A market survey of contact lens practice in Hong Kong

Purpose : The aim of this survey was to evaluate the use of contact lenses, current prescribing habits of practitioners and the development of the contact lens market in Hong Kong. Methods : Questionnaires were sent to all registered contact lens practitioners in Hong Kong. This questionnaire sought information about their choices on prescribing contact lenses and lens care products and their opinions on continuing education and future trends of contact lens development. Results : A total of 286 responses (22 per cent) were returned. On average, the respondents reported that 36 per cent of their patients were contact lens wearers and most were myopes. The ratio of new fittings to refittings was 1:3. Of the contact lens wearers, 66 per cent were fitted with planned replacement lenses, mostly daily disposable lenses. Multipurpose solution was the most popular lens care regimen prescribed. Only 48 per cent of astigmatic patients were fitted with toric lenses and the use of overnight orthokeratology and silicone hydrogel lenses was limited. Single vision contact lenses with over‐spectacles and monovision contact lenses were the most popular management for presbyopes. Dryness was the major problem reported by contact lens wearers. Practitioners look forward to further development of custom‐made toric, multifocal and silicone hydrogel lenses. The major source of new contact lens information was communication with contact lens suppliers. Conclusion : Compared to previous reports, there was no significant change in the prescribing habits of practitioners. The major complaint of contact lens wearers is still ocular dryness. The contact lens market is driven by younger contact lens wearers, and planned replacement soft contact lenses together with multipurpose solutions dominate. The use of bifocal/multifocal lenses remained low and practitioners want low cost bifocal/multifocal contact lenses with better visual performance and toric lenses with a wider range in parameters. The use of overnight wear lenses such as silicone hydrogel and ortho‐k lenses is limited and 30 days continuous wear silicone hydrogel lenses are prescribed mainly for daily wear.     

Impact of contact lens material and design on the ocular surface

Background

To evaluate the impact on the ocular surface of a daily disposable hydrogel contact lens with high water content compared with two silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses of lower water content.

Methods

The hydrogel lens assessed was made from nesofilcon A and the silicone hydrogel lenses were made of delefilcon A and stenfilcon A. Contact lens thickness was measured to assess material stability during daily wear, and ocular surface parameters such as tear film osmolarity, tear meniscus area and central corneal thickness were also assessed. Optical quality was analysed for all cases by means of wavefront aberrometry.

Results

The nesofilcon A was shown to be the thinnest lens (p < 0.001), while no differences in lens thickness were found between the two silicone hydrogel lenses (p = 0.495). No significant differences were found in tear film osmolarity, tear meniscus area, central corneal thickness or corneal aberrations, either as a function of the lens measured or time of use (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In spite of having the thinnest lens and the highest water content, the hydrogel does not significantly impact on tear film and corneal swelling after one day of use in first‐time wearers.

     

An evaluation of silicone‐hydrogel lenses worn on a daily wear basis

Purpose: To examine the clinical performance of two brands of silicone‐hydrogel lenses when worn on a daily wear basis. Methods: Fifty‐six subjects with no ocular disease were enrolled at multiple sites in Australasia. Contact lenses made from galyfilcon A or lotrafilcon A were randomly assigned to each eye of the subject and the lenses were worn on a daily wear basis for a period of two weeks. Subjects did not know the identity of the lenses they wore. Clinical data and patient responses to a questionnaire were gathered at an initial visit and after two weeks of wear. Results: For both lenses, the degree of limbal hyperaemia and bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia decreased significantly over the two‐week wearing period. The eyes wearing galyfilcon A lenses showed an increase in conjunctival staining compared to the baseline measures. On average, galyfilcon A lenses decentred more and moved less than the lotrafilcon A lenses. The lotrafilcon A lenses showed a greater loss of wettability, as judged by practitioner grading, than the galyfilcon A lenses over the two‐week period. The subjective responses showed strong preference for the galyfilcon A lens across 26 of 27 questions relating to comfort, vision, handling, preference and other subjective outcomes. Discussion: The results show that different silicone‐hydrogel lenses have different performance characteristics on the eye, when worn on a daily wear basis. Striving for high oxygen transmissibility at the expense of other properties may lead to a range of undesirable performance characteristics.     

