Augmentation of methamphetamine-induced behaviors in transgenic mice lacking the trace amine-associated receptor 1

The trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) is a G protein-coupled receptor that is functionally activated by amphetamine-based psychostimulants, including amphetamine, methamphetamine and MDMA. Previous studies have shown that in transgenic mice lacking the TAAR1 gene (TAAR1 knockout; KO) a single injection of amphetamine can produce enhanced behavioral responses compared to responses evoked in wild-type (WT) mice. Further, the psychostimulant effects of cocaine can be diminished by selective activation of TAAR1. These findings suggest that TAAR1 might be implicated in the rewarding properties of psychostimulants. To investigate the role of TAAR1 in the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse, the psychomotor stimulating effects of amphetamine and methamphetamine and the conditioned rewarding effects of methamphetamine and morphine were compared between WT and TAAR1 KO mice. In locomotor activity studies, both single and repeated exposure to d-amphetamine or methamphetamine generated significantly higher levels of total distance traveled in TAAR1 KO mice compared to WT mice. In conditioned place preference (CPP) studies, TAAR1 KO mice acquired methamphetamine-induced CPP earlier than WT mice and retained CPP longer during extinction training. In morphine-induced CPP, both WT and KO genotypes displayed similar levels of CPP. Results from locomotor activity studies suggest that TAAR1 may have a modulatory role in the behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-based psychostimulants. That methamphetamine-but not morphine-induced CPP was augmented in TAAR1 KO mice suggests a selective role of TAAR1 in the conditioned reinforcing effects of methamphetamine. Collectively, these findings provide support for a regulatory role of TAAR1 in methamphetamine signaling.     

Amphetamine locomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference in adolescent male and female rats neonatally treated with quinpirole

Neonatal quinpirole treatment has been shown to produce an increase in dopamine D2-like receptor sensitivity that persists throughout the subject's lifetime. The objective was to analyze the effects of neonatal quinpirole treatment on effects of amphetamine in adolescent rats using locomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference procedures. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with quinpirole (1 mg/kg) or saline from postnatal days (P)1 to P11 and raised to adolescence. For locomotor sensitization, subjects were given amphetamine (1 mg/kg) or saline every second day from P35 to P47 and were placed into a locomotor arena. In female rats, neonatal quinpirole treatment enhanced amphetamine locomotor sensitization compared with quinpirole-free controls sensitized to amphetamine. Male rats demonstrated sensitization to amphetamine, although this was muted compared with female rats, and were unaffected by neonatal quinpirole. For conditioned place preference, subjects were conditioned for 8 consecutive days (P32-39) with amphetamine (1 mg/kg) or saline and a drug-free preference test was conducted at P40. Rats treated with neonatal quinpirole enhanced time spent in the amphetamine-paired context compared with quinpirole-free controls conditioned with amphetamine, but only female controls conditioned with amphetamine spent more time in the drug-paired context compared with saline-treated controls. Increased D?-like receptor sensitivity appears to have enhanced the behavioral effects of amphetamine, but these effects were more prevalent in adolescent female rats compared with male rats.     

Comparison of dopamine D1 and D5 receptor knockout mice for cocaine locomotor sensitization

RATIONALE: There is compelling support for the contribution of dopamine and the D1R-like (D1R, D5R) receptor subfamily to the behavioral and neural effects of psychostimulant drugs of abuse. The relative roles of D1R and D5R subtypes in mediating these effects are not clear. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to directly compare (C57BL/6J congenic) D1R knockout (KO) and D5R KO mice for baseline locomotor exploration, acute locomotor responses to cocaine, and locomotor sensitization to repeated cocaine administration, and to examine cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) in D5R KO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: D1R KO, D5R KO, and wild-type (WT) were assessed for baseline open field exploration, locomotor-stimulating effects of 15 mg/kg acute cocaine and sensitized locomotor responses to cocaine after repeated home cage treatment with 20 or 30 mg/kg cocaine. D5R KO and WT were tested for CPP to 15 mg/kg cocaine. RESULTS: D1R KO showed modest basal hyperactivity and increased center exploration relative to WT. Acute locomotor responses to cocaine were consistently absent in D1R KO, but intact in D5R KO. D5R KO showed normal locomotor sensitization to cocaine and normal cocaine CPP. D1R KO failed to show a sensitized locomotor response to 30 mg/kg cocaine. Failure to sensitize in D1R KO was not because of excessive stereotypies. Surprisingly, D1R KO showed a strong trend for sensitization to 20 mg/kg cocaine. CONCLUSIONS: D5R KO does not alter acute or sensitized locomotor responses to cocaine or cocaine CPP. D1R KO abolishes acute locomotor response to cocaine, but does not fully prevent locomotor sensitization to cocaine at all doses.     

