Epidemiology, pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment of systolic and diastolic heart failure

Underlying causes, risk factors, and precipitating causes of heart failure (HF) should be treated. Drugs known to precipitate or aggravate HF such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs should be stopped. Patients with HF and a low left ventricular ejection fraction (systolic heart failure) or normal ejection fraction (diastolic HF) should be treated with diuretics if fluid retention is present, with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker if the patient cannot tolerate an ACE inhibitor because of cough, angioneurotic edema, rash, or altered taste sensation, and with a beta blocker unless contraindicated. If severe systolic HF persists, an aldosterone antagonist should be added. If HF persists, isosorbide dinitrate plus hydralazine should be added. Calcium channel blockers should be avoided if systolic HF is present. Digoxin should be avoided in men and women with diastolic HF if sinus rhythm is present and in women with systolic HF. Digoxin should be given to men with systolic HF if symptoms persist, but the serum digoxin level should be maintained between 0.5 and 0.8 ng/mL.     

Epidemiology,pathophysiology, prognosis,and treatment of systolic and diastolic heart failure in elderly patients

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I recommendations for treating patients with heart failure (HF) and abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction are diuretics in patients with fluid retention, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor unless contraindicated, a beta-blocker unless contraindicated, digoxin for the treatment of symptoms of HF, and withdrawal of drugs known to precipitate or aggravate HF such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, calcium channel blockers, and most antiarrhythmic drugs. Class II(a) recommendations for treating HF with abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction are spironolactone in patients with class IV symptoms, preserved renal function, and normal serum potassium; exercise training as an adjunctive approach to improve clinical status in ambulatory patients; an angiotensin receptor blocker in patients who cannot be given an ACE inhibitor because of cough, rash, altered taste sensation, or angioedema; and hydralazine plus nitrates in patients being treated with diuretics, a beta-blocker, and digoxin who cannot be given an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker because of hypotension or renal insufficiency. Patients with diastolic HF should be treated with cautious use of diuretics and with a beta-blocker. An ACE inhibitor should be added if HF persists or an angiotensin receptor blocker if the patient cannot tolerate an ACE inhibitor because of cough, angioedema, rash, or altered taste sensation. Isosorbide dinitrate plus hydralazine should be added if HF persists. A calcium channel blocker should be added if HF persists. Digoxin should be avoided in diastolic HF if sinus rhythm is present.     

Clinical issues related to discontinuing digoxin therapy in elderly nursing home patients

Digoxin is commonly used to treat congestive heart failure. Digoxin augments ventricular systolic performance, but does not benefit patients whose congestive heart failure is caused by poor diastolic function. We studied 47 elderly nursing home patients who were receiving long-term digoxin therapy. The left ventricular ejection fractions were measured using both a standard and a highly portable echocardiography machine. Thirty-five of 47 patients had normal ejection fractions (50% or greater). In this subgroup, 23 patients were in normal sinus rhythm. Digoxin was discontinued in 14 patients with good systolic function and normal sinus rhythm, but in nine cases physicians refused to stop the digoxin. Follow-up evaluations showed no deterioration off digoxin. Excellent correlations existed between estimated left ventricular ejection fractions from the two echocardiography machines. Many nursing home patients taking digoxin do not need it. Physician reluctance to discontinue digoxin may change with the availability of highly portable echocardiography.     

The place of cardiac glycosides in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Part III. The DIG trial

In a series of papers the authors analyze literature data on the use of cardiac glycosides for long term treatment of chronic heart failure. Data obtained in prospective placebo controlled trial DIG show that digoxin significantly increases mortality of all patients with sinus rhythm and intact left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction > 45%) and of women with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 45%). Men with left ventricular systolic dysfunction represent the only category of patients with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm in whom long term administration of digoxin is justified. Digoxin does not affect mortality of these patients however it reduces requirements in hospitalizations due to worsening of heart failure.     

