Shear stress is required for the endocytic uptake of the factor VIII‐von Willebrand factor complex by macrophages

Summary. Background: Low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family members contribute to the cellular uptake of factor VIII. How von Willebrand factor fits into this endocytic pathway has remained poorly understood. Objectives: It has been suggested that macrophages contribute to the clearance of the factor VIII (FVIII)‐von Willebrand factor (VWF) complex. We now assessed the mechanisms of uptake employing human monocyte‐derived macrophages. Methods: A confocal microscopy study was employed to study the uptake by monocyte‐derived macrophages of a functional green fluorescent FVIII‐GFP derivative in the presence and absence of VWF. Results: The results revealed that FVIII‐GFP is internalized by macrophages. We found that FVIII‐GFP co‐localizes with LDL receptor‐related protein (LRP), and that the LRP antagonist Receptor Associated Protein (RAP) blocks the uptake of FVIII‐GFP. However, FVIII‐GFP was not detected in the macrophages in the presence of VWF, suggesting that the FVIII‐VWF complex is not internalized by these cells at all. Apart from static conditions, we also investigated the effect of shear stress on the uptake of FVIII‐GFP in presence of VWF. Immunofluorescence studies demonstrated that VWF does not block endocytosis of FVIII‐GFP under flow conditions. Moreover, VWF itself was also internalized by the macrophages. Strikingly, in the presence of RAP, endocytosis of FVIII‐GFP and VWF was inhibited. Conclusion: The results show that shear stress is required for macrophages to internalize both constituents of the FVIII‐VWF complex.     

von Willebrand factor propeptide to antigen ratio identifies platelet activation and reduced von Willebrand factor survival phenotype in mice

Essentials

• Reduced survival of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in plasma causes type 1C von Willebrand disease.
• Blood was collected from mouse strains by various methods and VWF propeptide and antigen assayed.
• VWF propeptide to antigen ratio identifies a reduced VWF survival phenotype in mice.
• This ratio validates the acceptability of murine blood samples for coagulation studies.

Summary

Background

Reduced plasma survival of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is characteristic of patients with type 1C von Willebrand disease (VWD). These subjects can be identified by an increased steady‐state ratio of plasma VWF propeptide (VWFpp) to VWF antigen (VWF:Ag). A similar phenotype occurs in mice with the Mvwf1 allele.

Objectives

To (i) determine if the VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio can be used to identify a ‘type 1C’ phenotype in mice, (ii) determine the most reliable method for murine blood sampling, and (iii) identify the source of VWF released during problematic blood collection.

Methods

‘Platelet‐VWF’ and ‘endothelial‐VWF’ mice were generated by bone marrow transplantation between C57BL/6J and VWF‐/‐ mice. Several blood sampling methods were used and murine VWFpp and VWF:Ag levels determined. Plasma and platelet VWF:Ag and VWFpp, VWF multimers and VWF half‐life were examined in mouse strains with and without Mvwf1.

Results

A single retro‐orbital bleed and vena cava collection were found to be the optimal methods of blood collection. Problematic collection resulted in release of VWF from platelets and endothelium. The VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio identified strains of mice with reduced VWF survival.

Conclusion

Assay of murine VWFpp and VWF:Ag has utility in determining the acceptability of murine blood samples for coagulation testing and in identification of a reduced VWF survival phenotype in mice.

