Effect of pamidronate administration on bone in patients with acute spinal cord injury

Eleven subjects participated in a prospective placebo-controlled trial to address the efficacy of pamidronate in reducing bone loss in persons with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). We administered pamidronate (treatment) or normal saline (placebo) intravenously at baseline (22 to 65 days after injury) and sequentially over 12 months, with follow-up at 18 and 24 months. Regional bone mineral density (BMD) was lost over time, regardless of group. In the treatment group compared with the placebo group, we noted a mild early reduction in loss of total leg BMD. Significant bone loss from baseline occurred earlier in the placebo group at the regional sites than in the treatment group. However, by the end of the treatment and follow-up phases, both groups demonstrated a similar percent bone loss from baseline. Despite an early reduction in bone loss, pamidronate failed to prevent major, long-term bone loss in persons with acute neurologically complete SCI.     

Comparison of biochemical markers of bone remodelling in the assessment of the effects of alendronate on bone in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The effects of alendronate treatment on biochemical markers of bone remodelling and bone mineral density (BMD) were studied in 30 Caucasian women (postmenopausal for at least 3 years, age 42-76 years, with BMD of the lumbar spine at least 2 S.D. below the mean for mature, premenopausal women). The patients were randomly assigned to receive alendronate (10 mg/day) or placebo for 12 months (double blind). The study was subsequently extended to a second year of open alendronate treatment. The treatment with alendronate resulted in a significant and progressive increase in BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Under the treatment, the maximal decrease of biochemical markers of bone remodelling (osteocalcin in plasma, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen in serum, and cross-linked amino-terminal N-telopeptide and total hydroxyproline in urine) was observed at 6 months with no further change during the 2-year period. There were no significant differences in discriminating between patients treated for 1 year with alendronate or placebo using either the percentage change in spine BMD at month 12, or a single measurement of the marker at month 6, or log (percent of baseline at month 6 of value of the marker). In this respect, the power of all the biochemical markers were comparable. The markers are a valuable adjunct to the measurements of BMD, especially in the patients not showing an increase of 3% or more at the lumbar spine BMD after 1 year of treatment.     

Misoprostol and Prednisone Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

Fourteen patients were enrolled in a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial of 8 weeks of treatment for active lupus nephritis. Seven patients received prednisone at a dose of 1 mg kg(minus sign1) day(minus sign1) plus misoprostol at a dose of 200 &mgr;g P.O. Q.I.D.; 7 patients received prednisone plus placebo. The patients included 12 females, 2 males; 3 African-Americans, 3 Asians, 5 Hispanics, and 3 Caucasians. There were no serious side effects associated with prednisone or misoprostol treatment during the 8-week study period. Laboratory measures obtained at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks included complete blood count (CBC), ESR, C reactive protein (CRP), serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, 24-h urine protein excretion, C3, C4, and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA). Statistical analysis was conducted assessing change in measures over time in the entire study group by paired t-tests. The effect of treatment on change over time was examined by analysis of covariance. Log transformation of the variables was performed prior to statistical analysis. For the entire study group, the mean levels of ESR, CRP, 24-h protein excretion, C3, C4, and anti-dsDNA were improved at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The mean ESR at baseline was 70 plus minus 8 compared to 42 plus minus 8 at 12 weeks (p < 0.01). The mean CRP at baseline was 0.6 plus minus 0.2 compared to 0.2 plus minus 0.1 at 12 weeks (p < 0.01). The 24-h protein excretion was 4367 plus minus 769 mg at baseline compared to 2512 plus minus 709 mg at 12 weeks (p = 0.02). The mean C3 at baseline was 40 plus minus 4 mg dl(minus sign1) compared to 60 plus minus 4 mg dl(minus sign1) at 12 weeks (p < 0.01). The mean C4 at baseline was 14 plus minus 1 mg dl(minus sign1) compared to 23 plus minus 2 mg dl(minus sign1) at 12 weeks (p < 0.01). The mean anti-dsDNA at baseline was 4268 plus minus 1780 compared to 316 plus minus 111 at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). The baseline serum creatinine (1.12 plus minus.15 mg dl(minus sign1)) and creatinine clearance (82 plus minus 15 ml min(minus sign1)) were not significantly changed at 12 weeks (1.10 plus minus 0.2 mg dl(minus sign1) and 80 plus minus 17 ml min(minus sign1), respectively). Comparing the misoprostol treatment group to the placebo group, there were no statistically significant differences for ESR, CRP, creatinine, creatinine clearance, 24-h protein excretion, C3, C4, or anti-dsDNA at any time points. However, comparing the misoprostol treatment group at 4 weeks to the placebo group, a more rapid decrease in anti-dsDNA (reduction of 3297 plus minus 2374) was observed in the misoprostol treatment group versus 304 plus minus 409 in the placebo group), as well as lower mean anti-dsDNA levels (464 plus minus 140) in the misoprostol treatment group versus 4118 plus minus 3834 in the placebo group). Also, the C3 and C4 levels at 12 weeks in the misoprostol treatment group (67 plus minus 5 and 27 plus minus 3 mg dl(minus sign1), respectively) were greater than levels in the placebo group (52 plus minus 4 and 19 plus minus 3 mg dl(minus sign1), respectively). The data demonstrate that oral prednisone is effective in reducing proteinuria and improving the biological markers of disease activity (i.e., ESR, CRP, C3, C4, and anti-dsDNA) following short-term treatment of active lupus nephritis. Additionally, the more rapid change in anti-dsDNA levels and superior normalization of complement levels in the treatment group, although not statistically significant, are consistent with a biologic effect of misoprostol on lymphocyte function and the production of a pathogenic autoantibodies.     

