我院护理科研及论文发表情况的调查分析

目的了解目前我院护理科研队伍整体实力和科研水平,为护理科研管理决策提供参考。方法根据国家科技部中国科技信息研究所论文统计分析中心提供的我院2007年在统计源期刊发表的论文数据资料,进行统计分析。随机选取了来自3个病房的50名护士进行科研课题和论文撰写的访谈,对访谈结果进行分析。结果2007年护理人员论文产出量偏少,一定数量的文章可以发表在高水平的专业期刊上,对具体情况分析表明,第一作者以高学历、高职称人员为主。结论我院护理人员现在已经具有向高水平期刊投稿的能力,但仍有部分护理人员存在畏惧情绪。     

Measuring the outputs of Australian nursing research published 1995-2000

AIMS: To analyse the research published in refereed nursing journals by Australian authors from 1995 to 2000. BACKGROUND: Analysis of the research topics and types of methodologies used by Australian nurse researchers has not been recently undertaken. The study was similar to an analysis of United Kingdom (UK) nursing research between 1988 and 1995 to allow comparison between the two countries. DESIGN: A quantitative approach analysed the research abstracts for the topic researched, source of data, location of data collection, paradigm and methodology used and funding source. RESULTS: A total of 509 articles from 11 generalist Australian and UK nursing journals were analysed. The highest numbers of articles were published in Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing and Journal of Advanced Nursing. The most popular topics were education of nurses (18.7%, n=95) and practice issues relating to patient care (15.3%, n=78). However, scant attention was paid to major Australian health issues. Most research was undertaken in the hospital setting (55.8%, n=247). Data were most often drawn from nurses themselves (40.7%, n=206), followed by patients (25.5%, n=129). Both quantitative (41%, n=203) and qualitative approaches (47%, n=230) were employed. A minority of studies acknowledged any funding (14.9%, n=76). CONCLUSIONS: Research findings need to be applied in practice to improve patient care. Nurse researchers need to publish their findings and align their research interests to meet national health priorities. They need to be involved in setting these health priorities to ensure that nursing has a place in health research.     

Clarivate listed nursing journals in 2020: what they publish and how they measure use of social media

Objectives: To investigate what the most common types of articles that nursing journals purport to publish are and what they actually publish. And to investigate the extent to which academic nursing journals listed by Clarivate track alternative metrics.Methods: Journals included in the nursing Journal Citation Report (JCR) journal category in 2019 described as nursing were identified and considered suitable for inclusion in the analysis. Instructions for authors were reviewed online and mention of each type of article is identified. The tables of contents of each issue of each journal published during 2019 were examined and the types of articles published were extracted to a spreadsheet into permitted article types and published articles. Likewise, the use of alternative metrics by each journal was extracted to a spreadsheet. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analysis was applied to investigate the relationship between articles permitted and articles published.Results: In the 2020 JCR, 123 journals were listed. The most common article type permitted was original research (n = 117),followed by review papers (n = 116), and discussion papers (n = 63). Original research (n = 7045); review papers (n = 1268);discussion papers (n = 1225); editorials (n = 793) and commentaries (n = 776) were the most commonly published categories of the article. Of journals examined, 108 (96.8％) tracked mentions on social media and the Altmetric score was most commonly used (75％). There was a strong correlation (r = 0.73; P = 0.002) between the numbers of articles permitted and published and a strong correlation (ρ = 0.86; P < 0.001) in terms of the rankings of the permitted and published articles.Conclusions: There is a relationship between the most frequently permitted article types and those published, especially for the most frequent categories of both. Original articles, review papers, and discussion papers are the backbone of academic publishing in nursing with original articles vastly outweighing review and discussion papers. Most Clarivate listed journals now use some method of tracking alternative metrics indicating how seriously publishers take their social media profiles.     

