Minimally invasive surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: systematic review

HYPOTHESIS: Use of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy techniques, either unilateral or endoscopic, will result in the same or improved safety and efficacy outcomes as those of the bilateral open neck exploration technique in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. DATA SOURCES: Studies on minimally invasive parathyroid surgery were identified using MEDLINE (January 1984 to August 1998), EMBASE (January 1974 to August 1998), and Current Contents (week 1 of 1993 to week 34 of 1998). The search terms were as follows: ((endoscop* or (minimal* and invasive) or unilateral) and parathyroid). The Cochrane Library was searched from issue 1 of 1966 to issue 3 of 1998, using the search terms "parathyroidectomy or parathyroid resection." STUDY SELECTION: Human studies of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism using unilateral or endoscopic exploration were included. Animal studies describing minimally invasive technique development were also included. A surgeon (R.F.P.) and researcher (W.J.B.) independently assessed the retrieved articles for their inclusion in the review. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies directly comparing the unilateral method with bilateral open neck exploration were used to analyze outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Analysis of data using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals indicated a tendency to favor the unilateral technique. However, these individual studies generally had large confidence intervals; therefore, preference to the unilateral procedure cannot be espoused with certainty. There is also a selection bias due to the strict enrollment criteria for unilateral surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed role of minimally invasive parathyroid surgery is for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who have unilateral parathyroid pathological features. To assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive techniques, it is suggested that their introduction be monitored as part of a trial in Australia, from which data should be accrued to a register.     

Surgical Treatment of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Description of Techniques and Advances in the Field

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a disease commonly seen in patients above 60 years of age. It is the most common cause of asymptomatic or symptomatic hypercalcemia, usually found incidentally on routine check-ups. Surgical treatment is the only definitive treatment of choice in the symptomatic patient; however, it can also be employed in asymptomatic patients. First described in 1925, bilateral neck exploration is the gold standard of treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism. The recent interest in minimally invasive surgeries has led to better and improved techniques of neck exploration with improved cosmetic results and lesser chances of transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism due to inadvertent removal of normally functioning parathyroid tissue. These include unilateral neck explorations, minimally invasive parathyroidectomies and minimally invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy. The intact parathyroid hormone assays have greatly added to the detection of normal and abnormal functioning glands, hence better surgical outcomes.     

Parathyroidectomy: bilateral exploration of the neck vs minimally invasive radioguided treatment

AIM: In the therapy of primary hyperparathyroidism, the first surgical intervention, if efficacious, can remarkably reduce the incidence of persistence and relapses which are approximately about 5%. At present, the surgical approach of choice should involve the bilateral exploration of the neck. METHODS: In the light of the high sensibility (91%) and specificity (98.8%) in the localization of parathyroid adenomas obtained by the parathyroid 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy, we submitted, prospective and at random, between January 2001 and July 2004, 69 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, to a conventional surgical treatment (bilateral exploration of the neck: 35 patients) or minimally-invasive approach (minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy: 34 patients). This method consists of the injection of 50 mCi of 99mTc Sestamibi 2 h before the operation and the execution of parathyroid scintigraphy. When the adenoma is evident, we perform an incision of about 4 cm in the neck, 2 cm over the jugulum and the surgical dissection is guided by a probe showing the emission of gamma rays. RESULTS: The parameters considered in order to compare the 2 groups, i.e. operating time, hospital stay and time of recovery were reduced in a significant way in the group submitted to the minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy (MIRP). There were no complications in the 2 groups. In the follow-up we did not observe cases of persistence or relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, we can confirm that the minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy is a safe and efficacious method as well as the bilateral exploration of the neck. Moreover, cost reduction may convince many surgeons to consider MIRP the in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism.     

Diversification of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy and minimally invasive open videoscopically magnified parathyroidectomy with local anesthesia

