Survey of Iowa general dentists regarding the age 1 dental visit

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess Iowa general dentists regarding the age 1 dental visit. METHODS: A 15-item survey was mailed to 1,521 licensed dentists to address their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding the age 1 dental visit. Chi-square statistics and logistic regression models were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifteen (47%) useable surveys were returned from 2 mailings. Five hundred forty (76%) general dentists were familiar with the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) age 1 dental visit recommendation. Most reported obtaining this information through continuing education (37%). Eleven percent believed the first dental visit should occur between 0 and 11 months of age, and 66% reported seeing children younger than 2. "Prefer to refer infants to a pediatric dentist" (20%) was the most common reason for not seeing children 0 to 23 months old. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that dentists who believed children should have their first dental visit at 0 to 23 months and those willing to see children at age 0 to 23 months were younger, more recent graduates, more likely to be female, aware of the AAPD recommendations, and were already seeing children 0 to 23 months. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Iowa general dentists are aware of the AAPD age 1 dental visit recommendation.     

Practices and opinions of Connecticut general dentists regarding dental treatment during pregnancy

This study aimed to evaluate the opinions and practices of general dentists in Connecticut regarding dental care during pregnancy. A survey was mailed to Connecticut general dentists to acquire data regarding age, gender, training, type of practice, years in practice, payment types accepted, procedures provided for pregnant women according to trimester, provider comfort level with treating pregnant patients, reasons for not treating pregnant patients, and provider opinions about dental care during pregnancy. The response rate was 42%, yielding a sample of 116 dentists. The majority of respondents (97%) reported treating pregnant patients; however, only 45% felt "very comfortable" treating these patients. All dentists in the sample agreed that physicians need to include an oral health evaluation and appropriate referral for patients' prenatal care. However, 70% of respondents had never received a dental referral for a pregnant patient. The majority of dentists favored providing dental treatment during the second trimester of pregnancy. Most dentists (77%) would take a radiograph for a patient 10 weeks into the pregnancy seeking treatment for dental pain, but only 2% would take routine radiographs regardless of the pregnancy trimester. There was a lack of consensus about medications dentists reported acceptable to prescribe for pregnant patients, and female dentists were significantly less likely than males to prescribe ibuprofen (P < 0.05). At least half of the respondents reported not being completely comfortable treating pregnant patients. Further, many dentists appear to not follow medication prescribing guidelines for this population. While additional research is needed, these initial results indicate that additional education regarding the treatment of pregnant patients would be a beneficial addition to dental school and continued education course curricula.     

Survey of dental prophylaxes rendered by pediatric dentists in New England

BACKGROUND: The objective of this anonymous postal survey was to assess the provision of dental prophylaxis by pediatric dentists in New England. METHODS: The questionnaire survey was sent by first class mail in September, 2001 to all 217 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) members in active private practice in the six New England States of Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. A self-addressed, stamped envelope was provided to facilitate the returned response. RESULTS: The survey had a response rate of 70%. Most practitioners (93%) routinely recommended dental prophylaxis for their recall patients. The proportion of practitioners who considered the following indications for recommending dental prophylaxis was: plaque, stain, and/or calculus removal - 99%; caries prevention - 75%; prior to topical fluoride application - 82%; prior to sealant application - 58%; and for behavioral modification - 68%. Almost two thirds of the practitioners (62%) defined dental prophylaxis as referring to both rubber cup pumice prophylaxis as well as to toothbrush prophylaxis. However, only one in four practitioners (26%) had modified her/his clinical practice to substitute toothbrush prophylaxis in lieu of rubber cup pumice prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Pediatric dentists in New England routinely provide dental prophylaxis to their recall patients.     

