Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of atracurium and vecuronium neuromuscular blockade

To determine the potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by atracurium and vecuronium, dose-response curves were constructed for both antagonists when given at 10% spontaneous recovery of first twitch height. Ninety ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults were given either 0.4 mg/kg atracurium or 0.08 mg/kg vecuronium during thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg/kg) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another ten subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. Assisted recovery was defined as actual recovery minus mean spontaneous recovery observed in patients who were not given antagonists. First twitch recovery was initially more rapid when vecuronium was antagonized compared with atracurium, but no difference was detected after 10 min. At 10 min the neostigmine ED80 was 0.022 +/- 0.003 (SEM) mg/kg after atracurium and 0.024 +/- 0.003 mg/kg after vecuronium. The edrophonium ED80 was 0.44 +/- 0.11 mg/kg with atracurium and 0.46 +/- 0.12 mg/kg with vecuronium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio of 20. Atracurium train-of-four fade could be antagonized more easily with edrophonium, whereas that of vecuronium was more easily antagonized by neostigmine. It is concluded that edrophonium and neostigmine are not equally effective against atracurium and vecuronium.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine and edrophonium for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade

Neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 were administered to two groups of 15 patients each for antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 20% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. The mean onset of action (+/-SEM) of edrophonium (18.1 +/- 2.4 sec) was significantly more rapid (P less than 0.01) than that of neostigmine (47.6 +/- 4 sec), as were the times taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.25 and 0.5. Nevertheless, the reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the antagonist until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was significantly shorter (P less than 0.01) in the neostigmine than in the edrophonium group (499.3 +/- 62 vs 767 +/- 52 sec respectively). The TOF ratio ten minutes after reversal was greater in the neostigmine group than in the edrophonium group (P less than 0.01), 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs 0.68 +/- 0.02 min respectively. At that time, 33% (5 out of 15) and 80% (12 out of 15) patients failed to be reversed adequately (TOF ratio of 0.75) after neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 and edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. Administration of one additional dose (one-third of the initial dose) of the same antagonist resulted in adequate antagonism in the remaining five patients in the neostigmine group and in nine patients in the edrophonium group. Two such doses were required in the remaining three patients in the latter group. The mean total dose of neostigmine and edrophonium employed in this study was 0.067 +/- 0.002 and 1.3 +/- 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early and late reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium with neostigmine in adults and children.

We investigated the influence of the timing of neostigmine administration on recovery from rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade. Eighty adults and 80 children were randomized to receive 0.45 mg/kg rocuronium or 0.075 mg/kg vecuronium during propofol/fentanyl/N2O anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored by train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and adductor pollicis electromyography. Further randomization was made to control (no neostigmine) or reversal with 0.07 mg/kg neostigmine/0.01 mg/kg glycopyrrolate given 5 min after relaxant, or first twitch (T1) recovery of 1%, 10%, or 25%. Another eight adults and eight children received 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine. At each age, spontaneous recovery of T1 and TOF was similar after rocuronium and vecuronium administration but was more rapid in children (P < 0.05). Spontaneous recovery to TOF0.7 after rocuronium and vecuronium administration in adults was 45.7 +/- 11.5 min and 52.5 +/- 15.6 min; in children, it was 28.8 +/- 7.8 min and 34.6 +/- 9.0 min. Neostigmine accelerated recovery in all reversal groups (P < 0.05) by approximately 40%, but the times from relaxant administration to TOF0.7 were similar and independent of the timing of neostigmine administration. Recovery to T1 90% after succinylcholine was similar in adults (9.4 +/- 5.0 min) and children (8.4 +/- 1.1 min) and was shorter than recovery to TOF0.7 in any reversal group after rocuronium or vecuronium administration. Recovery from rocuronium and vecuronium blockade after neostigmine administration was more rapid in children than in adults. Return of neuromuscular function after reversal was not influenced by the timing of neostigmine administration. These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Implications: These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Although spontaneous and neostigmine-assisted recovery is more rapid in children than in adults, in neither is return of function as rapid as after succinylcholine administration.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of atracurium and cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block