With the expansion of minimally invasive parathyroid surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism, new approaches and techniques evolved, creating new surgical algorithms with consequences for indication for surgery and patient selection. The presented methods of selective, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy represent this development of diversification. Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) has advanced to bilateral exploration, avoiding preoperative localization other than ultrasonography. Furthermore, a new technique of minimally invasive open parathyroidectomy with the option of videoscopic magnification under local anesthesia (MIPLA) for localizable adenomas is introduced. A series of 103 patients were operated on for primary hyperparathyroidism using minimally invasive procedures: 87 with MIVAP and 16 with MIPLA. With MIVAP the conversion rate to cervicotomy for multiglandular disease or technical difficulties was 16% (n = 14). With MIPLA, conversion to general intubation anesthesia or additional sedation was necessary in four patients. A transient laryngeal nerve palsy was observed in one patient with MIVAP. Bilateral exploration was carried out during 29 MIVAPs and 2 MIPLAs. The duration of surgery differed, with a median 63 minutes for MIVAP and 39 minutes for MIPLA. Surgery under local anesthesia was completed in 4 patients with MIVAP and in 14 with MIPLA. All patients were cured of primary hyperparathyroidism. Preliminary results of diversified procedures demonstrate effects regarding omission of preoperative diagnostics, overall cost reduction, and increasing patient selection for selective parathyroid surgery because of primary hyperparathyroidism.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring. The first 36 cases and some pitfalls

Background: The success of parathyroid surgery depends on the identification and removal of all hyperactive parathyroid tissue. At this writing, bilateral cervical exploration and identification of all parathyroid glands represent the operative standard for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). However, improved preoperative localization techniques and the availability of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring prepare the way for minimally invasive procedures. Methods: Patients with pHPT and one unequivocally enlarged parathyroid gland on preoperative ultrasound and 99mTc-SestaMIBI scintigraphy underwent minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy by an anterior approach. Intraoperatively, a rapid chemiluminescense immunoassay was used to measure intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels shortly before and then 5, 10, and 15 min after excision of the adenoma. The operation was considered successful when more than a 50% decrease in preexcision iPTH levels was observed after 5 min. Results: Between October 1999 and November 2001, 36 of 82 patients with pHPT were eligible for a minimally invasive approach. A conversion to open surgery became necessary in five patients because of technical problems. In three cases, intraoperative iPTH monitoring showed no sufficient decrease in iPTH values. In these cases, subsequent cervical exploration showed one double adenoma and two hyperplasias, respectively. In two patients we had difficulty interpreting intraoperative iPTH values, resulting in persistent pHPT. Conclusions: Despite the use of high-resolution ultrasound and 99mTc-SestaMIBI scintigraphy, the presence of multiple glandular disease cannot be ruled out completely. Intraoperative iPTH monitoring to ensure operative success is indispensible for a minimally invasive approach. Despite our problems with iPTH monitoring in two patients, we believe that in selected cases, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy represents an attractive alternative to conventional surgery.     

The actual role of classic bilateral cervicotomic approach for primary hyperparathyroidism in the era of minimally invasive surgery

Recent advances in preoperative localisation of parathyroid adenomas and intraoperative prove of complete removal of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue have fostered less invasive operative procedures which directly target the diseased gland. Such strategies have partially replaced the previous gold standard procedure of bilateral neck exploration. We herein report on our own series of 1099 consecutive operations for primary hyperparathyroidism performed in a 16 year period and provide information and arguments for primary bilateral exploration in selected cases. 97.1% of patients were cured by the primary operation. From 1999 through 2001, 200 patients underwent bilateral neck exploration, whereas 63 unilateral operations were performed (33 patients were treated by minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) and 30 by minimally invasive open parathyroidectomy (MIOP). In the remaining 200 patients minimally invasive unilateral parathyroid surgery was not feasible due to concomitant goiter (n = 102), lack of preoperative localisation (n = 30), previous thyroid surgery (n = 10), suspected multiglandular disease (n = 10), or other reasons (n = 8). In 40 patients the decision for bilateral neck exploration was made despite feasibility of a unilateral approach. CONCLUSION: Whereas unilateral exploration produced excellent cure rates in older patients, it is not recommended in patients with a high likelihood of multiglandular disease, presence of a large or multinodular goitre, high PTH levels, giant adenoma, unclear MIBI scans or an unreliable OPTH assay. Contrasting recent reports on a dramatic shift of technique towards minimally invasive procedures unilateral parathyroid surgery may not be preferably advisable in a majority of patients from countries with insufficient iodine supplementation.     

Long-Term Symptom Relief from Primary Hyperparathyroidism Following Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy

Background  

The affect of the surgical approach for primary hyperparathyroidism (1HPT) on long-term symptom relief has not been studied. This study compares the long-term relief of symptoms assessed by the Parathyroidectomy Assessment of Symptoms (PAS) score in patients undergoing bilateral neck exploration (BNE) and minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP).     

