Follow-up experience using histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

In May 2003, at Indiana University, the standard cold preservation solution University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced by histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution. Earlier, we presented our initial experience with HTK in pancreas preservation with an analysis of the first 10 pancreas transplants. Here we report updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation over the past 18 months. Between May 2003 and March 2005, a total of 87 pancreas transplants were performed with 78 of these organs utilizing HTK. Seventy five patients received 78 organ transplants. Surgical procedures performed were: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 50, 64%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 19, 24%), solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 9, 12%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction and 30-day graft and patient survivals, and compared to the UW cohort from our original report. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Mean follow-up time is 12 +/- 6 months. The mean cold ischemia time was 9 +/- 3 hours. There were no cases of primary graft nonfunction. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survivals were 99% and 93%. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals were 96% and 93%. There were five grafts lost, including three within the first month (two venous and one arterial thrombosis). There was one case of chronic rejection and one noncompliance. All other patients were insulin-independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. Within this range of cold ischemia time, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin solutions as primary preservation in renal allografts undergoing pulsatile perfusion

INTRODUCTION: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is the standard preservation solution for organ transplantation. Histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution has been used increasingly for kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation. This study compared HTK and UW used during kidney procurement with subsequent pulsatile perfusion. METHODS: Between January and October 2003, 91 deceased renal and simultaneous kidney pancreas transplants were performed (UW, n = 41, and HTK, n = 50). There were no differences with regard to donor and recipient demographics or cold ischemia. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 3 (7%) of UW and 4 (8%) of HTK-preserved kidneys (P = NS). There were no significant differences between patient or graft survival. There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.1 +/- 1.0 vs UW: 3.0 +/- 0.5; P < .005). CONCLUSION: UW and HTK appear to have similar efficacy in kidney preservation with pulsatile perfusion. HTK preservation solution can be used safely in conjunction with pulsatile preservation for cold storage of renal allografts.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution for organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is currently the standard preservation solution used for abdominal organ transplantation. This study assesses the efficacy of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) compared with UW in pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Between October 2002 and August 2003, 20 pancreas transplants were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: UW (n=10) and HTK (n=10). Donor and recipient demographics were similar in both groups. The mean cold ischemia time for both groups was 11 +/-3 hr. RESULTS: There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.5 +/- 1.2 L vs. UW: 3.4 +/-0.8 L; P =0.03). Patient and graft survivals to date were 100% in both groups. Serum fasting blood glucose, peak amylase, and serial amylase levels remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Within this range of cold ischemia time, UW and HTK demonstrate similar efficacy in pancreas preservation.     

Initial experience using histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: The colloid-based University of Wisconsin (UW) preservation solution has been used extensively in clinical pancreas transplantation. Experimental studies support the use of the crystalloid-based histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solution for this purpose. AIM: We report our initial experience with HTK for pancreas allograft preservation and compare this to a contemporary experience with UW solution in conventional multiorgan deceased donors (<50 yr). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively collected information on 33 pancreas transplants between September 2001 and October 2002 were analyzed for early graft function and complications up to 30 d after procurement and storage in either HTK or UW solutions. During multi-organ recovery, either UW solution (4-5 L) or HTK solution (8-10 L) was used for aortic perfusion and subsequent back-table flush and storage. Exocrine drainage of 31 pancreas allografts was enteric, while the bladder was used for drainage in two cases. Patient outcomes were analyzed according to the preservation solution used. Sixteen pancreata were used in combination with a kidney allograft (SPK), seven were used in patients after prior kidney transplantation (PAK), while 10 were used in patients who were not in renal failure (PTA). RESULTS: The UW group consisted of 17 patients (10 SPK, three PAK, four PTA) with a mean donor age of 29.5 +/- 10.7, and a mean cold ischemia time of 15.1 +/- 2.1 h. The mean post-transplant pancreas and kidney function on days 1 and 10 were amylase (315 and 99 IU/L), lipase (1727 and 346 IU/L), glucose (121 and 100 mg/dL) and creatinine (5.01 and 1.77 mg/dL). Patient and graft survival was 100% at 1-month post transplant. In the HTK group there were 16 patients (six SPK, four PAK, six PTA) with a mean donor age 21.9 +/- 5.7 and a mean cold ischemia time 14.0 +/- 1.3 h. The mean post-transplant pancreas and kidney function on days 1 and 10 were amylase (588 and 126 IU/L), lipase (4711 and 441 IU/L), glucose (97 and 109 mg/dL) and creatinine (5.28 and 2.42 mg/dL). Patient survival was 100% while graft survival was 94% at 1-month post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Early graft function and complications are comparable with HTK and UW solutions for pancreas allograft preservation.     