PURPOSE: To study the dose-response relationships for neostigmine and edrophonium during antagonism of neuromuscular block induced by atracurium and cisatracurium. METHODS: One hundred and twenty eight, ASA group 1 or 2 adults were given either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) atracurium or 0.1 mg x kg(-1) cisatracurium during fentanyl-thiopental-nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia. The neuromuscular block was measured by an acceleration-responsive transducer. Responses were defined in terms of percent depression in the first twitch (T1) and train-of-four (TOF) response. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg x kg(-1)) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg x kg(-1)) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another sixteen subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. RESULTS: At five minutes, unlike edrophonium, neostigmine was equally effective against atracurium and cisatracurium with respect to T1 recovery. The neostigmine T1-ED50 was 10.3 +/- 1.06 (SEM) microg x kg(-1) after atracurium and 11.2 +/- 1.06) microg x kg(-1) after cisatracurium. The edrophonium ED50 was 157 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with atracurium and 47.4 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with cisatracurium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 15.2 +/- 1.7 and 4.2 +/- 0.41 (P < 0.001) for atracurium and cisatracurium, respectively. At 10 min neostigmine was 13 +/- 1.4 times as potent as edrophonium for achieving 50% TOF recovery after atracurium paralysis. After cisatracurium the potency ratio was 11.8 +/- 1.3 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences at five minutes, neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios at 10 min, were similar in both relaxants studied.     

Tactile evaluation of train-of-four count as an indicator of reliability of antagonism of vecuronium- or atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Recent evidence suggests that edrophonium is not the agent of choice to reverse profound neuromuscular blockade but remains an efficacious drug when the level of neuromuscular blockade to be antagonized is modest. We studied 90 healthy adults in an attempt to address the questions: 1) How much variability in such neuromuscular parameters as single twitch height and the train-of-four (TOF) fade ratio (T4/T1) exist when the TOF count first returns to four palpable responses? 2) Is edrophonium a reliable antagonist at this measured point of recovery? 3) What is the optimal dose of edrophonium needed to produce prompt (less than 10 min) and satisfactory (T4/T1 greater than 0.7) reversal when the fourth response of the thumb to indirect TOF stimulation just becomes palpable? Patients were given a bolus atracurium or vecuronium (n = 45 in each group) followed by an iv infusion sufficient to maintain single twitch as measured by electromyography at 10-15% of control values. At the end of surgery, the infusion was terminated and spontaneous recovery was allowed to begin. Once the tactile TOF count was four, edrophonium 0.3, 0.5, or 0.75 mg/kg was administered. At a count-of-four the first twitch averaged 37% of control (+/- 8.5% standard deviation; pooled data from all groups) and the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.14 +/- 0.049. After atracurium neuromuscular blockade, edrophonium 0.3 mg/kg produced adequate antagonism in 10 min. At this time the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.79 +/- 0.07 and the lowest observed value was 0.67. Increasing the edrophonium dose to 0.75 mg/kg accelerated recovery by 4-5 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recovery times following edrophonium and neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium steady-state infusions

The ability of edrophonium and neostigmine to antagonize nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by steady-state infusions of atracurium, pancuronium, and vecuronium was studied in 71 adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and halothane. Infusion rates of blocking drugs were adjusted so that single twitch depression as measured by the evoked integrated EMG of the hypothenar muscles was kept at 10% of control. Two minutes after the termination of the infusion either edrophonium (0.75 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Single twitch depression and train-of-four (T4/T1) fade was recorded during the recovery period. T4/T1 fade ratios observed at 20 min postreversal were 0.80 (atracurium-edrophonium); 0.76 (vecuronium-edrophonium); 0.44 (pancuronium-edrophonium); 0.95 (atracurium-neostigmine); 0.89 (vecuronium-neostigmine); and 0.68 (pancuronium-neostigmine). Under conditions of this study neostigmine produced more rapid and complete recovery than did edrophonium. Although edrophonium produced adequate antagonism of atracurium if 20-30 min were allowed to elapse, edrophonium reversal of pancuronium was rarely acceptable even at 30 min. Increasing the dose of edrophonium to 1.0 mg/kg produced single twitch values of 0.90 at 5 min postreversal but did not increase the rate of recovery of the train-of-four fade ratio. Neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, on the other hand, generally produced T4/T1 ratios of greater than 0.70 in 20-30 min. Although the pattern of recovery seen after reversal of vecuronium was in general quite similar to that seen after atracurium, two patients in the vecuronium-edrophonium group showed delayed recovery and also failed to respond significantly to subsequent doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine,pyridostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of deep pancuronium blockade

