One-year mortality of bloodstream infection-associated sepsis and septic shock among patients presenting to a regional critical care system

Objective The long-term mortality outcome associated with sepsis and septic shock has not been well defined in a nonselected critically ill population. This study investigated the occurrence and the role of bloodstream infection (BSI) associated sepsis and septic shock at time of intensive care unit (ICU) admission on the 1-year mortality of patients admitted to a regional critical care system.Design and setting Population-based inception cohort in all adult multidisciplinary and cardiovascular ICUs in the Calgary Health Region (population approx. 1 million) between 1 July 1999 and 31 March 2002.Patients and participants Adults (18 years; n=4,845) who had at least one ICU admission to CHR ICUs.Results In 251 (5%) patients there was BSI-associated sepsis at presentation to ICU, and 159 of these also had septic shock. The 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality rates overall were 18%, 21%, and 24%: 23%, 30%, and 36% for BSI-associated sepsis without shock, and 51%, 57%, and 61% with shock, respectively. Surgical diagnosis, BSI-associated sepsis, and increasing age were independently associated with late (28-day to 1-year) mortality whereas higher APACHE II and TISS scores were associated with reduced odds in logistic regression analysis.Conclusions BSI-associated sepsis and septic shock are associated with increased risk of mortality persisting after 28-days up to 1 year or more. Follow-up duration beyond 28 days better defines the burden of illness associated with these syndromes.Electronic Supplementary Material Electronic supplementary material to this paper can be obtained by using the Springer Link server located at .     

Sepsis in patients with intracranial hemorrhage: incidence and influence on outcome

The aim of the study is to analyze sepsis and septic shock incidence and their influence on the outcome in critically ill patients with intracranial hemorrhage. Sepsis incidence (33,7%) and septic shock incidence (18,6%) in the patients studied did not depend on intracranial hemorrhage etiology. Septic complications led to higher mortality which was 22,8% in patients with sepsis and 74,4% in patients with septic shock. Sepsis and septic shock risk factors are defined. The problem of sepsis and septic shock diagnosis in critically ill patients with intracranial hemorrhage are highlighted.     

Stress hyperglycemia may not be harmful in critically ill patients with sepsis

Background

Stress hyperglycemia (SH) is commonly seen in critically ill patients. It has been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes in some groups of patients. The effects of SH on critically ill patients with sepsis have not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the effects of SH in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with sepsis admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) over a 5-year period were included.

Results

Of 297 patients, 204 (68.7%) had SH during the study period. The mean blood glucose level in patients with SH was 8.7 mmol/L compared with 5.9 mmol/L in those without SH (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in age; sex; sepsis severity; cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal comorbidities; requirement of mechanical ventilation; inotropes; and Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation III and Simplified Acute Physiology 2 scores on ICU admission. Intensive care unit mortality was significantly lower in patients who had SH. The median duration of ICU and hospital length of stay was longer in patients with SH. On logistic regression analysis, the presence of SH was associated with reduced ICU mortality. Subgroup analysis revealed SH to be protective in patients with septic shock.

Conclusion

Stress hyperglycemia may not be harmful in critically ill patients with sepsis. Patients with SH had lower ICU mortality.     

Plasma levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor are elevated in patients with severe sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) as a marker of severity of systemic inflammation in patients with severe sepsis and critically ill postsurgical patients. DESIGN: Prospective observational study in consecutive patients with severe sepsis, critically ill nonseptic postsurgical patients, and healthy blood donors. SETTING: A surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 19 patients with severe sepsis, 18 critically ill nonseptic postsurgical patients, and 10 healthy blood donors. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: MIF plasma levels of patients and participants were measured. Interleukin 6 plasma levels were monitored as a control marker of inflammation. The median MIF plasma level was four to five times higher in patients with severe sepsis (2.70 ng/ml, range 0.31-19.59) and in critically ill nonseptic postsurgical patients (2.43 ng/ml, range 0.49-4.31) than in healthy blood donors (0.56 ng/ml, range 0.16-1.68). MIF plasma levels did not differ between the patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIF serves as a general marker for systemic inflammation in septic and nonseptic acute critical illness, but MIF does not discriminate for severity or differentiate between infectious and noninfectious origins of an acute critical illness.     