Biochemical markers of bone turnover and response of bone mineral density to intervention in early postmenopausal women: an experience in a clinical laboratory

BACKGROUND: Markers of bone formation and resorption may be useful as early indicators of response to therapy. Our aim in this study was to investigate the use of bone markers for monitoring of intervention for bone loss in early postmenopausal women and to assess the relationships between these markers and changes in bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to the following groups: a control group; a group receiving calcium alone; groups receiving calcium plus low or conventional doses of conjugated equine estrogen; and groups receiving calcium plus low or conventional doses of calcitriol. At baseline and at 1 and 3 months after intervention, we measured serum intact osteocalcin, serum N-terminal midfragment osteocalcin, serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), urinary deoxypyridinoline cross-links, and urinary CTX: The BMD of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck was measured at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. RESULTS: No marker changed significantly in the control group except urinary CTx, which increased at 3 months. Serum CTx decreased in all regimens at 1 or 3 months of intervention. In addition, the changes of all markers at 3 months were inversely associated with the change in the BMD of the lumbar spine at 1 or 2 years (r = -0.144 to -0.314), whereas only the changes of bone resorption markers at 3 months were inversely correlated with the changes in femoral BMD at 1 or 2 years (r = -0.143 to -0.366). CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical markers of bone turnover appear to be of use in assessing early response to therapy. Bone resorption markers, especially serum CTx, are better indicators than bone formation markers for estimating the response to intervention in early postmenopausal women. However, the early changes in bone markers were weakly related to the later changes in BMD.     

Parathyroid hormone treatment can reverse corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis is the most common secondary cause of osteoporosis. We conducted a 12-mo, randomized clinical trial of human parathyroid hormone 1-34 (hPTH 1-34) in postmenopausal women (mean age was 63 yr) with osteoporosis who were taking corticosteroids and hormone replacement therapy. Response to the treatment was assessed with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography (QCT); BMD measurements of the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); and biochemical markers of bone turnover. The mean (+/-SE) changes in BMD of the lumbar spine by QCT and DXA in the PTH group were 35+/-5.5% and 11+/-1.4%, respectively, compared with a relatively small change of 1.7+/-1.8% and 0+/-0.9% in the estrogen-only group. The differences in mean percentage between the groups at 1 yr were 33.5% for the lumbar spine by QCT (P < 0.001) and 9.8% for the lumbar spine by DXA (P < 0.001). The changes in the hip and forearm were not significantly different between or within the groups. During the first 3 mo of PTH treatment, markers of bone formation increased to nearly 150%, whereas markers of bone resorption increased only 100%, suggesting an early uncoupling of bone turnover in favor of formation. These results suggest that parathyroid hormone dramatically increases bone mass in the central skeleton of postmenopausal women with corticosteroid- induced osteoporosis who are taking hormone replacement.     

