Relationship Between Hip Extensor Strength and Back Extensor Length in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hip extensor strength and back extensor length in patients with low back pain (LBP) and healthy controls.MethodsIn 266 patients with LBP and 215 matched controls, back extensor length and hip extensor strength were measured and compared in the 2 groups using an independent t test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine correlation between these 2 variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test the risk of sustaining LBP with having these muscle insufficiencies.ResultsA significant difference in hip extensor strength was found between patients with LBP and controls (P < .001). Back extensor length was different in healthy men compared with the patients with LBP (P < .001) but was not significant between women with and without LBP (P = .34). The results showed a significant relationship between back extensor length and hip extensor strength in men with LBP (r = 0.6, P = .01). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that having a weak hip extensor (P = .001) or shortened back extensor (P = .01) could increase the risk of LBP occurrence.ConclusionThe findings support the assumptions of the presence of muscle imbalance of hip extensor weakness and back extensor tightness in male patients with LBP and that each muscle impairment may contribute to LBP.     

Multifidus atrophy is localized and bilateral in active persons with chronic unilateral low back pain

Beneck GJ, Kulig K. Multifidus atrophy is localized and bilateral in active persons with chronic unilateral low back pain.ObjectiveTo compare the lumbar multifidi muscle volume devoid of fat local to the site of pain in persons with and without chronic unilateral lower lumbar pain.DesignProspective cross-sectional design.SettingUniversity biokinesiology laboratory.ParticipantsActive individuals (n=14) with chronic unilateral lower lumbar pain (>1y) were matched for age, height, weight, and activity level with healthy individuals (n=14). Individuals with back pain had minimal disability (Oswestry Disability Index [mean ± SD], 14.9%±6.3%) at the time of testing.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresMultifidus and erector spinae muscle volumes at the L5-S1 levels, multifidus muscle volumes at the L4 and S2-3 levels.ResultsAverage multifidus volume was diminished by 18.1% between groups (P=.026) only at the L5-S1 levels. There was no difference between painful and pain-free sides. There were no volume differences between groups above L5, below S1, or in erector spinae at the L5-S1 levels.ConclusionsThe results of this study indicate that despite a low level of disability and an activity level similar to that of matched control subjects, considerable localized, bilateral multifidus atrophy is present. Such impaired size of the multifidus will likely reduce its capacity to control intersegmental motion, thus increasing the susceptibility to further injury. Unlike acute unilateral low back pain (LBP), muscle size is reduced bilaterally in persons with chronic unilateral LBP.     

Treatment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction With Hypertonic Dextrose Injection (Prolotherapy): A Randomized Controlled Trial With Long-term Partial Crossover

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and longer-term effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy injections in participants with temporomandibular dysfunction.Patients and MethodsA randomized controlled trial with masked allocation was conducted from January 14, 2013, through December 19, 2015. Forty-two participants (with 54 joints) meeting temporomandibular dysfunction criteria were randomized (1:1) to 3 monthly intra-articular injections (20% dextrose/0.2% lidocaine or 0.2% lidocaine) followed by as-needed dextrose/0.2% lidocaine injections through 1 year. Primary and secondary outcome measures included a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale score for facial pain and jaw dysfunction; maximal interincisal opening (MIO) measured in millimeters, percentage of joints with 50% or more change (improvement) in pain and function, and satisfaction.ResultsRandomization produced a control group with more female participants (P=.03), longer pain duration (P=.01), and less MIO (P=.01). Upon 3-month analysis, including pertinent covariates, dextrose group participants reported decreased jaw pain (4.3±2.9 points vs 1.8±2.7 points; P=.02), jaw dysfunction (3.5±2.8 points vs 1.0±2.1 points; P=.008), and improved MIO (1.5±4.1 mm vs ?1.8±5.1 mm; P=.006). Control group participants received dextrose injections beginning at 3 months. No between-group differences were noted at 12 months; pooled data suggested that jaw pain, jaw function, and MIO improved by 5.2±2.7 points (68%), 4.1±2.8 points (64%), and 2.1±5.5 mm, respectively. Pain and dysfunction improved by at least 50% in 38 of 54 (70%) and 39 of 54 (72%) jaws, respectively.ConclusionIntra-articular dextrose injection (prolotherapy) resulted in substantial improvement in jaw pain, function, and MIO compared with masked control injection at 3 months; clinical improvements endured to 12 months. Satisfaction was high.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01706172     