A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing histidine–tryptophane–ketoglutarate versus University of Wisconsin perfusion solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

We aimed to evaluate early pancreas transplant graft function after histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) perfusion. Prospective randomized multicenter study including 68 pancreas transplantations stratified according to preservation fluid used (27 HTK vs. 41 UW). Primary endpoint was pancreas graft survival at 6 months. Serum α-amylase, lipase, C-peptide, HbA1C and exogenous insulin requirement were compared at several time points. Mean pancreas cold ischemia time was 10.8 ± 3.7 (HTK) vs. 11.8 ± 3.4 h (UW) ( P  = 0.247). Simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation was performed in 95.6% of the patients, pancreas transplantation alone in 2.9%, and pancreas after kidney transplantation in 1.5%. Six months graft survival was 85.2% (HTK) vs. 90.2% (UW) ( P  = 0.703). Serum amylase and lipase values did not differ between both the groups during the observation period. C-peptide levels were elevated in both the groups without significant differences at each time point. Higher exogenous insulin requirement early after transplantation in the UW group had resolved at 3 months. Six month patient survival was 96.3% (HTK) vs. 100% (UW) ( P  = 0.397). With a mean cold ischemia time of 10 h in this study, HTK and UW solutions appear to be equally suitable for perfusion and organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation.     

Histidine‐Tryptophan‐Ketoglutarate for Pancreas Allograft Preservation: The Indiana University Experience

Histidine‐tryptophan‐ketoglutarate solution (HTK) has been scrutinized for use in pancreas transplantation. A recent case series and a United Network for Organ Sharing data base review have suggested an increased incidence of allograft pancreatitis and graft loss with HTK compared to the University of Wisconsin solution (UW). Conversely, a recent randomized, controlled study failed to show any significant difference between HTK and UW for pancreas allograft preservation. This study was a retrospective review of all pancreas transplants performed at Indiana University between 2003 and 2009 comparing preservation with HTK or UW. Data included recipient and donor demographics, 7‐day, 90‐day and 1‐year graft survival, peak 30‐day serum amylase and lipase, HbA1c and C‐peptide levels. Of the 308 pancreas transplants, 84% used HTK and 16% UW. There were more SPK compared to pancreas after kidney and pancreas transplant alone in the HTK group. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. There was no significant difference in 7‐day, 90‐day or 1‐year graft survival, 30‐day peak serum amylase and lipase, HbA1c or C‐peptide. No clinically significant difference between HTK and UW for pancreas allograft preservation was identified. Specifically, in the context of low‐to‐moderate flush volume and short cold ischemia time (≤10 h), no increased incidence of allograft pancreatitis or graft loss was observed.     

Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions: a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND: Celsior is an extracellular-type, low-viscosity, preservation solution already used for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. We report the results of a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study specifically designed to compare the safety profile of Celsior solution with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in clinical pancreas transplantation. METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive procurements were randomized to graft preservation with UW (n=53) solution or Celsior (n=52) solution. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Five grafts were discarded and 100 grafts (50 UW vs. 50 Celsior) were transplanted. Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 11.0 +/- 2.1 hr and 37.2 +/- 6.0 min for UW compared with 10.8 +/- 1.8 hr and 38.1 +/- 5.9 min for Celsior (P =not significant). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in one graft preserved with UW solution. Eleven recipients (UW 12% vs. Celsior 10%, P =not significant) required a relaparotomy. The mean serum levels of glucose, amylase, and lipase remained comparable between the study arms at equivalent intervals after transplantation. One recipient died with functioning grafts in each study arm; two further grafts were lost to arterial thrombosis (Celsior) and chronic rejection (UW), respectively. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates overlapped in the two study arms (98% and 96%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia time reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas preservation.     

Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions

BACKGROUND: Although the use of Celsior has been recently described for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation, no data are available on its use for clinical pancreas preservation. METHODS: We herein describe the results of 112 pancreas transplants preserved with either University of Wisconsin (UW; (n = 56) or Celsior (n = 56) solution at two Italian transplant centers. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 10.1 +/- 2.2 hours and 37.2 +/- 8.2 minutes for UW compared to 10.8 +/- 2.4 hours and 38.3 +/- 6.7 minutes for Celsior (P = NS). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in two UW-preserved grafts (3.6%). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 94.6% for UW as compared with 100% for Celsior (P = NS). Equivalent graft survival figures were 91.0% for UW as compared with 96.4% for Celsior (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas transplantation.     

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival in Pancreas Transplantation

Prior single-center studies have reported that pancreas allograft survival is not affected by preservation in histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. To expand on these studies, we analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database of pancreas transplants from July 2004, through February 2008, to determine if preservation with HTK (N = 1081) versus UW (N = 3311) impacted graft survival. HTK preservation of pancreas allografts increased significantly in this time frame, from 15.4% in 2004 to 25.4% in 2008. After adjusting for other recipient, donor, graft and transplant center factors that impact graft survival, HTK preservation was independently associated with an increased risk of pancreas graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, p = 0.014), especially in pancreas allografts with cold ischemia time (CIT) ≥12 h (HR 1.42, p = 0.017). This reduced survival with HTK preservation as compared to UW preservation was seen in both simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants and pancreas alone (PA) transplants. Furthermore, HTK preservation was also associated with a 1.54-fold higher odds of early (<30 days) pancreas graft loss as compared to UW (OR 1.54, p = 0.008). These results suggest that the increasing use of HTK for abdominal organ preservation should be re-examined.     

Early pancreas transplant outcomes with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate preservation: a multicenter study

Little is known about the use of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solution for pancreas preservation. We compared early pancreas graft outcomes at four pancreas transplant programs within the state of Michigan in 2002 and 2003 (University of Wisconsin [UW] era) with those in 2004 (HTK era). The primary endpoint was early graft loss. The UW group (n=41) and the HTK group (n=36) had similar outcomes with respect to: technical graft loss (9.8% vs. 8.3%, P=NS), 90-day graft function (90.2% vs. 86.1%, P=NS), and rate of pancreatic leak/abscess (12.2% vs. 11.1%, P=NS). There were also no significant differences in postoperative amylase and lipase levels between the two groups. The HTK group did have significantly more acute rejection within the first 180 days (25.0% vs. 9.8%, P<0.05). HTK is a suitable substitute for UW in the preservation of pancreas allografts.     

Impact of organ preservation using HTK for graft flush and subsequent storage in UW in rat kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, preservation has a significant influence on organ function. Since previous reports have indicated a benefit of combining histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, we evaluated the effects of initial flush with low viscosity HTK, followed by storage in UW. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Kidneys from inbred Lewis rats were procured using HTK or UW for initially perfusion and re-flushed after 30 min with either solution. In a third group, after perfusion with HTK, organs were re-flushed with UW. Organs were stored for 16-24 h (4 degrees C). Study parameters were high-energy phosphates, histology, apoptosis, recipient survival and urine excretion of 15-F2t -isoprostanes (oxidative stress marker). RESULTS: Prior to transplantation, tissue ATP/ADP concentrations were: HTK/UW > UW-only > HTK-only. In transplanted kidneys, histological damage was highest after preservation in HTK-only. Twenty-four hours after transplantation (24 h cold ischemia time - CIT), cleaved-PARP was most abundant using UW-only. 16 h of CIT resulted in higher urine concentrations of isoprostanes in the order HTK-only (368 +/- 308) > UW-only (157 +/- 105) > HTK/UW (67 +/- 26), and was lower in HTK/UW after 24 h of CIT (146 +/- 38) vs. UW-only (507 +/- 33 pg/mg creatinine). Survival (24 h CIT) was significantly reduced, and percentage of initial non-functioning (INF) kidneys highest in HTK-only (2.6 +/- 0.3 days, 100%), compared to UW-only (13 +/- 4.4 days, 75%) and HTK/UW (18.5 +/- 4.6 days, 33%). CONCLUSIONS: In long-term preservation, UW is superior over HTK. However, our results indicate that perfusion with HTK prior to storage in UW may improve the results of UW alone which is reflected by better survival, lower rate of INF, higher cellular energy conservation and a decrease of free radicals.     

