Upper leg conduction time distinguishes demyelinating neuropathies

Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether differentiation between demyelinating and axonal neuropathies could be enhanced by comparing conduction time changes in defined segments of the total peripheral nerve pathway. Methods: Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were elicited by cathodal stimulation of the tibial nerve at the ankle and popliteal fossa, and by paravertebral neuromagnetic stimulation at proximal and distal cauda equina while recording from muscles of the foot, shin, and thigh. Segmental conduction times were calculated in normal subjects; in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy, distal symmetric diabetic neuropathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, acute and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; and in patients with anti–myelin‐associated glycoprotein, myelomatous, and Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1a polyneuropathies. Results: Distal cauda equina latency and CMAP duration and segmental conduction times in upper leg and cauda equina facilitated differentiation of demyelinating from axonal neuropathies, even in the presence of a range of reduced amplitude CMAPs. Conclusions: Within the demyelinating neuropathy spectrum, it was further possible to distinguish subtypes. Muscle Nerve, 2011     

High resolution sonography in the evaluation of the peripheral nervous system in polyneuropathy – a review of the literature

Clinical, laboratory and electrodiagnostic studies are the mainstay in the diagnosis of polyneuropathy. An accurate etiological diagnosis is of paramount importance to provide the appropriate treatment, prognosis and genetic counselling. High resolution sonography of the peripheral nervous system allows nerves to be readily visualized and to assess their morphology. Ultrasonography has brought pathophysiological insights and substantially added to diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions amongst mononeuropathies. In this study the literature on its clinical application in polyneuropathy is reviewed. Several polyneuropathies have been studied by means of ultrasound: Charcot–Marie–Tooth, hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Guillain‐Barré syndrome, multifocal motor neuropathy, paraneoplastic polyneuropathy, leprosy and diabetic neuropathy. The most prominent reported pathological changes were nerve enlargement, increased hypo‐echogenicity and increased intraneural vascularization. Sonography revealed intriguingly different patterns of nerve enlargement between inflammatory neuropathies and axonal and inherited polyneuropathies. However, many studies concerned case reports or case series and showed methodological shortcomings. Further prospective studies with standardized protocols for nerve sonography and clinical and electrodiagnostic testing are needed to determine the role of nerve sonography in inherited and acquired polyneuropathies.     

Ultrasound differentiation of axonal and demyelinating neuropathies

Introduction: Ultrasound can be used to visualize peripheral nerve abnormality. Our objective in this study was to prove whether nerve ultrasound can differentiate between axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies (PNPs). Methods: Systematic ultrasound measurements of peripheral nerves were performed in 53 patients (25 with demyelinating, 20 with axonal, 8 with mixed neuropathy) and 8 healthy controls. Nerve conduction studies of corresponding nerves were undertaken. Results: Analysis of variance revealed significant differences between the groups with regard to motor conduction velocity, compound muscle action potential amplitude, and cross‐sectional area (CSA) of different nerves at different locations. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed CSA measurements to be well suited for detection of demyelinating neuropathies, and boundary values of peripheral nerve CSA could be defined. Conclusions: Systematic ultrasound CSA measurement in different nerves helped detect demyelination, which is an additional cue in the etiological diagnosis of PNP, along with nerve conduction studies and nerve biopsy. Muscle Nerve 50: 976–983, 2014     

Nerve ultrasound protocol in differentiating chronic immune‐mediated neuropathies

Introduction: In this study we evaluated a new neuropathy ultrasound protocol (NUP) for differentiating chronic immune‐mediated neuropathies. Methods: The NUP was evaluated in 110 patients with clinical presentations of chronic immune‐mediated neuropathy. All patients were first evaluated clinically and electrophysiologically and divided into 4 polyneuropathy groups: (a) symmetric demyelinating; (b) symmetric axonal; (c) asymmetric demyelinating; and (d) asymmetric axonal. During step 2, the NUP was evaluated prospectively for all 4 study groups. Results: Overall, the NUP led to correct classification in 42 of 49 (85.7%) patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 13 of 15 (86.9%) with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and 5 of 5 (100%) with multifocal‐acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM). The NUP had >80% sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing CIDP, MMN, and MADSAM in all 4 study groups. Conclusions: The NUP is a useful addition in the differential diagnosis of chronic immune‐mediated neuropathies in everyday practice. Muscle Nerve 54 : 864–871, 2016     

