Use of emergency departments by elderly patients: projections from a multicenter data base.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of emergency medical care by the elderly in the United States, including emergency department visits, level of ED care required, ambulance services, and hospital admission rate. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter computerized data base of 70 hospitals in 25 states. DESIGN: A retrospective review of elderly patients seeking ED care and comparison of elderly and nonelderly patients. The data were then used to estimate the use of emergency medical services nationally. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen percent of the 1,193,743 ED visits were made by patients 65 years or older. Thirty-two percent of elderly patients seen in EDs were admitted to the hospital, compared with 7.5% of nonelderly patients. Seven percent of elderly patients were admitted to ICUs, compared with 1% of nonelderly patients. Thirty percent of elderly patients seeking emergency care used ambulance transports compared with 8% of nonelderly. It is estimated that 13,693,400 elderly patients were seen in EDs in 1990, with more than 4 million patients admitted to hospitals. Compared with the nonelderly, the elderly are 4.4 times more likely to use ambulance transport, 5.6 times more likely to be admitted to the hospital, 5.5 times more likely to be admitted to an intensive care bed, and 6.1 times more likely to be classified as a comprehensive ED level of service. In our sample, 36% of all patients arriving by ambulance to the ED, 43% of all ED admissions, and 48% of all intensive care admissions were geriatric patients. CONCLUSION: With the rapid growth of the size of the elderly population, it is important that we assess the emergency medical resources needed to care for the geriatric population.     

Care of the elderly in the emergency department

We prospectively examined the care provided to 234 elderly patients (age greater than or equal to 65) and an equal number of nonelderly patients visiting the emergency department of an urban teaching hospital. Sociodemographic, treatment, cost, and outcome data were collected through ED record reviews and follow-up telephone interviews. The elderly comprised 19% of the ED population and were often nonwhite (31%), Medicaid recipients (39%), living alone (41%), and multiply and chronically impaired. Among old-old patients (age greater than or equal to 75), the most frequent reasons for visiting the ED (19%) were a self-care problem, a fall, or dehydration. Forty-five percent of old-old patients' visits were for true medical emergencies or urgencies. Compared to the nonelderly, the old-old more often were admitted (47% versus 18%, P = .0001), stayed a longer time in the ED (three hours versus 1.9 hours, P = .0001), and incurred a higher charge ($324 versus $208, P = .0001) Twenty-nine percent of these old-old patients who were not initially admitted returned within 14 days (recidivated). The recidivism rate for nonelderly patients was only half as high (15%) (P = .02).     

Care of the elderly in emergency departments: conclusions and recommendations.

Little attention is being paid to the special needs of elderly persons in emergency departments. Emergency health care professionals feel less comfortable caring for elderly than for nonelderly patients. The social and personal concerns of the elderly frequently are not addressed in ED encounters. There is a paucity of research and education in geriatric emergency medicine. Overall principles of care for elderly patients seeking emergency care have not been defined as they have for other special populations such as children. The disease-oriented model used for caring for nonelderly adult patients in EDs may not be appropriate for elderly patients. The emergency care of the elderly requires significantly more health care resources than does that of the nonelderly. Compared with nonelderly patients, elderly patients seeking emergency care are four times more likely to use ambulance services, five times more likely to be admitted to the hospital, five times more likely to be admitted to an intensive care bed, and six times more likely to receive comprehensive emergency services. Although 12% of the population is 65 years or older, this group accounted for 36% of all ambulance patient transports to EDs, 43% of all hospital ED admissions, and 48% of all critical care admissions from EDs. These problems are particularly important at this time because many hospitals and their EDs are faced with significant problems of overcrowding and inadequate resources to meet the health care needs of the communities they serve. Although the elderly are the fastest-growing segment of the population, little or no planning is ongoing to meet the emergency health care needs of the elderly in the future. The task force has provided specific recommendations for addressing these problems.     

