Bone assessment in elderly women: what does a low bone ultrasound result tell us about bone mineral density?

Access to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can prove difficult for frail or elderly patients, and bone ultrasound may offer a practical alternative. Even after adjustment for bone mineral density (BMD), ultrasound readings are able to predict hip fracture in elderly women. We consider how bone ultrasound might contribute to bone assessment in a clinical setting. DXA remains the gold standard for bone assessment, with osteoporosis defined as a BMD result more than 2.5 S.D. below the young adult mean. Using an equivalent approach we defined an osteoporotic ultrasound result as broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA)<54 dB/MHz. In 73 women aged 29-86 (mean 65) years DXA was used to measure BMD at lumbar spine and hip, and ultrasound to measure BUA at the heel. Correlation of BUA with BMD at femoral neck (r=0.64, P<0.001), and lumbar spine (r=0.55, P<0.001) was consistent with previously reported figures for this ultrasound system. All subjects with BUA below the 54 dB/MHz threshold value were shown to have low femoral neck BMD. Women (42%) aged over 65, but only 18% of younger women had low BUA results. In women over 65 years of age measurements of BUA achieved a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 100% in prediction of low femoral neck BMD. Although a normal BUA did not exclude an osteoporotic BMD result at hip or lumbar spine, a low BUA appeared a highly specific predictor of low BMD at these sites. Since all those women identified as having a low BUA at the heel also had low BMD results, ultrasound appeared to identify a subgroup of elderly patients at a very high risk of fracture.     

Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, bone ultrasound and mineral density in post-menopausal women

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bone structure, geometry and mineral content represent complex traits with a significant heritable component. However, the specific contributing genes have not been unambiguously identified. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to analyse an association between heel ultrasound measurements, partly reflecting bone quality, and VDR (Vitamin D receptor) gene polymorphisms in post-menopausal women, and to assess whether these associations differ from those of bone density or not. METHODS: BUA (broadband ultrasound attenuation, dB/MHz) at the right heel and BMD (bone mineral density, g/cm2) at the lumbar spine and hip were measured in 114 post-menopausal women of Caucasian origin (62.4 +/- 9.8 years). All probands were genotyped for common VDR polymorphisms--FokI, BsmI, Apal and TaqI--by restriction analysis of the PCR product. RESULTS: ANCOVA revealed significant associations between calcaneal BUA adjusted for BMI (body mass index) and YSM (years since menopause), and BsmI, Apal and TaqI genotypes in the VDR gene (p < 0.02; p < 0.0003; p < 0.02 ANCOVA, respectively). BMI- and YSM-adjusted BMD was significantly associated with Fokl genotypes in the VDR gene (p < 0.028 at lumbar spine, p < 0.007 at hip). CONCLUSIONS: The present data show that post-menopausal BMD and BUA are determined by different polymorphisms within the VDR gene. Non-coding polymorphisms in the 3' end of the VDR gene (BsmI, Apal, TaqI) are related to heel ultrasound while the FokI polymorphism in exon 2, located at the opposite site of the VDR gene, is associated with BMD measurements. Further studies are required to determine whether different polymorphic markers within a single gene independently determine various components of post-menopausal bone.     

Bone density, ultrasound measurements and body composition in early ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVES: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated bone density using both dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques and examined the changes in body composition in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Seventy-one patients were compared with seventy-one sex- and age-matched controls. Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated at the lumbar spine and femoral neck with a Lunar device. Total body measurements were also performed, giving BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of the whole body, and fat and lean masses. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound and stiffness were measured at the calcaneus using an Achilles ultrasound device. RESULTS: The patients had significantly lower lumbar spine, femoral neck and total body BMD as compared with controls (all P < 0.05). Total body BMC was also decreased in AS (P = 0.002). On the contrary, fat and lean masses did not differ between patients and controls as observed for QUS values. Mild to good correlations were found between BMD and QUS parameters (r ranging from 0.22 to 0.53; all P < or = 0.01). When applying the World Health Organization (WHO) definition for osteoporosis, we found that 46.5% of patients had lumbar spine osteopenia and/or osteoporosis, while 26.8% had femoral neck osteopenia and/or osteoporosis (controls: 23.9 and 10%; P = 0.001 and 0.08, respectively). No relationships between disease activity (as evaluated by erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein levels and BASDAI, a clinical index of disease activity) and BMD measurements were found and only femoral neck BMD correlated with disease duration (r = -0.25; P = 0.04). Finally, the presence of talalgia in AS did not influence the QUS values. CONCLUSION: These results confirm that AS patients have decreased BMD values at both the spine and femur, and also in total body measurements, reflecting a generalized bone loss. On the contrary, soft tissue composition does not seem to be influenced by the disease. QUS parameters were found to be similar between patients and controls, suggesting that the QUS method did not provide additive information to DEXA. As it is thought that QUS provides information about qualitative properties of bone, the normal results of QUS values in our patient series argue against modifications in AS bone micro-architecture.     

Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry is not a useful tool to screen patients with inflammatory bowel disease at high risk for metabolic bone disease

BACKGROUND: Up to 42% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have significant metabolic bone disease. The current method of screening for osteopenia or osteoporosis involves dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This is relatively costly and involves radiation exposure. What is needed is a safe, inexpensive, and quick screening tool to identify patients who would benefit from DXA testing. This would reduce the number of patients undergoing DXA testing unnecessarily. We tried to determine if calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry is a useful tool in screening high-risk patients with IBD for metabolic bone disease. METHODS: Patients with IBD who presented to the clinic between August 29, 2003 and December 22, 2003 were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry screening using a GE Lunar Achilles Insight quantitative ultrasound densitometry machine (QUS). Patients who were at high risk for significant metabolic bone disease (i.e., significant previous prednisone use or a long history of severe IBD) or who had a T-score on QUS less than or equal to -0.7 had DXA testing performed. The DXA results and QUS results were compared. The radiologist was blinded to the results of QUS. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients with IBD were enrolled. Fifty (40%) were considered high risk for metabolic bone disease. This cohort was comprised of 29 men (58%), of which 21 (73%) had Crohn's disease (CD). Eighty percent of this high-risk group had CD, and in both groups, the majority had used corticosteroids. The overall risk of significant metabolic bone disease in this high-risk group was 62% (DXA < or = -1.0). Heel density (T-score) correlated poorly with DXA (T-score) at either hip or spine at 0.40 even when 2 outlier patients (QUS = -2.9, DXA spine = 0.7, DXA hip = 0.8 and QUS = -3.6, DXA spine = -3, DXA hip = -4) were excluded. Likewise, no association in osteopenia or osteoporosis was seen between multiple variables. These included sex, disease type (ulcerative colitis or CD), smoking, and prior intestinal resection. The sensitivity of QUS to identify patients with significant metabolic bone disease was 74%, and specificity was 63%. A positive predictive value of 81% and negative predictive value of 53% were also less than ideal. The Altman-Bland analysis showed that the agreement between QUS and DXA was poor (-2.0, 2.1). Based on this analysis, QUS cannot replace DXA in the individual patient with IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry is not a useful tool to screen high-risk patients with IBD for metabolic bone disease.     

Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

Due to its low cost, portability, and nonionizing radiation, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel is an alternative to the measurement with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the evaluation of bone status. The objective of the study is to compare in asymptomatic postmenopausal women the ability of QUS and DXA to discriminate between those with and without prevalent vertebral fractures (VFs). The study cohort consists of a population of 295 postmenopausal women aged between 60 and 84 (mean age, weight and BMI of 66.3 years, 72.0 kg and 29.4 kg/m², respectively). Lateral VFA images and scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were obtained by two technologists using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer. VFs were defined using a combination of Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry. All women had a calcaneous QUS examination. The mean age of the women in our sample was 66.3 (±5.3) years, ranging from 60 to 84 years. Eighty-seven (29.3%) women had VFs Genant grade 2 and 3. Patients with VFs had an age and a number of years of menopause higher to those without VFs, but showed lower height, weight, and BMI. All densitometric and ultrasonometric measurements were significantly reduced in women with VFs. The intercorrelations of BMD at different sites were high, and the correlations of BUA with BMD were lower. BUA correlated weakly with total hip BMD (r = 0.36), lumbar spine BMD (r = 0.32), and much less with femur BMD (r = 0.30); all correlations were significant (P < 0.01). Analysis of the AUC for the ROC curves showed lumbar spine T-score below −2.5 to provide consistently the highest AUC (0.64). Age-adjusted ORs after correction for confounding variables (years of menopause, weight, height, and BMI) for QUS and BMD measurements showed that only lumbar spine T-score below −2.5 could predict significantly the presence of VFs (OR, 1.94; 95%CI, 1.02–3.41). Lumbar spine BMD (and not QUS) was able to discriminate asymptomatic postmenopausal women with prevalent VFs from women without VFs and independently contributed to determining the association with fracture. The combination of QUS and BMD did not improve the diagnostic ability of either individual technique.     

