Comparison of intravenous ascorbic acid versus intravenous iron for functional iron deficiency in hemodialysis patients

The effect of intravenous ascorbic acid was compared with that of intravenous iron in the treatment of functional iron deficiency, as defined as serum ferritin levels over 300 ng/ml and serum iron levels below 50 microg/dl, in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Thirteen patients on chronic hemodialysis with functional iron deficiency received intravenous injections of ascorbic acid, 100 mg, three times a week, after hemodialysis. The therapy was continued until serum ferritin decreased to below 300 ng/ml (3 months at the maximum). The iron and control group were composed of patients who had serum iron levels below 50 microg/dl within 3 months after serum ferritin rose to over 300 ng/ml. Seven patients with the iron group received more than a total of 10 intravenous injections of saccharated ferric oxide (40 mg/dose) after hemodialysis, and seven patients with the control group received no iron preparation during the 3 months. In the ascorbic acid group, while hemoglobin did not change from 10.9 +/- 0.5 g/dl (mean +/- SE) during the three-month period, serum iron increased significantly from 37 +/- 4 microg/dl to 49 +/- 4 microg/dl after one month (p<0.01), and remained elevated until the end of the three-month period. Serum ferritin decreased significantly from 607 +/- 118 ng/ml to 354 +/- 30 ng/ml after 3 months (p<0.01). In the iron group, hemoglobin and serum iron increased significantly from the respective pre-treatment levels during the 2-month period, and serum ferritin rose significantly after 3 months. In the control group, hemoglobin, serum iron and ferritin levels decreased significantly from the respective pre-treatment levels during the 3 months. The recombinant erythropoietin dose remained stable for three months in the ascorbic acid, iron, and control groups, respectively. These results suggest that in hemodialysis patients with a functional iron deficiency, treatment with intravenous ascorbic acid can prevent iron overload due to treatment with intravenous iron, and provide a useful adjuvant means of maintaining hemoglobin and serum iron levels.     

Intravenous ascorbic acid in hemodialysis patients with functional iron deficiency: a clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients with functional iron deficiency (FID) often develop resistance to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo). In these patients, iron therapy may be a hazard, leading to iron overload and consequently to hemosiderosis. Recent studies suggest that intravenous ascorbic acid (IVAA) may circumvent rHuEpo resistance. The aim of our study was to show the effects of IVAA on FID and whether this results in a better correction of anemia in HD patients with stable hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and FID. METHODS: Twenty-seven HD patients with serum ferritin >300 microg/l, transferrin saturation (TS) <20% and hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL were selected andrandomly divided into two groups to enter a cross-over trial with IVAA. In group I IV vitamin C 500 mg was administered three times a week for three months and discontinued in the next three months of the study. Vitamin C was not given the first three months in group II (control group, first three months of the study), who then received 500 mg IV three times a week for the next three months. RESULTS: Hb and TS% significantly increased (baselines vs 3 months, Hb 9.2 +/- 0.2 vs 10.0 +/- 0.3 g/dL, TS% 17.5 +/- 0.6 vs 25.7 +/- 1.7, respectively p < 0.01 and p <0.001) in group I after three months; ferritin fell significantly from 572 +/- 40 to 398 +/- 55 microg/L (p<0.004). Ten patients completed the study: mean Hb and TS% fell significantly (3 months vs final, Hb 9.9 +/- 0.3 vs 8.9 +/- 0.2 g/dL, TS% 25.1 +/- 1.2 vs 19.1 +/- 1.1, respectively p < 0.01 and p <0.001), while mean ferritin did not change. Mean Hb, ferritin and TS% remained unchanged in group II after three months. Hb and TS% mean values rose significantly (3 months vs final, Hb 9.0 +/- 0.2 vs 9.9 +/- 0.2 g/dl, TS% 18.4 +/- 1.0 vs 27.0 +/- 1.0, respectively p < 0.005 and p <0.001), and ferritin markedly decreased from 450 +/- 50 to 206 +/- 24 microg/L (p < 0.001) at the end of the study. The rHuEpo dose was kept unchanged throughout the study. Differences were analyzed after three months. Mean Hb rose (0.8 +/- 0.2 g/dL) in group I but dropped (-0.1 +/- 0.1 g/dL) (p< 0.009) in group II. Ferritin dropped in both groups (group I vs group II, -173 + /-48 vs - 33 +/- 21 microg/L) (p < 0.01) while TS% increased (group I vs group II, 8.2 +/- 1.5 vs 0.4 +/- 0.7) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IVAA may partially correct FID and consequently help rHuEpo hyporesponsive anemia.     

