An analysis of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter‐1, ribonucleoside reductase subunit M1, ribonucleoside reductase subunit M2, and excision repair cross‐complementing gene‐1 expression in patients with resected pancreas adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Tumor overexpression of excision repair cross‐complementing gene‐1 (ERCC1) may be associated with decreased survival in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma (PAC). Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter‐1 (hENT1) and ribonucleoside reductase subunits M1 and M2 (RRM1 and RRM2) are integral to cellular transport and DNA synthesis and are implicated as poor prognostic factors in other malignancies. To the authors's knowledge, their role in PAC is not defined.

METHODS:

A prospective database was used to randomly select 95 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PAC between January 2000 and October 2008. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on tumor samples for hENT1, RRM1 and RRM2, and ERCC1. Main outcomes were recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

The median follow‐up, RFS, and OS were 49 months, 10.6 months, and 15.5 months, respectively. The median tumor size was 3 cm. Approximately 26% of patients had positive microscopic margins, 61% had lymph node involvement, and 88% and 45% had perineural and lymphovascular invasion, respectively. High tumor expression of hENT1, RRM1, RRM2, and ERCC1 was present in 85%, 40%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, of patients. High hENT1 expression was associated with reduced RFS (9.5 months vs 44.5 months; P = .029), but not with OS. RRM1 expression was not associated with survival. High RRM2 expression was associated with reduced RFS (6.9 months vs 16.0 months; P < .0001) and decreased OS (9.1 months vs 18.4 months; P < .0001). High ERCC1 expression was associated with reduced RFS (6.1 months vs 15 months; P = .04) and decreased OS (8.9 months vs 18.1 months; P = .03). After accounting for known adverse tumor factors, high expression of RRM2 and ERCC1 persisted as negative prognostic factors for RFS and OS. A subset analysis of patients who received adjuvant therapy (n = 74) revealed the same negative effect of high RRM2 and ERCC1 expression on RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

High tumor expression of RRM2 and ERCC1 are associated with reduced RFS and OS after resection of pancreas cancer. These biomarkers may help to personalize adjuvant therapy. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Clinical role of multidrug resistance protein 1 expression in chemotherapy resistance in early-stage breast cancer: the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: The multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) is expressed in human breast cancer cells and may contribute to the clinical drug resistance of breast cancer patients. Therefore, we determined the impact of MRP1 expression on the clinical outcome of adjuvant therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunostaining for MRP1 was performed on tissue sections from 516 premenopausal, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with stage I and II disease. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the effect of MRP1 expression on survival and to test for interaction between MRP1 expression and treatment. RESULTS: MRP1 expression independently predicted shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF; RFS: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.88; P = .002; OS: HR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.01; P = .02), but it did not predict shorter RFS and OS in patients who received tamoxifen plus goserelin (RFS: HR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.31; P = .9; OS: HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.15; P = .1). Tests for interaction between MRP1 expression and treatment were statistically significant for both RFS (P = .04) and OS (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that MRP1 expression plays an important role in the clinical resistance to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy but does not seem to affect response to adjuvant endocrine treatment with tamoxifen plus goserelin. Thus, MRP1 may be a useful marker for the selection of patients with early-stage breast cancer for the appropriate adjuvant therapy after prospective confirmatory evaluation.     

Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: pooled analysis of two STBSG-EORTC phase III clinical trials

BackgroundThe EORTC-STBSG coordinated two large trials of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Both studies failed to demonstrate any benefit on overall survival (OS). The aim of the analysis of these two trials was to identify subgroups of patients who may benefit from adjuvant CT.Patients and methodsIndividual patient data from two EORTC trials comparing doxorubicin-based CT to observation only in completely resected STS (large resection, R0/marginal resection, R1) were pooled. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patient outcomes were subsequently compared between the two groups of patients according to each analyzed factor.ResultsA total of 819 patients had been enrolled with a median follow-up of 8.2 years. Tumor size, high histological grade and R1 resection emerged as independent adverse prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS. Adjuvant CT is an independent favorable prognostic factor for RFS but not for OS. A significant interaction between benefit of adjuvant CT and age, gender and R1 resection was observed for RFS and OS. Males and patients >40 years had a significantly better RFS in the treatment arms, while adjuvant CT was associated with a marginally worse OS in females and patients <40years. Patients with R1 resection had a significantly better RFS and OS favoring adjuvant CT arms.ConclusionAdjuvant CT is not associated with a better OS in young patients or in any pathology subgroup. Poor quality of initial surgery is the most important prognostic and predictive factor for utility of adjuvant CT in STS. Based on these data, we conclude that adjuvant CT for STS remains an investigational procedure and is not a routine standard of care.     