Comparative clinical performance of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses for continuous wear

Background Silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses are now available for use on a 3O‐day continuous wear basis. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of two such lenses. Methods: In a single‐centre, randomised, subject‐masked, two‐period crossover study, 30 subjects wore a pair of Purevision lenses (Bausch & Lomb) and a pair of Focus Night & Day lenses (CIBA Vision), alternately, for successive eight‐week periods. Assessment was made of lens fit and surface characteristics, logh4AR visual acuity, ocular response and subjective reaction. Results: Lens fit, deposition and post‐lens debris were similar for the two lens types. High contrast visual acuity was statistically significantly better for the Purevision lens, as was the subject‐reported quality of vision, although these differences were not considered clinically significant. For both lenses, limbal and conjunctival redness reduced throughout the duration of the study, whereas there was a slight increase in the overall amount of corneal staining. The incidence of mucin balls peaked four weeks after commencing lens wear and began to decline thereafter; more mucin balls were noticed in subjects wearing Focus Night & Day lenses. No differences between the lenses were observed for any other biomicroscopic signs. Conclusions: This study demonstrates similar clinical performance with the two silicone hydrogel lenses evaluated. We believe that, with careful monitoring, both of these newgeneration lenses can be prescribed for continuous wear.     

Changes in myopia with low-Dk hydrogel and high-Dk silicone hydrogel extended wear.

PURPOSE: This study compared changes in myopia between wearers of high-oxygen permeability (Dk) silicone hydrogel lenses and low-Dk hydrogel lenses after 1 year of extended wear (EW). METHODS: Ninety-two adult subjects were randomly assigned to a lens type. Subjective refraction and autokeratometry were performed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: After 6 months of EW, myopia (spherical equivalent) regressed by 0.18 +/- 0.33 D (p < 0.001) in the high-Dk silicone hydrogel group and progressed by -0.23 +/- 0.36 D (p < 0.001) in the low-Dk hydrogel group. There were no further changes after 12 months. Previous lens wear history, baseline refractive error, and age and gender did not have an impact on the change in myopia, and only 35% of the variation could be accounted for by changes in corneal curvature and lens type. CONCLUSION: Soft contact lens type significantly affects the direction of change in myopia during EW. We hypothesize that these changes are driven by pressure-related redistribution of corneal tissue in high-Dk silicone hydrogel lens wearers and by hypoxia-associated corneal thinning in low-Dk hydrogel wearers. More long-term studies are required to confirm whether the effects of high-Dk silicone hydrogel lens wear on myopia are permanent.     

硅水凝胶镜片作为绷带型角膜接触镜的应用前景

角膜接触镜除了能够矫正屈光不正外,还能够作为绷带型角膜接触镜（绷带镜片）用于眼表疾病的治疗,大多数绷带镜片需要连续过夜配戴以实现良好的治疗效果,而传统的水凝胶镜片由于透氧性能的不足可能导致角膜缺氧,因此有高透氧性能的硅水凝胶镜片是更为理想的绷带镜片选择。了解硅水凝胶镜片作为绷带镜片在角膜病变、角膜屈光手术后以及作为药物载体的应用情况,将有助于制定绷带镜片治疗措施的个性化方案。     

Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface

For 30 years, contact lens research focused on the need for highly oxygen-permeable (Dk) soft lens materials. High Dk silicone hydrogel contact lenses, made available in 1999, met this need. The purpose of this review is to examine how silicone hydrogel lens wear affects the ocular surfaces and to highlight areas in which further research is needed to improve biocompatibility. Silicone hydrogel lenses have eliminated lens-induced hypoxia for the majority of wearers and have a less pronounced effect on corneal homeostasis compared to other lens types; however, mechanical interaction with ocular tissue and the effects on tear film structure and physiology are similar to that found with soft lens wear in general. Although the ocular health benefits of silicone hydrogel lenses have increased the length of time lenses can be worn overnight, the risk of infection is similar to that found with other soft lens types, and overnight wear remains a higher risk factor for infection than daily wear, regardless of lens material. Future contact lens research will focus on gaining a better understanding of the way in which contact lenses interact with the corneal surface, upper eyelid, and the tear film, and the lens-related factors contributing to infection and inflammatory responses.     