Does core stability exercise improve lumbopelvic stability (through endurance tests) more than general exercise in chronic low back pain? A quasi-randomized controlled trial

Introduction: The aim was to compare core stability and general exercises (GEs) in chronic low back pain (LBP) patients based on lumbopelvic stability (LPS) assessment through three endurance core stability tests. There is a controversy about preference of core stability exercise (CSE) over other types of exercise for chronic LBP. Studies which have compared these exercises used other outcomes than those related to LPS. As it is claimed that CSE enhances back stability, endurance tests for LPS were used. Materials and Methods: A 16-session CSE program and a GE program with the same duration were conducted for two groups of participants. Frequency of interventions for both groups was three times a week. Forty-three people (aged 18–60 years) with chronic non-specific LBP were alternately allocated to core stability (n = 22) or GE group (n = 21) when admitted. The primary outcomes were three endurance core stability tests including: (1) trunk flexor; (2) trunk extensor; and (3) side bridge tests. Secondary outcomes were disability and pain. Measurements were taken at baseline and the end of the intervention. Results: After the intervention, test times increased and disability and pain decreased within groups. There was no signi?cant difference between two groups in increasing test times (p = 0.23 to p = 0.36) or decreasing disability (p = 0.16) and pain (p = 0.73). Conclusions: CSE is not more effective than GE for improving endurance core stability tests and reducing disability and pain in chronic non-specific LBP patients.     

A detailed characterisation of pain,disability, physical and psychological features of a small group of adolescents with non-specific chronic low back pain

The objective of the study was to provide a detailed biopsychosocial evaluation of adolescent NSCLBP compared to those without LBP. NSCLBP was described by pain level, duration, levels of disability and kinesiophobia, aggravating factors and functional movements. Each pain subject was sub-classified using the O'Sullivan system. Groups were compared on physical activity levels, sitting posture, trunk extensor and thigh muscle endurance, psychosocial behaviour, depression, family functioning and exposure to stressful life events. Adolescents with NSCLBP reported moderate levels of pain (4.4/10 ± 1.9), disability (17.9 ± 10.1%) and fear avoidance beliefs (36.1/68 ± 7.1). Differences between control and pain groups were only found for back muscle (p = 0.033) and squat endurance times (p = 0.032) and stressful life events (p = 0.030). Differences in sitting posture between pain and no pain groups were only found when pain subjects were sub-classified (lumbar angle p = 0.001). In conclusion, adolescents with NSCLBP reported moderate pain and disability with deficits in trunk and squat endurance. That they remained physically active is at odds with the activity avoidance and subsequent deconditioning model proposed for adults with NSCLBP. Differences between control and pain groups on history of stressful life events suggest this may contribute to adolescent NSCLBP. Differences with sitting posture are only seen when patients were sub-classified.     

An Exploratory Analysis of Gender as a Potential Modifier of Treatment Effect Among Patients in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Acupuncture and Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain

ObjectiveTo identify the potential association of self-reported gender on pain and disability among patients in a randomized controlled trial of integrative acupuncture and spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) for low back pain (LBP).MethodsIn the original study, 100 participants with LBP were randomized to receive acupuncture, SMT, or both combined. Eighty completed treatment and were followed for 60 days. Primary outcome measures were the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and numeric pain scales. This study was a secondary analysis and used regression models to estimate and test for gender-specific differences in outcomes from baseline through end of treatment.ResultsWomen assigned to acupuncture averaged a 3.8-point reduction in highest LBP vs 2.0 points for SMT, whereas men assigned to SMT averaged a 3.5-point reduction vs 1.8 points for acupuncture (P for interaction = .04). There was a trend toward the same for disability (P for interaction = .12). For women, acupuncture alone led to better outcomes without SMT, and for men, SMT alone led to better outcomes without acupuncture. Women who received acupuncture were more likely to experience 50% or greater reductions in disability and pain, whereas men who received SMT were more likely to experience 50% or greater reductions in disability and pain.ConclusionAn association was found between self-reported gender and response to LBP treatment. Women demonstrated a greater reduction in pain and disability with acupuncture and men with SMT. Future clinical trials should consider sex as a potential determinant of treatment outcomes for LBP.     

Back Muscle Function in Older Women With Age-Related Hyperkyphosis: A Comparative Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare static maximal back extensor muscle force, endurance, and characteristics of flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) in older women with and without age-related hyperkyphosis.MethodsMaximum back extensor force and endurance measured in a sitting position with a designed load cell setup; appearance, onset, and offset angles of FRP; and extension relaxation ratio (ERR) during a dynamic flexion-extension task were compared between 24 older women with hyperkyphosis (thoracic kyphosis angle ≥50°), mean age 65 ± 4.4 years, and 24 older women without hyperkyphosis (thoracic kyphosis angle ?50°), mean age 63 ± 4.3 years. Variables of force, endurance, angles of FRP, and ERR were analyzed using an independent sample t test. A χ² test was used to identify differences between groups in FRP appearance.ResultsStatic back extensor force and endurance were significantly lower among those with versus those without hyperkyphosis (P ? .001). Although the 2 groups did not differ in FRP appearance and ERR in the superficial erector spinal muscles (P ? .05), FRP in the hyperkyphosis group started sooner and ended later than in the group without hyperkyphosis (P ? .05).ConclusionOur study indicates that women with age-related hyperkyphosis had decreased static maximal force and endurance of the back extensor muscles and prolonged myoelectrical silence of the superficial erector spinal muscles. Reduced endurance of the superficial erector spinal muscles may trigger early onset of FRP and prolonged relaxation of these muscles.     

Association of Functional Disability and Biopsychosocial Factors in Older Adults With Low Back Pain Who Live in the Amazonas State Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify social and clinical factors associated with levels of functional disability (FD) in older adults with low back pain (LBP) in the city of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.MethodsA cross-sectional study of 557 adults with LBP aged ≥60 years was completed. Sociodemographic and clinical features, pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), FD (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short version), body mass index, educational level, health perception, emotional level, and self-reported diseases were evaluated. Statistical analysis was used to verify the association between quantitative variables and a group; Student t test or Mann-Whitney test, and analysis of variance (normality assumption) or Kruskal-Wallis test (non-parametric), P value of less than .05.ResultsThere were 81.3% female participants, 54.9% self-reported their race and/or skin color as brown, and 37.8% were sedentary. Pain intensity scores were 6.26 ± 2.19 in female participants and 5.82 ± 1.84 in male participants. Mean FD scores were 11.68 ± 6.08 for female participants and 9.61 ± 5.76 for males participants, although 39.7% of the total group presented with severe disability (score ≥14) and FD was associated with female sex (P = .001), physical activity (P ≤ 0.001), body mass index (P ≤ .001), emotional level (P < .001), and health perception (P < .001).ConclusionIn this group of older adults with LBP, FD was associated with female sex, level of physical activity, body mass index, emotional level, and health perception. Many factors that were identified with FD are modifiable; therefore, interventions, such as nutrition education and re-conceptualization of self-emotional and health perception, may have potential to help in preventing and reducing FD.     