Histidine–Tryptophan–Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Livers, Especially Those Donated After Cardiac Death

Single-center studies have reported that liver allograft survival is not affected by preservation in histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. We analyzed the UNOS database of liver transplants performed from July, 2004, through February, 2008, to determine if preservation with HTK (n = 4755) versus UW (n = 12 673) impacted graft survival. HTK preservation of allografts increased from 16.8% in 2004 to 26.9% in 2008; this was particularly striking among donor after cardiac death (DCD) allografts, rising from 20.7% in 2004 to 40.9% in 2008. After adjusting for donor, recipient and graft factors that affect graft survival, HTK preservation was associated with an increased risk of graft loss (HR 1.14, p = 0.002), especially with DCD allografts (HR 1.44, P = 0.025) and those with cold ischemia time over 8 h (HR 1.16, P = 0.009). Furthermore, HTK preservation was associated with a 1.2-fold higher odds of early (< 30 days) graft loss as compared to UW preservation (OR 1.20, p = 0.012), with a more pronounced effect on allografts with cold ischemia time over 8 h (OR 1.31, p = 0.007), DCD allografts (OR 1.63, p = 0.09) and donors over 70 years (OR 1.67, p = 0.081). These results suggest that the increasing use of HTK for abdominal organ preservation should be reexamined.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: A safe and effective preservation solution is a precondition for successful orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study compared University of Wisconsin (UW) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solutions in OLT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 137 primary cadaveric. OLT performed between January 2003 and December 2006 at our institution. Sixty-eight grafts were harvested using UW and 69 using HTK. Recipients were managed similarly in regard to operative techniques and immunosuppression. We collected donor data including serum transaminases, serum sodium, ICU stay and assessed macroscopic liver quality. Recipient serum transaminases were collected on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, and 30. We compared biliary and vascular complications, as well as patient and graft survivals. RESULTS: Mean serum bilirubin levels were slightly higher in the HTK group at 1,7,14, and 30 days after transplantation, whereas transaminases were higher in the UW group. Primary nonfunction occurred in 1 patient in each group. Retransplantation was performed in 5 patients in the UW and in 9 patients in the HTK group. Biliary complication rates were similar in the UW and HTK groups (22% and 17%, respectively). Six arterial complications occurred in the HTK (8.7%) and 2 in the UW group (2.9%; P < .05). Mean follow-up was 25 months. Graft survival at 1, 12, and 36 months was 90%, 78%, and 75% versus 90%, 71%, and 71% in the UW versus HTK groups, respectively. One-, 12-, and 36-month patient survival rates were 93%, 78%, and 75% versus 93%, 78%, and 78% in the UW versus HTK groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in graft and patient survivals between the 2 groups. Whereas the biliary complication rates were comparable in both groups, the arterial complications were clearly higher in the UW group (8.7% vs 2.9%; P < .05%). UW and HTK solutions seemed to be equally safe and effective in the preservation of liver grafts. The high incidence of arterial complications in the UW group requires further prospective studies.     

Evaluation of a novel cold storage solution (HBs) in a rat kidney transplant model.

We developed an improved solution for hypothermic storage (0-4 degrees C) of kidneys. The cold storage solution (HBS) was composed of macromolecules, high-energy cellular substrates, and a mixture of antiproteolytic amino acids, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory compounds. The objectives in developing this solution were to achieve superior metabolic support of the kidney during cold storage and to protect against ischemic injury. Inbred Brown Norway rats, weighing 225-250 g, were subjected to orthotopic ultrarapid technique for kidney isotransplantation to minimize warm ischemia and to test the preservation process. The kidney was transplanted after 12 h of preservation. The animals were divided into three groups based upon the preservation solution utilized: HBS solution, HTK solution (Custodiol), and UW solution (UWS)(ViaSpan). Among the recipients, each group had two subsets. The first subset of animals was used to assess survival at 7 days as well as the reperfusion damage index (RDI) based on the macroscopic physical characteristics of the kidney at the time of transplantation. The second subset in each group was utilized to measure serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen at 4 and 7 days, and histology at death or sacrifice. Mean +/- standard deviation (M +/- SD) was used for all parameters studied. The HBS solution showed significantly better protection at 12 h when compared to HTK and UW solutions. The reperfusion damage index (RDI) showed excellent preservation in the HBS (14 +/- 1), good preservation in UWS (13 +/- 1.5), and moderate preservation in the HTK (11 +/- 2) group. Histology was in concordance with the RDI, showing better histological findings with HBS and UW solutions than with the HTK group. Serum creatinine was significantly better in the HBS group when compared to HTK and UWS. Survival was statistically different, with 80% survival at 7 days in the HBS group, 20% survival in the HTK group, and 50% survival in the UWS group (p < .05). The HBS solution offered a new alternative for kidney cold storage with significantly better results when compared to the current gold standards of HTK and UW solutions in Brown Norway rats. This solution warrants further testing in other mammals.     