To compare the ability of equipotent doses of neostigmine, pyridostigmine and edrophonium to antagonize intense pancuronium neuromuscular blockade, one hundred and twenty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery received 0.06 mg.kg-1 pancuronium during a thiopentone nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. In the first 60 patients, spontaneous recovery was allowed until ten per cent of initial first twitch height. Then neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg.kg-1), pyridostigmine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1 or 0.2 mg.kg-1), or edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg.kg-1) was injected by random allocation. Dose-response relationships were established from the measurement of first twitch height (T1) ten minutes later. From these, neostigmine, 0.04 and 0.08 mg.kg-1 was found to be equipotent to pyridostigmine, 0.2 and 0.38 mg.kg-1, and edrophonium, 0.54 and 1.15 mg.kg-1, respectively. These doses were given by random allocation to the next 60 patients, but at one per cent spontaneous recovery. Neostigmine, 0.04 mg.kg-1, produced a T1 of 73 +/- 4 per cent (mean +/- SEM), and a train-of-four ratio (TOF) of 39 +/- 3 per cent. This was significantly greater than with pyridostigmine, 0.2 mg.kg-1 (T1 = 50 +/- 6 per cent; TOF = 25 +/- 3 per cent), and edrophonium, 0.54 mg.kg-1 (T1 = 54 +/- 3 per cent; TOF = 17 +/- 2 per cent).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Edrophonium and Neostigmine for Reversal of the Neuromuscular Blocking Effect of Vecuronium

The effect of edrophonium for reversal of the non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by a continuous infusion of vecuronium was compared to that of neostigmine in 20 adult patients during neurolept anaesthesia. When antagonism was attempted at 10% twitch height recovery, reversal time to a train-of-four ratio of 0.7 was significantly shorter following neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg than after edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg (9.8 min and 18.7 min, respectively) but the same after edrophonium 1.5 mg/kg (10.3 min). There was no statistically significant difference in reversal time between neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg given at 10% twitch height and edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg given at 25% twitch height recovery (6.0 min). Additional doses of atropine were necessary following edrophonium 1.5 mg/kg.     

Can early administration of neostigmine, in single or repeated doses, alter the course of neuromuscular recovery from a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade?

The authors sought to determine whether neostigmine, given at a time when no response to peripheral nerve stimulation could be elicited, hastened recovery from a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The effect of neostigmine (70 micrograms/kg) in antagonizing a profound (no-twitch) vecuronium-induced (0.1 mg/kg) NMB in 40 healthy patients was studied. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups specifying the sequence of neostigmine administration. Fifteen minutes after the administration of vecuronium, when there was no detectable twitch response, each patient received either neostigmine (70 micrograms/kg) with glycopyrrolate (15 micrograms/kg) or an equivalent volume of normal saline (placebo). When T1 (the first response in the train-of-four [TOF] sequence) recovered to 10% of control, patients again received either neostigmine with glycopyrrolate in the same doses as before or the placebo. The following variables were measured: times from vecuronium injection until T1 recovered to 10% (t [10]) and 90% (t [90]) of control, and time until the TOF ratio was equal to 75% (t [TOF75]). Mean values of t (90) and t (TOF75) were shorter (54.7-75.2 min and 60.4-79.5 min, respectively) for the three groups who received neostigmine as compared with patients who received two doses of placebo (104.3 and 122.6 min, respectively). There were no differences in the t (90) and t (TOF75) values among the three groups who received neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Accidental epidural administration of vecuronium

