Should surgeons scrub with chlorhexidine or iodine prior to surgery?

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether chlorhexidine gluconate is equivalent or superior to the use of povidone-iodine during surgical hand scrub. A total of 593 papers were found using the reported searches of which eight represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. We conclude that whilst both chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine reduce bacterial count after scrubbing, the effect of chlorhexidine is both more profound and longer lasting. The studies found analysed the difference in reduction in colony forming units or bacterial count following surgical scrub in order to conclude that chlorhexidine was superior. Four studies went further to analyse cumulative and residual activity by testing for bacterial reduction after using a scrub solution for a number of days, an area in which chlorhexidine showed consistent advantages over povidone-iodine. These findings are given more credibility by the clinical finding of a recent meta-analysis of over 5000 patients in which chlorhexidine as an antiseptic skin preparation was associated with significantly reduced surgical site infection (SSI) in clean-contaminated surgery. Despite this, there is no evidence suggesting the use of chlorhexidine during hand scrub reduces SSI, which perhaps explains why guidelines from the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Association for Perioperative Practice do not recommend one specific antimicrobial over another for hand scrub.     

Contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts: the efficacy of 3 sterilization agents.

PURPOSE: A study was undertaken to determine the incidence of positive cultures resulting from an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) specimen dropped on the operating room floor and the efficacy of sterilizing the specimen by soaking in 1 of 3 antimicrobial solutions: an antibiotic solution of neomycin and polymyxin B, 10% providone-iodine solution, and standard chlorhexidine gluconate solution. TYPE OF STUDY: Randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty ACL specimens removed from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were used as the test group. The specimens were longitudinally sectioned into 4 equal pieces. The 4 pieces were dropped on the floor and left for a period of 15 seconds. Cultures were taken from each specimen after immersion in 1 of the 3 sterilization solutions for a period of 90 seconds. One of the 4 specimens was cultured without being exposed to any solution, thereby establishing these specimens as the control group. Cultures of a floor swab were taken at the same time and place that the ACL was dropped. RESULTS: The floor swab cultures were positive in 48 of the 50 specimens (96%). The ACL control group (untreated dropped grafts) had 29 of 50 specimens positive (58%). The grafts soaked in antibiotic solution had 3 of 50 specimens positive (6%). The grafts soaked in providone-iodine solution had 12 of 50 specimens positive (24%). The grafts soaked in chlorhexidine gluconate solution had 1 of 50 specimens positive (in broth only) (2%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that significant contamination occurs when dropping specimens on the floor, as 58% of the dropped grafts had positive cultures. Of the 3 sterilization techniques used, chlorhexidine gluconate seems to be the most efficient with only a single broth culture (2%) found to be positive. The antibiotic solution was second best (6%), although there is no statistically significant difference between these 2 groups. The 10% providone-iodine solution under these test conditions was the least effective of all the 3 sterilization agents with 24% cultures positive after immersion.     

Evidence-based protocol for infection control in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction

ABSTRACT: Immediate breast implant reconstruction has among the highest incidence of infections in plastic surgery.A literature search returned key articles that showed a significant decrease in surgical-site infections by performing nasal swab evaluation to treat methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus before surgery with mupirocin nasal ointment and 5 days of chlorhexidine scrub to the surgical area. Additional Level 1 data supported the use of chlorhexidine-alcohol over povidone-iodine solutions for skin preparation. Intraoperative data on breast pocket irrigation showed the benefits of povidone-iodine as well as a triple antibiotic solution. Nasal swabs from 120 patients showed no methicillin-resistant S. aureus but did identify 10 patients with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, 1 with streptococcus, and 3 with gram-negative rods, which changed perioperative antibiotic management. On the basis of the previously mentioned data, an evidence-based protocol for infection control was developed to potentially decrease infection rates. Further cost and efficacy data are warranted.     

