Cystatin C is a more sensitive marker than creatinine for the estimation of GFR in type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best overall index of renal function in health and disease. Inulin and 51Cr-EDTA plasma clearances are considered the gold standard methods for estimating GFR. Unfortunately, these methods require specialized technical personnel over a period of several hours and high costs. In clinical practice, serum creatinine is the most widely used index for the noninvasive assessment of GFR. Despite its specificity, serum creatinine demonstrates an inadequate sensitivity, particularly in the early stages of renal impairment. Recently, cystatin C, a low molecular mass plasma protein freely filtered through the glomerulus and almost completely reabsorbed and catabolized by tubular cells, has been proposed as a new and very sensitive serum marker of changes in GFR. This study was designed to test whether serum cystatin C can replace serum creatinine for the early assessment of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study was performed on 52 Caucasian type 2 diabetic patients. Patients with an abnormal albumin excretion rate (AER) were carefully examined to rule out non-diabetic renal diseases by ultrasonography, urine bacteriology, microscopic urine analysis, and kidney biopsy. Serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, AER, serum lipids, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured. GFR was estimated by the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA. In addition the Cockcroft and Gault formula (Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR) was calculated. RESULTS: Cystatin C serum concentration progressively increased as GFR decreased. The overall relationship between the reciprocal cystatin C and GFR was significantly stronger (r = 0.84) than those between serum creatinine and GFR (r = 0.65) and between Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR and GFR (r = 0.70). As GFR decreased from 120 to 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, cystatin C increased more significantly that serum creatinine, giving a stronger signal in comparison to that of creatinine over the range of the measured GFR. The maximum diagnostic accuracy of serum cystatin C (90%) was significantly better than those of serum creatinine (77%) and Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR (85%) in discriminating between type 2 diabetic patients with normal GFR (>80 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and those with reduced GFR (<80 mL/min/1.73 m2). In particular, the cystatin C cut-off limit of 0.93 mg/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 7.7% and to a false-negative rate of 1.9%; the serum creatinine cut-off limit of 87.5 micromol/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 5.8% and to a false-negative rate of 17.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C may be considered as an alternative and more accurate serum marker than serum creatinine or the Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR in discriminating type 2 diabetic patients with reduced GFR from those with normal GFR.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function.

BACKGROUND: Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, serum cystatin C was proposed as a new endogenous marker of GFR and in our study its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of other markers of GFR. METHODS: In this study, 164 patients with CKD stages 2-3 (GFR 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m2), who had performed 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid clearance, were enrolled. In each patient, serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were determined. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C&G) and the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formulas. RESULTS: The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 57 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine 149 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C 1.74 mg/l. We found significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum creatinine (R = -0.666), serum cystatin C (R = -0.792), reciprocal of serum creatinine (R = 0.628), reciprocal of serum cystatin C (R = 0.753) and calculated creatinine clearance from the formulas C&G (R = 0.515) and MDRD formulas (R = 0.716). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (cut-off for GFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) showed that serum cystatin C had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine (P = 0.04) and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula (P < 0.0001), though only in female patients. No difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance calculated from the MDRD formula. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that serum cystatin C is a reliable marker of GFR in patients with mildly to moderately impaired kidney function and has a higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula in female patients.     

Cystatin C as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in pediatric patients

Cystatin C is a non-glycated 13-kilodalton basic protein produced by all nucleated cells. The low molecular mass and the basic nature of cystatin C, in combination with its stable production rate, suggest that the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the major determinant of cystatin C concentration in the peripheral circulation. Recently published studies have shown that cystatin C correlates more strongly than creatinine with GFR measured using the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum cystatin C as a marker for GFR in children. GFR was determined on medical indications using the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA technique in pediatric patients (2–16 years) in our renal unit. Simultaneously their cystatin C and creatinine concentrations were also measured. Of our 52 patients, 19 had a reduced renal function (<GFR 89 ml/min per 1.73 m²) based on the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance. The correlation of cystatin C with the isotopic measurement of GFR tended to be stronger (r=0.89, P=0.073) than that of creatinine (r=0.80). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was better (P=0.037) than that of creatinine in discriminating between subjects with normal renal function and those with reduced GFR. This study demonstrates that serum cystatin C has an increased diagnostic accuracy for reduced GFR when compared with serum creatinine. Hence, cystatin C seems to be an attractive alternative for the estimation of GFR in children. Received: 13 May 1998 / Revised: 22 September 1998 / Accepted: 22 October 1998     

Cystatin C, an easy and reliable marker for assessment of renal dysfunction in children with liver disease and after liver transplantation.