Poor correlations between measurements of bone quality by quantitative ultrasound sonography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with beta-thalassaemia major

Objectives: Osteopenia/osteoporosis is a major component of morbidity even in young patients with β‐thalassaemia major. Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference method for determining bone mineral density (BMD). Quantitative ultrasound sonography (QUS) for bone measurement is a relatively new, inexpensive and radiation‐free method that could serve as an alternative to DXA. Our aim was to assess bone status in thalassaemic patients both with QUS and DXA and, consequently, to investigate the degree of correlation between the two methods. Methods: Thirty‐three patients (15 male and 18 female) with β‐thalassaemia major, regularly transfused and systematically iron‐chelated, participated in the study. Mean age was 22.0 ± 8.0 yr (range: 6.5–41.0 yr). All patients were evaluated with QUS at radius and tibia and had DXA scan at lumbar spine vertebrae (L2–L4), whereas 20 patients were additionally assessed with DXA at the left hip (femoral neck, trochanter region and Ward’s triangle). Results: Results were expressed as Z‐scores compared with sex‐ and age‐matched population. Lowest mean Z‐scores measured with DXA were recorded at lumbar spine and Ward’s triangle (?1.1 ± 1.13 and ?0.95 ± 1.07, respectively). Lowest mean QUS‐derived Z‐scores were measured at radius, statistically significant compared with Z‐scores measured at tibia (?0.6 ± 1.1 vs. 0.4 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). QUS measurements at radius were significantly correlated to QUS measurements at tibia (r = 0.51, P = 0.002). The latter were correlated to BMD measured at lumbar spine (r = 0.516, P = 0.002) and at trochanter region (r = 0.646, P = 0.003). All BMD measurements at hip were significantly correlated to each other. Lumbar spine BMD was correlated to BMD at femoral neck (r = 0.607, P = 0.003) and to BMD at Ward’s triangle (r = 0.438, P = 0.027). Finally, no agreement was recorded between the two methods in identifying thalassaemic patients at risk for osteoporosis (κ = 0.203, P = 0.04). Conclusion: Quantitative ultrasound sonography could not serve as an alternate to DXA.     

Quantitative ultrasound assessment of bone

In the last two decades, several non-invasive techniques have been developed to measure bone density at axial and peripheral skeletal sites. The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technique allows accurate measurement of bone density, but does not provide information about the structural and qualitative features of bone, which play an important role in fracture risk determination. Increasing interest in quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) has recently developed; it may be considered a safe and quite inexpensive diagnostic technique. Ultrasound devices routinely measure two parameters: broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS). Two other parameters, stiffness and index of consistency (QUI), can be derived from BUA and SOS. SOS is influenced by the elasticity of bone as well as by its density. BUA is determined by mechanisms of diffraction, scattering and absorption in the bone, marrow and soft tissue. Absorption predominates in cortical bone and scattering in trabecular bone. BUA is a measure of the approximately linear frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation. Several QUS devices are now available for clinical use for measuring various parameters at skeletal sites with different contents of trabecular and cortical bone. Standardization of instruments is one of the major limitations of this technique today. Many studies have demonstrated that BUA and SOS, measured at any level, can discriminate normal subjects from osteoporotic patients. Moreover, there is evidence documenting the ability of QUS to predict osteoporotic fracture risk and to give further BMD-independent information on bone. QUS at the heel can now be considered as an alternative technique to identify subjects with a high risk of bone fragility. Further studies are needed for better definition of the role of QUS in clinical practice.     