Influence of preoperative showers on staphylococcal skin colonization: a comparative trial of antiseptic skin cleansers

We undertook a prospective randomized observer-blinded study comparing the ability of preoperative showers with chlorhexidine gluconate (Hibiclens), povidone-iodine (Betadine), and a lotion soap (Safe 'N Sure) to diminish the staphylococcal skin flora of patients. By block randomization, patients scheduled for an elective cardiac operation or coronary artery angioplasty were assigned to shower with one of the study skin cleansers either once (evening only) or twice (both evening and morning) before the procedure. Semiquantitative samples for culture were obtained from the subclavian and inguinal sites on the evening before the procedure (baseline culture) and again the next morning before the operation. The chlorhexidine skin cleanser consistently reduced staphylococcal colony counts at both the subclavian and inguinal sites before the procedure. This reduction was significant for patients showering both evening and morning (p less than 0.05). The use of the povidone-iodine skin cleanser inconsistently affected skin flora. Patients using lotion soap either experienced no change or had an increase in colony counts. Chlorhexidine is more effective than povidone-iodine in diminishing skin colonization with staphylococci in patients before operation. Repeated applications of chlorhexidine are superior to a single shower with this agent.     

A study of resistance to antiseptics of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in gastroenterological surgery

Highly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (H-MRSA, MIC greater than 100 micrograms/ml) was prevalent from 1986 in our institution. The failure of povidone-iodine to reduce the prevalence of MRSA led us to choose chlorhexidine-ethanol solution as an antiseptic, and then the isolation frequency of H-MRSA decreased significantly in 1988. When H-MRSA began to increase again recently, we studied the resistance to antiseptics of MRSA in order to investigate the cause of this re-increase. Common antiseptics were tested against 45 strains of H-MRSA and 22 strains of methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA, MIC less than 12.5 micrograms/ml). Dilute preparations (1:100) of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-ethanol solution were more effective on H-MRSA than the other antiseptics. Though there was no significant difference between H-MRSA and MSSA in their sensitivity to povidone-iodine, the killing of H-MRSA strains was more delayed than the killing of MSSA strains in chlorhexidine. Even after a 120-second exposure, 13.3% of H-MRSA strains were resistant to chlorhexidine (more than 1000 colonies were recovered). These highly chlorhexidine-resistant strains have been isolated since 1987 when we chose chlorhexidine-ethanol solution as the antiseptic in our institution. Therefore we suspect that the acquirement of resistance to antiseptics by H-MRSA caused the re-increase of this strain.     

Paint-only is equivalent to scrub-and-paint in preoperative preparation of abdominal surgery sites

BACKGROUND: Antiseptic preoperative skin site preparation is used to prepare the operative site before making a surgical incision. The goal of this preparation is a reduction in postoperative wound infection. The most straightforward technique necessary to achieve this goal remains controversial. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial was designed to prove equivalency for two commonly used techniques of surgical skin site preparation. Two hundred thirty-four patients undergoing nonlaparoscopic abdominal operations were consented for the trial. Exclusion criteria included presence of active infection at the time of operation, neutropenia, history of skin reaction to iodine, or anticipated insertion of prosthetic material at the time of operation. Patients were randomized to receive either a vigorous 5-minute scrub with povidone-iodine soap, followed by absorption with a sterile towel, and a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine or surgical site preparation with a povidone-iodine paint only. The primary end point of the study was wound infection rate at 30 days, defined as presence of clinical signs of infection requiring therapeutic intervention. RESULTS: Patients randomized to the scrub-and-paint arm (n = 115) and the paint-only arm (n = 119) matched at baseline with respect to age, comorbidity, wound classification, mean operative time, placement of drains, prophylactic antibiotic use, and surgical procedure (all p > 0.09). Wound infection occurred in 12 (10%) scrub-and-paint patients, and 12 (10%) paint-only patients. Based on our predefined equivalency parameters, we conclude equivalence of infection rates between the two preparations. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative preparation of the abdomen with a scrub with povidone-iodine soap followed by a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine can be abandoned in favor of a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine alone. This change will result in reductions in operative times and costs.     

Evaluation of antiseptic use in plastic and hand surgery

Despite the growing complexity of plastic surgical cases, antiseptics available for preoperative preparation do not always prove effective. In addition to the varied sites of plastic surgery, there is a likelihood of considerable contamination with microorganisms since surgical gloves are frequently punctured during surgical procedures. With an aim to find a solution to all of these problems, a study was conducted in 2 stages. First, antimicrobial effects on the normal flora of hands of 4 different surgical handwashing procedures, which consist of scrubbing with 7.5% povidone-iodine (PI) scrub by using the sponge/brush, 7.5% PI scrub alone, 0.5% benzalkonium chloride (BC) solution, and 0.1% BC solution, were compared. In the second stage, bacteriological samplings were obtained from fingertips of the operating team during the surgical procedure. At the end of the study, the following results were obtained: (1) scrubbing with 7.5% PI detergent by using a scrub sponge was significantly more effective than without using a scrub sponge (P < 0.05). (2) There was no statistically significant difference in scrubbing when povidone-iodine detergent and 0.5% benzalkonium chloride solution (P > 0.05) were compared. (3) At the end of the surgery lasting 1-5 hours, hands were found to be cleaner than previously washed hands for preoperative preparation, which was considered a consequence of the sustained effect of PI. (4) There was a statistically significant difference between the cultures taken from the gloves at the end of the operation and from the hands after the gloves were taken off (P < 0.01). At the end of the operation, the gloves themselves were found to be extremely dirtier than the hands inside them. As a conclusion, bacterial escape due to glove perforation occurs from outside of the glove to the inside, contrary to the generally accepted concept.     