利维爱对绝经后妇女骨密度及骨代谢指标的影响

目的了解利维爱对绝经后妇女骨密度及骨代谢指标的影响 . 方法将 123例自然绝经后妇女随机分 2组 研究组每日口服利维爱 1.25 mg+ 钙尔奇 D 600 mg, 对照组每日口服钙尔奇 D 600 mg, 观察 12个月 . 用药前后分别检测腰椎 (L 2～ 4)及股骨颈 (NK)骨密度 (BMD)骨代谢指标血清骨钙素 (BGP)和碱性磷酸酶 (AKP)及尿吡啶酚 /肌酐 (Pyr/cr)和钙 /肌酐 (Ca/Cr)比值 . 结果 (1)L 2～ 4、 NK两部位 BMD 研究组治疗后均增加 , 且前者上升有显著性差异 (P< 0.05);对照组均下降无显著性差异 (P >0.05);治疗后 2组间比较有显著性差异 (P< 0.01,P< 0.05). (2)生化指标血 BGP、 AKP及尿 Pyr/Cr、 Ca/Cr 治疗后研究组均上升有显著性差异 (P< 0.01,P< 0.05); 对照组变化无显著性差异 (P >0.05). 结论绝经后妇女每日服用 1.25 mg利维爱加钙尔奇 D可以提高骨量 ; 单用钙尔奇 D不能防止骨丢失 .     

Enhancement of Calcium/Vitamin D Supplement Efficacy by Administering Concomitantly Three Key Nutrients Essential to Bone Collagen Matrix for the Treatment of Osteopenia in Middle-Aged Women: A One-Year Follow-Up

Two vitamins and proline (CB₆Pro), three nutrients essential for bone collagen, were used in combination to a 1000 mg calcium/250 IU vitamin D (Ca/D) daily supplement to treat osteopenia as a preventive measure against osteoporosis later in life. Middle-aged women not using estrogen were screened for osteopenia using the WHO criteria and divided into three groups (n = 20 each): 1) placebo healthy controls with normal bone mineral density (BMD); 2) control Ca/D-treated osteopenic patients; and 3) Ca/D + CB₆Pro-treated osteopenic patients. The three groups were comparable at baseline except for BMD. After one-year treatment, cortical diaphyseal BMD remained constant in each group, but trabecular bone loss persisted (at 5 lumbar sites) in osteopenic group 2. No further bone loss was detected in osteopenic group 3. A loss of 2% was evidenced in the placebo group at one lumbar site. Markers of bone formation (which increase in coupling to resorption) decreased significantly in both osteopenic groups. Although biomarkers of resorption did not change, hormone (PTH and 1,25(OH)₂D₃)-induced osteoclastic activity was significantly reduced. No decline in BMD occurred at any bone site in osteopenic group 3, highlighting the importance of improving the quality of bone matrix concomitantly to mineral replacement.     

Utility of biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in management of osteoporosis

Biochemical markers of bone turnover (bone-turnover markers) are released during bone formation or resorption and can be measured in blood and/or urine. The concentration of bone-turnover markers in serum or urine reflect bone remodeling activity and can potentially be used as surrogate markers of the rate of bone formation or bone resorption. While the diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on bone mineral density (BMD), the absolute fracture risk for a particular BMD measurement varies several fold depending on age and is also influenced by other clinical risk factors. The measurement of bone-turnover markers may be of additional value to BMD and clinical risk factors in fracture risk assessment by improving the sensitivity and specificity of prediction of future fractures. In clinical practice, bone-turnover markers may help make cost-effective treatment decisions in patients with borderline absolute risk. BMD changes following treatment cannot be detected with confidence for 12-24 months due to measurement imprecision. Bone-turnover markers, which show an early response following treatment, may be useful for monitoring therapy, identifying non-compliance and non-responders, and predicting early response to therapy. This review concludes by identifying the need for internationally agreed-upon standards for bone resorption and formation.     