The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry

The aim of this study was to establish whether quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters could identify patients classified as osteoporotic and osteopenic on the basis of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). One hundred and twenty-three patients (39 male, 84 female) with osteoporosis and suspected of having osteoporosis were included in this study. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) were measured and bone mineral densities (BMD) of the lumbar spine and left hip was measured by DEXA. Subjects were classified into three groups (normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic) on the basis of BMD T-scores measured by DEXA. QUS parameters of the osteoporotic group were significantly lower than those of osteopenic and normal groups; there was no difference in QUS parameters between the normal and osteopenic groups. Correlations of both right and left SOS and BUA with the spine and femoral neck BMD were moderate (r = 0.343-0.539, P < 0.001). There was also reasonable correlation between DEXA and QUS T-scores (r = 0.364-0.510, P < 0.001). QUS had a sensitivity of 21% and a specificity of 95% for diagnosing osteoporosis. We concluded that, although DEXA and QUS parameters were significantly correlated, QUS parameters can not predict osteopenia as defined by DEXA, and sensitivities and specificities of QUS parameters were not sufficiently high for QUS to be used as an alternative to DEXA.     

Ultrasound measurements of calcaneus for estimation of skeletal status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing metabolic bone disease. In diagnosing osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements play a key role. Our aims in this study were to assess the skeletal status with quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and to evaluate the ability of this method to predict BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in IBD patients. METHODS: Altogether 53 patients with Crohn disease (CD) and 57 with ulcerative colitis (UC) were studied by using a Lunar Achilles ultrasound bone densitometer. The ultrasound variables are broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS). The lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body BMD were measured with DXA. The age- and sex-adjusted values (Z-scores) were obtained by comparison with age- and sex-matched normal values. RESULTS: In CD patients Z-scores for both BUA and SOS were significantly less than zero, and Z-score for SOS was significantly lower than that for UC patients. Z-scores for BMD measured with DXA were significantly lower at all measurements in patients with CD. QUS and DXA measurements were significantly correlated. However, the agreement between the measurements in each individual patient was poor. Body mass index (BMI) was a major determinant for both BUA and SOS. In CD patients low QUS variables were associated with corticosteroid therapy, and both CD and UC patients with previous fractures had low SOS values. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that QUS and DXA are not interchangeable methods for estimation of bone status. QUS variables are insufficient to provide accurate prediction of BMD values and should therefore not be recommended as a screening test for osteoporosis in IBD patients.     

Multi-site quantitative ultrasound compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in rheumatoid arthritis: effects of body mass index and inflamed soft tissue on reproducibility

The objective of the study is to evaluate multi-site quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) considering the effects of body mass index (BMI) and disease activity on measurements in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Sixty-eight patients underwent a cross-sectional analysis of bone mineral density measured by DXA (lumbar spine, total femur) and speed of sound estimated by QUS (phalanx III, distal radius). The short-term precision of QUS was investigated with regard to BMI of healthy individuals and with regard to the level of disease activity in patients suffering from RA. The patients with RA were divided into two BMI groups as well as into low and advanced disease activity groups. The short-term precision of QUS–SOS ranged from 0.90 to 2.55% (healthy controls) and from 0.64 to 1.89% (patients with RA). The association between DXA and QUS parameters were limited in the case of advanced disease activity and pronounced BMI. Low QUS–SOS was observed for advanced disease activity group (QUS–SOS phalanx: −2.5%; QUS–SOS distal radius: −2.1%) in comparison to low disease activity group, whereas only a slight change of DXA parameters was observed. DXA–BMD and QUS parameters revealed higher values with pronounced BMI. The system shows only a short-term precision with limitations in healthy controls with accentuated BMI, as well as in patients with active RA. The application of multi-site QUS seems to be restricted for patients with active inflammation based on soft tissue alteration in RA and for healthy individuals with pronounced body mass.     

Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry in inflammatory bowel disease—a comparison with double X-ray densitometry of the lumbar spine