Correlation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction determined by low ejection fraction and 30-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The prognostic implications of myocardial dysfunction in patients with sepsis and its association with mortality are controversial. Several tools have been proposed to evaluate cardiac function in these patients, but their usefulness beyond guiding therapy is unclear. We review the value of echocardiographic estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the setting of severe sepsis and/or septic shock and its correlation with 30-day mortality.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic functionality of newly diagnosed LV systolic dysfunction by transthoracic echocardiography on critical ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Results

A search of EMBASE and PubMed, Ovide MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL medical databases yielded 7 studies meeting inclusion criteria reporting on a total of 585 patients. The pooled sensitivity of depressed LVEF for mortality was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-73%), and pooled specificity was 63% (95% CI, 53%-71%). Summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58-0.67). The overall mortality diagnostic odd ratio for septic patients with LV systolic dysfunction was 1.92 (95% CI, 1.27-2.899). Statistical heterogeneity of studies was moderate.

Conclusion

The presence of new LV systolic dysfunction associated with sepsis and defined as low LVEF is neither a sensitive nor a specific predictor of mortality. These findings are limited because of the heterogeneity and underpower of the studies. Further research into this method is warranted.     

The Italian SEPSIS study: Preliminary results on the incidence and evolution of SIRS,sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock

This prospective, multicenter, epidemiological study was carried out in 99 Italian ICUs, distributed throughout the country, from April 1993 to March 1994. In the study, we applied the new ACCP/SCCM classification system for sepsis (SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock) and determined the prevalence, incidence, evolution and outcome of these categories in critically ill patients. The preliminary analysis of 1101 patients showed that on admission SIRS accounted for about half of the diagnoses (52%) with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock accounting for 4.5%, 2.1% and 3% of patients, respectively. Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock more frequently had high SAPS scores than patients without sepsis. Mortality rates were similar in patients with SIRS (26.5%) and without SIRS or infection (24%), but rose to 36% in patients with sepsis, to 52% in those with severe sepsis and to 81.8% in those with septic shock. Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock were more common in patients with medical diagnoses, and neither severe sepsis nor septic shock was observed in trauma patients. With respect to evolution, the incidence of septic shock was progressively higher in patients admitted with more severe “sepsis-related” diagnoses, while only a trivial difference in rates of incidence was observed between SIRS patients and those admitted without SIRS or any septic disorder (nil). The breakdown of the various ACCP/SCCM “sepsis-related” diagnoses at any time during the study was: SIRS in 58% of the population, sepsis in 16.3%, severe sepsis in 5.5% and septic shock in 6.1%. It seems reasonable to expect from the final evaluation of our study answers to the questions raised by the ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference about the correlations between “sepsis-related” diagnosis, severity score, organ dysfunction score and outcome.     

Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study

OBJECTIVE: To better define the incidence of sepsis and the characteristics of critically ill patients in European intensive care units. DESIGN: Cohort, multiple-center, observational study. SETTING: One hundred and ninety-eight intensive care units in 24 European countries. PATIENTS: All new adult admissions to a participating intensive care unit between May 1 and 15, 2002. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic data, comorbid diseases, and clinical and laboratory data were collected prospectively. Patients were followed up until death, until hospital discharge, or for 60 days. Of 3,147 adult patients, with a median age of 64 yrs, 1,177 (37.4%) had sepsis; 777 (24.7%) of these patients had sepsis on admission. In patients with sepsis, the lung was the most common site of infection (68%), followed by the abdomen (22%). Cultures were positive in 60% of the patients with sepsis. The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (30%, including 14% methicillin-resistant), Pseudomonas species (14%), and Escherichia coli (13%). Pseudomonas species was the only microorganism independently associated with increased mortality rates. Patients with sepsis had more severe organ dysfunction, longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and higher mortality rate than patients without sepsis. In patients with sepsis, age, positive fluid balance, septic shock, cancer, and medical admission were the important prognostic variables for intensive care unit mortality. There was considerable variation between countries, with a strong correlation between the frequency of sepsis and the intensive care unit mortality rates in each of these countries. CONCLUSIONS: This large pan-European study documents the high frequency of sepsis in critically ill patients and shows a close relationship between the proportion of patients with sepsis and the intensive care unit mortality in the various countries. In addition to age, a positive fluid balance was among the strongest prognostic factors for death. Patients with intensive care unit acquired sepsis have a worse outcome despite similar severity scores on intensive care unit admission.     