Bilateral oblique approach to parathyroid glands

OBJECTIVE: To propose a simple and minimally invasive approach for parathyroid surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive approaches to the parathyroid glands may involve preoperative morphologic explorations, perioperative biologic controls, or videocervicoscopy, a new method. METHODS: The authors describe 597 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy through an original bilateral oblique approach between 1976 and 1997. None underwent morphologic exploration or biologic perioperative monitoring. In primary hyperparathyroidism, the four glands are controlled and it is possible to check their abnormalities of location or number. In secondary hyperparathyroidism and multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN), a total or subtotal parathyroidectomy is performed. RESULTS: The results and vocal morbidity are the same as that from authors using transverse cervicotomy, but this approach is more comfortable for the patient and allows total exploration of the location through short incisions without bleeding, visceral contusions, or muscle lesion. CONCLUSIONS: This cervicotomy is easy and secure even if the surgeon is not trained in this approach because it uses and respects the anatomy of the cervical fasciae. It can be used without preoperative localization, intraoperative monitoring, or specialized material. But this approach could be also proposed for unilateral exploration guided by these methods and for surgical treatment of recurrent hyperparathyroidism after a transverse cervicotomy.     

Limitations of technetium 99m sestamibi scintigraphic localization for primary hyperparathyroidism associated with multiglandular disease

Successful surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism requires the localization and excision of the parathyroid tissue responsible for excessive parathyroid hormone secretion while ensuring that the patient will have sufficient endogenous parathyroid hormone production to maintain eucalcemia. In selecting patients with primary hyperparathyroidism for unilateral parathyroidectomy the surgeon should be able to diagnose multiglandular disease either preoperatively or intraoperatively. We performed a retrospective review of 123 patients who underwent surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism to determine the potential feasibility of selecting patients for minimally invasive surgery based on preoperative imaging studies. All patients were studied preoperatively with 99m technetium-sestamibi scintigraphy. High-resolution ultrasonography was performed in 119 of these patients. All patients except one underwent bilateral cervical exploration. A patient with an intrathoracic adenoma was successfully diagnosed by scintigraphy thereby allowing treatment by a limited thoracotomy. One hundred eight patients had solitary adenomas and 15 had multiglandular disease. In none of the patients with bilateral multiglandular disease were all abnormal glands localized preoperatively. Patients in our study with primary hyperparathyroidism and multiglandular disease were underdiagnosed by preoperative imaging. A minimally invasive approach based solely on preoperative imaging studies may result in treatment failure in patients with multiglandular involvement.     

Radioguided parathyroidectomy via VATS combined with intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing: the surgical approach of choice for patients with mediastinal parathyroid adenomas?

Despite the excellent results with bilateral exploration, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy has become the procedure of choice for patients with hyperparathyroidism in which a single parathyroid lesion can be localized preoperatively. In this article, we discuss a patient who presented with primary hyperparathyroidism for the first time and had a Tc-99m sestamibi scan to localize a single parathyroid lesion in the left, anterior mid-mediastinum. We subsequently performed a radioguided parathyroidectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to resect this parathyroid adenoma and used intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) testing to confirm cure and avoid neck exploration. We concluded that radioguided parathyroidectomy via VATS combined with intraoperative PTH testing is an effective approach for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and mediastinal parathyroid lesions, and perhaps should be the technique of choice.     

Hypocalcemia after neck exploration for untreated primary hyperparathyroidism

Hypocalcemia after neck exploration for hyperparathyroidism is an important postoperative management issue. With increasing acceptance of less invasive surgical approaches, hypocalcemia is less frequent. This study was conducted to evaluate postoperative hypocalcemia after current surgical exploration techniques in patients with untreated primary hyperparathyroidism. From the University of Louisville parathyroid database, charts of patients undergoing surgery for untreated primary hyperparathyroidism from May 1, 1998 to May 30, 2004 were reviewed. Data was analyzed based on age, sex, preoperative calcium and parathyroid hormone levels, preexisting diseases, and extent of neck exploration. One hundred sixty-nine patients were identified with adequate data for analysis. Transient postoperative hypocalcemia occurred in 21 per cent (36/169) for the total group, in 18 per cent (22/125) after minimally invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy, and in 32 per cent (14/44) after bilateral neck exploration. Patients with postoperative hypocalcemia had a statistically significant association with older age and pre-existing hypertension. Patients with postoperative hypocalcemia were more likely to have undergone longer surgical procedures and were more likely to have had pre-existing diabetes and mental disorders. These findings were not statistically significant and were considered trends. The frequency of osteoporosis in the hypocalcemia group was increased but was not significant. Transient hypocalcemia occurred in 21 per cent of patients after parathyroid surgery. It was more likely after bilateral neck exploration, a longer duration of surgery, and with hypertension, diabetes, and mental disorders.     

