Regular sources of medical care among persons with severe mental illness at risk of hepatitis C infection

OBJECTIVE: An estimated 19.6 percent of persons with severe mental illness are infected with the hepatitis C virus. Given the pressing need to identify and treat persons with severe mental illness who are at risk of hepatitis C infection and transmission, the authors sought to estimate the proportion of hepatitis C-positive and -negative persons with severe mental illness who have a regular source of medical care. METHOD:S: Data for this study were obtained from 777 adults with severe mental illness at four diverse geographic sites at which respondents with severe mental illness participated in a structured interview and laboratory testing for HIV infection, AIDS, hepatitis B infection, and hepatitis C infection. RESULTS: In bivariate analyses, 54.2 percent of hepatitis C-positive and 62.5 percent of hepatitis C-negative study participants with severe mental illness had a regular source of medical care. In multivariate analyses in which potential confounders were statistically controlled for, hepatitis C-positive persons with severe mental illness were less than half as likely as hepatitis C-negative persons to have a regular source of care. Being older, married, insured, or employed or having self-reported health problems increased the likelihood of receiving care. Being black or male or living in a community with high exposure to community violence lowered those odds. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need to improve access to medical care for persons with severe mental illness, especially those who may be at high risk of or are already infected with the hepatitis C virus.     

Differences in HIV care between patients with and without severe mental illness

OBJECTIVE: This study explored how HIV care differs for infected persons with and without severe mental illness. METHODS: Data were obtained through interviews with and chart review of 295 patients with severe mental illness and HIV from public mental health agencies in Los Angeles County and New York City. Data were compared with data from 1,294 HIV patients without severe mental illness from a separate national probability sample. Measures were difficulty obtaining care, whether patients recommend their HIV care provider, hospital problem score, functional health status, and disability days. RESULTS: In Los Angeles, HIV patients with severe mental illness were more likely than those without severe mental illness to have difficulty obtaining care (p<.001); to not recommend their provider (10% versus 5%, p=.007); and to have problematic hospital care (p=.001), poor health status (p=.001), and more disability days (p<.001). In New York City, HIV patients with severe mental illness were more likely than patients without severe mental illness to have difficulty obtaining care (p=.002) and not recommend their provider (p=.02). The relationship between severe mental illness and health status in Los Angeles and access in New York City became insignificant after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, drug use, and CD4 cell count. Further adjustment for higher case management rates among HIV patients with severe mental illness reduced disparities only in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe mental illness experienced more problems with HIV care than patients without severe mental illness, although high case management rates for patients with severe mental illness may have offset some problems.     

Psychiatric out-patients seen once only in South Verona and Western Australia: a comparative case-register study

OBJECTIVE: This study examined variables associated with having a once-only contact with the out-patient department of two community mental health services in Italy and Australia. METHOD: Two 8-year cohorts of patients, who had a new episode of care with out-patient psychiatric departments in South Verona and in Western Australia, were followed-up for 3 months after the first contact, to identify those patients who had no further contact with services. Potential determinants of once-only contact were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty percent of new episodes of care for persons who met the inclusion criteria of the study were once-only contacts with the service in South Verona. In Western Australia, the figure was 24%. Moreover, the proportion of once-only contact patients has increased over time in South Verona whereas, in Western Australia, it has remained stable. In Western Australia, once-only contact patients were younger whereas in South Verona they tended to be older. At both research sites, patients who had a once-only contact were more likely to be male and to have a less severe mental illness. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that only clinical characteristics were significant determinants of this pattern of contact with services consistently at both sites: the less severe the patient's diagnosis, the more likely the patient is to have a once-only contact. This may well indicate good screening at the initial point of contact by both sets of mental health service providers. Prospective studies are necessary to clarify the problem of 'once-only contact' and to organize a proper psychiatric care.     

Health maintenance organizations and persons with severe mental illness

Many if not most scenarios for reform of the U.S. health care system imply that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) will continue their rapid growth. Some advocates argue that a comprehensive health care system should offer services to the severely mentally ill on the same basis as the physically ill. Others note that severe mental illness has traditionally been addressed by a separate, social service system which, for all its deficiencies, has at least provided some level of care. Still others contend that allowing severely mentally ill persons barrier free access to health care would be prohibitively expensive. Inspired by this debate the author reviews our knowledge about HMOs and persons with severe mental illness. It is argued that workers in community mental health programs need to understand HMOs and their potential contribution to providing services for persons with severe mental illness.Supported in part by NIMH grant number R01 MH45015. A reviewer's thoughtful comments are gratefully acknowledged.     