The prognostic significance of expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) in primary breast cancer.

In the present study, we determined the frequency and intensity of MRP protein expression by monoclonal antibody immunohistochemistry in a series of 259 resected invasive primary breast carcinomas, and we evaluated MRP immunoreactivity in relation to patient and tumour characteristics, relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The immunostaining was graded on a semiquantitative scale that ranged from (-) to ( ). Overall, 34% of the tumours were positive for anti-MRP antibody: 19% showed weak cytoplasmic staining (+), 14% had clear cytoplasmic staining (++) and only 1% of the tumours had a strong cytoplasmic as well as membranous staining ( ). MRP expression was not related to patient''s age, menopausal status, tumour size, differentiation grade, oestrogen and progesterone receptor level or lymph node involvement. In an exploratory univariate analysis of all patients, only primary tumour size and number of lymph nodes involved were significantly associated with shortened RFS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 respectively) and OS (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001 respectively). In Cox univariate analysis for RFS in subgroups of patients stratified by menopausal status, tumour size, nodal status, adjuvant systemic therapy and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status, MRP expression was associated with increased risk for failure in patients with small tumours (T1), in node-negative patients and in node-positive patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF); the relative hazard rate (RHR) for relapse was increased in the presence of MRP, with RHR values with 95% confidence limits (CL) of 2.8 (1.2-6.9), 2.1 (1.0-4.2) and 2.8 (0.8-9.9) respectively. In analysis for OS, expression of MRP was also associated with increased risk for failure in patients with small tumours (T1) [RHR (95% CL) 2.3 (0.9-6.0)] and in node-positive patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with CMF [RHR (95% CL) 3.7 (0.8-17.1)] but not in node-negative patients [RHR (95% CL) 1.1 (0.4-2.6)]. In conclusion, our results show that MRP is frequently overexpressed in primary breast cancer and suggest that MRP expression might be of prognostic significance in the subgroups of patients with the more favourable prognosis, i.e. patients with small tumours and node-negative patients, as well as in the setting of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. In primary breast cancer, MRP might be related to altered cell biological behaviour, including a more aggressive phenotype, and resistance to adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.     

Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer

BackgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding systemic treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC). Clinical trials are challenging because of the relatively low incidence and good prognosis. Initial results of the International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON)1 trial demonstrated benefit in both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with adjuvant chemotherapy. We report results of 10-year follow-up to establish whether benefits are maintained longer term and discuss how this and other available evidence from randomised trials can be used to guide treatment options regarding the need for, and choice of, adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.Patients and methodsICON1 recruited women with OC following primary surgery in whom there was uncertainty as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant or no adjuvant chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy was recommended and 87% received single-agent carboplatin. Analyses of long-term treatment benefits and interaction with risk groups were carried out. A high-risk group of women was defined with stage 1B/1C grade 2/3, any stage 1 grade 3 or clear-cell histology.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 10 years, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for RFS was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.94, P = 0.02] and OS 0.71 (95% CI 0.52–0.98, P = 0.04) in favour of chemotherapy. In absolute terms, there was a 10% (60%–70%) improvement in RFS and a 9% (64%–73%) improvement in OS; the benefit of chemotherapy might be greater in high-risk disease (18% improvement in OS). Uncertainty remains about the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The only randomised trial data available are from a subset of 120 stage 1 patients in ICON3 where the treatment difference, comparing carboplatin with carboplatin/paclitaxel was estimated with relatively wide CIs [progression-free survival HR = 0.71 (95% CI 0.39–1.32) and OS HR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.49–1.93)].ConclusionsExtended follow-up from ICON1 confirms that adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to women with early-stage OC, particularly those with high-risk disease.Clinical trial numbersISRCTN11916376 for ICON1 and ISRCTN57157825 for ICON3.     

