Impact of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin implementation on emergency department length of stay,testing, admissions,and diagnoses

ObjectiveWhile high-sensitivity (hs) troponin (cTn) has been associated with shorter emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and decreased hospital admissions outside the United States (US), concerns have been raised that it will have opposite effects in the US. In this study, we aimed to compare ED LOS, admissions, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnoses before and after the implementation of hs-cTn.MethodsWe conducted a single-institution, retrospective study of two temporally matched six-month study periods before and after the implementation of hs-cTn. We included consecutive adults presenting with chest pain. The primary outcome was ED LOS, which was log transformed and analyzed using multiple linear regression. Binary secondary outcomes of admissions, cardiac testing, cardiology consultation, and ACS diagnoses were analyzed using multiple logistic regression.ResultsWe studied 1589 visits before and 1616 visits after implementation of hs-cTn. Median age and sex ratios were similar between study periods. Median ED LOS was longer in the post-implementation period [post: 384 (interquartile range, IQR 260–577) minutes; pre: 374 (IQR 250–564) minutes; adjusted geometric mean ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.01–1.10)]. Admissions were lower in the post-implementation period [post: 24% (385/1616) vs. pre: 28% (447/1589); adjusted odds ratio, aOR 0.75 (95% CI 0.64–0.88)]. Cardiac risk stratification testing [pre: 9% (142/1589) vs post: 9% (144/1616); aOR 0.95 (95% CI 0.74–1.22)], cardiology consultation [pre: 13% (208/1589) vs post: 13% (207/1616); aOR 0.91 (95% CI 0.73–1.12)], and ACS diagnoses [pre: 7% (116/1589) vs post: 7% (120/1616); aOR 0.94 (95% CI 0.72–1.24)] were similar between the two study periods.ConclusionIn this single-center study, transition to hs-cTn was associated with an increased ED LOS, decreased admissions, and no substantial change in cardiac risk stratification testing, cardiology consultation, or ACS diagnoses.     

Is it Appropriate for Patients to be Discharged at the Scene by Paramedics?

Background: Outcomes of patients who are discharged at the scene by paramedics are not fully understood. Objective: We aimed to describe the risk of re-presentation and/or death in prehospital patients discharged at the scene. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked ambulance, emergency department (ED), and death data. We compared outcomes in patients who were discharged at the scene by paramedics with those who were transported to ED by paramedics and then discharged from ED between January 1 and December 31, 2013 in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Occurrences of subsequent ambulance requests, ED attendance, hospital admission and death were compared between those discharged at the scene and those discharged from ED. Results: There were 47,330 patients during the study period, of whom 19,732 and 27,598 patients were discharged at the scene and from ED, respectively. Compared to those discharged from ED, those discharged at the scene were more likely to subsequently: request an ambulance (6.1% vs. 1.8%, adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0–3.9), attend ED (4.6% vs. 1.4%, adj OR 3.3; 95% CI 2.8–3.8), be admitted to hospital (3.3% vs. 0.8%, adj OR 4.2; 95% CI 3.4–5.1). Those discharged at the scene tended towards an increased likelihood of death (0.2% vs. 0.1%, adj OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.99–3.2) within 24 hours of discharge compared to those discharged from ED. Conclusion: Patients attended by paramedics who were discharged at the scene had more subsequent events than those who were transported to and discharged from ED. Further consideration needs to be given to who is suitable to be discharged at the scene by paramedics.     