Clinic study on silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage contact lenses after LASEK surgery

AIM: To compare the clinical performance of two types of silicon hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage lenses after LASEK surgery. METHODS: A prospective, double-masked study was conducted on 42 eyes of 21 patients who received binocular LASEK surgeries. The interocular difference in spherical equivalent power was less than -1.50D. Patients were randomly assigned to wear Galyfilcon A (Lens A) bandage contact lens in one eye and Balafilcon A (Lens B) in the fellow eye after the surgery. The responses to a subjective questionnaire on comfort of wearing, corneal epithelial status, conjunctival hyperemia, limbal neovascularization, lens fitting and contact lens debris were assessed 1 and 5 days postoperatively. Corneal endothelium was assessed before and 5 days after the surgery upon bandage lens removal. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of conjunctival hyperemia, limbal neovascularization, contact lens fitting, corneal epithelial status, corneal endothelium cell density (CD) and endothelium cell size (CS) at any postoperative visit. Complaints of discomfort, including foreign body sensation, pain and intolerance were statistically more among Lens B wearers at any postoperative visit (P<0.05). Lens B appeared to attract much more debris than Lens A at the 5-day post-operative follow-up visit (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The two types of silicon hydrogel lenses investigated in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in terms of corneal responses and lens fitting. However, Lens A showed a better performance in terms of comfort of wearing and deposit resistance.     

A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses

PURPOSE: To compare, in routine optometric practice, the outcome of keeping successful soft contact lens (SCL) wearers in their lenses to re-fitting them with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel (SiH) lenses. METHODS: Forty-nine successful daily disposable lens wearers were recruited; 19 continued to wear daily SCLs and 30 were refitted with high-Dk SiH lenses on a 30-day/night schedule. Patients were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months by slit lamp examination along with the Efron grading scales, and central corneal thickness (CCT) and the corneal endothelium were assessed by non-contact specular microscopy. RESULTS: No substantial changes in subjective vision, refraction, visual acuity or overall lens comfort occurred for those completing the study, although five SiH lens wearers did discontinue due to reduced comfort, eyelid problems or seasonal allergy. Contact lens induced peripheral ulcers (CLPU) were observed in three patients in the first 3 months in the SiH lens group and these were also discontinued. Over the 6 month period, a complete set of records was obtained for 16 in each group. For those completing the study, lens dryness scores were variable, but there was a slight improvement in favour of SiH lenses. Small, but statistically significant, reductions in corneal staining, bulbar hyperaemia, and limbal neovascularisation in favour of the SiH lenses were also evident but mainly because of further increases in the daily lens wearers. Contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) and corneal endothelial polymegethism were mild to moderate and showed slight increases in the daily lens wearers at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The present studies confirm that the continuous wear of SiH lenses for up to 30 days can be considered as an alternative to daily disposable soft lens wear, but is not suitable for everyone.     

Mucin balls with wear of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare the frequency of mucin balls in subjects wearing conventional and high-Dk silicone hydrogel lenses during 12 months of extended-wear and to determine whether mucin balls are associated with any lens or subject characteristics. METHODS: This study used data from a clinical trial where subjects wore either conventional hydrogel (N = 69, 6-night extended-wear) or silicone hydrogel (N = 70, 30-night extended-wear) contact lenses for 12 months. The number of mucin balls and other physiological responses, lens fit and performance, and subjective patient responses to lens wear were rated at each scheduled visit. RESULTS: Subjects in the silicone hydrogel group had significantly greater numbers of mucin balls compared with subjects in the conventional hydrogel group over time (p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in the percentage of subjects with mucin balls between the two groups. Increasing lens wettability, back surface deposits, and time of lens wear were associated with higher numbers of mucin balls in the conventional hydrogel group (p < 0.05); steeper corneal curvature and increasing lens wettability, back surface deposits, and number of microcysts were associated with higher numbers of mucin balls in the silicone hydrogel group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a subset of the population is predisposed to develop mucin balls irrespective of the soft contact lens type worn, but lens type influences the degree of mucin ball formation. The relationship between lens wettability, back surface deposits, and steeper corneal curvature with mucin balls supports the hypothesis that the mechanical interaction of a lens with the surface layer of the epithelium and the tear film in association with the blinking forces of the lid is involved in mucin ball formation.     