Role of D1-like receptors in amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization: a study using D1A receptor knockout mice

RATIONALE: The role played by D(1)-like receptors in amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization has been examined using both the D(1)-like receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, and the D(1A) receptor knockout mouse (i.e. D(1A)-deficient mice). Studies using these two approaches have provided conflicting evidence about the importance of D(1)-like receptors for amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine: (a) whether D(1A)-deficient mice exhibit amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization after 3 and 17 drug abstinence days, and (b) whether SCH 23390, which binds to both D(1A) and D(1B) receptor subtypes, blocks development of amphetamine sensitization in wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice. METHODS: In the first experiment, adult wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice were injected with amphetamine (0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 mg/kg, IP) for 7 consecutive days. In the second experiment, wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice were pretreated with SCH 23390 (0, 0.15, or 0.5 mg/kg, IP) 30 min prior to being injected with amphetamine (0 or 8 mg/kg, IP). After each daily amphetamine injection, mice were placed in activity chambers where distance traveled (i.e. horizontal locomotor activity) was measured for 60 min. On the test days, which occurred after 3 or 17 drug abstinence days, mice were injected with 1 mg/kg amphetamine and locomotion was measured for 120 min. RESULTS: Both wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice exhibited amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization. Pretreatment with 0.5 mg/kg SCH 23390 blocked the development of locomotor sensitization in wild-type mice, but did not alter the sensitized responding of D(1A)-deficient mice. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that D(1)-like receptors are necessary for the development of amphetamine sensitization in wild-type mice, while neither the D(1A) nor D(1B) receptor subtypes are necessary for the amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization of D(1A)-deficient mice. A possible explanation for these conflicting results is that D(1A)-deficient mice may have a compensatory mechanism (not involving D(1B) receptors) that allows them to exhibit amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in the absence of the D(1A) receptor.     

GABA(A) alpha 1 subunit knock-out mice do not show a hyperlocomotor response following amphetamine or cocaine treatment

The GABA(A) receptor system provides the major inhibitory control in the CNS, with the alpha 1 beta 2 gamma 2 subunit combination being the most abundant and widely distributed form of the receptor. The alpha1 subunit knock-out (alpha1 KO) mice had a surprisingly mild overt phenotype, despite having lost approximately 60% of all GABA(A) receptors. The alpha1 KO mice had normal spontaneous locomotor activity, but were more sensitive to the sedating/ataxic effects of diazepam than wildtype (WT) mice. Pharmacological modulation of dopamine and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors also produced altered responses in alpha1 KO mice compared with WT mice. As expected, the NMDA receptor antagonist MK801, amphetamine and cocaine increased locomotor activity in WT mice. Although MK801 increased locomotor activity in alpha1 KO mice, amphetamine and cocaine induced stereotypy not hyperlocomotion. Binding studies showed no gross changes in the total number of D1, D2 or NMDA receptors. Furthermore, pre-pulse inhibition of acoustic startle and the effects of cocaine in conditioned place preference were similar in both alpha1 KO and WT mice, indicating selective rather that global changes in response to dopaminergic agents. These data demonstrate subtle changes in behaviours mediated by neurotransmitters other than GABA in alpha1 KO mice and suggest that compensation may have occurred beyond the GABAergic system.     

alpha(2A)-Adrenoceptors regulate d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and behavioural sensitization in mice

