,其余症状积分下降幅度均达72%以上,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 经肛吻合器直肠切除术治疗出口梗阻型便秘操作简单、创伤小、痛苦少、并发症少,近期疗效较满意.     

经肛吻合器直肠切除术治疗排便障碍

通过各种临床和实验研究,Longo推出了一种新的技术:经肛吻合器直肠切除术(stapled transanal rectal resection,STARR),即运用环行吻合器治疗导致排便障碍的一些疾病,包括直肠内脱垂和直肠前突引起的排便梗阻综合征。一、施行STARR手术的指征     

经肛吻合器直肠切除术后盆底生物反馈康复训练疗效观察

目的：探讨经肛吻合器直肠切除术（STARR术）术后盆底生物反馈训练的疗效。方法：将96例STARR术后患者随机分为两组,对照组无术后康复训练,观察组采用盆底生物反馈康复训练2个疗程,观察两组治疗效果。结果：手术后平均随访6个月,观察组有效率87.5%,对照组有效率68.7%（P＜0.05）。结论：STARR术后应用盆底生物反馈康复训练有助于缓解排便障碍。     

经肛吻合器直肠切除术治疗直肠前突疗效观察

目的观察经肛吻合器直肠切除术治疗直肠前突的临床疗效。方法随机将需手术治疗的56例直肠前突患者分为对照组26例和观察组30例。对照组给予经肛门直肠修补术,观察组采用经肛吻合器直肠切除术,观察两组疗效。结果观察组疗效优于对照组(P0.05)。观察组在手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间方面均显著优于对照组(P0.05)。对照组并发症的发生率显著高于观察组(P0.05)。两组比较,差异有统计学意义。结论经肛吻合器直肠切除术具有手术时间短,术中出血量少及恢复快等优势,值得临床推广应用。     

直肠前突治疗的新选择—STARR

经肛门吻合器直肠部分切除术(stapled transanal rectal resection,STARR)是意大利学者Longo[1]于2003年提出的用于治疗排便障碍综合征(obstructed defecation syndrome,ODS)的新术式.该术式采用2把痔上黏膜环切吻合器分别切除直肠中下段前壁及后壁冗长、脱垂的黏膜及黏膜下层肠壁组织并钉合.此术式可缩小直肠前突的宽度与深度,吻合口通过使黏膜下层与肌层瘢痕粘连,加强了直肠前壁的力量,减轻了直肠前突的程度,从而消除了直肠下端因排便形成的囊袋状结构,达到恢复正常解剖结构动态功能的作用,使直肠的顺应性降低,从而改善各种症状.     

Medium‐term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation and symptomatic rectal‐anal intussusception

Aim Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) is an increasingly accepted treatment for obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) associated with internal rectal prolapse (IRP) and rectocoele. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medium to long‐term outcomes of STARR for ODS. Method The intermediate‐term results of STARR used over a 9 ‐year period were reviewed from the analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Patients were followed for a median period of 98 (95% CI 85–112, range 5–386) weeks. Results Three hundred and forty‐four (234 woman) patients of median age 54 (19–90) years underwent STARR over a 9‐ year period. Preoperative symptoms included pelvic pain (93%), incomplete evacuation (90%), urgency (74%), a sensation of obstruction (65%) and rectal digitation (27%). Thirteen had the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Of 326 patients with follow‐up data, 249 (76%) were followed beyond 1 year and 149 (43%) beyond 2 years. The ODS score improved [14.6 ± 5.4 pre vs 1.6 ± 3.1 post (P < 0.0001)] as did the faecal incontinence (FI) score [3.5 ± 3.3 pre vs 0.4 ± 1.3 post (P < 0.0001)]. Fifteen (4.3%) patients reported deterioration in FI, and 11 (3.2%) experienced new onset minor incontinence. Urgency was 72% at 8 weeks, 20% at 16 weeks, 11.5% at 52 weeks and 5% at 1.5 years. None of the 29 patients followed beyond 4 years reported urgency. Urgency was unrelated to sex, age or preoperative ODS symptoms (Mantel‐Cox log‐rank). Recurrent symptoms of ODS occurred in 4.9%. Eighty‐one per cent of patients were highly satisfied with STARR and would recommend or have it again. Conclusion STARR was successful for the treatment of selected patients with ODS and IRP. Postoperative faecal urgency rapidly decreases with time. It is not possible to predict who will develop urgency.     

Consensus conference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for disordered defaecation

An international working party was convened in Rome, Italy on 16-17 June, 2005, with the purpose of developing a consensus on the application of the circular stapling instrument to the treatment of certain rectal conditions, the so-called Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR). Since the procedure has been submitted to only limited objective analysis it was felt prudent to hold a meeting of interested individuals for the purpose of evaluating the current status and to make conclusions and recommendations concerning the applicability of this new approach.     

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a new option in the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome

Background Rectocele and distal intussusception are organic causes of outlet obstruction. A new surgical option called the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) is described within a prospective study. Patients and methods Fourteen patients with symptomatic rectocele (four females), rectocele with coexistent intussusception (eight females), and intussusception (two males) underwent STARR procedure. The symptoms were measured by means of a defecation score (0–20 points). Results Complications included local bleeding postoperatively in two cases, and temporary ischuria in four cases. The subjective sense of pain was low; from day 1 postoperatively five patients did not need any analgetics. Only one female patient had prolonged pelvic pain, without any organic reason. All patients showed improvement in rectal evacuation. The mean score of defecation (0–20 points) decreased from 13±3 to 4±3 after 1 month (p<0.05) and remained low. The overall follow-up was 19±9 months. Only one male patient with intussusception had defecation disorder again 6 months after surgery. Three patients had temporary urge incontinence. Conclusion STARR is an effective therapy for obstructive defecation disorder due to a symptomatic rectocele and/or a distal intussusception.     

Anatomical and functional results after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defaecation syndrome

Aim The STARR procedure is a surgical option for the treatment of rectocoele associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of this technique in restoring anatomy and the long‐term sustainability of symptom control and quality of life. Methods Of 48 patients operated on from 2003 to 2007, 30 were enrolled for this prospective assessment of anatomical correction and functional improvement of ODS. Results from a standardized questionnaire concerning functional results (ODS score), faecal incontinence (Cleveland Clinic score) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC‐QoL) were prospectively collected. Systematic dynamic defaecography, together with anorectal physiology testing, were performed before surgery and 6 months after. Twenty‐five patients were available for long‐term assessment of functional outcome (more than 4 years). Results The mean age of the population was 57 ± 7 years. STARR produced significant improvements in the PAC QoL (P < 0.05) and ODS score (P < 0.0001), but not in the incontinence score. At defaecography, correction was significant with respect to the depth (P = 0.007), perimeter (P < 0.0001) and neck (P = 0.001) of rectocoele. Anorectal physiology revealed a lower maximal tolerated rectal volume (P < 0.0001). After 58 months, the 25 patients showed sustained functional results and QoL. Four patients (16%) underwent further surgical procedure for pelvic floor disorders and eight patients (32%) still required laxatives. Conclusion Our study confirms the efficacy of the STARR procedure, with sustained improvement in function and QoL. However, a substantial number of patients remain symptomatic.