Contribution of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction to heart failure regardless of ejection fraction

Heart failure (HF) has been classified as systolic and diastolic based on the left ventricular ejection fraction. We hypothesized that left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is an important element of HF regardless of ejection fraction. Two hundred six patients who had clinical HF were compared with 72 age-matched controls. Diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by the mitral filling pattern and tissue Doppler imaging, was present in >90% of patients who had HF regardless of ejection fraction and was more frequent and severe than in age-matched controls (p <0.001). In patients who had HF, B-type natriuretic peptide correlated with diastolic dysfunction (r = 0.62, p <0.001) but not with ejection fraction or end-diastolic volume index (EDVI). The degree of diastolic dysfunction influenced survival rate (risk ratio 1.64, p <0.05), whereas ejection fraction and EDVI did not. Systolic function measured by systolic mitral annular velocity was decreased in patients who had HF and an ejection fraction /=0.50 (6.6 +/- 1.8 cm/s) compared with control subjects (8.0 +/- 2.1 cm/s, p <0.01). Patients who had HF and an ejection fraction >/=0.50 had an increased ratio of ventricular mass to EDVI. Patients who had HF and an ejection fraction /=0.50 is associated with mild systolic dysfunction and an increased ratio of left ventricular mass to EDVI. In HF with an ejection fraction 相似文献   

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: Untangling a Modern Gordian Knot

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) share common risk factors and frequently coexist. Both are highly prevalent in our aging population, and mortality associated with the combination is significantly higher than for each alone. An intricate link exists between AF and HF, including interrelated mechanisms and pathophysiology. Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction can exacerbate or be exacerbated by AF, resulting in HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction. A number of treatment strategies have improved symptoms, exercise tolerance, and quality of life for patients with HF, but few have resulted in alteration in prognosis. Sinus rhythm, achieved pharmacologically, has not altered important outcomes, including cardiovascular or total mortality in patients with HF. In recent studies, catheter ablation to achieve sinus rhythm seems to have a significant impact on symptoms, heart function, and possibly mortality. Until future studies can confirm or clarify the impact of catheter ablation on outcomes, the field remains cautious but optimistic that better treatment strategies for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction are within reach.     

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Heart Failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) worsens outcome in patients with systolic heart failure and the presence of heart failure (HF) predicts a 5- to 6-fold increase in risk of AF. In addition to loss of atrial systole, AF may contribute to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction due a rapid ventricular rate, irregularity of rhythm and exacerbation of mitral regurgitation due to atrial dilatation. Elimination of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation can improve ejection fraction and reduce heart failure symptoms and appears superior to AV node ablation and bi-ventricular pacing. AF ablation can restore sinus rhythm in most patients with heart failure. Additional study is warranted to identify which patients will receive maximum benefit from aggressive rhythm control and to determine efficacy in patients with diastolic heart failure.     

Effect of ivabradine on left ventricular diastolic function of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction -IVA-PEF study-

BackgroundHigh resting heart rate (HR) is a known marker of cardiovascular outcomes for heart failure (HF) patients. Ivabradine is a new class of HR lowering drug and a specific inhibitor of the I_f current in the sinoatrial node. Ivabradine substantially and significantly reduces major risks associated with HF when added to guideline-based treatment for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35% and HR ≥70 bpm in sinus rhythm. On the other hand, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently accounts for roughly half of all HF cases and usually presents as LV diastolic dysfunction. However, the association between HR reduction and LV diastolic function for HFpEF patients remains uncertain.Methods/designThis investigation into the effect of IVAbradine on left ventricular diastolic function of patients with heart failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (IVA-PEF) is a multicenter, prospective, uncontrolled, open-label, single assignment, and an interventional single-arm study to investigate the effect of ivabradine on LV diastolic function of HFpEF patients. The key inclusion criterion is HFpEF with resting HR ≥75bpm in sinus rhythm. After completed informed consent forms are obtained, patients will be given 5 mg/day of ivabradine during the study. LV diastolic function is assessed in terms of mitral inflow E and mitral e’ annular velocities (E/e’). The primary endpoint will be defined as a change in E/e′ between baseline and 3 months after the start of administration of ivabradine.ConclusionThe findings of our trial may provide a new perspective on ivabradine for the treatment of HFpEF.     