The utility of outpatient commitment: acute medical care access and protecting health

Objectives

This study considers whether, in an easy access single-payer health care system, patients placed on outpatient commitment—community treatment orders (CTOs) in Victoria Australia—are more likely to access acute medical care addressing physical illness than voluntary patients with and without severe mental illness.

Method

For years 2000 to 2010, the study compared acute medical care access of 27,585  severely mentally ill psychiatrically hospitalized patients (11,424 with and 16,161 without CTO exposure) and 12,229 never psychiatrically hospitalized outpatients (individuals with less morbidity risk as they were not considered to have severe mental illness). Logistic regression was used to determine the influence of the CTO on the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of physical illness requiring acute care.

Results

Validating their shared and elevated morbidity risk, 53% of each hospitalized cohort accessed acute care compared to 32% of outpatients during the decade. While not under mental health system supervision, however, the likelihood that a CTO patient would receive a physical illness diagnosis was 31% lower than for non-CTO patients, and no different from lower morbidity-risk outpatients without severe mental illness. While, under mental health system supervision, the likelihood that CTO patients would receive a physical illness diagnosis was 40% greater than non-CTO patients and 5.02 times more likely than outpatients were. Each CTO episode was associated with a 4.6% increase in the likelihood of a member of the CTO group receiving a diagnosis.

Conclusion

Mental health system involvement and CTO supervision appeared to facilitate access to physical health care in acute care settings for patients with severe mental illness, a group that has, in the past, been subject to excess morbidity and mortality.

     

Ethical use of long-acting medications in the treatment of severe and persistent mental illnesses

volunteerism Mental illnesses are prevalent, cause great suffering, and are burdensome to society. Traditional "depot" antipsychotic agents are used to treat the most severely and persistently mentally ill individuals. They will soon be joined by new atypical antipsychotic medications in long-acting formulations. These long-acting medications pose special ethical issues, but may greatly benefit some people who suffer from severe and persistent mental illnesses. The objective of the current report is to highlight ethical considerations related to the use of long-acting antipsychotic medications. An analysis centering on the ethical concepts of voluntarism, beneficence, and justice is performed, integrating relevant empirical evidence and bioethics principles. Two main conceptual issues related to constraints upon voluntarism and coercion exist. Careful examination of ethically important empirical evidence suggests that voluntarism may not be perceived as an issue for some persons receiving depot antipsychotic medications. A favorable balance of benefits and risks has been documented for some individuals with severe and persistent mental illnesses. Access to care, innovative treatments, and long-acting antipsychotic medications may arise as an issue of justice and nondiscrimination in the care of mental illness. Considerations of justice indicate that long-acting medications may need to be used more frequently and earlier in the course of severe and persistent mental illness for select patients. We conclude that great care should be given to ethically important issues surrounding voluntarism, beneficent care, and equitable access to innovative psychiatric treatments, especially for persons who carry the burden of stigma as well as severe and persistent mental illness.     

Desire for information of people with severe mental illness

Purpose

To assess (1) the desire of people with severe mental illness for information on their treatment and (2) whether the desire for information is associated with socio-demographic variables, diagnosis, illness duration, therapeutic relationship, needs and symptom severity.

Methods

588 outpatients with severe mental illness were recruited in six European countries (Germany, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Switzerland, United Kingdom) during the “Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care of people with severe mental illness (CEDAR)” study (ISRCTN75841675). Desire for information was assessed by the Information subscale of the Clinical Decision Making Style Scale. Study participants with high desire for information were compared with those with moderate or low desire for information.

Results

80 % of study participants (n = 462) wanted to receive information on all aspects of their treatment (management, prognosis, alternative options for care). Participants with a high desire for information had less severe symptoms (OR = 0.988, CI = 0.977–1.000) and a better self-rated therapeutic alliance (OR = 1.304, CI = 1.130–1.508) with their clinician.

Conclusions

Most, but not all, people with severe mental illness have a high desire for information. Desire for information is associated with variables, such as therapeutic relationship and symptom severity, which are amenable to change during treatment.     

The interface of physical and mental health

Purpose

The interaction between physical and mental health is complex. In this paper we aim to provide an overview of the main components of this relationship and to identify how care could be improved for people with co-morbidities.

Methods

We performed a literature search of MedLine, Ovid and Psycinfo and identified studies that examined the association between mental illness and physical illness. We also examined the key policy documents and guidelines in this area.