Ultrasound of inherited vs. acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies

We compared features of nerve enlargement in inherited and acquired demyelinating neuropathies using ultrasound. We measured median and ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas in proximal and distal regions in 128 children and adults with inherited [Charcot–Marie–Tooth-1 (CMT-1) (n = 35)] and acquired [chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) (n = 55), Guillaine–Barre syndrome (GBS) (n = 21) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) (n = 17)] demyelinating neuropathies. We classified nerve enlargement by degree and number of regions affected. We defined patterns of nerve enlargement as: none, no enlargement; mild, nerves enlarged but never more than twice normal; regional, nerves normal in at least one region and enlarged more than twice normal in at least one region; diffuse, nerves enlarged at all four regions with at least one region more than twice normal size. Nerve enlargement was commonly diffuse (89 %) and generally more than twice normal size in CMT-1, but not (p < 0.001) in acquired disorders which mostly had either no, mild or regional nerve enlargement [CIDP (64 %), GBS (95 %), and MMN (100 %)]. In CIDP, subjects treated within 3 months of disease onset had less nerve enlargement than those treated later. Ultrasound identified patterns of diffuse nerve enlargement can be used to screen patients suspected of having CMT-1. Normal, mildly, or regionally enlarged nerves in demyelinating polyneuropathy suggests an acquired etiology. Early treatment in CIDP may impede nerve enlargement.     

Pathophysiology of immune‐mediated demyelinating neuropathies—Part II: Neurology

In the second part of this review we deal with the clinical aspects of immune‐mediated demyelinating neuropathies. We describe the relationship between pathophysiology and symptoms and discuss the pathophysiology of specific disease entities, including Guillain–Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, anti–myelin‐associated glycoprotein neuropathy, and POEMS syndrome. Muscle Nerve 49 : 4–20, 2014     

Peripheral neuropathy in Tangier disease: A literature review and assessment

Tangier disease (TD) (OMIM#205400) is a rare cause of inherited metabolic neuropathies characterized by marked deficiency of high‐density lipoproteins and accumulation of cholesterol esters in various tissue resulting from reverse cholesterol transport deficiency. We report a case of a patient with TD with multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with conduction block who presents with winging scapula, tongue, and asymmetric extremity weakness. We also present a review of all studies published from 1960 to 2017 regarding peripheral neuropathy in TD. Our search identified 54 patients with TD with peripheral neuropathy. Syringomyelia‐like neuropathy subtype (52.4%) was more frequent than multifocal sensorial and motor neuropathy subtype (26.2%), focal neuropathy subtype (19.1%), and distal symmetric polyneuropathy subtype (2.4%). Splenomegaly was the most common (40.7%) clinical manifestation in these patients. The pattern of electrodiagnostic abnormalities are: (1) demyelinating abnormalities were more predominant in the upper extremities than in the lower extremities and (2) slowing of motor nerve conduction was more prominent in the intermediate segment than in distal nerve segments. The sural‐sparing pattern was present in 34.6% and conduction block was present in 11.5% of the patients. Our literature review and our case showed the clinical spectrum of TD neuropathy is quite wide and that it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of non‐uniform demyelinating neuropathies.     