     

Purified A2 domain of von Willebrand factor binds to the active conformation of von Willebrand factor and blocks the interaction with platelet glycoprotein Ibα

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand factor (VWF) does not interact with circulating platelets unless it is induced to expose the binding site for platelet glycoprotein (GP)Ibalpha in the A1 domain by high shear stress, immobilization, and/or a modulator. Previous studies have implied indirectly that the A2 domain may be involved in regulating A1-GPIbalpha binding. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Because the relationship between the A1 and A2 domains has not been defined, we have investigated the effect of the A2 domain on the binding activity of the A1 domain using recombinant A domain polypeptides, multimeric VWF, and monoclonal antibodies (mAb). RESULTS: The A2 domain polypeptide bound specifically to the immobilized A1 domain polypeptide or full-length VWF, with half-maximal binding being obtained at 60 or 168 nm, respectively. This A1-A2 interaction was inhibited by mAb against the A2 or A1 domain and by the A1 domain polypeptide. The A2 domain polypeptide effectively blocked GPIbalpha-mediated platelet adhesion under high flow conditions. The A2 domain polypeptide specifically recognizes the GPIbalpha-binding conformation in the A1 domain, as it only interacted with VWF activated by the modulator ristocetin or immobilized VWF. Furthermore, in contrast to plasma VWF, the ultra-large (UL)VWF multimers or a recombinant VWF-A1A2A3 polypeptide containing a gain-of-function mutation (R1308 L) of type 2B von Willebrand disease bound to the A2 domain polypeptide without the need for ristocetin. CONCLUSIONS: The recombinant A2 domain polypeptide specifically binds to the active conformation of the A1 domain in VWF and effectively blocks the interaction with platelet GPIbalpha under high-flow conditions.     

von Willebrand factor assembly and secretion

Summary.  During its life history, von Willebrand factor (VWF) experiences a remarkable sequence of conformational changes that are triggered by differences in pH between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi and extracellular environments. VWF subunits dimerize in the ER and assemble into disulfide-linked multimers in the trans-Golgi, which lacks known chaperones and has an acidic pH that inhibits disulfide rearrangement. VWF has circumvented these problems by evolving N-terminal domains that function as an oxidoreductase at the low pH of the Golgi. VWF multimers also condense into tightly packed, tubular arrays for storage in the Weibel–Palade bodies of endothelial cells. Like multimer assembly, tubular packing depends on low pH and Ca²⁺. Upon secretion, exposure to the neutral pH of the extracellular environment allows enormous VWF multimers to uncoil without tangling, which is crucial for hemostasis. Recent studies have identified some of the biochemical and structural properties that underlie these self-organizing behaviors.     

The platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex anchors lipid rafts to the membrane skeleton: implications for activation-dependent cytoskeletal translocation of signaling molecules

Summary.  Background:  The glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX-V complex attaches platelets to areas of endothelial damage by binding von Willebrand factor (VWF), an interaction that transmits intracellular activation signals. These signals require that the complex associates with both lipid rafts and the membrane cytoskeleton, but it is not clear whether the same GPIb-IX-V subpopulation associates with both structures. Objectives: To determine which subpopulation of GPIb-IX-V associates with lipid rafts, and the consequences of that interaction. Methods:  We analyzed the content of proteins (particularly the GPIb-IX-V complex) and lipids in rafts from detergent lysates of platelets before and after removal of the actin cytoskeleton alone or both the actin cytoskeleton and membrane skeleton (by successive centrifugations of 15 800 ×  g and 100 000 ×  g ). Results:  In unstimulated platelets, little raft-associated GPIb-IX-V sedimented with the actin skeleton; most was removed by sedimentation of the membrane skeleton. The Src family kinase Lyn followed the same pattern. In VWF-activated platelets, almost all of the GPIb-IX-V complex and Lyn in rafts sedimented with the actin cytoskeleton, consistent with a previously described crosslinking of the membrane and actin skeletal structures following platelet activation. Disruption of the GPIbα–filamin linkage with N -ethylmaleimide prevented depletion of raft-associated GPIb-IX-V by skeletal sedimentation. Not all raft-associated proteins and lipids followed this pattern. Conclusion:  These results suggest that the raft association and cytoskeletal linkage of the GPIb-IX-V complex are interrelated, and both are required for optimal receptor function, perhaps because raft association attracts signaling proteins and membrane skeletal association allows these proteins to move en masse to new locations.     