Heart failure update: treatment of heart failure with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction in the elderly

Heart failure (HF) affects approximately 5 million persons in the United States; more than 550,000 new cases of HF are reported each year. Prevalence of HF with a normal left ejection fraction increases with age and is higher in older women than older men. Both underlying and precipitating causes of HF should be treated when possible. Hypertension, especially isolated systolic hypertension, should be treated with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and beta blockers. Myocardial ischemia should be treated with nitrates and beta blockers. Anemia should be treated, as should hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and obstructive sleep apnea. Use of inappropriate drugs, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, should be avoided. Coronary revascularization should be performed in selected individuals.     

Determination of left ventricular residual function by analysis of post-extrasystolic beat in mitral stenosis.

Residual function of the left ventricle was assessed in 25 patients with mitral stenosis and a normal left ventriculogram. The post-extrasystolic beat (R2) in sinus rhythm (nine patients) and the first beat after an early beat (R2) in atrial fibrillation (16 patients) were analysed angiocardiographically. Five subjects with a normal heart (controls) were also studied. The results are expressed as percentage changes in left ventricular contractility from the beat preceding the extra beat (R1) to the beat R2. In the control group the mean changes from R1 to R2 were: end diastolic volume +68.3% (increase), end systolic volume -21.7% (decrease), ejection fraction +36.2%, mean systolic ejection rate +22.1%, and mean velocity of circumferential fibre shortening +31%. A significant increase in proportional systolic shortening of all left ventricular axes was found in R2 compared with R1. In five patients with sinus rhythm and nine with atrial fibrillation the results fell within the normal range. In the remaining patients the beat R2 indicated signs of poor left ventricular function. The mean changes from R1 to R2 in the patients with sinus rhythm and those with atrial fibrillation were respectively: end diastolic volume +47.8% and +36.6%, end systolic volume +20% and +27%, ejection fraction +12.5% and +6.2%, mean systolic ejection rate -23.3% and -30.2%, and mean velocity of circumferential fibre shortening -25.5% and -39.2%. The increase in the left ventricular axial systolic shortening was not significant. Thus analysing a post-extrasystolic beat in sinus rhythm of the beat following an early beat with a long diastole in atrial fibrillation is a valuable method of determining the residual function in patients with mitral stenosis who have a normal left ventriculogram in basic rhythm.     

Diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: rationale for RAAS antagonist/CCB combination therapy

A large number of patients who present with signs or symptoms of heart failure (HF) do not have evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. As a result, HF in the presence of normal or preserved ejection fraction, or diastolic HF, is increasingly recognized as a health care challenge. Guidelines have been issued for the classification, diagnosis, and prevention of HF from diastolic dysfunction, but treatment of this condition remains problematic. Antihypertensive agents that have been proven in clinical trials to improve outcomes in HF with systolic dysfunction, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and β-blockers, have not yet demonstrated comparable benefits in patients with diastolic dysfunction. Combination therapy using an antagonist of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and a calcium-channel blocker has potential advantages over monotherapy and is being explored in several ongoing clinical trials.     

Empfehlung zur Herzinsuffizienz

Treatment escalation of chronic systolic heart failure depends on left ventricular function and symptoms of the patients. In symptomatic patients with severely reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≤?30?%), the following therapeutic approaches are recommended: (1) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (angiotensin receptor blocker in case of ACE inhibitor intolerance); (2) β-blockers; (3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; (4) diuretics in case of signs and symptoms of congestion; (5) digitalis, in particular in patients with atrial fibrillation; (6) ivabradine in patients with sinus rhythm and a heart rate ≥?75/min; (7) an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD); (8) in case of left bundle branch block or wide QRS complex, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT; in most cases in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator); (9) intravenous administration of iron in case of iron deficiency; (10) exercise training should be strongly recommended in patients with stable heart failure.     