A bibliometric analysis of core articles of international nursing research frontiers based on the Web of Science database

Objective:To review and analyze the basic information and distribution of core articles in the global research frontier of nursing,so as to ascertain the current trend in the field.Methods:A total of 37 highly cited essential science indicator(ESI)papers in the nursing discipline were retrieved,which were compared with the core article collection of the ESI research frontier in January 2019 to understand the current nursing research frontiers.Subsequently,a statistical analysis of the core articles that constituted the nursing research frontiers was performed using a bibliometric method.The analysis was conducted with multiple aspects including the number of core articles,total number of citations,average publication year,issuing country,participating institution,citing paper,journal distribution,and core researcher.Results:At present,the two international research frontiers of nursing are patient-centered care(Research Frontier 1)and missed care(Research Frontier 2).These two frontiers include a total of 12 core articles,6 of which are highly cited Web of Scienceindexed nursing papers.Research Frontier 1 includes three core articles that were cited 389 times.Research Frontier 2 includes nine core articles that were cited 841 times.Articles in the two frontiers were cited by 454 and 841 papers,respectively,most of which are in the United States.In addition,the 12 core articles were published across eight journals,the impact factors of which are all relatively high.Lastly,Research Frontier 1 involves 11 authors,whereas Research Frontier 2 involves 49 authors,of which seven authors have published more than two articles.Conclusions:The core articles in the frontier of international nursing research demonstrate distinctive features in their issuing country/region,journal distribution,and participating institution.Review and analysis of the core articles of international nursing research frontiers can help nursing staff understand the current research hotspots and consequently perform corresponding scientific research to promote the development of the nursing discipline.     

Publication opportunities in nonnursing journals

The purpose of this article was to identify nonnursing journals that have relevance to nursing, that publish articles that cite the nursing literature and may offer excellent but seldom-considered publication opportunities for nurses. Using 22 indicators derived through citation analysis, 64 nonnursing journals that are highly related to nursing were identified. The authors provide information about these 64 journals related to their subject matter, number of issues annually, and their 2008 impact factor.     

基于Web of Science数据库有关胶质瘤护理研究的文献计量分析

目的 分析胶质瘤护理研究的分布情况,为胶质瘤护理研究提供参考。方法 以Web of Science（WOS）数据库收录1985－2020年相关文献为对象,借助Web of Science数据库提供的文献分析功能和BICOMB软件,对胶质瘤护理相关研究的发表年度、国家和机构分布、来源出版物、作者、被引情况、研究方向及高频关键词进行文献计量分析。结果 共纳入84篇胶质瘤护理相关研究文献,分别发表在53种期刊上,其中护理专业刊物10种。整体发文量呈上升趋势。美国发文量最多。胶质瘤护理研究领域初步形成核心团队。高频关键词显示研究热点集中在姑息治疗、支持性护理干预、流行病学、生活质量、康复等方面。结论 胶质瘤护理研究正在不断发展,现有研究数量仍有待提升。护理人员应紧跟研究热点,针对胶质瘤患者的临床需求,积极开展支持性护理干预和姑息治疗,以指导临床实践。     

Developing specialty knowledge: the case of Australian critical care nursing.

The generation of new knowledge is important to the evolution of the nursing profession and its specialties and is a fundamental requirement for the development of the discipline. This study documents the growth of empirical knowledge in Australian critical care nursing by examining the research published in one critical care specialty journal and a second generalized nursing research journal between 1994 and 1998. The proportion of research published in the specialty journal increased from 25 to 69%, with almost one-half focusing on patient therapies and treatments. The proportion of research in the general journal was consistently high, approximately 80 to 90%, with one to two critical care research articles per year. Nurses were first authors on the vast majority of these research articles. Approximately half of the critical care research focused on patient care. The results support the claim that Australian critical care nurses are conducting research to promote best practice in patient care and are thus contributing to the development of the discipline of nursing.     

Citation analysis of mental health nursing journals: How should we rank thee?

The journal impact factor (JIF), and how best to rate the performance of a journal and the articles they contain, are areas of great debate. The aim of this paper was to assess various ranking methods of journal quality for mental health nursing journals, and to list the top 10 articles that have received the most number of citations to date. Seven mental health nursing journals were chosen for the analysis of citations they received in 2010, as well as their current impact factors from two sources, and other data for ranking purposes. There was very little difference in the top four mental health nursing journals and their overall rankings when combining various bibliometric indicators. That said, the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is currently the highest ranked mental health nursing journal based on JIF, but publishes fewer articles per year compared to other journals. Overall, very few articles received 50 or more citations. This study shows that researchers need to consider more than one ranking method when deciding where to send or publish their research.     