Increased postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation after the treatment of experimental peritonitis with chlorhexidine

Background and aims Chlorhexidine is known as a substance that produces adhesions. However, in an experimental model of peritoneal injury, lavage with chlorhexidine and saline solutions produced a similar number of adhesions. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that chlorhexidine gluconate 0.05% solution used for the treatment of peritonitis increases formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions as compared to standard lavage with saline solution.Material and methods Forty Wistar rats were randomly allocated to gastric or faecal peritonitis groups. In each group rats were further randomly subdivided into saline or chlorhexidine peritoneal lavage groups. After 30 days the rats were killed and intraperitoneal adhesions were evaluated by adhesion score and grading.Results Adhesion scores were statistically significantly different between saline and chlorhexidine groups in both gastric and faecal peritonitis models. In the faecal peritonitis chlorhexidine group a 20% small bowel intussusception rate was observed, while there were no such complications in the other study groups. The conglomerate of organs formed by dense adhesions was present in 60% of cases when gastric peritonitis was lavaged by chlorhexidine and in only 10% when saline solution was used (P<0.05). Neither chlorhexidine nor saline solutions have caused such dense adhesions in faecal peritonitis.Conclusion Peritoneal lavage with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.05% solution in the treatment of experimental peritonitis results in increased adhesion formation.     

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site wound infection: A meta-analysis

A systematic evaluation was conducted to assess the efficacy of two disinfectants, chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine, as primary components in preventing surgical site infection (SSI). A comprehensive computerised search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine disinfection for the prevention of SSI from inception until July 2023. Two independent researchers completed literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Ultimately, 20 RCTs were included, which included 13 133 patients, with 6460 patients in the chlorhexidine group and 6673 patients in the povidone-iodine group. The meta-analysis results revealed that the incidence rate of surgical site wound infections [odds ratio (OR): 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58–0.78, p < 0.001)], superficial SSI rate (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46–0.75, p < 0.001) and deep SSI rate (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31–0.79, p = 0.003) were all lower in patients subjected to chlorhexidine disinfection compared to those patients receiving povidone-iodine disinfection. Existing evidence suggests that chlorhexidine is more effective than povidone-iodine at preventing SSI. However, owing to the potential quality limitations of the included studies, further validation through high-quality large-scale RCTs is warranted.     

Effects of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite on the microhardness of root canal dentin.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of endodontic irrigants on the microhardness of root canal dentin. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty extracted single-rooted human teeth were used. The crowns were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction. Each root was transversely sectioned into cervical, middle, and apical segments, resulting in 90 specimens. The 3 sections of each root were separately mounted in an individual silicon device with acrylic resin. The specimens were randomly divided into the following 3 groups (n = 30), according to the irrigant solution used: (1) group 1, control (saline solution); (2) group 2, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution; and (3) group 3, 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). After 15 minutes of irrigation, dentin microhardness was measured on each section at 500 microm and 1000 microm from the pulp-dentin interface with a Vickers diamond microhardness tester in Vickers hardness number (VHN). RESULTS: Data obtained were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Tukey test (5%). Specimens irrigated with 2% chlorhexidine (group 2) or 1% NaOCl (group 3) presented lower values of dentin microhardness, with significant difference in relation to the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: It could be concluded that chlorhexidine and NaOCl solutions significantly reduced the microhardness of root canal dentin at 500 microm and 1000 microm from the pulp-dentin interface.     

