Surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcomas associated with external and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy.

AIMS: To report outcomes of adults with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RS) treated by surgery, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IORT). METHODS: From July 1988 to February 2001; 24 patients with primary and recurrent RS were diagnosed and treated. The median dose and energy of IORT delivered was 15 Gy/9meV. EBRT dose varies between 45-50 Gy. RESULTS: There were five primary and 19 recurrent tumours. One primary and five recurrent tumours underwent R0 resection. There were 12 liposarcomas and 19 grade I tumours; 13 patients developed local recurrence and three developed distant metastases.Twenty-two patients received IORT associated with EBRT: 11 developed recurrences. Six patients developed Neurotoxicity (4 grade II and 2 grade III). Disease free survival and overall survival at 5 years was 28 and 56% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT with IORT treatment is a promising technique for local control. Lower recurrence rates are associated with radical (R0) surgical procedures.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy for patients with recurrent rectal and sigmoid colon cancer in previously irradiated fields.

A retrospective study evaluated 15 patients with pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer in a previously irradiated region who received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as part of salvage therapy. Total prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) doses ranged from 45 to 79.2 Gy. Tumor resection was accomplished in 14 patients, with an exenteration performed in seven. IORT dose was 15-20 Gy. Three patients received additional EBRT as a post-operative course of 25.2 Gy in 14 fractions. Actuarial 3-year local control rate was 25%. The 3-year overall survival rate was 29%. Patients with fixed and/or bulky pelvic tumors had a local control rate of 19% at 12 months and median overall survival of 9 months. Patients with less extensive clinical presentations of anastomotic non-fixed transmural recurrence, isolated pelvic node metastasis and rectal recurrence following local excision had a local control rate of 42% at 36 months and median survival of 43 months. We conclude that clinical presentation of recurrent disease is an important prognostic factor. The value of IORT may be limited to patients with less extensive clinical presentations.     

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of radiation and surgical treatment

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with localized retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with complete surgical resection and radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 83 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty patients presented with primary disease and the remaining 23 had recurrence after previous surgical resection. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 47 months, the actuarial overall disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastasis-free survival, and local control (LC) rates were 44%, 67%, and 40%, respectively. Of the 38 patients dying of disease, local disease progression was the sole site of recurrence for 16 patients and was a component of progression for another 11 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that histologic grade was associated with the 5-year rates of DSS (low-grade, 92%; intermediate-grade, 51%; and high-grade, 41%, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis also indicated an inferior 5-year LC rate for patients presenting with recurrent disease, positive or uncertain resection margins, and age greater than 65 years. The data did not suggest an improved local control with higher doses of external-beam radiation (EBRT) or with the specific use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). Radiation-related complications (10% at 5 years) developed in 5 patients; all had received their EBRT postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative radiation therapy and aggressive surgical resection is well tolerated in patients, local disease progression continues to be a significant component of disease death. In this small cohort of patients, the use of higher doses of EBRT or IORT did not result in clinically apparent improvements in outcomes.     

Novel chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer using arterial infusion chemotherapy following the alteration of peripancreatic blood flow

Radiotherapy employing intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in combination with postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is an effective treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer. To achieve an even greater therapeutic outcome, 13 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were treated by IORT in combination with EBRT plus locally intensive arterial infusion chemotherapy. In order to increase drug delivery to the primary tumor, the splenic and major pancreatic arteries, except for the gastroduodenal artery (GDA), were embolized by radiological intervention prior to the arterial infusion chemotherapy, and the administration of gemcitabine, CDDP, and 5-FU to the primary tumors via GDA was followed during EBRT. The values of serum tumor markers were decreased in all patients, and tumor regression was detected on CT scans in 6 patients. The evaluation of survival benefit of this treatment modality is ongoing, but it did not prolong the survival time of patients with second stage lymph node metastases. One of the advantages of this method was able to perform also in charge of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy concurrently, but we experienced liver abscess in 2 patients.     

