A postmarketing evaluation of the safety of Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine in children 5 through 17 years of age

Background

Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was licensed in 2003 in the United States for use in individuals aged 5–49 years.

Methods

A prospective observational postmarketing study was conducted to evaluate the safety of LAIV. Rates of medically attended events (MAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in eligible children aged 5–17 years receiving LAIV as part of routine care from October 2003 to March 2008 were compared with rates in nonrandomized self, matched unvaccinated, and matched trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV)-vaccinated controls. All MAEs and SAEs through 42 days postvaccination and all hospitalizations and deaths through 6 months postvaccination were analyzed. Statistical significance was assigned without multiplicity adjustment.

Results

43,702 LAIV recipients were matched with similar numbers of TIV-vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Of approximately 9500 MAE incidence rate comparisons, 204 were statistically significantly higher and 168 were statistically significantly lower in LAIV recipients versus controls. No pattern of MAE rate differences suggested a safety signal with LAIV. Asthma/wheezing MAEs were not statistically increased in LAIV recipients. No anaphylaxis events occurred within 3 days postvaccination. Rates of SAEs were similar between LAIV and control groups. Two SAEs were considered possibly related to LAIV: Bell's palsy and nonspecific paroxysmal spell.

Conclusions

Results of this postlicensure evaluation of LAIV safety in US children aged 5–17 years are consistent with preapproval clinical studies and Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System reports, both of which demonstrated no significant increase in asthma/wheezing events or other adverse outcomes among eligible children who received LAIV.     

Safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine in mild to moderately immunocompromised children with cancer

Background

The safety of intranasal live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in immunocompromised children with cancer is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe the safety and immunogenicity of LAIV in mild to moderately immunocompromised children with cancer.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of LAIV versus placebo in children aged 5-17 years with cancer. LAIV (frozen formulation) or allantoic fluid/buffer was administered intranasally. Reactogenicity, adverse events, blood for immune assays, and nasal swabs for viral shedding were obtained during 5 visits over the first 42 days postvaccination; information concerning serious adverse events (SAEs) was collected for 180 days.

Results

20 subjects were enrolled (LAIV, n = 10; placebo, n = 10) with a mean age of 12.2 years. Ten subjects had hematologic malignancy (LAIV, n = 4; placebo, n = 6); 10 subjects had solid tumors (LAIV, n = 6; placebo, n = 4). One subject was excluded from immunogenicity analysis for not receiving a full dose of LAIV. LAIV resulted in an increased incidence of runny nose/nasal congestion occurring in all LAIV recipients; no related SAEs were observed. Four of 10 LAIV recipients shed vaccine virus, with none exceeding 7-10 days duration. LAIV demonstrated modest immunogenicity by hemagglutination inhibition (≥4 fold rise for any strain, 33%) and microneutralization assays (≥4 fold rise for any strain, 44%).

Conclusion

In this small pilot study conducted in mild to moderately immunocompromised children with cancer, runny nose/nasal congestion was increased in LAIV recipients, no related SAEs occurred, and prolonged viral shedding was not detected. Moderate immunogenicity was demonstrated in this small group of individuals. (ClinTrials.gov: NCT00112112).     

Atopy history and the genomics of wheezing after influenza vaccination in children 6-59 months of age

Background

A multinational clinical trial compared the safety and efficacy of intranasal trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) with intramuscular trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in very young children prior to the 2004-5 influenza season [1]. Wheezing was noted more often in recipients of LAIV and laboratory-confirmed influenza infection was noted more often in recipients of TIV. We sought to determine whether epidemiologic or genetic factors were associated with these outcomes.

Methods

Atopy surveys and DNA collections were performed in trial participants at two United States sites, Nashville, TN and Boston, MA. DNA samples were genotyped on Illumina Infinium 610 or 660-Quad. Standard allelic tests of association were performed.

Results

At the Nashville and Boston sites, a total of 99 children completed the trial, 6 (1 TIV, 5 LAIV) developed medically attended wheezing within 42 days following vaccination, and 8 (5 TIV, 3 LAIV) developed laboratory-confirmed influenza during the season. Eighty-one surveys and 70 DNA samples were collected. Family history of asthma (p = 0.001) was associated with wheezing after vaccination. Of 468,458 single nucleotide polymorphisms tested in the genome-wide association study (GWAS), none achieved genome-wide significance for either wheezing after vaccination or laboratory-confirmed influenza infection.