Residual bacterial contamination after surgical preparation of the foot or ankle with or without alcohol

To investigate the usefulness of a standard surgical preparation in prevention of surgical site contamination, 49 consecutive patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery were randomly assigned to standard preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate home scrubs and preoperative povidone-iodine or to standard preparation plus preoperative preparation with 70% alcohol. Results were available for all 49 patients. Cultures were positive for normal aerobic bacteria from the toes of nine of 26 patients (35%) receiving standard surgical preparation and from the toes of 13 of 23 patients (57%) receiving standard preparation plus alcohol (P = 0.12). No patient had a positive culture for anaerobic organisms or clinical evidence of infection or wound problems. Standard surgical preparation did not provide a completely sterile field, and the inclusion of alcohol added no benefit.     

Antisepsis for neuraxial procedures in Irish obstetric units and its possible impact on patient safety. A survey of national practice and associated complications

IntroductionThe Association of Anaesthetists’ guidelines recommend 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate for skin antisepsis before obstetric neuraxial procedures. In this national survey, we identified the practice of all 19 obstetric units in Ireland. A secondary aim was to investigate complications in units not following guidelines.MethodsA consultant obstetric anaesthetist in each unit was asked seven questions relating to the antiseptic solution used, its application, their awareness of relevant guidelines, the unit epidural and caesarean section rates, and cases of either chemical arachnoiditis or central nervous system (CNS) infection in the previous year.ResultsAll units responded (n=6 incomplete data) and consented verbally to anonymous data use. Thirteen (68%) used 0.5% chlorhexidine and three used 2% chlorhexidine swab-sticks (ChloraPrep™) exclusively; a fourth used mostly 2% chlorhexidine while two units used povidone iodine exclusively (11%). There were no cases of chemical arachnoiditis. One of three reported infective complications was attributed in part to the antiseptic used (povidone iodine) and practice was subsequently changed.ConclusionTwenty-one percent of obstetric anaesthesia units in Ireland, catering for one-third of the total deliveries, use the ChloraPrep™ swab-stick and consider it the safest form of application. Chlorhexidine gluconate has been implicated in devastating neurological injury, however there is no evidence that a less concentrated solution such as 0.5% is safer. We suggest a meticulous application technique should be considered more important for patient safety than the concentration of solution.     

A Rare Case of First Metatarsal Extrusion: Results of Treatment After 12 Months

We present the case of a 21-year-old male with 12 months’ follow-up after reimplantation of a completely extruded first metatarsal. The patient had a motorcycle accident involving his right foot and ankle, with multiple lesser metatarsal fractures, lateral malleolus fracture, and a total first metatarsal extrusion (without fracture) through a large dorso-medial forefoot wound. The extruded bone was recovered at the site of the motor vehicle accident and was transported to the hospital with the patient. Before the reimplantation surgery was undertaken, the first metatarsal was immersed in a chlorhexidine solution for 20 minutes and then washed in an antibiotic solution. Metatarsal fixation was performed with Kirschner wires; the lateral malleolus fracture was fixed with plate and screws. An external fixator was then applied. Throughout the 12-month follow-up period, there was no evidence of infection. At the present time, this case suggests that, after antiseptic cleansing and prompt surgery, extruded first metatarsal reimplantation is possible with a reasonable degree of clinical success.     

Is it possible to prevent bacterial adhesion onto ureteric stents?

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of bactericidal coatings or immersion in antibiotic solution reduces or prevents bacterial adhesion onto ureteric stents. Precut segments of full silicone, silver-coated and hydrogel-coated ureteric stents were incubated with two uropathogenic bacterial strains with and without previous immersion in antibiotic solution. Tobramycin, ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin solutions were used, as these antibiotics are commonly administered for the prophylaxis and treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI). Microbiological analysis showed that immersion of ureteric stents in ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin yielded a significant reduction of bacterial adhesion, whereas immersion in tobramycin did not. The surface material of the stents had no direct influence on bacterial adhesion. In this experimental study, neither the silver nor the hydrogel coat reduced bacterial adhesion onto ureteric stents whereas immersion in a suitable antibiotic solution significantly reduced and even prevented this phenomenon, probably due to the adhesion of the antibiotic onto the stent surface. Prevention of bacterial adhesion onto ureteric stents is essential to reduce the risk of UTI in connection with these devices.     