Geriatric patient emergency visits. Part II: Perceptions of visits by geriatric and younger patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare group perceptions of reasons for emergency department care, ED use patterns, and the effect of illness on self-care ability for elderly and younger adult patients. DESIGN: Patient survey. SETTING: Six geographically distinct US hospital EDs. PARTICIPANTS: From each site, a stratified sample (approximately 7:3) of elderly (65 years and older) and nonelderly (21 to 64 years old) control ED patients treated during the same time period was contacted. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-nine elderly patients and 172 adult controls were interviewed using a structured survey instrument. Groups were compared using chi 2 analysis and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Both the elderly and the control patients (49% versus 38%) commonly stated that the most important reason for coming to the ED was because they were "too sick to wait for an office visit." Of patients with a regular physician, both groups often were referred to the ED by their primary care provider (35% versus 26%). While the elderly had more visits to their primary care provider (3.3 versus 2.9 visits; P less than .00001), there was no difference in the number of ED visits (1.5 versus 1.6 visits) during the preceding six months. Of those released from the ED, more elderly noted deterioration in their ability to care for themselves as a result of their illness (21% versus 11%; P less than .03). CONCLUSION: The elderly use the ED for reasons similar to those for younger adults. Often they feel too ill to wait for an office visit or are referred in by their primary care provider. Elderly patients more commonly have difficulty with self care after release home, and emergency physicians must plan accordingly.     

The use and effectiveness of an emergency department observation unit for elderly patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Emergency department observation units are cost-effective alternatives to hospital admission for selected patients. However, the use and effectiveness of these units in the elderly population is unclear. We sought to describe the use of an ED observation unit by elderly patients (>or=65 years), to determine whether the ED observation unit is effective for them in terms of ED observation unit length of stay and hospital admission rates, and to compare efficacy and return visit rates between younger and older patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients sent to an ED observation unit from 1996 to 2000 at a high-volume tertiary care suburban teaching hospital. ED observation unit length of stay of less than 18 hours and admittance rates of less than 30% were used as indicators of efficacy. Diagnosis, length of stay, hospital admission rates, and 30-day return visit rates were compared between younger and older patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two thousand five hundred and thirty adult patients were observed, with 37.2% older than 65 years of age. The most common diagnoses in elderly patients were chest pain (24.0%), dehydration (11.7%), syncope (6.5%), back pain (4.6%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.8%). Length of stay in the ED observation unit was longer for the elderly than younger patients but still averaged less than 18 hours (15.8 hours [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.7 to 16.0] versus 14.4 hours [95% CI 14.3 to 14.5], respectively). Elderly patients were more likely to be admitted from the ED observation unit than younger patients (26.1% versus 18.5%); however, their overall admission rate remained less than 30%. Compared with younger patients, the odds ratios for inpatient admission of elderly patients was highest for back pain (2.10; 95% CI 1.62 to 2.73), pyelonephritis (1.78; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.71), and chest pain (1.65; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.89). Thirty-day related return visit rates between age groups were similar (9.4% versus 7.6%). CONCLUSION: Elderly ED observation unit patients had ED observation unit lengths of stay and hospital admission rates that were effective for an ED observation unit setting and ED return visits rates that were comparable with those of younger patients.     

Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age (from the 1985 to 1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry)

The 1985 to 1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Registry series of 1,801 initial procedures included 486 patients age greater than or equal to 65 years (elderly). In comparison to younger patients, a greater proportion of elderly patients were women and had unstable angina. Elderly patients had more history of hypertension and more history of congestive heart failure. Although the elderly had more extensive vessel disease, the numbers of lesions and vessels attempted with PTCA were similar in the older and younger cohorts. Angiographic success rates were similar for all age groups. Although complication rates in the catheterization laboratory did not differ, patients greater than or equal to 65 years were much more likely to require emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) (5.4 vs 2.8%, p less than 0.05) or elective CABG (3.9 vs 1.6%, p less than 0.01). The in-hospital death rate was considerably higher among the elderly (3.1 vs 0.2%, p less than 0.01). At 2-year follow-up, symptomatic status and cumulative rates of myocardial infarction, CABG and repeat PTCA were similar for elderly and younger patients. The death rate after 2 years was higher among elderly patients (8.8% of patients greater than or equal to 65 years vs 2.9% of patients less than 65 years, p less than 0.01). When the relative risk of death for the elderly was adjusted for factors more prevalent among those greater than or equal to 65 years (history of congestive heart failure, multivessel disease, unstable angina, history of hypertension and female gender), the relative risk remained significant but was substantially reduced (from 3.3 to 2.4).     

