Secondary syringe exchange among users of 23 California syringe exchange programs

This article describes the secondary syringe exchange (SSE) practices of injection drug users (IDUs) attending 23 syringe exchange programs (SEPs) in the state of California during 2002 (n=539). The sample was primarily heroin injecting, about two thirds male, half White and half other racial/ethnic groups. Participants were interviewed with a structured questionnaire that included items on sociodemographic factors, drug use practices, sexual practices, use of SEP and other social services, and satisfaction with SEP services. Interviews lasted about 30 minutes. SSE was highly prevalent: 75% of IDUs reported participating in SSE in the 6 months before interview. Program characteristics, such as legal status, SSE policy, and exchange policy, did not affect the prevalence of SSE among SEP clients. Infectious disease risk behaviors were significantly more common among SSE participants than nonparticipants. SSE participants were more likely to share syringes (p<.001) and cookers (p<.001) in the previous 6 months. SSE was significantly associated with being stuck with another person's syringe (needle-stick), a little-discussed "occupational hazard" of this practice. In multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratio of needle-stick among SSE participants was 2.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.3, 6.0). The high prevalence of SSE and the infectious disease risk associated with it warrant additional research to determine the causality of these associations. In the interim, SEPs should consider reinforcing HIV prevention education messages and training IDUs who engage in SSE in safe handling of biohazardous materials.     

Decreased Odds of Injection Risk Behavior Associated With Direct Versus Indirect Use of Syringe Exchange: Evidence From Two California Cities

Background: While there is substantial evidence that syringe exchange programs (SEPs) are effective in preventing HIV among people who inject drugs (PWID), nearly all the evidence comes from PWID who obtain syringes from an SEP directly. Much less is known about the benefits of secondary exchange to PWID who get syringes indirectly from friends or acquaintances who visit an SEP for them. Objectives: We evaluated the effectiveness of direct versus indirect syringe exchange in reducing HIV-related high-risk injecting behavior among PWID in two separate studies conducted in Sacramento and San Jose, California, cities with quite different syringe exchange models. Methods: In both studies associations between direct and indirect syringe exchange and self-reported risk behavior were examined with multivariable logistic regression models. Study 1 assessed effects of a “satellite” home-delivery syringe exchange in Sacramento, while Study 2 evaluated a conventional fixed-site exchange in San Jose. Results: Multivariable analyses revealed 95% and 69% reductions, respectively, in high-risk injection associated with direct use of the SEPs in Sacramento and San Jose, and a 46% reduction associated with indirect use of the SEP in Sacramento. Conclusions/Importance: The very large effect of direct SEP use in Sacramento was likely due in part to home delivery of sterile syringes. While more modest effects were associated with indirect use, such use nevertheless is valuable in reducing the risk of HIV transmission of PWID who are unable or unwilling to visit a syringe exchange.     

Factors Associated With Buying and Selling Syringes Among Injection Drug Users in a Setting of One of North America's Largest Syringe Exchange Programs

We performed analyses of syringe buying and syringe selling among Vancouver injection drug users, recruited from May 1996 and followed up between November 2002 and August 2003, in the context of one of North America's largest syringe exchange programs (SEPs). An interviewer-administered questionnaire, approximately 45 minutes in duration, was used to collect information regarding risk factors for HIV infection and sources of sterile syringes. Seventy participants (15%) reported syringe selling and 122 (26%) reported syringe buying. Syringe sellers were more likely to be female, reside in unstable housing, need help injecting, and have visited the SEP at least once weekly. Syringe buyers were more likely to need help injecting, have difficulty finding new syringes, have binged on drugs, and have visited the SEP at least once weekly. Syringe buying most frequently occurred when the SEP was closed.     

A matter of convenience: factors influencing secondary syringe exchange in Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Distribution of sterile syringes to reduce the circulation of HIV-infection among injection drug user (IDU) communities is vital in curbing the spread of HIV among IDUs. In addition to other methods of distribution, syringe exchange programmes (SEPs) have been shown to be necessary in the dissemination of sterile syringes. Secondary syringe exchange (SSE) is an organic process by which IDUs distribute syringes to other IDUs and is an important complement to SEPs. This paper examines the motivations for people who provide SSE to other IDUs and the reasons why some IDUs do not use the Baltimore Needle Exchange Program (BNEP). Approximately 5000 individuals had obtained clean syringes from the BNEP between 1994 and 1997. In 1997, qualitative interviews were conducted in Baltimore with 20 providers of SSE and 10 SSE recipients who had never used the BNEP. Data from qualitative interviews were transcribed, coded and compiled. SSE providers reported economic gain and altruism as incentives. SSE recipients reported privacy, convenience of location and time, force of habit, and concern for carrying paraphernalia around as reasons influencing them to obtain syringes from secondary syringe exchangers rather than the needle exchange programme. Results from this study illuminate the social context in which SSE occurs and indicate the importance of SSE as a method for distributing sterile syringes.     

