Sentinel node investigation in breast cancer: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry

AIMS: To evaluate in detail the extent to which step sectioning and immunohistochemical examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in patients with breast cancer reveal additional node positive patients, to arrive at a sensitive yet workable protocol for histopathological SN examination. METHODS: This study comprised 86 women with one or more positive SN after a successful SN procedure for clinical stage T1-T2 invasive breast cancer. SNs were lamellated into pieces of approximately 0.5 cm in size. One initial haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained central cross section was made for each block. When negative, four step ribbons were cut at intervals of 250 microm. One section from each ribbon was stained with H&E, and one was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: When taking the cumulative total of detected metastases at level 5 as 100%, the percentage of SN positive patients increased from 80%, 83%, 85%, 87% to 88% in the H&E sections through levels 1 to 5, and with IHC these values were 86%, 90%, 94%, 98%, and 100%. Three of nine patients in whom metastases were detected at levels 3-5 only had metastases in the subsequent axillary lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple level sectioning of SNs (five levels at 250 microm intervals) and the use of IHC detects additional metastases up to the last level. Although more levels of sectioning might increase the yield even further, this protocol ensures a reasonable workload for the pathologist with an acceptable sensitivity when compared with the published literature.     

Multiparameter flow cytometry as a tool for the detection of micrometastatic tumour cells in the sentinel lymph node procedure of patients with breast cancer

AIM: To investigate whether multiparameter flow cytometry (MP-FCM) can be used for the detection of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer. METHODS: Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded sentinel lymph nodes (n = 238) from 98 patients were analysed. For each lymph node, sections for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin (MNF116) were cut at three levels with a distance of 500 microm. The intervening material was used for MP-FCM. Cells were immunostained with MNF116, followed by an incubation with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labelled goat antimouse immunoglobulin. DNA was stained using propidium iodide. From each lymph node 100,000 cells were analysed on the flow cytometer. RESULTS: Thirty eight of the 98 patients with breast carcinoma showed evidence of metastatic disease in the SLN by one ore more of the three methods. In 37 of 38 cases where metastatic cells were seen in the routine H&E and/or IHC, more than 1% cytokeratin positive cells were detected by MP-FCM. In 24 patients, metastatic foci were more than 2 mm (macrometastasis) and in 14 these foci were smaller than 2 mm (micrometastasis). In three of these 14 cases, MP-FCM revealed positive SLNs, although this was not seen at first glance in the H&E or IHC sections. After revision of the slides, one of these three remained negative. However, MP-FCM analysis of the cytokeratin positive cells showed an aneuploid DNA peak, which was almost identical to that of the primary breast tumour. Duplicate measurements, done in 41 cases, showed a 99% reproducibility. In five of 14 patients with micrometastasis, one or two metastatic foci were found in the non-SLN. However, in 15 of 24 macrometastases multiple non-SLNs were found to have metastatic tumour. All micrometastases except for the remaining negative one mentioned above showed only diploid tumour cells, despite the fact that their primary tumours contained both diploid and aneuploid tumour cells. In primary tumours with more than 60% aneuploid cells, predominantly aneuploid macrometastasis were found, whereas diploid primary tumours only showed diploid micrometastases or macrometastases in their SLN. Aneuploid SLN macrometastases were associated with non-SLN metastases in five of seven patients, whereas diploid cases showed additional non-SLN metastases in only seven of 16 patients. CONCLUSION: In all cases, MP-FCM was sufficient to detect micrometastatic tumour cells in a large volume of lymph node tissue from SLNs. In some cases it was superior to H&E and IHC staining. Approximately 30% of SLN micrometastases are accompanied by additional non-SLN metastases. The size of the aneuploid fraction (> 60%) in the primary tumour may influence the risk of having both SLN and non-SLN metastases.     