Analysis of emergency department utilization by elderly patients under National Health Insurance

Elderly persons are thought to use emergency departments (EDs) disproportionately. This phenomenon has implications for policy-making as the population of the elderly continues to increase. This study aimed to characterize national ED utilization by elderly patients (> or = 65 years old), compared with that by younger patients (15-64 years old). The sample was selected from the National Health Insurance Research Database for the year 2000. There were 519,003 visits to adult EDs in the 12 medical centers sampled. The study used a secondary data analysis and included 14 variables. The elderly accounted for 28.5% of all adult ED visits. Compared with younger patients, a greater proportion of elderly patients were male (61.6% vs. 47.7%, p < 0.001), had chronic diseases (11.9% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001), were major cases (6.7% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001), made no co-payment (38.5% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001), were frequent users of outpatient services (28.4% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001), were higher-level emergencies (60.0% vs. 43.7%, p < 0.001), had longer stays in the ED (14.0% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001), and had higher costs per visit (NT dollars 4,814 +/- 6,046 vs. 2,779 +/- 5,533, p < 0.001). In addition, elderly patients used 40.8% of total adult ED costs. Older patients have distinct patterns of ED use, and use emergency services at a higher rate than younger patients. ED staff should be knowledgeable about the unique and complex presentations of older ED patients.     

Comparison of clinical presentation of acute myocardial infarction in patients older than 65 years of age to younger patients: the Multicenter Chest Pain Study experience

To assess whether the manifestations of acute ischemic heart disease in the elderly are less typical than in younger patients, the presenting clinical features and their associated relative risks for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were compared in 2,625 patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age and 5,109 patients less than 65 years of age. These patients were evaluated for acute chest pain in the emergency departments of 7 hospitals. The same features were associated with increased relative risks for AMI in younger and elderly patients. The relative risks among older patients, however, were consistently closer to 1.0 for classic features, including male gender, pressure-like quality of pain, substernal location, typical pattern of pain radiation and electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia or AMI. Analyses for the endpoint "acute ischemic heart disease" (i.e., AMI or unstable angina) yielded similar findings. Elderly patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital (56 vs 35%; p less than 0.0001) and to the coronary care unit (37 vs 23%; p less than 0.0001) in the absence of either AMI or unstable angina. These data support the hypothesis that diagnosis of acute chest pain is especially difficult in elderly patients.     

Old people in the emergency room: age-related differences in emergency department use and care

Little is known about how the care received in emergency departments (ED) by the elderly population differs from that received by younger people. We prospectively abstracted ED records of 1620 consecutive patients visiting a large community hospital ED over a 22-day period in 1984 for demographic and medical variables. Charts of patients presenting with five specific complaints (dyspnea, chest pain, abdominal pain, syncope, and motor vehicle accidents) were also analyzed for process of care variables and, for patients hospitalized, the accuracy of the ED diagnosis. Older people (ie, those greater than or equal to 65 years of age) do not seem to be overutilizers of the ED for minor complaints, in fact, they tend to be more acutely ill on presentation than younger people. Older people were more likely to be hospitalized (46% v 10%, P less than .001), to arrive by ambulance (35% v 10%, P less than .001), and to have an identified source of primary care (95% v 64%, P less than .01). Older people stayed longer in the ED than younger people if they were eventually released home but shorter if admitted to the hospital. Test ordering patterns for specific complaints varied by patient age (eg, older patients had more electrocardiograms performed for chest pain and fewer urinalyses for abdominal pain than younger patients). Therapy for specific complaints showed less age effect. Although generally more diagnostic tests were performed on older patients, the ED diagnosis tended to be more accurate for younger patients. Our data indicate that the process of ED care may be substantially different for the elderly population and have implications for future planning and financing of medical care.     