Stimulants, such as d-amphetamine, enhance the release of dopamine in the central nervous system (CNS) and induce locomotor activation in mice. When amphetamine is administered repeatedly, the locomotor activation is progressively increased. This behavioural sensitization may be associated with the development of drug craving, addiction and dependence. Also noradrenergic mechanisms participate in the mediation of the effects of psychostimulants. In this study we show that mice lacking the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor subtype A (alpha(2A)-AR knock-out (KO) on C57Bl/6J background) are supersensitive to the acute locomotor effects of d-amphetamine (5 mg/kg) in a novel environment compared to wild-type (WT) control mice. When both genotypes were treated repeatedly with d-amphetamine (2 mg/kg) they developed locomotor hyperactivation (sensitization), but its amplitude was lower in alpha(2A)-AR KO mice. Development of hyperactivation was reduced in both genotypes by pretreatment with the selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, atipamezole (1 mg/kg). Acute atipamezole also attenuated the expression of d-amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitization especially in WT mice. Interestingly, alpha(2A)-AR KO mice failed to exhibit persistent sensitization after 2 weeks of abstinence from repeated d-amphetamine. Rewarding properties of d-amphetamine, measured by conditioned place preference, were similar in both genotypes. These findings indicate that d-amphetamine-induced acute and sensitized locomotor effects are controlled by alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. Drugs antagonizing the alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor subtype may provide a novel approach for reducing drug sensitization and motor complications caused by dopaminergic agents.     

Chronic blockade of neurotensin receptors strongly reduces sensitized, but not acute, behavioral response to D-amphetamine.

This study investigated the effect of a chronic blockade of neurotensin (NT) receptors on the sensitized behavioral response to amphetamine using a nonpeptide NT receptor antagonist, SR 48692. Rats received four injections of D-amphetamine (0.5 or 1 mg/kg, IP) every other day (day 1, 3, 5 and 7) and were then challenged with the same dose of amphetamine after a 6-day withdrawal (day 14) to establish the presence of locomotor sensitization. Daily administration of SR 48692 (1 mg/kg, IP) throughout the amphetamine regimen (day 1 to day 14) almost completely blocked the sensitized locomotor response to amphetamine without affecting stereotyped behaviors (experiment 1). The decreased amphetamine-induced sensitization in chronically SR 48692-treated rats did not appear to result from an influence on basal locomotor activity, as chronic SR 48692 treatment did not modify the spontaneous locomotor activity developed in response to mild stresses (experiment 2). Moreover, we showed that chronic pretreatment with SR 48692 (1 mg/kg, 14 daily IP injections) had no effect on the locomotor activation induced by a single IP administration of amphetamine (experiment 3). These data suggest that a sustained blockade of NT receptors considerably reduces the sensitized behavioral response to amphetamine without altering the acute effect of this psychostimulant or the locomotor activation induced by a mild stress. This ability of SR 48692 to specifically reduce the behavioral sensitization to amphetamine suggests that NT receptor antagonists could have potential clinical utility in the treatment of some psychiatric disorders.     

Modulation of the locomotor responses induced by D1-like and D2-like dopamine receptor agonists and D-amphetamine by NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptor agonists and antagonists in the core of the rat nucleus accumbens

Dopamine and glutamate interactions in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) play a crucial role in both the development of a motor response suitable for the environment and in the mechanisms underlying the motor-activating properties of psychostimulant drugs such as amphetamine. We investigated the effects of the infusion in the NAcc of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor agonists and antagonists on the locomotor responses induced by the selective D(1)-like receptor agonist SKF 38393, the selective D(2)-like receptor agonist quinpirole, alone or in combination, and D-amphetamine. Infusion of either the NMDA receptor agonist NMDA, the NMDA receptor antagonist D-AP5, the non-NMDA receptor antagonist CNQX, or the non-NMDA receptor agonist AMPA resulted in an increase in basal motor activity. Conversely, all of these ionotropic glutamate (iGlu) receptor ligands reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by focal infusion of D-amphetamine. Interactions with dopamine receptor activation were not so clear: (i). infusion of NMDA and D-AP5 respectively enhanced and reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by the infusion of the D(1)-like receptor agonist of SKF 38393, while AMPA or CNQX decreased it; (ii). infusion of NMDA, D-AP5, and CNQX reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by co-injection of SKF 38393+quinpirole--a pharmacological condition thought to activate both D(1)-like and D(2)-like presynaptic and postsynaptic receptors, while infusion of AMPA potentiated it; (iii). infusion of either NMDA, D-AP5 or CNQX, but not of AMPA, potentiated the decrease in motor activity induced by the D(2)-like receptor agonist quinpirole, a compound believed to act only at presynaptic D(2)-like receptors when injected by itself. Our results show that NMDA receptors have an agonist action with D(1)-like receptors and an antagonist action with D(2)-like receptors, while non-NMDA receptors have the opposite action. This is discussed from a anatamo-functional point of view.     