Histopathological work-up and interpretation of sentinel lymph nodes removed for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Aims:  To evaluate the work-up of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) removed for vulvar pT1–pT2 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Inguinal lymphadenectomy yields metastases in only 30% of cases. Patients with missed inguinal disease, however, have a risk of dying from systemic disease. SLN dissections reduce morbidity, but work-up should reliably identify metastatic disease.
Methods and results:  All SLNs removed from 38 patients with pT1–pT2 SCC and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes were submitted for frozen section analysis. When negative, SLN were formalin-fixed, sectioned entirely at 330-μm intervals to produce three slides per millimetre [two haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides; one slide for immunohistochemistry]. If screening of H&E-stained sections was negative, all remaining slides were subjected to immunohistochemistry with an antibody to cytokeratin. Twenty-five of 38 patients (66%) were pN0, 7/38 (18%) had metastases on frozen sections/H&E stains. Immunohistochemistry detected micrometastases in two patients and single tumour cells and anucleate cell structures in four patients. In 12/13 patients the SLN metastases, including all single-cell deposits, were from lichen sclerosus (LS)-associated SCC. Twelve of 13 patients with metastases had a pT2 SCC.
Conclusions:  Micrometastases and single tumour cell deposits in SLNs are typical of LS-associated vulvar SCC. Single tumour cell deposits in SNLs should be regarded as 'positive'. Identification requires serial sectioning and immunohistochemical analysis of all removed SLNs.     

Evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy by immunohistochemistry and multilevel sectioning in patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection for evaluation of the presence or absence of metastatic disease is the single most important prognostic factor for patients with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer. Recently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is being investigated as an alternative to the evaluation of the entire axilla. We evaluated whether the application of multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemistry in SLNs will increase the accuracy of detection of metastatic deposits. METHODS: Between October 1998 and July 1999, 38 patients with breast carcinoma (25 ductal, 5 lobular, 4 tubular, and 4 mixed ductal and lobular) underwent successful SLN biopsy followed by complete axillary node dissection. Sentinel lymph nodes were localized with a combination of isosulfan blue dye and radionuclide colloid injection. Frozen sections and permanent sections of SLNs were examined. All negative SLNs were examined for micrometastases by 3 additional hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections and immunohistochemistry with the cytokeratins AE1/AE3. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified surgically in 38 (93%) of 41 patients. There was a 97% correlation between the results of the frozen sections and the permanent H&E-stained sections. Twelve (32%) of 38 patients showed evidence of metastatic disease in their SLN by routine H&E staining. In 7 (58%) of 12 patients with positive nodes, the sentinel node was the only positive node. The 26 patients with negative SLN examination by H&E were further analyzed for micrometastases; 5 (19%) were found to have metastatic deposits by immunohistochemistry. Of these patients, 2 were also converted to node positive by detection of micrometastatic disease by examination of the additional H&E levels. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph nodes can be accurately identified in the axilla of breast cancer patients. Evaluation of SLNs provides reliable information representative of the status of the axilla in these patients. Immunohistochemistry and, to a lesser degree, detailed multilevel sectioning are able to further improve our ability to detect micrometastatic disease in SLNs of breast cancer patients.     

Can Melan-A replace S-100 and HMB-45 in the evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes from patients with malignant melanoma?

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become an increasingly important procedure used in the primary staging of malignant melanoma. However, micrometastases in a lymph node can be easily missed on routine H&E-stained sections. Therefore, S-100 and HMB-45 IHC stains are standardly performed on grossly negative SLNs for detection of metastatic melanoma. Each of these IHC markers, however, is not ideal. The authors investigated whether the newer IHC marker Melan-A would improve the detection of metastatic melanoma in SLN biopsies. Forty lymph nodes previously diagnosed with metastatic melanoma were retrospectively evaluated for S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A expression. In addition, 42 SLN biopsies for metastatic melanoma detection were prospectively collected and evaluated for S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A expression. All lymph nodes with metastatic melanoma from the retrospective study demonstrated S-100 reactivity. Five of the lymph nodes with metastatic melanoma from the retrospective study failed to express either HMB-45 or Melan-A, all of which displayed a desmoplastic morphology. One of the metastases positive for S-100 and HMB-45 failed to show reactivity with Melan-A (3%). The prospective study found 10 lymph nodes from 42 cases to be positive for metastatic melanoma, which were positive for S-100 (100%). Nine of the involved lymph nodes were positive for HMB-45(90%), and nine were positive for Melan-A (90%). Melan-A, although very specific, cannot replace the use of S-100 and HMB-45 for the detection of metastatic melanoma in SLNs. It can, however, substitute for HMB-45 with equally good results.     

Pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The identification of lymph node metastases in colorectal resection specimens is necessary for accurate tumor staging. However, routine lymph node dissection by the pathologist yields only a subset of nodes removed surgically and may not include those nodes most directly in the path of lymphatic drainage from the tumor. Intraoperative mapping of such sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been reported in cases of melanoma and breast cancer. We applied a similar method to cases of colorectal carcinoma, with emphasis on the pathology of the SLNs. METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma were evaluated after intraoperative injection of 1 to 2 mL of 1% isosulfan blue dye (Lymphazurin) into the peritumoral subserosa. Blue-stained lymph nodes were suture-tagged by the surgeon within minutes of the injection for identification by the pathologist, and a standard resection was performed. Designated SLNs were sectioned at 10 levels through the block; a cytokeratin immunostain (AE1) was also obtained. To evaluate the possibility that increased detection of metastases in the SLN might be solely due to increased histologic sampling, all initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 cases were sectioned also at 10 levels. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were identified intraoperatively in 82 (99%) of 83 patients and accounted for 152 (11.9%) of 1275 lymph nodes recovered, with an average of 1.9 SLNs per patient. A total of 99 positive lymph nodes (38 positive SLNs and 61 positive non-SLNs) were identified in 34 node-positive patients. The SLNs were the only site of metastasis in 17 patients (50%), while 14 patients (41%) had both positive SLNs and non-SLNs. Three patients (9%) had positive non-SLNs with negative SLNs, representing skip metastases. In patients with positive SLNs, 91 (19%) of 474 total lymph nodes and 53 (12%) of 436 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. In patients with negative SLNs, 8 (1%) of 801 total lymph nodes and 8 (1.2%) of 687 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. Multilevel sections of 330 initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 patients yielded only 2 additional positive nodes (0. 6%). All patients with positive SLNs were correctly staged by a combination of 4 representative levels through the SLN(s) together with a single cytokeratin immunostain. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative mapping of SLNs in colorectal carcinoma identifies lymph nodes likely to contain metastases. Focused pathologic evaluation of the 1 to 4 SLNs so identified can improve the accuracy of pathologic staging.     

Rapid intraoperative immunohistochemical evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic breast carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an integral part of the surgical management of patients with breast cancer. Rapid immunohistochemistry (RIHC) has the potential to increase detection of metastatic carcinoma at the time of frozen section consultation. The authors assessed the accuracy and turnaround time of a newly developed RIHC method for pancytokeratin (RIHC-CK). METHODS: Sixty-six SLNs from 32 patients with breast carcinoma were examined for metastasis using the Zymed Sentinel Lymph Node Rapid IHC Kit. Intraoperative frozen sections (6 mum) of the SLNs were incubated with Zymed anti-pan-cytokeratin/HRP conjugate, diaminobenzidine (DAB), and stained with hematoxylin. Slides were ready within 8 minutes and were interpreted as positive or negative for metastatic carcinoma. Results were compared with previous intraoperative touch preparations, frozen sections, hematoxylin and eosin (Perm H&E), and AEl/3-immunostained permanent sections (Perm CK). RESULTS: Fourteen lymph nodes (19%) in 13 patients tested positive for metastatic carcinoma in Perm H&E, the gold standard. RIHC-CK had the highest sensitivity (92%) of the intraoperative tests, compared with touch preparations (64%) and frozen sections (80%). RIHC-CK showed 94% accuracy, compared with 96% (frozen section) and 93% (touch preparation). The RIHC technique took 8 minutes and was easy to perform and interpret. CONCLUSIONS: Zymed RIHC is a sensitive method for detecting breast cancer metastases in SLNs. The speed, accuracy, and ease of interpretation of the test allow for recognition of micrometastases (<2 mm) that might otherwise be undetectable by current methods of intraoperative evaluation. The prognostic significance and effect on surgical management of micrometastases in SLNs have yet to be determined.     

False-positive cells in sentinel lymph nodes

Melanoma sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) are carefully evaluated to maximize sensitivity. Examination includes hematoxylin and eosin (H+E) stained sections at multiple levels through the node, with subsequent immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for melanocytic markers if H+E sections are negative for melanoma. However, not all IHC-positive cells in SLN are metastatic melanoma, as evidenced by the presence of MART-1 positive cells in SLN from breast cancer patients with no history of melanoma (so-called 'false-positive' cells). These 'false-positive cells' could be nodal nevus, non-melanocytic cells with cross-reacting antigenic determinants, phagocytic cells containing melanocyte antigens, or possibly melanocytes or melanocyte stem cells liberated at the time of biopsy of the cutaneous melanoma. Examination of SLN requires careful correlation of H+E and IHC findings.     

Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important component in the staging and treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM). The medical literature provides only limited information regarding melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) histology. This report details the specific histological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and highlights some key factors in evaluating SLNs for melanoma. METHODS: From 281 SLNB cases between June 1998 and May 2002, 79 consecutive cases of SLN biopsies positive for metastases from CM were retrospectively reviewed. The important characteristics of the SLNs and the metastatic foci are described. RESULTS: The median size of positive SLNs was 17 mm (range, 5-38). SLNs had a median of two metastatic foci (range, 1-11), with the largest foci being a median of 1.1 mm in size (range, 0.05-24). S-100 and HMB-45 staining was positive in 100% and 92% of the detected metastatic foci, respectively. The metastatic melanoma cells were epithelioid, spindled, and mixed in 86%, 5%, and 9% of cases. Metastatic foci were most often (86%) found in the subcapsular region of the SLN. Benign naevic cells were found coexisting in 14% of positive SLNs. CONCLUSIONS: Staining for S100 is more sensitive than HMB-45 (100% v 92%), but HMB-45 staining helped to distinguish benign naevic cells from melanoma. The subcapsular region was crucial in SLN evaluation, because it contained the metastases in 86% of cases. Evaluation of the subcapsular space should not be compromised by cautery artefacts or incomplete excision of the SLN.     

Metastatic melanoma volume in sentinel nodes: objective stereology-based measurement predicts disease recurrence and survival

Aims:  Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is the most important prognostic factor in intermediate thickness melanoma. The amount of metastatic disease in positive SLNs varies greatly between patients, and this tumour burden appears to influence the prognosis of node-positive patients. The aim was to use objective stereological techniques to correlate accurately total SLN tumour burden with recurrence and patient survival.
Methods and results:  SLNs from 327 patients were examined by complete step sectioning and immunohistochemistry. The total metastasis volume (TMV) of 156 positive SLNs from 99 patients (30.3%) was measured using stereological methods based on the 2D-nucleator and Cavalieri's principle. The maximum metastasis diameter was also measured. These two measurements were correlated with disease recurrence and patient survival. The mean TMV for SLN+ patients was 10.5 mm³ (median 0.05 mm³; range 0.0001–623.7 mm³). Median follow-up was 26.3 months. On multivariate analysis, TMV was an independent predictor of recurrence when corrected for primary tumour thickness ( P  = 0.001) and was a stronger prognosticator compared with the maximum metastasis diameter ( P  < 0.0001 versus P  = 0.01).
Conclusions:  Combining total step sectioning of SLNs with stereological assessment of metastases, we found metastasis volume to be a highly significant predictor of disease recurrence and survival.     

The development of optimal pathological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma

1158 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), excised from patients with primary cutaneous melanoma, were assessed pathologically using histology with immunohistochemistry (IHC) on all nodes, and RT-PCR for Mart-1 and tyrosinase on 55 nodes. RT-PCR was compared with the histology and IHC assessed on the same nodes. The evaluation of progressively more detailed protocols for histology and IHC modulated by the RT-PCR results led to a procedure that consistently detects metastases in 34% of patients submitted to SLN biopsy for cutaneous melanomas with a vertical growth phase and a mean thickness of 2.02 mm (range 0.25, with regression, to 19 mm). As this technique is virtually free of false positives and produces only a marginally lower detection rate than RT-PCR, which was subject to false positives of 7% in our study, it is suggested that this extended protocol should be the basis on which further evaluation of the place of RT-PCR in SLN assessment takes place. The evolved protocol described here has been adopted by the EORTC as the standard procedure for pathological handling of sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma when SLN status is a criterion in their clinical trials or studies.     

Micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes predict involvement of nonsentinel nodes in patients with melanoma

The aim of the present study was to determine whether micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from patients with melanoma are useful for predicting further nodal involvement in completion lymph node dissection (CLND) specimens. Of 986 patients with melanoma undergoing SLN biopsy between March 1992 and February 2001, 175 (17.7%) had at least 1 positive SLN and 140 had subsequent CLND specimens available for review. Further nodal involvement in CLND specimens was present in 24 (17.1%) of 140 patients. Of 8 micromorphometric features of the SLNs that were assessed, the presence of metastases in CLND specimens was correlated significantly with a tumor penetrative depth (maximum distance of melanoma cells from the inner margin of the SLN capsule) of more than 2 mm (P < .05), a deposit size of more than 10 mm2 (P < .01), the presence of melanoma cells in perinodal lymphatic vessels (P < .01), and the effacement of nodal architecture by metastatic melanoma cells (P < .05). Our results indicate that some morphologic features of melanoma metastases in SLNs predict the likelihood of further nodal involvement in CLND specimens.     