We report a case of accidental epidural injection of vecuronium during cholecystectomy in a 55-year-old man (63 kg, 158 cm). Following 3 ml of lidocaine 1% as an epidural test dose, inadvertent epidural (T7-8) injection of vecuronium 4.25 mg instead of ropivacaine occurred. After immediate removal of the syringe containing vecuronium, 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% was injected epidurally. Intubation was performed under propofol infusion using a target-controlled infusion system with intravenous vecuronium 10 mg. There was a 3 min interval between inadvertent epidural and intravenous injection of vecuronium. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol infusion (2.6-3.0 microg x ml(-1)) titrated to maintain bispectral index between 35-55 and buprenorphine 0.16 mg with 40% oxygen in air. T1 response in the train-of-four (TOF) appeared 87 min after epidural vecuronium injection. Ten minutes later, additional vecuronium 0.5mg was required due to bucking. Seven minutes after that, T1 in the TOF reappeared and the operation was finished. Twenty-three minutes after the additional vecuronium, 4 responses in the TOF were obtained. Following reversal with atropine 1.0 mg and neostigmine 2.0 mg, the patient was able to sustain head lift and handgrip, and to protrude the tongue fully awake. The patient was extubated 124 min after epidural vecuronium injection. There was no memory of back pain during epidural vecuronium injection. There was no postoperative respiratory insufficiency or neurological disorder. We suspect the duration of action of epidural vecuronium is approximately twice that of intravenous injection and becomes prolonged with higher doses and advanced age.     

Recovery from vecuronium neuromuscular blockade following neostigmine administration in infants, children, and adults during halothane anesthesia

To determine whether neostigmine had different effects in pediatric patients during vecuronium neuromuscular blockade, the rate of recovery following neostigmine administration was compared in infants (n = 8), children (n = 10), and adults (n = 10) during nitrous oxide-halothane anesthesia. After induction of anesthesia, patients received 100 micrograms/kg of vecuronium. The EMG response of the adductor pollicis was monitored after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve every 20 s. When the first twitch of TOF spontaneously recovered to 10% of control value, neostigmine was injected (40 micrograms/kg in adults, 30 micrograms/kg in infants and children). During the first few minutes following neostigmine administration, no differences were observed between the three groups. After the 8 min, recovery was more rapid in children than in infants and adults up to and including the 15th min. Ten minutes after neostigmine administration, the first twitch (mean +/- SD) reached 97 +/- 3%, 99 +/- 2%, and 97 +/- 5% of control value in infants, children, and adults, respectively; TOF ratio was greater in children (0.96 +/- 0.03) than in either adults (0.82 +/- 0.17) or in infants (0.83 +/- 0.14) (P less than 0.05). During the first minutes after neostigmine administration, the lack of difference in TOF recovery in the three groups suggests that neostigmine is the main factor of recovery. In contrast, the more complete recovery after the eighth minute in children could be due to the faster rate of spontaneous recovery from vecuronium induced neuromuscular blockade in children.     

Mild intraoperative hypothermia increases duration of action and spontaneous recovery of vecuronium blockade during nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia in humans.

We compared the duration of action and recovery times for vecuronium in normothermic and mildly hypothermic patients. Ten patients were actively cooled to a central body temperature near 34.5 degrees C, and ten were maintained at a normothermic central temperature (greater than 36.5 degrees C); temperature was measured in the distal esophagus. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg was administered as an intravenous (iv) bolus to all patients, and the evoked mechanical response to train-of-four stimulation was recorded. Five hypothermic and five normothermic patients were allowed to recover spontaneously. In the remaining five in each group, neostigmine (40 micrograms/kg) and atropine (20 micrograms/kg) was administered when the first twitch (T1) height spontaneously recovered to 10% of control (T1 = 10% of the pre-vecuronium twitch tension). Vecuronium's duration of action (from injection of drug until T1 = 10%) was 28 +/- 4 and 62 +/- 8 min during normothermia and hypothermia, respectively (P less than 0.05). The corresponding values for spontaneous recovery from T1 = 10% to TOF ratio greater than 75% were 37 +/- 15 and 80 +/- 24 min (P less than 0.05), and for neostigmine-induced recovery were 10 +/- 3 and 16 +/- 11 min (difference not significant). We conclude that mild hypothermia increases the duration of action of and time for spontaneous recovery from vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of moderate and profound atracurium blockade

To measure the ability of neostigmine and edrophonium to reverse moderate and profound atracurium blockade, dose-response relationships were established for these reversal agents given at 1% and 10% twitch height recovery. Eighty-five ASA I and II adult patients received atracurium, 0.4 mg/kg, during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 seconds, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. Edrophonium, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg; neostigmine, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg; or no reversal agent was given when there was either 1% or 10% recovery of the first twitch response. With profound blockade, the slope of the edrophonium dose-response relationship was significantly flatter (P less than 0.05) than that of neostigmine. The dose of neostigmine required to achieve 80% first twitch recovery (ED80) after 10 minutes was 0.013 +/- 0.003 mg/kg (mean +/- SEM) if given at 10% recovery, and 0.032 +/- 0.004 mg/kg if given at 1% recovery. The ED80 for edrophonium was 0.22 +/- 0.04 mg/kg and 1.14 +/- 0.33 mg/kg, respectively. These values corresponded to neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 16.6 +/- 3.5 and 35.3 +/- 8.9 at 90% and 99% blockade respectively (P less than 0.006). We conclude that the relative potency of neostigmine is greater than that of edrophonium for antagonism of profound atracurium blockade.     