The effect of clodronate on bone mineral density and serum osteocalcin in postmenopausal women with osteopenia - a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Background. The efficacy of bisphosphonates in treatment of established osteoporosis has been well-documented; less data have been published on their efficacy in the prophylaxis of postmenopausal bone loss in women with osteopenia. The aim of study was to evaluate the effect of clodronate on bone loss in early postmenopausal women with vertebral osteopenia. Materials and methods. Forty five women aged 52.3+/-3.8 yr with a lumbar spine (Spine) t-score between -1 and -2.5 SD received clodronate 400 mg/day or placebo for 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA in Spine and femoral neck (Femur). Serum osteocalcin (OC) was assessed by RIA. BMD and OC were measured at the baseline, after 1 year of treatment and after further 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Results. BMD slightly decreased in clodronate group: Spine by 0.2% after 1 year (N.S.), 0.5% after 2 years (N.S.) and 0.9% after 3 years (P<0.05 vs. placebo group); Femur by 0.2%, 0.9% and 1.3% (N.S.). OC did not change in placebo group but significantly decreased in clodronate group (15.2%; P<0.05). Conclusions. Clodronate 400 mg daily given postmenopausal women with osteopenia is effective in decreasing OC but an effect on BMD is just detectable and its clinical significance is unclear.     

Bone effects of canagliflozin,a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor,in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), lowers blood glucose by inhibiting renal glucose reabsorption and increasing urinary glucose excretion. It has been reported that SGLT2 inhibitors may have potential adverse effects on bone, including increased fracture risk and decreased bone mineral density (BMD). Across clinical studies, canagliflozin was not associated with meaningful changes in serum or urine calcium, vitamin D, or parathyroid hormone. Minimal increases in serum phosphate and magnesium that were within normal limits were seen with canagliflozin versus placebo. Canagliflozin was associated with increases in serum collagen type 1 beta-carboxy telopeptide (beta-CTX), a bone resorption marker, and osteocalcin, a bone formation marker. Decreases in total hip BMD were seen with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo after 2 years (–1.7%, –2.1%, –0.8%; differences of –0.9% and –1.2%), but not at other skeletal sites (normal age-related bone loss, ~0.5-1.0%/year). Changes in beta-CTX and total hip BMD were significantly associated with weight loss, which is known to increase bone resorption markers and decrease BMD. Canagliflozin was associated with a higher fracture incidence in an interim analysis of the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) in patients with a history or high risk of cardiovascular disease (incidence per 100 patient-years of 1.6, 1.6, and 1.1 with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg and placebo), but not in other clinical studies of patients with T2DM. Fractures tended to occur as early as 12 weeks after initiating treatment and were primarily located in the distal parts of the upper and lower extremities. The reason for increased fracture risk with canagliflozin treatment is unknown, but is likely not related to a direct effect of canagliflozin on bone-related biomarkers. Data from ongoing canagliflozin studies, including CANVAS, will provide additional information on fracture risk in patients with T2DM.     

Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate (150 mg) and once-weekly oral alendronate (70 mg): Additional results from the monthly oral therapy with ibandronate for osteoporosis intervention (MOTION) study