Meta-analysis of preoperative antiseptic bathing in the prevention of surgical site infection

BACKGROUND: Preoperative bathing with an antiseptic solution is widely used to prevent surgical site infection, but trial results are conflicting. METHODS: Trials were identified by searches of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane controlled trials register. Studies were eligible if they compared an antiseptic solution used in preoperative bathing with a non-antiseptic washing agent or with no bathing and if they reported data on surgical site infection. RESULTS: Six trials with a total of 10 007 patients were included; all of them used 4 per cent chlorhexidine gluconate. Three trials with 7691 patients compared chlorhexidine with placebo. Bathing with chlorhexidine did not reduce surgical site infection rate; the relative risk (RR) was 0.91. Including only trials of high quality, the RR was 0.95. Three trials with 1443 patients compared bar soap with chlorhexidine; no differences in the surgical site infection rates were detected, and the RR was 1.02. Two trials of 1092 patients compared bathing with chlorhexidine with no washing. The surgical site wound infection rate in the two groups was similar, and the RR was 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence does not support preoperative bathing with chlorhexidine as a means of reducing surgical site wound infection.     

In-use efficacy of a chlorhexidine in alcohol surgical rub: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Although full surgical scrubs are performed prior to each case on an operating list, optimum regimens for hand cleaning have yet to be determined, and in-use efficacy evaluations are very limited. METHODS: A crossover study was undertaken comparing a chlorhexidine in detergent/alcohol regimen with povidine-iodine detergent scrub, within an orthopaedic operating environment. Depending on the skin asepsis regimen used, five surgical team members scrubbed or rubbed prior to each case for a complete operating list. Bactericidal efficacy was measured using the 'glove-juice' technique before and after hand asepsis, and at the completion of each case. RESULTS: The chlorhexidine regimen caused substantial and sustained reductions in hand bacterial counts (>50-fold prior to case 1) during surgical cases. Application of alcoholic chlorhexidine prior to each subsequent case reduced bacterial counts to the same level as the original scrub. In contrast, the povidine-iodine scrub reduced counts <3-fold prior to the first case and <2-fold in subsequent cases. The chlorhexidine regimen also resulted in persistent bactericidal effects between cases, as counts prior to application of cases 2 and higher were significantly lower than prior to case 1 (>7-fold for case 2 vs case 1). CONCLUSIONS: The chlorhexidine regimen demonstrated excellent bactericidal efficacy throughout an operating list, and was superior to povidine-iodine scrubbing in all aspects. The alcoholic chlorhexidine regimen is simpler and should have wide surgical application.     

Oral chlorhexidine and microbial contamination during endoscopy: possible implications for transgastric surgery. A randomized, clinical trial

Background

One of the biggest concerns associated with transgastric surgery is contamination and risk of intra-abdominal infection with microbes introduced from the access route. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of oral decontamination with chlorhexidine on microbial contamination of the endoscope.

Methods

In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial the effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinse was evaluated. As a surrogate for the risk of intra-abdominal contamination during transgastric surgery, microbial contamination of the endoscope during upper endoscopy was examined. Patients referred to upper endoscopy were assessed for eligibility and randomized to either chlorhexidine or no mouth rinse. Culture samples were collected from gastric aspirates and endoscopes. The primary outcome measure was colony forming units (CFU) in the endoscope samples. Secondary outcome measures were species specific effect of chlorhexidine on micro-organisms with abscess forming capabilities and the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment on CFU.

Results

Chlorhexidine mouth rinse resulted in a significant reduction of CFU in the endoscope samples (p = 0.001). There was no species specific effect and micro-organisms with abscess forming capabilities were equally present. PPI treatment was associated with significantly higher CFU counts in both the gastric (p = 0.004) and endoscope samples (p = 0.049).

Conclusions

Chlorhexidine mouth rinse was effective in reducing microbial contamination of the endoscope, but micro-organisms with abscess forming capabilities were still present. PPI treatment significantly increased CFU and should be discontinued before transgastric surgery.     

Povidone-iodine surgical scrub solution prevents fogging of the scope’s lens during laparoscopic surgery

Easy cleaning of the scope’s lens in a syringe to prevent condensation during laparoscopic surgery is a simple and good way to use antifog solution more easily during laparoscopic surgery. This report explains a more inexpensive way to overcome condensation during laparoscopic surgery. Rubbing povidone-iodine surgical scrub solution on the scope’s lens prevents its fogging during laparoscopic surgery.     

Complete Eradication of Biofilm From Orthopedic Materials

Background

Interest exists in finding alternatives to current management strategies in periprosthetic joint infections, which typically include a 2-stage revision with placement of an antibiotic spacer and delayed placement of a new implant. We studied the efficacy of autoclaving, ultrasonication, and mechanical scrubbing for sterilization and biofilm eradication on infected cobalt-chrome discs.