Nicorandil accelerates recovery of neuromuscular block caused by vecuronium

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of nicorandil, a K ATP channel agonist, on neuromuscular block caused by vecuronium in patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide, oxygen, isoflurane, and fentanyl. METHODS: Sixty adult patients were allocated to four groups of 15: nicorandil-post-tetanic count (N-PTC), nicorandil-train-of-four (N-TOF), control-post-tetanic count (C-PTC) or control-train-of-four (C-TOF) group. In the N-PTC and N-TOF groups, 0.1 mg kg nicorandil was given as a bolus followed by an infusion at 1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Two minutes after the bolus, 0.1 mg x kg(-1) vecuronium was administered. In the C-PTC or C-TOF group normal saline was given instead of nicorandil. PTC and TOF responses were measured mechanically using a force displacement transducer. RESULTS: Time from the administration of vecuronium to the onset of neuromuscular block in the N-PTC or N-TOF group did not differ from that in the C-PTC or C-TOF group (241 +/- 33 vs 225 +/- 32 sec, mean +/- SD). Times from vecuronium injection to the return of PTC in the N-PTC and C-PTC groups, and those of T1, T2, T3, and T4 (first, second, third, and fourth stimulation of TOF) in the N-TOF and C-TOF groups did not differ. Recoveries of PTC in the N-PTC and C-PTC groups followed similar time course. T1/control twitch height and TOF ratio (T4/T1) in the N-TOF group were higher than those in the C-TOF group 80-120 min and 100-120 min after administration of vecuronium, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nicorandil accelerates recovery of neuromuscular block caused by vecuronium.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

Intubating conditions after pipecuronium bromide: the influence of dose and time.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the intubating conditions following the administration of pipecuronium bromide in doses of two (0.07 mg/kg) or three (0.1 mg/kg) times ED95 (average dose that gives 95% block of the first twitch). DESIGN: To compare intubating conditions at 11/2 and 21/2 minutes in 41 patients receiving balanced anesthesia. SETTING: Surgical patients at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-one patients undergoing surgical procedure who received general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: After obtaining a stable baseline of train-of-four (TOF), 41 patients randomly received either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg of pipecuronium as a single intravenous (IV) bolus dose, and the trachea was intubated either at 11/2 or 21/2 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intubating conditions at 21/2 minutes appeared significantly better than those at 11/2 minutes, regardless of the pipecuronium dose. The mean time for T1 (first twitch of TOF) to reach 50% and 90% suppression was 1.36 +/- 0.51 minutes and 2.29 +/- 0.8 minutes, respectively, for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 1.07 +/- 0.27 minutes and 1.72 +/- 0.45 minutes, respectively, for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. This did not make a significant difference in intubating conditions at either time. The time to 25% recovery of T1 was 68.2 +/- 22 minutes for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 121.5 +/- 49 minutes for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. In patients who had spontaneous recovery of T1 to between 10% and 25% of control, administration of neostigmine or edrophonium resulted in identical recovery in 10 minutes. However, in patients with less than 10% spontaneous recovery of T1, neostigmine appeared to be superior to edrophonium. CONCLUSION: Pipecuronium has a relatively rapid onset. The trachea could be intubated successfully in 11/2 minutes with a dose of either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg. If the clinical situation requires perfect relaxation with no movement or bucking, we recommend waiting at least 21/2 minutes.     

Antagonism of vecuronium paralysis: comparison between edrophonium and neostigmine.