Polyphosphate binds to human von Willebrand factor in vivo and modulates its interaction with glycoprotein Ib

Summary. Background: Polyphosphate, a phosphate polymer released by activated platelets, has recently been described as a potent modulator of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. In blood plasma, polyphosphate binds to and alters the biological functions of factor XII, fibrin(ogen), thrombin and factor VII activating protease. Objectives: The aim of the present study is to investigate whether polyphosphate also binds to von Willebrand factor (VWF) and alters some of its activities. Methods/Results: When studying patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) and their healthy relatives, we discovered a significant correlation between von Willebrand factor (VWF) and platelet polyphosphate levels. We have also found polyphosphate in preparations of VWF isolated from normal platelets and plasma. Surface plasmon resonance and electrophoretic mobility assays indicated that polyphosphate interacts with VWF in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner. Treatment of normal plasma with active exopolyphosphatase decreased the VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity, a functional measure of VWF binding to platelet glycoprotein receptor Ib. VWF collagen binding and multimerization were unaltered after polyphosphate depletion. Moreover, addition of polyphosphate increased the deficient VWF:RCo activity presented by plasma from patients with type 1 VWD. Conclusions: Our results reveal that a new role is played by polyphosphate in hemostasis by its interaction with VWF, and suggest that this polymer may be effective in the treatment of some types of VWD.     

Targeting von Willebrand factor and platelet glycoprotein Ib receptor

Atherothrombotic events, such as acute coronary syndrome or stroke, are the result of platelet activation. Von Willebrand factor (vWF), a multimeric glycoprotein, plays a key role in aggregation of platelets, especially under high-shear conditions. Acting as bridging element or ligand between damaged endothelial sites and the glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) receptor on platelets, vWF is responsible for platelet adhesion and aggregation. This vWF activation and further platelet aggregation mainly occurs under high shear stress present in small arterioles or during deficiency of the vWF-cleaving protease ADAMTS13. There are several substances targeting vWF itself or its binding receptor GPIb on platelets. Two antibodies are directed against vWF: AJW200, an IgG4 humanized monoclonal antibody, and 82D6A3, a monoclonal antibody of the collagen-binding A-3 domain of vWF. ALX-0081 and ALX-0681 are bivalent humanized nanobodies targeting the GPIb binding site of vWF. Aptamers are oligonucleotides with drug-like properties that share some of the attributes of monoclonal antibodies. ARC1779 is a second-generation, nuclease-resistant aptamer, binding to the activated vWF A1 domain and ARC15105 is a chemically advanced follower with an assumed higher affinity to vWF. Antibodies targeting GPIbα are h6B4-Fab, a murine monoclonal antibody; GPG-290, a recombinant, chimeric protein containing the amino-terminal 290 amino acids of GPIbα linked to human IgG1 Fc; and the monoclonal antibody SZ2. There are a number of promising preclinical results and development of some agents (AJW 200, ARC1779 and ALX-0081) has already reached Phase II trials.     

A comparative analysis of different automated von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib‐binding activity assays in well typed von Willebrand disease patients

Essentials

• Von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) is not a completely reliable assay.
• Three automated VWF activity assays were compared within a von Willebrand disease (VWD) cohort.
• Raw values for all three assays were virtually the same.
• An overall problem within type 2A/IIE VWD using VWF:GPIb‐binding activity/VWF:Ag was observed.

Summary

Background

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by quantitative (type 1 and 3) or qualitative (type 2) von Willebrand factor (VWF) defect. VWD diagnosis and classification require numerous laboratory tests. VWF: glycoprotein Ib (GPIb)‐binding activity assays are used to distinguish type 1 from type 2 VWD.

Objectives

Three different automated VWF:GPIb‐binding activity assays were compared.

Patients and methods

BC‐VWF:RCo (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics), HemosIL^® VWF:RCo (Instrumentation Laboratory) and INNOVANCE^® VWF:Ac (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) were performed in a well typed VWD cohort (n = 142).