Age-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era

INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available on contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice patterns and outcomes in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate "real-world" PCI in elderly and nonelderly patients during the first year of availability of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the United States market (May 1, 2003-April 30, 2004). METHODS: One thousand one hundred sixty-six consecutive patients (272 elderly [age > or =75 years] and 894 nonelderly [age <75 years]) having PCI for de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center were included in this study. Primary outcome measures of this study were in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE-death, new MI, urgent revascularization). Secondary end points included acute renal failure, respiratory failure, and vascular complications. RESULTS: Elderly patients had higher MACE (8.5% vs 1.5%, P < or = 0.001), unadjusted in-hospital mortality (7.4% vs 0.8%, P < or = 0.001), in-hospital cardiac arrest (1.5% vs 0.3%, P = 0.03), requirements for assisted blood pressure support (13.2% vs 7.0%, P = 0.0001), respiratory failure (2.2% vs 0.9%, P = 0.08), acute renal failure (2.9% vs 0.8%, P = 0.005), and vascular complications (10.3% vs 5.5%, P = 0.005) than their nonelderly counterparts. Higher MACE rates persisted in the elderly despite correction for baseline differences using multivariate regression modeling. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age remains a predictor of adverse outcomes attending PCI even in the contemporary era in which DES are available. This study highlights the need for further progress and investigation to optimize outcomes of PCI in the elderly.     

Risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia in the elderly.

PURPOSE: Elderly patients have a disproportionate incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (NP) and a higher mortality rate, yet few studies have focused on this high-risk population. We undertook a study to examine risk factors for NP in elderly inpatients and to describe how these patients differ from younger patients with NP. METHODS: In a public teaching hospital, all cases of NP in patients aged 65+ were ascertained by prospective surveillance during a 2-year period (n = 59). These elderly cases were compared with 59 cases of NP in patients aged 25 to 50 to describe differences in risk factors and outcomes. Elderly cases were then matched to elderly control subjects who were admitted to the same hospital service but did not develop NP. Data were collected on known risk factors and on the potential risk factors of poor nutrition, neuromuscular disease, and dementia. Significant differences in risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate comparisons of cases and controls. RESULTS: Elderly patients had twice the incidence of NP (RR = 2.1) as younger patients. Onset of infection was earlier for young than for older cases (6 versus 11 days, p less than or equal to 0.02), but mortality following NP was equal for the two age groups (42% versus 44%). No significant differences in risk factors were found for old and young cases, although older cases tended to have higher rates of poor nutrition, neuromuscular disease, and aspiration preceding their pneumonias. Comparison of elderly cases and elderly controls revealed significantly increased frequencies of poor nutrition, neuromuscular disease, pharyngeal colonization, aspiration, depressed level of alertness, intubation, intensive care unit admission, nasogastric tube use, and antacid use among cases. Cases were more severely ill on admission and had more pre-existing risk factors (2.8 versus 1.3, p less than or equal to 0.001) and more in-hospital risk factors (4.7 versus 1.6, p less than or equal to 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed low albumin, diagnosis of neuromuscular disease, and tracheal intubation to be strong independent predictors of risk for NP among elderly inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the specific risk factors of poor nutrition, neuromuscular disease, and tracheal intubation may prove useful to target future clinical interventions to prevent NP in the elderly.     

Healthcare utilization of elderly persons hospitalized after a noninjurious fall in a Swiss academic medical center