Role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with resected gallbladder carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis (KROG 19-04)

Objective:The effectiveness of adjuvant treatments for resected gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has remained unclear due to lack of randomized controlled trials; thus, the aim of present study was to evaluate the role of adjuvant treatments, including chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and/or chemotherapy (CTx), in patients with resected GBC.Methods:A total of 733 GBC patients who received curative-intent surgical resection were identified in a multi-institutional database. Of 733 patients, 372 (50.8%) did not receive adjuvant treatment, whereas 215 (29.3%) and 146 (19.9%) received adjuvant CTx and CRT, respectively. The locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) of the adjuvant treatment groups were compared according to tumor stage (stage II vs. stage III–IV).Results:In stage II disease (n = 381), the 5-year LRFS, RFS, and OS were not significantly different among the no-adjuvant therapy, CTx, and CRT groups, and positive resection margin, presence of perineural invasion, and Nx classification were consistently associated with worse LRFS, RFS, and OS in the multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). For stage III–IV (n = 352), the CRT group had significantly higher 5-year LRFS, RFS, and OS than the no-adjuvant therapy and CTx groups (67.8%, 45.2%, and 56.9%; 37.9%, 28.8%, and 35.4%; and 45.0%, 30.0%, and 45.7%, respectively) (P < 0.05).Conclusions:CRT has value as adjuvant treatment for resected GBC with stage III–IV disease. Further study is needed for stage II disease with high-risk features.     

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in surgically resected stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma and its correlation with driver mutations and clinical outcomes

BackgroundProgrammed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed in a group of cancers that may be suitable targets for specific immunotherapy. This study investigated the expression of PD-L1 in surgically resected stage I adenocarcinomas and correlated this with known major driver mutations and clinical outcomes.Materials and methodsOne hundred and sixty-three patients with surgically resected stage I adenocarcinomas were explored. Paraffin-embedded tumour sections were stained with PD-L1 antibody. Tumours with moderate-to-strong membrane staining in ⩾5% of tumour cells were scored as positive for PD-L1 overexpression. The driver mutation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) were examined by direct sequencing and anaplastic lymphoma kinsase (ALK) by immunohistochemistry. The correlations of PD-L1 expression with major driver mutations and clinicopathologic parameters were analysed.ResultsThe overall frequency of PD-L1 overexpression was 39.9% (65/163). PD-L1 had higher positive results in tumours with higher grade differentiation and vascular invasion and PD-L1 expression was not associated with the expressions of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ALK. Multivariate analysis revealed that abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and higher grade of differentiation were risk factors for poor relapse-free survival (RFS) and PD-L1 expression correlated with better RFS. Advanced pathologic stage was the independent risk for poor overall survival (OS).ConclusionsThe PD-L1 expression can be used as a prognostic indicator predictive of RFS in patients with surgically resected stage I lung adenocarcinomas. There may be a possibility for immunotherapy targeting the PD-L1 pathway in patients with lung adenocarcinoma in the future.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin-C (FAM) for 6 months after curative resection of gastric carcinoma.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and mitomycin-C (FAM) adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who had undergone curative resection of gastric carcinoma. METHODS: From Nov 1999 to Jan 2002, 291 consecutive patients with stage IB-IIIB gastric adenocarcinoma were given FAM adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy comprised intravenous 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 29 and 36), doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 29) and mitomycin-C 10 mg/m(2) (day 1), every 8 weeks for 6 months. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 60.6 months, 92 patients died, and 93 patients had recurrent disease. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 85.9% for stage IB, 72.1% for stage II, 58.0% for stage IIIA, and 48.2% for stage IIIB (p=0.002). The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 85.2% for stage IB, 71.2% for stage II, 53.3% for stage IIIA, and 39.2% for stage IIIB (p<0.001). A total of 769 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered, and 15 patients experienced grade 3 or higher leukopenia. The most common grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity was nausea/vomiting (11 patients), followed by stomatitis (3 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy with FAM for 6 months for gastric carcinoma indicated comparable RFS and OS with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

The role of Cathepsin S as a marker of prognosis and predictor of chemotherapy benefit in adjuvant CRC: a pilot study

Background:

The aim of this pilot retrospective study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of Cathepsin S (CatS) in three cohorts of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n=560).

Methods:

Prevalence and association with histopathological variables were assessed across all cohorts. Association with clinical outcomes was investigated in the Northern Ireland Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial cohort (n=211), where stage II/III CRC patients were randomised between surgery-alone or surgery with adjuvant fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) treatment.