Differential ability of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agonists to induce and modulate expression and reinstatement of cocaine place preference in rats

Rationale D1-Like agonists are self-administered by drug-naive animals, whereas D2-like agonists reinstate cocaine-seeking behavior, but the rewarding and reinstating effects of D1- and D2-like agonists in pavlovian-based conditioned place preference are equivocal. Objective To compare the ability of D1 and D2 agonists to produce conditioned place preference with their modulation of expression and reinstatement of an established cocaine place preference. Methods Using an unbiased procedure, we measured the place preference induced by the D1 receptor agonist SKF 81297 and the D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole in drug-naive or cocaine-exposed rats. The rewarding effects of the D1 agonists SKF 82958, ABT-431, A-77636, and the D2/D3 receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT were also tested. Additionally, we tested the ability of SKF 81297 and quinpirole to modulate expression and reinstatement of an established cocaine place preference. Results The D1 receptor agonists SKF 81297, SKF 82958, and ABT-431 produced dose-dependent conditioned place preferences, whereas A-77636 produced only place aversion, and the D2/D3 agonists quinpirole and 7-OH-DPAT were without effect in drug naive rats. In cocaine-treated rats, SKF-81297-induced place preference was reduced, whereas quinpirole-induced place preference was revealed. Pretreatment using either D1 or D2/D3 agonists blocked expression of an established cocaine place preference, but only the D1 agonist SKF 81297 and cocaine dose-dependently reinstated an extinguished cocaine place preference, whereas the D2/D3 agonist quinpirole induced place aversion but failed to alter cocaine-induced reinstatement. Conclusions D1, but not D2/D3, agonists mediate rewarding effects and reinstatement of cocaine place preference, but the reinstating effects differ markedly from self-administration paradigms.     

Paradoxical constitutive behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in mice lacking 5-HT2A receptors

Rationale

Although locomotor response to d-amphetamine is considered as mediated by an increased release of dopamine in the ventral striatum, blockade of either α1b-adrenergic or 5-HT_2A receptors almost completely inhibits d-amphetamine-induced locomotor response in mice. In agreement with this finding, mice lacking α1b-adrenergic receptors hardly respond to d-amphetamine. However, we show here that, paradoxically, mice lacking 5-HT_2A receptors (5-HT_2A-R KO) exhibit a twofold higher locomotor response to d-amphetamine than wild-type (WT) littermates.

Objectives

To explore why there is a discrepancy between pharmacological and genetic 5-HT_2A receptor blockade.

Materials and methods

Locomotor response and behavioral sensitization to d-amphetamine were measured in presence of prazosin and/or SR46349B, α1b-adrenergic, and 5-HT_2A receptor antagonists, respectively.

Results

Repeating amphetamine injections still increases 5-HT_2A-R KO mice locomotor response to d-amphetamine at a level similar to that of sensitized WT mice. SR46349B (1 mg/kg) has, as expected, no effect in 5-HT_2A-R KO mice. One milligrams per kilogram of prazosin completely blocks d-amphetamine-induced locomotor response in 5-HT_2A-R KO naïve animals but 3 mg/kg is necessary in sensitized 5-HT_2A-R KO mice.

Conclusions

Because naïve 5-HT_2A-R KO mice exhibit an increased cortical noradrenergic response to d-amphetamine, our data suggest that repeated d-amphetamine modifies noradrenergic transmission in 5-HT_2A-R KO mice. Stimulation of specific 5-HT_2A receptors would inhibit noradrenergic neurons. Dramatic decrease in SR46349B efficiency in sensitized WT mice indicates that a disruption of the regulating role of 5-HT_2A receptors on noradrenergic transmission occurs during sensitization and thus represents the physiological basis of behavioral sensitization to d-amphetamine.     