Organizational Issues in the Implementation of a Hospital-Based Syringe Exchange Program

Little published information exists to guide health care institutions in establishing syringe exchange program (SEP) services. To address this gap, this article discusses organizational issues encountered in the implementation of a hospital-based SEP in San Francisco, California (USA). Investigators collaborated with a community organization in implementing a county hospital-based SEP. SEP services integrated into a public hospital presented unique challenges directly related to their status as a health care institution. In the course of introducing SEP services into a hospital setting as part of a clinical trial, various ethical, legal, and logistical issues were raised. Based on these experiences, this paper provides guidance on how to integrate an SEP into a traditional health care institution.     

Practices surrounding syringe acquisition and disposal: effects of Syringe Exchange Programmes from different Brazilian regions—the AjUDE-Brasil II Project

The study describes practices relating to syringe acquisition and disposal by Syringe Exchange Programme (SEP) participants. A cross-sectional multi-city study enrolled 857 injection drug users (IDUs) from six SEPs in different Brazilian regions, and assessed self-reported acquisition and disposal behaviours. Seven hundred and nine males (82.9%) and 146 females (17.1%) were recruited through outreach and interviewed, most from the streets or their neighbourhoods (54.1%). The average age was 28.5 years; 76.4% reported injecting cocaine in the past 6 months. Sources for acquiring new syringes differed significantly between time of injection drug use debut and the 6 months prior to interview. Fifty-three percent of IDUs reported acquiring their syringes in pharmacies when they initiated injection drug use, whereas most reported acquiring new syringes in the 6 months before interview from several simultaneous sources: 69% through SEPs; 58% through pharmacies; 36% from friends and/or sexual partners; and 17% from other health services. Across SEPs, acquisition and disposal varied widely. Most interviewees discarded their syringes on the streets, in open fields, or in the garbage or sewage. Restrictions on syringe availability and unsafe practices may be functioning as barriers to the public health recommendation of one-time use of sterile syringes for IDUs and discouraging community support to SEPs. Further increase in access to legal, inexpensive and timely sterile syringes, as well as counselling about the merits of one-time use and safer disposal must be reinforced as part of efforts to minimise high-risk behaviours and curb the spread of blood-borne infections.     

Injection Risk Behavior among Women Syringe Exchangers in San Francisco

Women who inject drugs in cities where syringe exchange programs (SEPs) are well established may have different risks for HIV infection. In 1997, we interviewed 149 female syringe exchangers in San Francisco, CA, a city with high rates of injection drug use that is home to one of the largest and oldest SEPs in the United States. In this report, we describe their sociodemographics, health, and risk behavior, and we examine factors associated with recent syringe sharing. Fifty percent of respondents were women of color and the median age was 38 years. Most (86%) injected heroin and nearly half were currently homeless or had recently been incarcerated. One-third of all women reported needle sharing in the prior month. This was higher than the rate of needle sharing reported by a mixed gender sample of San Francisco exchangers in 1993, although it resembled the rate reported by a mixed gender sample in 1992. In a multivariate analysis, syringe sharing was associated with age, housing status, and sexual partnerships. Syringe sharers were more likely to be young, homeless, or have a sexual partner who was also an injection drug user. While wide access to sterile syringes is an important strategy to reduce HIV transmission among injection drug users (IDU), syringe exchange alone cannot eradicate risky injection by female IDU. Additional efforts to reduce risky injection practices should focus on younger and homeless female IDU, as well as address selective risk taking between sexual partners.     

Racial differences in acquisition of syringes from pharmacies under conditions of legal but restricted sales

BackgroundInjecting drug users (IDUs) are at increased risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV and other bloodborne pathogens through the multi-person use of syringes. Although research has shown that increased access to syringes through syringe exchange programs (SEPs) is an effective strategy to reduce risky injection practices many areas of the United States still do not have SEPs. In the absence of SEPs, legislation allowing pharmacies over-the-counter sales of syringes has also been shown to reduce syringe sharing. The success of pharmacy sales however is limited by other legal stipulations, such as drug paraphernalia laws, which in turn may contribute to fear among IDUs about being caught purchasing and carrying syringes.MethodsBetween 2003 and 2006, 851 out-of-treatment IDUs were recruited using street outreach in the Raleigh-Durham (North Carolina) area. Data were collected using audio-computer assisted interview (ACASI) technology. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with purchasing syringes from pharmacies.ResultsIn our study sample, African-American IDUs were one-fifth as likely as white IDUs to report pharmacies as their primary source of syringes.ConclusionsGiven the absence of syringe exchange programs and the relatively high prevalence of HCV and HIV among IDUs in the Raleigh-Durham area, the limited use of pharmacies as a source of syringes among African-American IDUs in this study sample is problematic. The study findings support the need for effective multilevel interventions to increase access to clean needles in this population, as well as for policy interventions, such as legalization of SEPs and elimination of penalties for carrying syringes, to reduce harm and eliminate the health threats posed by receptive syringe sharing.     