Results:

Greater than 95% of tumours had detectable CatS expression with significantly increased staining in tumours compared with matched normal colon (P>0.001). Increasing CatS was associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS; P=0.03) among patients treated with surgery alone. Adjuvant FU/FA significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12–0.89) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.81) among 36 patients with high CatS. Treatment did not benefit the 66 patients with low CatS, with a RFS HR of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.60–3.19) and OS HR of 1.33 (95% CI, 0.56–3.15). Interaction between CatS and treatment status was significant for RFS (P=0.02) and OS (P=0.04) in a multivariate model adjusted for known prognostic markers.

Conclusion:

These results signify that CatS may be an important prognostic biomarker and predictive of response to adjuvant FU/FA in CRC.     

Five-year oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors for locally advanced low rectal cancer after low anterior resection

Objective： The aim of the study is to investigate the longterm oncologic outcomes including local recurrence, distant metastases and overall survival （OS） for patients with low rectal cancer underwent low anterior resection （LAR） with total mesorectal excision （TME）, and to analyze the prognostic factors for them. Methods： Between January 2001 and December 2009, 147 patients with clinical stage II and III rectal cancers located 3-6 cm from the anal verge underwent LAR with TME without temporary diverting stoma. The median distal resection margin （DRM） was 1.0 （range, 0.3-5） cm. Anastomostic leakage occurred in 29 （19.7%） patients. Thirty patients received surgery alone, 20 patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy （CRT）, 43 patients received postoperative CRT, and adjuvant chemotherapy was administered for 108 patients. The median cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy was 6 （range, 2-20） cycles. The median followup was 74.8 （range, 30.1-146.3） months. Results： In all patients, 5-year recurrence-free survival （RFS）, disease-free survival （DFS） and OS were 70.4%, 54.2% and 60.5%, respectively. Forty-three （29.3%） patients suffered local recurrence. Patients received preoperative CRT with a downstaging yp0/1 who had a better 5-year RFS, DFS and OS, which were 100%, 90.9%, and 90.9%, respectively. For patients with pathologic stage Ⅱ and stage Ⅲ, the 5-year RFS, DFS, and OS were 79.2% and 60.1%, 67.9% and 39.1%, 72.1% and 48.2%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, RFS was associated with anostomostic leakage, DFS was associated with anastomostic leakage and pathologic N stage, and OS was associated with anastomostic leakage, pathologic N and T stage. For patients with anastomostic leakage, the 5-year RFS, DFS, and OS were 51.7%, 32.4%, and 38.3%, respectively, which were worse than that for patients without anastomostic leakage, the latter were 75.2%, 59.7%, 65.7%, respectively （P 〈 0.05）. DRM and radiotherapy were associated with RFS on univariable     

Pathological complete response and survival according to the level of HER-2 amplification after trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Background:

We analysed whether the level of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) amplification significantly influenced either pathological complete response (pCR) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods:

In all, 99 patients with an HER-2-amplified breast tumour treated with trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy were included. Tumours were classified as low amplified (LA; 6–10 signals per nuclei) or highly amplified (HA; >10 signals). Pathological response was assessed according to Chevallier''s classification (pCR was defined as grade 1 or 2). Median follow-up lasted 46 months (6–83). Cox uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results:

In all, 33 tumour samples were LA and 66 were HA. The pCR in HA tumours was significantly higher than in LA tumours (55% vs 24%, P=0.005), whereas no association was found between the pCR rate and tumour stage, grade or hormone receptor status. In multivariate analysis, the pathological nodal status (P=0.005) and adjuvant trastuzumab (P=0.037) were independently associated with RFS, whereas the level of HER-2 amplification nearly reached statistical significance (P=0.057). There was no significant difference between LA and HA tumours for OS (P=0.22, log-rank).

Conclusion:

The level of HER-2 gene amplification significantly influenced pCR but not RFS or OS in non-metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy. However, RFS in patients with HA tumours tended to be shorter.     

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles on Prognosis of Resectable Stomach Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles on the prognosisof patients with post-operative stomach cancer through retrospective analysis. Methods: A total of 128 patientswith gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin,cisplatin or oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil, according to a defined schedule, were divided into threegroups according to the number of chemotherapy cycles: Group I (<6 cycles); Group II (6 cycles); and GroupIII (>6 cycles). Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 20.8% in Group I, 45.0% in Group II, and 42.9%in Group III, with a median follow-up of 43 months. The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 15.1% in GroupI, 40% in Group II, and 40% in Group III. The OS and RFS in Groups II and III were significantly betterthan in Group I (OS, p = 0.002 and p=0.003; RFS, P<0.001 and P=0.002). There was no difference in OS (p =0.970) or in RFS (p = 0.722) between Groups II and III. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis determined that thenumber of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles was an independent factor that influenced OS and RFS. Conclusion:Six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy gave encouraging outcomes in patients with resectable gastric cancer.Further prospective randomized controlled investigations are warranted in a multi-center setting.     

Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in 93 patients with uterine sarcoma from 4 centers in Turkey

Introduction: Uterine sarcomas are a group of heterogenous and rare malignancies of the female genitaltract and there is a lack of consensus on prognostic factors and optimal treatment. Objective and Methodology:To perform a retrospective evaluation of clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors and treatmentoutcomes of 93 patients with uterine sarcomas who were diagnosed and treated at 4 different centers fromNovember 2000 to October 2010. Results: Of the 93 patients, 58.0% had leiomyosarcomas, 26.9% malignantmixed Mullerian tumors, 9.7% endometrial stromal sarcomas, and 5.4% other histological types. Accordingto the last International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging, 43.0% were stage I, 20.4%were stage II, 22.6% were stage III and 14.0 % were stage IV. Median relapse free survival (RFS) was 20 months(95% confidence interval (CI), 12.4-27.6 months), RFS after 1, 2, 5 years were 66.6%, 44.1%, 16.5% respectively.Median overall survival (OS) was 56 months (95% CI, 22.5-89.5 months), and OS after 1, 2, 5 years was 84.7%,78%, 49.4% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥60 years and high grade tumor were significantlyassociated with poor OS and RFS; patients administered adjuvant treatment with sequential chemotherapyand radiotherapy had longer RFS time. Among patients with leiomyosarcoma, in addition to age and grade,adjuvant treatment with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy after surgery had significant effects on OS.Conclusion: Uterine sarcomas have poor progrosis even at early stages. Prognostic factors affecting OS werefound to be age and grade.     

Does delay of adjuvant chemotherapy impact survival in patients with resected stage II and III colon adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND:

It is unclear whether delays in commencing adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection of colon adenocarcinoma adversely impact survival.

METHODS:

Patients with stage II‐III colon adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant chemotherapy at 2 centers were identified through the institutional tumor registry. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival (OS), and relapse‐free survival (RFS) were calculated from the day of surgery. Patients were dichotomized into early (time to adjuvant chemotherapy ≤60 days) and late treatment (time to adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days) groups. OS and RFS were compared using log‐rank test and multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS:

Of 186 patients included in the study, 49 (26%) had received adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days after surgical resection. Thirty percent of the delays were system related (eg, late referrals, insurance authorizations). Time to adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days was associated with significantly worse OS in both univariate analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.08‐4.36). Although difference in RFS between the 2 groups favored time to adjuvant chemotherapy <60, this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS:

Adjuvant chemotherapy delay >60 days after surgical resection of colon cancer is associated with worse OS. Cancer 2011;. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Class III beta-tubulin expression and benefit from adjuvant cisplatin/vinorelbine chemotherapy in operable non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of NCIC JBR.10.

PURPOSE: High class III beta-tubulin (bTubIII) expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer is known to correlate with reduced response rates and inferior survival with anti-microtubule agents. JBR.10 showed a 12% and 15% improvement in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively, with the addition of cisplatin and vinorelbine following resection of stage IB-II non-small cell lung cancer. We sought to determine the effect of bTubIII on patient outcome and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the JBR.10 trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We did a semiquantitative immunohistochemical assay for bTubIII on primary tumor tissue available from 265 of the 482 patients in JBR.10. Tumors were classified as bTubIII "low" or "high" using a validated method. We examined the prognostic effect of bTubIII in patients treated with or without chemotherapy and the survival benefit from chemotherapy in low versus high bTubIII subgroups. RESULTS: High bTubIII expression was associated with poorer RFS and OS in patients treated with surgery alone but not in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The RFS and OS benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy were greater in high versus low tubulin expressors. However, with Cox regression, the interaction between bTubIII status and chemotherapy treatment in predicting RFS or OS did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy seemed to overcome the negative prognostic effect of high bTubIII expression. Greater benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was seen in patients with high bTubIII expression. This is contrary to what has been seen in the setting of advanced disease; possible reasons for this difference are being explored.     