Accumbal dopamine D2 receptor function is associated with individual variability in ethanol behavioral sensitization

Striatal dopamine D2 receptors have been implicated in the development of behavioral sensitization after repeated exposure to drugs of abuse. There are clear individual differences in the level of sensitization to ethanol among species and even among individuals from the same strain. Albino Swiss mice treated with ethanol (2.2 g/kg) have been shown to present clear variations in the development of sensitization. While some mice developed ethanol (EtOH) induced sensitization, others did not. This variability was associated with differences in D2 dopaminergic receptor binding. In the present study, we evaluated the functional relevance of dopamine D2 receptor by measuring, in sensitized and non-sensitized mice, the locomotor response to a D2 receptor agonist (quinpirole, 0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg i.p. or 0.01 and 0.2 μg/side intra-accumbens) or antagonist (sulpiride, 10 or 50 mg/kg i.p. or 0.02 μg/side intra-accumbens + ethanol i.p.). Whereas the systemic administration of quinpirole decreased locomotor activity in a similar way in all the groups, intra-nucleus accumbens (NAc) administration induced significantly higher locomotor stimulation in the sensitized group alone. Our data show that functionally hyperresponsive D2 receptors are present in the NAcs of sensitized but not non-sensitized mice, suggesting that this could be a biomarker of behavioral sensitization. Furthermore, i.p. administration of sulpiride blocked the expression of sensitization in the sensitized group, and intra-NAc administration attenuated it, indicating that the activation of accumbal D2 receptors is essential for the expression of EtOH behavioral sensitization. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.     

Differential effects of clorgyline on sensitization to quinpirole in rats tested in small and large environments

Rationale Cotreatment with clorgyline shifts the development of sensitization to the D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist quinpirole from locomotion to mouthing, an effect apparently unrelated to the monoamine oxidase inhibition property of clorgyline. This phenomenon was demonstrated in rats examined in small activity chambers. However, like with other psychostimulant drugs, sensitization to quinpirole is modulated by environmental context. It is not known whether the clorgyline cotreatment effect is likewise influenced by the environment.Objective To determine the generality of the clorgyline effect on behavioral sensitization by evaluating the effects of clorgyline cotreatment on sensitization to quinpirole in two different environments: a small activity chamber and a large open field.Methods Male rats received eight injections of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg, twice weekly) in an open field or activity chamber; one group in each environment received a constant infusion of clorgyline (1 mg/kg/day via osmotic minipumps) while the other group served as the sham surgery control. For quinpirole injection 7 or 8, rats were tested in the alternate environment.Results In activity chambers, clorgyline cotreatment switched sensitization to quinpirole from locomotion to mouthing. In the open field, clorgyline cotreatment increased mouthing and expanded the explored space without a change in path stereotypy or the amount of locomotion compared to treatment with quinpirole alone.Conclusions Structure of the environment can modulate the clorgyline cotreatment effect on behavioral sensitization to quinpirole. The behavioral profiles produced by clorgyline cotreatment in the two environments resembled the behavioral effects observed with quinpirole and D1 agonist cotreatment. It is suggested that clorgyline cotreatment produces a behavioral profile characteristic of enhanced dopamine D1 and D2 receptor costimulation.     

Role of 5-HT(1B) receptors in the sensitization to amphetamine in mice.

The present study was designed to determine how 5-HT(1B) receptor ligands affected the development or the expression phase of sensitization to the amphetamine-induced locomotor response in mice. Mice were treated repeatedly (for 5 days) with amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg) in combination with either vehicle, N-[3-[3-(dimethylamino)ethoxy]-4-methoxyphenyl]-2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-carboxamide hydrochloride (SB 216641; an antagonist of 5-HT(1B) receptors), 3-(1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridyl)-5-propoxypyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridine (CP 94,253; an agonist of 5-HT(1B) receptors), or SB 216641+CP 94,253; afterwards, on day 10, they received a challenge dose of amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg). In another experiment, mice were given either vehicle or amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg) for 5 days, and were then challenged with amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg) in combination with vehicle, SB 216641, or CP 94,253 on day 10. Locomotor hyperactivity induced by acute administration of amphetamine (day 1) was dose-dependently inhibited by SB 216641 and enhanced by CP 94,253, but not affected by a combination of SB 216641+CP 94,253. The 5-HT(1B) receptor ligands affected similarly the behavioral response to the challenge dose of amphetamine on day 10 (ca. 55-110% more potent than the response to its first administration) when they were combined with the psychostimulant during the development phase (days 1-5) of sensitization. On the other hand, neither SB 216641 nor CP 94,253 administered together with the challenge dose of amphetamine (day 10) affected its behavioral hyperactivity effect in mice treated repeatedly (days 1-5) with the psychostimulant alone. Our results suggest that 5-HT(1B) receptors may play a permissive role in the development, but not expression, of behavioral sensitization, as well as in the acute locomotor response to amphetamine in mice.     