Results

Based on the three most used VWD parameters (FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIb‐binding activity) and using a cut‐off of <0.70 for type 2 VWD revealed sensitivity and specificity of, respectively, 92% and 72.4% for VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag, 84% and 89.7% for VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag, and 92% and 85.1% for VWF:GPIbM/VWF:Ag, whereas a lowered cut‐off of < 0.60 resulted in reduced sensitivity with increased specificity for all assays.

Conclusion

VWD classification based on FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIb‐binding activity revealed an overall problem with normal VWF:GPIb‐binding activity/VWF:Ag within type 2, especially type 2A/IIE. Although all assays were practically identical, BC‐VWF:RCo had higher %CV compared with both new assays but comparable lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) ~4 IU dL^?1. No clear improved distinction between type 1 and 2 VWD with new assays was seen. BC‐VWF:RCo and HemosIL^® are ristocetin dependent, whereas INNOVANCE^® does not rely upon ristocetin and is not influenced by VWF polymorphisms increasing VWF:GPIb‐binding activity levels. INNOVANCE^® seems to be the best choice as a first‐line VWF:GPIb‐binding activity assay, providing the best balance between sensitivity and specificity for type 2 VWD.

     

Sulfatides inhibit platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor in flowing blood

Summary.  Sulfatides are sulfated glycosphingolipids present on cell surfaces that bind to adhesive proteins such as von Willebrand factor (VWF), P-selectin, laminin and thrombospondin. Previous studies have localized the sulfatide-binding site of VWF to amino acid residues Gln626–Val646 in the A1 domain. The A1 domain also contains the binding site for platelet glycoprotein Ib (GP Ib), a site that has been reported to be distinct from the sulfatide-binding site. In this study, we analyzed the interaction of sulfatides with VWF and its effect on GP Ib-mediated platelet adhesion under flow conditions. Recombinant VWF A1 domain (rVWF-A1) bound specifically and saturably to sulfatides (half-maximal concentration of ∼12.5 µg mL⁻¹), binding that was blocked by dextran sulfate (IC₅₀≈100 µg mL⁻¹) but not by heparin at concentrations up to 100 U mL⁻¹. Furthermore, sulfatides (125 µg mL⁻¹) prevented the adhesion of platelets or glycocalicin-coupled polystyrene beads to a rVWF-A1-coated surface under high shear stress. In addition, plasma VWF prebound to a sulfatide-coated surface failed to support subsequent platelet adhesion. These results provide firm evidence that sulfatides bind the VWF A1 domain at a site overlapping the GP Ib-binding site.     

Cleavage of ultra-large von Willebrand factor by ADAMTS-13 under flow conditions

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical ligand for platelet adhesion and aggregation. It is synthesized and released as multimers composed of various numbers of monomers. When first released from the storage granules of endothelial cells, VWF multimers are rich in the ultra-large (UL) forms that spontaneously bind the GP Ib-IX complex and aggregate platelets. These prothrombotic ULVWF multimers are rapidly cleaved by the metalloprotease ADAMTS-13 (A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease with ThromboSpondin motif) to smaller and much less active forms. Recently, several methods have been developed to measure ADAMTS-13 activity in vitro and to link its deficiency to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Correlations between the structure and functions of the metalloprotease have also been extensively studied using recombinant technologies. However, questions remain regarding the proper substrate for the metalloprotease, the time and location of ULVWF proteolysis, and the role of fluid shear stress. In this brief review, we have discussed a potential model for ULVWF proteolysis by ADAMTS-13 in vivo. In this model, ULVWF is anchored to the surface of endothelial cells to form string-like structures under fluid shear stress. Such an elongated conformation facilitates ULVWF cleavage by exposing either the cleavage or binding sites for the metalloprotease. When ADAMTS-13 is deficient, the uncleaved ULVWF accumulates in plasma and on endothelial cells to capture platelets. This leads to platelet aggregation and thromboembolism. Dissecting the process of ULVWF proteolysis is important for not only understanding the pathophysiology of thrombotic microangiopathies, but also developing more effective means to treat these deadly diseases.     