Experience with hystidine tryptophan ketoglutarate versus University Wisconsin preservation solutions in transplantation

We present our experience with histidine tryptophan ketoglutarate (HTK) and University Wisconsin (UW) preservation solutions in liver transplantation and a review of the literature in pancreas and kidney transplantation comparing these solutions. A group of 134 liver transplantations in 123 recipients was analyzed retrospectively. Grafts procured in adults were perfused with HTK in 63 cases and with UW in 71 cases. We compared results according to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters, as well as complications and survival. No differences regarding donor and recipient data, intraoperative fresh frozen plasma (FFP) substitution, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and ischemic damage of the graft were found. The rate of complications was comparable in both groups. However, the bilirubin was higher in the UW group. The rate of biliary complications was higher in the UW group (n = 8) versus the HTK group (n = 5). HTK ischemic type biliary lesions (ITBL) were only present in the UW group. Patient and graft survival were statistically nonsignificant. The data confirm that HTK and UW, with exception of biliary complications, are considered comparable in clinical liver transplantation. The same conclusion can be taken from the literature analyzed concerning renal transplantation, and in smaller groups of pancreas transplants, similar results were published.     

Use of IGL–1 Preservation Solution in Liver Transplantation

University of Wisconsin (UW) solution has been known as the standard solution for liver graft preservation. Alternative preservation solutions have been used in liver transplantation, such as histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and Celsior solution. Institut Georges Lopez-1 (IGL--1) is a new preservation solution with lower potassium and lower viscosity than UW solution that has recently been used in liver transplant. Data from 178 patients who received transplants from August 2008 to June 2013 at Hospital Santa Isabel, Blumenau, Brazil, were analyzed. All patients received grafts from brain death donors. In November 2011 we started to use IGL--1 as an alternate preservation solution. Therefore, 53 patients using IGL--1 preserved grafts were compared to 125 using HTK solution. The donor age in the HTK group ranged from 11–77 years, with a mean of 43.4 ± 4.8. In the IGL--1 group donor age ranged from 9–62 years, with a mean of 35.8 ± 4.5. Cold ischemia time in the HTK group ranged from 85–1145 minutes, mean 443.5 ± 183.5 minutes. In the IGL--1 group, cold ischemia time ranged from 85–670 minutes, mean 329.3 ± 134.8 minutes. The overall operative mortality rate was 14% (25 patients); in the HTK group, 14.4% (18 patients); and in the IGL--1 group, 13.4% (7 patients). One graft in the HTK group presented with primary non-function (PNF), 0.7%; there were none in the IGL--1 group. In our study, IGL--1 has been shown to be safe to use as a preservation solution for liver transplantation. Early post-transplant graft function was comparable to that observed with HTK solution, although a tendency for lower alanine aminotransferase levels was noticed. IGL--1 has been shown to be safe, cost efficient, and an effective preservation solution.     

Amylase levels in preservation solutions as a marker of exocrine tissue injury and as a prognostic factor for pancreatic islet isolation

