Peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients

Diabetes mellitus is the fastest growing cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and has become the leading cause of such ESRD worldwide. In the United States, between 1984 and 1997, the proportion of new patients starting renal replacement therapies whose ESRD was caused by diabetes increased from 27% to 44.4%. Canada saw an increase from 16.5% in 1984 to 28.9% in 1997, and many European countries had similar increases. Among the modes of renal replacement, many clinicians have favored continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) for the treatment of diabetic ESRD for several reasons. Many studies have compared clinical outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing CAPD, and nondiabetic patients undergoing CAPD, or diabetic patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and those undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, only a small number of diabetic dialysis patients have been followed up for more than 5 years, largely because of the presence of several comorbid conditions at the start of dialysis and the coexistence of far-advanced target-organ damage at dialysis initiation and its progression during the course of dialysis. Diabetic patients undergoing PD and HD probably have similar survival, and those undergoing CAPD have lower survival and technique success rates than nondiabetic patients of comparable age. This article reviews the literature and our experience with diabetic patients undergoing PD and compares clinical outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing PD and HD.     

End-stage renal disease in the El-Minia Governorate, upper Egypt: an epidemiological study

We had earlier conducted two cross-sectional studies on the epidemiology of endstage renal disease (ESRD) in the El-Minia Governorate. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence, etiology and risk factors for ESRD in the El-Minia Governorate during the year 2006. Patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), numbering 1356, were recruited into this study. A standardized questionnaire was completed including demographics, family history, risk factors for ESRD, environmental exposure to toxins, work conditions, social history and causes of death. Only 800 (59%) of the 1356 patients agreed to participate in this study. Their mean age was 46 ± 13 years, median 43 (range 18-80). The male vs. female ratio was 65% vs. 35%. The etiology of ESRD was unknown in 27%, hypertension in 20%, chronic glomerulonephritis in 11%, obstructive uropathy in 12%, bilhaziasis in 3%, analgesic nephropathy in 5%, chronic pyelonephritis in 5%, diabetic nephropathy in 8% and others, e.g. lupus in 9%. The overall prevalence of ESRD was 308 per million population (pmp). The modalities of RRT used on the study patients included hemodialysis (HD) in 1315 (97%), peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 27 (2%) and renal transplantation in 14 patients (1%). The death rate was 190/1000. Our study suggests that the epidemiology of ESRD in the El-Minia Governorate is different from that in European countries and the US and thus, region-specific interventions must be developed to control the epidemic of ESRD in the world.     

Timely transfer of peritoneal dialysis patients to hemodialysis improves survival rates

AIMS: The two main renal replacement therapies (RRT)--hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)--have been considered to be antagonistic in most published studies on the clinical outcomes of dialysis patients. Recently, it has been suggested that the complementary use of both modalities as an integrated care (IC) strategy might improve the survival rate of end-stage renal disease patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the final clinical outcome of PD patients when they transfer to HD because of complications related to PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the following patients that started RRT during the last 10 years: 33 PD patients (IC group; age 55 +/- 15 years, mean +/- SD) who transferred to HD, 134 PD patients (PD group, age 64 +/- 11 years) who remained in PD, and 132 HD patients (HD group, age 48 +/- 16 years) who started and continued in HD. The main reasons for the transfer to HD were relapsed peritonitis and loss of ultrafiltration, while various comorbid risk factors were adjusted by Cox hazards regression model (age, presence of diabetes or/and cardiovascular disease, serum hemoglobin and albumin levels, as well as the modality per se). RESULTS: 3- and 5-year survival rates for the IC, PD and HD groups were 97% and 81%, 54% and 28%, and 92% and 83%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in IC patients than in PD patients (p < 0.00001) but, was not different from that in HD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the IC of dialysis patients undergoing RRT improves the survival of patients on PD if they are transferred to HD upon the appearance of PD related complications.     

Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease in an interregional perspective: Registries of Puglia and Basilicata, southern Italy

BACKGROUND: This report on the 1994-1998 Dialysis and Transplantation Registry (DTR) of Puglia and Basilicata provides the first epidemiological profile of ESRD in southern Italy. METHODS: Frequency measures of patients in renal replacement therapy (RRT) were computed for Puglia and Basilicata (inhabitants: 4,086,422 and 610,000 respectively). Hazard ratios (HR) of death in relation to sex, age, educational level, primary nephropathies, and modality of dialysis, were estimated by applying the Cox model to patients starting dialysis as first RRT in 1994-1998 in Puglia. RESULTS: The prevalence of treated ESRD in Puglia was 881 per million population (p.m.p.) (dialysis: 721 p.m.p.) in 1998, 713 p.m.p. (dialysis: 617 p.m.p.) in 1994. In Basilicata the prevalence of ESRD was 795 p.m.p. (dialysis: 669 p.m.p.) in 1998, 636 p.m.p. (dialysis: 575 p.m.p.) in 1994. Mean age at start of dialysis of incident cases of Puglia was 60 yr (median: 64 yr). Figures of diabetes, vascular diseases, and glomerulonephritis, were: 16%, 21%, 17%. Out of 2,152 incident patients on dialysis for at least one month, 293 started with peritoneal dialysis (PD). A 60-70% higher risk of death was observed for diabetic nephropathy and PD. In the Puglia/Basilicata DTR pooled analysis, lower educational level was associated with a 60% increased mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: The associations of PD and low education with the risk of death are very likely to be due to comorbid conditions, unavailable in these databases as in most regional and national DTR. By looking at variations of rates and outcomes among areas, potential improvements of local DTR for planning and research uses are discussed.     

Parathyroidectomy in patients on renal replacement therapy: an epidemiologic study

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a frequent complication of long-term dialysis treatment, and despite recent advances in medical therapy, surgical parathyroidectomy (PTx) is necessary in a considerable number of uremic patients. A prevalence of PTx of 22% was reported in Europe in 1988 in patients on dialysis from 10 to 15 yr, but no large-scale epidemiologic study has been published since then. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for PTx in patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Lombardy and to determine whether the incidence has changed over time. The study involved 14,180 patients included in the Lombardy Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation who received RRT for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) between 1983 and 1996. Cox-proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the risk factors of PTx, the explanatory covariates being age on admission to RRT, gender, underlying renal disease (nondiabetic or diabetic nephropathy), and dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis). The prevalence of PTx in the 7371 ERSD patients who were alive on December 31, 1996, was 5.5% and increased with the duration of RRT (9.2% after 10 to 15 yr, 20.8% after 16 to 20 yr). Similarly, the incidence of PTx increased from 3.3 per 1000 patient-years in patients who had been on RRT for <5 yr to 30 per 1000 patient-years in those receiving RRT for >10 yr. The Cox regression models showed that the relative risk for PTx was significantly higher in women and lower in elderly and diabetic patients. The relative risk for PTx (adjusted for gender, age, and nephropathy) was higher in the patients on peritoneal dialysis than in those on hemodialysis and decreased after transplantation. During the course of a follow-up of 7 yr, the incidence of PTx in patients who started RRT between 1990 and 1992 was no different from that observed in patients who started RRT between 1983 and 1985. In conclusion, the prevalence and incidence of PTx in patients receiving RRT in Lombardy is lower than that in Europe and Italy as a whole, as reported by the 1988 European Dialysis and Transplantation Association Registry; its frequency has not changed significantly during the past few years. The need for PTx decreases markedly after successful transplantation. The epidemiologic finding that the rate of PTx is greater in women, young patients, and individuals who do not have diabetes suggests the need for a more aggressive medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism particularly in such patients.     