Analysis of the clinical benefit of intraoperative radiotherapy in patients undergoing macroscopically curative resection for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following macroscopically curative resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer who had undergone potentially curative total or regional pancreatectomy between 1980 and 1997 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 138 patients, 98 had a pathologically negative surgical margin and the remaining 40 patients had a positive surgical margin. The usual EBRT dose was 45-55 Gy with a daily fraction of 1.5-2.0 Gy. The median IORT dose was 25 Gy in a single fraction. RESULTS: The 2-year cause-specific survival rate of patients with pathologically negative surgical margins was 19%, and that of patients with positive margins was 4% (p < 0.005). Although the median survival time (MST) of patients with negative margins treated with IORT and EBRT was significantly longer than that of those treated with operation alone (17 vs. 11 months), no significant difference in survival curves was observed. In patients with positive surgical margins in peripancreatic soft tissue, the difference between the survival curve of patients treated with surgery alone and that of those treated with surgery and radiation therapy was borderline significant (p < 0.10). Patients receiving intraarterial or intraportal infusion chemotherapy had significantly improved survival rates compared with those who did not receive it (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although the MST was longer in patients with negative margins receiving IORT and EBRT than in those receiving no radiation, improved long-term survival by IORT and/or EBRT was not suggested. In patients with positive margins, our results obtained by IORT/EBRT were encouraging. Randomized studies with much higher patient numbers are necessary to define the role of IORT in curatively resected pancreatic cancer.     

Preoperative irradiation for tethered rectal carcinoma

Twenty-eight patients with resectable but tethered rectal carcinomas were treated with preoperative irradiation (EBRT) and surgical resection. The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival and local control rates of these 28 patients were 66 and 76%, respectively. Two patients have developed local failure only, 2 patients concurrent local failures and distant metastases, and 4 patients distant metastases only. All local failures occurred in areas of tumor adherence to unresectable structures (sacrum, pelvic side wall). Patients with tethered rectal tumors are at risk for local failure despite preoperative irradiation and surgical resection. To improve local control in this subset of patients, an intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) boost is given to areas of tumor adherence at resection following EBRT.     

Intraoperative and external beam irradiation +/- 5-FU for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Because of the poor local control rates obtained with external beam irradiation +/- chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, our institution has used intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) with electrons to deliver a single "boost" dose of radiation in 52 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma (primary, unresectable-49; primary, residual-2; and recurrent, unresectable-1). Patients received 4500-5000 rad of fractionated external beam irradiation and an IORT dose of 1750 rad (2 patients) or 2000 rad (50 patients). Acute and chronic tolerance have been acceptable. Documented local progression within either the external beam or IORT fields has been infrequent (3 of 42 evaluable patients or 7%), but there has been little, if any, change in median or long-term survival from that seen in external beam series. This is probably because of a high incidence of liver and peritoneal metastases with pancreatic cancer. A phase II pilot trial, which combines upper or total abdominal irradiation and infusion 5-FU with tumor nodal irradiation plus IORT, is in progress in our institution to evaluate tolerance and the relative incidence of abdominal failures.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate disease outcomes and complications in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study of 24 consecutive patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent secondary cytoreduction and intraoperative radiation therapy at our institution between 1994 and 2002 was conducted. After optimal cytoreductive surgery, IORT was delivered with orthovoltage X-rays (200 kVp) using individually sized and beveled cone applications. Outcomes measures were local control of disease, progression-free interval, overall survival, and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Of these 24 patients, 22 were available for follow-up analysis. Additional treatment at the time of and after IORT included whole abdominopelvic radiation, 9; pelvic or locoregional radiation, 5; chemotherapy, 6; and no adjuvant treatment, 2. IORT doses ranged from 9-14 Gy (median, 12 Gy). The anatomic sites treated were pelvis (sidewalls, vaginal cuff, presacral area, anterior pubis), para-aortic and paracaval lymph node beds, inguinal region, or porta hepatitis. At a median follow-up of 24 months, 5 patients remain free of disease, whereas 17 patients have recurred, of whom 4 are alive with disease and 13 died from disease. Five patients recurred within the radiation fields for a locoregional relapse rate of 32% and 12 patients recurred at distant sites with a median time to recurrence of 13.7 months. Five-year overall survival was 22% with a median survival of 26 months from time of IORT. Nine patients (41%) experienced Grade 3 toxicities from their treatments. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients with locally recurrent ovarian cancer, combined IORT and tumor reductive surgery is reasonably tolerated and may contribute to achieving local control and disease palliation.     