Rural versus urban analysis of dental procedures provided to Virginia Medicaid recipients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the distribution of procedures provided to Virginia Medicaid children by 3 types of dental providers in rural and urban areas. METHODS: Medicaid claims filed for dental patients less than 21 years old were obtained and analyzed for fiscal years 1994-1995. Dental providers were categorized according to their practice type: (1) general practice (GP); (2) pediatric (PD); and (3) public health (PH) dentists. Each type of practice was categorized as practicing in a metropolitan, urban, rural, or completely rural location and evaluated for percentages of preventive, diagnostic, and corrective services provided. RESULTS: Rural areas had a higher percentage of significant providers than did metropolitan or urban areas. General dentists performed more diagnostic and preventive but fewer corrective procedures than pediatric dentists. Pediatric dentists and general dentists in completely rural areas performed more corrective procedures than their counterparts in metropolitan or urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: General, pediatric, and public health dentists in metropolitan and urban areas perform slightly more diagnostic services and fewer corrective services than practitioners in more rural areas.     

A survey of primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in US dental schools and practiced by diplomates of the American Board Of Pediatric Dentistry

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to repeat a 1997 survey of current pulp therapy practice. METHODS: The directors of dental school predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs (N=56) and board certified pediatric dentists (N=1200) were surveyed in 2005. RESULTS: More dental schools (83%) taught indirect pulp therapy (IPT) compared to 1997. Significantly more used glass ionomer for IPT with most dental schools and diplomates not re-entering a tooth after IPT. Over 30% of schools and diplomates do direct pulp cops using glass ionomer. For pulpotomy, diluted formocresol usage decreased in dental schools (54%) while ferric sulfate significantly increased (24%) and full strength remained at 22%. Shorter placement of pulpotomy medication was noted and ZOE alone the preferred base. Pulpectomy was advocated by 85% of 2005 schools and diplomates with ZOE filler use decreasing while iodoform/calcium hydroxide filler use increasing. CONCLUSIONS: More pediatric dentists are using glass ionomer for IPT and direct pulp capping, and there was a trend away from the use of 1:5 diluted formocresol with more using ferric sulfate for pulpotomy. For pulpectomy, most use ZOE but iodoform pastes and calcium hydroxide have increased in usage since 1997 Disagreements continue concerning when to use certain pulp therapies and some directors and diplomates did not follow the AAPD guidelines.     

Challenges of managing child behavior in the 21st century dental setting

This paper discussed factors influencing behavior management of the child dental patient. Pediatric dentists are affected by changes in: (1) society; (2) marketing and media; (3) communications and technology; and (4) parenting practices. Behavior of pediatric patients reflects fewer boundaries, less discipline and self-control, and lowered behavioral expectations by parents and contemporary culture. The insurance industry, regulatory bodies, legal system, dental staff, and pediatric dentist education are other influences on behavior management. Responses of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD), which could support the pediatric dentist in the changing environment, include: (1) research; (2) continuing education for staff and dentists; (3) development of Internet accessible materials for the public; (4) legislative activity; (5) partnering with pediatric medicine to develop new behavior management strategies; (6) establishment of an AAPD Council on Child Behavior; and (7) ongoing critical reassessment of behavior issues by the AAPD.     

Internet usage by pediatric dental practices in Connecticut

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine Internet usage by pediatric dental practices in Connecticut. METHODS: A seven-item anonymous survey was mailed to all the 64 pediatric dentists in private practice in Connecticut. Each survey form was mailed along with a stamped and pre-addressed return envelope. Frequency distribution analyses and chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: The survey had a response rate of 73%. More than three-fourths of the pediatric dental practices were connected to the Internet. Seventy-two percent of the practices submitted third-party claims electronically. Almost all of the respondents did not use email to communicate with patients or to discuss individual patient issues with other health care providers. Only two-fifths of the practices had a World Wide Web site. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the pediatric dental practices in Connecticut were connected to the Internet. Electronic third-party claims submission was the predominant Internet service used by these practices.     

Method of payment for children's dental services by practice type and geographic location.

