Microcomputed Tomographic Analysis of the Alveolar Ridge Alteration around Extraction Sites with and without Immediate Implants Placement: In Vivo Study

Background: The aim was to assess the alveolar ridge alteration around extraction sites with and without immediate implants according to extraction socket classification (ESC) using microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT). Material and Methods: Ten beagle dogs (mean age and weight: 24 ± 0.83 months and 13.8 ± 0.49 kg, respectively) were randomly divided into three groups according to the ESC. In Group 1 (ESC‐I), bilateral first and third premolars were extracted and replaced with immediate implants. In Group 2 (ESC‐II), two adjacent premolars were extracted with one immediate implant placement in the mesial socket in the maxilla and in the distal socket in the mandible. In Group 3 (ESC‐III), three adjacent teeth were extracted and an immediate implant was placed in the central socket. Primary closure was achieved using resorbable sutures. Buccal sites with dehiscence defects were excluded. After 4 months, subjects were sacrificed and alveolar ridge widths were measured at 1 mm interval in axial and sagittal views, using micro‐CT in sites with and without immediate implants. Results: In sites without immediate implant placement, alveolar ridge width was significantly higher in Group 1(6.1 ± 1.35 mm) than Group 3 (4.14 ± 1.53 mm) (p < .05). In sites with immediate implant placement, the alveolar ridge width was higher among sites in Group 1 (6.4 ± 3.8 mm) than Group 2 (4.8 ± 0.46 mm) (p < .05) and Group 3 (5.02 ± 0.84 mm) (p < .05). Overall, between each corresponding group in both sites with and without immediate implant placement at 1 mm thickness, there was no significant difference in the alveolar ridge widths. Conclusion: With the exception of Group 1 (ESC‐I), immediate implant placement did not prevent or minimize bone remodeling in extraction sites according to ESC.     

Effect of Single and Contiguous Teeth Extractions on Alveolar Bone Remodeling: A Study in Dogs

Background: Tooth extraction is associated with dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge. The aim was to examine the effect of single versus contiguous teeth extractions on the alveolar ridge remodeling. Material and Methods: Five female beagle dogs were randomly divided into three groups on the basis of location (anterior or posterior) and number of teeth extracted – exctraction socket classification: group 1 (one dog): single‐tooth extraction; group 2 (two dogs): extraction of two teeth; and group 3 (two dogs): extraction of three teeth in four anterior sites and four posterior sites in both jaws. The dogs were sacrificed after 4 months. Sagittal sectioning of each extraction site was performed and evaluated using microcomputed tomography. Results: Buccolingual or palatal bone loss was observed 4 months after extraction in all three groups. The mean of the alveolar ridge width loss in group 1 (single‐tooth extraction) was significantly less than those in groups 2 and 3 (p < .001) (multiple teeth extraction). Three‐teeth extraction (group 3) had significantly more alveolar bone loss than two‐teeth extraction (group 2) (p < .001). The three‐teeth extraction group in the upper and lower showed more obvious resorption on the palatal/lingual side especially in the lower group posterior locations. Conclusion: Contiguous teeth extraction caused significantly more alveolar ridge bone loss as compared with when a single tooth is extracted.     

A 1‐Year Controlled Clinical Trial of Immediate Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets: Stability Measurements and Crestal Bone Level Changes