T HE E PIDEMIOLOGY OF P AIN IN THE P REHOSPITAL S ETTING

Objective. To develop national estimates of the epidemiology of pain in the prehospital setting. Methods. Cross-sectional data on a probability sample of 21,103 emergency department (ED) visits from the 1999 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were analyzed. For patients arriving by ambulance, the frequencies (95% confidence intervals) of patients presenting with no level of pain reported (data unknown or missing) and those reporting no, mild, and moderate or severe pain were determined. The reasons for visit among those with moderate or severe pain, and the ED narcotic analgesic use among those with pain information reported and not reported, were also determined. >Results. Of the 102.8 million patients visiting the ED in 1999, 14.5 million arrived by ambulance. Fifty-three percent (49-58%) were female. Seven million six hundred thousand [52% (48-56%)] had no information on presenting level of pain reported, 2.0 million [14% (2-25%)] had no pain, 2.0 million [14% (3-25%)] had mild pain, and 2.9 million [20% (12-29%)] had moderate or severe pain. Among those with moderate or severe pain, the most common reasons for visit were injuries 27% (11-43%) and non-injury musculoskeletal symptoms 18% (0-39%). Narcotic analgesics were ordered or continued in 13% (0-29%) of those with no presenting level of pain recorded and 21% (9-34%) of those for whom the presenting level of pain was recorded. >Conclusion. Pain is a common condition among prehospital patients: 20% reported moderate to severe pain. Given the use of narcotic analgesics among those for whom pain information was not reported, this is likely a conservative estimate.     

P REDICTED U TILIZATION OF E MERGENCY M EDICAL S ERVICES T ELEMEDICINE IN D ECREASING A MBULANCE T RANSPORTS

Objective. To determine predicted utilization, decrease in ambulance transports, and target population for emergency medical services (EMS) if telemedicine capabilities were available to the medic units in the field. Methods. A retrospective chart review of 345 consecutive ambulance transports to four hospitals (Level I urban trauma center, urban tertiary care center, children's hospital, and suburban community hospital) was performed by a panel of three board-certified emergency medicine physicians experienced and credentialed in emergency telemedicine. They independently reviewed the emergency department (ED) and EMS records and were asked to determine whether patients required ambulance transport for evaluation or whether disposition could be made following paramedic and emergency physician assessment via telemedicine. A five-point Likert scale was used to grade feasibility of telemedicine disposition (definitely yes, probably yes, maybe, probably no, definitely no). Other variables analyzed included age, sex, race, chief complaint, phone, private medical doctor, and call location by patient zip code, call site, and receiving hospital. Results. In 14.7% of cases (6% definitely yes and 8.7% probably yes), disposition could be made without transport using telemedicine. The age range for eliminating transport was 2 weeks through 92 years, with mean age of 26.6 years. Under the age of 50 years, 46 out of 238 patients (19.3%) could have possibly been managed by telemedicine. Conclusion. Use of EMS telemedicine could result in an approximately 15% decrease in ambulance transports when it alone is added to the prehospital care provider's armamentarium. Emphasis for implementation should be placed on younger patients and an identified subset of chief complaints conducive to management using telemedicine.     

An intervention to encourage ambulance paramedics to bring patients' own medications to the ED: Impact on medications brought in and prescribing errors

Objective: To undertake and evaluate a multifaceted intervention to encourage paramedics to bring patients' own medications (POM) to the ED. Method: Adult patients were enrolled in each of the pre‐intervention (March 2006) and post‐intervention (December 2006) periods if they were brought to ED by ambulance, taking four or more medications, admitted to hospital and were not referred to a pharmacist prior to the admission medication chart being written. ED pharmacists determined patients' regular medication and details of medications brought in by ambulance. Medication charts were assessed for discrepancies related to medications taken prior to presentation. These were recorded as errors if a change was made to the medication chart after discussion with the prescriber. The intervention, conducted in October and November 2006, involved meetings with Metropolitan Ambulance Service * team managers and dissemination of promotional material. Paramedics of the Metropolitan Ambulance Service were participants for the intervention. Main outcome measures were: percentage of regular medications incorrectly prescribed; and percentage of POM brought to ED by paramedics. Results: One hundred patients were enrolled in each of the pre‐ and post‐intervention periods. The percentage of regular medications incorrectly prescribed significantly decreased from 18.9% (151/800, 95% CI 16–22%) to 8.8% (73/834, 95% CI 7–11%) in the pre‐ and post‐intervention periods, respectively (P < 0.001). Pre‐intervention, paramedics brought some or all POM to ED in 67.0% (67/100, 95% CI 57–76%) of cases compared with 87.0% (87/100, 95% CI 78–93%) of cases, post‐intervention. Conclusion: The multifaceted intervention encouraging paramedics to bring POM to ED was effective. POM were brought into ED more frequently and prescribing errors reduced.     