A model for determining the optimum histology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

AIMS: To create and use a geometrical model for sentinel lymph node (SLN) histopathology in breast cancer. METHODS: The model involves a spherical metastasis randomly situated in an SLN. Two extreme situations are taken as the starting points. In one of these, the metastasis is seen in its largest dimension, whereas in the other it is only just visible, approximating 0 mm in size. Intermediate positions are analysed, with different metastasis sizes and different distances between the levels assessed by histology. RESULTS: The findings suggest that sections taken 1 mm apart afford a reasonable means of identifying almost all metastases measuring > 2 mm (referred to as macrometastases here). For nearly all micrometastases to be identified correctly according to the current TNM definitions (that is, metastases > 0.2 mm), a step sectioning protocol with levels of 250 microm or 200 microm would be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: SLNs are the most likely sites of nodal metastasis. Macrometastases are of recognised prognostic relevance so that all should be identified, preferably correctly as macrometastases; an assessment of levels 1 mm apart appears satisfactory and sufficient for this aim. SLNs also offer an ideal method for the study of the significance of micrometastases; for this, step sections separated by 200 or 250 microm are a good choice.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结术中分子诊断的临床实用性初探

目的 探讨GeneSearchTM乳腺淋巴结检测试剂盒(以下简称GeneSearch)在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)术中诊断的临床实用性.方法 对复旦大学附属肿瘤医院2009年2月至6月诊治的88例乳腺癌患者行SLN活检.首先垂直长轴将所得淋巴结切成数块厚约2 mm的组织块,对各切面进行术中细胞印片后,奇数号组织块用于术后连续切片检查,偶数号组织块采用GeneSearch进行检测,应用即时荧光定量逆转录聚合酶链反应检测SLN中CK19和乳腺球蛋白表达的Ct值.将GeneSearch以术后连续切片的诊断为准,与术中细胞印片、术后连续切片的病理结果分别进行比较.结果 88例共获得225枚SLN,其中宏转移淋巴结27枚,微转移淋巴结9枚,阴性淋巴结189枚(其中5枚为孤立肿瘤细胞).从切割淋巴结开始到最终形成报告,GeneSearch耗时范围为35～45 min(平均40 min).基于淋巴结数目,GeneSearch与术后连续切片的总体符合率为95.6%(215/225),其检测敏感度为86.1%(31/36),均高于术中细胞印片[分别为94.7%(213/225)和72.2%(26/36)].SLN转移灶大小与CKl9和乳腺球蛋白的Ct值存在统计学相关性(P＜0.01).结论 GeneSearch用于SLN术中诊断时,其检测敏感度高于术中细胞印片,达到比较满意的效果,但在应用中仍存在一些问题.     

Detection of micrometastases in bone marrow and sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients

Objective: To study the sensitivity and clinical significance of HE-staining,IHC and RT-PCR in detecting breast cancer micrometastases in bone marrow and sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Methods:After general anesthesia, all patients underwent bone marrow puncture and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by 1% isosulfan blue, and then HE-staining,IHC and RT-PCR were used to detect micrometastases. Results:Of 62 patients with breast cancer whose axillary lymph nodes showed negative HE-staining results, 15 cases presented with positive RT-PCR and 9 cases showed positive IHC results positive in bone marrow micrometastases detection. PT-PCR and IHC showed good uniformity(kappa=0.6945)and there was significant difference in detective rate between these two methods (χ2=4.1667,P=0.0412). In SLN samples, 13 showed positive RT-PCR results, while 7 showed positive IHC results. PT-PCR and IHC showed good uniformity (kappa=0.6483)and significant difference was also found in detective rate between these two methods (χ2=4.1667,P=0.0412). Both bone marrow and SLN samples were RT-PCR positive in 3 cases,which indicated that bone marrow micrometastases did not always accompany SLN micrometastases(χ2=0.067,P=0.796). Conclusion: Even if no axillary lymph node involvement or distant metastases are present in routine preoperative examination, micrometastases can still be detected in bone marrow or SLNs. Because the bone marrow micrometastases and axillary node micrometastses are not present simultaneously, combination test of multiple indicators will detect micrometastases more accurately.     