The activity of a single-agent 5-fluorouracil infusion in advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer

Although chemotherapy regimens using cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion have shown significant activity in advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer, their use requires normal renal function. The use of 5-FU infusion alone has not been evaluated in these tumors. Retrospective analysis revealed 11 patients who received 5-FU infusion alone because of poor renal function: 7 patients with recurrent disease who were previously treated with surgery and/or radiation therapy and 4 patients who received 5-FU as preoperative induction therapy for advanced disease were treated. The infusion dose consisted of 1000 mg/M2/24 hours for 96 hours for patients with previous radiation and 120-hour infusions for patients without previous radiation. The courses were repeated at 3-week intervals. Eight of 11 (72%) demonstrated a response (1 complete response [CR] and 7 partial responses [PRs]. Responses occurred in 4 of 4 (all PRs) patients with previously untreated epidermoid cancer, 1 patient with recurrent adenocystic cancer, and 3 of 6 patients with recurrent epidermoid cancer not previously treated with chemotherapy. Three patients, with no prior systemic or local therapy, who were clinical partial responders to 5-FU infusion went on to surgery and radiotherapy. Their responses were maintained for 18, 14, and 46+ months, respectively. The predominant toxicities were stomatitis (6/11, 55%) and leukopenia (2/11 patients). In this retrospective analysis, 5-FU infusion alone demonstrated good activity in head and neck cancer with tolerable toxicity. Since the number of patients is small and were selected on the basis of renal function, prospective evaluation is essential.     

Moderate dose intraoperative and external beam radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Late adverse effects (i.e. neuropathy, chronic bowel obstruction) limit the effective dose given in intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Initial results of a multi-modality treatment approach using moderate dose IORT and moderate dose EBRT are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with recurrent rectal carcinomas had IORT and EBRT after complete (R0, n = 14) or incomplete resection (R1, n = 9; R2, n = 8). The mean [ORT dose was 13.7 Gy (range 12-20 Gy) supplemented with an EBRT dose of 41.4 Gy. Twenty-two patients had preoperative EBRT and 22 patients had concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU, Leucovorine). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 28 months, 16 patients had re-recurrent disease and 11 patients had died. Nine patients failed locally (four in-field, four marginal and one anastomotic re-recurrence), three combined with distant metastasis, resulting in overall and IORT infield local control rates of 71% and 87%, respectively. Distant metastases alone were found in seven patients. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 58% and 48%, respectively. After incomplete resection the local failure rate increased (R0 21%, R1/2 35%) and the 4-year relapse-free survival rate decreased significantly (29% versus 71%) due to a markedly increased distant metastasis rate (53% versus 7%). Acute and late toxicities were not increased. CONCLUSION: The combination of moderate dose IORT and EBRT is a safe and efficacious component in a multi-modality treatment approach.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer using the Intrabeam system

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays (30-50 KV) is an innovative technique that can be used both for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and intraoperative boosting in patients affected by breast cancer. Immediately after tumor resection the tumor bed can be treated with low-distance X-rays by a single high dose. Whereas often a geographic miss in covering the boost target occurs with external beam boost radiotherapy (EBRT), the purpose of IORT is to cover the tumor bed safely. This report will focus on the feasibility and technical aspects of the Intrabeam device and will summarize our experience with side effects and local control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and June 2003 57 breast cancer patients, all eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS), were treated at the Mannheim Medical Center with IORT using the mobile X-ray system Intrabeam. The patient population in this feasibility study was not homogeneous consisting of 49 patients with primary stage I or II breast cancer, seven with local recurrence after previous EBRT and one with a second primary in a previously irradiated breast. The selection criteria for referral for IORT included tumor size, tumor cavity size, margin status and absence of an extensive intraductal component. The previously irradiated patients with local recurrences and 16 others received IORT as single modality. In all other cases IORT was followed by EBRT with a total dose of 46 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. The intraoperatively delivered dose after tumor resection was 20 Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. EBRT was delivered with a standard two-tangential-field technique using linear accelerators with 6- or 18-MV photons. Patients were assessed every three months by their radiation oncologist or surgeon during the first year after treatment and every six months thereafter. Breast ultrasound for follow-up was done every six months and mammographies once yearly. Acute side effects were scored according to the CTC/EORTC score and late side effects according to the Lent-Soma classification. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received IORT only; eight patients because they had received previous radiotherapy, 16 because of a very favorable risk profile or their own preference. Thirty-three patients with tumor sizes between 1 and 30 mm and no risk factors were treated by IORT as a boost followed by EBRT. The Intrabeam system was used for IORT. The Intrabeam source produces 30-50 KV X-rays and the prescribed dose is delivered in an isotropic dose distribution around spherical applicators. Treatment time ranged between 20 and 48 minutes. No severe acute side effects or complications were observed during the first postoperative days or after 12 months. One local recurrence occurred 10 months after surgery plus IORT followed by EBRT. In two patients distant metastases were diagnosed shortly after BCS. DISCUSSION: IORT with the Intrabeam system is a feasible method to deliver a single high radiation dose to breast cancer patients. As a preliminary boost it has the advantage of reducing the EBRT course by 1.5 weeks, and as APBI it might be a promising tool for patients with a low risk of recurrence. The treatment is well tolerated and does not cause greater damage than the expected late reaction in normal tissue.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma--the Mayo Clinic experience.