The Effect of Emergency Department Expansion on Emergency Department Overcrowding

Objectives: To examine the effects of emergency department (ED) expansion on ambulance diversion at an urban, academic Level 1 trauma center. Methods: This was a pre‐post study performed using administrative data from the ED and hospital electronic information systems. On April 19, 2005, the adult ED expanded from 28 to 53 licensed beds. Data from a five‐month pre‐expansion period (November 1, 2004, to March 1, 2005) and a five‐month postexpansion period (June 1, 2005, to October 31, 2005) were included for this analysis. ED and waiting room statistics as well as diversion status were obtained. Total ED length of stay (LOS) was defined as the time from patient registration to the time leaving the ED. Admission hold LOS was defined as the time from the inpatient bed request to the time leaving the ED for admitted patients. Mean differences (95% confidence interval [CI]) in total time spent on ambulance diversion per month, diversion episodes per month, and duration per diversion episode were calculated. An accelerated failure time model was performed to test if ED expansion was associated with a reduction in ambulance diversion while adjusting for potential confounders. Results: From pre‐expansion to postexpansion, daily patient volume increased but ED occupancy decreased. There was no significant change in the time spent on ambulance diversion per month (mean difference, 10.9 hours; 95% CI =?74.0 to 95.8), ambulance diversion episodes per month (two episodes per month; 95% CI =?4.2 to 8.2), and duration of ambulance diversion per episode (0.3 hours; 95% CI =?4.0 to 3.5). Mean (±SD) total LOS increased from 4.6 (±1.9) to 5.6 (±2.3) hours, and mean (±SD) admission hold LOS also increased from 3.0 (±0.2) to 4.1 (±0.2) hours. The proportion of patients who left without being seen was 3.5% and 2.7% (p = 0.06) in the pre‐expansion and postexpansion periods, respectively. In the accelerated failure time model, ED expansion did not affect the time to the next ambulance diversion episode. Conclusions: An increase in ED bed capacity did not affect ambulance diversion. Instead, total and admission hold LOS increased. As a result, ED expansion appears to be an insufficient solution to improve diversion without addressing other bottlenecks in the hospital.     

Hypoglycemia Emergencies: Factors Associated with Prehospital Care,Transportation Status,Emergency Department Disposition,and Cost

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate demographic/clinical characteristics and treatment/transportation decisions by emergency medical services (EMS) for patients with hypoglycemia and link EMS activations to patient disposition, outcomes, and costs to the emergency medical system. This evaluation was to identify potential areas where improvements in prehospital healthcare could be made. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) registry and three national surveys: Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2013, to examine care of hypoglycemia from the prehospital and the emergency department (ED) perspectives. Results: The study estimated 270,945 hypoglycemia EMS incidents from the NEMSIS registry. Treatments were consistent with national guidelines (i.e., oral glucose, intravenous [IV] dextrose, or glucagon), and patients were more likely to be transported to the ED if the incident was in a rural setting or they had other chief concerns related to the pulmonary or cardiovascular system. Use of IV dextrose decreased the likelihood of transportation. Approximately 43% of patients were not transported from the scene. Data from the NEDS survey estimated 258,831 ED admissions for hypoglycemia, and 41% arrived by ambulance. The median ambulance expenditure was $664?±?98. From the ED, 74% were released. The average ED charge that did not lead to hospital admission was $3106?±?86. Increased odds of overnight admission included infection and acute renal failure. Conclusions: EMS activations for hypoglycemia are sizeable and yet a considerable proportion of patients are not transported to or are discharged from the ED. Seemingly, these events resolved and were not medically complex. It is possible that implementation and appropriate use of EMS treat-and-release protocols along with utilizing programs to educate patients on hypoglycemia risk factors and emergency preparedness could partially reduce the burden of hypoglycemia to the healthcare system.     