Results

People with mental health conditions are at higher risk of developing physical illness, have those conditions diagnosed later and have much higher mortality rates. Conversely, people with a diagnosis of physical illness, especially cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer have a greater chance of developing a mental health problem. When both mental and physical illnesses conditions are present together, there are higher overall rates of morbidity, healthcare utilisation, and poorer quality of life.

Conclusions

Physicians and psychiatrists need to be aware of the co-occurrence of mental and physical health problems and the challenges posed for both general and mental health services. There is a need to screen appropriately in both settings to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment. Liaison psychiatry provides psychological assessment and treatment for people with physical illness, but there is a gap in the provision of physical healthcare for people with severe mental illness. There is a need for public policy to drive this forward to overcome the institutional barriers to equitable access to healthcare and for educators to reverse the tendency to teach mind and body as separate systems.     

"Difficult patients" in mental health care: a review

OBJECTIVE: This article provides an overview of what is known about "difficult patients" in mental health care. It aims to answer three main questions: What are the defining characteristics of difficult patients, how is the difficulty explained, and which treatment strategies are available? METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases was conducted for articles published between 1979 and 2004 that had "difficult patients" as their main topic, resulting in 94 eligible articles. RESULTS: Characteristics of difficult patients in psychiatric care were consistent across several studies. Explanations for these difficulties widely varied: individual, interpersonal, and social factors were identified. Interventions were described in little detail and offered relatively few specific guidelines for daily practice, although some general principles are summarized. Difficult patients are classified into three subgroups, and some prevailing discourses on difficult patients in mental health care are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies or settings exist for two of the three groups of difficult patients-those with severe mental illness (unwilling care avoiders) and those with the least severe psychiatric symptoms but the most difficult behaviors (demanding care claimers). The remaining group (ambivalent care seekers), which consists of those who seek care but exhibit ambivalent behaviors that could be interpreted as both difficult and ill, is not supported sufficiently by effective treatment strategies. Further development and research into effective interventions is suggested for this group.     

Acute and chronic psychiatric care: Establishing boundaries

Despite advances in psychiatry, a proportion of those with mental illness have episodes of severe illness, and a few of these patients may attain only partial recovery. In this respect, mental illness is similar to physical illness and systems of acute and chronic care are essential. As mental health care financing and delivery systems undergo further flux and reform, we will require clear, consensually developed definitions of levels of care, especially because of the complexities created by a legacy of a 2-tiered, public and private mental health system. This paper first will offer definitions and examples of acute and chronic illness and care. We will also address certain problems inherent to such a classification. We will then consider principles of an potential plans for a system of financing and care for the chronically mentally ill. Two existing plans will be reviewed as illustrations of innovations in chronic care. As health reform changes the financing and delivery of care for the mentally ill, an opportunity exists to integrate public and private monies and services and to improve upon the care of the acutely and chronically mentally ill.     

Assertive community treatment in Japan: results of fidelity measurements

Mental health system reform oriented toward realizing the transition from "institution-based medical treatment" to "community-based care" is now taking place in Japan. Although the number of psychiatric beds is slow to decrease, community resources are increasing, and differentiation of those services is the next challenge. Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is a service which provides 24/7 community outreach by a multidisciplinary team to persons with severe mental illness. Currently, some 10 to 15 ACT teams are providing services in Japan; this number is far from adequate. This is due to the lack of direct funding for ACT in the current mental health system. However, ACT is increasing as a result of combining available funding sources, such as psychiatric home visit nursing and welfare funding. The ACT Network, a voluntary association, was established to disseminate ACT and ensure its quality. Fidelity scales measure faithfulness to the original model. DACTS, a fidelity scale developed in the U.S., is widely used to measure ACT fidelity. In Japan, ACT Network implements a Japanese version of fidelity measurement for ACT around Japan. Results of fidelity measurements of 12 ACT teams in 2009 showed that the ACT teams were providing services which adhered more closely to the original model than in the previous year, but problems remained. Some issues, such as increasing care management in services, can be addressed through maturation of ACT teams, but other issues, such as relatively low service density and allocation of employment specialists, cannot be resolved without a funding mechanism. To disseminate ACT and support more people with severe mental illness in the community, it is necessary to build ACT into the community mental health system with sufficient funding, and to monitor its quality using measures such as fidelity scales.     