Conclusions

Family history of asthma appears to be a risk factor for wheezing after influenza vaccination. Given the limitations of the sample size, our pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of performing a GWAS but was not able to determine genetic polymorphisms associated with wheezing after influenza immunization.     

A randomized, double-blind noninferiority study of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in adults

Background

Trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines contain 2 A strains and 1 B strain. B strains of 2 antigenically distinct lineages, Yamagata and Victoria, have been co-circulating annually, and the B strain included in vaccines often has not been a lineage match to the major circulating strain. Thus, a vaccine containing B strains from both lineages could broaden protection against influenza. Quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (Q/LAIV) is an investigational 4-strain formulation of LAIV that contains 2 A strains, A/H1N1 and A/H3N2, and 2 B strains, 1 from each lineage.

Methods

A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of Q/LAIV was conducted in 1800 adults aged 18-49 years to compare the immunogenicity and safety of Q/LAIV to trivalent LAIV (T/LAIV). Subjects were randomized 4:1:1 to receive an intranasal dose of Q/LAIV (n = 1200) or 1 of 2 matching T/LAIV vaccines, each containing 1 of the B strains included in Q/LAIV (n = 600 total). The primary endpoint was the comparison of the post-vaccination strain-specific geometric mean titers (GMT) of hemagglutination inhibition antibody in Q/LAIV recipients to those in T/LAIV recipients, with immunologic noninferiority of Q/LAIV to be demonstrated if the upper bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of the GMTs [T/LAIV divided by Q/LAIV] was ≤1.5 for all strains.

Results and Conclusion

Q/LAIV met the criteria for noninferiority: the ratios of the GMTs for the A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata, and B/Victoria strains were 1.09 (95% CI, 1.01-1.18), 1.05 (95% CI, 0.96-1.14), 1.10 (95% CI, 0.97-1.25), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.82-1.03), respectively. Solicited symptoms and adverse events were similar in the Q/LAIV and T/LAIV arms. Q/LAIV may confer increased protection against influenza by targeting B strains from both lineages.     

Vaccine effectiveness for laboratory-confirmed influenza in children 6-59 months of age, 2005-2007

To estimate the effectiveness of influenza vaccine against medical care visits for laboratory-confirmed influenza in young children we conducted a matched case-control study in children with acute respiratory illness or fever from 2005-2007. Influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated using cases with laboratory-confirmed influenza and controls who tested negative for influenza. The effectiveness of influenza vaccine in fully vaccinated children 6-59 months of age was 56% (95% CI: 25%-74%); a significant VE was not found for partial vaccination.     

The efficacy of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine in children 2 through 17 years of age: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled studies

Background

Nine randomized controlled clinical trials, including approximately 26,000 children aged 6 months to 17 years, have evaluated the efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) against culture-confirmed influenza illness compared with placebo or trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV). The objective of the current analysis was to integrate available LAIV efficacy data in children aged 2-17 years, the group for whom LAIV is approved for use.

Methods

A meta-analysis was conducted using all available randomized controlled trials and a fixed-effects model. Cases caused by drifted influenza B were analyzed as originally classified and with all antigenic variants classified as dissimilar.

Results

Five placebo-controlled trials (4 were 2-season trials) and 3 single-season TIV-controlled trials were analyzed. Compared with placebo, year 1 efficacy of 2 doses of LAIV was 83% (95% CI: 78, 87) against antigenically similar strains; efficacy was 87% (95% CI: 78, 93), 86% (95% CI: 79, 91), and 76% (95% CI: 63, 84) for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B, respectively. Classifying B variants as dissimilar, efficacy against all similar strains was 87% (95% CI: 83, 91) and 93% (95% CI: 83, 97) against similar B strains. Year 2 efficacy was 87% (95% CI: 82, 91) against similar strains. Compared with TIV, LAIV recipients experienced 44% (95% CI: 28, 56) and 48% (95% CI: 38, 57) fewer cases of influenza illness caused by similar strains and all strains, respectively. LAIV efficacy estimates for children from Europe, the United States, and Middle East were robust and were similar to or higher than those for the overall population.