Behavioral responses to a D1 dopamine agonist in weanling rats treated neonatally with cocaine and delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

We determined whether neonatal exposure to cocaine with or without delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) altered the behavioral responses of weanling rats to the full D1 dopamine (DA) agonist SKF 81297. Rats were injected SC once daily from postnatal day (PD) 1 through 5 with cocaine (20 mg/kg), the same dose of cocaine plus THC (10 mg/kg), or drug vehicle. On PDs 24, 25, or 26, male and female littermates were administered 3 or 10 mg/kg of SKF 81297 or saline vehicle, and then tested 15 min later in an open-field apparatus. Neither neonatal drug treatment nor gender influenced the behavioral responses to SKF 81297. The drug challenge did, however, produce several dose-dependent behavioral effects, including increases in locomotor activity, line crossing, sniffing, and headshakes, and a decreased incidence of rearing, grooming, and stationary behavior. Furthermore, even though earlier administration of cocaine and THC failed to alter D1 receptor sensitivity, animals in both neonatal treatment groups exhibited an overall increase in grooming behavior and a decrease in sniffing compared to controls when the results were combined across doses of SKF 81297. These findings indicate that early postnatal exposure to cocaine can alter certain behaviors independently of functional changes in the D1 receptor system.     

The role of the polymorphic efflux transporter P-glycoprotein on the brain accumulation of d-methylphenidate and d-amphetamine.

The psychostimulant medications methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamine (AMP), available in various ratios or enantiopure formulations of their respective active dextrorotary isomers, constitute the majority of agents used in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Substantial interindividual variability occurs in their pharmacokinetics and tolerability. Little is known regarding the potential role of drug transporters such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in psychostimulant pharmacokinetics and response. Therefore, experiments were carried out in P-gp knockout (KO) mice versus wild-type (WT) mice after intraperitoneal dosing (2.5 mg/kg) of d-MPH or (3.0 mg/kg) of d-AMP. After the administration of each psychostimulant, locomotor activity was assessed at 30-min intervals for 2 h. Total brain-to-plasma drug concentration ratios were determined at 10-, 30-, and 80-min postdosing time-points. The results showed no statistically supported genotypic difference in d-AMP-induced locomotor activity stimulation or in brain-to-plasma ratio of d-AMP. As for d-MPH, the P-gp KO mice had 33% higher brain concentrations (p < 0.05) and 67.5% higher brain-to-plasma ratios (p < 0.01) than WT controls at the 10-min postdosing timepoint. However, in spite of elevated brain concentrations, d-MPH-induced locomotor activity increase was attenuated for P-gp compared with that for WT mice. These data indicate that P-gp has no apparent effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of d-AMP. In addition, d-MPH is a relatively weak P-gp substrate, and its entry into the brain may be limited by P-gp. Furthermore, the mechanism by which d-MPH-induced locomotor activity was attenuated in P-gp KO mice remains to be elucidated.     

Behavioral and neurochemical consequences of repeated nicotine treatment in the serotonin-depleted rat

RATIONALE: Repeated exposure to addictive drugs causes neuroadaptive alterations that are proposed to increase the incentive motivation to consume drugs and to decrease the ability to inhibit such inappropriate motivational impulses and responses. Together, these behavioral consequences of drug intake may underlie the compulsive drug-seeking and -taking behaviors observed in drug abuse. OBJECTIVE: Brain serotonin (5-HT) has been implicated in these mechanisms and this study therefore investigated the consequences of brain 5-HT depletion on the behavioral and neurochemical effects induced by repeated daily nicotine treatment (15 days) in male rats. METHODS: The effects of the present pharmacological manipulations were evaluated behaviorally (locomotor activity, the elevated plus-maze) and neurochemically (microdialysis, brain biochemistry). RESULTS: Depletion of brain 5-HT produced behavioral disinhibition in the elevated plus-maze. In 5-HT-depleted animals, nicotine-induced locomotor sensitization was observed on treatment days 5, 10, and 15, but only on day 15 in the sham-operated rats. Postsensitization, the locomotor stimulatory effects of amphetamine and the dopamine receptor agonists SKF 38,393, apomorphine, and quinpirole were decreased in 5-HT-depleted animals, an effect that appeared to be more pronounced in nicotine-treated rats. Repeated nicotine treatment sensitized the nicotine-induced elevation of the extracellular accumbal dopamine levels in sham-operated, but not in 5-HT-depleted rats, and was also associated with decreased D2 autoreceptor function in both nicotine-treated experimental groups. CONCLUSIONS: Depletion of brain 5-HT, which produces behavioral disinhibition, may slightly facilitate the overall expression of locomotor sensitization to nicotine and differentially affect the pre- and postsynaptic neuroadaptive events involved in the expression of these phenomena.     