Objective: The aim of this study was to measure ultrasound (US) densitometric parameters [Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation (BUA), Speed of Sound (SOS), and stiffness of the os calcis] in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to compare the results with those obtained with conventional x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine.
Methods: Twenty-two patients with Crohn's disease (13 with ileal and nine with ileocolonic disease), 11 patients with ulcerative colitis (eight with left-sided and three with pancolitis), and 18 healthy controls. US densitometry of the right heel and DXA of the lumbar spine were performed within the same day.
Results: Compared to controls, IBD patients had significantly lower values with both methods, US and DXA. Forty-nine percent of patients had a lumbar T score below −1. Calcaneal SOS and stiffness of these patients were significantly reduced (   p < 0.03  and   p < 0.05  , respectively). Positive significant correlations were found between lumbar DXA and calcaneal US parameters. Lumbar bone density and calcaneal US stiffness correlated inversely with the lifetime prednisone intake (   p < 0.03  and   p < 0.05  , respectively), but not with age or duration of disease. A cut-off level of 80 dB/MHz for calcaneal BUA predicted axial osteopenia correctly in 74%, but some underestimation of spinal BMD was observed, especially in female patients with Crohn's disease.
Conclusions: US evaluation of the os calcis gives results similar to those of conventional DXA and therefore may be used for screening IBD patients for axial osteoporosis. Because US does not expose patients to radiation, repeated measurements are possible and may be used to assess short term variations and the effect of treatment of IBD-associated bone disease.     

Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients

To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1–L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (P > .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was –1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (P < .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was –2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is –1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤–2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis.     

Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been claimed as an alternative technique for risk assessment of hip fractures associated with osteoporosis. However, reports concerning modest correlations between QUS parameters and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in women raise questions about the reliability of QUS technology to predict bone mineral density (BMD). Partially, the lack of stronger correlations may be due to heterogeneity in bone architecture deterioration which may be more pronounced in older than in younger women. Therefore, it was thought important to study QUS/DXA interrelationships in subgroups of pre- and postmenopausal women. METHODS: We studied 217 pre- and postmenopausal women between the ages of 25 and 75 years, who were referred for a BMD measurement because of osteoporosis in at least one family member either in the first or in the second degree. All women had a calcaneal QUS and a DXA measurement at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck. RESULTS: The linear regression coefficients between the QUS parameters broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) and DXA at the various sites in the group as a whole were 0.53 to 0.54 (P<0.0001). Significantly lower regression coefficients between BUA and DXA at the total hip and the femoral neck were found in premenopausal women (r=0.31 and 0.38, P<0.0001) compared to postmenopausal women (r=0.56 and 0.53, P<0.0001). For SOS there was no significant difference between the regression coefficients in the pre- and postmenopausal group. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis as assessed by DXA in the total group was 25% (6% in the pre- and 36% in the postmenopausal group). BUA failed to detect osteoporosis in all five premenopausal women but also in 20 out of 50 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. SOS measurements were even worse in this respect. CONCLUSIONS: Linear regression coefficients between calcaneal QUS parameters and DXA are only modest considering a group of 25--75-year-old Dutch women. In the subgroup of premenopausal women correlations between BUA and BMD at the hip and femoral neck are worse compared to those in postmenopausal women. The predictive value of QUS parameters for BMD is limited, therefore it is not appropriate to use QUS as a surrogate for DXA.     

Differences between measurements of bone mineral densities by quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women

CONTEXT: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) may be more helpful than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in detecting bone deficits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare differences in bone mass measurement by DXA and QUS in T2DM and nondiabetic postmenopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This clinical investigation was a cross-sectional study in 76 patients with T2DM and 86 nondiabetic postmenopausal women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were speed of sound (SOS) at the radius, phalanx, and tibia measured by QUS and bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) measured by DXA. RESULTS: BMDs in T2DM patients were higher (LS, 1.06 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.23 g/cm(2); FN, 0.80 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.74 +/- 0.12 g/cm(2); TH, 0.87 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.80 +/- 0.13 g/cm(2), respectively, P < 0.001), whereas SOSs were lower than those in nondiabetics (radius, 4044 +/- 178 vs. 4129 +/- 182 m/sec; phalanx, 3902 +/- 207 vs. 3999 +/- 214 m/sec, respectively, P < 0.001). The positive relationships between SOS and BMD (r = 0.26-0.75, P < 0.05) in nondiabetics were not observed in women with T2DM. T2DM impacted negatively on SOSs (radius, beta= -0.223, P <0.01; phalanx, beta= -0.219, P <0.01) but positively on BMDs (LS, beta = 0.314, P < 0.001; FN, beta = 0.173, P < 0.05; TH, beta = 0.203, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in bone mass as measured by DXA and QUS in postmenopausal T2DM and nondiabetic women do not change in parallel. QUS can provide useful information in the skeletal assessment of patients with T2DM.     

Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density: discriminatory ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls with and without vertebral deformities

BACKGROUND: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a reliable tool for discriminating between subjects with and without vertebral deformities in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Less is known about osteoporosis caused by inflammatory diseases or corticosteroid use. OBJECTIVES: (1). To compare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis the ability of QUS and dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) to discriminate between those with and without vertebral deformities; (2). to explore whether the results are similar in population based controls. METHODS: Standardised lateral radiographs of the spine were obtained from 210 patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged over 50 years and 210 individually matched controls. Vertebral deformities were assessed morphometrically and semiquantitatively. All participants underwent bone measurements by DXA (Lunar Expert) and QUS (Lunar Achilles+). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to compare the discriminating ability of BMD and QUS measurements in patients and controls with and without vertebral deformities. Analyses were repeated in patients stratified according to corticosteroid use. RESULTS: For all bone measurements except lumbar spine in the rheumatoid arthritis group, BMD discriminated significantly between the patients with and without vertebral deformities, and the results were similar to those obtained in controls. Among current corticosteroid users, neither QUS nor DXA could discriminate between subjects with and without vertebral deformities. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support QUS as an alternative tool for identifying patients at risk of having vertebral deformities in rheumatoid arthritis, although results should be interpreted with caution in current users of corticosteroids.     

Discrepancy in bone mineral densities at different skeletal sites in hip osteoarthritis patients

Abstract

Objective. Increased femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) in a hip with osteoarthritis (OA) has been previously reported, however, it is possible that increased BMD at sites other than the hip joint is influenced by the disease process of OA. Therefore, we measured BMD at locations different from the hip joint and determined whether higher BMD was also observed at these different skeletal sites in hip OA patients.

Methods. We measured BMD in 68 women (average age 61.0 years) scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty for end-stage OA and 100 healthy women (average age 60.9 years) as age-matched controls. BMD at the lumbar spine, radius, and calcaneus was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Moreover, we measured speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and stiffness index of the calcaneus by quantitative ultrasonography (QUS).

Results. BMD obtained by DXA at the lumbar spine and radius was significantly higher in hip OA patients than in controls. However, at the calcaneus, no significant differences were observed between the groups in BMD obtained by DXA. SOS, BUA, and stiffness index obtained by QUS were significantly lower in the OA group than in controls.

Conclusion. Higher BMDs of the spine and radius suggest that the incidence of osteoporosis is inversely associated with the incidence of OA. However, it remains unclear whether lack of difference in BMD and lower SOS, BUA, and stiffness index of the calcaneus in the OA group was secondary to the effect walking disturbance resulting from hip pain. Our data suggest that hip OA patients have higher BMD than healthy women, and that inactivity or immobilization caused by hip OA may reduce BMD in the lower limb.     

Quantitative ultrasound of the proximal phalanges and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Crohn's disease patients with osteopenia

Background: Osteopenia and osteoporosis are frequent complications in Crohn's disease, and these features are associated with an increased risk of vertebral and appendicular fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are widely accepted to assess the fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis. In recent years, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has become attractive for the diagnosis of osteopenia as a nonionizing method. The aim of the present study was to investigate QUS and BMD measurements in osteopenic patients with Crohn's disease. Methods: BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck and QUS of proximal phalanges II-V (DBM Sonic 1200; IGEA) were performed prospectively in 171 patients with Crohn's disease. The amplitude-dependent sound-of-speed (AD-SoS) and the ultrasound bone profile score (UBPS) were calculated using the WinSonic PRO 1.1 software program. X-ray examination of the spine was performed in 131 patients. Vertebral deformity was morphometrically defined according to the published methods of McCloskey and Eastell. Results: BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck correlated significantly (r = 0.62), but no correlation between BMD and QUS could be demonstrated. Vertebral deformities (VD) were detected in 28/131 (21.4%) patients. Two patients had a history of femoral fracture (FF). Lumbar BMD was lower in patients with either VD or FF than in those patients with no preexisting fractures (T-score: −2.46 vs −2.04; P = 0.0233). QUS parameters correlated negatively to patients' age but could not be used to discriminate between patients with and without VD/FF. Conclusions: Osteoporosis-related fractures are associated with a low lumbar bone density in Crohn's disease patients. QUS of the proximal phalanges cannot detect manifest osteoporosis in Crohn's disease patients and is therefore not valuable as a screening tool for these patients. Received: January 10, 2002 / Accepted: August 30, 2002 Acknowledgments. Morphometry of vertebral radiographs was supported by the Osteoporosis Study Group of the Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. Reprint requests to: C. von Tirpitz     