Diagnosis of motor neuropathy

Motor neuropathy is a clinical entity which leads to consideration of a wide spectrum of peripheral nerve disorders. Firstly, it may be distinguished from other causes of peripheral motor involvement such as muscle diseases and disorders of the neuromuscular junction. Secondly, it may be discussed in two different forms: acute and chronic. Acute chronic neuropathies are mainly observed in Guillain-Barré syndrome, in which electrophysiological studies allow us to recognize the classical demyelinating form and the axonal form. The other causes of acute motor neuropathy are mainly poliomyelitis and porphyrias. Chronic motor neuropathies are mainly observed in motor neuron diseases, mainly amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, but also Kennedy's disease and other lower motor neuron diseases which may be inherited or acquired. The other causes are multifocal motor neuropathy and the predominantly motor forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The characterization of these different types of chronic neuropathy is of major importance because of the therapeutic consequences which may lead to the proposal of specific treatments.     

Immunneuropathien

The Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are the most common immune-mediated polyneuropathies, which can show variable clinical and electrophysiological manifestations. Rarer immune-mediated neuropathies encompass paraproteinemic neuropathies (PPN), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and vasculitic neuropathies. The diagnosis usually relies on the history of symptom evolution, distribution of nerve dysfunction and particularly on characteristic features in nerve conduction studies, aided by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination and nerve biopsy findings. The therapeutic toolbox encompasses corticosteroids, immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis often accompanied by long-term immunosuppression. It is important to note that immune-mediated neuropathies selectively respond to treatment and contraindications need to be considered. Despite treatment a considerable number of patients suffer from permanent neurological deficits.     

Nerve conduction studies in polyneuropathy: practical physiology and patterns of abnormality

Nerve conduction studies are an essential part of the work-up of peripheral neuropathies. Many neuropathic syndromes can be suspected on clinical grounds, but optimal use of nerve conduction study techniques (in combination with needle electromyography) allows diagnostic classification and is therefore crucial to understanding and separation of neuropathies. Multifocal motor neuropathy, for example, may clinically present as ALS. Detection of evidence of demyelination (conduction blocks) leads to the correct diagnosis and to proper treatment. Nerve conduction studies provide essential information on (1) the spatial pattern of neuropathy, (2) the pattern of abnormalities distinguishing between primarily axonal and demyelinating pathology, and (3) the severity of neuropathic damage. This information is very comprehensive since many nerves and long segments of individual nerves can be sampled. Moreover the information is extremely detailed to the extent that the cellular pathology of a patient's neuropathy is usually defined best by physiological testing rather than by biopsy. Neuropathies can be generalized, focal, or multifocal; they can be symmetric or asymmetric; they can be distally predominant or proximal and distal. Primarily axonal neuropathies mainly affect sensory nerve and compound muscle action potential amplitudes, whereas demyelinating neuropathies lead to slowing of nerve conductions, and to increased temporal dispersion or conduction block. Usually, the pattern of demyelination allows to distinguish hereditary (uniform demyelination) from acquired (segmental demyelination) neuropathies. Electrodiagnostic criteria for primary demyelination are helpful to identify acquired demyelinating neuropathies.     

Multifocal inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy: a distinct clinical entity?

BACKGROUND: Several patients have been reported with an asymmetric sensory or sensorimotor demyelinating neuropathy not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or multifocal motor neuropathy. OBJECTIVE: To present the clinical, electrophysiologic, radiologic, and pathologic features of six patients with an asymmetric sensory or sensorimotor demyelinating neuropathy. RESULTS: All six patients were initially affected in only one limb; in four patients the neuropathy progressed to other limbs in an asymmetric fashion during several years. On electrophysiologic examination, evidence of multifocal demyelination and conduction block in motor and sensory nerves was found in all patients. MRI of the brachial plexus revealed swollen nerves and an increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging in four patients. A biopsy sample taken from the brachial plexus of one patient revealed evidence of inflammation. All patients showed a beneficial response to IV immunoglobulin treatment. Thirty-four similar patients have been reported previously, many of whom were initially diagnosed as having various other (nontreatable) diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose calling this neuropathy "multifocal inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy" and considering it as a distinct clinical entity to facilitate early diagnosis of this treatable disorder.     