The effects of myofascial release technique for patients with low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe purpose of this meta-analytic review was to quantitatively examine the effects of myofascial release technique (MFR) on pain intensity, back disability, lumbar range of motion, and quality of life in patients with low back pain (LBP).MethodsPotential articles were retrieved using five electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang). The search period was from inception to January 27, 2021. Two researchers independently completed record retrieval and selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of MFR on pain intensity, back disability, lumbar range of motion, and quality of life in LBP patients were included. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random effects models and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI).ResultsData from eight RCTs (386 patients with back pain) meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted for meta-analysis with methodological quality assessment scores ranging from 6 to 10. Compared to the control intervention, MFR induced significant decrease in back disability (SMD = −0.35, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = −0.68, –0.02, P = 0.04, I² = 46 %, n = 284). MFR induced non-significant decrease in the pain intensity (SMD = −0.12, 95 % confidence interval[CI] = −0.35, 0.11, P = 0.32, I² = 0%, n = 294), non-significant improvement in quality of life (SMD = −0.09, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = −0.46, 0.28, P = 0.62, I² = 0%, n = 114), and non-significant improvement in lumbar range of motion (Flexion SMD = 0.57,95 % confidence interval [CI] = −0.09, 1.24, P = 0.09, I² = 54 %, n = 80) (Extension SMD = 0.68, 95 % confidence interval[CI] = −0.72, 2.08, P = 0.34, I² = 89 %, n = 80) (Right flexion SMD = 0.05, 95 % confidence interval[CI] = −0.90, 0.99, P = 0.92, I² = 78 %, n = 80) (Left flexion SMD = 0.14, 95 % confidence interval[CI] = −0.59, 0.88, P = 0.70, I² = 64 %, n = 80).ConclusionThe findings suggest that MFR can improve the effect of physical therapy alone and exercise therapy alone, and that MFR can be an effective adjuvant therapy. Meta-analysis showed that MFR has a significant effect on reducing back disability in patients with low back pain, but no significant effect on reducing pain intensity, improving quality of life, and improving lumbar range of motion.     

Effects of a Remotely Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Coaching Program on the Self-Rated Functional Disability of Participants with Low Back Pain

PurposeA remotely delivered cognitive behavioral coaching (CBC) program was offered as a service benefit for commercial health plan members with low back pain (LBP). This study describes changes in self-rated functional disability in a sample of plan members participating in the program (N=423).MethodsIndependent measures included demographics, length of program enrollment, total CBC sessions, and baseline self-reported patient activation and presenteeism levels. Participants rated their functional disability level due to LBP using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Dependent outcomes quantified change in participant functional disability rating (final ODI score minus baseline ODI score). Nonparametric tests compare differences between groups and within-group ODI score change. Two generalized linear models test for associations between independent variables and the ODI change score.ResultsA significant difference between baseline and final ODI scores was observed at the overall program level (p<.001) and within all independent variable categories of interest. Over 68% of total participants (n=289) reported improved functional ability from baseline to final (decrease in ODI score). Participants who completed more CBC sessions demonstrated significantly greater improvement in functional ability (p=.038) compared to those who completed fewer sessions. Participants aged 55 and older were significantly more likely to show deterioration in functional ability from baseline to final (p=.021).ConclusionOutcomes suggest that program participation can influence self-rated functional disability in the management of LBP.     

Association Between Psychosocial Parameters and Response to Chiropractic Care Among Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine whether baseline self-efficacy, fear of pain with movement (kinesiophobia), or change in either were associated with clinically important improvement in disability among older adults with chronic low back pain after 12 weeks of chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) and exercise.MethodsThis secondary analysis used randomized trial data from community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older with chronic spinal disability who received non-pharmacological treatment of CSM and exercise. Those with ≥30% reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after 12 weeks of treatment were considered responders to care. Psychosocial measures included the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Logistic regression–assessed associations were between psychosocial, demographic, and low back predictors and 30% ODI improvement.ResultsThere were 176 community-dwelling older adults included in this analysis. Mean age was 71 years, 59.7% were women; 176 (96.7%) had complete data. Baseline disability (ODI = 26.1 ± 9.3) and back pain (5.0 ± 1.9, 0-10 scale) were moderate. Baseline PSEQ reflected higher self-efficacy (47.7 ± 7.8, 0-60 scale) with minimal kinesiophobia (TSK 34.3 ± 5.2, 17-68 scale). Seventy-two (40.9%) achieved 30% reduction in ODI (mean –5.4 ± 7.9) after 12 weeks of treatment. Mean self-efficacy improvement was clinically important (2.5 ± 6.5 points); kinesiophobia (–2.7 ± 4.4 points) and LBP (–1.6 points) also improved. Baseline PSEQ and percent improvement in PSEQ and TSK were associated with response to treatment in univariate regression analyses but not in multiple regression models that included low back predictors. LBP duration >4 years negatively impacted recovery.ConclusionsAmong this sample of older adults who received chiropractic manipulation and exercise, baseline self-efficacy and improvements in self-efficacy and kinesiophobia were individually associated with clinically important reductions in disability post-intervention, although not in adjusted models when LBP duration was included.     