Survival analysis of pediatric dialysis patients in Taiwan

Aim: The long‐term survival of Taiwanese children with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) has not been reported before. This study aimed to determine the long‐term survival, mortality hazards and causes of death in paediatric patients receiving dialysis. Methods: Paediatric patients (aged 19 years and younger) with incident ESRD who were reported to the Taiwan Renal Registry from 1995 to 2004 were included. A total of 319 haemodialysis (HD) and 156 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients formed the database. After stratification by dialysis modality, multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards model was constructed with age, sex and co‐morbidity as predictive variables. Results: The annual paediatric ESRD incidence rate was 8.12 per million of age‐related populations. The overall 1‐, 5‐, and 10‐year survival rates for PD patients were 98.1%, 88.0% and 68.4%, respectively, and were 96.9%, 87.3% and 78.5% for HD patients. The survival analysis showed no significant difference between HD and PD (P = 0.4878). Using ‘15–19 years’ as a reference group, the relative risk (RR) of the youngest group (0–4 years) was 6.60 (95% CI: 2.50–17.38) for HD, and 5.03 (95% CI: 1.23–20.67) for PD. The death rate was 24.66 per 1000 dialysis patient‐years. The three major causes of death were infection (23.4%), cardiovascular disease (13.0%) and cerebrovascular disease (10.4%). Hemorrhagic stroke (87.5%) was the main type of foetal cerebrovascular accident. Conclusion: We conclude that there was no significant difference of paediatric ESRD patient survival between HD and PD treatment in Taiwan. The older paediatric ESRD patients had better survival than younger patients.     

Mortality differences by dialysis modality among incident ESRD patients with and without coronary artery disease

It is unclear whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with hemodialysis (HD) confers a survival advantage in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This hypothesis was tested in a national cohort of 107,922 patients starting dialysis therapy between May 1, 1995, and July 31, 1997. Data on patient characteristics were obtained from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medical Evidence Form (CMS) and linked to mortality data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Patients were classified on the basis of CAD presence and followed until death or the end of 2 yr. Nonproportional Cox regression models estimated the relative risk (RR) of death for patients with and without CAD by dialysis modality using primarily the intent-to-treat but also the as-treated approach. Diabetic patients (DM) and nondiabetic patients (non-DM) were analyzed separately. Among DM, patients with CAD treated with PD had a 23% higher RR (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.34) compared with similar HD patients, whereas patients without CAD receiving PD had a 17% higher RR (CI, 1.08 to 1.26) compared with HD. Among non-DM, patients with CAD treated with PD had a 20% higher RR (CI. 1.10 to 1.32) compared with HD patients, whereas patients without CAD had similar survival on PD or HD (RR = 0.99; CI, 0.93 to 1.05). The mortality risk for new ESRD patients with CAD differed by treatment modality. In both DM and non-DM, patients with CAD treated with PD had significantly poorer survival compared with HD. Whether differences in solute clearance and/or cardiac risk profiles between PD and HD may explain these findings deserves further investigation.     

Prognostic analysis of end-stage renal disease patients without diabetes mellitus receiving hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Objective To compare the prognosis of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients without diabetes mellitus and identify related influencing factors. Methods Patients who started hemodialysis with an arteriovenous graft or fistula or PD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2013 to February 1, 2019 were included. They were followed up until May 1, 2019. The patients were divided into HD group and PD group according to the initial dialysis modality. Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain survival curves, the Cox regression model was used to evaluate influence factors for survival rates, and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to eliminate influence of the confounders in the groups. Results There were 371 patients with maintenance dialysis enrolled in this study, including 113 cases (30.5%) in HD group and 258 cases (69.5%) in PD group. At baseline, the scores of standard mean difference (SMD) in age, body mass index (BMI), combined with cerebrovascular disease, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), blood potassium, plasma albumin and hemoglobin between the two groups were greater than 0.1. The score of SMD decreased after IPTW, and the most data were less than 0.1, which meant that the balance had been reached between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the cumulative survival rates had no significant difference for all-cause death before using IPTW between the two groups (Log-rank χ2=0.094, P=0.759). After adjusting for confounders with IPTW, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the cumulative survival rates still had no significant difference for all-cause death between the two groups (Log-rank χ2=2.090, P=0.150). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that there was no significant difference between HD and PD on survival rates in ESRD patients without diabetes mellitus for all-cause death (PD/HD, HR=1.171, 95%CI 0.426-3.223, P=0.760). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that there was no significant difference between HD and PD on survival rates in ESRD patients without diabetes mellitus (PD/HD, HR=1.460, 95%CI 0.515-4.144, P=0.477), and high plasma albumin (HR=0.893, 95%CI 0.813-0.981, P=0.019) was an independent protective factor for survival in ESRD patients without diabetes mellitus. There was still no significant difference between HD and PD on survival rates in ESRD patients without diabetes mellitus after using IPTW (PD/HD, HR=1.842, 95%CI 0.514-6.604, P=0.348). Conclusion The difference of cumulative survival rates between HD and PD is not significant in ESRD patients without diabetes mellitus.     