Background: The MOTION (Monthly Oral Therapy with Ibandronate for Osteoporosis Intervention) study reported that once-monthly ibandronate was noninferior to once-weekly alendronate in terms of increasing bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip over 12 months. On analysis of secondary and exploratory end points in MOTION, which included trochanter and femoral neck BMD, monthly ibandronate was found to be noninferior to weekly alendronate. The coprimary, secondary, and exploratory BMD end points from MOTION have been previously reported.Objective: This report presents additional results from the MOTION study, including response rates in terms of lumbar spine and total hip BMD gains above baseline; findings from a comparison of serum concentrations of bone turnover markers; and tolerability analysis, including adverse events that led to withdrawal and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events.Methods: MOTION was a 12-month (with 15-day follow-up), randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, nonin-feriority study in postmenopausal women aged 55 to <85 years with osteoporosis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 150-mg-monthly oral ibandronate and weekly alendronate-matched placebo, or 70-mg-weekly oral alendronate and monthly ibandronate-matched placebo, for 12 months. At baseline, day 7 of treatment, 3 and 6 months, 6 months + 7 days, and 12 months, serum concentrations of markers of bone resorption (C-telopeptide of the a chain of type 1 collagen [sCTX]) and bone formation (serum N-terminal propeptides of type 1 collagen) were measured in a subset of the total trial population. At baseline and month 12, BMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Exploratory analyses of patients whose spine, total hip, and trochanter BMD at 12 months were above baseline (responders) were also performed.Results: A total of 1760 women were enrolled (ibandronate, 887 patients; alendronate, 873). The median changes in the trough concentrations of sCTX were ?75.5% with monthly ibandronate and ?81.2% with weekly alendronate. The percentage of patients with mean lumbar spine and total hip BMD gains above baseline (responders) were 90% and 87%, respectively, for ibandronate and 92% and 90%, respectively, for alendronate. GI adverse events were reported in ≤30% of patients per group during this 1-year study.Conclusion: The data from these postmenopausal women with osteoporosis suggest that once-monthly 150-mg ibandronate therapy provided clinically comparable efficacy in terms of BMD response, reductions in bone turnover, and GI tolerability similar to that of weekly 70-mg alendronate.     

A comparison of the effect of alendronate and risedronate on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: 24-month results from FACTS-International

Objectives: To compare alendronate 70 mg once weekly (OW) with risedronate 35 mg OW with respect to change in bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical markers and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tolerability over 24 months. Methods: This was a 12‐month extension to the Fosamax^® Actonel^® Comparison Trial international study (FACTS). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis randomly assigned to either alendronate 70 mg OW or risedronate 35 mg OW for the 12‐month base study continued taking the same double‐blind study medication. Efficacy measurements were BMD at the hip trochanter, lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck and levels of four bone turnover markers at 24 months. The primary hypothesis was that alendronate would produce a greater mean per cent increase from baseline in hip trochanter BMD at 24 months. Results: Trochanter BMD increased significantly from baseline to month 24 in both groups, with a significantly larger increase with alendronate: adjusted mean treatment difference of 1.50% (95% confidence interval: 0.74%, 2.26%; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen at all BMD sites. Significant geometric mean per cent decreases (p < 0.001) from baseline were seen for all four bone turnover markers in both groups, with significantly larger decreases (p < 0.001) with alendronate: adjusted mean treatment differences ranged from 8.9% to 25.3%. No significant differences were seen in incidence of UGI or other adverse events. Conclusions: Alendronate 70 mg OW yielded significantly greater BMD gains and larger decreases in bone turnover marker levels than risedronate 35 mg OW over 24 months, with no difference in UGI tolerability.     

Effects of alendronate and risedronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in late postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

This study was undertaken to compare the effects of alendronate and risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) in late postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Thirty women older than 60 y of age were randomly assigned to receive alendronate 10 mg (n=16) or risedronate 5 mg (n=14) on a daily basis. The patients were followed every 3 mo for 12 mo. BMD measurements were taken at baseline and at the end of the study, and BTMs were measured at 3-mo intervals. By the end of the study, there were statistically significant increases in BMD in both groups at all sites at which they were measured (P < .001). However, these differences were not statistically significant between groups. By the end of the study, all BTMs had decreased significantly and to a similar extent in both groups. The most significant change was observed in the third month of the study. A negative correlation was noted between percentage change in bonespecific alkaline phosphatase and femoral neck BMD (r=-0.467). This study reported no difference between the 2 drugs in their effects on BMD and BTMs.     