Renal dysfunction of variable severity is being increasingly recognized as a major complication of calcineurin inhibitors (CI), in some patients even necessitating renal transplantation. Close and effective monitoring of the renal function is indicated. Current methods for this monitoring are calculation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on creatinine or exogenous substances like 51Cr-EDTA. The first method is unreliable in children and the second is expensive and cumbersome. Cystatin C has been shown to be an accurate marker of glomerular filtration but has not been evaluated in a large cohort of pediatric patients before and after liver transplantation (LT). We evaluated the accuracy of cystatin C in 62 children (30 male) with LT, who had their 51Cr-EDTA measured on 40 occasions prior to LT and on 47 occasions after LT. The reciprocal of cystatin C correlated better with 51Cr-EDTA GFR (r = .78) than the reciprocal of creatinine (r = .40). Diagnostic accuracy in the identification of reduced GFR was assessed by ROC analysis. Cystatin C yielded the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) in all groups assessed. From these data a cutoff level of cystatin C predicting 51Cr-EDTA GFR < 80 ml/min/1.73 m2 was calculated. A level of 1.06 mg/L was found to have a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 81%. Applying this cutoff level in our patient group would have avoided 51Cr-EDTA GFR estimation in 43 of the 87 estimations. In conclusion, the use of this simple test could be recommended as screening of renal dysfunction in children with liver disease and after LT.     

Estimation of renal function in diabetic nephropathy. Comparison of five methods

Plasma as well as renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA, serum creatinine, plasma beta-2-microglobulin and endogenous creatinine clearance were compared and evaluated in patients with diabetic nephropathy and in control patients with renal disease of other origin. The difference between the plasma clearance and the renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA, that is the extrarenal clearance, was found to be higher in diabetics than in control patients (7.0 vs. 3.5 ml/min; p less than 0.001). The serum creatinine correlated well with the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but in the individual case the GFR was not at all predictable from serum creatinine. The plasma beta-2-microglobulin did not correlate better than serum creatinine to 51Cr-EDTA clearance, and did not permit an earlier diagnosis of renal insufficiency. Endogenous creatinine clearance overestimated GFR by 0-180%. Due to residual urine, the coefficient of variation was higher in diabetic patients than in controls, but the effect of this imperfection was reduced by using multiple collection periods. In conclusion, the renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA was found to be preferable to the other methods.     

Estimating the glomerular filtration rate using serum cystatin C levels in patients with spinal cord injuries