Thirteen patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinomas were treated with external beam radiation therapy (ERT) and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in combination with biliary stenting. Local treatment failure occurred in 50% of the patients treated with curative intent and an additional two patients developed distant recurrent disease. Patient morbidity was primarily related to biliary sepsis and gastrointestinal complications. There was minimal morbidity related to the IORT. Although the median survival of 16.5 months seemed to be an improvement over our previous results for ERT alone or ERT with 5-fluorouracil, the survival data are still discouraging. Further improvements in treatment will require better means of biliary bypass and increased tumour response perhaps by the use of radiosensitizers or hyperthermia in conjunction with radiation therapy.     

Sacropelvic resection and intraoperative radiation therapy: feasibility, technical description and early clinical results

Sarcomas and locally recurrent colorectal carcinomas are disease entities in which sacral resection is an effective alternative for meaningful palliation with a limited cure expectation. To provide local control, pain palliation and a marginal expectation of definitive cure, a multimodality approach including external beam radiation therapy, surgical resection, and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), has been developed for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancers and primary sarcomas of the sacro-pelvic región. Seven consecutive patients (5 females; 2 males; ages, 40–75) underwent surgical exploration, sacrectomy, and IORT, between 1997 and 2000. IORT doses ranged from 10 to 12.5 Gy. External beam irradiation (EBRT) was used in six patients not previously irradiated (85%). Only 1 patient (14.2%) had received postoperative chemotherapy. Level of sacral resection: S2–S3 in 3 patients and S3–S4 in 2 patients. One patient with osteosarcoma underwent a posterior approach only, requiring removal of the posterior sacral table exclusively. An exclusively anterior approach was used in another patient with recurrent rectal cancer involving uterus, vagina and presacral fascia, requiring selective removal of the anterior sacral table. Margins: clear in 5 and microscopically involved in 2 patients. Postoperative mortality rate: 1 patient (14.2%). Three patients (42%) suffered major postoperative complications. Follow-up was available on six patients: time from surgery ranging from 1 to 36 (median 12.5) months. At the time of analysis, 5 out of 6 patients were alive without recurrent symptoms. Intensified local radiosurgical treatment with sacropelvic resection in conjunction with IORT provides palliation and offers potential for cure in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer and sacropelvic sarcomas.     

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

From December 1981 to December 1989, 20 patients with primary or recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma received 4000 to 5000 cGy of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in conjunction with surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Seventeen of 20 patients underwent complete (14 patients) or partial (3 patients) resection. Three patients had shown evidence of metastases after EBRT by the time of surgery. The 4-year actuarial local control and disease-free survival rates of the 17 patients undergoing resection were 81% and 64%, respectively. Twelve patients received IORT at the time of resection for microscopic disease (10 patients) or gross residual sarcoma (2 patients). Of the ten patients receiving IORT for microscopic tumor, one patient has died of local failure and peritoneal sarcomatosis and two patients have died of distant metastases only. The remaining seven patients are disease-free. One patient treated for gross residual sarcoma has experienced a local failure 1 year after IORT and is without disease 7 years after salvage chemotherapy. The other patient treated for gross residual sarcoma has died of local failure. Five patients did not receive IORT at the time of resection because of the extensive size of the tumor bed. Three of these patients are disease-free with one patient alive with lung metastases and one patient dying of hepatic metastases. Aggressive radiation and surgical procedures appear to provide satisfactory resectability and local control with acceptable tolerance.     