Calcium-enriched foods and bone mass growth in prepubertal girls: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

High calcium intake during childhood has been suggested to increase bone mass accrual, potentially resulting in a greater peak bone mass. Whether the effects of calcium supplementation on bone mass accrual vary from one skeletal region to another, and to what extent the level of spontaneous calcium intake may affect the magnitude of the response has, however, not yet been clearly established. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 149 healthy prepubertal girls aged 7.9+/-0.1 yr (mean+/-SEM) were either allocated two food products containing 850 mg of calcium (Ca-suppl.) or not (placebo) on a daily basis for 1 yr. Areal bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and bone size were determined at six sites by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The difference in BMD gain between calcium-supplemented (Ca-suppl.) and placebo was greater at radial (metaphysis and diaphysis) and femoral (neck, trochanter, and diaphyses) sites (7-12 mg/cm2 per yr) than in the lumbar spine (2 mg/cm2 per yr). The difference in BMD gains between Ca-suppl. and placebo was greatest in girls with a spontaneous calcium intake below the median of 880 mg/d. The increase in mean BMD of the 6 sites in the low-calcium consumers was accompanied by increased gains in mean BMC, bone size, and statural height. These results suggest a possible positive effect of calcium supplementation on skeletal growth at that age. In conclusion, calcium-enriched foods significantly increased bone mass accrual in prepubertal girls, with a preferential effect in the appendicular skeleton, and greater benefit at lower spontaneous calcium intake.     

运动联合碳酸钙维生素D对绝经早期女性骨标志物的影响

目的探讨运动联合碳酸钙维生素D在预防绝经早期女性骨质疏松的疗效观察。方法选择100例绝经早期女性,分为试验组和对照组各50例,分别进行X线骨密度(BMD)检测和3种骨标志物检测,作为基线。试验组给予碳酸钙维生素D3片口服,连续3、6、12、18个月后再次检测BMD和骨标志物,观察各指标的变化情况。结果绝经早期女性均存在较高的骨代谢转换率。运动联合碳酸钙维生素D治疗,可显著影响3种骨标志物的水平,3种骨标志物与BMD呈负相关,而且骨转换指标的改变优先于BMD。试验组3种骨标志物3个月内已发生变化,分别下降25%、12%、10%。在监测碳酸钙维生素D对骨标志物影响时,3种骨标志物各具有不同特点。Ⅰ型前胶原羧基端肽B特殊序列(β-CTX)在早期3个月内即可显著下降,6个月后基本变化不明显;Ⅰ型前胶原氨基端延长肽(P1NP)和N端骨钙素(N-MID)反应时间较长,在抗重吸收6个月后才有明显变化,1年后基本维持在一定水平,而BMD的改变则至少需要12个月以上。结论坚持运动和持续补充碳酸钙维生素D,能有效降低骨骼重吸收和改善维生素D水平,对绝经早期女性预防骨质疏松有重大意义。     

Potential effects of fluticasone propionate on bone mineral density in patients with asthma: a 2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of treatment with fluticasone propionate vs placebo on bone, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, and the eyes in patients with asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 160 patients with asthma who had minimal previous exposure to corticosteroids was conducted from July 1994 through June 1997. Patients received fluticasone at 88 microg twice daily, fluticasone at 440 microg twice daily, or placebo twice daily for 2 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated every 6 months by lumbar spine, proximal femur, and total body scans. Measurements of HPA axis function and ophthalmic evaluations were conducted at similar intervals. RESULTS: Among the 3 groups, no significant differences were observed in BMD at week 104 (at any anatomical site). Mean percent change from baseline in the lumbar spine was less than 1% for all 3 groups. At all time points, HPA axis function was similar in the 88-microg fluticasone group compared with the placebo group. For mean change from baseline in corticotropin-stimulated peak cortisol (P = .003 and P = .02 at weeks 24 and 52, respectively) and area under the stimulated plasma cortisol vs time curve (P = .002 and P = .02 at weeks 24 and 52, respectively), statistically significant reductions from baseline were observed in the 440-microg fluticasone group compared with the placebo group. These reductions of 10% to 13% from baseline were not accompanied by other signs of systemic effect and did not persist with continued treatment (at weeks 76 and 104). No important ocular changes were observed. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with 88 microg of fluticasone twice daily was comparable to placebo in all skeletal, ophthalmic, and HPA axis function assessments. Treatment with fluticasone at 440 microg twice daily resulted in no significant effects on BMD and a statistically significant but not clinically important temporary reduction in cortisol production.     