Multi‐step binding of ADAMTS‐13 to von Willebrand factor

Summary. Background: ADAMTS‐13 proteolytic activity is controlled by the conformation of its substrate, von Willebrand factor (VWF), and changes in the secondary structure of VWF are essential for efficient cleavage. Substrate recognition is mediated through several non‐catalytic domains in ADAMTS‐13 distant from the active site. Objectives: We hypothesized that not all binding sites for ADAMTS‐13 in VWF are cryptic and analyzed binding of native VWF to ADAMTS‐13. Methods: Immunoprecipiation of VWF–ADAMTS‐13 complexes using anti‐VWF antibodies and magnetic beads was used. Binding was assessed by Western blotting and immunosorbent assays. Results: Co‐immunoprecipitation demonstrated that ADAMTS‐13 binds to native multimeric VWF (K_d of 79 ± 11 nmol L^?1) with no measurable proteolysis. Upon shear‐induced unfolding of VWF, binding increased 3‐fold and VWF was cleaved. Binding to native VWF was saturable, time dependent, reversible and did not vary with ionic strength (I of 50–200). Moreover, results with ADAMTS‐13 deletion mutants indicated that binding to native VWF is mediated through domains distal to the ADAMTS‐13 spacer, probably thrombospondin‐1 repeats. Interestingly, this interaction occurs in normal human plasma with an ADAMTS‐13 to VWF stoichiometry of 0.0040 ± 0.0004 (mean ± SEM, n = 10). Conclusions: ADAMTS‐13 binds to circulating VWF and may therefore be incorporated into a platelet‐rich thrombus, where it can immediately cleave VWF that is unfolded by fluid shear stress.     

Treatment of severe von Willebrand disease with a high-purity von Willebrand factor concentrate (Wilfactin®): a prospective study of 50 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate with low factor VIII (FVIII) content was specifically developed to treat von Willebrand disease (VWD). Efficacy and safety were investigated by merging the results of two comparable protocols conducted prospectively in 5 European and 12 French centers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients with clinically severe VWD (72% had VWF ristocetin cofactor activity less than 10 IU dL(-1) and 46% had FVIII < 20 IU dL(-1)) were treated with the concentrate as the only therapy, except for clinical situations requiring a priming dose of FVIII to rapidly correct an intrinsic coagulation defect. A total of 139 spontaneous bleeding episodes were treated; only 53 (38%) needed a concomitant FVIII dose. Outcome was excellent or good in 89% of the episodes. Forty-four patients underwent 108 surgical or invasive procedures. Outcome was excellent or good in 95 scheduled procedures (only VWF was infused) and 13 emergency procedures (a priming FVIII dose was co-administered with the first VWF infusion). There were no thrombotic complications and none of the 18 patients with type 3 VWD developed anti-VWF or anti-FVIII antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: This concentrate safely and effectively provides hemostasis in patients with clinically severe VWD.     

Evaluation of a microfluidic flow assay to screen for von Willebrand disease and low von Willebrand factor levels

Essentials

• von Willebrand factor (VWF) function is shear stress dependent.
• Platelet accumulation in a microfluidic assay correlates with VWF levels.
• The microfluidic assay discriminates type 1 von Willebrand disease from healthy controls.
• The microfluidic flow assay detects responses to therapeutic intervention (DDAVP).

Summary

Background

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a mucocutaneous bleeding disorder with a reported prevalence of 1 in 10 000. von Willebrand factor (VWF) function and platelet adhesion are regulated by hemodynamic forces that are not integrated into most current clinical assays.

Objective

We evaluated whether a custom microfluidic flow assay (MFA) can screen for deficiencies in VWF in patients presenting with mucocutaneous bleeding.