The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene-biguanide (PHMB)- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses. METHODS: This study was a randomised, controlled and investigator-masked (to the lens regimen) clinical study where the clinical performance of two multipurpose contact lens solutions was compared at a single site. Forty-one existing contact lens wearers were recruited and fitted randomly with either galyfilcon A or lotrafilcon A contact lenses. Subjects wore the same lens type for a period of 2 months but used a different care regime (PHMB- and polyquad-based) in a crossover manner, each for a period of 1 month. The primary outcome measure was the difference in corneal staining. Corneal staining was graded in five different locations: central, superior, inferior, temporal and nasal. Measurements of conjunctival redness, limbal redness, conjunctival staining and papillary conjunctivitis were also carried out throughout the study. Biomicroscopic measures were graded using the Efron grading scales. A variety of symptoms were also measured using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in overall corneal staining between lens types (p = 0.16) or care regimens (p = 0.60). Central corneal staining was significantly greater for the polyquad-based care regimen when compared with the PHMB-based care regimen (p = 0.04). Lotrafilcon A lenses showed greater superior corneal staining (p = 0.0004) and papillary conjunctivitis (p = 0.02), and lower comfort on insertion (p = 0.03) when compared with galyfilcon A lenses regardless of the care regime used. There were no statistically significant differences in the other biomicrosopic signs and symptoms between the lens types and the care regimes. CONCLUSIONS: Both care regimes performed in a similar clinical manner and are valid for use with the two silicone hydrogel contact lenses used in this study.     

Silicone hydrogel mini‐scleral contact lenses in early stage after corneal collagen cross‐linking for keratoconus: a retrospective case series

Background : The aim was to the evaluate performance of a novel silicone hydrogel mini‐scleral contact lens (SHmS) for optical correction of keratoconus in the early stages after the corneal collagen cross‐linking procedure (CXL). Methods : We retrospectively analysed the visual acuity improvement and corneal adaptation in the first 10 eyes of nine patients fitted with SHmS lenses one to 3.5 months after corneal collagen cross‐linking. The lenses were designed to rest over the patients’ sclera and peri‐limbal cornea and vault the central cornea with minimal support over it. Visual acuities with manifest refraction and contact lenses, refractive and topographical values (Kmin and Kmax) were evaluated on lens dispensing and after six month of lens wearing. Ocular physiological responses were evaluated using the Institute of Eye Research (IER) grading scales. Results : SHmS fitting was performed 2.1 ± 0.97 (SD) months after collagen cross‐linking. Mean follow up was 10.9 ± 4.41 months (range six to 18 months). Mean decimal visual acuity with SHmS was 0.66 ± 0.22 (approximately 6/9 Snellen fraction, range 0.3 to 0.1) or 0.75 ± 0.14 (approximately 6/8.1, range 0.5 to 1.0), when omitting two amblyopic eyes. Nine (90 per cent) eyes were successfully fitted, that is, able to wear the lenses for 10 hours per day or longer. Mean wearing time was 11.7 hours (range six to 14) per day. No corneal neovascularisation or papillary reaction was found in all fitted eyes. Conclusions : SHmS contact lenses provide successful visual rehabilitation shortly after corneal collagen cross‐linking. This new soft contact lens design with scleral fixation and minimal apical touch was demonstrated to be safe shortly after collagen cross‐linking, as the avoidance of contact with the treated zone minimises contact lens influence on corneal recovery.     