Does vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) predict local relapse and survival in radiotherapy-treated node-negative breast cancer?

The aim of this study was to determine the association of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) content in 302 consecutive node-negative breast cancer (NNBC) patients treated with only locoregional radiotherapy to relapse free- (RFS) and overall survival (OS). VEGF content in tumour cytosols was measured by an enzymatic immunoassay for the major isoform VEGF165. The median age was 56 years, the median follow-up time 56 months. A wide range (0.01-144.79 pg microg(-1) DNA) of VEGF content was found (median 1.92). Significant associations were found between VEGF and oestrogen receptor (ER) content, progesterone receptor (PR) and tumour size (P = 0.005). Univariate analysis displayed significant reduced RFS and OS for patients with higher VEGF content (P = 0.0113 and P = 0.0075 respectively). A total of 43 recurrences have been found (ten local relapses within the breast, five in the axillary or supraclavicular lymph nodes and 28 distant metastasis). There was no significant correlation between the localization of the relapse and the VEGF content. Multivariate analysis suggested VEGF as the only predictor of OS (relative risk (RR) = 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97-13.37), and in patients with T1 tumours (n = 236) the multivariate analysis clearly displayed VEGF as the only independent predictor of both RFS and OS (RR = 5.1, CI = 1.07-24.59). In the subgroup with ER-positive tumours (n = 229), multivariate analysis showed VEGF as the only significant predictor of RFS and OS (RR = 10.44, CI = 1.26-86.38). The results suggest VEGF165 as a predictor of RFS and OS in NNBC patients treated with locoregional radiotherapy, comprising especially patients with favourable prognosis of T1 tumours, or ER-positive tumours. The high VEGF expression might define a radioresistant phenotype, or indicate an early distant spread which might require adjuvant systemic treatment.     

HER2 as a potential biomarker guiding adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer

BackgroundHER2 is a well-established therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancers, while the role of HER2 in colorectal cancer is unclear, and no studies have explored the impact of HER2 on the outcome of stage II colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracial based adjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsWe analyzed HER2 mRNA expression of 206 patients in GSE39582 dataset and explored the impact of HER2 expression on benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer patients. We further validated the finding by retrospectively analyzing HER2 detection of immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 282 patients in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC).ResultsIn GSE39582 dataset, chemo-treated HER2-high patients had a better overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) versus chemo-naïve HER2-high patients (5-year OS: 100% vs 69.5%, 5-year RFS: 100% and vs 64%, P = 0.027 and 0.025, respectively). On the contrary, chemo-treated HER2-low patients had a worse RFS compared with chemo-naïve HER2-low patients (5-year RFS: 65.6% vs 82.1%, P = 0.022). In FUSCC cohort, chemo-treated HER2-positive patients exhibited better OS vs chemo-naïve HER2-positive patients (5-year OS: 100% vs 73.8%, P < 0.001), and showed marginal evidence of a lower probability of recurrence (5-year RFS: 74.4% vs 58.7%, P = 0.072). After stratifying by mismatch repair (MMR) status, the results only kept consistency in patients with pMMR status.ConclusionsHER2-positve patients with stage II colorectal cancer can benefit from 5-fluorouracial based adjuvant chemotherapy, especially for patients with pMMR status.     

High p27Kip1 expression predicts superior relapse-free and overall survival for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen plus goserelin.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of p27Kip1 in premenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined tumor specimens from 512 patients with breast cancer who were enrolled onto Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 5. In this trial, premenopausal, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with stage I and II disease were randomly assigned to receive either 5 years of tamoxifen plus 3 years of goserelin or six cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. p27Kip1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and its association with clinical outcome was determined. Statistical analyses were performed to test for interaction between p27Kip1 status and treatment. RESULTS: High p27Kip1 expression (nuclear p27Kip1 staining in >/= 50% of tumor cells) independently predicted superior relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in both the total study population (RFS: relative risk [RR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.82; P =.004; OS: RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.58; P <.001) and patients treated with combination endocrine therapy (RFS: RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.63; P =.001; OS: RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.53; P =.003). The interaction between p27Kip1 expression and treatment was statistically significant for RFS (P =.04) but not for OS (P =.27). CONCLUSION: High p27Kip1 expression was an independent predictor of responsiveness to hormonal therapy and thus may be useful for the selection of premenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer for adjuvant combination endocrine therapy.