P REHOSPITAL R APID-SEQUENCE I NTUBATION

Prehospital pain management has become an important emergency medical services (EMS) patient care issue. Objectives. To describe the frequency of EMS andemergency department (ED) analgesic administration to injured children; to describe factors associated with the administration of analgesia by EMS; andto assess whether children with lower-extremity fractures receive analgesia as frequently as do adults with similar injuries. Methods. This was a retrospective study of children (age < 21 years) who were transported by EMS between January 2000 andJune 2002 andhad a final hospital diagnosis of extremity fractures or burns. Secondarily, children with lower-extremity fractures were compared with a cohort of EMS-transported adults with similar injuries andtransported during the same study period. Receipt of andtime of parenteral analgesia were recorded. Results. Seventy-three children met the inclusion criteria. The mean (range) age of this sample was 12.4 (0.9–21) years, with only four patients aged < 5 years. A majority of the patients were male (49/73, 67.1%) andsustained femur (20/73, 27.4%) or tibia/fibula (26/73, 35.6%) fractures. Few pediatric patients received prehospital analgesia (16/73, 21.9%), while a majority received analgesia in the ED (58/73, 79.4%). Prehospital analgesia was associated with earlier patient treatment than that administered in the ED (22.3 ± 5.9 min vs. 88.3 ± 38.2 min). Comparing children (n = 33) with adults (n = 76) with similar lower-extremity fractures, a small insignificant difference was found in the rate of prehospital analgesia between children andadults (7/33, 21.2%, vs. 20/56, 26.3%). Conclusion. Few pediatric patients receive prehospital analgesia, although most ultimately received ED analgesia. Few factors were identified that could be associated with EMS oligoanalgesia. No difference was found between children andadults in the rates of EMS analgesia.     

Impact of a government triple zero awareness campaign on emergency department patient characteristics

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a government triple zero community awareness campaign on the characteristics of patients attending an ED. Methods: A study using Emergency Department Information System data was conducted in an adult metropolitan tertiary‐referral teaching hospital in Brisbane. The three outcomes measured in the 3 month post‐campaign period were arrival mode, Australasian Triage Scale and departure status. These measures reflect ambulance usage, clinical urgency and illness severity, respectively. They were compared with those in the 3 month pre‐campaign period. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the impacts of the campaign on each of the three outcome measures after controlling for age, sex, day and time of arrival, and daily minimum temperature. Results: There were 17 920 visits in the pre‐ and 17 793 visits in the post‐campaign period. After the campaign, fewer patients arrived at the ED by road ambulance (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–1.00), although the impact of the campaign on the arrival mode was only close to statistical significance (Wald χ²‐test, P= 0.055); and patients were significantly less likely to have higher clinical urgency (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79–0.94), while more likely to be admitted (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.38–2.05) or complete treatment in the ED (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23–1.73) instead of leaving without waiting to be seen. Conclusions: The campaign had no significant impact on the arrival mode of the patients. After the campaign, the illness acuity of the patients decreased, whereas the illness severity of the patients increased.     

The Effect of Picture Archiving and Communications Systems on the Accuracy of Diagnostic Interpretation of Pediatric Emergency Physicians