Nerve ultrasound in a case of multifocal motor neuropathy without conduction block

Introduction: Multifocal nerve enlargements and ultrastructural changes either corresponding or not to sites of existing conduction blocks have been described in demyelinating polyneuropathies using multiple imaging techniques. Methods: Using the emerging technique of peripheral nerve ultrasonography we investigated the peripheral nerves of a patient with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) without conduction block. Results: In this case of MMN without conduction blocks we found multifocal nerve enlargements in the ultrasonography and electrodiagnostic signs of acute and chronic denervation associated with positive anti‐GM1 IgM antibodies. Conclusions: This case shows that nerve ultrasound can be a complementary tool for diagnosing multifocal motor neuropathy without typical electrodiagnostic features. Muscle Nerve 52 : 294–299, 2015     

Blink reflex role in algorithmic genetic testing of inherited polyneuropathies

Introduction: In severely affected inherited polyneuropathy patients, primary demyelination can be difficult to determine by routine extremity limb nerve conduction studies (NCS). Blink reflexes may help classify severe polyneuropathies as either axonal or demyelinating. However, blink reflex studies have not been studied systematically in any genetically confirmed cohort. Methods: Patients with a genetic diagnosis who had undergone blink reflex testing and extremity NCS were identified retrospectively. Blink reflex R1 latency, extremity NCS, and severity were compared. Results: We identified 26 demyelinating and 23 axonal, genetically confirmed cases, including 20 with PMP22 duplications. In 12 (25%), the ulnar CMAP amplitude was ≤0.5 mV making electrophysiological classification difficult. However, the R1‐latency cutoff of >13 ms (demyelinating) robustly classified all patients regardless of severity. Conclusions: We show that blink reflex studies are reliable for identification of inherited demyelinating polyneuropathy regardless of severity and can facilitate algorithmic decisions in genetic testing. Muscle Nerve 55 : 316–322, 2017     

Ultrasonography of MADSAM neuropathy: focal nerve enlargements at sites of existing and resolved conduction blocks

Using the emerging technique of peripheral nerve ultrasonography, multiple focal nerve swellings corresponding to sites of existing conduction blocks have been described in demyelinating polyneuropathies. We report two cases of multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM). In the first, multiple focal nerve enlargements were detected by ultrasound at sites of previous conduction blocks, well after complete clinical and electrophysiological resolution. In the second case, existing proximal conduction blocks could be localized by ultrasound. Our cases highlight the importance of nerve ultrasound in identifying conduction blocks and demonstrate that ultrasonographic morphological changes may outlast functional recovery in demyelinating neuropathies.     

Immunotherapy‐responsive allodynia due to distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy

Introduction: Distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy is a distal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. It is characterized by chronic distal symmetric sensory or sensorimotor deficits. Sensory ataxia is a common clinical presentation. Nerve conduction studies typically show markedly prolonged distal motor latencies. Methods: We report 2 patients with chronic progressive generalized pain and fatigue, with normal neurological examinations except for allodynia. Results: Nerve conduction studies were typical of DADS neuropathy. Monoclonal protein studies were negative. Cerebrospinal fluid protein levels were elevated. Sural nerve biopsies revealed segmental demyelination and remyelination. One biopsy had marked endoneurial and epineurial lymphocytic infiltration. Immunomodulatory therapy alleviated the pain and fatigue and markedly improved distal motor latencies in both patients. Conclusions: DADS neuropathy can present with pain and a normal neurological examination apart from allodynia. Nerve conduction studies are necessary for diagnosis. These patients respond to immunotherapy better than typical DADS neuropathy patients with sensory ataxia. Muscle Nerve 54 : 973–977, 2016     

Testing for anti-glycolipid IgM antibodies in chronic immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathies

Antibodies to several nerve antigens have been reported in patients with chronic immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathies including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and IgM paraproteinemic demyelinating polyneuropathy. The association of some reactivities with specific neuropathies, such as IgM antibodies to the myelin-associated glycoprotein in neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy, permitted to cast some light in their pathogenetic mechanisms and introduced new useful tools in their diagnosis. Other antibodies have been variably associated with other forms of neuropathy or with neuropathy itself, casting some doubts on their diagnostic relevance in the workout of these neuropathies. This is particularly true for IgM antibodies to glycolipids, including ganglioside and sulfatides, whose possible role in immune-mediated neuropathies is still debated and will be here reviewed.     

