Correlation of 24-hr esophageal pH patterns with clinical features and endoscopy in gastroesophageal reflux disease

We performed 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in north Indian patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and correlated it with symptom severity and endoscopic abnormalities. Thirty-six consecutive patients with symptomatic GERD and 16 healthy volunteers underwent objective grading of clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings. Total, supine, and upright reflux periods as well as frequency and duration of reflux episodes were determined from the 24-hr pH-metry record using standard software. This was abnormal in 32 patients, who could be categorized into upright refluxers (31.2%), supine refluxers (34.4%), and combined refluxers (34.4%). Supine reflux and upright reflux were distinct entities that did not correlate with each other (r=0.22,P=NS). In upright refluxers, symptoms (P<0.02) and=" endoscopic=" abnormalities=">P<0.005) were=" milder=" than=" in=" combined=" refluxers.=" total=" duration=" of=" acid=" exposure=" correlated=" significantly=" with=" severity=" of=" symptoms=">P<0.001) and=" endoscopic=" esophagitis=">P<0.005). patients=" with=" gerd=" had=" three=" distinct=" patterns=" of=" abnormal=" gastroesophageal=" reflux,=" with=" upright=" refluxers=" having=" milder=" disease=" and=" supine=" and=" combined=" refluxers=" having=" more=" severe=" disease.=" this=" may=" reflect=" differences=" in=" underlying=" mechanisms=" of=">     

Relationship between 24 h ambulatory esophageal pHmetry and upper digestive endoscopy in reflux esophagitis patients]

The reflux gastroesophageal patients can be divided in three patterns, according with ambulatorial esophageal 24 h-pHmetry: orthostatic, which the reflux episodes occur when the patients are upright; supine, which the reflux episodes occur when the patients are sleeping; combined, when the reflux episodes are both observed in upright or lay down position. There are presented 56 patients with endoscopic reflux esophagitis who are divided according to the patterns of reflux by 24 h-pHmetry. The results are similar to those of international reports. Complicated esophagitis is more common in the combined refluxers following by supine refluxers. In the orthostatic refluxers were not observed complicated esophagitis. The 24 h-pHmetry is an useful tool for clinical use and prognosis in the gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

Exclusion of meal periods from ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring May improve diagnosis of esophageal acid reflux

Distal esophageal pH less than 4 is frequently seen during meal ingestion in 24-hr ambulatory pH monitoring for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The characteristics of this meal-related apparent reflux without diet restriction was evaluated. Data from normal volunteers (N=21) and consecutive patients (N=66) referred with heartburn and/or chest pain were studied with ambulatory pH monitoring. The median percent times pH<4 in the distal esophagus were significantly greater in symptomatic patients than controls for total 24-hr, upright, and supine periods, and postprandial periods of 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min (P values of 0.007–0.03). However, the median percent time pH<4 during the meal periods was the same for patients (4.4%) and for controls (6.6%) withP=0.23. Excluding the meal periods from analysis resulted in greater separation between controls and patients with abnormal acid exposure when compared to the conventional method. Patients should maintain their usual routine without diet restriction during 24-hr ambulatory pH studies in the clinical setting. Furthermore, exclusion of meal periods can eliminate meal-time pH variabilities without affecting postprandial acid exposure and improve the diagnosis of GERD.     

Effect of positions,eating, and bronchodilators on gastroesophageal reflux in asthmatics

Gastroesophageal reflux is common in asthmatics. To determine whether bronchodilators, the supine position, or eating affect gastroesophageal reflux, we performed ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring on 44 controls and 104 unselected adult asthmatics. All asthmatics had discrete attacks of wheezing and documented reversible airway obstruction of at least 20%. The presence or absence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms was not used as a criterion for patient selection. Chronic bronchodilator therapy was required by 71.2% of the asthmatics, and was continued during the test. Asthmatics had significantly worse GER than controls during the 3-hr postprandial period, which continued into the nonpostprandial period up to the next meal. Significant differences were present for esophageal mucosal acid contact time, frequency of reflux episodes, and clearance times. During the nonpostprandial periods asthmatics had four times the acid reflux as controls and 19-fold the frequency of prolonged reflux episodes. There were no differences between asthmatics on bronchodilators and those not on bronchodilators in any of the reflux parameters during the upright (postprandial, nonpostprandial) period or supine (sleep) period (P=NS). We conclude that: (1) regardless of the use of bronchodilator therapy, asthmatics have significant GER when asleep and after meals that continues beyond the postprandial period to the next meal; and (2) asthmatics receiving bronchodilators have similar gastroesophageal reflux patterns after eating, in the nonpostprandial period, and when asleep as asthmatics not receiving bronchodilators.     