Methods

Whole blood from individuals with mucocutaneous bleeding was assayed in a custom MFA.

Results

Thirty‐two patients with type 1 VWD (10/32) or reported mucocutaneous bleeding were enrolled. The platelet adhesion velocity (r = 0.5978 for 750 s^?1 and 0.6895 for 1500 s^?1) and the maximum platelet surface area coverage (r = 0.5719 for 750 s^?1 and 0.6633 for 1500 s^?1) in the MFA correlated with VWF levels. Furthermore, the platelet adhesion velocity at 750 s^?1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.0009761, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0003404–0.001612; control, mean 0.003587, 95% CI 0.002455–0.004719) and at 1500 s^?1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.0003585, 95% CI 0.00003914–0.0006778; control, mean 0.003132, 95% CI 0.001565–0.004699) differentiated type 1 VWD from controls. Maximum platelet surface area coverage at 750 s^?1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.1831, 95% CI 0.03816–0.3281; control, mean 0.6755, 95% CI 0.471–0.88) and at 1500 s^?1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.07873, 95% CI 0.01689–0.1406; control, mean 0.6432, 95% CI 0.3607–0.9257) also differentiated type 1 VWD from controls. We also observed an improvement in platelet accumulation after 1‐desamino‐8‐d ‐arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) treatment at 1500 s^?1 (pre‐DDAVP, mean 0.4784, 95% CI 0.1777–0.7791; post‐DDAVP, mean 0.8444, 95% CI 0.7162–0.9726).

Conclusions

These data suggest that this approach can be used as a screening tool for VWD.

     

von Willebrand factor mediates platelet spreading through glycoprotein Ib and αIIbβ3 in the presence of botrocetin and ristocetin, respectively

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand factor (VWF) plays a critical role in the process of hemostasis by mediating flow-dependent adhesion and spreading of platelets on exposed extracellular matrix proteins following vascular injury. To accomplish this, VWF binds to two distinct platelet receptors: glycoprotein (GP)Ib-IX-V and integrin alpha(IIb)beta3. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of GPIb and alpha(IIb)beta3 to mediate platelet adhesion and lamellipodia formation on immobilized VWF in the presence of the biochemical modulators, ristocetin and botrocetin. RESULTS: In the presence of botrocetin and inhibitors of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thromboxane A2 (TxA2), VWF is able to support formation of lamellipodia through a GPIb-dependent mechanism that is independent of alpha(IIb)beta3 and PI3-kinase. Lamellipodia formation under these conditions is incomplete. In marked contrast, in the presence of ristocetin, VWF stimulates formation of fully spread lamellipodia through a pathway that is dependent upon alpha(IIb)beta3 and PI3-kinase. Furthermore, alpha(IIb)beta3 also supports platelet spreading on VWF alone, but only in the absence of inhibitors of ADP and TxA2. The localization of filamentous actin and the Arp2/3 complex in platelets on VWF in the presence of botrocetin and ristocetin are distinct, yielding disparate lamellipodium kinetic signatures. Interestingly, botrocetin significantly enhances platelet adhesion to VWF under flow in whole blood in an alpha(IIb)beta3-independent manner, while ristocetin augments washed platelet adhesion and spreading to VWF under flow in an alpha(IIb)beta3-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: These observations demonstrate that VWF is able to induce lamellipodia formation through distinct receptors, and has important consequences for investigation of the role of VWF-GPIb interactions in the context of platelet regulation.     