Purpose: The aim of this study was to measure stability and crestal bone level changes of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in elderly patients. Methods: Thirty‐five patients who were in need of tooth extractions were recruited for this study. They received a total of 65 implants in both jaws to support fixed or removable prostheses. The teeth were carefully extracted, the implants set directly in the root socket, and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were simultaneously performed (Time 1 = T1). After a healing time of 6 to 10 weeks the measurements were repeated (Time 2 = T2). Orthograd periapical radiographs were taken when the new prostheses were fabricated and after 1 year of loaded period. The distance between the first visible bone implant contact (BIC) and the implant‐shoulder was measured and crestal bone loss was calculated (ΔBIC). Mean RFA and BIC were compared for various subgroups (p < .05). By means of a fixed effects model, the impact of the parameters gender, jaw, and prosthetic indication on RFA measurements was analyzed (p < .016). Results: The mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 64.4 ± 6.7 at T1 and 64.0 ± at 8.6 T2, with a trend to higher values for male patients. The mixed model showed that only the jaw had a statistically significant impact on ISQ values, with higher values for the mandible. Mean crestal bone loss was small with 0.49 ± 0.81 mm, ranging form 0.1 to 2.4 mm. Twenty percent of the implant sites lost more than 1‐mm crestal bone. No differences were found in subgroups. Conclusions: Good primary and secondary stability of the implants was reached in both jaws. Crestal bone loss was small but may not be fully predictable for a single site. This treatment modality can be applied successfully in elderly patients and can be suggested for various prosthetic indications in both jaws.     

Bone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs

Aim: To compare the influence of autologous or deproteinized bovine bone mineral as grafting material on healing of buccal dehiscence defects at implants installed immediately into the maxillary second incisor extraction socket in dogs. Material and methods: In the maxillary second incisor sockets of 12 Labrador dogs, implants were installed immediately following tooth extraction. A standardized buccal defect was created and autologous bone particles or deproteinized bovine bone mineral were used to fill the defects. A collagen membrane was placed to cover the graft material, and the flaps were sutured to fully submerge the experimental areas. Six animals were sacrificed after 2 months, and six after 4 months of healing. Ground sections were obtained for histological evaluation. Results: After 2 months of healing, all implants were osseointegrated. All buccal dehiscence defects were completely filled after 2 months irrespective of the augmentation material (autologous bone or Bio‐Oss^®) applied. Bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) on the denuded implant surfaces was within a normal range of 30–40%. However, the newly formed tissue at 2 months was partially resorbed (>50% of the area measurements) after 4 months. Conclusions: Applying either autologous bone or deproteinized bovine bone mineral to dehiscences at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets resulted in high degree of regeneration of the defects with satisfactory BIC on the denuded implant surface. To cite this article:
De Santis E, Botticelli D, Pantani F, Pereira FP, Beolchini M, Lang NP. Bone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 430–437.     

Efficacy of Using PDGF and Xenograft With or Without Collagen Membrane for Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Implants With Induced Dehiscence‐Type Defects: A Microcomputed Tomographic Study in Dogs

Background: Use of collagen membrane (CM) with xenograft and recombinant human platelet‐derived growth factor (rhPDGF) in guided bone regeneration (GBR) is debatable. The aim of this microcomputed tomographic experiment was to assess the efficacy of using PDGF and xenograft (with or without CM) for GBR around immediate implants with dehiscence defects. Methods: Ten beagle dogs underwent atraumatic bilateral second and fourth premolar extractions from both arches. A standardized dehiscence defect (6 × 3 mm) was created on the buccal bone and immediate implants were placed in distal sockets in each site. Animals were randomly divided into three groups: 1) group 1, xenograft with rhPDGF was placed and covered with CM; 2) group 2, xenograft with rhPDGF was placed over the defects; and 3) group 3, four immediate implants were associated with dehiscence (controls). After 16 weeks, animals were sacrificed and jaw segments were assessed for buccal bone thickness (BBT), buccal bone volume (BBV), vertical bone height (VBH), and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) using microcomputed tomography. Results: BBT was higher in group 2 (1.533 ± 0.89 mm) than group 1 (0.745 ± 0.322 mm) (P <0.001) and group 3 (0.257 ± 0.232 mm) (P <0.05). BBV was higher in group 2 (67.87 ± 19.83 mm³) than group 1 (42.47 ± 6.78 mm³) (P <0.05) and group 3 (19.12 ± 4.06 mm³) (P <0.001). VBH was higher in group 2 (6.36 ± 1.37 mm) than group 3 (0.00 ± 0.00 mm) (P <0.001). VBH was higher in group 1 (3.91 ± 2.68 mm) than group 3 (0.00 ± 0.00 mm) (P <0.05). BIC was higher in group 2 (67.25% ± 13.42%) than group 1 (36.25% ± 12.78%) (P <0.05) and group 3 (30.25% ± 7.27%) (P <0.01). Conclusion: GBR around immediate implants with dehiscence defects using PDGF and xenograft alone resulted in higher BBT, BBV, VBH, and BIC than when performed in combination with CM.     

Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog

Background: Studies in humans and animals have shown that following tooth removal (loss), the alveolar ridge becomes markedly reduced. Attempts made to counteract such ridge diminution by installing implants in the fresh extraction sockets were not successful, while socket grafting with anorganic bovine bone mineral prevented ridge contraction. Aim: To examine whether grafting of the alveolar socket with the use of chips of autologous bone may allow ridge preservation following tooth extraction. Methods: In five beagle dogs, the distal roots of the third and fourth mandibular premolars were removed. The sockets in the right or the left jaw quadrant were grafted with either anorganic bovine bone or with chips of autologous bone harvested from the buccal bone plate. After 3 months of healing, biopsies of the experimental sites were sampled, prepared for buccal–lingual ground sections and examined with respect to size and composition. Results: It was observed that the majority of the autologous bone chips during healing had been resorbed and that the graft apparently did not interfere with socket healing or processes that resulted in ridge resorption. Conclusion: Autologous bone chips placed in the fresh extraction socket will (i) neither stimulate nor retard new bone formation and (ii) not prevent ridge resorption that occurs during healing following tooth extraction. To cite this article:
Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 9–13.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01937.x     

Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog

OBJECTIVE: To study dimensional alterations of the alveolar ridge that occurred following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five beagle dogs were included in the study. In both quadrants of the mandible, incisions were made in the crevice region of the third and fourth pre-molars. Buccal and minute lingual full-thickness flaps were elevated. The mesial root of the four pre-molars root was filled and the teeth were hemi-sected. Following flap elevation in (3)P(3) and (4)P(4) regions, the distal roots were removed. In the right jaw quadrants, implants with a sand blasted and acid etched (SLA) surface were placed in the fresh extraction sockets, while in the left jaws the corresponding sockets were left for spontaneous healing. The mesial roots were retained as surgical control teeth. After 3 months, the animals were examined clinically, sacrificed and tissue blocks containing the implant sites, the adjacent tooth sites (mesial root) and the edentulous socket sites were dissected, prepared for ground sectioning and examined in the microscope. RESULTS: At implant sites, the level of bone-to-implant contact (BC) was located 2.6+/-0.4 mm (buccal aspect) and 0.2+/-0.5 mm (lingual aspect) apical of the SLA level. At the edentulous sites, the mean vertical distance (V) between the marginal termination of the buccal and lingual bone walls was 2.2+/-0.9 mm. At the surgically treated tooth sites, the mean amount of attachment loss was 0.5+/-0.5 mm (buccal) and 0.2+/-0.3 mm (lingual). CONCLUSIONS: Marked dimensional alterations had occurred in the edentulous ridge after 3 months of healing following the extraction of the distal root of mandibular pre-molars. The placement of an implant in the fresh extraction site obviously failed to prevent the re-modelling that occurred in the walls of the socket. The resulting height of the buccal and lingual walls at 3 months was similar at implants and edentulous sites and vertical bone loss was more pronounced at the buccal than at the lingual aspect of the ridge. It is suggested that the resorption of the socket walls that occurs following tooth removal must be considered in conjunction with implant placement in fresh extraction sockets.     

Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone remodeling and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) after immediate placement at different levels in relation to the crestal bone of Beagle dogs. Materials and methods: The mandibular bilateral second, third and fourth premolars of six Beagle dogs were extracted and six implants were immediately placed in the hemi‐arches of each dog. Randomly, three cylindrical and three tapered implants were inserted crestally (control group) and 2 mm subcrestally (experimental group). Both groups were treated with a minimal mucoperiosteal flap elevation approach. A gap from the buccal cortical wall to the implant was always left. Three dogs were allowed a 4‐week submerged healing period and the other three an 8‐week submerged healing period. The animals were sacrificed and biopsies were obtained. Biopsies were processed for ground sectioning. Histomorphometric analysis was carried out in order to compare buccal and lingual bone height loss, and BIC between the two groups. Results: All implants osseointegrated clinically and histologically. Healing patterns examined microscopically at 4 and 8 weeks for both groups (crestal and subcrestal) yielded similar qualitative bone findings. The distance from the top of the implant collar to the first BIC in the lingual crest (A–Lc) showed a significant difference (P=0.0313): 1.91 ± 0.2 mm in the control group and 1.08 ± 0.2 mm in the experimental group. There was less bone resorption in subcrestal implants than crestal implants. The mean percentage of newly formed BIC was greater with the cylindrical implant design (46.06 ± 4.09%) than with the tapered design (32.64 ± 3.72%). Conclusion: These findings suggest that apical positioning of the top of the implant does not jeopardize bone crest and peri‐implant tissue remodeling. However, less resorption of the Lc may be expected when implants are placed 2 mm subcrestally. To cite this article:
Negri B, Calvo‐Guirado JL, Pardo‐Zamora G, Ramírez‐Fernández MP, Delgado‐Ruíz RA, Muñoz‐Guzón F. Peri‐implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 228–235.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02158.x     

Clinical and histomorphometric evaluation of extraction sockets treated with an autologous bone marrow graft

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of an autologous bone marrow graft in preserving the alveolar ridges following tooth extraction. Materials: Thirteen patients requiring extractions of 30 upper anterior teeth were enrolled in this study. They were randomized into two groups: seven patients with 15 teeth to be extracted in the test group and six patients with 15 teeth to be extracted in the control group. Hematologists collected 5 ml of bone marrow from the iliac crest of the patients in the test group immediately before the extractions. Following tooth extraction and elevation of a buccal full‐thickness flap, titanium screws were positioned throughout the buccal to the lingual plate and were used as reference points for measurement purposes. The sockets were grafted with an autologous bone marrow in the test sites and nothing was grafted in the control sites. After 6 months, the sites were re‐opened and bone loss measurements for thickness and height were taken. Additionally, before implant placement, bone cores were harvested and prepared for histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Results: The test group showed better results (P<0.05) in preserving alveolar ridges for thickness, with 1.14±0.87 mm (median 1) of bone loss, compared with the control group, which had 2.46±0.4 mm (median 2.5) of bone loss. The height of bone loss on the buccal plate was also greater in the control group than in the test group (P<0.05), 1.17±0.26 mm (median 1) and 0.62+0.51 (median 0.5), respectively. In five locations in the control group, expansion or bone grafting complementary procedures were required to install implants while these procedures were not required for any of the locations in the test group. The histomorphometric analysis showed similar amounts of mineralized bone in both the control and the test groups, 42.87±11.33% (median 43.75%) and 45.47±7.21% (median 45%), respectively. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the autologous bone marrow graft can contribute to alveolar bone repair after tooth extraction. To cite this article:
Pelegrine AA, da Costa CES, Correa MEP, Marques JFC Jr. Clinical and histomorphometric evaluation of extraction sockets treated with an autologous bone marrow graft.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 535–542.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01891.x     

Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry

Aim: To assess dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites.
Material and methods: Twelve subjects received 12 immediate transmucosal implants in molar extraction sites. Peri-implant defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration by means of a deproteinized bone substitute and a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Changes in vertical (IS-BD, CREST-BD) and horizontal distances (EC-I, IC-I) of alveolar bony walls to the bottom of the defects (BD) and to the implant surfaces (I) were compared between implant placement and surgical re-entry at 6 months.
Results: The implant survival rate at 6 months was 100%. Statistically significant differences ( P <0.01) were observed in the mean changes in vertical distances IS-BD and CREST-BD between baseline and re-entry. At re-entry, all peri-implant marginal defects assessed from the internal socket wall to the implant surface (IC-I) were healed. The residual combined thickness of the buccal wall with the newly formed peri-implant bone at sites with an initial thickness of 1 mm was statistically significantly smaller ( P <0.05) compared with that of sites with an initial buccal thickness of 2 mm (2.50 ± 0.76 vs. 4±0 mm).
Conclusions: The marginal defects around immediate implants placed in molar extraction sites were completely filled after 6 months of healing through de novo bone formation. Bone resorption was observed from the external aspects of the buccal and oral socket walls. Dimensional changes of the external socket walls were mostly pronounced at the buccal aspects.     

Bio-Oss collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog

Background: Following tooth extraction and immediate implant installation, the edentulous site of the alveolar process undergoes substantial bone modeling and the ridge dimensions are reduced. Objective: The objective of the present experiment was to determine whether the process of bone modeling following tooth extraction and immediate implant placement was influenced by the placement of a xenogenic graft in the void that occurred between the implant and the walls of the fresh extraction socket. Material and methods: Five beagle dogs about 1 year old were used. The 4th premolar in both quadrants of the mandible (₄P₄) were selected and used as experimental sites. The premolars were hemi‐sected and the distal roots removed and, subsequently, implants were inserted in the distal sockets. In one side of the jaw, the marginal buccal‐approximal void that consistently occurred between the implant and the socket walls was grafted with Bio‐Oss^® Collagen while no grafting was performed in the contra‐lateral sites. After 6 months of healing, biopsies from each experimental site were obtained and prepared for histological analyses. Results: The outline of the marginal hard tissue of the control sites was markedly different from that of the grafted sites. Thus, while the buccal bone crest in the grafted sites was comparatively thick and located at or close to the SLA border, the corresponding crest at the control sites was thinner and located a varying distance below SLA border. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that the placement of Bio‐Oss^® Collagen in the void between the implant and the buccal‐approximal bone walls of fresh extraction sockets modified the process of hard tissue healing, provided additional amounts of hard tissue at the entrance of the previous socket and improved the level of marginal bone‐to‐implant contact. To cite this article:
Araújo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio‐Oss^® Collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6‐month study in the dog.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01920.x     

Bucco-lingual bone remodeling around implants placed into immediate extraction sockets: a case series

BACKGROUND: Implants placed immediately after tooth extraction have shown high percentages of clinical success. Few studies in the scientific literature have observed the horizontal bone remodeling in the buccal-lingual direction after immediate placement of implants. The aim of this study was to analyze bone healing and coronal bone remodeling around 15 implants placed immediately after tooth removal without the use of guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques. METHODS: Ten patients received a total of 15 implants placed immediately after removal of 15 single-rooted teeth. All implants were placed within the alveolar confines, limiting, in most cases, small peri-implant bone defects. After implant placement, the distance from the buccal to lingual bone plate was measured. No membranes or filling materials were used. Primary flap closure was performed in all cases. RESULTS: At second-stage surgery, all peri-implant defects were completely filled and the distance from buccal to lingual bone was measured again. The pattern of bone healing around the neck of immediate implants showed an absence of peri-implant defects and a narrowing of bone crest width in a buccal-lingual direction. The mean distance between buccal bone and lingual bone at the time of implant placement was 10.5 mm (+/- 1.52) and, at second-stage surgery, 6.8 mm (+/- 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: The coronal bone remodeling around immediate implants showed a healing pattern with new bone apposition around the neck of the implants and, at the same time, bone resorption with horizontal width reduction of the bone ridge. The small peri-implant bone defects were completely healed without the use of GBR procedures. An absence of complications during the healing period was also observed, probably due to the absence of barrier membranes and grafting materials.     