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of hospital readmission, nursing home admission, and death, as well as health services utilization over a 6-month follow-up, in community-dwelling elderly persons hospitalized after a noninjurious fall. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with 6-month follow-up. SETTING: Swiss academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred ninety persons aged 75 and older hospitalized through the emergency department. MEASUREMENTS: Data on demographics and medical, physical, social, and mental status were collected upon admission. Follow-up data were collected from the state centralized billing system (hospital and nursing home admission) and proxies (death). RESULTS: Seventy patients (10%) were hospitalized after a noninjurious fall. Fallers had shorter hospital stays (median 4 vs 8 days, P<.001) and were more frequently discharged to rehabilitation or respite care than nonfallers. During follow-up, fallers were more likely to be institutionalized (adjusted hazard ratio=1.82, 95% confidence interval=1.03-3.19, P=.04) independent of comorbidity and functional and mental status. Overall institutional costs (averaged per day of follow-up) were similar for both groups ($138.5 vs $148.7, P=.66), but fallers had lower hospital costs and significantly higher rehabilitation and long-term care costs ($55.5 vs $24.1, P<.001), even after adjustment for comorbidity, living situation, and functional and cognitive status. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients hospitalized after a noninjurious fall were twice as likely to be institutionalized as those admitted for other medical conditions and had higher intermediate and long-term care services utilization during follow-up, independent of functional and health status. These results provide direction for interventions needed to delay or prevent institutionalization and reduce subsequent costs.     

Sex differences among adults presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma. Multicenter Asthma Research Collaboration Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is an increasing problem worldwide, particularly among women. Sex differences in acute asthma presentation, management, or outcome would have important medical and economic implications. OBJECTIVE: To compare emergency department (ED) visits for acute asthma among women vs men. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study as part of the Multicenter Asthma Research Collaboration. Patients in the ED, aged 18 to 54 years, who presented with acute asthma underwent a structured interview in the ED and another by telephone 2 weeks later. The study was performed at 36 EDs in 18 states. Pregnant women with asthma were excluded (n=53). RESULTS: Of 1228 patients, 64.3% were women. Women did not differ significantly from men by age or education level, but women were more likely to be insured, have a primary care provider, and use inhaled corticosteroids. Women had a higher mean+/-SD peak expiratory flow rate than men, both early (expressed as percent predicted) (53%+/-21% vs 41%+/-18%; P<.001) and late (77%+/-24% vs 65%+/-21%; P<.001) in the ED stay. Despite this, women were more likely to be admitted to a hospital (multivariate odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval; 1.3-4.0) than men. At 2-week follow-up, women had not experienced more relapse events (odds ratio, 1.1) but were 1.5 times more likely to report an ongoing exacerbation (95% confidence interval; 1.0-2.4). CONCLUSIONS: Of adults who presented to the ED with acute asthma, women were almost twice as common as men. Although men received less outpatient care and had worse pulmonary function, women were more likely to be admitted to the hospital and to report an ongoing exacerbation at follow-up. Further studies are needed to better understand the complex relationship between sex and acute asthma.     

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasms in the Elderly

The number of elderly people with superficial gastric neoplasms is increasing, but the clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating elderly people with superficial gastric neoplasms remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and precancerous lesions in elderly (≥75 years of age) and nonelderly (<75 years of age) patients.From October 2005 to December 2014, 83 consecutive patients with EGC and precancerous lesions (86 lesions) who were treated using ESD in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. There were 44 lesions in 42 elderly patients who were at least 75-years old. The following parameters were compared between the 2 groups: preexisting comorbidities, performance status (PS), lesion inclusion criteria, lesion characteristics, treatment outcomes, surgery time, duration of hospitalization, complications, and intraoperative hemodynamic changes.Elderly patients had significantly higher preexisting comorbidity rates (90.9% vs 59.5%, P = 0.001), expanded lesion criteria rates (43.2% vs 19.0%, P = 0.016), and lower best PS rates (38.6% vs 81.0%, P < 0.001) than nonelderly patients. Lesion characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The elderly had higher intraoperative hypotension rates (47.7% vs 21.4%, P = 0.011) and oxygen desaturation rates (9.1% vs 0.0%, P = 0.045) than nonelderly patients. In addition, the elderly also had a longer surgery time (107.0 ± 51.4 vs 91.5 ± 66.2 minutes, P = 0.049) and duration of hospitalization (7.5 ± 3.8 vs 5.9 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.016) than nonelderly patients. There were no differences in the prevalence rates of en-bloc resection, complete resection, bleeding, perforation, pneumonia, or intraabdominal free air between the 2 groups.Although elderly patients who underwent ESD for superficial gastric neoplasms had an increasing risk of intraoperative hypotension and oxygen desaturation, all patients were treated appropriately without postoperative sequelae. ESD is a safe and feasible intervention for elderly patients who have more comorbidity, a worse PS and more expanded lesions.     