Surgical Interventions for Renal Replacement Therapy from the View of Nephrologists

Summary BACKGROUND: The number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing worldwide at a rate of approximately 5 % per year. In Austria, 6049 patients were suffering from ESRD in the year 2001, an annual rate of 1093 patients. Higher age of patients and co-morbidities are forcing nephrologists to find the optimal renal replacement therapy (RRT) and access modality for the individual patient. METHODS: For patients with ESRD needing RRT, both nephrologist and surgeon should be consulted to ensure optimal management and treatment including vascular access surgery. Patients planned for peritoneal dialysis (PD) are treated with the cooperation of a visceral surgeon. A catheter is inserted into the pelvic area to enable solution exchange. In patients who are to undergo hemodialysis (HD), nephrologists have to decide whether the cardiac condition is suitable for surgical access creation such as fistula or graft. Otherwise alternative hemodialysis devices such as a central venous catheter (CVC), or subcutaneously implantable ports (Dialock^®), have to be discussed. Access function is routinely monitored during dialysis treatment, but still remains the weak component of extracorporeal RRT responsible for 40 % of hospitalization of HD patients. RESULTS: At the dialysis unit of the University Hospital of Graz, 107 patients were under RRT (70 HD and 37 PD), and 235 patients were hemodialyzed in private units in Graz in 2001. 81 ESRD patients were newly enrolled in the chronic HD program. 131 HD accesses were created in new HD patients and patients under treatment for chronic HD. 36 patients developed HD access complications and in these patients, 181 surgical and/or radiological interventions were performed. CONCLUSIONS: In 12 % of the HD patients in Graz, access problems occurred. These patients have a high frequency of surgical and radiological interventions. Access monitoring and measurement of recirculation may help to reduce the complication rate by 38 %. Before onset of RRT, patients need special management to ensure the best dialysis modality. ESRD patients who are suffering from cardiac diseases, diabetes mellitus, or bad peripheral vascular status need a multidisciplinary approach with nephrologists, cardiologists, surgeons and radiologists working together to find the optimal access for dialysis treatment.     

1996 Hong Kong Renal Registry Report

Summary: This report was based on the data from the Renal Registry of the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong and accounted for approximately 90-95% of all the patients on Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Hong Kong. Patients receiving treatment under the private sectors were not included in this report. the data were as of 31 December 1996. There were 15 renal units (2.4 unit per million population [pmp]) and four major renal transplant centres. the number of patients on RRT was 3337 (530 pmp), of which 56% (299 pmp) were on peritoneal dialysis (PD), 15% (79 pmp) on haemodialysis (HD) and 29% (152 pmp) with functioning kidney transplants (TX). the net increase in the number of patients on RRT was +12% from the previous year. the incidence of end stage renal failure was 640 (102 pmp). the median age of patients on RRT was 49 years, of which 27% were above the age of 61 years. For new patients who commenced on RRT during 1996, the median age was 56 years, of which 36% were above the age of 61 years. the causes of renal failure were glomerulonephritis 37%, unknown 30%, diabetes 13%, inherited and congenital 5%, infection/reflux 3%, hypertensive/renal vascular disease 3%, urolithiasis 2%, obstructive 1% and others 5%. For new patients entered into the programme during 1996, 25% were due to diabetic nephropathy. Ten per cent of all the patients on RRT were serologically positive for hepatitis B infection (PD 12%, HD 6%, TX 9%). 5% of all the patients on RRT were positive for hepatitis C infection (PD 3%, HD 12%, TX 7%). Seventy-nine per cent of all the patients on dialysis were on PD (1885 patients, 299 pmp), of which 96% were on CAPD. Thirty-eight per cent of the patients on CAPD were on straight-line systems, 35% on disconnecting systems and 20% on UV flash systems. Four-hundred and ninety-five patients (79 pmp) were on HD, of which 59% were on hospital based HD, 15% on satellite centre based HD, 10% on charitable centre based HD and 5% on home HD. Nine-hundred and fifty-seven patients (152 pmp) had a functioning kidney graft. 542 (57%) were transplanted in Hong Kong, of which 50% were cadaveric kidney transplantations. During 1996, 121 patients (19 pmp) received a kidney transplantation. Eighty-four transplants were performed in Hong Kong, of which 58 were with cadaveric kidneys and 26 with living related kidneys. the annual mortality rate for all RRT was 7.3% (10% for PD, 8% for HD and 1% with TX). the major causes of death were infection (28%), cardiovascular (26%) and cerebral vascular accident (9%). Outcome indicators were on patients entered into the RRT programme during 1995, thus allowing for 1 year of follow up. For CAPD as the first RRT, 1 year patient and technique survival (censored for death and non-technique failure) were 94% and 93%. For living related kidney transplants performed in Hong Kong, 1 year patient and graft survival (censored for death) were both 100%. For cadaveric kidney transplants, 1 year patient and graft survival were 98% and 96%     