Effect of immediate or delayed loading following immediate placement of implants with a modified surface

Objective: To evaluate the effect of the timing of loading on bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) following immediate placement of implants with a hydrophilic sandblasted, large‐grit and acid‐etched surface (modSLA) into fresh extraction sockets in a minipig model. Material and methods: Six minipigs were used in this study. In each hemi‐mandible, two conical shape implants (TE, Straumann implants) with a hydrophilic surface (modSLA) were placed in fresh extraction sockets. In one side of the mandible (control), two implants were immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets. The implants were loaded after 4 weeks of healing. At the contralateral side (test), two implants were immediately placed and loaded. After 8 weeks of healing, the animals were sacrificed and histologically analysed. Results: During the experimental period, no implants were lost and all of them presented to be osseointegrated. The percentage of BIC was similar in both groups: 66.1% and 65.1% for the control and test group, respectively. Furthermore, the distance from the shoulder of the implant to bone crest and the distance from the shoulder to the first BIC were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Immediate implant placement and loading showed similar BIC with immediate placement and delayed loading when implants with a modSLA surface were used. Both procedures showed similar buccal bone crest levels, which presented some resorption irrespective of the treatment modality. To cite this article:
Liñares A, Mardas N, Dard M, Donos N. Effect of immediate or delayed loading following immediate placement of implants with a modified surface.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 38–46.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01988.x     

Bone remodelling after regenerative procedures around implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in Beagle dogs

Introduction: After a tooth extraction, the height of the buccal wall tends to decrease. The literature indicates that regenerative techniques (guided bone regenerative [GBR] techniques) have succeeded in improving the bone levels. Therefore, this experiment set out to compare the physiological bone remodelling in Beagle dog models after implant placement in a fresh extraction socket, with and without the application of regenerative procedure. Materials and methods: Five dogs were used in this study. Test and control sites were randomly selected. The experimental teeth (fourth pre‐molar and first molar) were hemi‐sected removing the distal roots and placing implants. Porcine bone was placed to fill the gap around the implant on the test sites and a reabsorbable membrane was used to cover the area. The dogs were put down at different times (2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months). The measurements were taken immediately and at 2, 4, 12 weeks after implant placement. Student's test for paired data was used to compare the means of the clinical measurements. Results: At 2 weeks: On the control sites, few signs of resorption were detected at the first molar only, while at the test sites bone levels were placed at the implant shoulder or above. At 4 weeks: On the control site, slight bone remodelling was observed, while on the test site minor signs of resorption or an increase of bone levels were detected. At 12 weeks: The alveolar crest on the control sites showed various degrees of remodelling. On the test sites stable bone levels or an increase of bone crest was observed. Conclusion: With the limits of this study, the findings showed that GBR techniques were able to limit resorption of the alveolar crest after tooth extraction. A pattern of bone remodelling after tooth extraction and implant placement was observed in the control sites (no GBR) as well as in test sites (GBR), and although the exact cause of this is unclear, surgical trauma could play a role. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results and to clarify the precise causes of bone remodelling in fresh extraction sockets. To cite this article:
Barone A, Ricci M, Calvo‐Guirado JL, Covani U. Bone remodelling after regenerative procedures around implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the Beagle dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1131–1137
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02084.x     

Does preservation of the socket decrease marginal bone loss in the mandible after extraction of first molars?

The quality of the bone plays an important part in marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants. The aim of this study was to compare MBL around implants the sockets of which had been preserved with the bone around healed sites in the mandible after extraction of first molars. It was a prospective, cohort study in which subjects were divided into three groups (n = 30 in each): dental implants were placed six months after preservation of the socket in the first group, eight weeks after tooth extraction in the second, and six months after tooth extraction in the third. The changes between the marginal bone level after loading of the implant and 12, 24, and 36 months later were considered to be the MBL. Age and sex were the variables studied, the condition of the bone (healed socket or preservation) was a predictive factor, and MBL was the outcome. Analysis of variance was used to compare MBL and age among groups. There were no differences in the mean MBL among the three groups 12, 24, and 36 months after loading (p = 0.55, p = 0.22, p = 0.38, respectively). Preservation of the socket did not seem to affect MBL of the first molar of the mandible.     