Conclusions

In children aged 2-17 years, LAIV demonstrated high efficacy after 2 doses in year 1 and revaccination in year 2, and greater efficacy compared with TIV. This meta-analysis provides precise estimates of LAIV efficacy among the approved pediatric age group.     

A postmarketing evaluation of the safety of Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine in adults 18-49 years of age

Background

The Ann Arbor strain-live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was licensed in 2003 for use in the United States for individuals aged 5–49 years of age. As part of a postmarketing commitment to safety, LAIV was studied in adults 18–49 years participating in the Kaiser Permanente Health Plan over 5 influenza seasons.

Methods

Individuals received LAIV as part of routine care from October 2003 through March 2008. Using Kaiser Permanente databases, rates of medically attended events (MAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in LAIV recipients were compared with rates in multiple non-randomized control groups which included a self-control group, matched unvaccinated controls, and matched controls vaccinated with inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV).

Results

A total of 21,340, 18,316, and 21,340 subjects received LAIV, TIV and no vaccine, respectively. More than 5500 MAE incidence rate comparisons were performed, and of these, 257 (5%) yielded statistically significant differences with 72 and 185 occurring at a higher and lower rate after LAIV compared with control groups, respectively. The pattern of MAE rate differences did not suggest any safety signal associated with LAIV. There were 47 SAEs noted, and no individual SAE occurred at a significantly higher or lower rate in LAIV recipients relative to control groups in any comparison. Only 2 SAEs (migraine/sinusitis and Bell's palsy) were considered possibly or probably related to LAIV.

Conclusion

The results of this post-licensure evaluation of LAIV safety in individuals 18–49 years of age are consistent with pre- and post-approval clinical studies as well as reports to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, all of which demonstrated no significant adverse outcomes among eligible individuals following receipt of LAIV.     

Trends in U.S. pediatric influenza vaccination from 2006 to 2010 among children with private insurance

In the United States, recommendations for the annual influenza vaccination of children have expanded significantly in recent years. Additionally, to facilitate influenza vaccination delivery by providers, recent recommendations have encouraged vaccination as soon as vaccine is available and throughout the influenza season. However, until now, there have been limited data published describing pediatric providers’ responses to these recent recommendations. De-identified, patient-level data from an electronic health care reimbursement claims database that contains more than 60% of all medical claims from outpatient settings in the US were analyzed. Only claims from privately insured children were available; administration of federally purchased vaccine (i.e., via the Vaccines for Children program) and vaccinations administered in settings where claims data are not generated were not captured. Weekly counts of influenza vaccinations administered to children 6 months through 18 years of age between August 1 and March 31 for the 2006-2007 through 2009-2010 seasons were projected to yield national estimates. Seasonal vaccination peaked in November for the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 seasons, October for the 2008-2009 season, and September for the 2009-2010 season. The proportion of vaccinations administered before November 1 increased each season from 2006-2007 through 2009-2010. In all seasons, vaccination dramatically declined in December and continued at a steadily declining rate through the end of the season. Vaccine delivery to children 6-23 months of age was more dispersed over the vaccination season relative to older age groups. Among children 6-23 months and 2-18 years of age, use of preservative-free inactivated vaccine and live attenuated vaccine, respectively, increased significantly over the study period. While pediatric influenza vaccination occurred earlier each year, vaccination in later months has not increased in recent seasons, despite efforts to extend the vaccination season.     

Inactivated and live, attenuated influenza vaccines protect mice against influenza: Streptococcus pyogenes super-infections

Mortality associated with influenza virus super-infections is frequently due to secondary bacterial complications. To date, super-infections with Streptococcus pyogenes have been studied less extensively than those associated with Streptococcus pneumoniae. This is significant because a vaccine for S. pyogenes is not clinically available, leaving vaccination against influenza virus as our only means for preventing these super-infections. In this study, we directly compared immunity induced by two types of influenza vaccine, either inactivated influenza virus (IIV) or live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV), for the ability to prevent super-infections. Our data demonstrate that both IIV and LAIV vaccines induce similar levels of serum antibodies, and that LAIV alone induces IgA expression at mucosal surfaces. Upon super-infection, both vaccines have the ability to limit the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines within the lung, including IFN-γ which has been shown to contribute to mortality in previous models of super-infection. Limiting expression of these pro-inflammatory cytokines within the lungs subsequently limits recruitment of macrophages and neutrophils to pulmonary surfaces, and ultimately protects both IIV- and LAIV-vaccinated mice from mortality. Despite their overall survival, both IIV- and LAIV-vaccinated mice demonstrated levels of bacteria within the lung tissue that are similar to those seen in unvaccinated mice. Thus, influenza virus:bacteria super-infections can be limited by vaccine-induced immunity against influenza virus, but the ability to prevent morbidity is not complete.     

A prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing the safety and efficacy of trivalent live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in adults 60 years of age and older

Background

Although influenza is a major public health concern among adults ≥60 years of age, few large, prospective studies of influenza vaccines have been conducted in this population. The goal of the present study was to directly compare the safety and efficacy of LAIV and TIV in adults ≥60 years of age.

Materials and methods

A prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted in South Africa. In March-April 2002, 3009 community-dwelling ambulatory adults 60-95 years of age were randomized 1:1 to receive a single dose of LAIV or TIV. Surveillance for influenza illness was conducted through November. Serum antibody titers were evaluated in all participants, and interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay responses were evaluated in a cohort of subjects. Solicited reactogenicity and adverse events were monitored for days 0-10 postvaccination; serious adverse events were monitored for the entire study.

Results

Influenza illness caused by vaccine-matched strains was detected in 0.8% (12/1494) and 0.5% (8/1488) of LAIV and TIV recipients, respectively; the relative efficacy of LAIV vs TIV was −49% (95% CI: −259, 35). As expected, greater serum antibody responses were seen with TIV, and greater cellular responses were seen with LAIV (although not for influenza B). Among subjects with culture-confirmed influenza illness, post hoc analyses revealed trends toward less feverishness (LAIV, 14%; TIV, 46%; P = 0.05) and less fever (LAIV, 9%; TIV, 31%; P = 0.16) among LAIV recipients. In each treatment group, 38-39% and 24-25% of subjects had baseline hemagglutination inhibition titers of ≤4 for A/H1 and A/H3, but 7 of 8 TIV cases and 7 of 12 LAIV cases of matched-strain influenza occurred among these subjects. Runny nose/nasal congestion (+13%), cough (+5%), sore throat (+5%), lethargy (+3%), and decreased appetite (+2%) were reported by more LAIV vs TIV recipients. Injection site reactions were reported by 27% of TIV recipients. SAEs were reported by a similar proportion of LAIV and TIV recipients (9% vs 8%).

Conclusions

Given the low incidence of influenza in both groups, no conclusions were possible regarding the relative efficacy of LAIV and TIV. There was a trend toward less feverishness/fever among LAIV recipients who developed influenza compared with TIV recipients with influenza, consistent with results from studies comparing the vaccines in children. A disproportionate number of influenza illnesses occurred among baseline seronegative subjects, particularly for those receiving TIV, which suggests that this subgroup has the greatest need for improved influenza vaccination. The safety profiles of LAIV and TIV were consistent with results from previous studies in older adults and no significant safety concerns were identified.clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00192413.     

Efficacy of inactivated vaccine against H5N1 influenza virus infection in mice with type 1 diabetes

We sought to determine susceptibility to highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus and to explore immune protection of inactivated H5N1 vaccine in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic mice. Susceptibility of diabetic mice to an H5N1 virus was evaluated by comparing the median lethal dose (LD₅₀) and the lung virus titers with those of the healthy after the viral infection. To evaluate the influence of diabetes on vaccination, diabetic and healthy mice were immunized once with an inactivated H5N1 vaccine and then challenged with a lethal dose of H5N1 virus. The antibody responses, survival rates, lung virus titers and body weight changes were tested. Mice with type 1 diabetes had higher lung virus titers and lower survival rates than healthy mice after H5N1 virus infection. Inactivated H5N1 vaccine induced protective antibody in diabetic mice, but the antibody responses were postponed and weakened. In spite of this, diabetic mice could be protected against the lethal virus challenge by a single dose of immunization when the amount of the antigen increased. These results indicated that type 1 diabetic mice were more susceptible to H5N1 influenza virus infection than healthy mice, and can be effectively protected by inactivated H5N1 vaccine with increased antigen.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in adults 70 years of age and older previously vaccinated with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine

Background

The currently recommended single dose of the 23-valent pneumococcal free polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) for adults 65 years of age and older does not provide extended protection into older age. This reflects a significant unmet medical need for alternative strategies to protect older adults against pneumococcal infection, which may be met by the 13-valent polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PCV13).