Pediatric acute renal failure: outcome by modality and disease

Two hundred and twenty-six children who underwent renal replacement therapy (RRT) from 1992 to 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age, at the onset of RRT, was 74±11.7 months and weight was 25.3±9.7 kg. RRT therapies included hemofiltration (HF; n=106 children for an average of 8.7±2.3 days), hemodialysis (HD; n=61 children for an average of 9.5±1.7 days), and peritoneal dialysis (PD; n=59 children for an average of 9.6±2.1 days). Factors influencing patient survival included: (1) low blood pressure (BP) at onset of RRT (33% survival with low BP, vs 61% with normal BP, vs 100% with high BP; P<0.05), (2) use of pressors anytime during RRT (35% survival in those on pressors vs 89% survival in those not requiring pressors; P<0.01), (3) diagnosis (primary renal failure with a high likelihood of survival vs secondary renal failure; P<0.05), (4) RRT modality (40% survival with HF, vs 49% survival with PD, vs 81% survival with HD; P<0.01 HD vs PD or HF), and (5) pressor use was significantly higher in children on HF (74%) vs HD (33%) or PD (81%; P<0.05 HD vs HF or PD). In conclusion, pressor use has the greatest prediction of survival, rather than RRT modality. Patient survival in children with the need for RRT for ARF is similar to in adults and, as in adults, is best predicted by the underlying diagnosis and hemodynamic stability. Received: 15 February 2001 / Revised: 5 June 2001 / Accepted: 8 August 2001     

Survey on the current status of delivered informed consent for renal replacement therapy among patients with end-stage renal disease

We conducted a survey on the adequacy of delivered informed consent (IC) among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) regarding the information provided on renal replacement therapies (RRT): Hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and renal transplantation (RTx). A self-assessment style of questionnaire entitled "Informed consent for the selection of dialysis therapy modality" was prepared for evaluation, and the adequacy of IC was scored by 5 grades ranging from "excellent" to "bad". The questionnaire was sent to all the JSDT registered facilities (n=3484), and 480 centers replied (13.8%). Among these, 407 centers had patients introduced onto some form of RRT modality in the last 12 months. As to the adequacy of delivered IC for each modality, "excellent and good" status was reported as follows: 80.8% in HD, 49.8% in PD, and 32.5% in RTx, respectively. The major reason for "poor and bad" IC adequacy in PD and RTx, was "not available in the facility". By analyzing the facilities stratified by the clinical experiences of each modality in the past, poorly delivered IC for PD and RTx was revealed in centers lacking experience. Delivered information about RRT to ESRD patients may be biased in Japan. The findings of this study suggested that a lack of medical experience of the modality contributes to insufficient IC.     