我国老年社区护理研究的系统文献综述研究

目的了解我国老年社区护理研究的发展现况及进展,为我国老年社区护理的理论和实践研究提供有意义的参考。方法采用文献计量分析方法,收集、整理、分析我国老年社区护理研究原始文献,利用SPSS18．0软件建立数据库及录入数据,并对数据进行时间趋势、期刊群分布、学者构成、研究内容、方法学应用等内容的梳理与分析。初步检索汇总得到原始文献494篇。为了排除不相关文献的干扰,保证所查阅到的有关老年社区护理研究文献的准确率,对原始文献做了进一步的处理：一是剔除会议通知、通讯报道、刊物征稿等消息类文献,只选择学术研究性文献;二是剔除重复文献和一稿多投文献,保证同一篇文献只出现1次,最终得到中文相关文献462篇。使用SPSS18．0软件对我国老年社区护理研究的现状、问题进行描述性分析与文献影响的多因素逻辑回归分析,并提出了加强我国老年社区护理研究的对策与建议。结果老年社区护理文献的数量随年度呈递增趋势,且多数来源于期刊的发表。研究的范畴以城市为主,研究对象多为社区护理的需方研究,主要关注社区老年人和慢性病患者,其研究方法由理论探讨与体会总结向干预调查及横断面凋查转向。纳人标准的文献的研究内容中缺少临终关怀的学术报道。临终关怀作为社区护理的重要内容之一,社区老年居民与患者这一群体的重要组成部分,因此应引起护理人员的重视。文献的发表时间是引用率的消极影响因素,即发表时间越晚,被引用的概率越低。期刊的学术质量是引用率的积极影响因素。结论有关老年社区护理研究方面的文献数量增速很快,呈现快速发展的态势,但研究的领域并不均衡,关于社区护理人员素质、护理技能、继续教育与培训方面的实证研究需要给予特别的关注。老年社区护理研究学术质量较高的文献多被收录在双核心期刊和中文核心期刊内,且其引用率也较高,作为学术研究交流平台的科技期刊也应积极采取相应措施鼓励护理工作者与研究者多进行干预调查研究,及时报道其科研成果,从而促进老年社区护理科研的发展。另外从实践上,应加强对老年社区护理人员的职业技能、综合素质及科研能力的培养与教育,从而整体提高老年社区护理研究的质量与科研水平。     

Analysis of a decade of nursing practice research: 1977-1986

The purpose of this study was to analyze the research focus, theoretical bases, research designs, statistical methods, and research findings of nursing practice research, 1977-1986. A secondary purpose was to assess the fit of nursing practice research topics within the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association's (NANDA) taxonomy. The sample consisted of 720 articles that met the definitional criteria of nursing practice research from six major refereed journals in nursing that primarily publish nursing research. Findings showed that 95% of research in nursing in the last decade was conducted by nurses as first authors, over half with doctoral degrees. Funded research increased as well as the trend toward multidisciplinary research and multisite studies. One-third of the studies focused on nursing intervention, and two-thirds were assessment-oriented. Although use of nursing conceptual models increased over the decade, theories or models from psychology, physiology, and sociology were used most often. There was an increase in use of sophisticated research methods and better reporting of reliability and validity. The use of NANDA as a taxonomy for classifying nursing practice research was assessed.     

An analysis of nursing citations and disciplinary characteristics in 79 articles that represent excellence in nursing publication

Development of the knowledge base for a profession depends on research and scholarship that builds on the insights and work of scholars within the discipline and is disseminated through the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine a unique collection of 79 articles selected by editors as representative of their nursing journals. Articles were assessed for congruence with long‐standing values and conceptual definitions of nursing, and the extent to which they built on prior literature published in nursing. Articles were scored based on whether they reflected four characteristics of nursing as a discipline (holism, social context, goal of health, and consistency with common definitions of nursing); an abstract score on the extent to which the title, abstract, or keywords indicated a general focus on nursing; and a distinction score based on whether the article distinguished nurses or nursing from other providers. Fifty of the articles received an article score of 4, indicating all four disciplinary characteristics were present in the article's content. While the majority of the articles were congruent with fundamental nursing values and perspectives, only 28% of the sources cited were from nursing sources. The lack of citations to nursing literature, coupled with an assessment that reveals gaps in substantive content that builds on nursing knowledge, raises questions about the future of nursing perspectives in the literature.     