Ambulatory Esophageal pH Recording in Gastroesophageal Reflux: Relevance to the Development of Esophagitis

In a group of 60 patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux (GER), we carried out upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring to assess the relationship between acid reflux and esophagitis. The results of 24-h pH measurement were compared with those of 15 asymptomatic control subjects who were studied with ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring only. Thirty-two patients (53.3%) had a normal esophagus macroscopically, and 28 patients (46.7%) had some degree of esophagitis. There was no significant difference between the two groups with and without esophagitis, regarding male:female ratio, age, and duration of symptoms. The group with esophagitis was more symptomatic (p less than 0.001) than the group without, and differed significantly in relation to all pH variables, i.e., number of GER episodes per hour, duration of mucosal exposure to acid (pH less than 4), and number of GER episodes requiring more than 5 min to clear per hour for the upright, supine, and 24-h periods, compared with the control group (p less than 0.001) and the group without esophagitis (p less than 0.001). In the group with esophagitis, comparison of the above pH variables in the upright and supine periods showed significantly higher values in the upright than in the supine period for the total number of reflux episodes per hour (p less than 0.001) and the number of episodes greater than 5 min/h (p less than 0.05). We conclude that the presence of esophagitis is related to both frequency and duration of GER episodes. Our findings also stress the importance of daytime acid exposure in the pathogenesis of esophagitis.     

24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. An analysis of 21 cases]

Esophageal pH monitoring was carried out with self-made portable pH recorder in 21 subjects for 24 hours under normal conditions. The results were as follows: the number of physiological gastroesophageal reflux (GER, pH < 4) was less than 23 times; the percentage of GER duration calculated by dividing the cumulative time of pH less than 4 by the total monitoring time was less than 1.4; the percentage was about 2 in upright position and less than 0.2 in lying position; the duration of the longest reflux episode was less than 5 minutes; the physiological gastroesophageal reflux occurred more often in upright position; while the pathological GER took place both in upright and lying position. Our study also indicated that the degree of esophagitis had no relation with the type of GER.     

Abnormal acid reflux in asthmatic patients in a region with low GERD prevalence

Background A high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in asthmatic patients has been reported from North America and Europe. However, only a few data from Asia are available. This study evaluated the incidence of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in asthmatic patients in Taiwan.Methods Fifty-six consecutive ambulatory patients with clinically stable asthma (41 men and 15 women; age, 57.7 ± 12.4 years; range, 24 to 74 years) were evaluated prospectively. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.Results Twenty-nine patients (51.8%) had abnormal GER, as defined by 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. There were 42 patients without endoscopic evidence of esophagitis, 10 patients with Los Angeles (LA) grade A esophagitis, and 4 patients with LA grade B esophagitis. The esophageal motility function studies revealed 21 patients with normal esophageal motility, 23 patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and 12 patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorders other than IEM. Although the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure was higher in the patients without GER, the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusions Abnormal GER seems to be a clinically significant problem in asthmatic patients in Taiwan. The most common esophageal motility dysfunction is IEM. However, the status of Helicobacter pylori infection plays no role in abnormal GER.     