A prospective crossover trial comparing intermittent intravenous and continuous oral iron supplements in peritoneal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant iron supplementation is required in the great majority of erythropoietin (Epo)-treated patients with end-stage renal failure. Intravenous (i.v.) iron supplementation has been demonstrated to be superior to oral iron therapy in Epo-treated haemodialysis patients, but comparative data in iron-replete peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are lacking. METHODS: A 12-month, prospective, crossover trial comparing oral and i.v. iron supplementation was conducted in all Princess Alexandra Hospital PD patients who were on a stable dose of Epo, had no identifiable cause of impaired haemopoiesis other than uraemia, and had normal iron stores (transferrin saturation >20% and serum ferritin 100-500 mg/l). Patients received daily oral iron supplements (210 mg elemental iron per day) for 4 months followed by intermittent, outpatient i.v. iron infusions (200 mg every 2 months) for 4 months, followed by a further 4 months of oral iron. Haemoglobin levels and body iron stores were measured monthly. RESULTS: Twenty-eight individuals were entered into the study and 16 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. Using repeated-measures analysis of variance, haemoglobin concentrations increased significantly during the i.v. phase (108+/-3 to 114+/-3 g/l) compared with each of the oral phases (109+/-3 to 108+/-3 g/l and 114+/-3 to 107+/-4 g/l, P<0.05). Similar patterns were seen for both percentage transferrin saturation (23.8+/-2.3 to 30.8+/-3.0%, 24.8+/-2.1 to 23.8+/-2.3%, and 30.8+/-3.0 to 26.8+/-2.1%, respectively, P<0.05) and ferritin (385+/-47 to 544+/-103 mg/l, 317+/-46 to 385+/-47 mg/l, 544+/-103 to 463+/-50 mg/l, respectively, P=0.10). No significant changes in Epo dosages were observed throughout the study. I.v. iron supplementation was associated with a much lower incidence of gastrointestinal disturbances (11 vs 46%, P<0.05), but exceeded the cost of oral iron treatment by 6.5-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Two-monthly i.v. iron infusions represent a practical alternative to oral iron and can be safely administered to PD patients in an outpatient setting. Compared with daily oral therapy, 2-monthly i.v. iron supplementation in PD patients was better tolerated and resulted in superior haemoglobin levels and body iron stores.     

Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency in chronic dialysis patients

Tests have become available that not only give an index of iron stores and availability but also provide an integrated assessment of the efficacy of its utilization. This has allowed the revision of previously accepted criteria of iron deficiency as well as the most appropriate strategies for iron administration. By optimizing the response to erythropoietin, target haemoglobin levels may be reached with smaller doses, resulting in substantial savings.     

Therapy of iron deficiency anemia in patients on maintenance dialysis.

A controlled, prospective study compared the effectiveness of oral ferrous sulfate to intravenous iron dextran, each with and without concurrent intramuscular androgen for therapy of iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic renal failure treated with maintenance hemodialysis. During the 12-week period of therapy, the patients who received oral ferrous sulfate and androgens showed an increment in their mean hematocrit of 16.3% and those who received oral ferrous sulfate alone had an increase of 8.3%. Patients treated with intravenous iron dextran androgens showed an increment in their mean hematocrit of 9.4% and those given iron dextran alone showed an increase of 3.5%. Serum ferritin levels increased with iron repletion but correlated inversely with the erythropoietic response. The serum ferritin assay provides a simple and reliable method to demonstrate iron repletion, and oral ferrous sulfate is the preferred method of iron repletion in compliant patients.     