Objectives: To compare the accuracy of diagnostic interpretation of radiographs by pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) before and after the introduction of a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). Methods: The pre‐PACS study period included results from September 2001, when patients were evaluated by using only conventional radiographs. The post‐PACS study period consisted of results from September 2002, when patients were evaluated by using only digital radiographic studies. During these periods, consecutive medical records of all patients who underwent radiological studies when attending the pediatric emergency department (ED) were reviewed. The radiographic interpretation by the pediatric EP, documented at the time of the ED visit, was compared with that made by the pediatric radiologist. Results: Data were available from 1,644/1,651 sets of conventional radiographs ordered for the pre‐PACS study period and from 1,430/1,431 sets of digital radiographic studies for the post‐PACS study period. The prevalence of positive radiological studies as per the radiologists was 32.2% (pre‐PACS study period) vs. 28.7% (post‐PACS study period). Diagnostic performance of the pediatric EPs for the two time periods was as follows: overall accuracy, 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 94.5% to 100%) vs. 98.5% (95% CI = 87.5% to 100%); sensitivity, 96.4% (95% CI = 94.5% to 97.8%) vs. 98.1% (95% CI = 96.2% to 99.2%); specificity, 98.9% (95% CI = 98.1% to 99.4%) vs. 98.6% (95% CI = 97.7% to 99.3%); negative predictive value, 98.3% (95% CI = 97.4% to 99.0%) vs. 99.2% (95% CI = 98.5% to 99.7%); and positive predictive value, 97.7% (95% CI = 96.0% to 98.8%) vs. 96.6% (95% CI = 94.4% to 98.2%). The proportion of false negatives (FN) was 1.2% (19/1,644) vs. 0.6% (8/1,430). Only one FN patient for each time period required immediate follow‐up for a missed diagnosis. Conclusions: Radiograph interpretations by pediatric EPs with digital studies remain as accurate in comparison with assessments performed by using conventional radiographs.     

Use of Emergency Departments by Elder Patients: A Five -year Follow-up Study

Abstract. Objective: Tb compare the use of emergency medical care by elders in the United States in 1995 with that previously described for 1990. Methods: A computerized billing database of 88 EDs in 21 states was retrospectively reviewed for 1995, comparing elder and nonelder patients, estimating national use of emergency medical services by elders, and comparing the 1995 data with previously published results for 1990. Results: From 1990 to 1995, the number of ED visits in the United States increased from 92 million to 100 million. The number of visits made by patients aged 65 years or older increased from 13,639,400 (15%) to 15,666,300 (15.7%), but this increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.17). The admission rate for elder ED patients increased from 32% to 46% over the five-year interval (p < 0.01). This represents more than 7 million hospital admissions for elder patients in 1995. The rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission for elders decreased from 7% to 6% over the five-year interval (p = 0.56), compared with 1.3% for nonelder patients for both years. Thirty percent of elder ED patients arrived by ambulance in 1990, compared with 33% in 1995 (p = 0.02). Based on 1995 data, elders comprised 39% of patients arriving by ambulance [odds ratio (OR) 4.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.71 to 4.79], 43% of all admissions (OR 6.59, 95% CI = 6.54 to 6.64), and 47% of ICU admissions (OR 5.00, 95% CI = 4.91 to 5.09). The comparable ORs in 1990 were 4.4, 5.6, and 5.5, respectively. Conclusions: From 1990 to 1995, the overall number of ED visits increased. The rate of increase was somewhat greater for elder patients. The use of ambulance services also disproportionately grew among elder patients, as did the rate of hospital admission. The overall rate of ICU admission was stable, but actually fell modestly for elder patients. Of these changes, only the increase in the rate of hospital admission for elders reached statistical significance.     

Matching Capacity to Demand: A Regional Dashboard Reduces Ambulance Avoidance and Improves Accessibility of Receiving Hospitals