Mechanisms of dryness in soft lens wear— role of BUT and deposits

Background: The symptom of dryness in hydrogel lens wear is common but its origins remain poorly understood. To assess the theory that anterior lens surface interactions are responsible for the sensation of dryness during lens wear, 50 contact lens wearers were evaluated. Method: The Efron comfort scale was used to divide the group into subjects with comfortable lenses (26 control subjects) and those who were symptomatic (24 study subjects). The two groups were matched for gender, age, lens age, lens water content, lens wear experience and wearing environment. The only difference between the groups was that the non-symptomatic wearers had a greater wearing time (ANOVA, p = 0.005). Lens deposits and pre-lens tear thinning time (PLTTT) were assessed for each group. Results: The median PLTTT for the control group was three seconds (25th percentile, two seconds; 75th percentile five seconds); the study group had a median PLTTT of 3.5 seconds (25th percentile, 1.5 seconds; 75th percentile, four seconds). There was no significant difference in lens deposits and PLTTT between the comfortable and uncomfortable lens wearing groups, in particular, subjects with a short PLTTT (for example, less than four seconds) could still be comfortable. However, there was a significant inverse correlation between the grade of lens deposits and PLTTT (Spearman rank correlation, p = 0.01); a positive correlation between the grade of lens deposits and lens age (Spearman rank correlation, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The findings suggest that pre-lens tear stability is not necessarily an influence on comfort. It may be that the source of soft lens discomfort arises more from the exposed bulbar conjunctiva than the interaction between anterior lens surface and the tarsal conjunctiva. (Clin Exp Optom 1995; 78: 5: 168–175)     

Comparison of efficacy of two different silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after T-PRK

AIM:To compare the efficacy between two different silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy(T-PRK).METHODS:In this randomized controlled trial,a total of 89 patients(178 eyes) who underwent T-PRK at the Qingdao Eye Hospital from October to December 2019 were selected.One random eye wore a Senofilcon A bandage contact lens after surgery,and the other eye a Balafilcon A bandage contact lens.Pain scores,uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA),spherical equivalent(SE),corneal epithelial healing status,epithelial thickness,bandage lenses deposits,lenses movement,and ocular surface conditions were measured and compared.RESULTS:There were no differences between the two groups in UCVA,SE,corneal epithelial healing status,corneal epithelial thickness,tear river heights and tear film rupture time at each follow-up visit.However,postoperative pain scores in the Senofilcon A group were significantly lower than those of the Balafilcon A group(F_intergroups=67.833,P<0.001;F_time=383.773,P<0.001;F_interaction=57.344,P<0.001).The duration of pain in eyes in the Senofilcon A group was shorter than that of the Balafilcon A group(t=-3.326,P=0.001).The surface deposition scores and movement scores of Senofilcon A bandage lenses on the first and fourth days after surgery were lower than those of Balafilcon A bandage lenses(Z=-5.385,-6.782,P<0.001;Z=-8.336,-8.906,P<0.001).CONCLUSION:Both Senofilcon A and Balafilcon A bandage lenses have good efficacy after T-PRK.Senofilcon A lenses are associated with less pain and more comfort compared to Balafilcon A.     

Comparison of effectiveness of silicone hydrogel contact lens and hydrogel contact lens in patients after LASEK