Study design:Prospective cohort study.Objectives:To investigate the relationship between (51)chromium-ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetate ((51)Cr-EDTA) clearance, serum cystatin C (CysC), serum creatinine, creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR(MDRD), MDRD stands for modification of diet in renal disease) based on the serum creatinine in patients with complete or incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) and to develop and evaluate a GFR-estimating equation using serum CysC.Settings:Spinal Cord Injury Unit, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.Methods:Ninety-eight men and 47 women with SCI were included in the study. Serum CysC levels were measured by an automated particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay, serum and urine creatinine levels were measured by an enzymatic method traceable to the IDMS creatinine reference method, and (51)Cr-EDTA clearance was measured by a multiple plasma sample method.Results:The area under the curves (AUCs) in the non-parametric receiver operating characteristics (ROC) plots for serum CysC were compared with serum creatinine and to eGFR(MDRD) and revealed a significant difference (P-value<0.05) for all SCI patients. There was no significant difference between the AUC for serum CysC compared with the AUC for creatinine clearance. GFR (ml?min(-1) per 1.73?m(2)) can be calculated from serum CysC values (mg?l(-1)) using the equation eGFR(CysC)=212·exp(0.914·CysC). The model accurately predicted the GFR of 88% of patients within ±30% of the measured GFR, and it was able to predict the GFR of 50% of patients within ±10% of the measured GFR.Conclusion:In patients with SCI, GFR can be estimated independent of age, sex and muscle mass by a newly developed equation based on a single serum CysC value.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous parameter of the renal function in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C is a proteinase inhibitor with a low molecular weight. The serum levels of cystatin C are mainly dependent on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) making cystatin C an endogenous parameter of GFR. The aim of the study was to elucidate the applicability of serum cystatin C as a parameter of GFR in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function and to estimate a reference interval for serum cystatin C. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients (25 males and 21 females) aged 22 to 83 years with various kidney diseases and 250 blood donors (164 males and 86 females) aged 19 to 64 years were included. Cystatin C was measured by an automated particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay, serum creatinine by an enzymatic and by Jaffé method, urine creatinine by an enzymatic method, and GFR by 99mTc-DTPA clearance. RESULTS: Serum levels ofcystatin C and creatinine showed increments with decreasing values of 99mTc-DTPA clearance and a linear relationship was found between 99mTc-DTPA clearance and l/serum cystatin C, l/serum creatinine (enzymatic method), and creatinine clearance. Comparison of the non-parametric receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots for serum cystatin C (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.996; SE = 0.005), serum creatinine (enzymatic method) (AUC = 0.899; SE = 0.044), serum creatinine (Jaffé method) (AUC = 0.870; SE = 0.051), measured creatinine clearance (AUC = 0.959; SE = 0.025), and estimated creatinine clearance (0.950; SE = 0.029) revealed significant differences for serum cystatin C and serum creatinine (enzymatic and Jaffé method) (p values: 0.03 and 0.01). No significant differences were demonstrated between serum cystatin C and measured and estimated creatinine clearance (p value: 0.14 and 0.12). The non-parametric reference interval for serum cystatin C was calculated to be 0.51-1.02 mg/l (median: 0.79 mg/l; range: 0.33 - 1.07 mg/l). CONCLUSION: Serum cystatin C seems to be a better parameter of GFR than serum creatinine in adults with various types of kidney disease with normal to moderately impaired kidney function.     

Cystatin C does not detect acute changes in glomerular filtration rate in early diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND: The measurement of renal functional reserve (acute change in glomerular filtration rate [GFR] after protein load) allows the detection of sub-clinical renal dysfunction and has prognostic implications in diabetes. Our aim was to test cystatin C as an index of GFR and renal functional reserve. METHODS: GFR was measured by C(Sinistrin) at baseline and after protein load in 28 diabetic patients with serum creatinine <1.2 mg/dL. The C(Sinistrin) was compared with cystatin C, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and Cockcroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: Baseline C(Sinistrin) ranged from 67-172 mL/min. Regression analysis showed an overall low relationship between C(Sinistrin) and the indirect markers of GFR. The highest correlation with C(Sinistrin) was obtained for cystatin C clearance (R(2) = 0.58, r = 0.76, p < 0.001), the 1/serum cystatin C (R(2) = 0.58, r = 0.76, p < 0.001), and serum cystatin C (R(2) = 0.52, r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Renal functional reserve was preserved in 6 of 28 patients. There was no significant change in cystatin C in response to protein load. CONCLUSION: Wide variation in baseline GFR emphasizes the need for the early detection of renal dysfunction. Cystatin C correlated best with C(Sinistrin) at baseline, but did not detect renal functional reserve.     

Evaluation of cystatin C with iohexol clearance in cardiac surgery

Background: Post‐operative renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery is not uncommon and can lead to adverse outcome. The ability to accurately monitor renal function is therefore important. Cystatin C is known to be a sensitive marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but it has not been fully evaluated in cardiac surgery. Iohexol clearance is considered a reliable reference method for the determination of GFR. The aim of this study is to, for the first time, evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plasma cystatin C compared with iohexol clearance in cardiac surgery. Methods: Twenty‐one patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before surgery and on the second post‐operative day, an iohexol clearance was performed. Plasma cystatin C, plasma creatinine and plasma C‐reactive protein were determined before surgery and on the first, second, third and fifth post‐operative day. Estimated creatinine and cystatin C clearances were determined. Results: Post‐operative cystatin C and 1/cystatin C correlated strongly to iohexol clearance (r=?0.90 and 0.86) and so did creatinine and 1/creatinine (r=?0.83 and 0.78). Estimated creatinine clearance differed from iohexol clearance (P<0.01), whereas estimated cystatin C clearance did not differ from iohexol clearance (P=0.81). No correlation was found between C‐reactive protein and cystatin C. Conclusion: This study indicates that clearance estimations based on cystatin C are more accurate compared with estimations based on creatinine in determining GFR in cardiac surgery. Cystatin C has, in this study population, a stronger correlation to iohexol clearance than creatinine.     