Differential contributions of dopamine D1, D2, and D3 receptors to MDMA-induced effects on locomotor behavior patterns in mice.

MDMA or 'ecstasy' (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) is a commonly used psychoactive drug that has unusual and distinctive behavioral effects in both humans and animals. In rodents, MDMA administration produces a unique locomotor activity pattern, with high activity characterized by smooth locomotor paths and perseverative thigmotaxis. Although considerable evidence supports a major role for serotonin release in MDMA-induced locomotor activity, dopamine (DA) receptor antagonists have recently been shown to attenuate these effects. Here, we tested the hypothesis that DA D1, D2, and D3 receptors contribute to MDMA-induced alterations in locomotor activity and motor patterns. DA D1, D2, or D3 receptor knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice received vehicle or (+/-)-MDMA and were tested for 60 min in the behavioral pattern monitor (BPM). D1 KO mice exhibited significant increases in MDMA-induced hyperactivity in the late testing phase as well as an overall increase in straight path movements. In contrast, D2 KO mice exhibited reductions in MDMA-induced hyperactivity in the late testing phase, and exhibited significantly less sensitivity to MDMA-induced perseverative thigmotaxis. At baseline, D2 KO mice also exhibited reduced activity and more circumscribed movements compared to WT mice. Female D3 KO mice showed a slight reduction in MDMA-induced hyperactivity. These results confirm differential modulatory roles for D1 and D2 and perhaps D3 receptors in MDMA-induced hyperactivity. More specifically, D1 receptor activation appears to modify the type of activity (linear vs circumscribed), whereas D2 receptor activation appears to contribute to the repetitive circling behavior produced by MDMA.     

Individual differences in behavior following amphetamine,GBR-12909, or apomorphine but not SKF-38393 or quinpirole

Subjects that respond more to a novel environment show a greater locomotor response to drugs of abuse such as cocaine and amphetamine. The current study was performed to examine differences between high (HR) and low (LR) responding rats to a novel environment following administration of amphetamine, a selective dopamine uptake blocker (GBR-12909), a nonselective dopamine agonist (apomorphine), and selective dopamine D₁ and D₂/D₃ agonists. A behavioral checklist and a rating scale were used to determine the behavioral arousal caused by administration of amphetamine (0, 0.5, 2.0, and 8.0 mg/kg), GBR-12909 (0, 1.25, 5.0, and 20.0 mg/kg), apomorphine (0, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg), SKF 38393 (0, 2.5, 10, and 40 mg/kg), or quinpirole (0, 0.05, 0.5, and 5.0 mg/kg). The five drugs produced behavioral activation profiles distinct from each other. Following amphetamine administration, both HR and LR subjects showed dose dependent increases in behavioral arousal. The behaviors primarily affected were sniffing, locomotor activity, rearing, and oral activity. HR rats showed a greater overall behavioral response to amphetamine administration compared with LR rats and there were differences in specific behaviors between the two groups. Following GBR-12909 administration, all subjects showed dose dependent increases in sniffing, locomotor activity, and rearing. Differences between HR and LR were observed in sniffing, locomotor activity, and rearing behaviors. HR and LR both showed dose dependent increases in behavior following apomorphine administration. HR showed greater behavioral activation after apomorphine than LR. SKF 38393 produced pronounced increases in the amount of sniffing, grooming, and intense grooming, in addition to increasing the overall behavioral rating of all subjects, while quinpirole produced increases in sniffing, locomotor activity, and oral movements. However, the behavioral effects of SKF 38393 and quinpirole did not differ between HR and LR. These results suggest that activation of the dopamine system but probably not only one type of dopamine receptor is sufficient to produce behavioral differences between high and low responding subjects.     