Methods

We performed a randomized, modified double-blind trial in 936 adults aged 70 years and older who had previously received PPSV23 at least 5 years before study entry and were now vaccinated with PCV13 or PPSV23. At 1 year after enrollment, all subjects received a follow-on dose of PCV13. Anti-pneumococcal opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers were measured before and at 1 month after each vaccination.

Results

Following the enrollment vaccination, OPA titers were significantly greater in the PCV13 group compared to the PPSV23 group for 10 of the 12 serotypes common to both vaccines and to serotype 6A which is unique to PCV13. Responses were noninferior for the other 2 common serotypes. Responses to PCV13 given at 1 year were generally lower in the group that received PPSV23 at enrollment.

Conclusion

In adults aged 70 years and older previously vaccinated with PPSV23, PCV13 was significantly more immunogenic than PPSV23 for most of the common serotypes and for serotype 6A. The OPA responses after a follow-on dose of PCV13 one year later indicate that a prior dose of PPSV23, but not PCV13, diminishes the response to the subsequent administration of PCV13.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2a study of the safety and immunogenicity of a live, attenuated human parainfluenza virus type 3 vaccine in healthy infants

Objective

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and viral shedding profiles of a recombinant, live, attenuated human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPIV3) vaccine, rHPIV3cp45, in healthy HPIV3-seronegative infants 6 to <12 months of age.

Methods

In this double-blind, multicenter study, subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive a 10⁵ TCID₅₀ dose of rHPIV3cp45 (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) at enrollment and at 2 and 4 months after the first dose. Blood for evaluation of antibody to HPIV3 was collected at baseline and approximately 1 month after each dose. Solicited adverse events (SEs) and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected on days 0-28 after each dose. Nasal wash samples for vaccine virus shedding were collected 3 times after each dose (7-10, 12-18, and 28-34 days post dose) and at unscheduled illness visits. Subjects were followed for 180 days after the last dose.

Results

Vaccine virus was shed by 85% of vaccine recipients after dose 1, by 1 subject after dose 2, and was not shed by any subject after dose 3. The highest titer of shed virus was detected on day 7 after dose 1. The attenuation phenotype and the genotype of the vaccine virus were stable in shed virus. Seroresponse (≥4-fold rise in HPIV3 antibody from baseline) occurred in 61% of subjects after dose 1 and in 77% after dose 3. Either seroresponse or shedding occurred in 95% of vaccine subjects. Adverse events were similar in vaccine and placebo recipients.

Conclusion

The safety, shedding, and immunogenicity profiles of rHPIV3cp45 in HPIV3-seronegative infants 6 to <12 months of age support further development of this vaccine.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00508651.     

Effects of immunizing school children with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine on absenteeism among students and teachers in Maine

The overall and indirect effects of immunizing school children with influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic virus vaccine prior to and during the peak of virus circulation were evaluated on student and teacher school absenteeism. We used records collected from late 2009 through early 2010 from schools in four Maine counties. Mixed logistic regression models were used to estimate the daily association between school-level immunization coverage and absenteeism by level of influenza activity, after adjusting for the proportion of students receiving reduced-cost lunches, student minority status, absences adjacent to weekends and Thanksgiving, rural school location, and the circulation of other respiratory viruses. Increasing student immunization coverage was associated with reduced absenteeism during periods of high influenza activity. For example, as immunization coverage during the peak week of pandemic virus circulation increased from 38% to 69% (the 10th and 90th percentiles of observed coverage, respectively), relative reductions in daily absenteeism among all students, unimmunized students, and teachers were 8.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5, 9.9), 5.7% (95% CI: 4.2, 7.3), and 8.7% (95% CI: 1.3, 16), respectively. Increased vaccination coverage among school-aged Maine children had modest overall and indirect effects on student and teacher absenteeism, despite vaccination occurring just prior and during peak pandemic virus circulation.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children 6–59 months of age: A phase 3, randomized,noninferiority study

Background

In the Southern Hemisphere 2010 influenza season, Seqirus’ split-virion, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine was associated with increased reports of fevers and febrile reactions in young children. A staged clinical development program of a quadrivalent vaccine (Seqirus IIV4 [S-IIV4]; Afluria® Quadrivalent/Afluria Quad?/Afluria Tetra?), wherein each vaccine strain is split using a higher detergent concentration to reduce lipid content (considered the cause of the increased fevers and febrile reactions), is now complete.