AIM: To conduct a comparative study of effectiveness of silicone hydrogel contact lens and hydrogel contact lens, which are used in patients after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: Sixty-three patients (121 eyes) with a spherical equivalent ≤-5.0 D were chosen after undergoing LASEK in 2012 at Guangdong General Hospital. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. The silicone hydrogel group included 32 cases (61 eyes) that wore silicone hydrogel contact lenses for 4-6d after the operation, while the hydrogel group included 31 cases (60 eyes) who wore hydrogel contact lenses for 4-6d after the operation. Patients’ self-reported postoperative symptoms (including pain, photophobia, tears, and foreign body sensation) were evaluated. The healing time of the corneal epithelium, the visual acuity of patients without contact lens after epithelial healing, and the incidence of delayed corneal epithelial shedding were also assessed. The follow-up time was 1mo. RESULTS: Postoperative symptoms were milder in the silicone hydrogel group than in the hydrogel group. There were significant differences in pain, foreign body sensation, and photophobia between the 2 groups (P<0.05), although there was no significant difference in postoperative tearing (P>0.05). The healing time of the corneal epithelium in the silicone hydrogel lens group was markedly shorter than that in the hydrogel group (4.07±0.25 vs 4.33±0.82d, t=2.43, P=0.02). Visual acuity without contact lenses after healing of the corneal epithelium was better in the silicone hydrogel group compared with the hydrogel group (χ2=7.76, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of delayed corneal epithelial shedding between the 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with LASEK using silicon hydrogel contact lenses had less discomfort and shorter corneal epithelial healing time compared with those using hydrogel contact lenses, suggesting that silicon hydrogel contact lenses may be considered to be a better choice of bandage contact lens after LASEK.     

Glare and halo with refractive correction

Background: The aim of this investigation was to compare glare and halo with various methods of refractive correction. Methods: Ninety‐eight eyes of healthy pre‐presbyopes were analysed for the presence of glare and halo using computer‐generated stimuli. Subjects were divided into three groups: emmetropes without correction, single vision plastic lens spectacle wearers (with clean and dirty lenses) or single‐vision soft contact lens wearers. Results: No significant difference in glare was found among groups. Significant differences were noted in halos between emmetropes and both contact lens (p < 0.001) and uncleaned spectacle groups (p < 0.05) but not with cleaned spectacles. The reduction in halo size after cleaning the lenses was significant (p < 0.0187). Conclusions: Contact lens and unclean spectacle wearers both have significantly larger halos than emmetropes and those wearing cleaned spectacle lenses. Unclean spectacles may affect the accuracy of results in psychophysical and clinical testing.     

Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology experienced by neophyte silicone hydrogel (SiH) contact lens wearers in a daily-wear compared with a continuous-wear modality and with the different commercially available lenses over an 18-month period. METHODS: Forty-five neophyte subjects were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to wear one of two SiH materials: lotrafilcon A or balafilcon A lenses on either a daily- (LDW; BDW) or continuous-wear (LCW; BCW) basis. Additionally, a group of noncontact lens-wearing subjects (control group) was also recruited and followed over the same study period. Objective and subjective grading of ocular physiology were carried out together with tear meniscus height (TMH) and noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT). Subjects also subjectively rated symptoms and judgments with lens wear. After initial screening, subsequent measurements were taken after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS: Subjective and objective grading of ocular physiology revealed a small increase in bulbar, limbal, and palpebral hyperemia as well as corneal staining over time with both lens materials and regimes of wear (p < 0.05). No significant changes in NITBUT or TMH were found (p > 0.05). Subjective symptoms and judgment were not material- or modality-specific. CONCLUSIONS: Daily and continuous wear of SiH contact lenses induced small but statistically significant changes in ocular physiology and symptomatology. Clinical measures of tear film characteristics were unaffected by lens wear. Both materials and regimes of wear showed similar clinical performance. Long-term SiH contact lens wear is shown to be a successful option for patients.     

Refractive and biometric changes with silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

PURPOSE: This study reports data from an 18-month longitudinal study of neophyte contact lens wearers and compares changes in ocular refraction and biometry induced by daily wear and continuous wear of two different silicone hydrogel (SiH) materials. METHODS: Forty-five subjects were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to wear one of the two silicone hydrogel materials: Lotrafilcon A or Balafilcon A lenses on either a daily or continuous wear basis. Measurements of objective refraction, axial length, anterior chamber depth, corneal curvature, and the rate of peripheral corneal flattening were performed before and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after initial fitting. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent refractive error increased in the myopic direction in all contact lens groups across time (p < 0.001). Axial length was the main biometric contributor to the development of myopia. After 18 months of lens wear, subjects in the Lotrafilcon A group showed the greater mean increase in myopia (i.e., -0.50 D). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that increases in myopia, similar if not higher than those found to occur normally in young adult noncontact lens wearers, still occur with silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. The main biometric contributor to the progression of myopia was an increase in axial length. Differences between our results and those of previous studies with silicone hydrogel contact lenses could be attributed to the differing populations used in which both age and occupation may have played a role.     