The purpose of this project was to evaluate practice type and geographical differences in methods of payment accepted for children's dental services. A survey was mailed to 2000 general dentists and 1000 pediatric dentists randomly selected to provide representation from the 50 United States. Dentists were asked to specify the type of practice and the state in which they primarily practice. The survey included Medicaid, dental insurance, preferred provider organizations (PPO), and self-payment as payment options. Dentists were asked to indicate whether they never, occasionally, or frequently accepted each option of payment for children's dental services. Responses were received from 1245 (42%) dentists, including 723 general dentists and 522 pediatric dentists. Chi-square statistical analysis revealed significant practice type and regional differences in the acceptance of Medicaid for payment. Pediatric dentists accept Medicaid more frequently than general dentists (P < 0.001). Most dentists accept dental insurance and self-payment, while few indicate involvement with a PPO. The study revealed significant practice type differences only in the acceptance of Medicaid as payment for children's dental services. On a geographic basis, there were significant differences in the acceptance of Medicaid and dental insurance.     

对国际儿童口腔行为诱导指南的理解和借鉴

 理解和借鉴美国儿童牙科学会制定的儿童口腔行为诱导指南，采用科学的方法评价指南的质量，分析总结指南建议的共识，为儿童行为管理的临床实践提供循证依据，对国内的儿童口腔临床实践有重要的意义。文章介绍该指南，希望更好地为临床工作的开展进行指导。     

Behavior management conference panel IV report--Educational issues

Panel IV convened to address whether and how dental education curricula on behavior management needs to adapt to the changing needs and expectations of families and patients. There was a general consensus that behavior management should have a greater focus in dental education. Predoctoral and postdoctoral students may be expected to have different levels of exposure to behavior management concepts and techniques, but communications training should be a greater emphasis throughout dental education. Panel members specifically addressed behavior management techniques, including immobilization, restraint, sedation, and general anesthesia. Major recommendations from the panel included: 1) promote more research in behavior management; 2) update the AAPD guidelines on behavior management; 3) develop competencies/proficiencies for training programs and defining standardized outcomes; 4) introduce an AAPD task force to examine sedation issues that pertain to pediatric dental education; 5) explore new teaching methods of behavior management strategies and techniques; 6) develop a public awareness campaign to educate the public regarding what pediatric dentists do best.     

Indiana infant-toddler dental care survey.

The purpose of this project was to survey Indiana dentists concerning dental care for Indiana infants and toddlers. Dental care issues covered were the age for a child's first dental visit, frequency of rampant or nursing caries cases examined, and dental referral sources for infants and toddlers. The survey also helped determine the dentist's perception of parents' attitudes toward services recommended by the dentist. A twelve question survey was mailed to 2006 general and pediatric dentists in the State of Indiana. The results of the survey were: 1. A large percentage of Indiana dental practitioners do not recommend the first dental visit or examine children for their dental visit until the child is more than one year of age. 2. A majority of Indiana dental practitioners see children with nursing caries or rampant caries on a monthly basis. 3. The majority of Indiana dental practitioners refer children with nursing caries to pediatric dentists for treatment. 4. Although the full treatment plan may undergo some modification based on various parental concerns, a majority of practitioners do not experience difficulty in obtaining treatment plan acceptance for nursing or rampant caries cases.     

Infant oral health care: a survey of general dentists, pediatric dentists, and pediatricians in Virginia

PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to examine the current knowledge, attitudes, and experiences related to infant oral health for dental and medical providers in Virginia. METHODS: A survey of infant oral health care was sent to: (a) 300 randomly selected general dentists; (b) 300 randomly selected pediatricians; and (c) all pediatric dentists in Virginia. Survey respondents were tabulated, and percent frequency distributions for responses to each item were computed. RESULTS: The surveys return rate was 48%. A total of 100% of pediatric dentists treated infants and were more likely to recommend that children be seen by age 1 (P < .001). All pediatricians treated infants as well, while only 5% referred for the first dental visit by 1 year of age. Forty-five percent of general dentists surveyed treated infants, and only 12% referred for the first dental visit by 1 year of age. The logistic regression results indicated that there were differences between practitioner type regarding the recommended age of the first dental visit and years in practice. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatricians and general dentists are not advising patients to see the dentist by 1 year of age. There is a need for increased infant oral health care education in the medical and dental communities.     