Objectives: Ambulance diversion is a dangerous repercussion of emergency department (ED) crowding and can reflect fragmentation and a lack of coordination in designating optimal patient offload sites for prehospital providers. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether proactive destination selection through the Regional Emergency Patient Access and Coordination (REPAC) program would enhance capacity and ED flow management. Methods: The REPAC system provides a dashboard that synthesizes real‐time capacity and acuity data for all three adult EDs in the city of Calgary, assigning a color code to reflect receiving status. It assigns destination for the next patient transported by emergency medical services (EMS) by categorizing ED sites as having either a favorable (green/yellow) status or unfavorable (orange/red) status. Three time windows were analyzed: a 6‐month window prior to REPAC implementation (pre), the first 6‐month window immediately following (post1), and the second 6‐month period following (post2). Primary outcomes of interest were the proportion of time spent in favorable versus unfavorable status and EMS avoidances for all adult ED sites in the region (percentage of total time with any center on EMS bypass). Information on total number of ED visits, percentage of patients arriving by EMS transports, admission rates, patient acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Score), age, and length of stay (LOS) for admitted and discharged patients was collected. The Kruskal‐Wallis test was employed for primary outcome analysis. Results: Implementation of the REPAC system resulted in an increase in the proportion of total time region hospitals reported favorable status (57.5% vs. 64.1%) pre versus post1, an effect that was accentuated at 1 year (post2, 78.7%; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). There was a concomitant decrease in EMS avoidances as a result of the REPAC system, 4.4% to 1.8% (pre vs. post1), also further improved at 1 year to 0.6% (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Conclusions: Proactive EMS destination selection through a real‐time integrated electronic surveillance system enhances regional capacity and flow management while significantly reducing ambulance diversions. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1383–1389 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine     

P ATIENT S TATUS AND T IME TO I NTUBATION IN THE A SSESSMENT OF P REHOSPITAL I NTUBATION P ERFORMANCE

Assessment of paramedic endotracheal intubation (ETI) performance often does not account for varied clinical conditions or the time required to complete the procedure. Objective. To demonstrate the utility of patient status and time to intubation (TTI) for evaluating prehospital ETI performance. Methods. Paramedic charts were reviewed for the period January-December 1998. Patient clinical status was defined as cardiac arrest (absence of perfusing rhythm) or non-cardiac arrest (presence of perfusing rhythm). Method, route, and success of ETI were noted. The TTI was determined as the elapsed time from on-scene arrival to securing of the endotracheal tube. Time elapsed from on-scene arrival to emergency department arrival was noted for instances of failed ETI. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimator). Results. Computer records were available for 26,026 patient contacts. Of 893 documented ETI attempts, 771 (86%) were successful. The ETI success rate was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for cardiac arrests (551 of 591, 93.2%) than for non-cardiac arrests (220 of 302, 72.9%). Median TTIs were 5 minutes (95% CI: 5, 5) for cardiac arrests and 17 minutes (95% CI: 14, 20) for non-cardiac arrests; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). For non-cardiac arrests, ETI success was significantly (p = 0.002) higher for orotracheal intubation (OTI) (168 of 214, 78.5%) than for nasotracheal intubation (NTI) (52 of 88, 59.1%). Median TTIs were 15 minutes (95% CI: 13, 17) for OTI and 25 minutes (95% CI: 23, 27) for NTI; this difference was significant (p = 0.002). For non-cardiac arrests, the difference in ETI success rates between conventional ETI (63 of 88, 71.6%) and midazolam-facilitated ETI (157 of 214, 73.4%) was not significant (p = 0.75). Median TTIs were 16 minutes (95% CI: 13, 19) for conventional ETI and 19 minutes (95% CI: 16, 22) for the midazolam-facilitated ETI; this difference was not significant (p = 0.08). Conclusions. The TTI is shorter and ETI success rates are higher for patients in cardiac arrest. Similar trends are observed for OTI compared with NTI in non-cardiac arrest patients. Success rates and TTIs for conventional vs midazolam-facilitated intubation in non-cardiac arrest patients do not differ. Prehospital ETI data should be segregated according to patient clinical status. Survival analysis of TTI can be used to establish time benchmarks for performing field intubation and to define strategies for approaching field intubation.     