Critical von Willebrand factor A1 domain residues influence type VI collagen binding

Summary. Background: von Willebrand factor (VWF) binds to subendothelial collagen at sites of vascular injury. Laboratory testing for von Willebrand disease (VWD), however, does not always include collagen binding assays (VWF:CB) and standard VWF:CB assays use type I and/or type III collagen rather than type VI collagen. Objectives: We report here on several mutations that exclusively alter binding to type VI collagen. Patients/methods: Healthy controls and index cases from the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD were analyzed for VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity and VWF:CB with types I, III and VI collagen. VWF gene sequencing was performed for all subjects. Results: Two healthy controls and one type 1 VWD subject were heterozygous for an A1 domain sequence variation, R1399H, and displayed a selective decreased binding to type VI collagen but not types I and III. Expression of recombinant 1399H VWF resulted in absent binding to type VI collagen. Two other VWF A1 domain mutations, S1387I and Q1402P, displayed diminished binding to type VI collagen. An 11 amino acid deletion in the A1 domain also abrogated binding to type VI collagen. Conclusions: VWF:CB may be useful in diagnosis of VWD, as a decreased VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratio may reflect specific loss of collagen binding ability. Mutations that exclusively affect type VI collagen binding may be associated with bleeding, yet missed by current VWF testing.     

Formation of platelet‐binding von Willebrand factor strings on non‐endothelial cells

Summary. Background and Objective: Von Willebrand factor (VWF) forms strings on activated vascular endothelial cells that recruit platelets and initiate clot formation. Alterations in VWF strings may disturb hemostasis. This study was aimed at developing a flexible model system for structure–function studies of VWF strings. Methods: VWF strings were generated by inducing exocytosis of pseudo‐Weibel–Palade bodies from VWF‐transfected HEK293 cells, and the properties of these strings under static conditions and under flow were characterized. Results: Upon exocytosis, VWF unfurled into strings several hundred micrometers in length. These strings could form bundles and networks, and bound platelets under flow, resembling authentic endothelial VWF strings. Anchorage of the platelet‐decorated VWF strings was independent of P‐selectin and integrin α_Vβ₃. Translocation of platelets along the strings, elongation and fragmentation of the strings frequently occurred under flow. Furthermore, VWF variants with the p.Tyr87Ser and p.Cys2773Ser mutations, which are defective in multimer assembly, did not give rise to VWF strings. Also, insertion of the green fluorescent protein into VWF inhibited string formation. Conclusions: HEK293 cells provide a flexible and useful model system for the study of VWF string formation. Our results suggest that structural changes in VWF may modulate string formation and function, and contribute to hemostatic disorders.     

Validation of an automated latex particle–enhanced immunoturbidimetric von Willebrand factor activity assay

Summary. Background: Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) requires accurate measurement of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. Objectives: To evaluate laboratory characteristics, diagnostic accuracy and testing utilities of an automated latex particle–enhanced immunoturbidimetric VWF assay (VWF:Lx) based on a monoclonal antibody recognizing the VWF‐platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib binding domain. Methods: Laboratory characteristics including lower detection limit, linearity, precision, sample stability, and method comparison between VWF:Lx and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity by platelet aggregometry (VWF:RCo) were examined. To assess VWF:Lx diagnostic accuracy, 492 patient plasma samples, including 40 previously characterized VWD patient samples, were tested for VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo by either aggregometry or flow cytometry, and VWF:Lx with supplemental VWF multimer analysis when indicated. Based on results of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and VWF multimer analysis, and available clinical information, samples were categorized as: normal; VWD types 1, 2A/B, 2M, or severe 1 vs. 2M; or acquired VWF abnormalities (AVWA) due to subtle loss of highest molecular weight multimers. Results: VWF:Lx had excellent laboratory characteristics and linear correlation with VWF:RCo (R² = 0.93). VWF:Lx accurately classified virtually all normal and VWD patient samples. Compared with VWF:RCo, VWF:Lx had superior sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing severe type 1 vs. 2M VWD and identifying AVWA. A proposed screening panel comprising VWF:Ag and VWF:Lx had 100% and 83% sensitivity for detecting VWD and AVWA, respectively. Conclusions: VWF:Lx has excellent laboratory characteristics and diagnostic accuracy compared with VWF:RCo, and can be used as part of an initial VWD screening panel and as a supplementary test.