Endoscopically assisted, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of open parathyroid exploration, minimally invasive alternatives have been emerging. This study reports an experience with endoscopically assisted, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy and evaluates its current role in patients undergoing surgery for hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients requiring surgery for hyperparathyroidism were evaluated. Endoscopic parathyroidectomy was offered based on the absence of coexisting nodular thyroid disease, previous neck surgery or irradiation, suspicion of parathyroid hyperplasia, or other anatomical or medical contraindications. Some 24 of 100 patients fulfilled the criteria and underwent endoscopic parathyroidectomy. Unequivocal localization to a single site by a technetium-99m-radiolabelled sestamibi scan allowed removal of the adenoma through a 25-mm suprasternal incision while being guided by a surgical telescope. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in operating time or the mean size of resected adenomas between patients undergoing endoscopic and open parathyroidectomy. Four patients required conversion to an open procedure. Two patients developed temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis and one had persistent hyperparathyroidism. CONCLUSION: Although endoscopic parathyroidectomy is technically feasible, its applicability is limited to a minority of patients undergoing operation for hyperparathyroidism. The potential for higher complication and failure rates makes optimism for the procedure appropriately guarded.     

Minimally invasive surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present paper was to systematically review the literature regarding the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy techniques in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Studies using unilateral or endoscopic exploration following imaging were compared with bilateral open neck exploration. METHODS: Studies on minimally invasive parathyroid surgery were identified using MEDLINE (1984 to August 1998), EMBASE (1974 to August 1998) and Current Contents (1993 to week 34, 1998). The search terms were ((endoscop* or (minimal* and invasive) or unilateral) and parathyroid). The Cochrane Library was searched from 1966 to issue 3 1998, using the search terms 'parathyroidectomy or parathyroid resection'. Human studies of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism using unilateral or endoscopic exploration were included. Animal studies describing minimally invasive technique development were also included. A surgeon and researcher independently assessed the retrieved articles for their inclusion in the review. Studies directly comparing the unilateral method with bilateral open neck exploration were used to analyse outcomes. RESULTS: Analysis of data using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) indicated a tendency to favour the unilateral technique. These individual studies generally had large CI, however; therefore preference to the unilateral procedure cannot be espoused with certainty. There is also a selection bias due to the strict enrollment criteria for unilateral surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed role of minimally invasive parathyroid surgery is for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who have unilateral parathyroid pathology. To assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive techniques it is suggested that their introduction be monitored as part of a trial in Australia, from which data should be accrued to a register.     

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy Versus Open Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy for a Solitary Parathyroid Adenoma: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial

Background A variety of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) techniques have been currently introduced to surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) caused by a solitary parathyroid adenoma. This study aimed at comparing the video-assisted MIP (MIVAP) and open MIP (OMIP) in a prospective, randomized, blinded trial. Materials and Methods Among 84 consecutive pHPT patients referred for surgery, 60 individuals with concordant localization of parathyroid adenoma on ultrasound and subtraction Tc^99m-MIBI scintigraphy were found eligible for MIP under general anesthesia and were randomized to two groups (n = 30 each): MIVAP and OMIP. An intraoperative intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) assay was routinely used in both groups to determine the cure. Primary end-points were the success rate in achieving the cure from hyperparathyroid state and hypocalcemia rate. Secondary end-points were operating time, scar length, pain intensity assessed by the visual-analogue scale, analgesia request rate, analgesic consumption, quality of life within 7 postoperative days (SF-36), cosmetic satisfaction, duration of postoperative hospitalization, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Results All patients were cured. In 2 patients, an intraoperative iPTH assay revealed a need for further exploration: in one MIVAP patient, subtotal parathyroidectomy for parathyroid hyperplasia was performed with the video-assisted approach, and in an OMIP patient, the approach was converted to unilateral neck exploration with the final diagnosis of double adenoma. MIVAP versus OMIP patients were characterized by similar operative time (44.2 ± 18.9 vs. 49.7 ± 15.9 minutes; P = 0.22), transient hypocalcemia rate (3 vs. 3 individuals; P = 1.0), lower pain intensity at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery (24.9 ± 6.1 vs. 32.2 ± 4.6; 26.4 ± 4.5 vs. 32.0 ± 4.0; 19.6 ± 4.9 vs. 25.4 ± 3.8; 15.5 ± 5.5 vs. 20.4 ± 4.7 points, respectively; P < 0.001), lower analgesia request rate (63.3% vs. 90%; P = 0.01), lower analgesic consumption (51.6 ± 46.4 mg vs. 121.6 ± 50.3 mg of ketoprofen; P < 0.001), better physical functioning aspect and bodily pain aspect of the quality of life on early recovery (88.4 ± 6.9 vs. 84.6 ± 4.7 and 90.3 ± 4.7 vs. 87.5 ± 5.8; P = 0.02 and P = 0.003, respectively), shorter scar length (17.2 ± 2.2 mm vs. 30.8 ± 4.0 mm; P < 0.001), and higher cosmetic satisfaction rate at 1 month after surgery (85.4 ± 12.4% vs. 77.4 ± 9.7%; P = 0.006). Cosmetic satisfaction was increasing with time, and there were no significant differences at 6 months postoperatively. MIVAP was more expensive (US$1,150 ± 63.4 vs. 1,015 ± 61.8; P < 0.001) while the mean hospital stay was similar (28 ± 10.1 vs. 31.1 ± 9.7 hours; P = 0.22). Differences in serum calcium values and iPTH during 6 months of follow-up were nonsignificant. Transient laryngeal nerve palsy appeared in one OMIP patient (P = 0.31). There was no other morbidity or mortality. Conclusions Both MIVAP and OMIP offer a valuable approach for solitary parathyroid adenoma with a similar excellent success rate and a minimal morbidity rate. Routine use of the intraoperative iPTH assay is essential in both approaches to avoid surgical failures of overlooked multiglandular disease. The advantages of MIVAP include easier recognition of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), lower pain intensity within 24 hours following surgery, lower analgesia request rate, lower analgesic consumption, shorter scar length, better physical functioning and bodily pain aspects of the quality of life on early recovery, and higher early cosmetic satisfaction rate. However, these advantages are achieved at higher costs because of endoscopic tool involvement. The paper was presented at the 41st World Congress of Surgery, 21– 25 August 2005, Durban, South Africa.     

自制微创拉钩辅助改良双侧Wiltse入路经椎间孔椎体间融合术在腰椎退行性病变治疗中的应用

目的:探讨自制微创拉钩辅助改良双侧Wiltse入路经椎间孔椎体间融合术(transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion,TLIF)在治疗腰椎退行性病变中的优势.方法:回顾性分析2016年10月至2017年10月行腰椎融合手术的140例患者的临床资料,其中72例患者采用自制微创拉钩辅助改良...     

Multiple-gland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism: a function of operative approach?

HYPOTHESIS: The approach to surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is controversial. To determine whether routine bilateral neck exploration increases the detection of multiple-gland disease compared with a focused unilateral approach, we compared the incidence of single vs multiple-gland disease in patients undergoing surgical treatment for PHPT as a function of unilateral or bilateral exploration. DATA SOURCES: From 1993 through 1997, 214 consecutive patients underwent initial bilateral neck exploration for PHPT by a single surgeon. Each patient underwent the surgical procedure without prior localizing studies. Four parathyroid glands were identified, and abnormal glands were excised. The results were compared with published studies of patients who underwent either bilateral neck exploration or focused unilateral neck exploration for PHPT. STUDY SELECTION: All reported studies from 1995 through 2001 in a MEDLINE search using the terms "parathyroidectomy" or "primary hyperparathyroidism and surgery" and either "bilateral" or "conventional" or "minimally invasive," "selective," or "unilateral." DATA EXTRACTION: The studies were analyzed for numbers of patients and a final diagnosis of either a single adenoma or multiple-gland disease (double adenoma or hyperplasia). Proportions were compared statistically with a chi(2) test. DATA SYNTHESIS: In our series of 214 patients who underwent bilateral neck exploration, 79.4% had a single adenoma, and 20.6% had multiple-gland disease. Of 2166 patients in 14 studies who underwent bilateral neck exploration, 79.7% had a single adenoma, and 19.3% had multiple-gland disease. Of 2095 patients in 31 studies with a focused unilateral approach, 92.5% had a single adenoma, whereas only 5.3% had multiple-gland disease. The incidence of multiple-gland disease was significantly lower among patients treated with a focused unilateral approach compared with a bilateral approach as used in our series and the literature (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The data suggest that a focused unilateral surgical approach for PHPT may underestimate the incidence of multiple-gland disease.     