Activity-Based Therapy for Recovery of Walking in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectiveTo examine the effects of activity-based therapy (ABT) on neurologic function, walking ability, functional independence, metabolic health, and community participation.DesignRandomized controlled trial with delayed treatment design.SettingOutpatient program in a private, nonprofit rehabilitation hospital.ParticipantsVolunteer sample of adults (N=48; 37 men and 11 women; age, 18–66y) with chronic (≥12mo postinjury), motor-incomplete (ASIA Impairment Scale grade C or D) spinal cord injury (SCI).InterventionsA total of 9h/wk of ABT for 24 weeks including developmental sequencing; resistance training; repetitive, patterned motor activity; and task-specific locomotor training. Algorithms were used to guide group allocation, functional electrical stimulation utilization, and locomotor training progression.Main Outcome MeasuresNeurologic function (International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury); walking speed and endurance (10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test, and Timed Up and Go test); community participation (Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III, and Reintegration to Normal Living Index); and metabolic function (weight, body mass index, and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check).ResultsSignificant improvements in neurologic function were noted for experimental versus control groups (International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury total motor score [5.1±6.3 vs 0.9±5.0; P=.024] and lower extremity motor score [4.2±5.2 vs −0.6±4.2; P=.004]). Significant differences between experimental and control groups were observed for 10-meter walk test speed (0.096±0.14m/s vs 0.027±0.10m/s; P=.036) and 6-minute walk test total distance (35.97±48.2m vs 3.0±25.5m; P=.002).ConclusionsABT has the potential to promote neurologic recovery and enhance walking ability in individuals with chronic, motor-incomplete SCI. However, further analysis is needed to determine for whom ABT is going to lead to meaningful clinical benefits.     

Postamputation Cognitive Impairment Is Related to Worse Perceived Physical Function Among Middle-Aged and Older Prosthesis Users

ObjectiveTo compare characteristics between middle-aged and older prosthesis users with and without cognitive impairment and determine whether cognitive impairment contributes to variability in perceived physical function.DesignCross-sectional, observational studySettingGeneral community.ParticipantsAdults 45 years or older, at least 1-year post lower limb amputation (LLA) who were walking independently with a prosthesis (N=119).InterventionNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresWe identified cognitive impairment using an education-adjusted Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified score. Perceived physical function was measured using the Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire.ResultsOf 119 participants (mean age, 62.6±8.2 years; male: 89.1%; vascular etiology: 82.4%; years since amputation: 4.9±4.7 years), 28 (23.5%) had cognitive impairment. Compared with participants without cognitive impairment, those with cognitive impairment were more likely to use an assistive device (60.7% vs 25.3%, P=.002); were older (66.3±7.3 vs 61.5±8.1 years, P=.006) and had more chronic conditions (7.1±3.4 vs 5.4±2.5, P=.004), more depressive symptoms (6.6±5.1 vs 4.2±3.8, P=.008), and worse perceived physical function (2.0±0.6 vs 2.6±0.7, P<.001). Using backward stepwise linear regression, we found that participants with cognitive impairment had worse perceived physical function (standardized parameter estimate [β]=?0.15, P=.02), even after adjusting for depressive symptoms (β=?0.31, P<.001), prosthesis satisfaction (β=0.34, P<.001), number of chronic conditions (β=?0.19, P=.006), and assistive device use (β_cane=0.01, P=.93; β_other=?0.20, P=.003). Together, these variables explained 59% of perceived physical function variability.ConclusionsCognitive impairment is common and associated with worse perceived physical function post LLA, even after controlling for physical and mental health differences. Tailored rehabilitation interventions may be needed to improve perceived physical function in prosthesis users with cognitive impairment.     