Managing a combined burn trauma disaster in the post-9/11 world: lessons learned from the 2003 West Pharmaceutical plant explosion

At 1:37 pm on January 29, 2003, an explosion occurred at the West Pharmaceutical chemical plant in Kinston, North Carolina. The explosion killed three people at the scene and resulted in more than 30 admissions to area hospitals. The disaster resulted in 10 critically ill burn patients, who were all intubated with inhalation injuries, many with combined burn and trauma injuries. All 10 critically injured patients were admitted to a tertiary care facility 100 miles away with both a Level I trauma center and a verified burn center. Ultimately, 7 of 10 patients survived (a mortality rate of 30%), and none were transferred to another trauma or burn center. This article analyzes the unique challenges that combined burn and trauma patients present during a disaster, critically examines the response to this disaster, describes lessons learned, and presents recommendations that may improve the response to such disasters in the future.     

Alcoholism and critical illness: A review

Alcohol is the most commonly used and abused drug in the world, and alcohol use disorders pose a tremendous burden to healthcare systems around the world. The lifetime prevalence of alcohol abuse in the United States is estimated to be around 18%, and the economic consequences of these disorders are staggering. Studies on hospitalized patients demonstrate that about one in four patients admitted to critical care units will have alcohol-related issues, and unhealthy alcohol consumption is responsible for numerous clinical problems encountered in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Patients with alcohol use disorders are not only predisposed to developing withdrawal syndromes and other conditions that often require intensive care, they also experience a considerably higher rate of complications, longer ICU and hospital length of stay, greater resource utilization, and significantly increased mortality compared to similar critically ill patients who do not abuse alcohol. Specific disorders seen in the critical care setting that are impacted by alcohol abuse include delirium, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, trauma, and burn injuries. Despite the substantial burden of alcohol-induced disease in these settings, critical care providers often fail to identify individuals with alcohol use disorders, which can have significant implications for this vulnerable population and delay important clinical interventions.     

Procalcitonin as a diagnostic test for sepsis in critically ill adults and after surgery or trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the accuracy of serum procalcitonin as a diagnostic test for sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock in adults in intensive care units or after surgery or trauma, alone and compared with C-reactive protein. To draw and compare the summary receiver operating characteristics curves for procalcitonin and C-reactive protein from the literature. DATA SOURCE: MEDLINE (keywords: procalcitonin, intensive care, sepsis, postoperative sepsis, trauma); screening of the literature. STUDY SELECTION: Meta-analysis of all 49 published studies in medical, surgical, or polyvalent intensive care units or postoperative wards. Children, medical patients, and immunocompromised patients were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Thirty-three studies fulfilled inclusion criteria (3,943 patients, 1,828 males, 922 females; mean age: 56.1 yrs; 1,825 patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock; 1,545 with only systemic inflammatory response syndrome); eight studies could not be analyzed statistically. Global mortality rate was 29.3%. DATA SYNTHESIS: Global odds ratios for diagnosis of infection complicated by systemic inflammation were 15.7 for the 25 studies (2,966 patients) using procalcitonin (95% confidence interval, 9.1-27.1) and 5.4 for the 15 studies (1,322 patients) using C-reactive protein (95% confidence interval, 3.2-9.2). The summary receiver operating characteristics curve for procalcitonin was better than for C-reactive protein. In the 15 studies using both markers, the Q* value (intersection of summary receiver operating characteristics curve with the diagonal line where sensitivity equals specificity) was significantly higher for procalcitonin than for C-reactive protein (0.78 vs. 0.71, p = .02), the former test showing better accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin represents a good biological diagnostic marker for sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock, difficult diagnoses in critically ill patients. Procalcitonin is superior to C-reactive protein. Procalcitonin should be included in diagnostic guidelines for sepsis and in clinical practice in intensive care units.     

Sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy

Sepsis is the leading cause of death in critically ill patients in the United States. Improvements in the critical care management of septic shock have led to a decrease in the mortality rate in the past decade. Septic shock in obstetric patients is rare. Pregnant women as a group are younger and have fewer comorbid conditions. Though little is known regarding the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy, the same principles and treatment modalities discussed in this article should govern the management of pregnant women.     

The impact of the severity of sepsis on the risk of hypoglycaemia and glycaemic variability

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to assess the relation between glycaemic control and the severity of sepsis in a cohort of patients treated with intensive insulin therapy (IIT).