Electrophysiological features of inherited demyelinating neuropathies: A reappraisal in the era of molecular diagnosis

The observation that inherited demyelinating neuropathies have uniform conduction slowing and that acquired disorders have nonuniform or multifocal slowing was made prior to the identification of mutations in myelin-specific genes which cause many of the inherited disorders involving peripheral nerve myelin. It is now clear that the electrophysiological aspects of these disorders are more complex than previously realized. Specifically, certain mutations appear to induce nonuniform slowing of conduction which resemble the findings in acquired demyelinating neuropathies. It is clinically important to recognize the different electrodiagnostic patterns of the various inherited demyelinating neuropathies. In addition, an understanding of the relationship between mutations of specific genes and their associated neurophysiological findings is likely to facilitate understanding of the role of these myelin proteins in peripheral nerve function and of how abnormalities in myelin proteins lead to neuropathy. We therefore review the current information on the electrophysiological features of the inherited demyelinating neuropathies in hopes of clarifying their electrodiagnostic features and to shed light on the physiological consequences of the different genetic mutations.     

Diagnostic utility of somatosensory evoked potentials in chronic polyradiculopathy without electrodiagnostic signs of peripheral demyelination

Introduction: Diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) remains uncertain when nerve conduction studies (NCS) fail to show demyelination. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who presented with clinical criteria of CIDP in whom electrodiagnostic (EDx) criteria of definite or probable CIDP were missing [axonal sensorimotor neuropathy (n = 23), normal EDx with pure sensory presentation (n = 3)]. All patients received immunomodulatory treatment. Twenty‐six patients were evaluated with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), MRI of spinal roots, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and/or nerve biopsy. Diagnosis of CIDP was considered to be confirmed in patients who responded to immunotherapy. Results: Twenty‐two of 26 patients (85%) had SSEPs reflecting abnormal proximal conduction in sensory fibers, including 14 who had only clinical and SSEP data in favor of CIDP. SSEPs were abnormal in 16 of 20 responders (80%) to immunotherapy. Conclusion: SSEP recording contributes to the diagnosis of CIDP when nerve conduction studies fail to detect peripheral demyelination. Muscle Nerve 53 : 78–83, 2016     

Clinical and Electrodiagnostic Features Of Nontraumatic Sciatic Neuropathy

Introduction: In this study we sought to characterize etiologies and features of sciatic neuropathy unrelated to penetrating nerve trauma. Methods: This investigation was a retrospective review of 109 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed sciatic neuropathies. Results: Hip replacement surgery represented the most common (34.9%) etiology, whereas inflammatory sciatic neuropathy was seen in 7.3%. Electrodiagnostic testing revealed an axonal neuropathy in 95.4% and a demyelinating neuropathy in 4.6%. Predominant involvement of the peroneal division was seen in 39.4% and was tibial in 5.5%. Nine of 31 (29.0%) patients who had MRI or neuromuscular ultrasound study showed abnormalities within the sciatic nerve. At the final visit, 46.4% of patients required assistance for ambulation. Young age, lack of severe initial weakness, and presence of tibial compound muscle action potential or sural sensory nerve action potential were predictors of favorable outcome. Discussion: Sciatic neuropathies are usually axonal on electrodiagnostic testing, affect preferentially the peroneal division, and are commonly associated with incomplete recovery. Muscle Nerve 59 :309–314, 2019