The association between iron deficiency and outcomes: a secondary analysis of the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial

In the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial, the use of intravenous iron did not reduce the need for blood transfusion or reduce patient complications or length of hospital stay. As part of the trial protocol, serum was collected at randomisation and on the day of surgery. These samples were analysed in a central laboratory for markers of iron deficiency. We performed a secondary analysis to explore the potential interactions between pre-operative markers of iron deficiency and intervention status on the trial outcome measures. Absolute iron deficiency was defined as ferritin <30 μg.l⁻¹; functional iron deficiency as ferritin 30–100 μg.l⁻¹ or transferrin saturation < 20%; and the remainder as non-iron deficient. Interactions were estimated using generalised linear models that included different subgroup indicators of baseline iron status. Co-primary endpoints were blood transfusion or death and number of blood transfusions, from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included peri-operative change in haemoglobin, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Most patients had iron deficiency (369/452 [82%]) at randomisation; one-third had absolute iron deficiency (144/452 [32%]) and half had functional iron deficiency (225/452 [50%]). The change in pre-operative haemoglobin with intravenous iron compared with placebo was greatest in patients with absolute iron deficiency, mean difference 8.9 g.l⁻¹, 95%CI 5.3–12.5; moderate in functional iron deficiency, mean difference 2.8 g.l⁻¹, 95%CI −0.1 to 5.7; and with little change seen in those patients who were non-iron deficient. Subgroup analyses did not suggest that intravenous iron compared with placebo reduced the likelihood of death or blood transfusion at 30 days differentially across subgroups according to baseline ferritin (p = 0.33 for interaction), transferrin saturation (p = 0.13) or in combination (p = 0.45), or for the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.06, 0.29, and 0.39, respectively). There was no beneficial effect of the use of intravenous iron compared with placebo, regardless of the metrics to diagnose iron deficiency, on postoperative complications or length of hospital stay.     

Effect of intravenous iron sucrose on oxidative stress in peritoneal dialysis patients

AIM: Intravenous iron therapy is an accepted treatment for patients receiving hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Studies have found enhanced oxidative stress in hemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron, but there are no clinical data for CAPD patients. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of 100 mg of intravenous iron-sucrose on the erythrocyte (RBC) antioxidant enzymes (namely, superoxide dismutase [SOD], catalase [CAT], and glutathione peroxidase [GSHPx]) and plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), an oxidant molecule, in CAPD patients. METHODS: Twelve CAPD patients receiving maintenance intravenous iron-sucrose were recruited. After a 12-hour fast, blood samples were taken for hemoglobin, iron, ferritin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and for baseline activities of erythrocyte antioxidant enzymes (i.e., SOD, CAT, GSHPx) and the plasma oxidant molecule, MDA. 100 mg iron-sucrose was infused over 30 minutes. Blood samples taken during (i.e., 15 minutes after commencement of infusion) and after (i.e., at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 6 hours after commencement) the infusion were taken for measurement of plasma iron, ferritin, TSAT, RBC SOD, CAT, GSHPx, and plasma MDA. RESULTS: Plasma iron and transferrin saturation elevated significantly during infusion (p < 0.05). There was no significant change in erythrocyte SOD, CAT, GSHPx, or in MDA activities. There was a reduction of GSHPx activity at the 30th minute (from 153.69 +/- 66.69 to 123.68 +/- 25.50 mU/mL), but it was not statistically significant. The patients were grouped according to baseline ferritin (100-400 and 400-800 ng/mL); 60th-minute MDA was significantly higher in the latter group (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between hsCRP and oxidant-antioxidant balance. No correlation was noted between RBC antioxidant enzymes or plasma oxidant molecule and ferritin levels. CONCLUSION: There are no acute deteriorating effects from a 100 mg of intravenous iron-sucrose in CAPD patients with optimal iron stores. This dose may be applied safely in CAPD patients.     

The therapeutic equivalence of oral and intravenous iron in renal dialysis patients.

Oral and intravenous iron were compared in patients treated with renal dialysis by a cross-over trial. Intravenous iron was given over 2 weeks as an iron dextran (equivalent to 100 mg elemental iron). Oral iron was given daily as ferrous sulphate (equivalent to 100 mg elemental iron) in a wax matrix tablet. Each treatment period lasted 26 weeks. There was no significant difference in therapeutic or unwanted effects between the treatments.     