Methods

In a prospective, observational study, all patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 191) with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock were treated with IIT (target blood glucose (BG) level 80 to 140 mg/dl instead of strict normoglycaemia). BG values were analysed by calculating mean values, rate of BG values within different ranges, rate of patients experiencing BG values within different levels and standard deviation (SD) of BG values as an index of glycaemic variability.

Results

The number of patients with hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia was highly dependent on the severity of sepsis (critical hypoglycaemia ≤ 40 mg/dl: sepsis: 2.1%, severe sepsis: 6.0%, septic shock: 11.5%, p = 0.1497; hyperglycaemia: >140 mg/dl: sepsis: 76.6%, severe sepsis: 88.0%, septic shock: 100%, p = 0.0006; >179 mg/dl: sepsis: 55.3%, severe sepsis: 73.5%, septic shock: 88.5%, p = 0.0005; >240 mg/dl: sepsis: 17.0%, severe sepsis: 48.2%, septic shock: 45.9%, p = 0.0011). Multivariate analyses showed a significant association of SD levels with critical hypoglycaemia especially for patients in septic shock (p = 0.0197). In addition, SD levels above 20 mg/dl were associated with a significantly higher mortality rate relative to those with SD levels below 20 mg/dl (24% versus 2.5%, p = 0.0195).

Conclusions

Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who were given IIT had a high risk of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. Among these patients even with a higher target BG level, IIT mandates an increased awareness of the occurrence of critical hypoglycaemia, which is related to the severity of the septic episode.     

Tumor necrosis factor gene polymorphism and septic shock in surgical infection

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship of the genotype distribution of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha polymorphism with regard to the plasma TNF-alpha concentration and the development of septic shock as well as mortality of infected patients in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU). DESIGN: A total of 112 postoperative critically ill infected patients were prospectively enrolled. SETTING: SICU of a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. PATIENTS: Patients who were consecutively admitted to the SICU because of surgical infection with sepsis. INTERVENTION: Blood sampling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood sample was obtained 24 hrs after intensive care unit (ICU) admission or within 2 hrs after the onset of septic shock to determine the plasma TNF-alpha level and to analyze the genotype of the biallelic polymorphism of the TNF-alpha. RESULTS: The allele frequency of the TNF2 in our infected ICU patients was 12%. Forty-two (37.5%) patients admitted fulfilled the criteria of septic shock during their ICU stay. Patients carrying the TNF2 allele were not more likely to develop septic shock, nor did they have a higher mortality rate. In the patients with septic shock, those carrying the TNF2 allele had a significantly higher mortality rate than those with the homozygous TNF1 genotype (92% vs. 62%, p < .05). In those who developed septic shock, the TNF2 allele was significantly associated with higher TNF levels. CONCLUSION: In patients admitted to SICU with surgical infection, the frequency of TNF2 allele was higher than in the general population. SICU patients with TNF2 allele did not show a higher incidence of developing septic shock, nor was there a higher baseline TNF-alpha level after infection. However, once septic shock had developed, the mortality rate was higher in those patients carrying the TNF2 allele.     

Effect of critical illness polyneuropathy on the withdrawal from mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in septic patients

OBJECTIVES: No previous study has demonstrated whether critical illness polyneuropathy itself lengthens mechanical ventilation or whether this prolonged duration of ventilatory support is explained by concomitant risk factors for weaning failure. Our objectives were to evaluate the impact of critical illness polyneuropathy on the length of mechanical ventilation after controlling for coexisting risk factors for weaning failure and to assess the impact of critical illness polyneuropathy on the length of the stay in a cohort of septic patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: All patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who required mechanical ventilation for > or =7 days who were considered ready to discontinue mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent a neurophysiologic evaluation at onset of weaning from mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-four critically ill septic patients were enrolled, and 34 developed critical illness polyneuropathy (53.1%; 95% confidence interval, 40.2-65.7%). Length of mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in patients who had developed critical illness polyneuropathy (median 34 days vs. 14 days, p < .001). The duration of the weaning period was also significantly greater in patients with critical illness polyneuropathy (median 15 days vs. 2 days, p < .001) even though factors suspected to influence the weaning process did not differ between these two groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that critical illness polyneuropathy was the only risk factor independently associated with weaning failure (odds ratio, 15.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.55, 52.3; p < .001). Lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays were significantly higher in patients with critical illness polyneuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill septic patients, critical illness polyneuropathy significantly increases the duration of mechanical ventilation and prolongs the lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays.     