Enhancing employment services for people with severe mental illness: the challenge of the Australian service environment

OBJECTIVES: Comparatively few people with severe mental illness are employed despite evidence that many people within this group wish to obtain, can obtain and sustain employment, and that employment can contribute to recovery. This investigation aimed to: (i) describe the current policy and service environment within which people with severe mental illness receive employment services; (ii) identify evidence-based practices that improve employment outcomes for people with severe mental illness; (iii) determine the extent to which the current Australian policy environment is consistent with the implementation of evidence-based employment services for people with severe mental illness; and (iv) identify methods and priorities for enhancing employment services for Australians with severe mental illness through implementation of evidence-based practices. METHOD: Current Australian practices were identified, having reference to policy and legal documents, funding body requirements and anecdotal reports. Evidence-based employment services for people with severe mental illness were identified through examination of published reviews and the results of recent controlled trials. RESULTS: Current policy settings support the provision of employment services for people with severe mental illness separate from clinical services. Recent studies have identified integration of clinical and employment services as a major factor in the effectiveness of employment services. This is usually achieved through co-location of employment and mental health services. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal evidence-based employment services are needed by Australians with severe mental illness. Providing optimal services is a challenge in the current policy environment. Service integration may be achieved through enhanced intersectoral links between employment and mental health service providers as well as by co-locating employment specialists within a mental health care setting.     

Use of nursing homes in the care of persons with severe mental illness: 1985 to 1995

OBJECTIVE: The study examined patterns of care for persons with mental illness in nursing homes in the United States from 1985 to 1995. During that period resident populations in public mental hospitals declined, and legislation aimed at diverting psychiatric patients from nursing homes was enacted. METHODS: Estimates of the number of current residents with a mental illness diagnosis and those with a severe mental illness were derived from the 1985 and 1995 National Nursing Home Surveys and the 1987 and 1996 Medical Expenditure Surveys. Trends by age group and changes in the mentally ill population over this period were assessed. RESULTS: The number of nursing home residents diagnosed with dementia-related illnesses and depressive illnesses increased, but the number with schizophrenia-related diagnoses declined. The most substantial declines occurred among residents under age 65; more than 60 percent fewer had any primary psychiatric diagnosis or severe mental illness. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a reduced role for nursing homes in caring for persons with severe mental illness, especially those who are young and do not have comorbid physical conditions. Overall, it appears that nursing homes play a relatively minor role in the present system of mental health services for all but elderly persons with dementia.     

Attitudes towards mental illness in the Athens area: implications for community mental health intervention

Attitudes towards mental illness were measured in a probability sample of 1574 male and female adults, residents of two boroughs in the greater Athens area before the development of community mental health services in the area. The objective of this study was to identify the components of these attitudes, taking into account the fact that public opinions about mental illness influence the utilization of community mental health services and the level of reintegration of the mentally disabled into society. The instrument used to measure attitudinal dimensions was the Cohen and Struening Opinion about Mental Illness (O.M.I.) scale. Factor analysis revealed five attitude dimensions: social discrimination, social restriction, social care, integration, and etiology. Among the socio-demographic variables age, education, occupational status and place of residence up to 18 years of age affected the factors mainly, reflecting social discrimination and restriction. O.M.I. factor scores underlying the need for social care and reintegration of the mentally ill into society were found to be socially invariant, implying the need for social care and more humane treatment methods for mental patients. Certain population groups responded with rejection or suspicion and considerable fear of the mentally ill, indicating the necessity for the planning of appropriate community mental health intervention programs parallel to the development of community mental health services and psychiatric reforms in Greece.     

A comparison of type 2 diabetes outcomes among persons with and without severe mental illnesses

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes is an important comorbid medical condition associated with schizophrenia. The objective of this study was to compare glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels of patients who had type 2 diabetes and schizophrenia with those of patients who had type 2 diabetes and major mood disorders and those who had type 2 diabetes but who did not have severe mental illness. METHODS: A sample of 300 patients with type 2 diabetes was recruited from community mental health centers in the greater Baltimore region and nearby primary care clinics. Of these, 100 had schizophrenia, 101 had a major mood disorder, and 99 had no identified severe mental illness. HbA(1c), the main outcome measure, was compared between the group with schizophrenia and the other two groups. RESULTS: All three groups had HbA(1c) values above recommended levels. HbA(1c) levels were significantly lower among patients with schizophrenia than among patients who did not have severe mental illness but were not significantly different from those of patients who had major mood disorders. Patients for whom olanzapine was prescribed had higher HbA(1c) levels than those for whom other antipsychotic agents were prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: All three groups of patients require improved diabetes treatment to achieve acceptable HbA(1c) levels. There may be previously unrecognized benefits for diabetes management among persons with severe mental illnesses who are receiving regular mental heath care, but these individuals may also have risk factors that can influence diabetes outcomes and HbA(1c) levels.     