Cytokeratin immunohistochemical validation of the sentinel node hypothesis in patients with breast cancer

No standard method for handling and histopathologic examination of the sentinel node (SN) exists. We hypothesized that a focused examination of all nodes with serial sectioning and cytokeratin immunohistochemical staining would confirm the SN as the node most likely to harbor metastasis. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy using blue dye and (99m)technetium-labeled sulfur colloid were performed. All nodes were stained with H&E. All tumor-free nodes underwent additional sectioning and staining with H&E and an immunohistochemical stain. Routine H&E examination detected SN metastases in 27.6% of cases. Occult SN metastases were identified in 12.7% of cases. None of the 724 non-SNs examined contained occult metastases. The SN false-negative rate was zero. This study confirms histopathologically that the SN has biologic significance as the axillary node most likely to harbor metastatic tumor Standardization of the handling, sectioning, and staining of the SN is necessary as lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy become integrated into the care of patients with breast cancer     

Implementation of step sectioning in the examination of sentinel lymph nodes to improve the detection of micrometastases in breast cancer patients

The object of this study was to examine whether a new protocol for examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) would lead to the detection of more metastases. Sections of 1 mm would identify most SLN macrometastases, and step sections at intervals of 200-250 μm would identify most micrometastases. A total of 111 breast cancer patients who underwent the SLN procedure at St. Olavs University Hospital in Trondheim, Norway in 2008 were included in the study group. Their SLNs were processed according to a new standardized protocol with sections of 2-3 mm being step sectioned at intervals of 200-250 μm. A total of 109 breast cancer patients undergoing the SLN procedure in 2007 were used as a reference group. Metastases were found in 29% of the cases, compared with 26% in the reference group. Step sectioning of SLNs revealed metastases in five cases initially found to be negative. The metastases of the study group were smaller, with a median value of 1.25 mm compared with 4.25 mm in the reference group. Step sectioning led to the detection of metastases in SLNs initially found to be negative. The median size of the metastases was considerably smaller in the study group than in the reference group.     

p16 expression in sentinel nodes with metastatic breast carcinoma: evaluation of its role in developing triaging strategies for axillary node dissection and a marker of poor prognosis

Not all patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) in a sentinel lymph node (SLN) have metastasis in additional axillary nodes (ANs). A biological marker that can predict this occurrence may be beneficial in triaging only appropriate patients for AN dissection (AND). Our aim was to study p16 expression in SLNs and to determine whether it is a predictor of metastases to additional ANs and a marker of poor prognosis. We correlated p16 expression in SLNs and ANs of 54 patients with MBC with clinicopathologic features and the nodal proliferative index (PI). We sequenced p16 from DNA in 7 cases. We found that 35 of 54 cases (65%) had p16-positive tumor cells. Nine of 17 (53%) cases in which both SLN and AND were done had MBC in additional ANs. The SLNs of 8 of 9 cases (89%) were p16 positive (73% positive predictive value). Eight of 17 (47%) cases had no metastases in ANs even though their SLNs had metastases. The SLNs of 5 of 8 (62.5%) of these cases were p16 negative (83% negative predictive value). Ductal MBCs were p16 positive in 27 of 37 cases (73%). Carcinomas with a lobular component were p16 negative in 9 of 11 cases (82%). Nine of 12 (75%) p16-negative ductal carcinomas were estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Some 75% of T2 and T3 tumors were p16 positive, compared with 50% of T1 tumors. The highest PI (defined as > or =50%) was seen in p16-positive SLNs (5 of 6 cases). The p16 DNA sequence was normal, and no mutations were found. Our findings indicate that p16 expression in SLNs with MBC predicts (1) increased likelihood of metastasis in additional ANS, and its expression along with other markers and clinicopathologic parameters may serve as an indicator for proceeding to a formal AND; (2) poor prognosis and is associated with larger primary tumors with a high nodal PI and ER-negative status; and (3) histological subtypes. Gene mutations were not responsible for the expression of p16 in our cases.     

Complete sectioning of axillary sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. Analysis of two different step sectioning and immunohistochemistry protocols in 246 patients

AIMS: To evaluate two detailed step sectioning protocols for sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). METHODS: After vital dye or combined dye and radiocolloid guided biopsy, SLNs were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. In protocol A, SLNs from 123 patients were sectioned in steps of 50-100 micro m, whereas in protocol B, SLNs from 123 patients were sectioned at steps of 250 micro m. Epithelial marker immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on multiple levels in cases with negative haematoxylin and eosin findings. RESULTS: In groups A and B, 74 and 47 patients were found to have tumour cells in their axillary SLNs, and 19 (28%) and 18 (19%) patients, respectively, were upstaged as compared with the standard histological assessment. Nodal involvement detected by deeper sections was often micrometastatic or in isolated tumour cells CONCLUSIONS: Serial sectioning and IHC are recommended for the evaluation of SLNs. The optimal extent of the histopathological work up should be studied further.