Implementing the severe sepsis care bundles outside the ICU by outreach

Sepsis is not a new challenge facing the health care team, it remains a complex disease, which is difficult to identify and treat. Mortality from sepsis remains high and continues to be a common cause of death among critically ill patients, despite advances in critical care. Sepsis accounts for an estimated 27% of all intensive care admissions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and accounted for 46% of all intensive care bed days. Recent research studies and the surviving sepsis campaign have shown that identifying and providing key interventions to patients with severe sepsis and septic shock prior to their admission to the intensive care unit significantly improve outcomes. The aim of this paper was to identify how the Critical Care Outreach Team at one local hospital implemented the severe sepsis resuscitation care bundle for patients in the emergency department (ED) and on the general wards. It will include a presentation on the various ways the team raised the profile of severe sepsis and the care bundle at hospital and at national level. It also includes audit data that have been collected. The results showed that if the resuscitation care bundle was implemented within the first 24 h of hospital admission, mortality was 29%, whereas if the care bundle was instigated after this time mortality was more than at 49%. Audit data showed that the commonest sign of severe sepsis seen in patients in the ED and on wards was tachypnoea. This article discusses the successful implementation of the severe sepsis resuscitation care bundle and the positive impact an Outreach team can have in changing practice in the way patients are managed with severe sepsis. The audit data support the need for regular physiological observations and the use of a Patient At Risk Trigger scoring tool to identify patients at risk of deterioration. This allows referral to the Outreach team, who assess the patient and if appropriate initiate the care bundle.     

The value of correlation of serum 20S proteasome concentration and percentage of lymphocytic apoptosis in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study

Introduction

Sepsis in critically ill patients is almost associated with bad prognosis and its early detection may improve the prognosis. However, it is difficult to monitor the immunological state of these patients depending on the traditional markers of infection or inflammatory mediators. Accelerated lymphocyte death may reflect good idea about the prognosis especially when combined with 20S proteasome determinations, a recently discovered marker for muscle degradation in patients with sepsis. The hypothesis of the present study is to evaluate the role of serum 20S proteasome at early diagnosis of sepsis and its correlation with lymphocyte apoptosis to predict prognosis and consequently the early interference in critically ill patients suffering from a broad range of diseases in the intensive care unit.

Methods

Sixty-seven critically ill adult intensive care patients were divided into two groups, 32 septic critically ill patients (sepsis group) and 35 non-septic critically ill patients (non-sepsis group), in addition to 33 apparently healthy subjects from the out patient clinic (control group). Patients were tested for serum values of 20S proteasome using ELISA and for percentage of lymphocyte death using annexin V and 7-aminoactinomycin D dye by flow cytometry.

Results

Measured median value of serum 20S proteasome was significantly higher in septic patients compared with both the non-septic and control groups. A significant increase in the percentage of apoptotic lymphocytes was detected in septic patients when compared with the non-sepsis and control groups. The correlation of both 20S proteasome and percentage of apoptotic lymphocytes was found to be significantly positive in both septic and non-septic patients.

Conclusions

The correlation of median values of 20S proteasome and the percentage of apoptotic lymphocyte median values could be a good indicator of patient prognosis and survival in critically ill patients.     

Admission plasma levels of the neuronal injury marker neuron-specific enolase are associated with mortality and delirium in sepsis

PurposeNeuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentrations are prognostic following traumatic and anoxic brain injury and may provide a method to quantify neuronal injury in other populations. We determined the association of admission plasma NSE concentrations with mortality and delirium in critically ill septic patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 124 patients from a larger sepsis cohort. Plasma NSE was measured in the earliest blood draw at intensive care unit admission. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and intensive care unit delirium determined by chart review.ResultsSixty-one patients (49.2%) died within 30 days, and delirium developed in 34 (31.5%) of the 108 patients who survived at least 24 hours and were not persistently comatose. Each doubling of the NSE concentration was associated with a 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-12.0, P= .003) increased risk of 30-day mortality and a 5.2% (95% CI 3.2-7.2, P< .001) increased risk of delirium. An NSE concentration >12.5 μg/L was independently associated with a 23.3% (95% CI 6.7-39.9, P= .006) increased risk of 30-day mortality and a 29.3% (95% CI 8.8-49.8, P= .005) increased risk of delirium.ConclusionsHigher plasma NSE concentrations were associated with mortality and delirium in critically ill septic patients, suggesting that NSE may have utility as a marker of neuronal injury in sepsis.     

Incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care patients: the influence of patient gender on disease process and outcome

Objective: Laboratory studies demonstrated significant detrimental effects of male sex-steroids (testosterone) on immune functions following hemorrhagic shock and soft-tissue trauma. Moreover, better survival of female mice subjected to severe sepsis was observed when compared to male animals. The aims of the present study were to evaluate whether or not gender differences regarding incidence and mortality of severe sepsis do exist in surgical intensive care patients and to elucidate the influence of patient age on incidence and mortality of severe sepsis/septic shock.¶Design: Data base review of prospectively collected data from surgical intensive care patients.¶Setting: Surgical intensive care unit of the department of surgery of a university hospital.¶Patients: Prospectively collected data of 4218 intensive care patients (2709 male, 1509 female).¶Results: Significantly fewer female patients were referred to the intensive care unit (6.6 % vs 10.8 % of all patients; P < 0.05) leading to a significantly smaller proportion of female intensive care patients (35.8 % vs 64.2 %). No gender differences regarding number of failing organs or surgical procedure (exception vascular surgery) were observed in patients with and without severe sepsis/septic shock, indicating that the patients studied are comparable regarding general health prior to admission to SICU. Among all female patients referred to SICU only 7.6 % developed severe sepsis/septic shock, while 10.4 % of all male patients suffered from severe sepsis or septic shock (P < 0.05). This gender difference results from a significantly lower incidence of severe sepsis/septic shock in female patients between 60 and 79 years. No gender difference regarding mortality rates of severe sepsis/septic shock was observed (men 64.9 %, women 65.5 %).¶Conclusions: Our results indicate a significantly smaller number of female patients requiring intensive care as well as a significantly lower incidence of severe sepsis/septic shock in female intensive care patients. Mortality from severe sepsis/septic shock, however, is not affected by gender.     

Mortality and quality of life in the five years after severe sepsis

Introduction

Severe sepsis is associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality, placing a high burden on healthcare resources. We aimed to study outcomes in the five years after severe sepsis.

Methods

This was a cohort study using data from a prospective audit in 26 adult ICUs in Scotland. Mortality was measured using clinical databases and quality of life using Short Form 36 (SF-36) at 3.5 and 5 years after severe sepsis.

Results

A total of 439 patients were recruited with a 58% mortality at 3.5 years and 61% mortality at 5 years. A total of 85 and 67 patients responded at 3.5 and 5 years follow-up, respectively. SF-36 physical component score (PCS) was low compared to population controls at 3.5 years (mean 41.8 (SD 11.8)) and at 5 years (mean 44.8 (SD 12.7)). SF-36 mental component score (MCS) was slightly lower than population controls at 3.5 years (mean 47.7 (SD 14.6)) and at 5 years after severe sepsis (mean 48.8 (SD 12.6)). The majority of patients were satisfied with their current quality of life (QOL) (80%) and all patients would be willing to be treated in an ICU again if they become critically ill despite many having unpleasant memories (19%) and recall (29%) of ICU events.

Conclusions

Patients with severe sepsis have a high ongoing mortality after severe sepsis. They also have a significantly lower physical QOL compared to population norms but mental QOL scores were only slightly below population norms up to five years after severe sepsis. All survivors would be willing to be treated in an ICU again if critically ill. Mortality and QOL outcomes were broadly similar to other critically ill cohorts throughout the five years of follow-up.     

成人严重感染与感染性休克血流动力学监测及支持指南(草案)

严重感染(severe sepsis)及其相关的感染性休克(septic shock)和多器官功能障碍综合征(multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,MODS)是当前重症加强治疗病房(ICU)的主要死亡原因,也是当代重症医学面临的主要焦点及难点。在美国,每年有75万的严重感染病例发生,超过了充血性心力衰竭或乳腺癌、结肠癌和艾滋病的患病数总和,病死率在20%～63%左右,与急性心肌梗死的院外病死率相近,而且患病率以每年1.5%的比例增长,预计到2010年和2020年,严重感染的患病人数将达到93万和110万。美国每年的相关治疗