Impact of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: a clinical and echocardiographic study

BackgroundThe clinical significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) remains undetermined.Methods and ResultsWe compared the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics among 238 patients hospitalized for HF. Using the cutoff of left ventricular EF of 50%, there were 146 patients with HFNEF (AF = 42) and 92 with systolic HF (AF = 30). When compared among HFNEF, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (2.61 ± 0.51 versus 2.21 ± 0.46; P < .05), 6-minute walk distance (279.7 ± 66.0 versus 338.0 ± 86.1 m; P < .01), quality of life score (26.1 ± 14.3 versus 19.5 ± 10.3; P < .05), and previous HF hospitalization were significantly worse in the AF group. These variables were significantly better in HFNEF than systolic HF with sinus rhythm, but the differences were not detected among those with AF. Patients with HFNEF and AF were associated with more severe diastolic dysfunction when compared to sinus rhythm. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months, the proportion of HFNEF patients in AF with recurrent HF hospitalization or death was significantly higher than those in sinus rhythm (28.6% versus 10.6%; P < .01). Both AF and restrictive diastolic dysfunction were independent predictors of HF hospitalization or death in HFNEF.ConclusionPatients with HFNEF and AF were associated with more severe diastolic dysfunction and worse clinical outcomes than those in sinus rhythm.     

Managing the hypertensive patient with ischemic heart disease

Thiazide diuretics, b-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are all superior to placebo for the primary prevention of coronary events in patients with hypertension. Recent studies have shown that ACE inhibitors are better than other antihypertensive agents in lowering overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, especially stroke. Blood pressure should be aggressively lowered (to < 140/90 mm Hg), especially in diabetic patients (to < 130/80 mm Hg), but care should be exercised in lowering the diastolic blood pressure below 65 mm Hg in patients with significant occlusive coronary artery disease. Hypertension in patients with stable angina should be treated with a b-blocker (alternatively a calcium channel blocker) together with an ACE inhibitor. Patients with hypertension and acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or myocardial infarction) should be treated with a b-blocker, and with an ACE inhibitor if there is left ventricular dysfunction. A thiazide diuretic and/or a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker could be added for blood pressure control. Calcium channel blockers should be avoided if there is significant left ventricular dysfunction.     

Ejection Fraction and Risk of Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Systolic Dysfunction and Sinus Rhythm: Evidence for Gender Differences in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Trials

Objectives. The aims of this study were to describe the incidence and spectrum of thromboembolic events experienced by patients with moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction in normal sinus rhythm and to study the association between ejection fraction and thromboembolic risk.Background. The annual incidence of thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure is estimated to range from 0.9% to 5.5%. Previous studies demonstrating a relation between worsening left ventricular systolic function and thromboembolic risk are difficult to interpret because of the prevalence of atrial fibrillation, an independent risk factor for thromboembolism, in the patients with a lower ejection fraction.Methods. This is a retrospective analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction prevention and treatment trials data base. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded, resulting in 6,378 participants in sinus rhythm at the time of randomization. Thromboembolic events include strokes, pulmonary emboli and peripheral emboli. Separate analyses were conducted in each gender because there was evidence of a significant interaction between ejection fraction and gender on the risk of thromboembolic events (p = 0.04).Results. The overall annual incidence of thromboembolic events was 2.4% in women and 1.8% in men. On univariate analysis, a decline in ejection fraction was not associated with thromboembolic risk in women (relative risk [RR] per 10% decrease in ejection fraction 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 2.26, p = 0.01), but not in men. On multivariate analysis, a decline in ejection fraction remained independently associated with thromboembolic risk in women (RR per 10% decrease 1.53, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.20, p = 0.02), but no relation was demonstrated in men.Conclusions. In patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm, the annual incidence of thromboembolic events is low. Ejection fraction appears to be independently associated with thromboembolic risk in women, but not in men.(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1074–80)© 1997 by the American College of Cardiology     