Time trends in initiation and dose of dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines published by the NKF-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) in 1997 advocate an earlier start of dialysis in ESRD patients and a higher dialysis dose than usual. We studied the possible influence of the increasing emphasis on adequate dialysis on the management of ESRD patients in The Netherlands in 1993-2000. METHODS: The NECOSAD study on the adequacy of dialysis started in 1993. This prospective multi-centre study included ESRD patients older than 18 years who started HD or PD as the first RRT. We analysed the distribution of age, gender, primary renal disease and co-morbidity, the mean residual renal function and the mean dialysis-Kt/V(urea) at 3 months in 1569 consecutive patients by calendar year of initiation dialysis. RESULTS: Age, gender, primary renal disease and number of co-morbid conditions at the start of dialysis remained stable over time between 1993 and 2000. The mean renal Kt/V(urea) at 3 months increased from 0.5 in 1993 to 0.8 per week in 2000 (P<0.01). An upward trend remained after adjustment for patient characteristics and dialysis centre. The total Kt/V(urea) at 3 months increased from 3.3 in 1993 to 3.7 per week in 2000 in HD (P<0.01) and from 2.0 in 1993 to 2.3 per week in 1999 in PD patients (P<0.01). An upward trend in the dialysis-Kt/V(urea) was found after adjustment for renal Kt/V(urea) (HD: +0.3 per week, P=0.06; PD, +0.2 per week, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate a tendency towards earlier introduction of RRT and higher doses of dialysis in The Netherlands. Possible effects of this development on mortality, morbidity, quality of life and the balance between costs and benefits need further investigation.     

The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND: While the survival ramifications of dialysis modality selection are still debated, it seems reasonable to postulate that outcome comparisons are not the same for all patients at all times. Trends in available data indicate the relative risk of death with hemodialysis (HD) compared to peritoneal dialysis (PD) varies by time on dialysis and the presence of various risk factors. This study was undertaken to identify key patient characteristics for which the risk of death differs by dialysis modality. METHODS: Analyses utilized incidence data from 398,940 United States Medicare patients initiating dialysis between 1995 and 2000. Proportional hazards regression identified the presence of diabetes, age, and the presence of comorbidity as factors that significantly interact with treatment modality. Stratifying by these factors, proportional and nonproportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks of death [RR (HD:PD)]. RESULTS: Of the 398,940 patients studied, 11.6% used PD as initial therapy, 45% had diabetes mellitus (DM), 51% were 65 years or older, and 55% had at least one comorbidity. Among the 178,693 (45%) patients with no baseline comorbidity, adjusted mortality rates in nondiabetic (non-DM) patients were significantly higher on HD than on PD [age 18-44: RR (95% CI) = 1.24 (1.07, 1.44); age 45-64: RR = 1.13 (1.02, 1.25); age 65+: RR = 1.13 (1.05, 1.21)]. Among diabetic (DM) patients with no comorbidity, HD was associated with a higher risk of death among younger patients [age 18-44: RR = 1.22(1.05, 1.42)] and a lower risk of death among older patients [age 45-64: RR = 0.92 (0.85, 1.00); age 65+: RR = 0.86 (0.79, 0.93)]. Within the group of 220,247 (55%) patients with baseline comorbidity, adjusted mortality rates were not different between HD and PD among non-DM patients [age 18-44: RR = 1.19 (0.94, 1.50); age 45-64: RR = 1.01 (0.92, 1.11); age 65+: RR = 0.96 (0.91, 1.01)] and younger DM patients [age 18-44: RR = 1.10 (0.92, 1.32)], but were lower with HD among older DM patients with baseline comorbidity [age 45-64: RR = 0.82 (0.77, 0.87); age 65+: RR = 0.80 (0.76, 0.85)]. CONCLUSION: Valid mortality comparisons between HD and PD require patient stratification according to major risk factors known to interact with treatment modality. Survival differences between HD and PD are not constant, but vary substantially according to the underlying cause of ESRD, age, and level of baseline comorbidity. These results may help identify technical advances that will improve outcomes of patients on dialysis.     