Intraoperative and conformal external-beam radiation therapy with protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is widely used for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to clarify the efficacy and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy with more intensive radiotherapy in these patients, using a combination of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), conformal external-beam radiaotherapy (EBRT), and protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Thirty patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled in this Phase II study. The treatment consisted of IORT (25 grays [Gy]), followed by EBRT (40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 times per week), and concurrent protracted 5-FU infusion (200 mg/m(2)), beginning 2-4 weeks after IORT. The authors evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of this treatment by following up patients for 12.0-28.1 months. Survival from the date of IORT was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In 11 of the 30 patients, metastatic spread was detected in the abdominal cavity at laparotomy. The full EBRT dose was administered in 28 of the 30 patients. Of the remaining 2 patients, EBRT was terminated at 8 Gy due to progression of brain metastasis and another patient did not receive EBRT or chemotherapy due to massive ascites after IORT. The overall response rate for primary pancreatic tumor on dynamic computed tomography scan was 23.3% (7 partial responses). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) was observed in 15 of the 28 patients who received the full irradiation dose (53.6%). These included anorexia, nausea, emesis, fatigue, leukopenia, and/or elevation of transaminase levels. There were no directly treatment-related deaths, but 1 patient died of hepatic failure related to late effects of irradiation after 25.6 months. The median survival time of the 30 patients was 7.8 months and the 2-year survival rate was 8.1%. The median survival time of the 19 patients without metastatic spread in the abdominal cavity was 12.9 months and that of the 11 patients with metastatic spread was 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: The present regimen of chemoradiotherapy is not superior to conventional chemoradiotherapy (EBRT and 5-FU) for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.     

Unresectable and locally recurrent rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy or bilateral internal iliac artery infusion of 5-fluorouracil

Seventy-nine patients with histopathologically verified unresectable or locally recurrent rectal cancer were nonrandomly allocated to radiotherapy or regional intra-arterial infusion of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). Fifteen patients with unresectable and 32 with locally recurrent rectal cancer were subjected to radiotherapy. The absorbed dose was 30 Gy in patients with an unresectable tumor and 45 Gy in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Six patients with unresectable and 26 with locally recurrent rectal cancer received bilateral internal iliac artery infusion of 5-FU in a median dose of 7.5 g. There was no difference in survival between the two methods of treatment. Resection of an initially unresectable tumor could be performed in 5 of 21 patients (4 after radiotherapy and 1 after chemotherapy). All except eight patients had pelvic or perineal pain before treatment. Forty of 43 (93%) patients reported pain relief after radiotherapy and 21 of 28 (75%) after infusion therapy. Ten nonresponders were subjected to alternative treatment (three to intra-arterial infusion and seven to radiotherapy). Five of these ten patients reported complete pain relief and five partial pain relief. After radiotherapy, no significant side effects or complications were observed. The infusion chemotherapy was the cause of death in one patient. In summary, similar palliation was achieved with bilateral iliac artery 5-FU-infusion and radiotherapy. Owing to the complications registered with infusion therapy, radiotherapy must be considered the treatment of choice for these patients. Patients who do not respond to radiotherapy or suffer recurrence of pelvic and perineal pain may receive further palliation from intra-arterial infusion.     

Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy in recurrent colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The installation of a dedicated linear accelerator in a shielded operating room in 1992 allowed us to start a feasibility study of intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) in colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: From March 1992 to February 1996, 28 patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma were treated with maximal surgical resection and IOERT to the pelvis (n = 20) or paraortics (n = 8). IOERT dose ranged from 10 to 20 Gy with electron energies of 6-15 MeV. Postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of 45-50 Gy was planned for the previously unirradiated patients. RESULTS: IOERT was well tolerated, but 10 (70%) of 13 patients in the previously unirradiated group did not complete the EBRT per protocol. Eight patients (29%) had some morbidity including surgically related fistula distal from IOERT sites. Two patients developed pelvic pain, which can be attributed to IOERT. Three-year local control at sites treated with IOERT was 40% (53% for previously irradiated patients and 27% for previously unirradiated patients). The 3-year actuarial overall survival was 12% (17% for previously irradiated patients and 8% for previously unirradiated patients). CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience showed that it was feasible to treat poor prognostic colorectal cancer patients with IOERT. The morbidity observed was mainly related to extensive surgery in high-risk patients. Poor local control was obtained in patients treated with low-dose IOERT alone. Hence, previously unirradiated patients are encouraged to complete the planned EBRT or, alternatively, are considered for EBRT preoperatively or are given a higher IOERT dose (up to 20 Gy) if EBRT will not be given. Since IORT doses >20 Gy are associated with nerve toxicity, we currently add limited dose EBRT in the previously irradiated group. Patients with disease located in multiple abdominal sites are no longer considered candidates for IOERT.     