Ohio dental care providers' treatment of young children, 2002

BACKGROUND: Adequate access to dental care for young children--particularly those from low-income families--is a public concern. The authors conducted a survey of Ohio dental care providers to examine factors influencing their willingness to care for these children. METHODS: Random samples of Ohio general practitioner (GPs) dentists and pediatric dentists (PDs) and all Ohio safety-net dental clinics completed a mail survey regarding treatment of children aged 0 through 5 years. The authors categorized responses by provider type and further analyzed GPs' responses by years since graduation and geographic character. RESULTS: Few Ohio GPs (8 percent) recommended a first dental visit by 1 year of age. While 91 percent of GPs treated children aged 3 through 5 years, only 34 percent treated children aged 0 through 2 years, most often for emergency visits or examinations. Only 7 percent of all GPs and 29 percent of PDs accepted patients enrolled in Medicaid without limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Children's being young (0-2 years of age) and having Medicaid as a payment source made GPs substantially less likely to treat them. Children's being enrolled in Head Start made GPs somewhat more likely to treat them. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: New strategies for ensuring dental care access for young children from low-income families are necessary. Such strategies may take the form of interpeer advocacy, education, practice incentives or creation of coordinated GP and PD teams.     

Service mix in general dental practices employing and not employing dental hygienists

Abstract Service mix studies conducted in Australia have indicated a low provision of periodontal services. The service mix in Australian general dental practices employing dental hygienists has not been studied. This study compares the service mix between 18 practices employing hygienists and 29 practices not employing hygienists in Adelaide. Practices employing hygienists tended to be larger group practices, with younger dentists seeing a younger set of patients. Practices employing dental hygienists provided a mean of 97.9 services to 57.2 patients over 2 days, significantly higher than the mean of 68.8 procedures to 39.1 patients in practices not employing dental hygienists. Comparing the % of procedures provided in treatment categories as a ratio of total procedures, practices employing dental hygienists provided significantly more periodontal procedures and less oral surgery, prosthetic and restorative procedures. Periodontally-related services accounted for an average of 37.7% of procedures in practices employing dental hygienists compared with 18.9% in practices not employing dental hygienists (p(0.05). Periodontal and preventive treatment of 50.7%) of patients in practices employing hygienists was delegated to a hygienist, and the level of delegation of periodontally-related procedures was 77.2%. Over 90% of procedures performed by hygienists were periodontally-related, with the removal of subgingival calculus accounting for 57.7% of all procedures provided by dental hygienists. In conclusion, practices employing hygienists had a more periodontally-orientated service mix, with hygienists acting to complement the services of dentists in the provision of periodontal services, rather than as a substitute for the dentist.     

Antibiotic use for treating dental infections in children: a survey of dentists' prescribing practices

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to examine the antibiotic prescribing practices of general and pediatric dentists in the management of odontogenic infections in children.MethodsThe authors relied on a cross-sectional study design to assess the antibiotic prescribing practices of general and pediatric dentists in North Carolina. The survey instrument consisted of five clinical case scenarios that included antibiotic-prescribing decisions in a self-administered questionnaire format. The participants were volunteers attending one of four continuing education courses. The authors invited all pediatric dentists in private practice to participate in the study, as well as general practitioners who treated children in general practice. The authors compared the practitioners&;apos; responses for each clinical case scenario with the prescribing guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry and the American Dental Association.ResultsA total of 154 surveys were completed and returned (55 percent response rate). The mean age of respondents was 47 years, and the mean number of years in practice was 19. Of the 154 overall, 106 (69 percent) were general practitioners and 48 (31 percent) were pediatric dentists. Across the three in-office clinical case scenarios, adherence to professional prescribing guidelines ranged from 10 to 42 percent. For the two weekend scenarios, overall adherence to the professional prescribing guidelines dropped to 14 and 17 percent. Dentists who had completed postgraduate education (n = 73 [51 percent]) were more likely (P < .05) to have adhered to published guidelines in prescribing antibiotics.ConclusionsThe results of this survey show that dentists&;apos; adherence to professional guidelines for prescribing antibiotics for odontogenic infections in children was low. There appears to be a lack of concordance between recommended professional guidelines and the antibiotic prescribing practices of dentists. Clearer, more specific guidelines may lead to improved adherence among dentists.     