Syringe exchange programs: Impact on injection drug users and the role of the pharmacist from a U.S. perspective

ObjectiveTo present a summary of the existing literature on syringe exchange programs (SEPs) and to discuss the potential role of pharmacists in providing support for injection drug users (IDUs) and such programs.Data sourcesTo identify relevant articles published since 2000, a search of PubMed and Medline was conducted using syringe exchange programs and needle exchange programs as search terms. A manual review of each article's citation list was also conducted.Data extractionBy the authors.Data synthesisInformation is presented in four categories: state and federal support of SEPs, characteristics of SEP users, epidemiological studies, and social reluctance for SEP support. The information summarized in these sections is then used as a foundation for a review of the potential role of the pharmacist.ConclusionSEPs have demonstrated a clear effect in improving the health outcomes of IDUs by decreasing the transmission of blood-borne disease and lowering high-risk injecting behaviors. Despite conflicting support for SEPs at both the federal and local levels, pharmacists can play a pivotal role in the health of IDUs by providing sound medical advice and, in some states, acting as an alternative channel for obtaining clean syringes. Efforts should continue to focus on educating pharmacists about this role and how their individual actions can benefit the health of the entire population.     

What predicts which metropolitan areas in the USA have syringe exchanges?

HIV epidemics among IDUs vary widely across different cities in the USA [American Journal of Public Health 86 (5) (1996) 642]. Few studies have focused on how localities differ in regard to response to the HIV epidemic. While syringe exchange programmes (SEPs) are a response to HIV among IDUs, they are often unwelcome and difficult to set up even in communities hit hardest by the epidemic. It is important to understand what metropolitan area characteristics are related to when and if an SEP opens in a particular locality. Logistic regression models are used to explore how need, political factors, SEP diffusion from Tacoma (the first SEP), and metropolitan socioeconomic characteristics are related to SEP presence. Results indicate that need is not a significant predictor of having an SEP. Predictors were the percentage of the population who are men who have sex with men (AOR=6.95; 95% CI=1.29–37.49), and metropolitan area population (AOR=1.08 per 100,000; 95% CI=1.02–1.14). Predictors of having an SEP in a metropolitan area seem to be political factors and metropolitan area population size, not need among IDUs. Gay political influence and/or support may well facilitate SEP formation, and geographic diffusion may influence where SEPs are established.     

Syringe access,syringe sharing,and police encounters among people who inject drugs in New York City: A community-level perspective

BackgroundInjection drug user (IDU) experience and perceptions of police practices may alter syringe exchange program (SEP) use or influence risky behaviour. Previously, no community-level data had been collected to identify the prevalence or correlates of police encounters reported by IDUs in the United States.MethodsNew York City IDUs recruited through respondent-driven sampling were asked about past-year police encounters and risk behaviours, as part of the National HIV Behavioural Surveillance study. Data were analysed using multiple logistic regression.ResultsA majority (52%) of respondents (n = 514) reported being stopped by police officers; 10% reported syringe confiscation. In multivariate modelling, IDUs reporting police stops were less likely to use SEPs consistently (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40–0.89), and IDUs who had syringes confiscated may have been more likely to share syringes (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI = 0.90–3.44), though the finding did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionsFindings suggest that police encounters may influence consistent SEP use. The frequency of IDU-police encounters highlights the importance of including contextual and structural measures in infectious disease risk surveillance, and the need to develop approaches harmonizing structural policing and public health.     

Correlates of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Injection Drug Users in a Syringe-Exchange Program in Malmö, Sweden

Background: Injection drug users (IDUs) are at increased risk of various medical conditions, including bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). SSTIs, which are painful and can lead to life-threatening complications, are common but scarcely studied. Objectives: To investigate life time, past 12 month and past 30-day prevalence for SSTI related to injection drug use, in IDUs at Malmö syringe exchange program (Malmö SEP). To investigate factors associated with having ever had an SSTI. Methods: IDUs were recruited from Malmö SEP (N = 80). They participated in a survey with questions about demographics, drug use, and experience of SSTIs. Factors independently associated with self-reported SSTI ever were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Results: The lifetime reported prevalence of SSTI was 58%, past 12 months 30%, and past 30 days 14%. Factors independently associated with SSTI ever were age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.18), female sex (AOR = 6.75; 95% CI = 1.40–32.47), having ever injected prescribed drugs (AOR = 52.15; 95% CI = 5.17–525.67), and having ever injected in the neck (AOR = 8.08; 95% CI = 1.16–56.08). Conclusions/Importance: SSTI is common among IDUs in Malmö. Women and those injecting in the neck or injecting prescribed drugs (crushed tablets/liquids), are more likely to have had an SSTI.     

Syringe Exchange as a Social Movement: A Case Study of Harm Reduction in Oakland,California

The federal ban on funding for syringe exchange programs (SEPs) has greatly hampered attempts to prevent the spread of HIV among injection drug users in the United States. State laws prohibiting the possession and/or distribution of syringes have made SEPs illegal. These factors have lent a unique social movement quality to harm reduction efforts in the United States. Using a social movement perspective, this paper explores dynamics of the implementation and defense of the syringe exchange program in Oakland, California. The advantages and disadvantages of the social movement aspects of harm reduction are discussed.