Efficacy and tolerability of alendronate once weekly in Asian postmenopausal osteoporotic women

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis has become a major health problem worldwide, and the incidence is rising in Asian countries. The aminobisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption and are currently the mainstay of treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Dosing frequency will likely affect tolerability and adherence to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerability and efficacy of a once-weekly aminobisphosphonate preparation in improving bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in osteoporotic Asian women. METHODS: Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to receive either alendronate 70 mg once weekly plus calcium carbonate 500 mg daily (n = 29) or calcium carbonate 500 mg daily (n = 29) for one year. BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Markers of bone formation and bone resorption included plasma total alkaline phosphatase and urine N-telopeptides. RESULTS: Treatment with alendronate 70 mg once weekly for one year resulted in significant BMD improvement of 6.1% at the spine, 5.6% at the femoral neck, and 3.5% at the total hip. There was no significant change in the BMD values in the calcium group (spine 1.4%, femoral neck -0.2%, total hip 0%). The BMD response in the alendronate group was significantly different from that in the calcium group at all time points, and the difference was detectable as early as after 3 months of treatment (ANOVA p < 0.001). The changes remained significant after adjusting for age, age at menarche, and years since menopause (p < 0.001). Similarly, the reductions in bone markers at 12 months were significantly different between the 2 treatment groups (plasma total alkaline phosphatase: alendronate 27.9%, calcium 5.4%; urine N-telopeptide: alendronate 55.6%, calcium 11.2%; both p < 0.001). The alendronate regimen was well tolerated, without significant adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed that once-weekly alendronate was efficacious in increasing BMD and reducing bone turnover and was well tolerated in Asian women.     

The effects of chenodiol on biliary lipids and their association with gallstone dissolution in the National Cooperative Gallstone Study (NCGS).

The National Cooperative Gallstone Study was a double-masked trial conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of chenodeoxycholic acid (chenodiol) for dissolution of cholesterol gallstones. Patients with radiolucent gallstones were randomly allocated to either a high dose (750 mg/d, n = 305) or low dose (375 mg/d, n = 306) of chenodiol or placebo (n = 305) administered for 2 yr. Specimens of gallbladder bile were obtained for biliary lipid analysis on 50% of all white obtained for biliary lipid analysis on 50% of all white patients at base line and after 3-mo therapy, on 45% at 12 mo, and on 36% at 24 mo. Among these specimens, 20% were inadequate for analysis. For analysis of data, available values during therapy were averaged up to time of dissolution, study exit, or study termination. In the high-dose group, percent chenodiol (molar percent of all bile acids) increased markedly and remained high during the 2 yr of follow-up. Also, molar percent cholesterol decreased significantly and remained low during the 2 yr of follow-up. In the low-dose group, percent chenodiol increased and remained significantly increased. Percent cholesterol saturation decreased at 3 mo, but at 24 mo it was not different from that in the placebo group, suggesting a physiological adaptation to the low dose by 2 yr. 79% of patients on high dose had greater than 70% chenodiol. Among these, half showed unsaturated bile (less than 100% cholesterol saturation) while the remainder were supersaturated; in the former group with unsaturated bile, 23% had complete dissolution and 51% had partial (greater than 50% reduction in stone size) or complete dissolution. In contrast, those with over 70% chenodiol and supersaturated bile had only 5% complete dissolution. Thus, development of unsaturated bile was a major factor associated with gallstone dissolution. The data also indicate that values for percent cholesterol saturation were a better predictor of gallstone dissolution than molar percent chenodiol, although a high percent chenodiol usually was required to obtain unsaturation.     