Evolution and predictive power of serum cystatin C in acute renal failure

AIMS: The serum concentration of cystatin C has recently been proposed as a better indicator of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than plasma creatinine. Little is known about cystatin C in critical illness. We assessed serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function in acute renal failure (ARF) and its power in predicting survival of ARF patients. MATERIAL: 202 consecutive adult patients admitted into the intensive care unit (ICU) during a period of 9 months. METHOD: Serum cystatin C, plasma creatinine and plasma urea were measured on admission, daily during the first 3 days, and 5-7 times a week during the rest of the ICU stay. The patients with and without ARF were compared by the Mann-Whitney U-test. The correlation between different variables was calculated by Spearman's correlation. Forward stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to test independent predictors of mortality. The positive predictive value of serum cystatin C and plasma creatinine for ARF and mortality was calculated by ROC analysis. RESULTS: ARF occurred in 54 patients (27%). Serum cystatin C showed excellent positive predictive value for ARF in critical illness by ROC analysis. In acute renal dysfunction, abnormal values of serum cystatin C and plasma creatinine appeared equally quickly (median 3 days). The diagnosis of ARF, the day 1 Apache II score and admission plasma creatinine appeared as independent predictors of hospital mortality. ROC analysis showed only weak predictive power for serum cystatin C and plasma creatinine regarding hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cystatin C was as good as plasma creatinine in detecting ARF in intensive care patients. Neither marker was clinically useful in predicting mortality.     

The role of ultrasonography in the assessment of renal function in the elderly

BACKGROUND: Ageing is associated with a progressive loss of renal mass and kidney length and a decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study evaluated a possible correlation between renal function and kidney size measured by ultrasonography (US), and whether the latter helps estimate GFR in the elderly. METHODS: Twenty-five medically stable elderly patients (mean age 85 +/- 5 yrs) were examined in a geriatric ward at a university hospital. Blood samples were taken to determine serum creatinine (Cr) levels. On the same day, 51chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) clearance was performed as the gold standard of GFR. US measured kidney length, transverse and anteroposterior dimensions. RESULTS: Serum Cr (r=-0.67; p=0.0002), Cockcroft-Gault formula (r=0.82; p<0.0001), absolute length (r=0.51; p=0.008) and volume kidney (r=0.46; p=0.02) correlated significantly with GFR. After receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, length was less specific than sensitive in detecting renal impairment. Adding length to the Cockcroft-Gault formula did not improve GFR estimation (p=0.44). In contrast, adding length to serum Cr levels improved GFR estimation (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: In the elderly, kidney length and volume significantly correlated with GFR. However, length has a low specificity in predicting renal impairment. Therefore, in clinical practice, serum Cr levels and calculated Cr clearance are more useful in predicting renal impairment. However, normal kidney length can help to exclude renal impairment in the elderly at risk of GFR underestimation by a calculated Cr clearance.     

Determination of glomerular filtration rate in advanced renal insufficiency.

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been determined in 17 patients with advanced renal insufficiency (GFR less than 15 ml/min) by different clearance techniques using creatinine, inulin and 51Cr-EDTA as filtration markers. With renal inulin clearance as reference method for GFR, endogenous renal creatinine clearance overestimated GFR by an average of 30%. Renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA and inulin were closely correlated and thus 51Cr-EDTA is a suitable GFR marker even at low filtration rates. However, it was found that the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA overestimated the GFR often by more than 100% in the range 2.6--11.2 ml/min. Renal clearance measured during 24 h was lower than 4 h renal clearance with the patient well hydrated and resting in bed. It is concluded that the precise measurement of low glomerular filtration rates requires the use of renal clearance techniques. Four-hour 51Cr-EDTA renal clearance is a suitable method for measuring and following the development of renal function in advanced renal insufficiency.     