Impact of age on the outcomes of women following percutaneous coronary intervention in the bare-metal stent era

AIM: Advanced age and female gender are both independent predictors of early and late mortality and adverse cardiac outcomes for patients undergoing balloon angioplasty. Elderly women are at particular risk. Stenting is now the standard of care in PCI. Whether elderly women remain at increased risk after PCI in the current stent era has not been examined widely. METHODS: Prospective data were collected in 400 consecutive female patients undergoing PCI at a tertiary cardiac center (1999-2003). Follow-up was done at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months by clinic visits, telephonic interviews, and reviewing hospital records. Follow-up was complete in 396 patients. RESULTS: Compared to young women (<65 years old), elderly women (>65 years old) were less likely to smoke (15.7% vs 47.2%, P = 0.001), less likely to have diabetes (4.1% vs 8.5%, P = 0.05), and had more multivessel coronary artery disease. Usage of stent was high, similar in both groups. Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, previous MI, vessels treated, abciximab usage, and access site bleeding were similar in both groups. Procedural success (96% vs 98%) and in-hospital and 1-year MACE (23.1% vs 25%) are similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Elderly women undergoing PCI have a distinct profile presenting with more multivessel disease, less smoking, and are less likely to have diabetes than younger women. In the current stent era, procedural success, in-hospital adverse cardiac events, and MACE at 1 year are similar in both groups. At 1 year, however, elderly women are less likely to have ischemia-driven TVR and recurrence of angina.     

Analysis of emergency department visits by elderly patients in an urban public hospital in Turkey

Background/PurposeElderly patients have higher rates of emergency department visits worldwide. Emergency department utilization by older elderly is much more than younger elderly due to their disease complexity, comorbidities, and severity. This study aimed to determine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of elderly patients admitted to the emergency department of a hospital and to compare attendance data regarding older age groups.MethodsAll older people admitted to the emergency department in 2011 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients aged 65–74 years were defined as younger elderly and those aged ≥75 years as older elderly. The prevalence of emergency admission, demographic information, reason for visit, time of admission, diagnosis of disease, and disposition of the two age groups were compared. The Chi-square test was used to analyze data.ResultsThe mean age of the elderly patients was 74.7 ± 6.8 years; 56.7% of them were female. Elderly patients accounted for 11.9% of all emergency department visits. The mean number of emergency department visits per year was 1.15 for older elderly patients and 0.75 for younger elderly patients (p < 0.001). The season in which emergency visits are most frequent was winter, and the most frequent presentation times were evening and night shifts (18:00–23:59 hours). The most common emergency department diagnosis among older and younger elderly patients was related to circulatory disease (26.3% and 21.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). Nearly 90% of the elderly were discharged from the emergency department. Older elderly patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital than younger elderly patients (14.3% vs. 4.7%).ConclusionThe annual rates of admission to the emergency departments and hospitals were significantly higher in the older elderly population than in the younger elderly population. The most common diagnoses among elderly patients were disorders of the circulatory system.     

Prevalence of high-risk cardiovascular conditions and the status of hypertension management among hypertensive adults 65 years and older in the United States: analysis of a primary care electronic medical records database