A Prospective Before and After Study of Droperidol for Prehospital Acute Behavioral Disturbance

Study Objective: Acute behavioral disturbance is a common problem for emergency medical services. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of droperidol compared to midazolam in the prehospital setting. Methods: This was a prospective before and after study comparing droperidol to midazolam for prehospital acute behavioral disturbance, when the state ambulance service changed medications. The primary outcome was the proportion of adverse effects (airway intervention, oxygen saturation < 90%, respiratory rate < 12, systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, sedation assessment tool score ?3 and dystonic reactions) in patients receiving sedation. Secondary outcomes included time to sedation, requirement for additional sedation, staff and patient injuries, and prehospital time. Results: There were 141 patients administered midazolam and 149 patients administered droperidol in the study. Alcohol was the most common cause of acute behavioral disturbance. Fewer patient adverse events occurred with droperidol (11/149) compared to midazolam (33/141) (7% vs. 23%; absolute difference 16%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8% to 24%; p = 0.0001). Median time to sedation was 22 min (interquartile range [IQR]:18 to 35 min) for droperidol compared to 30 min (IQR:20 to 45 min) for midazolam. Additional prehospital sedation was required in 6/149 (4%) droperidol patients and 20/141 (14%) midazolam patients, and 11 (7%) droperidol and 59 (42%) midazolam patients required further sedation in the emergency department. There were no differences in patient or staff injuries, or prehospital time. Conclusions: The use of droperidol for acute behavioral disturbance in the prehospital setting is associated with fewer adverse events, a shorter time to sedation, and fewer requirements for additional sedation.     

P REHOSPITAL S EDATION WITH I NTRAMUSCULAR D ROPERIDOL : A O NE - YEAR P ILOT

Objective. Combative patients pose a threat to themselves and prehospital personnel, and are at risk for sudden death. Droperidol is an antipsychotic and sedative agent that might be effectively utilized by paramedics to assist in the management of uncontrollably violent patients. Methods. A prospective observational study of patients requiring sedation was conducted in an urban third-service emergency medical services system (55,000 calls per year). Patients were scored by paramedics on a five-point agitation scale with 5 being extremely combative (continuous, vigorous fighting against restraints) and 1 being somnolent (sleeping or sleepy). Eligible (score 4–5) patients received 5?mg of intramuscular droperidol on direct physician order. Data including vital signs and agitation scores were recorded at 5-minute intervals until hospital arrival. Adverse effects were also recorded. Results. Fifty-three patients received droperidol (51 patients received 5?mg; two received 2.5?mg) during the study period. The average predrug agitation score was 4.7 (±0.1 SD). The average 5-minute postdrug score was 3.9 (±0.1 SD, 95% CI 3.7–4.1). The average 10-minute postdrug score was 3.3 (±0.1 SD, 95% CI 3.1–3.6). The average hospital arrival score was 2.8 (±0.1 SD, 95% CI 2.5–3.1). One patient became obtunded and required supplemental oxygen; no other patient experienced an adverse event after receiving droperidol. Sedation was ineffective in seven patients, three of whom had head injuries, and one of whom received 2.5?mg of droperidol per physician order. Paramedics sustained no needlestick exposures. Conclusion. Intramuscular droperidol contributed to effective and rapid prehospital sedation in this observational series of 53 combative patients.     

Access block causes emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion in Perth, Western Australia

Objective: Access block refers to the situation where patients in the emergency department (ED) requiring inpatient care are unable to gain access to appropriate hospital beds within a reasonable time frame. We systematically evaluated the relationship between access block, ED overcrowding, ambulance diversion, and ED activity.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Emergency Department Information System for the three major central metropolitan EDs in Perth, Western Australia, for the calendar years 2001–2. Bivariate analyses were performed in order to study the relationship between a range of emergency department workload variables, including access block (>8 hour total ED stay for admitted patients), ambulance diversion, ED overcrowding, and ED waiting times.

Results: We studied 259 580 ED attendances. Total diversion hours increased 74% from 3.39 hours/day in 2001 to 5.90 hours/day in 2002. ED overcrowding (r = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 0.98), ambulance diversion (r = 0.75; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.88), and ED waiting times for care (r = 0.83; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93) were strongly correlated with high levels of ED occupancy by access blocked patients. Total attendances, admissions, discharges, and low acuity patient attendances were not associated with ambulance diversion.