Rubidium deficiency in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Since dialysis has brought long-term survival to uremic patients, we can now speculate on more subtle problems derived from imbalance or sub-optimal regulation of some elements such as trace metals. We focused on the rubidium (Rb) status in dialysis patients (HD), as concerns about its possible deficiency have been raised. METHODS: Rb in uremic patients was evaluated by: A) serum concentration (graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy) from blood samples of 70 patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) in comparison with 75 controls; B) tissue concentration (neutron activation analysis) from autopsy or biopsy samples (20) of HD patients in comparison with 21 controls; C) in vivo intradialytic mass balance during standard bicarbonate dialysis in 8 HD patients. RESULTS: A) Serum Rb concentrations in HD patients significantly were lower than in normal controls (304 +/- 81 micrograms/L versus 350 +/- 74 micrograms/L p < 0.001, log-transformed 5.68 +/- 0.28 versus 5.84 +/- 0.20, p < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis found a significantly higher risk of serum Rb < 250-300 and 350 micrograms/L in uremic patients than in controls (Odd ratios or 12.6, 95% CI 2.77-57.04; 4.0, 95% CI 1.92-8.4; 2.08, 95% CI 1.02-4.25, respectively). B) Rb was significantly lower in tissues of HD patients, including brain (2250 +/- 1520 ng/g versus 5490 +/- 1250 ng/g, p = 0.0002) than normal controls. C) Rb was transferred from the patients' blood to the dialysis bath during a standard bicarbonate dialysis session, giving mean intradialytic Rb removal of 4.0 +/- 1.1 mg/session. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that Rb deficiency may arise in uremic patients, and indicate that diffusive dialysis treatments allow Rb removal which, however, with a standard bicarbonate schedule does not seem to be any greater than that expected with normal urine output (20 mg/week). Further studies are needed to clarify the roles of many factors in this Rb deficiency, including the effects of uremia by itself, pre-dialysis factors (diet, impaired renal function and drugs), dialysis procedures (frequency, hours, diffusive/convective components) or other biochemical/clinical parameters (hemoglobin, body mass index, age). The finding of a Rb deficiency in uremia is important as it has a role in neurobehavioural functions, mainly as an antidepressant. As Rb deficiency may be implicated in central nervous system alterations which strongly influence the quality of life, we believe that monitoring serum Rb in uremic patients and clarifying the causal mechanisms of deficiency will facilitate future therapeutic approaches.     

A randomized trial of iron deficiency testing strategies in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of iron deficiency in hemodialysis patients is limited by the inaccuracy of commonly used tests. Reticulocyte hemoglobin content (CHr) is a test that has shown promise for improved diagnosis in preliminary studies. The purpose of this study was to compare iron management guided by serum ferritin and transferrin saturation to management guided by CHr. METHODS: A total of 157 hemodialysis patients from three centers were randomized to iron management based on (group 1) serum ferritin and transferrin saturation, or (group 2) CHr. Patients were followed for six months. Treatment with intravenous iron dextran, 100 mg for 10 consecutive treatments was initiated if (group 1) serum ferritin <100 ng/mL or transferrin saturation <20%, or (group 2) CHr <29 pg. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in the final mean hematocrit or epoetin dose. The mean weekly dose of iron dextran was 47.7 +/- 35.5 mg in group 1 compared to 22.9 +/- 20.5 mg in group 2 (P = 0.02). The final mean serum ferritin was 399.5 +/- 247.6 ng/mL in group 1 compared to 304.7 +/- 290.6 ng/mL in group 2 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in final TSAT or CHr. Coefficient of variation was significantly lower for CHr than serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (3.4% vs. 43.6% and 39.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CHr is a markedly more stable analyte than serum ferritin or transferrin saturation, and iron management based on CHr results in similar hematocrit and epoetin dosing while significantly reducing IV iron exposure.     

Content of reticulocyte hemoglobin is a reliable tool for determining iron deficiency in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of iron status in dialysis patients provides information essential to the planning of adequate recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment. Iron status of the patients can be determined from the recently available measurement of content of reticulocyte hemoglobin (CHr). METHODS: In this study, to clarify the accuracy of CHr in diagnosing iron deficiency in hemodialysis (HD) patients, we initially compared CHr with such conventional iron parameters as serum ferritin levels, transferrin saturation and serum soluble transferrin receptor levels. Secondly, we investigated the changes in CHr during iron supplementation for iron-deficient patients to determine whether this marker is a prospective and reliable indicator of iron sufficiency. The participants in this study were 149 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 53 age-matched healthy subjects. Iron deficiency was defined as having a TSAT of less than 20% and serum ferritin of less than 100 ng/ml. Conventional parameters of red blood cells and CHr were measured by an ADVIA120 autoanalyzer. RESULTS: Mean CHr was 32.3 +/- 2.2 pg in the patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. CHr significantly correlated with iron parameters in the dialysis patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between CHr and each outcome measure, and CHr was the significant multivariate predictor of iron deficiency. Iron supplements given to the patients with low CHr and hematocrit (Hct) significantly increased Hct, resulting in a decrease in the weekly dosage of rHuEPO. CONCLUSIONS: CHr, measured simultaneously with Hct, is a sensitive and specific marker of iron status in dialysis patients.     