“Twice-a-month” clodronate 200 mg IM: a new dosing regimen and improved therapy adherence in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Introduction: The identification of therapeutic strategies aimed both at preventing and treating osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures has become increasingly important; in particular, it is essential to promote adequate patient adherence to treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on lumbar and femoral bone mass density (BMD) after two different intramuscular (IM) dosing regimens of clodronate (CLD), a bisphosphonate shown to be efficacious in reducing the incidence of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Secondary aims were the assessments of bone resorption markers, safety, tolerability, pain, and patient compliance. Methods: Sixty women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to two groups: group A (CLD 100 mg IM weekly for 12 months), and group B (CLD 200 mg IM every 2 weeks for 12 months). All patients received 1 g of calcium supplemented with 800 IU vitamin D₃, orally, once daily for 12 months Lumbar and femoral BMD, measured by DEXA Norland XR-36 (Norland Co., Fort Atkinson, WI), and bone turnover markers were assessed at baseline and at 12 months. Each patient was administered a visual analog scale of pain at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Results: A significant increase of BMD in both groups and in both skeletal sites was observed at 12 months versus baseline. In group A (n=28), lumbar BMD increased by 3.5% and femoral BMD by 2.1%; in group B (n=32), lumbar and femoral BMD rose by 3.4% and 2.2%, respectively. No difference was observed between groups. Bone resorption markers significantly reduced from baseline. Pain significantly improved as early as after 6 months of therapy and even more after 12 months, although no significant difference between the two groups was observed. The most common side effect was pain at the injection site, particularly in group B. Six patients in group A discontinued treatment and failed adherence to the therapeutic protocol. Conversely, no patient from group B discontinued therapy. Conclusion: In agreement with published data, in our two groups of patients, therapy with IM CLD at the doses of 100 mg/week and 200 mg/2 weeks was shown to be effective in increasing BMD, without differences between the two dosing regimens in all assessed efficacy parameters. Therefore, the “twice-a-month” regimen with 200 mg IM CLD may well promote an improved adherence with the same clinical efficacy and safety profile.     

Effect of miglustat on bone disease in adults with type 1 Gaucher disease: a pooled analysis of three multinational, open-label studies

BACKGROUND: Bone manifestations are a source of disability among patients with Gaucher disease (GD) and a focus of disease management. The effect of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) on GD bone disease can be limited and may take up to 8 years to become manifest. Miglustat, a glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor, may have a positive influence on GD bone disease. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the effects of miglustat on bone manifestations and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with type 1 GD. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of data collected prospectively over an observation period of 2 years from patients who participated in 3 multinational, open-label clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of miglustat 100 mg TID (the currently approved therapeutic dose). Bone manifestations were assessed qualitatively and in relation to treatment and spleen status. The effects of miglustat on BMD were assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and/or femoral neck. Bone response was defined as a positive change in BMD, based on the change in BMD Z-score from baseline to months 6, 12, and 24. Changes in BMD were also analyzed according to spleen status and baseline severity of osteopenia. RESULTS: The analysis involved 72 patients, including 41 (57%) who had received previous ERT and 20 (28%) who had undergone splenectomy. Patients' mean (SD) age was 41.2 (13.1) years. The most frequent bone-related manifestations at study entry were osteoporosis (43/63 [68%] patients) and bone pain (41/65 [63%] patients). At 2 years, 54/65 (83%) patients reported no bone pain. The reductions in bone pain were comparable among all subgroups, including high-risk patients (ie, splenectomized). No new cases of bone crisis, avascular necrosis, or pathologic fractures were reported. BMD Z-scores were improved from baseline at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck at each time point (months 6, 12, and 24) (P < 0.001). As early as 6 months after the initiation of miglustat monotherapy, significant increases from baseline in the BMD Z-score were observed at both the lumbar spine (mean, 0.15; P = 0.022) and femoral neck (0.23; P < 0.001); the increases remained significant at 12 months (0.19 [P = 0.012] and 0.21 [P = 0.017], respectively) and 24 months (0.21 [P = 0.015] and 0.18 [P = 0.039]). Significant increases in BMD Z-scores were observed at the femoral neck in splenectomized patients (P < 0.001) and at both sites in osteoporotic patients (lumbar spine: P < 0.001; femoral neck: P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis of 3 open-label studies of miglustat 100 mg TID suggests that miglustat monotherapy may reduce the incidence of bone pain and improve BMD in patients with type 1 GD, including those with a history of splenectomy and/or osteoporosis.