Conclusion: Reducing access block should be the highest priority in allocating resources to reduce ED overcrowding. This would result in reduced overcrowding, reduced ambulance diversion, and improved ED waiting times. Improving hospital inpatient flow, which would directly reduce access block, is most likely to achieve this.

     

Predictors of demand for emergency prehospital care: an Australian study

INTRODUCTION: Determining the predictors of demand for emergency prehospital care can assist ambulance services in undertaking policy and planning activities. HYPOTHESIS: Demand for prehospital care can be explained by demographic, health status, and economic determinants. METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional design to investigate the association of demographic, health status, and insurance factors with the use of prehospital, ambulance care. Core data items including age, gender, marital status, country of origin, triage score, diagnosis, time of presentation, method of arrival, and patient disposition were collected for every patient who presented at the Emergency Department of the study hospital over a four-month period. Ambulance usage was analysed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: For the 10,229 patients surveyed, only a small number were triaged as having the highest level of urgent medical need (0.8%), but the majority of these used prehospital emergency medical care (90.2%). Predictors of ambulance use included age > 65 years (Prevalence Ratio [PR] = 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-3.63), being married or in a de-facto relationship (PR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.60-0.79) or divorced, separated, or widowed (PR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70-0.98), triage score level 1 or 2 (PR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.68-2.28), or triage score level 3 (PR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.38-1.72), diagnosis involving either mental (PR = 4.29; 95% CI: 1.84-10.01), nervous (PR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.19-6.31) or trauma (PR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.03-5.27) conditions, and insurance status (PR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.40-1.71). Ethnicity, gender, and time of day were not associated with usage. CONCLUSION: Demand for ambulance services can be predicted by a number of demographic, medical status, and insurance variables. Age and triage levels are key influences on demand for ambulance services. Ambulance insurance status provides an economic incentive to use ambulance services regardless of the urgency of the medical condition.     

Clinical and Economic Factors Associated with Ambulance Use to the Emergency Department

Background: Concern about ambulance diversion and emergency department (ED) overcrowding has increased scrutiny of ambulance use. Knowledge is limited, however, about clinical and economic factors associated with ambulance use compared to other arrival methods. Objectives: To compare clinical and economic factors associated with different arrival methods at a large, urban, academic hospital ED. Methods: This was a retrospective, cross‐sectional study of all patients seen during 2001 (N= 80,209) at an urban academic hospital ED. Data were obtained from hospital clinical and financial records. Outcomes included acuity and severity level, primary complaint, medical diagnosis, disposition, payment, length of stay, costs, and mode of arrival (bus, car, air‐medical transport, walk‐in, or ambulance). Multivariate logistic regression identified independent factors associated with ambulance use. Results: In multivariate analysis, factors associated with ambulance use included: triage acuity A (resuscitation) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 51.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 33.1 to 79.6) or B (emergent) (OR, 9.2; 95% CI = 6.1 to 13.7), Diagnosis Related Group severity level 4 (most severe) (OR, 1.4; 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.8), died (OR, 3.8; 95% CI = 1.5 to 9.0), hospital intensive care unit/operating room admission (OR, 1.9; 95% CI = 1.6 to 2.1), motor vehicle crash (OR, 7.1; 95% CI = 6.4 to 7.9), gunshot/stab wound (OR, 2.1; 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.8), fell 0–10 ft (OR, 2.0; 95% CI = 1.8 to 2.3). Medicaid Traditional (OR, 2.0; 95% CI = 1.4 to 2.4), Medicare Traditional (OR, 1.8; 95% CI = 1.7 to 2.1), arrived weekday midnight–8 AM (OR, 2.0; 95% CI = 1.8 to 2.1), and age ≥65 years (OR, 1.3; 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.5). Conclusions: Ambulance use was related to severity of injury or illness, age, arrival time, and payer status. Patients arriving by ambulance were more likely to be acutely sick and severely injured and had longer ED length of stay and higher average costs, but they were less likely to have private managed care or to leave the ED against medical advice, compared to patients arriving by independent means.