十二指肠球部溃疡伴胃食管反流患者食管动力及胃内pH值监测

目的：探讨胃食管反流(GER)常见于十二指肠球部溃疡的原因。方法：选择近5年我院接受胃食管动力检查并行胃镜检查明确诊断为十二指肠球部溃疡的患者46例。食管pH监测胃食管酸反流阳性或胃镜检查存在反流性食管炎(RE)者为反流组，食管pH值监测胃食管酸反流阴性者为非反流组。比较两组食管下括约肌(IES)、食管体部及食管上括约肌(UES)等功能差别，同时对两组胃pH值监测进行比较。结果：十二指肠球部溃疡患者为GER／RE的高发人群，反流组与非反流组LES长度、功能压、食管体部清除功能、UES静息压比较差异无显著性。反流组每日不同时限胃酸分泌高于非反流组。结论：十二指肠球部溃疡易合并GER／RE与胃酸增高有关，与食管动力变化关系不大。     

41例老年人胃食管反流病24小时食管pH测定结果分析

目的探讨老年人食管酸暴露频率强度与胃食管反流病的关系。方法应用食管ｐＨ测定方法，对４１例有胃食管反流症状者和１５例健康老年人进行２４小时食管ｐＨ监测。结果健康老年人ｐＨ＜４的总时间百分比＜３３％，立位ｐＨ＜４时间百分比＜５５％，反流＞５分钟次数＜２次，ｐＨ＜４反流次数＜６５次，但卧位ｐＨ＜４时间百分比为＜１４％。４１例有胃食管反流症状者中，３８例酸反流得分＞１４５，包括１５例内镜下无食管炎征象者，阳性率达９２５％。根据内镜下有无食管炎，比较食管粘膜损伤组与无食管粘膜损伤组之间各项ｐＨ指标的异同。可见ｐＨ＜４的总时间百分比、卧位ｐＨ＜４时间百分比和持续反流＞５分钟次数有明显不同。结论老年人食管粘膜暴露频率时间与胃食管反流病的严重程度有关。     

正常人和胃食管反流病人的昼夜食管pH和动力变化

目的:为探讨正常人和胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD)病人昼夜食管运动规律以及食管运动与酸反流的关系。方法:45例GERD病人和10名正常人均接受食管测压和动态食管pH及压力同步监测。结果:(1)下食管括约肌压、远端食管蠕动压及有效食管蠕动百分比在酸反流DeMeester高计分组明显低于低计分组(P<0.05),在反流性食管炎组也明显低于非反流性食管炎组(P<0.05)。(2)有GERD症状或食管炎的卧位有效蠕动百分比明显低于立位(P<0.05)。反流性食管炎组80％有夜间或伴有夜间反流,而不伴反流性食管炎的GERD无1例出现夜间反流。结论:昼夜食管pH和压力动态监测有利于进一步探讨GERD的运动病理,除LES功能外,食管清除功能在GERD发病中起重要作用。     

Esophageal Motility in Nonacid Reflux Compared with Acid Reflux

Esophageal motility has been well studied in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and acid reflux, but not in nonacid reflux. Consecutive patients who had both 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) and esophageal motility tests for suspected GERD were studied. Patients were grouped into nonacid refluxers, acid refluxers, and nonrefluxers based on positive symptom correlation and objective findings of acid reflux. Of 96 patients enrolled, 21 patients (22%) were nonacid refluxers, 44 patients (46%) were acid refluxers, and 31 patients (32%) had no objective evidence of reflux. Normal motility was recorded in 86% of nonacid refluxers, 71% of acid refluxers, and 60% of nonrefluxers. Ineffective esophageal motility was seen in 24% of acid refluxers, and 5% of nonacid refluxers (P = 0.11). Symptomatic nonacid reflux events comprised 22% of patients studied for GERD symptoms by MII-pH. Esophageal motility in nonacid reflux is normal 86% of the time.     

Utility of inpatient 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux

The aims of the present study were to evaluate the accuracy of 24-hr intraesophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux in the hospital setting and to establish whether there were any differences in terms of reflux events between patients with and without endoscopic esophagitis. Fifteen control subjects and 47 patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease were studied. A composite score of reflux events (number of reflux episodes; total, upright, and supine reflux time; number of refluxes lasting more than 5 min; and duration of the longest reflux) provided the best discrimination between controls and patients (94% sensitivity and 100% specificity). Patients with esophagitis showed concurrently a longer total reflux time and supine reflux time, and more prolonged reflux episodes than those without esophagitis. On the other hand the severity of esophagitis was directly related to the duration of both total and supine reflux. The results indicate that inpatient 24-hr pH-metry is very accurate in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. They also suggest that prolonged esophageal exposure to acid, particularly at night, and slow esophageal acid clearing are factors that determine the appearance and/or perpetuation of esophagitis in patients with reflux.     