Dissociable effects of the κ-opioid receptor agonists bremazocine, U69593, and U50488H on locomotor activity and long-term behavioral sensitization induced by amphetamine and cocaine

RATIONALE: Mesolimbic dopaminergic neurotransmission plays a critical role in the locomotor effects of psychostimulant drugs, but a general involvement in the induction of long-term psychostimulant sensitization is questionable. By influencing dopaminergic neurotransmission, opioid drugs can alter the behavioral effects of psychostimulants. OBJECTIVES: The effects of the kappa-opioid receptor agonists bremazocine, U69593, and U50488H on the locomotor stimulant and the long-term sensitizing effects of amphetamine and cocaine were investigated in rats. Unlike U69593 and U50488H, bremazocine is also an antagonist at mu- and delta-opioid receptors, as well as an agonist at a subtype of delta-opioid receptors inhibiting dopamine D1 receptor-stimulated adenylate cyclase. METHODS: Bremazocine, U69593, and U50488H were administered prior to amphetamine and cocaine, and locomotor activity was measured. In separate studies, the opioids were co-administered with amphetamine and cocaine for 5 days, and locomotor sensitization was assessed 3 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: Bremazocine and U69593 attenuated the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine and cocaine. U50488H attenuated the locomotor effect of cocaine and biphasically affected amphetamine-induced locomotion, i.e., suppression followed by stimulation. Bremazocine prevented the development of amphetamine-induced but not cocaine-induced long-term sensitization. Neither U69593 nor U50448H affected the induction of long-term amphetamine or cocaine sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with previous studies, the present data suggest that differential mechanisms underlie the acute stimulant versus the long-term sensitizing effects of psychostimulants, and the induction of long-term sensitization by amphetamine versus cocaine. Stimulation of kappa-opioid receptors does not seem to block the induction of long-term psychostimulant sensitization. Thus, bremazocine is likely to block the induction of amphetamine sensitization through a non-kappa-opioid receptor mechanism. We suggest that this effect of bremazocine is the result of its unique agonist action at a subtype of delta-opioid receptors, thereby acting as a functional dopamine D1 receptor antagonist. This would be consistent with the literature showing that the induction of long-term amphetamine sensitization depends on the activation of dopamine D1 receptors. In addition, the present data are in keeping with studies showing that dopamine neurotransmission is not critical for the induction of long-term cocaine sensitization.     

Dopaminergic mechanisms mediating the long-term expression of locomotor sensitization following pre-exposure to morphine or amphetamine

The role of dopaminergic mechanisms in opiate- and psychostimulant-induced long-term locomotor sensitization was investigated. To that aim, rats were behaviourally sensitized with morphine or amphetamine and 3 weeks after cessation of treatment challenged with various direct and indirect dopamine agonists. Both morphine- and amphetamine-pretreated rats displayed sensitization of the locomotor effects of amphetamine, cocaine, and the selective dopamine reuptake inhibitor GBR-12909. Sensitization of the locomotor stimulant effects of the dopamine D₂/D₃ receptor agonist quinpirole was observed in amphetamine- but not morphine-pretreated rats. In contrast, morphine-, but not amphetamine-pretreated rats appeared hyposensitive to the locomotor inhibitory effects of a low, presumably D₂-autoreceptor selective, dose of quinpirole. Neither pretreatment induced sensitization to the dopamine D₁/D₂ agonist apomorphine or the dopamine D₁ agonist SKF-82958. In fact, the locomotor stimulant effects of SKF-82958 appeared to be decreased in animals pre-exposed to amphetamine. These results suggest that functional changes in presynaptic dopamine release mechanisms represent common neuroadaptations involved in the long-term expression of morphine- and amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization. Presynaptic dopamine D₂ and postsynaptic D₂ and/or D₃ receptors are differentially involved in the expression of morphine- and amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization. In a parallel study, we report that all of the drugs that elicited sensitized locomotor responses in morphine- or amphetamine-pretreated rats caused reinstatement of previously extinguished heroin- or cocaine-seeking behaviour, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest a marked relationship between drug-seeking behaviour and drug sensitization. Received: 22 May 1998/Final version: 12 October 1998