Appropriateness of digoxin use in medical outpatients

PURPOSE: Digoxin is the third most commonly prescribed drug, yet limited information exists about its use in outpatients. Therefore, 242 medical outpatients receiving digoxin at our hospital were studied to evaluate the appropriateness of its use, defined by: (1) current or past supraventricular arrhythmias and/or (2) left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 45 percent). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Charts of 242 patients receiving digoxin were obtained. The patients were divided into groups based upon their physician's stated indication for digoxin therapy. Patients with only a clinical diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) underwent echocardiography or radionuclide angiography to quantify left ventricular systolic function. Those with documented supraventricular arrhythmias and/or those with confirmed left ventricular systolic dysfunction were classified as appropriate candidates for digoxin. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of patients received digoxin for appropriate indications; 75 percent had confirmed supraventricular arrhythmias (27 percent also had CHF) and 20 percent with normal sinus rhythm had documented systolic dysfunction. However, physicians had difficulty in the clinical assessment of left ventricular function; 18 percent of patients with sinus rhythm and CHF by the Framingham scoring system and 20 percent of those with supraventricular arrhythmias and CHF had preserved systolic function. An S3 was present in 15 percent of patients with preserved ejection fraction and CHF and in 69 percent with low ejection fraction; hypertension was significantly more common in the former group. Noninvasive assessment of systolic function was obtained in 97 percent of patients independent of this study, yet some patients without supraventricular arrhythmias and with documented preservation of systolic function continued to receive the drug. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular function, which appears to have become routine, is of value in the appropriate utilization of digoxin, since clinicians' assessment of left ventricular function may be inaccurate. Physicians also do not always discontinue digoxin therapy when indicated.     

Review of randomized trials of digoxin therapy in patients with chronic heart failure.

Although digitalis glycosides were introduced in the treatment of cardiac maladies greater than 200 years ago, controversy persists regarding the precise role of digoxin in any multidrug approach to the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). Despite its widespread use for more than 2 centuries, only recently have double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of digoxin therapy been conducted in patients with moderate CHF and sinus rhythm. These trials demonstrate that digoxin is superior to placebo in improving left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, increasing exercise capacity, and preventing CHF worsening. Digoxin produces benefits similar to those seen with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with regard to clinical compensation and improvement in LV function. However, improved survival is demonstrated only in response to ACE inhibitors. The recently completed RADIANCE study addresses the value of combining digoxin with ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate CHF. Because increased mortality has been reported with the newer oral inotropic agents, it currently appears that digoxin is the only oral inotropic agent useful in clinical practice in the treatment of CHF. However, the effects of digoxin on mortality in patients with CHF remain unknown. In the large, double-blind, randomized trial conducted by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the effects of digoxin on mortality in patients with CHF and already being treated with ACE inhibitors are currently being evaluated. Presently, based on the results of placebo-controlled studies, it appears that digoxin, alone or in combination with ACE inhibitors, is beneficial in patients with any signs or symptoms of CHF due to systolic LV dysfunction.     

Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: rate and rhythm management

The goals of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) arrhythmia management are to alleviate patient symptoms, improve patient quality of life, and minimize the morbidity associated with AF and AFL. Arrhythmia management usually commences with drugs to slow the ventricular rate. The addition of class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs for restoration or maintenance of sinus rhythm is largely determined by patient symptoms and preferences. For rate control, treatment of persistent or permanent AF and AFL should aim for a resting heart rate of <100 beats per minute. Beta-blockers or nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are the initial therapy for rate control of AF and AFL in most patients without a history of myocardial infarction or left ventricular dysfunction. Digoxin is not recommended as monotherapy for rate control in active patients. Digoxin and dronedarone may be used in combination with other agents to optimize rate control. The first-choice antiarrhythmic drug for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with non structural heart disease can be any one of dronedarone, flecainide, propafenone, or sotalol. In patients with abnormal ventricular function but left ventricular ejection fraction >35%, dronedarone, sotalol, or amiodarone is recommended. In patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, amiodarone is the only drug usually recommended. Intermittent antiarrhythmic drug therapy ("pill in the pocket") may be considered in symptomatic patients with infrequent, longer-lasting episodes of AF or AFL as an alternative to daily antiarrhythmic therapy. Referral for ablation of AF may be considered for patients who remain symptomatic after adequate trials of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and in whom a rhythm control strategy remains desired.     