Upright Refluxers without Esophagitis Differentiated from Bipositional Refluxers with Esophagitis by Simultaneous Manometry and pH Monitoring Conducted in Two Postures Before and After a Meal

Objective: To determine whether two dissimilar groups characterized hy 24-h esophageal pH monitoring would have individual reflux events that occur under the same or different circumstances when challenged by a meal and monitored in different postures. These groups consisted of upright refluxers without esophagitis (n = 10) versus bipositional refluxers with esophagitis (n = 8). Methods: Our evaluation consisted of a questionnaire completed prior to simultaneous manometry and pH monitoring. This monitoring was conducted over a 120-min period that incorporated the upright and recumhent postures both before and after a meal. Three of our four criteria for reflux were independent of a classic pH event. Results: From the questionnaire, it was apparent that dyspeptic symptoms almost always occurred in the upright refluxers. In addition, provocation for their heartburn had atypical characteristics regarding posture, and their degree of regurgitation was intensified by the postprandial state. During dual monitoring, the upright posture and the meal provoked an increase in frequency of reflux in the upright refluxers, as opposed to only recumhency in the bipositional refluxers. Moreover, reflux events in the upright refluxers usually were associated with Valsalva maneuvers and were recognized as symptoms, two features that were less true in the bipositional refluxers. A similar percentage of reflux events occurred over a low basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and after a lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, in both groups. Conclusion: The two groups manifested distinctively different reflux characteristics, presumably due to dissimilar mechanisms.     

Randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled crossover trial of pirenzepine in patients with gastroesophageal reflux

A muscarinic receptor subtype 1 (M1) antagonist, pirenzepine, recently has been shown to be relatively free of the usual anticholinergic side effects on esophageal smooth muscle and thus has been implicated for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the effect of pirenzepine on GERD remains to be defined. Thirteen patients who demonstrated GERD in a baseline 24-hr ambulatory intraesophageal pH monitoring study were randomized in a double-blind crossover fashion to receive pirenzepine and placebo. An ambulatory 24-hr intraesophageal pH monitor was used to assess reduction in reflux (esophageal pH less than 4.0) with respect to position (upright vs supine), to total number of reflux episodes, and to episodes greater than 5 min. A significant effect for pirenzepine was seen for episodes greater than 5 min (t = 2.61, P = 0.023) and a trend towards significance was seen for total (upright and supine positions combined) percent time of reflux (t = 2.13, P = 0.055). Although not statistically significant, pirenzepine consistently showed greater reduction in all parameters of reflux tested. A greater reduction in percent time of reflux in supine vs upright positions (pirenzepine: 58.9% vs 21.4%; placebo: 43.6% vs 7.3%) may be clinically important in prevention of esophageal injury due to reflux in the recumbent position. Pirenzepine may provide a unique alternative for some GERD patients who may be refractory to other therapies of GERD.     

Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux as a cause of idiopathic hoarseness

Eleven patients presenting to an ear, nose, and throat specialist were diagnosed as having idiopathic hoarseness and prospectively evaluated for evidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) to determine if an association existed. Testing for GER included voice analysis, EGD, esophageal manometry, Bernstein test, and ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring. Six of the 11 (55%) hoarse patients studied had GER by pH monitoring (mean score 105 +/- 23), and most reflux episodes were supine and prolonged (20.9 +/- 8.2% supine pH less than 4.0, longest 129 min). All patients with abnormal pH monitoring had endoscopic esophagitis (Barrett's esophagus in two, peptic stricture in one, and erosive esophagitis in three), while none of the patients with normal scores had esophagitis. Symptoms of throat pain or nocturnal heartburn were more common in the GER-positive patients (6 of 6 vs 1 of 5), and clinically helpful in discriminating which hoarse patients had pathologic GER. Treatment with ranitidine 150 mg per os twice a day for 12 weeks improved esophagitis in all patients, but the voice improved in only one of the two patients with completely healed esophagitis. This study suggests that (1) GER is frequently seen in patients with idiopathic hoarseness (55%), (2) hoarse patients with throat pain or nocturnal heartburn are likely to have severe esophagitis and should be evaluated by EGD, and (3) additional antireflux and voice therapy may be necessary to heal esophagitis and improve the voice.     