Efficacy and safety of a low monthly dose of intravenous iron sucrose in peritoneal dialysis patients

Purpose

Scientific data regarding intravenous iron supplementation in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are scarce. In attempting to administer the minimum monthly IV iron dose that could improve erythropoiesis, we wanted to assess the safety and efficacy of monthly maintenance intravenous administration of 100 mg iron sucrose in PD patients.

Methods

In a 9-month prospective study, all clinically stable PD patients received intravenously 200 mg of iron sucrose as a loading dose, followed by monthly doses of 100 mg for five consecutive months. Levels of hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), reticulocyte hemoglobin content (CHr) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured before each administration and 3 months after the last iron infusion. Also, doses of concurrent erythropoietin administration were recorded.

Results

Eighteen patients were eligible for the study. Mean levels of Hb and ferritin increased significantly (from 10.0 to 10.9 mg/dL, p?=?0.01 and from 143 to 260 ng/mL, p?=?0.005), as well as the increase in TSAT levels approached borderline significance (from 26.2 to 33.1%, p?=?0.07). During the 6 months of iron administration, the erythropoietin dose was reduced in five patients and discontinued in one. During the 3 months following the last iron infusion, three of them again raised the erythropoietin dose to previous levels. None of the patients experienced any side effects related to IV iron administration.

Conclusions

A monthly maintenance intravenous dose of 100 mg iron sucrose may be a practical, effective, and safe in the short term, treatment of anemia in PD patients resulting in improved hemoglobin levels, iron indices, and erythropoietin response.

     

A randomized trial of three iron dextran infusion methods for anemia in EPO-treated dialysis patients

Forty-three hemodialysis patients receiving recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoietin alpha) were randomized to receive intravenous iron dextran as a total-dose infusion, 500-mg infusion to total dose, or 100-mg bolus to total dose, in each case during the dialysis procedure. The dose of iron dextran was calculated from the patient's existing hemoglobin to achieve a desired hemoglobin. Patients were eligible to receive intravenous iron dextran if they had a serum ferritin of < or = 100 ng/mL or a serum ferritin of 100 to 200 ng/mL, along with a transferrin saturation of < or = 19%. Patients were excluded if they had prior therapy with iron dextran, aluminum intoxication, or transfusion during the study. The time to the maximum hemoglobin, acute adverse reactions, and delayed adverse reactions were analyzed statistically, and no differences were seen in any of the three groups. Total-dose intravenous iron dextran infusion is safe, convenient, less expensive, and as efficacious as divided-dose infusions.     

Willingness of dialysis patients to participate in a randomized controlled trial of daily dialysis

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has proposed conducting randomized controlled trials comparing short, daily, in-center hemodialysis with conventional hemodialysis. However, there is concern that difficulties recruiting patients may prevent the successful completion of such trials if patients believe the inconveniences of daily dialysis outweigh any potential health benefits. METHODS: To gauge willingness to participate in a daily dialysis trial, we described a hypothetical, randomized controlled trial comparing conventional to daily hemodialysis to 209 chronic hemodialysis patients, and assessed their motivations for and concerns about participating. RESULTS: We found that 85 patients (41%) of 209 patients who agreed to be interviewed expressed some willingness to participate in the hypothetical trial. Patients who expressed greater willingness to participate were younger (OR for participating = 0.96 per year, 95% CI = 0.94 to 0.98, P= 0.001), less likely to smoke (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.84, P= 0.017), more likely to have been hospitalized during the last 12 months (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.5 to 5.5, P= 0.002), less likely to have reactive airway disease (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.69, P= 0.01) or coronary artery disease (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.53, P= 0.001), and less likely to be on the waiting list for a kidney transplant (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.50, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that less than half of eligible patients would be willing to participate in the randomized controlled trial. Differing willingness to participate across patient subgroups suggests that certain subgroups (i.e., older patients and those with coronary artery disease) will need to be targeted to ensure that results are generalizable to most hemodialysis patients.