Trends in publication of research papers by Australian-based nurse authors

Analysis of Australian nursing research output is becoming more important as academic institutions move into implementing quality programs of research output. Notable in determining research quality is the publication of research papers in journals with a high ranking within the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) or Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). This paper reports an analysis of Australian nurse researcher output in journals highly ranked by the ISI and ERA. Research abstracts were analysed for topic, sources of data, location of research and methodological paradigm. A total of 530 articles from five Australian and from five USA and UK journals were analysed. There was an increase in output from the period of prior analyses in 2000. Practice issues are the most common topic followed closely by nurse education. While most studies used nurses as sources of data there were more studies in which consumers of nursing care were the point of inquiry. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were utilised. Given the importance of rationalising nursing practice and adding new knowledge to evidence based care, it is imperative for the nursing profession to disseminate research findings. Failure to do this may result in poor return in investment outcomes for the future of nursing in Australia and internationally.     

近10年我国护理人文关怀能力测评工具研究现状的文献计量学分析

目的:了解我国护理人文关怀量表的研制与应用现状。方法:采用文献计量法和内容分析法对我国2010年1月—2019年12月发表的护理人文关怀量表研制与应用的相关文献进行分析。结果:共纳入文献21篇,其中学位论文14篇(66.67%),期刊文献7篇(33.33%)。第一作者分布于我国11个省、1个直辖市。发文量排名前3位的为湖北省(3篇)、重庆市(3篇)、贵州省(3篇)。发文量排名前3位的单位为遵义医学院(3篇)、南方医科大学(2篇)、华中科技大学(2篇)。研究的核心对象为临床护士与护士长。结论:近10年我国有关护理人文关怀能力测评工具的研究数量逐渐增多;研究对象相对集中,且逐渐细分化;研究以独著为主且缺乏持续性。     

Developments of nursing research within German-speaking countries - publications from 1988 until 2007 in the journal "Pflege"

"Pflege" is the nursing research journal with the largest circulation in the German-speaking area and has been nursing research experts' only communication platform for a considerable time. Analysing the structure of articles aims to focus on development and alteration of the German-speaking region's nursing research. The study consists of a retrospective analysis of publications in the nursing research journal "Pflege". 589 articles from 1988 until 2007 could be included into the analysis. Research questions refer to the amount of empirical studies and the study designs in quantitative projects. Almost 50 % of all publications of the "Pflege" represent results of empirical research; the remaining publications come from "other publications" and increasingly literature reviews. Research designs are mainly simple cross-sectional surveys; only 20 % are intervention studies (including five randomised controlled trials). The importance of intervention studies will increase in future. This development cannot be seen in the "Pflege". There is a need for further bibliometric analysis to be conducted to find out whether German-speaking nurse researchers actually seldom conduct intervention studies, or whether they prefer to publish in journals with a high impact factor.     

Reviewing the review process: towards good practice in the peer review of manuscripts submitted to nursing journals

Publishing in peer reviewed journals is an essential activity for nurses working in higher education. This paper offers some reflections on the processes involve in the reviewing of articles submitted for publication, and explores some ways in which this system may be improved.All journals operate some kind of review process. This can range from, at one end, the editor making decisions about the suitability for publication of a submitted paper to, at the other end, papers being blind-reviewed by two (or sometimes more) external referees. This paper notes that there appears to be little or no consistency amongst the various nursing journals with respect to reviewing processes.Suggestions put forward in this article for consideration include: the standardisation of peer review systems across journals; the construction of guidelines for referees which caution against ad hominem attacks on authors; and the introduction of 'open' reviewing.     

Citation analysis of the maternal/child nursing literature

Few bibliometric studies have been done of the nursing literature; however, much can be learned about nursing and specialty areas of clinical practice by examining the articles published in nursing journals. The purposes of this study were to describe the extent of research, clinical, and evidence-based practice articles published in maternal/child nursing journals and the information sources used to develop that literature. A total of 112 articles and 2571 citations from three randomly selected maternal/child nursing journals were analyzed. Nearly half (n=51, 46%) of all articles were reports of original research studies. Research publications were cited most frequently including research studies published in medical journals (n=687, 26.7% of all the cited documents), followed by research studies published in nursing journals (n=371, 14.4%) and journals in other disciplines. The maternal/child nursing journals examined in this study are disseminating research findings to nurses for use in clinical practice.