This study compared the prevalence of high-risk cardiovascular (CV) conditions, antihypertensive medication treatment patterns, and demographic and clinical characteristics associated with blood pressure (BP) goal attainment between elderly (65 years and older) and nonelderly (younger than 65 years) adults with hypertension. Retrospective cohort study was conducted using an electronic medical record database among patients receiving at least 1 antihypertensive medication. CV risk profiles were assessed by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnosis codes. Treatment patterns were assessed by the number of antihypertensive medications prescribed. BP goal attainment was determined by the mean of the last 2 BP readings during 1 year of follow-up. Logistic regression estimated the odds of achieving BP goal. There were 61,355 nonelderly (mean age, 51.8 years) and 47,796 elderly (mean age, 73.2 years) patients in the study. Elderly patients had statistically significant higher levels of isolated systolic hypertension and complicated hypertension. Elderly patients had statistically significant higher levels of prescribing patterns characterized by multiple antihypertensive medications but statistically significant lower levels of BP goal attainment. Age 65 years and older, African American race, body mass index ≥30, and the presence of complicated hypertension were found to be statistically significant factors contributing to a lower likelihood of BP goal attainment. Despite aggressive antihypertensive treatment, elderly patients are less likely to achieve BP goals.     

Beneficial effect of preinfarction angina on in-hospital outcome is preserved in elderly patients undergoing coronary intervention for anterior acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Preinfarction angina improves survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in nonelderly but not elderly patients in the thrombolytic era. However, it remains unclear whether preinfarction angina has a beneficial effect on clinical outcome in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group comprised 484 anterior AMI patients who were admitted within 24 h of onset and underwent emergency PCI. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those aged < 70 years (nonelderly patients, n = 290) and those aged > or = 70 years (elderly patients, n = 194). Angina within 24 h before AMI was present in 42% of nonelderly patients and in 37% of elderly patients. In nonelderly patients, preinfarction angina was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality rate (1% vs 7%, p = 0.02). Similarly, in elderly patients, preinfarction angina was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality rate (6% vs 16%, p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that the absence of preinfarction angina was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in both nonelderly (odds ratio 4.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-10.6; p = 0.04) and elderly patients (odds ratio 3.04; 95%CI 1.06-18.1; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Angina within the 24 h before AMI is associated with better in-hospital outcomes in elderly and nonelderly patients.     

Subintensive care unit for the elderly: a new model of care for critically ill frail elderly medical patients

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of elderly patients are admitted to the hospital for critical diseases and the gap between supply and demand of intensive care resources is a growing problem. To meet this challenge, 4 beds in a 24-bed acute care for the elderly (ACE) medical unit were dedicated to a subintensive care unit (SICU). Severely ill elderly medical patients, requiring a higher level of care than provided in ordinary wards, are admitted. The aim of the study was to describe the characteristics of the setting and to discuss its usefulness based on data obtained after the first period of implementation. METHODS: This article describes the development, management, economics and patient characteristics of the SICU. Patient care combines the ACE model with a highly specialised medical care. Patients admitted to the SICU are compared with patients treated in the ordinary ACE unit before the SICU opened. All patients received a multidimensional evaluation, including demographics, main diagnosis, number of chronic somatic diseases, Charlson index, APACHE II score, APACHE-APS subscore, number of currently administered drugs, serum albumin, cognitive status (Mini-Mental State Examination), depression (Geriatric Depression Scale) and functional status (basic and instrumental activities of daily living). Ward physicians performed assessment and collection of data. RESULTS: During the first 16 months, 489 patients were admitted, 401 according to the selection criteria (60 +/- years and APACHE II score > or =5 and/or APACHE-APS score > or =3). Mean age was 78.1 years, mean APACHE II score 14.5 (moderate severity) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation was received by 87 (21.7%). The most common diagnoses were respiratory failure, cardiac disease and stroke. Mean length of stay in the SICU was 61.8 h, and 6.0 days in the hospital. Compared with ACE-unit patients admitted during 2002 (n=1380), SICU patients were obviously more seriously ill (APACHE II score 14.5 vs 6.7). When comparing patients of same illness severity (APACHE-APS score > or =3) (n=125), patients treated in the SICU had lower in-hospital mortality than those treated in the ordinary ACE ward (12.5 vs 19.2%). Only a few patients (3.5%) were transferred to the intensive care unit as a consequence of increased severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: The SICU is an innovative method to treat frail elderly patients with more severe conditions. Low hospital mortality compared with that of severe patients in the ACE unit supports the usefulness of this model. It could be implemented in medical units of large hospitals in order to give optimal care and advanced interventions to the frail elderly and to avoid intensive care unit overcrowding.