Clinical outcomes of intraoperative radiation therapy for extremity sarcomas

Purpose. Radiation of extremity lesions, a key component of limb-sparing therapy, presents particular challenges, with significant risks of toxicities. We sought to explore the efficacy of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Patients. Between 1995 and 2001, 17 patients received IORT for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Indications for IORT included recurrent tumors in a previously radiated field or tumors adjacent to critical structures. Results. Gross total resections were achieved in all 17 patients. Two patients experienced locoregional relapses, six patients recurred at metastatic sites, and one patient died without recurrence. Thirty-six month estimates for locoregional control, disease free survival, and overall survival were 86%, 50%, and 78%, respectively. IORT was extremely well tolerated, with no toxicities referable to IORT. Conclusions. For patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities, IORT used as a boost to EBRT provides excellent local control, with limited acute toxicities.     

Three different intraoperative radiation modalities (electron beam, high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and iodine-125 brachytherapy) in the adjuvant treatment of patients with recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) has been used in the treatment of patients with recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma for the last 2 decades. Other intraoperative radiation modalities, such as intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IOHDR) and intraoperative iodine-125 (125I) brachytherapy, present theoretic advantages for selected patients with recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma. The experience of a single-institution series in which these three intraoperative radiation modalities were used in a nonrandomized manner is discussed in this report. METHODS: Between September 1989 and January 1997, 80 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma recurrent in the pelvis or in the paraaortic lymph nodes were treated with IOERT (28 patients), IOHDR (23 patients), or 125I brachytherapy (29 patients). RESULTS: The overall 5-year local control rate was 26% (median = 12 months; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 6-17). Tumors in paraaortic sites had significantly better local control than those in the pelvis (P = 0.03). The 5-year overall survival rate was 4% (median = 20 months; 95% CI, 17-23). Patients with microscopic residual disease (P = 0.02) and those treated with postoperative external beam irradiation (EBRT) (P = 0.0007) had statistically significant longer survival. Forty-one percent of the treated patients experienced complications: These were severe (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 4-5) in 19% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative radiation can locally control recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma in a select group of patients. Patients with localized relapses, microscopic residual tumor, and no distant metastases and those receiving additional EBRT are most likely to benefit from intraoperative irradiation. The authors now routinely recommend EBRT to all patients for whom it is suitable (including those who have had prior EBRT) and consider the combination of the intraoperative modalities whenever feasible.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients

Conventional radiotherapy after breast-conserving therapy is confined to 50-55 Gy external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the whole breast and 10-16 Gy external boost radiation to the tumour bed or brachytherapy to the tumour bed. Local recurrence rate after breast-conserving surgery varies between 5 and 18%. External boost radiation can partially miss the tumour bed and therefore can result in local failure. Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) as a high precision boost can prevent a 'geographical miss'. From October 1998 to December 2000, 156 patients with stage I and stage II breast cancer were operated upon in a dedicated IORT facility. After local excision of the tumour, the tumour bed was temporarily approximated by sutures to bring the tissue in the radiation planning target volume. A single dose of 9 Gy was applied to the 90% reference isodose with energies ranging from 4 to 15 MeV, using round applicator tubes 4-8 cm in diameter. After wound healing, the patients received additional 51-56 Gy EBRT to the whole breast. No acute complications associated with IORT were observed. In 5 patients, a secondary mastectomy had to be performed because of tumour multicentricity in the final pathological report or excessive intraductal component. 2 patients developed rib necroses. In 7 patients, wound healing problems occurred. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, no local recurrences were observed. Cosmesis of the breast was very good and comparable to patients without IORT. Preliminary data suggest that IORT given as a boost after breast-conserving surgery could be a reliable alternative to conventional postoperative fractionated boost radiation by accurate dose delivery and avoiding geographical misses, by enabling smaller treatment volumes and complete skin-sparing and by reducing postoperative radiation time by 7-14 days.