Outcomes analysis of intraoperative adjuncts during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine whether minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy (MIRP) and intraoperative parathyroid hormone–guided parathyroidectomy (ioPTH) have equivalent intermediate-term outcomes in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT).MethodsA retrospective study of 244 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT in a 25-month time period was conducted. Patients who either underwent MIRP- or ioPTH-guided parathyroidectomies were included. The primary outcome was persistent disease. Conversion to bilateral exploration, complications, and multigland disease (MGD) were secondary outcomes.ResultsThere was 1 MIRP patient and no ioPTH patients who had persistent disease. The ioPTH group had more conversions to a bilateral exploration (bilateral neck exploration [BNE]) (3.7% vs 13%, P = .024). In the MIRP group, no patients were found to have MGD. In the ioPTH group, 7 patients with double adenomas and 6 patients with MGD were found (0 vs 13, P = .0028).ConclusionsioPTH facilitates successful minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) when compared with MIRP and provides cure rates similar to BNE.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy

BACKGROUND: The standard surgical procedure for parathyroidectomy consists of bilateral cervical exploration and the visualization of all four parathyroid glands. However, improved preoperative localization techniques and the availability of intraoperative intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) monitoring now allow single adenomas to be treated with minimally invasive techniques. METHODS: Patients with primary hyperthyroidism (pHPT), who were found to have one unequivocally enlarged parathyroid gland on preoperative ultrasound and 99mTc-SestaMIBI scintigraphy underwent minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy by an anterior approach. Intraoperatively, rapid electrochemiluminescense immunoassay was used to measure iPTH levels shortly before and 5, 10, and 15 mins after excision of the adenoma. The operation was considered successful when a >50% decrease in preexcision iPTH levels was observed after 5 min. RESULTS: Between November 1999 and May 2000, 10 of 22 patients with pHPT were deemed eligible for the minimally invasive approach. In all cases, the adenoma was removed successfully. However, in two cases, intraoperative iPTH monitoring did not show a sufficient decrease in iPTH values. Subsequent cervical exploration revealed a double adenoma in one case and hyperplasia in the other. CONCLUSIONS: Even when high-resolution ultrasound and 99mTc-SestaMIBI scintigraphy are used, the presence of multiple glandular desease cannot be ruled out entirely. When the minimally invasive approach is contemplated, intraoperative iPTH monitoring is indispensible to ensure operative success. However, in selected cases, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy represents an excellent alternative to the conventional technique.     

One hundred consecutive minimally invasive parathyroid explorations

OBJECTIVE: To review the outcomes of 100 consecutive minimally invasive parathyroid explorations. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) has challenged the traditional approach of bilateral neck exploration for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism have a single adenoma that when resected results in cure. It therefore appears logical to perform a directed approach to adenoma extirpation. MIP involves high-quality sestamibi images obtained with single photon emission computed tomography to localize enlarged parathyroid glands in three dimensions, limited exploration after surgeon-administered cervical block anesthesia, rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay to confirm the adequacy of resection, and discharge within 1 to 3 hours of surgery. METHODS: MIP was offered to 100 selected consecutive patients during an 18-month period beginning in March 1998. RESULTS: Ninety-two cases were accomplished under cervical block anesthesia and 89 of these on an ambulatory basis. The cure rate was 100%, and there were no long-term complications. The mean hospital charge for MIP was less than 40% of that associated with traditional exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient MIP appears to be the procedure of choice for most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.     

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: an audit of a change in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) for primary hyperparathyroidism is gaining acceptance as a useful tool in the armamentarium of the endocrine surgeon. METHODS: We undertook an audit of 154 consecutive cases of parathyroidectomy carried out through bilateral neck exploration as well as a minimally invasive approach. RESULTS: Bilateral neck exploration had a 100% single operation cure rate. MIP had a 90% cure rate. Sestamibi localization had a positive predictive value of 99% for identifying an abnormal parathyroid gland. However, it performed poorly in the presence of multiglandular disease, resulting in these patients being at risk of having persistent hyperparathyroidism and therefore requiring a second operation. CONCLUSION: Our results with bilateral neck exploration are favourable compared with other large series. However, we have reported a 10% reoperation rate with MIP. Although not ideal, we are confident that, as a result of improvements based on this audit and with increasing experience, the cure rate will improve to reach international benchmarks. As such we feel that this strategy is a pragmatic way to offer MIP to patients in our region.