The reversal of vecuronium paralysis was studied in three series of anesthetized (methohexital, fentanyl, N2O/O2) informed adult patients receiving either 40 micrograms/kg neostigmine (NEO40) (n = 6), either 500 micrograms/kg edrophonium (EDRO500) (n = 6) or 1000 micrograms/kg edrophonium (EDRO1000) (n = 6). These drugs were given randomly once the adductor pollicis twitch height regained 10% of its initial value. The neuromuscular transmission recovery was assessed during 15 minutes after the antagonist administration, by recording twitch height (TH), train of four--2 Hz--every 3 minutes (TOF Ratio) and finally tetanic fade--50 Herz (TET50) and 100 Hz (TET100), 5 seconds duration, one minute apart--. At 15 minutes, the TH values (mean +/- SEM) were for EDRO500 92% +/- 7, for EDRO1000 93% +/- 3 and for NEO40 100% +/- 4 percent (n.s.). For the TOF Ratio, a statistical difference (p less than 0.05) was found between NEO40 86% +/- 4 and the two other groups: EDRO500 73% +/- 3, EDRO1000 69% +/- 4. For the TET50, the values were: EDRO500 93% +/- 3, EDRO1000 86% +/- 5 and NEO40 94% +/- 2 (n.s.). At 100 Hz, the values were: NEO40 61% +/- 8, EDRO500 43 +/- 151 and EDRO1000 31 +/- 12 (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, in the conditions studied, 40 micrograms/kg neostigmine restores the neuromuscular transmission of the adductor pollicis at a higher level than edrophonium 500 micrograms/kg does. Edrophonium, 1000 micrograms/kg instead of 500 micrograms/kg does not change the neuromuscular transmission recovery.     

Clinical use of vecuronium (ORG NC 45) in balanced anesthesia. Comparison with pancuronium

In 2 groups of 25 patients 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium (Org NC 45) or pancuronium, according to a randomised basis, was injected during balanced anesthesia (thiopental, fentanyl, dehydrobenzperidol and N2O). Intubation conditions 120 seconds after injection were satisfactory. After intubation, a heart rate increase was present with pancuronium (p less than 0.01), but not with vecuronium (difference: p less than 0.05); heartrate decreased 15 and 30 minutes after injection of vecuronium (p less than 0.01). The clinical duration of action of vecuronium was 32.7 +/- 2.4 min (Mean +/- SEM) and of pancuronium 73.5 +/- 4.8 min (p less than 0.01). Successive maintenance doses of 0.025 mg/kg of vecuronium had a duration of action of 23.1 +/- 1.7, 26.8 +/- 2.1, 27.6 +/- 4.0 and 24.0 +/- 2.8 min (diff. NS), showing no cumulative activity. The duration of action of identical doses of pancuronium were 56.9 +/- 3.1, 52.1 +/- 7.2 and 61.3 +/- 17.6 min (diff. NS), values nearly +/- 220% above those of vecuronium (p less than 0.01). Reversion of neuromuscular blockade after vecuronium with small amounts of neostigmine was clinically adequate.     

Reversal of rapacuronium block during propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia

We studied the antagonism of rapacuronium with edrophonium-atropine during propofol- or sevoflurane- based anesthesia in 60 healthy outpatients. After the induction of anesthesia with standardized doses of propofol and fentanyl, rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Patients were randomized to receive either a propofol infusion (100 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) or sevoflurane (1.0%, end-tidal) in combination with nitrous oxide 66% for maintenance of anesthesia. Neuromuscular block was monitored by using electromyography at the wrist and reversed with edrophonium 1.0 mg/kg and atropine 0.015 mg/kg when the first twitch (T(1)) response of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation recovered to 25% of the baseline value. The clinical duration of action (i.e., time to 25% T(1) recovery) was similar during both propofol (13.1 +/- 3.6 min) and sevoflu-rane (13.7 +/- 4.4 min) anesthesia. The time from 25% T(1) recovery to TOF ratio of 0.8 was also similar with propofol (3.4 +/- 2.1 min) and sevoflurane (5.9 +/- 8.7 min) (P > 0.05). Although none of the patients in the propofol group required more than 9 min to achieve a TOF ratio of 0. 8, two patients receiving sevoflurane required 31 min and 37 min. Adequate antagonism of rapacuronium block with edrophonium can be achieved within 10 min during propofol anesthesia. However, more prolonged recovery may occur in the presence of sevoflurane. Implications: We studied the reversal of rapacuronium-induced block with edrophonium and found that the residual rapacuronium block can be readily antagonized during propofol-based anesthesia. However, reversal of rapacuronium appears to be less predictable during sevoflurane-based anesthesia.