Occurrence of primary graft nonfunction of pancreatic islets demands research for new methods of organ preservation during cold ischemia conditions. Digestive enzymes released during preservation injure the islets for subsequent rewarming and islet isolation processes. The aim of our study was to assess the amylase level in preservation solution as a marker of exocrine tissue injury, allowing the prognosis of islet yield and viability. The experiments undertaken on rats used three commercially available preservation solutions: ViaSpan (UW); Custodiol (HTK); and Euro-Collins (EC). After 180 minutes of cold ischemia, the highest islet recovery was observed among pancreata stored in UW solution (508 +/- 139 vs HTK 344 +/- 103; P <.05 vs EC 322 +/- 113; P <.05). These islets also revealed the highest insulin stimulation index in glucose static tests (1.19 +/- 0.30 vs HTK, 0.87 +/- 0.43; P <.01, vs EC.25 +/-.06; P <.001). The highest amylase level in the preservation solution was associated with a decreased yield of islets during the isolation process and lowest insulin stimulation index (increasing 139 +/- 18% for EC, 108 +/- 12% for HTK; P <.05 vs 87 +/- 10% for UW; P <.05). Our data strongly suggest, that the dynamic of amylase release during pancreas preservation at 4 degrees C correlates with a reduced number and viability of isolated islets. These results suggest that measurement of amylase levels after pancreas preservation may have potential clinical application as a marker to evaluate pancreatic tissue injury.     

Histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate solution for organ preservation in human liver transplantation—a prospective multi-centre observation study

Based on experimental work and clinical small studies, histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) solution was found to be suitable not only for heart and kidney preservation but also for liver preservation. We decided, therefore, to use this preservation solution for clinical liver preservation in a prospective multi-centre trial. Enrolment to the study was from 1996 to 1999 in four European centres, and the results of 214 patients with HTK-preserved organs were analysed. Analysis showed a primary dysfunction (PDF) rate of 8.8%, with a primary non-function (PNF) rate of 2.3% and initial poor function (IPF) in 6.5%. Patient survival rate at 1 year was 83% and 1-year graft survival rate was 80%. In a univariate and a multivariate analysis PDF, early surgical complications and tendentiously severe infections (septicaemia, pneumonia, cholangitis) were identified as independent risk factors for graft and patient survival. Preservation with HTK can be regarded as an established alternative to preservation with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution when preservation times are short. Definitive assessment of the efficacy of preservation solutions requires further prospective randomised clinical trials that compare HTK and UW.     

Comparison of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin Preservation in Renal Transplantation

Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) is replacing University of Wisconsin (UW) solution as the preservation fluid for renal allografts in many centers, but recent large-scale data to support this transition are lacking. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient and graft outcomes after renal transplantation at our center, comparing 475 consecutive living donor and 317 deceased donor transplants since the adoption of HTK with equal numbers of grafts preserved using UW solution. Data collected included donor and recipient age, race, sex, comorbidities and graft ischemia time. Graft and patient survival, as well as the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), were studied by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis. No significant difference was seen in either patient or graft survival. Deceased donor kidneys in the HTK group had a higher incidence of DGF than the UW cohort, whereas this trend was reversed in the case of living donor organs. In multivariate analysis, HTK was associated with a significant risk reduction on the incidence of DGF. Prolonged preservation with HTK compared to UW was not associated with excess risk to the graft or patient. In summary, HTK demonstrated efficacy similar to UW in terms of patient and graft survival.     

Low viscosity histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate graft flush improves subsequent extended cold storage in University of Wisconsin solution in an extracorporeal rat liver perfusion and rat liver transplantation model.

Adequate flushing for liver donation requires large fluid volumes delivered at a high flow. This can be achieved more effectively with crystalloid solutions than with colloid-based solutions. This study examined the combination of initial histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK) graft flush and subsequent storage in University of Wisconsin solution (UW) to that of the single use of each solution. Livers from inbred Wistar rats were procured using aortic perfusion with UW or HTK for initial perfusion and reflushed after 30 minutes using either solution. In a third group, after perfusion with HTK, organs were reflushed with UW. A 60-minute in-vitro recirculating perfusion was performed after 24 hours of cold storage in the subsequent solution, as well as allotransplantation after 18 and 24 hours of cold storage. In extracorporeal perfusion, the HTK flush followed by UW storage was superior compared to the single use of either UW or HTK solution, as measured by portal venous pressure, bile flow, liver enzymes released into the effluent perfusate, glycerol leakage, and histological examinations. These data were consistent with the transplantation study. Histological damage and enzyme release after 5-day survival were lowest in the HTK flush and subsequent UW storage groups following 18 hours of cold storage; likewise, the 5-day survival was superior following 24 hours of cold storage. In conclusion, the combined use of HTK solution for initial graft rinse and subsequent storage in UW solution resulted in a cumulative protection. Choosing low-viscosity HTK solution for the initial organ flush may represent a feasible improvement in liver preservation, which also further reduces the required amount of UW solution.