Influenza vaccine for pregnant women in resource-constrained countries: a review of the evidence to inform policy decisions

Seasonal influenza is responsible for three to five million severe cases of disease annually, and up to 500,000 deaths worldwide. Pregnant women and infants suffer disproportionately from severe outcomes of influenza. The excellent safety profile and reliable immunogenicity of inactivated influenza vaccine support WHO recommendations that pregnant women be vaccinated to decrease complications of influenza disease during pregnancy. Nevertheless, influenza vaccine is not routinely used in most low-and middle-income countries and is not widely used in pregnant women worldwide.Two recent prospective, controlled trials of maternal influenza vaccination in Bangladesh and US Native American reservations demonstrated that inactivated influenza vaccine given to pregnant women can decrease laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in their newborn children. These studies support consideration of the feasibility of targeted influenza vaccine programs in resource-constrained countries.Platforms exist for the delivery of influenza vaccine to pregnant women worldwide. Even in the least developed countries, an estimated 70% of women receive antenatal care, providing an opportunity for targeted influenza vaccination. Challenges to the introduction of maternal influenza vaccination in resource-constrained countries exist, including issues regarding vaccine formulation, availability, and cost. Nonetheless, maternal influenza vaccination remains an important and potentially cost-effective approach to decrease influenza morbidity in two high-risk groups - pregnant women and young infants.     

A study to evaluate the immunogenicity and shedding of live attenuated influenza vaccine strains in children 24–<48 months of age

BackgroundQuadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) showed reduced effectiveness against the A/H1N1 component in the 2013–2014 and 2015–2016 influenza seasons. The most likely cause of reduced LAIV effectiveness against A(H1N1)pdm09 strains was poor intranasal replication.ObjectivesTo compare the immunogenicity and shedding of a new A/H1N1 strain (A/Slovenia), to a A/H1N1 strain known to have reduced effectiveness (A/Bolivia).Patients/methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Children aged 24–<48 months of age were randomized 1:1:1 to receive two doses of LAIV4 2017–2018 (LAIV4_A/Slovenia), or LAIV4 2015–2016 or trivalent LAIV (LAIV3) 2015–2016 formulations (LAIV4_A/Bolivia or LAIV3_A/Bolivia, respectively) on days 1 and 28. The primary endpoint was strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody seroresponse at 28 days post each dose, and secondary endpoints included immunogenicity, shedding, and safety. Solicited symptoms, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded. Pre-specified statistical testing was limited to the primary endpoint of HAI antibody responses.ResultsA total of 200 children were randomized (median age 35.3 months; 53% male; 57% had previously received influenza vaccine). Significantly higher HAI antibody responses for the A/Slovenia strain were observed after Dose 1 and Dose 2. Neutralizing antibodies and nasal immunoglobulin A antibody responses were higher for A/Slovenia versus A/Bolivia. More children shed the A/Slovenia vaccine strain than the A/Bolivia strain on Days 4–7 after Dose 1. No deaths, SAEs, or discontinuations from vaccine occurred.ConclusionsThe new A(H1N1)pdm09 A/Slovenia LAIV strain demonstrated improved immunogenicity compared with a previous strain with reduced effectiveness and induced immune responses comparable to a highly efficacious pre-pandemic H1N1 LAIV strain. These results support the use of LAIV4 containing A/Slovenia as a vaccine option in clinical practice.     