Prognostic analysis of aged end-stage renal disease patients receiving hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Objective To compare the survival rates of elderly hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and identify their independent prognostic predictors. Methods Patients aging ＞60 years old who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014 were included. Propensity score method (PSM) was applied to adjust for selection bias. Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain survival curves and a Cox regression model was used to evaluate risk factors for mortality. Results 447 eligible patients with maintenance dialysis were identified, 236 with hemodialysis and 211 with peritoneal dialysis. 174 pairs of patients were matched, with the baseline data [age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the primary disease] between two groups showing no significant difference (P＞0.05). Cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events and infection were major causes of death in both groups and there was no significant difference in the causes of death between two groups (P＞0.05). The overall survival rates at 1 and 5 year were 93.6% and 63.4% respectively in HD group, 91.9% and 61.5% in PD group. The differences of total survival rates between HD and PD patients were not significant (P＞0.05). Cox regression analysis showed age(≥80 year) (P＜0.001, HR=1.058, 95%CI 1.028-1.088), diabetic nephropathy (P=0.001, HR=2.161, 95%CI 1.384-3.373), CCI≥5 (P=0.007, HR=1.935, 95%CI 1.201-3.117) were independent prognostic risk predictors in HD patients; age(≥80 year) (P=0.022, HR=1.043, 95%CI 1.006-1.081), serum albumin level ＜ 35 g/L (P=0.025, HR=1.776, 95%CI 1.075-2.934), and prealbumin (P=0.012, HR=0.968, 95%CI 0.944-0.993) were independent prognostic predictors in PD patients. Conclusions The differences of total survival rates between aged HD and PD patients are not significant. Age, diabetic nephropathy, CCI≥5 and age, serum albumin＜35 g/L, prealbumin＞30 g/L respectively influence the survival of elderly HD and PD patients.     

Long-term survival with peritoneal dialysis in ESRD due to diabetes.

Several clinical studies have evaluated the factors that affect survival rates and compared outcomes between CAPD and HD in diabetic patients. However, only a small number of diabetic PD patients have been followed for over 5 years, largely because of coexisting, far-advanced, target organ damage at the initiation of dialysis and its progression during the course of dialysis, the presence of various comorbid conditions at the start of dialysis and finally, the limitations of long-term PD. Among the various modes of renal replacement, many clinicians have favored continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) for the management of diabetic patients for several reasons. However, survival of diabetic patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) is probably similar, while diabetics on CAPD have a lower actuarial survival and technique success rates than non-diabetic patients of comparable age. This paper reviews the literature and our experience concerning the long-term survival on peritoneal dialysis of diabetic patients with ESRD.     

Renal replacement therapy options from an Indian perspective: dialysis versus transplantation

In developing countries such as India, the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is largely guided by economic considerations. In the absence of health insurance plans, fewer than 10% of all patients receive renal replacement therapy (RRT). Hemodialysis (HD) is mainly a short-term measure to support ESRD patients prior to transplant. Infections are common in dialysis patients. The majority of patients starting HD die or are forced to abandon treatment because of cost constraints within the first 3 months. The cost of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is two times higher than that of HD, fewer than 2% of patients are started on PD. Among the three RRT options available, renal transplant is the preferred mode, as it is most cost-effective and provides a better quality of life. But due to financial constraints and nonavailability of organs, only about 5% of ESRD patients undergo transplant surgery. Though the removal of organs from brain-dead patients has been legalized, the concept of donation of organs from deceased donors has not received adequate social sanction. Only 2% of all transplants are performed from deceased donors. Due to limited access to RRT, the ideal approach should be to reduce the incidence of ESRD and attempt preventive measures. Preemptive transplant, reducing the duration of dialysis prior to transplant, use of immunosuppression for only up to 1 year, and availability of more deceased donor organs may be helpful to make RRT options within the reach of the common man.     

Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Recent registry studies comparing mortality between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients show conflicting results. The purpose of this study is to determine whether previously published results showing higher mortality for patients treated with PD versus HD in the United States continue to hold true over the period 1987-1993. National mortality rates for PD and HD were extracted from the U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS) annual reports for the cohort periods: 1987-1989, 1988-1990, 1989-1991, 1990-1992, and 1991-1993. Using Poisson regression, death rates per 100 patient years were compared between PD and HD for each cohort period controlling for age, gender, race, and cause of end-stage renal disease (diabetes versus nondiabetes). When incident patients and patients with a prior transplant were included in the analysis, starting with the 1989-1991 cohort, we found little or no difference in the relative risk (RR PD:HD) of death between PD and HD (1987-1989: RR = 1.17, P < 0.001; 1988-1990: RR = 1.12, P < 0.001; 1989-1991: RR = 1.06, P = NS; 1990-1992: RR = 1.06, P = NS; 1991-1993: RR = 1.08, P = 0.043). After a test for goodness-of-fit, separate analyses for diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients were done to examine unexplained variation in death rates. For nondiabetic patients, there was less than a 1% difference in the adjusted 1-yr survival between PD and HD from 1989-1993 (1989-1991: RR = 1.05, P = NS; 1990-1992: RR = 1.04, P = NS; 1991-1993: RR = 1.07, P < 0.01). Among diabetic patients, the PD:HD death rate ratio varied significantly according to gender and age. For the average male diabetic patient, there was little or no difference in risk between PD and HD from 1989-1993 (1989-1991: RR = 1.02, P = NS; 1990-1992: RR = 1.05, P = NS; 1991-1993: RR = 1.08, P < 0.01). For diabetic patients under the age of 50, those treated with PD had a significantly lower risk of death than those treated with HD (1989-1993: 0.84 < or = RR < or = 0.89, P < 0.005). Over the same period, female diabetic patients treated with PD had a higher risk, on average, than HD (1.18 < or = RR < or = 1.19, P < 0.001) as did diabetic patients over the age 50 (1.28 < or = RR < or = 1.30, P < 0.001). Unlike previously published results that were restricted to prevalent-only patients, this national study of both prevalent and incident patients found little or no difference in overall mortality between PD and HD. The recent trends in mortality likely reflect the inclusion of incident patients, but they may also reflect changes in case-mix differences and/or improved PD practice. Additional incident-based studies that allow for additional case-mix adjustments are needed to better compare outcomes between HD and PD.     