Echocardiographic patterns and prognosis in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: There are many variables with prognostic value in patients with heart failure (HF). Those related to left ventricular function are among the most important. Recently, the evaluation of the patterns of ventricular filling by pulsed Doppler echocardiography has been studied as a variable with prognostic value. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic value of echocardiography variables (diastolic and systolic) in patients with HF. These variables were analysed in respect to hospital admission for cardiovascular reasons or death. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 157 consecutive patients with HF and included 110 patients who were in sinus rhythm. The mean age was 68.2 +/- 0.9 years. HF was ischemic in 52.7%. Patients underwent echocardiography examination within the week of reference. The patients were grouped according to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction < 40%). We also classified patients in two groups according to the presence of a restrictive pattern in diastolic transmitral flow profile. Finally, we classified all patients in four groups according to their systolic function and diastolic pattern: Group I--systolic dysfunction and restrictive ventricular filling pattern. Group II--systolic dysfunction without restrictive ventricular filling pattern. Group III--without systolic dysfunction with restrictive ventricular filling pattern. Group IV--without systolic dysfunction without restrictive ventricular filling pattern. The events were death or hospital admission. The mean follow up time was 625 +/- 55 days. We did a statistical analysis and for all tests a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We found impaired LV systolic function (systolic HF) in 73.6% and restrictive ventricular filling pattern in 45.5%. During the follow-up 41.8% died or were admitted to hospital. Patients with systolic HF had lower admission free survival rate. Patients with restrictive ventricular filling pattern had lower admission free survival rate than those without. Group I had lower admission free survival rate than Group II and Group IV. Group IV had a higher admission free survival than all other Groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results support and expand previous observations that diastolic function variables, such as the pattern of ventricular filling (namely the restrictive) have independent prognostic value in patients with HF.     

"Diastolic" heart failure and pulsed pressure

Cardiac failure is the leading cause of hospital admission after 65 years of age. Several studies have confirmed the frequency of cardiac failure with normal systolic function ("diastolic" cardiac failure) in the elderly (nearly half the cases). The cause is commonly isolated systolic hypertension. The pulsed pressure depends on ventricular ejection, arterial rigidity and the precocity of reflected pulse waves. In the elderly, the pulse pressure is a powerful predictive factor for mortality and adverse cardiovascular events (acute coronary syndromes, cardiac failure and cerebrovascular accidents). Patients with isolated systolic hypertension or an increased pulsed pressure usually have left ventricular hypertrophy or concentric remodelling, abnormal relaxation, alteration of hypertrophied myocytes with increased myocardial oxygen consumption and subendocardial ischaemia, especially when the coronary reserve is reduced. The decrease of the diastolic blood pressure reduces the presence of coronary perfusion. Moreover, an increase in the pulsed pressure predisposes to coronary atherosclerosis. These patients are very symptomatic on exercise because they do not have a reserve of preload and easily develop acute pulmonary oedema after a volume overload (increased salt intake, postoperative rehydratation). A recent study showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved during acute pulmonary oedema of hypertensive patients. The diagnosis of "diastolic" cardiac failure is often suspected by elimination (clinical signs of cardiac failure with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction), and echographers have proposed many criteria to detect abnormal relaxation, filling or distensibility of the left ventricle. Mortality would seem to be half that of systolic cardiac failure. Treatment should normalise the hypertension, ischaemia, tachycardia, and maintain or reestablish sinus rhythm, but it remains empirical.