The effect of six weeks of sling exercise training on trunk muscular strength and endurance for clients with low back pain

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 6 weeks sling exercise training for clients with low back pain on the levels of pain, disability, muscular strength and endurance. [Subjects and Methods] Twelve chronic LBP subjects participated in this study. Subjects were randomly divided into a control group and a training group. Subjects in the training group performed sling exercise training for six weeks, and participants in the control group did not perform any exercise. [Results] Pain, disability levels and muscular strength significantly improved in the training group, but not in the control group. The left multifidus showed a significant improvement in muscular endurance, measured as the slope of the median frequency after training. [Conclusion] Six weeks of sling exercise training was effective at reducing pain intensity, and improving the disability level and trunk muscular strength of subjects with low back pain.Key words: Chronic low back pain, Sling exercise training, Slope of median frequency     

Preventing Progression to Chronicity in First Onset, Subacute Low Back Pain: An Exploratory Study

Slater MA, Weickgenant AL, Greenberg MA, Wahlgren DR, Williams RA, Carter C, Patterson TL, Grant I, Garfin SR, Webster JS, Atkinson JH. Preventing progression to chronicity in first onset, subacute low back pain: an exploratory study.

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of a behavioral medicine intervention, relative to an attention control, in preventing chronic pain and disability in patients with first-onset, subacute low back pain (LBP) with limitations in work-role function.

Design

A 2-group, experimental design with randomization to behavioral medicine or attention control groups.

Setting

Orthopedic clinic at a Naval Medical Center.

Participants

Sixty-seven participants with first-onset LBP of 6 to 10 weeks of duration and impairment in work function, of whom 50 completed all 4 therapy sessions and follow-up 6 months after pain onset.

Intervention

Four 1-hour individual treatment sessions of either behavioral medicine, focused on back function and pain education, self-management training, graded activity increases, fear reduction, and pain belief change; or attention control condition, focused on empathy, support, and reassurance.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was proportion of participants classified as recovered, according to pre-established clinical cutoffs on standardized measures, signifying absence of chronic pain and disability at 6 months after pain onset. Secondary analyses were conducted on pain, disability, health status, and functional work category. Intervention credibility and pain belief manipulation checks were also evaluated.

Results

Chi square analyses comparing proportions recovered at 6 months after pain onset for behavioral medicine and attention control participants found relative rates of 52% versus 31% in the modified intent-to-treat sample (P=.09) and 54% versus 23% for those completing all 4 sessions and 6-month follow-up (P=.02). At 12 months, 79% of recovered and 68% of chronic pain participants still met criteria for their respective groups (P<.0001). Recovered participants also had higher rates of functional work status recovery at 12 months (recovered: 96% full duty and 4% light duty; chronic pain: 61% full duty, 18% light duty, and 21% medical discharge, respectively; P=.03).

Conclusions

Early intervention using a behavioral medicine rehabilitation approach may enhance recovery and reduce chronic pain and disability in patients with first-onset, subacute LBP. Effects are stronger for participants attending all 4 sessions and the follow-up assessment.     