Use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses by Australian optometrists

Background: Prior to the launch of silcone hydrogel (Si‐H) materials in Australia in 1999, only 1.6 per cent of lenses were prescribed on a continuous wear basis. Methods: One thousand surveys were distributed randomly to practitioners in Australia during January 2000, 2001 and 2002 (total surveys 3,000). Each anonymous survey requested data about the next 10 patients fitted with contact lenses, including date, age, gender, new fitting or refitting, lens material type, lens design, frequency of replacement, modality of wear, uses per week and care regimen. Results: Twenty per cent (599) were returned, reporting data on 5,976 fittings. A total of 710 fittings used Si‐H contact lenses (11.9 per cent), which represented 18.6 per cent of all soft lens fittings. During the three years, the proportion of practitioners prescribing Si‐H lenses increased from 42.2 to 52.5 per cent. In 2000, 43.8 per cent were daily wear, which decreased to 32.2 per cent by 2002. The solution system of choice for daily wear lenses was multipurpose solutions (98.4 per cent); the only alternative was hydrogen peroxide systems. Continuous wear represented 11.7 per cent of all fittings, ofwhich 85.7 per cent were Si‐H, 3.0 per cent RGP lenses and 11.3 per cent conventional hydrogels. For continuous wear, 79.0 per cent of fittings were to existing wearers, whereas for daily wear, 59.4 per cent were existing wearers. More males were prescribed Si‐H continuous wear contact lenses, while females were more likely to be prescribed Si‐H on a daily wear basis. Discussion: Si‐H contact lenses were introduced to the Australian market as a continuous wear contact lens, yet many practitioners use this product for daily wear with multipurpose solutions. By 2002, more practitioners were prescribing Si‐H contact lenses for continuous wear than in 2000, suggesting a growing confidence in that product for that mode of wear. A comparison with an earlier survey shows there is an increase in continuous wear from 1.6 per cent to 11.7 per cent over a five‐year period.     

Contact lenses as a drug delivery device for epidermal growth factor in the treatment of ocular wounds

Background: This work was conducted to investigate the uptake and release of epidermal growth factor (EGF) from hydrogel contact lenses and to determine whether the released protein would be therapeutically active in a rabbit corneal epithelial defect model of ocular trauma, prior to use in humans. Methods: The uptake and release of EGF from hydrogel contact lens materials were determined by high‐pressure liquid chromatography. Contact lenses composed of vasurfilcon A or lotrafilcon A (containing silicone) were incubated in a source solution containing 0.4 ppm EGF for seven hours. To determine the kinetics of drug uptake into the contact lens matrix, drug concentration in the source solution was measured at zero, one, 60, 240 and 420 minutes. To determine the kinetics of release, loaded contact lenses were immersed in a recipient solution of phosphate‐buffered saline. Therapeutic activity in vivo was investigated by placing prepared lenses on the surface of abraded corneas of New Zealand White rabbits, with abraded corneas of contralateral eyes used as controls. Control eyes were treated with contact lenses placed in saline for injection. Wound closure was assessed hourly. Results: Uptake and release of EGF were demonstrated for vasurfilcon A but not lotrafilcon A contact lens materials. The retention time of EGF released from vasurfilcon A contact lenses was similar to control EGF not exposed to contact lens polymers. The greatest adsorption of EGF into the lens material occurred within approximately 120 minutes, with a flattening of the rate of uptake thereafter. Abraded eyes in rabbits showed a significantly higher overall healing rate for EGF‐treated contact lenses compared with control eyes (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: EGF can be delivered from some but not all hydrogel materials. Lens materials composed of silicone may not be useful for delivering EGF to the eye. EGF‐treated contact lenses may be a useful device to facilitate healing of ocular wounds.