Implementation of monitoring and management guidelines for second-generation antipsychotics

It has long been known that psychiatric patients experience increased morbidity and mortality associated with a range of physical disorders. Lifestyle, inadequate health care, and a variety of other factors all contribute to the poor physical health of people with severe mental illness. Second-generation antipsychotics have gained widespread acceptance for the management of patients with schizophrenia and other forms of severe mental illness. While demonstrating several advantages over first-generation antipsychotics, second-generation antipsychotics have been found to cause or exacerbate several metabolic disorders, including diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. These disorders are closely linked and consistently associated with the development of cardiovascular disease, with varying prevalence rates depending on the second-generation antipsychotic used. As a result, several authoritative guidelines have been developed for the monitoring and management of metabolic disturbances in schizophrenia and other forms of severe mental illness. Specifically, the guidelines and recommendations generated from the Mount Sinai Conference on Medical Monitoring and the American Diabetes Association/American Psychiatric Association Consensus Development Conference on Antipsychotic Drugs and Obesity and Diabetes call for a more integrated and cooperative approach between primary care physicians and mental health care providers to improve the quality of health care for people with severe mental illness. By routinely performing physical health monitoring, referrals, and/or treatment for patients with schizophrenia and other forms of severe mental illness, mental health care providers can take a lead role in transforming the current system of fragmented mental and physical health services into a system focused on early intervention, wellness, and recovery.     

Current approaches to identifying the severely mentally ill

Mental health care is expensive to provide and resources should be targeted. Possible approaches to such a prioritization are outlined. In the United Kingdom, care is to be provided on the basis of need. The key issue is then identifying the severely mentally ill, who are most in need of mental health care. Definitions of severe mental illness used in research studies are reviewed, indicating a lack of consensus about identifying this group. Current practice in England was surveyed, by obtaining written documentation from 20 agencies on the eligibility criteria they use for deciding whether someone should receive mental health care. Government departments, user groups and professional bodies were also surveyed. The findings indicate that definitions of severe mental illness use the five dimensions of safety, informal and formal support, diagnosis, disability and duration—the SIDDD dimensions. These dimensions offer a framework for developing definitions of severe mental illness at the local level, thereby identifying the priority group for mental health care.     

Clinical characteristics and service use of persons with mental illness living in an intermediate care facility.

OBJECTIVE: The study examined the characteristics of residents living in a 450-bed intermediate care facility for persons with severe mental illness in Illinois and sought to determine the factors predicting their utilization of mental health services. METHODS: Data on 100 randomly selected residents with a chart diagnosis of schizophrenia were collected using chart review and interviews. Data for 78 residents whose diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of the residents used facility-based specialty mental health services beyond medication management, such as group therapy or a day program. Persons with the least severe psychiatric illnesses and with higher levels of motivation for overall care used the most mental health services. Thirty-five percent of the residents had been discharged to an inpatient psychiatric unit during the previous year. Residents most likely to be discharged to those settings were young men with a history of homelessness who refused facility-based health services. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent policy-driven efforts to improve care in this intermediate care facility for persons with mental illness, the facility continues to have problems addressing the mental health needs of the residents.     

Quality of diabetes care among adults with serious mental illness

OBJECTIVE: The study compared the quality of care for type 2 diabetes delivered to two groups with type 2 diabetes--adults with serious mental illness and those with no serious mental illness--in a range of community-based clinic settings. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses of medical chart data from 300 patients (201 with serious mental illness and 99 without serious mental illness) were used to examine indicators of the quality of care established by the Diabetes Quality Improvement Project. Recommended services assessed included glycosylated hemoglobin examination, eye and foot examinations, blood pressure check, and urine and lipid profiles. Self-report data were used to compare receipt of provider-delivered diabetes education and receipt of cues regarding self-management of diabetes for the two study groups. RESULTS: Evidence of lower quality of diabetes care was found for persons with serious mental illness as reflected by their receipt of fewer recommended services and less education about diabetes, compared with those without serious mental illness. Although participants with serious mental illness were less likely to receive cues from providers regarding the need for glucose self-monitoring, they were as likely as those without serious mental illness to receive cues regarding diet and medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants with serious mental illness received some services that are indicated in quality-of-care standards for diabetes, they were less likely to receive the full complement of recommended services and care support, suggesting that more effort may be required to provide optimal diabetes care to these vulnerable patients.