Physical and functional measures related to low back pain in individuals with lower-limb amputation: an exploratory pilot study

For this study, we compared the physical impairments and functional deficits of individuals with lower-limb amputation (LLA) for those with and without low back pain (LBP). Nineteen participants with LLA were placed into two groups based on visual analog scores of LBP. We assessed functional limitations, iliopsoas length, hamstring length, abdominal strength, back extensor strength, and back extensor endurance. Data analysis included correlations and t-tests. We found significant correlations between pain score and functional limitations, iliopsoas length, and back extensor endurance. We also detected significant differences in functional limitations, iliopsoas length, back extensor strength, and back extensor endurance between those with and without LBP. We saw significant differences in back extensor strength and back extensor endurance between those with transtibial and transfemoral amputations. Differences exist in physical measures of individuals with LLA with and without LBP. Clinicians should consider these impairments in individuals with amputation who experience LBP. Because of the participants' characteristics, these findings may be applicable to veterans with LLA.     

Effect of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides on Stiffness of Lumbar Stabilizer Muscles in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) on muscular stiffness by using ultrasound shear wave elastography, pain, and function in patients with nonspecific low back pain.MethodsIn a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, 30 participants with nonspecific low back pain were randomly divided into 2 groups: a real SNAG group (aged 21.0 ± 1.7, 5 men, 10 women) and sham SNAG group (aged 20.4 ± 0.5, 4 men, 11 women). Muscular stiffness of the multifidus and erector spinal muscles with ultrasound shear wave elastography, visual analog scale, the sit and reach, flamingo balance, the functional reach, side bridge, and Biering-Sorensen tests were made before and immediately after intervention. The Oswestry Disability Index score was recorded only baseline.ResultsAfter intervention, the change in visual analog scale, sit and reach, Biering-Sorensen, and side bridge tests scores were significantly different between real SNAG and sham SNAG groups (P < .05), but there was no significant difference in functional reach and flamingo balance test scores between the groups (P > .05). There was no significant difference for all measurements between pre- and post-intervention in sham SNAG group (P > .05). There was a significant reduction in muscular stiffness in the real SNAG group. But there was no change in muscular stiffness between pre- and postintervention in the sham group (P > .05).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the Mulligan SNAG technique had a positive effect on pain severity, flexibility, trunk muscle endurance, and muscle stiffness in patients with nonspecific LBP.     

Movement-Evoked Pain Versus Widespread Pain: A Longitudinal Comparison in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain From the Delaware Spine Studies

It is currently unknown which pain-related factors contribute to long-term disability and poorer perceived health among older adults with chronic low back pain (LBP). This investigation sought to examine the unique influence of movement-evoked pain (MeP) and widespread pain (WP) on longitudinal health outcomes (ie, gait speed, perceived disability, and self-efficacy) in 250 older adults with chronic LBP. MeP was elicited with 3 standardized functional tests, while presence of WP was derived from the McGill Pain Map. Robust regression with HC3 standard errors was used to examine associations between these baseline pain variables and health outcomes at 12-month follow-up. Covariates for these models included age, sex, body mass index, resting and recall LBP intensity, LBP duration, depression, pain catastrophizing, and baseline outcome (eg, baseline gait speed). Greater MeP was independently associated with worse 12-month LBP-related disability (b = .384, t = 2.013, P = .046) and poorer self-efficacy (b = -.562, t = -2.074, P = .039); but not gait speed (P > .05). In contrast, WP and resting and recall LBP intensity were not associated with any prospective health outcome after adjustment (all P > .05). Compared to WP and resting and recall LBP intensity, MeP is most strongly related to longitudinal health outcomes in older adults with chronic LBP.PerspectiveThis article establishes novel independent associations between MeP and worse perceived disability and self-efficacy at 12-months in older adults with chronic LBP. MeP likely has biopsychosocial underpinnings and consequences and may therefore be an important determinant of health outcomes in LBP and other geriatric chronic pain populations.     