The effect of non-resorbable membrane on buccal bone healing at an immediate implant site: an experimental study in dogs

Objective: For successful implant treatment in the esthetic area, stable hard tissue and soft tissue are very important. At the buccal side without buccal bone defects, prophylactic guided bone regeneration (GBR) with bone substitute was frequently used for achieving thick buccal bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of GBR using a non‐resorbable membrane in an immediate implant site without bone defects. Material and methods: Immediate implants were placed into the mandibles of four mongrel dogs. In the experimental group (TM group), a non‐resorbable membrane was placed and fixed onto the buccal bone plate around the implant. In the control group, the implants were placed without membrane coverage. After 12 weeks, the dogs were sacrificed and histological specimens were prepared. The vertical distances from the smooth–rough surface interface (SRI) to the gingiva, the first‐bone contact, and the bone crest were measured on the buccal and lingual sides. The horizontal thicknesses of the gingiva and bone at 0, 1, 2, and 3 mm below the SRI were measured. Results: In the TM group, first‐bone contact on the buccal side was more coronally positioned approximately 0.8 mm than the control group (P=0.041). The buccal bone thickness of the TM group was well preserved and there was no difference between the buccal and lingual sides. Comparing the control group, implants of the TM group had 1 mm thicker buccal bone (P=0.0051 at bone 1 mm level, P=0.002 at bone 2 mm level). In the control group, buccal bone loss was observed and buccal bone was about 1 mm thinner than the lingual bone (P<0.05). Conclusions: GBR with a non‐resorbable membrane and no bone graft substitute could help to preserve buccal bone thickness on the immediate implant site without defects. To cite this article:
Park S‐Y, Kye S‐B, Yang S‐M, Shin S‐Y. The effect of non‐resorbable membrane on buccal bone healing at an immediate implant site: an experimental study in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 289–294.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01995.x     

Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement

Background: Animal and human researches have shown that immediate implant placement into extraction sockets failed to prevent socket dimensional changes following tooth extraction. It has been suggested that a minimal width of 1–2 mm of buccal bone is necessary to maintain a stable vertical dimension of the alveolar crest. Aim: To determine the dimensions of the bony wall at extraction sites in the esthetic zone (anterior teeth and premolars in the maxilla) and relate it to immediate implant placement. Methods: As part of an ongoing prospective randomized‐controlled multicenter clinical study on immediate implant placement, the width of the buccal and palatal bony walls was recorded at 93 extraction sites. Results: The mean width of the buccal and palatal bony walls was 1 and 1.2 mm, respectively (P<0.05). For the anterior sites (canine to canine), the mean width of the buccal bony wall was 0.8 mm. For the posterior (premolar) sites, it was 1.1 mm (P<0.05). In the anterior sites, 87% of the buccal bony walls had a width ≤1 mm and 3% of the walls were 2 mm wide. In the posterior sites, the corresponding values were 59% and 9%, respectively. Conclusions: If the criterion of a minimal buccal bone width of 2 mm to maintain a stable buccal bony wall is valid, only a limited number of sites in the anterior maxilla display such a clinical situation. The data suggested that in the majority of extraction sites in the anterior maxilla, thin (≤1 mm) buccal walls were present. This, in turn, means that in most clinical situations encountered, augmentation procedures are needed to achieve adequate bony contours around the implant. To cite this article:
Huynh‐Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Lindhe J, Lang NP. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 37–42.     

Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement

BACKGROUND: Implants placed immediately after tooth extraction offer several advantages, but many authors have reported problems in filling the residual gap between the implant and the socket walls. Barrier and grafting techniques have been tested and yield varying results, so it has been suggested that the timing of implant placement may be important for success. The aim of this study was to analyze bone healing and coronal bone remodeling around 35 implants, 20 placed immediately after tooth removal and 15 placed 6 to 8 weeks after extraction. METHODS: All the implants were submerged and placed within the alveoli confines, leaving circumferential defects because the implants did not contact the bone at their coronal aspects; stabilization was achieved in the bone apically. After implant placement the mean distance from buccal bone to lingual bone was 10 mm (SD 1.522) for immediate implants and 8.86 mm (SD 2.356) for delayed implants. No membrane or filling materials were used. Primary flap closure was accomplished in all cases. RESULTS: At second-stage surgery all peri-implant defects were filled, and the mean distance from buccal bone to lingual bone was 8.1 mm (SD 1.334) for immediate implants and 5.8 mm (SD 1.265) for delayed implants. This pattern of coronal bone remodeling, showing a narrowing of the bucco-lingual width, was clinically similar for the two groups, although it should be noted that the delayed implants exhibited smaller bucco-lingual bone width already at the first measurement: it can be speculated that early remodeling may start immediately after tooth extraction and continue, non-uniformly, even after delayed implant placement. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that circumferential defects could heal clinically without any guided bone regeneration (GBR) in both experimental groups, and that the procedure was virtually free from complications in the postoperative period, probably because of the absence of barrier membranes and/or grafting materials. Histologically, peri-implant defects of over 1.5 mm heal by connective tissue apposition, rather than by direct bone-to-implant contact, but clinically this healing may be very successful. No histological analysis was carried out in the present study, but even the largest residual gaps were filled with hard tissue that could not be probed. Thus, such outcomes can be considered clinically successful. The different rate of bone remodeling around immediate or delayed implants could have implications for the preferred timing of implant placement in sites of high esthetic concern.     

Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs

Aim: To evaluate the influence of magnesium‐enriched hydroxyapatite (MHA) (SintLife^®) on bone contour preservation and osseointegration at implants placed immediately into extraction sockets. Material and methods: In the mandibular pre‐molar region, implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets of six Labrador dogs. MHA was placed at test sites, while the control sites did not receive augmentation materials. Implants were intended to heal in a submerged mode. After 4 months of healing, the animals were sacrificed, and ground sections were obtained for histomorphometric evaluation. Results: After 4 months of healing, one control implant was not integrated leaving n=5 test and control implants for evaluation. Both at the test and the control sites, bone resorption occurred. While the most coronal bone‐to‐implant contact was similar between test and control sites, the alveolar bony crest outline was maintained to a higher degree at the buccal aspect of the test sites (loss: 0.7 mm) compared with the control sites (loss: 1.2 mm), even though this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The use of MHA to fill the defect around implants placed into the alveolus immediately after tooth extraction did not contribute significantly to the maintenance of the contours of the buccal alveolar bone crest. To cite this article:
Caneva M, Botticelli D, Stellini E, Souza SLS, Salata LA, Lang NP. Magnesium‐enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 512–517
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02040.x     

Peri-implant health around screw-shaped c.p. titanium machined implants in partially edentulous patients with or without ongoing periodontitis

Abstract: The relationship between periodontitis and peri‐implantitis remains a matter of debate. The present study compared, “within” randomly chosen partially edentulous patients (n=84 subjects, 97 jaws), the marginal bone loss around teeth and implants during 5 years (range 3 to 11 years) following the first year of bone remodelling. The patients had all been rehabilitated by means of screw‐shape c.p. titanium implants with a machined surface (Brånemark system^®). During the 5 years observation interval, periodontal parameters (marginal bone and attachment loss, the latter for teeth only) were collected together with data on confounding factors (smoking, oral hygiene, tooth loss). Marginal bone loss was measured through long‐cone intra‐oral radiographs. The mean “interval” bone loss was significantly (P=0.0001) higher around teeth (0.48±0.95 mm) than around implants (0.09±0.28 mm). The corresponding data for the “worst” performing tooth (0.99±1.25 mm) and implant (0.19±0.32 mm) per subject showed the same tendency. Neither attachment nor bone loss around teeth correlated with marginal bone loss around implants. This study indicated that the rate of bone loss around screw‐shape c.p. titanium implants with a machined surface (Brånemark system^® implants) was not influenced by the progression rate of periodontal destruction around the remaining teeth within the same jaw.