Comparison and survival of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the elderly

Comparisons of clinical outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients have been marked by inconsistent results depending on the population studied and the methods used. In order to address this limitation of previous U.S. studies and to more specifically evaluate the higher-risk elderly population, we undertook a study of Medicare patients > or =67 years of age and assessed the comorbidity before they entered end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treatment. We then evaluated their survival outcomes at 6 month intervals in the follow-up period. In order to adequately assess the comorbidity we employed the Charlson comorbidity index and applied it to the comorbidity of the ESRD population up to 2 years before ESRD to characterize conditions from the start of ESRD treatment. We also counted inpatient hospital days in the 2 years prior to initiation of ESRD therapy as a marker of severity of disease. These two determinants of comorbidity were used to adjust the analysis along with other demographic and laboratory data. In the diabetic population, HD patients are shown to have a decreased risk of death, with the decrease ranging from 8% [relative risk (RR) (HD:PD) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.90] at month 6 to 54% [RR (HD:PD) 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.70] at month 48. In the nondiabetic population, HD patients are shown to have a 17% [RR (HD:PD) 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28] increased risk of death in the first 6 months, and a decreased risk of death from months 6 to 48, a decrease ranging from 17% to 34%. Relative risks were significantly different from 1.0 at all intervals. These overall findings suggest that in the elderly population in the United States treated with PD had outcomes that were significantly worse than their HD patient counterparts, even after adjusting basic patient demographics, the comorbidity index, severity of disease with hospital days, demographics, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the time of start of dialysis.     

Survival and transplantation outcomes of children less than 2 years of age with end-stage renal disease

Background

Young children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) have traditionally experienced high rates of morbidity and mortality; however, detailed long-term follow-up data is limited.

Methods

Using a population-based retrospective cohort with data from a national organ failure registry and administrative data from Canada’s universal health care system, we analysed the outcomes of 87 children starting RRT (before age 2 years) and followed them until death or date of last contact [median follow-up 4.7 years, interquartile range (IQR) 1.4–9.8). We assessed secular trends in survival and the influence of: (1) age at start of RRT and (2) etiology of ESRD with survival and time to transplantation.

Results

Patients were mostly male (69.0 %) with ESRD predominantly due to renal malformations (54.0 %). Peritoneal dialysis was the most common initial RRT (83.9 %). Fifty-seven (65.5 %) children received a renal transplant (median age at first transplant: 2.7 years, IQR 2.0–3.3). During 490 patient-years of follow-up, there were 23 (26.4 %) deaths, of which 22 occurred in patients who had not received a transplant. Mortality was greater for patients commencing dialysis between 1992 and 1999 and among the youngest children starting RRT (0–3 months). Children with ESRD secondary to renal malformations had better survival than those with ESRD due to other causes. Among the transplanted patients, all but one survived to the end of the observation period.

Conclusion

Children who start RRT before 3 months of age have a high risk of mortality. Among our paediatric patient cohort, mortality rates were much lower among children who had received a renal transplant.