Real-World Adherence to OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Spasticity: Insights From the ASPIRE Study

ObjectiveTo identify baseline characteristics and treatment-related variables that affect adherence to onabotulinumtoxinA treatment from the Adult Spasticity International Registry (ASPIRE) study.DesignProspective, observational registry (NCT01930786).SettingInternational clinical sites.ParticipantsAdults with spasticity (N=730).InterventionsOnabotulinumtoxinA at clinician's discretion.Main Outcome MeasuresClinically meaningful thresholds used for treatment adherent (≥3 treatment sessions during 2-year study) and nonadherent (≤2 sessions). Data analyzed using logistic regression and presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Treatment-related variables assessed at sessions 1 and 2 only.ResultsOf the total population, 523 patients (71.6%) were treatment adherent with 5.3±1.6 sessions and 207 (28.4%) were nonadherent with 1.5±0.5 sessions. In the final model (n=626/730), 522 patients (83.4%) were treatment adherent and 104 (16.6%) were nonadherent. Baseline characteristics associated with adherence: treated in Europe (OR=1.84; CI, 1.06-3.21; P=.030) and use of orthotics (OR=1.88; CI, 1.15-3.08; P=.012). Baseline characteristics associated with nonadherence: history of diplopia (OR=0.28; CI, 0.09-0.89; P=.031) and use of assistive devices (OR=0.51; CI, 0.29-0.90; P=.021). Treatment-related variables associated with nonadherence: treatment interval ≥15 weeks (OR=0.43; CI, 0.26-0.72; P=.001) and clinician dissatisfaction with onabotulinumtoxinA to manage pain (OR=0.18; CI, 0.05-0.69; P=.012). Of the population with stroke (n=411), 288 patients (70.1%) were treatment adherent with 5.3±1.6 sessions and 123 (29.9%) were nonadherent with 1.5±0.5 session. In the final stroke model (n=346/411), 288 patients (83.2%) were treatment adherent and 58 (16.8%) were nonadherent. Baseline characteristics associated with adherence: treated in Europe (OR=2.99; CI, 1.39-6.44; P=.005) and use of orthotics (OR=3.18; CI, 1.57-6.45; P=.001). Treatment-related variables associated with nonadherence: treatment interval ≥15 weeks (OR=0.42; CI, 0.21-0.83; P=.013) and moderate/severe disability on upper limb Disability Assessment Scale pain subscale (OR=0.40; CI, 0.19-0.83; P=.015).ConclusionsThese ASPIRE analyses demonstrate real-world patient and clinical variables that affect adherence to onabotulinumtoxinA and provide insights to help optimize management strategies to improve patient care.     

Effects of Multimodal Inpatient Rehabilitation vs Conventional Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Recovery After Esophageal Cancer Surgery

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of multimodal rehabilitation initiated immediately after esophageal cancer surgery on physical recovery compared with conventional pulmonary rehabilitation.DesignRetrospective study.SettingPrivate quaternary care hospital.ParticipantsFifty-nine inpatients (N=59) who participated in either conventional pulmonary rehabilitation (n=30) or in multimodal rehabilitation (n=29) after esophageal cancer surgery were included.InterventionsBoth groups performed pulmonary exercises, including deep breathing, chest expansion, inspiratory muscle training, coughing, and manual vibration. In the conventional pulmonary rehabilitation group, light-intensity mat exercise, stretching, and walking were performed. The multimodal rehabilitation group performed resistance exercises and moderate- to high-intensity aerobic interval exercises using a bicycle.Main Outcome MeasuresThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), pain, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 30-second chair stand test, and grip strengths were assessed before and after the rehabilitation programs.ResultsSymptom scales of pain, dyspnea, and insomnia in the EORTC QLQ-C30 as well as 6MWT improved significantly after each program (P<.05). 6MWT (73.1±52.6 vs 28.4±14.3, P<.001, d=1.15), 30-second chair stand test (3.5±3.9 vs 0.35±2.0, P<.001, d=1.06), and left grip strength (1.2±1.3 vs 0.0±1.5, P=.002, d=0.42) improved significantly in the multimodal rehabilitation group compared with the pulmonary rehabilitation group. While right grip strength also showed more improvement for those undergoing the multimodal program, the mean strength difference was not clinically meaningful.ConclusionsA multimodal inpatient rehabilitation program instituted early after esophageal cancer surgery improved endurance for walking more than conventional pulmonary rehabilitation as measured by the 6MWT and the 30-second chair stand test.