Versuch der Differenzierung zwischen kortikoidinduzierter Osteopenie und periartikulärer Demineralisation mit Hilfe der Digitalen Radiogrammetrie (DXR) bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis

PURPOSE: To investigate a new bone densitometric technology based on digital radiogrammetry (DXR) with respect to its ability to measure severity-dependent variations of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and to differentiate between corticoid-induced and periarticular bone mineral density loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 153 randomly selected patients suffering from verified rheumatoid arthritis underwent digitally performed plain radiographs of the non-dominant hand and also measurements of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) regarding total femur and lumbar spine in 102 patients and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) regarding the distal radius in 51 patients. Using DXR the radiographs of the non-dominant hand were analyzed for cortical bone mineral density calculation. The severity was classified in the DXA group using the Ratingen score. Furthermore, both study populations were divided into patients with and without corticoid therapy. RESULTS: Correlations between BMD determined by DXR and by DXA (R=0.44 for lumbar spine and R=0.61 for total femur) versus pQCT (0.46相似文献   

Broadband ultrasound attenuation of the os calcis: Preliminary study

Summary Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) measurements of the calcaneus were performed in 87 healthy subjects and in 17 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In 52 normal subjects, bone mineral densities (BMD) of the lumbar spine were measured by quantitative CT (QCT), and in another group of 15 normal subjects, BMD of the lumbar spine was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BUA showed a negative significant correlation with age (r=0,44; p<0.001), and was more pronounced in women. A significant positive correlation of BUA in the os calcis with lumbar BMD using QCT (r=0,53, p<0,001) or DXA (r=0,81; p<0,001), was observed. We found no significant difference between osteoporotic patients (n=17; mean BUA value: 58.4±18) and controls (n=17; mean BUA value; 61±15). The mean coefficient of variation was high: 6%. These results suggest that BUA is not yet a valuable tool in general clinical practice and that further additional improvements are necessary in order to use it in the management of osteoporosis.     

Dairy calcium intake and lifestyle risk factors for bone loss in hiv-infected and uninfected mediterranean subjects

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Despite the reported high prevalence of osteoporosis in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-population, there have been no previous studies examining dairy calcium intake and bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV-subjects. We assessed the prevalence of low BMD in HIV-infected and uninfected subjects and analyzed the effects of calcium intake, lifestyle and HIV-related risk factors on BMD. METHODS: One hundred and twelve HIV-infected subjects were consecutively enrolled. Seventy- six HIV-uninfected subjects matched for age and sex were enrolled as the control group. The HIV-subjects were interviewed about lifestyle habits and completed a weekly food-frequency questionnaire to estimate calcium intake. HIV-RNA, CD4+ T-cell count and data on antiretroviral therapy were also recorded. Both biochemical bone turnover markers and BMD, assessed by dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry (DXA) were recorded in the HIV-cases and controls. We also calculated the 10-year fracture risks using the WHO FRAX equation. RESULTS: Osteoporosis prevalence was significantly higher in the HIV-cases than controls (p < 0.05). BMI values were positively correlated with BMD (p < 0.05). Vitamin D levels were lower in the HIV-subjects (p < 0.02). No correlation was found with daily calcium intake. BMI values were significantly correlated with dairy intake quartiles (p < 0.003). In HIV-subjects, the mean of FRAX score was 1.2 % for hip and 4.7 % for major osteoporotic fractures. On multivariate analysis of the lumbar spine DXA T-score, age (p < 0.005) and HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infection (p < 0.0001) were negatively correlated with BMD, while yogurt intake was a protective predictor of BMD (p < 0.05). In the femur DXA T-score, age (p < 0.01), nadir CD4 + T-cell count < 200 cells/muL (p < 0.05) and drug addiction ( p < 0.0001) were negatively correlated with BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Among the foods rich in calcium, yogurt was a protective predictor of BMD in HIV-subjects. HIV/HCV co-infection, nadir CD4 + T-cell count < 200 cells/muL and drug addiction were independent predictors of severe BMD. Promoting behavioral changes in food intake and lifestyle, aimed at the primary prevention of bone disease in the chronically-infected subjects seems to be essential for implementing medical intervention in these cases.