Prolonged intraesophageal pH monitoring with 16-Hr overnight recording

From studies in 43 patients (17 male, 26 female, mean age 51 years), we compared the analysis of the routine complete "24-hr" ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring study to that of the 16-hr overnight interval (4:00 PM to 8:00 AM). The latter included a major meal with an upright postprandial period and a recumbent period. All patients were monitored for at least 20 hr (median = 22.6 hr). The percent distal esophageal pH less than 4.0 and number of reflux episodes were measured for the total, upright, and recumbent periods of both the 16-hr and "24-hr" monitoring times. Significant (P less than 0.001) positive correlations were found for all comparisons between the two monitoring periods including percent time of pH less than 4.0 (total: r = 0.98; upright: r = 0.96) and number of episodes (totals r = 0.97; upright: r = 0.93). Patients were separated into normal and abnormal refluxers based on results of "24-hr" monitoring (pH below 4.0 greater than 4.2% total time; greater than 6.0% upright; greater than 1.2% recumbent). Based on this, sensitivity and specificity for 16-hr monitoring were as follows: total study: 86% and 95%; upright: 80% and 91%; recumbent: 100% for both. Conclusions: (1) a 16-hr overnight pH monitoring period can provide a reliable representation of "24-hr" distal esophageal acid exposure, (2) this shorter monitoring may improve patient acceptability and compliance, and (3) the symptom index was changed in 26.3% of patients using the 16-hr evaluation.     

Upright versus supine reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Postural measures are early recommendations in the management of heartburn, and are aimed at preventing acid reflux through an incompetent lower esophageal sphincter (LES). However, LES incompetence is found in only a minority of patients, and transient LES relaxations, primarily in the upright position, are currently recognized as the main pathophysiological abnormality in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We investigated the importance of supine acid reflux in patients with GERD. METHODS: Upon review of their clinical, manometric, pH monitoring and endoscopic characteristics, 85 patients with reflux symptoms were classified into three groups: Group A (n=22), consisting of symptomatic patients without esophagitis or pathological reflux; group B (n=38), symptomatic patients with reflux but no endoscopic esophagitis; and group C (n=25), symptomatic patients with both ulcerative or complicated esophagitis and pathological reflux. RESULTS: All groups were similar in age distribution. Groups B and C had a higher prevalence of hiatal hernia and reflux symptoms. Manometry revealed similar LES pressures in groups A and B, but lower LES pressure in group C (P < 0.005). In groups A and B, supine reflux, in terms of percentage of time with pH < 4, was less pronounced than upright reflux (P < 0.0001). In contrast, group C supine reflux was as pronounced as the upright reflux. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients reflux in the upright position. Only patients with complicated esophagitis have significant bipositional acid reflux. These findings suggest that unless the patient has severe reflux disease, postural measures may not be indicated.     

Effect of hiatal hernia on esophageal manometry and pH-metry in gastroesophageal reflux disease

An increased frequency of reflux events and a prolonged acid clearance have been shown in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) patients with a hiatal hernia as compared to those without. The objective of the present study was to further investigate esophageal motility and patterns of reflux in GER patients, in relation to the presence or absence of hiatal hernia. Esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH-metry were used in 42 patients with GER and 18 controls. Eighteen of the patients were considered to have a nonreducing hiatal hernia on endoscopy. Hiatal hernia patients showed a higher extent of reflux (total composite score,P=0.016; total reflux time,P=0.008, reflux time in supine position,P=0.024; reflux time in upright position,P=0.008), a lower frequency of reflux events (P=0.005), a more severe esophagitis on endoscopy (P<0.01) and a lower amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to LES (P=0.0009) as compared to patients without hiatal hernia. The amplitude of peristalsis at the distal esophagus was inversely related to the extent of reflux (P=0.024). Acid clearance was also significantly prolonged in the hernia subgroup (P=0.011). Although LES resting pressure did not differ significantly between the two subgroups of patients, it was inversely related to the extent of reflux in the patients with hiatal hernia (P=0.0005). It is concluded, that GER patients with hiatal hernia present with an increased amount of reflux and more severe esophagitis, which results in more severely impaired esophageal peristalsis as compared to patients without hernia. Prolonged acid clearance and impaired esophageal emptying observed in patients with hiatal hernia could be the result of both the presence of the hernia itself and the reduced peristaltic activity of the esophagus.     