Serum cystatin C as a marker of the renal function in patients with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, and (51)Cr-EDTA-clearance in patients with spinal cord injury. SETTING: The Spinal Cord Unit, Viborg-Kjellerup County Hospital. METHODS: Twenty-four men and seven women aged 20.3 to 68.0 years with motor complete spinal cord injury (ASIA A or B) were included. Serum cystatin C was measured by an automated particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay (Dade Behring), serum creatinine by an enzymatic method (Vitros 950), and (51)Cr-EDTA-clearance by a multiple plasma sample method. RESULTS: A linear relationship was found between (51)Cr-EDTA-clearance and the reciprocal values of cystatin C and creatinine. The correlation coefficient between (51)Cr-EDTA-clearance and 1/cystatin C was 0.72 compared to the correlation coefficient between (51)Cr-EDTA-clearance and 1/creatinine being 0.26. Comparison of the area under the curves in the non-parametric receiver operating characteristics (ROC) plots for serum cystatin C (area under the curve (AUC)=0.912; SE=0.065), and serum creatinine (AUC=0.507; SE=0.115) revealed significant differences (P-values=0.0005). CONCLUSION: In patients with spinal cord injury serum cystatin C is a better marker of the renal function compared to serum creatinine.     

Comparison of serum cystatin C and creatinine levels in determining glomerular filtration rate in children with stage I to III chronic renal disease

Abstract

Background: Pediatric studies are relatively scarce on the superiority of cystatin C over creatinine in estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study measured cystatin C and serum creatinine levels, and compared GFR estimated from these two parameters in patients with chronic renal disease. Methods: This prospective, observational, controlled study included 166 patients aged 1–18 years diagnosed with stage I to III chronic renal disease, and 29 age- and sex-matched control subjects. In all patients, GFR was estimated via creatinine clearance, Schwartz formula, Zappitelli 1 and Zappitelli 2 formula and the results were compared using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Patients and controls did not differ with regard to height, body weight, BMI, serum creatinine and serum cystatin levels, and Schwartz formula-based GFR (p?>?0.05). There was a significant relationship between creatinine and cystatin C levels. However, although creatinine levels showed a significant association with age, height, and BMI, cystatin C levels showed no such association. ROC analysis showed that cystatin C performed better than creatinine in detecting low GFR. Conclusion: Cystatin C is a more sensitive and feasible indicator than creatinine for the diagnosis of stage I to III chronic renal disease.     

Glomerular filtration rate estimated from the uptake phase of 99mTc-DTPA renography in chronic renal failure.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from 99mTc-DTPA renography with that estimated from the renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA, creatinine and urea. METHODS: Fifty patients with reduced renal function (serum creatinine between 150 and 600 micromol/l) were enrolled in the study. GFR was estimated from the uptake phase of 99mTc-DTPA renography (GFR(DTPA)). The renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA (GFR(EDTA)) was used as the reference method. Creatinine clearance (C(Cr)), urea clearance (C(Ur)) and the mean of urea and creatinine clearance (C(Cr+Ur)/2) were also calculated from urine collected during a period of 24 h. Limits of agreement were used for method comparison. RESULTS: The limit of agreement between GFR(DTPA) and GFR(EDTA) was 2 +/- 17 ml/min. The mean difference did not deviate significantly from zero. The other clearance techniques had larger limits of agreement and a mean difference significantly different from zero. Furthermore, C(Ur) and C(Cr+Ur)/2 had systematic deviations of the differences, indicating that C(Ur) and C(Cr+Ur)/2 are poor estimates of GFR. CONCLUSION: The limit of agreement between GFR(DTPA) and GFR(EDTA) are acceptable and, therefore, GFR estimated from 99mTc-DTPA renography is acceptable for clinical use in patients with reduced renal function. Furthermore, the method is simple and less time consuming compared with renal clearance techniques.     

Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates from serum creatinine has not been generalizable across all populations. Cystatin C has been proposed as an alternative marker for estimating GFR. The objective of this study was to compare cystatin C with serum creatinine for estimating GFR among different clinical presentations. Cystatin C and serum creatinine levels were obtained from adult patients (n=460) during an evaluation that included a GFR measurement by iothalamate clearance. Medical records were abstracted for clinical presentation (healthy, native chronic kidney disease or transplant recipient) at the time of GFR measurement. GFR was modeled using the following variables: cystatin C (or serum creatinine), age, gender and clinical presentation. The relationship between cystatin C and GFR differed across clinical presentations. At the same cystatin C level, GFR was 19% higher in transplant recipients than in patients with native kidney disease (P<0.001). The association between cystatin C and GFR was stronger among native kidney disease patients than in healthy persons (P<0.001 for statistical interaction). Thus, a cystatin C equation was derived using only patients with native kidney disease (n=204). The correlation with GFR (r(2)=0.853) was slightly higher than a serum creatinine equation using the same sample (r(2)=0.827), the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (r(2)=0.825) or the Cockcroft-Gault equation (r(2)=0.796). Averaged estimates between cystatin C and serum creatinine equations further improved correlation (r(2)=0.891). Cystatin C should not be interpreted as purely a marker of GFR. Other factors, possibly inflammation or immunosuppression therapy, affect cystatin C levels. While recognizing this limitation, cystatin C may improve GFR estimates in chronic kidney disease patients.     

Diagnostic sensitivity of serum cystatin for impaired glomerular filtration rate

Recently, the reciprocal of cystatin C (Cys-C), a non-glycosylated 13-kilodalton protein that is produced by all investigated nucleated cells, was found to correlate closely with glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In order to determine the diagnostic validity in children for the detection of impaired GFR, venous blood samples from 381 children (aged 1.7–18 years) with various renal pathology referred for ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance investigations were obtained for measurement of Cys-C as well as β₂-microglobulin (β2-MG) and serum creatinine. Two hundred and sixteen children with clearance values >90 ml/min per 1.73 m² constituted a control group, with a normal GFR. In the control group, Cys-C values were normally distributed with a mean of 0.94±0.27 mg/l and an upper reference limit (97.5th percentile) of 1.47 mg/l. In all children, there was a positive correlation between ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance and the reciprocal of Cys-C (r=0.64, P<0.0001), β₂-MG (r=0.59, P<0.0001), creatinine (r=0.55, P<0.0001), and the height/creatinine ratio (r=0.73, P<0.0001). Receiver-operating characteristics analysis showed that there were no significant differences between these three parameters for discriminating between patients with normal and reduced GFR, although there was a tendency towards the best diagnostic sensitivity of the GFR estimate according to the Schwartz formula. We conclude that for the detection of mildly impaired GFR, a full clearance study cannot be replaced by measurement of serum Cys-C or β2-MG concentrations. Received: 15 June 1998 / Revised: 22 September 1998 / Accepted: 23 September 1998     

Serum cystatin C--a superior marker of rapidly reduced glomerular filtration after uninephrectomy in kidney donors compared to creatinine

AIMS: Acute renal failure (ARF), defined by a rapid decrease of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is associated with high mortality. Early and accurate detection of decreasing GFR is critical to prevent the progression of ARF and to potentially improve its outcome. Serum creatinine, the conventional GFR marker, has major limitations. We prospectively evaluated whether serum cystatin C detected a rapid GFR decrease earlier and more accurately than serum creatinine. METHODS: In ten patients undergoing nephrectomy for living related kidney transplantation, serum creatinine and cystatin C were determined daily. The decrease of GFR was quantitated preoperatively by creatinine clearance and MAG3 scintigraphy. The GFR decrease was defined by a 50-100% increase of cystatin C or creatinine from preoperative values. Ten patients without renal impairment served as controls. RESULTS: Initially, patients had a creatinine clearance of 105 +/- 14 ml/min/1.73 m2. Due to nephrectomy, patients lost 45 +/- 3% of their renal function. Serum cystatin C significantly increased already one, serum creatinine two days after nephrectomy. Cystatin C demonstrated an increase by 50-100% 1.4 +/- 0.9 days earlier than creatinine (p = 0.009). Serum cystatin C performed well detecting the GFR decrease with higher diagnostic values compared to creatinine. This was indicated by a sensitivity of 50, 70 and 80% of cystatin C to detect the GFR decrease on the three days following nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cystatin C detects rapid GFR decreases one to two days earlier than creatinine. Cystatin C is an early and accurate marker to detect rapid GFR decreases as in ARF.     