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis--a study of knowledge and application of guidelines among dentists and cardiologists

Antibiotic prophylaxis and infective endocarditis is a controversial topic. The compliance with available guidelines among dentists is poor. The dental health education of patients by their cardiologists is inadequate. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the knowledge and application of available guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective endocarditis among general dental practitioners and cardiologists. DESIGN: Structured postal questionnaire SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A list of 515 dentists was obtained from a register held by the Postgraduate Medical and Dental Board. A list of 85 cardiologists was obtained from a national register held by the Cardiothoracic Society of Ireland. RESULTS: A 31% response rate was obtained from the cardiologists and 37% from the dentists. The majority of the cardiologists (84%) were in hospital practice and 64% of dentists were in private general practice. Cardiologists showed a preference for the AHA guidelines (50%) and more dentists use the BSAC guidelines (56%). The cardiologists were very familiar with the cardiac conditions that pose a risk for dental patients but weak at educating their patients on the importance of good dental health. The dentists were good at identifying procedures that could place their patients at risk but less informed about which cardiac conditions warranted prophylaxis. Decision-making among the dentists with regard to choice of prophylaxis and appropriate treatment intervals was poor. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge of and compliance with the available guidelines is poor. Dental health education of at-risk patients by their cardiologists and dentists is inadequate. Further regular education of patients, dentists and medical practitioners is required.     

Patients with special health care needs in general and pediatric dental practices in Ontario

The objective of this study was to determine the involvement of Ontario's general and pediatric dentists in providing care to patients with special health care needs (PSHCNs). A questionnaire was developed and sent to a randomly selected sample of general dentists and to all pediatric dentists in Ontario; response rates were 52% and 90%, respectively. Most general dentists and all pediatric dentists reported that they provided a full range of dental services to PSHCNs. Most (80%) general dentists treat PSHCNs of all ages, whereas 60% of pediatric dentists report only treating PSHCNs up to the age of 18 years. A majority of both groups report treating PSHCNs whose dental care is paid through various government-funded programs. Most general dentists received training in the treatment of PSHCNs in undergraduate dental school, and 40% reported taking continuing education courses in this area. Most pediatric dentists received this training during their advanced dental specialty training, and 29% reported taking continuing education courses in this area. The results of this survey appear to demonstrate that general and pediatric dentists in Ontario provide a full range of dental services to PSHCNs, treat patients with a variety of disabilities and of all ages and are interested in pursuing continuing education that focuses on the delivery of dental care to PSHCNs. However, the results may be inaccurate because of question design flaws and responder bias among the 52% of surveyed general dentists who returned their questionnaires.     

Effectiveness of local anesthesia in pediatric dental practice

BACKGROUND: Pain control in dental treatment for children is very important. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of local anesthetic use by pediatric dentists and to examine factors related to its effectiveness in children. METHODS: The authors observed 361 patients in 17 pediatric dental practices in Washington state while each child received restorative or surgical dental treatment. The authors recorded data concerning local anesthetic use and effectiveness. The children's mean age was 87 months, and 181 (50.1 percent) of the patients were girls. A pediatric dentist observer rated each child's anxiety before the initial injection of local anesthetic and the effectiveness of pain control during restorative treatment. The observing dentist asked the treating dentist about the effectiveness of pain control after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Forty-two of 361 children (11.6 percent) were observed to experience ineffective pain control. Fourteen of 17 dentists (82.4 percent) were observed to have at least one patient in whom pain control was ineffective. Lidocaine (2 percent with 1:100,000 epinephrine) was used by 15 of 17 dentists (88.2 percent) and in 312 of 361 cases (86.4 percent). The average amount of agent was one cartridge (36 milligrams of lidocaine). Children who were anxious, who had symptoms before treatment, and who underwent more invasive operative and endodontic procedures were more likely to experience ineffective pain control. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that painful treatment is relatively frequent even in specialized pediatric practice. Variability in general practice is likely to be greater. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The incidence of ineffective pain control may be less if clinicians use methods to reduce anxiety and perioperative infection and symptoms.