Role of Esophageal Function Tests in Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinicians typically make the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from the clinical findings and then prescribe acid-suppressing drugs. Endoscopy is usually done for persistent or severe symptoms. Esophageal function tests (EFTs: esophageal manometry and 24-hr pH monitoring) are generally reserved for patients who have the most severe disease, including those being considered for surgery. We hypothesized that EFTs are more accurate than symptoms and endoscopy in the diagnosis of GERD. This was a retrospective study undertaken in a university tertiary care center. Between October 1989 and November 1998, 822 patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD (based on symptoms and endoscopic findings) were referred for EFTs. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the 24-hr pH monitoring score showed GERD (group A, GERD^–; group B, GERD⁺). The groups were compared with respect to the incidence and severity of symptoms, presence of a hiatal hernia on barium x-rays, presence and severity of esophagitis on endoscopy, and esophageal motility. In all, 247 patients (30%) had normal reflux scores (group A, GERD^–), and 575 patients (70%) had abnormal scores (Group B, GERD⁺). Eighty percent of group A and 88% of group B had been treated with acid-suppressing medications. The incidence of heartburn and regurgitation was similar in the two groups. Grade I–II esophagitis was diagnosed by endoscopy in 25% of group A and 35% of group B, and grade III esophagitis in 4% of group A and 11% of group B. Esophageal manometry showed that group B more often had esophageal dysmotility, consisting of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis. These data show that: (1) symptoms were unreliable for diagnosing GERD; (2) endoscopic evidence of grade I–II esophagitis was diagnostically nonspecific, and grade III was much less certain than claimed in other reports; and (3) pH monitoring identified patients with GERD and stratified them according to the severity of the disease. We conclude that esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are important in diagnosing GERD accurately. More liberal use of these tests early in patient management would avoid much improper and costly medical therapy and would help single out for special attention the patients with GERD who have the most severe disease.     

Ineffective motility is not a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) may be a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), particularly supraesophageal reflux disease. We evaluated the relationship between esophageal acid exposure and esophageal body motility in patients undergoing both esophageal manometry and 24-h pH metry in the absence of antisecretory therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective database review of 84 patients (mean age 47 yr, 46% male) evaluated in our GI physiology laboratory. The indication for testing was recorded and characterized as esophageal or supraesophageal. Abnormal esophageal acid exposure was defined as a distal esophageal pH <4 for more than 4.2% of the total monitoring time (>6.3% upright, >1.2% supine) or a proximal esophageal acid exposure time of greater than 1.1% total (>1.3% upright, 0% supine). IEM was defined as more than two of 10 ineffective peristaltic waves. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients had esophageal-presenting symptoms, and 12 had supraesophageal symptoms. The prevalence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure was similar in patients with esophageal and supraesophageal symptoms (69% vs 92%, p = 0.17). Abnormal motility was identified in 26 patients (31%). IEM was the most common motility disturbance (77%, 20 patients). The frequency of motility disorders was similar in patients with and without abnormal esophageal acid exposure (30% vs 35%, p = 0.79), in patients with esophageal or supraesophageal symptoms (32% vs 25%, p = 0.75, for all patients; 30% vs 27%, p = 1.00, for patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure), and among upright, supine, and combined refluxers (33%, 9%, and 35%, p = 0.26).CONCLUSIONS: IEM does not stand alone as a significant marker for the presence of GERD in general or supraesophageal reflux disease in particular.