Serum cystatin C as a reliable marker of changes in glomerular filtration rate in children with urinary tract malformations

PURPOSE: Cystatin C has been suggested as a simple method of estimating GFR more accurately than creatinine in children. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C with serum creatinine and the Schwartz formula for estimating GFR in patients with UTMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively compared 72 patients with UTMs (20 days to 36 months old, 58 males and 14 females) with a group of 72 healthy controls (10 days to 48 months old, 53 males and 19 females). All patients underwent nuclear medicine clearance investigations with (99m)Tc DTPA. RESULTS: Serum concentration of cystatin C revealed a higher correlation with (99m)Tc DTPA (r = 0.62, p <0.001) than serum concentration of creatinine (r = 0.30, p <0.01) or Schwartz formula (r = 0.51, p <0.001). These results were more evident in patients with uropathy (19) with mild renal impairment. Agreement between methods was assessed using Bland Altman analysis. Mean differences between GFR calculated with (99m)Tc DTPA and cystatin C based GFR estimation or Schwartz formula were -2.6% +/- 46.7% and -73.4% +/- 53.6%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy in identifying decreased GFR measured as AUC was always highest for cystatin C but hardly sufficient for the 3 variables. Cystatin C performed better in the 0 to 6-month-olds (0.70 +/- 0.08 for cystatin C, 0.58 +/- 0.07 for Schwartz estimate) and patients older than 12 months (0.82 +/- 0.09 for cystatin C, 0.65 +/- 0.11 for Schwartz estimate). CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C proved to be a superior marker rate over serum creatinine in estimating glomerular filtration in children younger than 3 years with UTMs and mild renal impairment, thus, offering a more specific and practical measure for monitoring GFR.     

Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of renal function in patients with renal transplants is of great importance. Various studies have reported cystatin C as an easily and rapidly assessable marker that can be used for accurate information on renal function impairment. To date, no study is available to define the role of cystatin C in patients with renal transplants. METHODS: Thirty steady-state patients (50% male/50% female) with status post-kidney transplantation were studied. To assess renal function, cystatin C, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, beta2-microglobulin (beta2M), and [125I]iothalamate clearance were determined. Correlations and non-parametric ROC curves for accuracy, using a cut-off glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 60 ml/min, were obtained for the different markers allowing for calculations of positive predictive values (PPV), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Further, to evaluate the usefulness of these markers for monitoring, intraindividual coefficients of variation (CVs) for cystatin C and creatinine measurements were compared in 85 renal transplant patients. Measurements consisted of at least six pairs of results, which were obtained at different time points during routine follow-up. RESULTS: Cystatin C correlated best with GFR (r=0.83), whereas serum creatinine (r=0.67), creatinine clearance (r=0.57) and beta2M (r=0.58) all had lower correlation coefficients. The diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was significantly better than serum creatinine (P=0.025), but did not differ significantly from creatinine clearance (P=0.76) and beta2M (P=0.43). At a cut-off of 1.64 mg/l, cystatin C has a PPV of 93%, PLR of 6.4, specificity 89% and sensitivity 70%, respectively. For beta2M, PPV 83%, PLR 1.7, specificity 67% and sensitivity 75% was seen at a cut-off of 3.57 mg/l. Accordingly, at a cut-off of 125 micromol/l for serum creatinine, a PPV 76%, PLR 1.4, specificity 44% and sensitivity 80% was revealed. Finally, at a cut-off of 66 ml/min/1.73 m2 for creatinine clearance, the following characteristics were found: PPV 94%, PLR 7.7, specificity 89% and sensitivity 85%. The intraindividual variation of creatinine was significantly lower than that of cystatin C (P<0.001). With increasing concentrations, their ratios of CV tended towards a value of 1, demonstrating identical variability at low GFR. CONCLUSION: Together, our data show that in patients with renal transplants, cystatin C, in terms of PPV and PLR, has a similar diagnostic value as creatinine clearance. However, it is superior to serum determinations of creatinine and beta2M. The intraindividual variation of cystatin C is greater than that of creatinine. This might be due to the better ability of cystatin C to reflect temporary changes especially in mildly impaired GFR, most critical for early detection of rejection and other function impairment. Thus, cystatin C allows for rapid and accurate assessment of renal function (GFR) in renal transplants and is clearly superior to the commonly used serum creatinine.