Cost effectiveness analysis of elementary school-located vaccination against influenza—Results from a randomized controlled trial

School-located vaccination against influenza (SLV-I) has been suggested to help meet the need for annual vaccination of large numbers of school-aged children with seasonal influenza vaccine. However, little is known about the cost and cost-effectiveness of SLV-I. We conducted a cost-analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an SLV-I program implemented in Monroe County, New York during the 2009–2010 vaccination season. We hypothesized that SLV-I is more cost effective, or less-costly, compared to a conventional, office-located influenza vaccination delivery. First and second SLV-I clinics were offered in 21 intervention elementary schools (n = 9027 children) with standard of care (no SLV-I) in 11 control schools (n = 4534 children). The direct costs, to purchase and administer vaccines, were estimated from our RCT. The effectiveness measure, receipt of ≥1 dose of influenza vaccine, was 13.2 percentage points higher in SLV-I schools than control schools. The school costs ($9.16/dose in 2009 dollars) plus project costs ($23.00/dose) plus vendor costs excluding vaccine purchase ($19.89/dose) was higher in direct costs ($52.05/dose) than the previously reported mean/median cost [$38.23/$21.44 per dose] for providing influenza vaccination in pediatric practices. However SLV-I averted parent costs to visit medical practices ($35.08 per vaccine). Combining direct and averted costs through Monte Carlo Simulation, SLV-I costs were $19.26/dose in net costs, which is below practice-based influenza vaccination costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated to be $92.50 or $38.59 (also including averted parent costs). When additionally accounting for the costs averted by disease prevention (i.e., both reduced disease transmission to household members and reduced loss of productivity from caring for a sick child), the SLV-I model appears to be cost-saving to society, compared to “no vaccination”. Our findings support the expanded implementation of SLV-I, but also the need to focus on efficient delivery to reduce direct costs.     

Influence of initial vaccination with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine on anti-pneumococcal responses following subsequent pneumococcal vaccination in adults 50 years and older

Background

Unlike free polysaccharide vaccines, pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccines (PCVs) induce a T cell-dependent immune response and have the potential to provide an extended duration of protection with repeated vaccinations.

Methods

This was an extension of a previous study in pneumococcal vaccine-naïve adults aged 50–64 years in which adults 60–64 years of age were given 13-valent PCV (PCV13) or 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and adults aged 50–59 were given PCV13. In this follow up study conducted about 4 years later, the 60–64 year olds initially given PCV13 received PCV13 or PPSV23, and those initially given PPSV23 received another PPSV23. All adults aged 50–59 years were re-vaccinated with PCV13. Anti-pneumococcal opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers were measured before and 1 month after vaccination.

Results

A second PCV13 given about 4 years after a first vaccination induced OPA titers that were significantly higher than those following the initial vaccination for 7 of 13 serotypes in the older group, and 6 of 13 serotypes in the younger group, and responses to the remaining serotypes were largely non-inferior. In contrast, OPA titers following revaccination with PPSV23 were statistically significantly lower for 9 of the 13 serotypes, and non-inferior for the remaining serotypes, when compared to the responses to the first PPSV23. OPA titers in the older adults who received PPSV23 after initial PCV13 were significantly higher than those following a first PPSV23 for 10 of the 13 serotypes.

Conclusion

In adults 50 to 64 years of age, initial vaccination with PCV13 establishes an immune state that results in recall anti-pneumococcal responses upon subsequent vaccination with either conjugated or free polysaccharide vaccine. In contrast, initial vaccination with PPSV23 results in an immune state in which subsequent PPSV23 administration yields generally lower responses compared with the initial responses.     

Modification of the vaccine manufacturing process improves the pyrogenicity profile of inactivated influenza vaccines in young children

Background

There were increased reports of fevers and febrile reactions in young children (particularly children aged <5?years) receiving the Seqirus/CSL Southern Hemisphere 2010 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3). Modifying the vaccine manufacturing process by increasing the minimum concentration of splitting agent (sodium taurodeoxycholate [TDOC]) from 0.5% w/v to 1.5% w/v for all strains resolved this issue. The current analysis compared fever rates in three pediatric studies of Seqirus IIV3 (S-IIV3) or quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (S-IIV4), prepared using the modified manufacturing process, with fever rates in three pediatric studies of historical (pre-2010) IIV3 formulations. The historical IIV3 formulations, S-IIV3, and S-IIV4 had 0/3, 2/3, and 4/4 vaccine strains split at 1.5% TDOC, respectively.