Use of piretanide, a new loop diuretic, in cirrhosis with ascites: relationship between the diuretic response and the plasma aldosterone level.

Twenty patients with cirrhosis and ascites but no renal failure were given piretanide, a new loop diuretic, in order to investigate its efficacy and to relate the diuretic response with the pretreatment plasma aldosterone concentration. Eleven patients responded to piretanide 12 mg/day (equivalent in potency to 80 mg furosemide); there was no response in nine patients. Both groups were similar with regard to liver function, plasma urea, serum creatinine, plasma electrolytes, urine volume, and urine potassium concentration. The basal urinary sodium excretion was significantly higher in those patients who responded (23.6 +/- 5.7 mmol/day vs. 4.3 +/- 1.42 mmol/day; P < 0.01) (M +/- SE). Plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) were normal or only slightly increased in patients who responded to piretanide (PRA = 1.22 +/- 0.20 ng/ml/h; PAC = 12.25 +/- 2.20 ng/100 ml) and very high in patients who did not respond (PRA = 8.71 +/- 1.18 ng/ml/h; PAC = 84.6 +/- 16.2 ng/100 ml) (P < 0.001). Patients unresponsive to piretanide 12 mg/day also failed to respond when the dose was increased to 24 mg/day. However, the addition of spironolactone, 150 mg/day, to piretanide was followed in these patients by a marked increase in diuresis and natriuresis. These results strongly suggest that the pre-treatment level of aldosterone is an important factor influencing the response to loop diuretics in patients with non-azotaemic cirrhosis and ascites.     

Blunted natriuretic response and low blood pressure after atrial natriuretic factor in early cirrhosis

We compared the natriuretic response to a standard dose of atrial natriuretic factor in nine patients with early cirrhosis (no ascites or edema) with the response in normal subjects displaying a range of baseline sodium excretions due to different sodium intakes (20 mmoles per day, n = 9; 100 mmoles per day, n = 9, and 200 mmoles per day, n = 9). In these normal subjects, sodium output rose, in the same order, from 49 +/- 12 to 177 +/- 26, from 116 +/- 21 to 365 +/- 106 and from 228 +/- 29 to 901 +/- 85 mumoles per min in the first 20 min after 100 micrograms atrial natriuretic factor (human atrial natriuretic factor 99-126). Thus, irrespective of basal excretion, natriuresis rose by at least 2-fold. In the cirrhotic patients, natriuresis rose from 173 +/- 42 to 305 +/- 77 mumoles per min, that is by hardly 1-fold, significantly less than in the normal subjects (p less than 0.01). Renal function studies indicated that atrial natriuretic factor caused less rise in glomerular filtration rate and in fractional sodium excretion. Atrial natriuretic factor induced a fall in blood pressure only in the cirrhotic group, from 130 +/- 4/81 +/- 2 to 108 +/- 4/68 +/- 3 mmHg (p less than 0.001). Plasma atrial natriuretic factor was not low in the cirrhotic patients. Although these data are compatible with a primary disturbance of sodium excretion in early cirrhosis without ascites, such an explanation is complicated by the concomitant drop in blood pressure after atrial natriuretic factor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Increased natriuretic efficiency of furosemide in rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis

The authors examined the natriuretic efficiency of furosemide in rats with cirrhosis induced by carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4)). Rats were treated for 17 weeks with intraperitoneal injections of CCl(4) in groundnut oil twice a week throughout the study. Control rats were treated with vehicle (groundnut oil). Studies in metabolic cages showed that sodium retention was present from week 14. Renal clearance experiments were performed in chronically, instrumented conscious rats at the end of week 14 and at the termination of the study (end week 16) when ascites and hyponatremia were present. After 14 weeks, cirrhotic rats had sodium retention along with increased renal plasma flow, normal GFR, normal renal lithium handling, and a significantly increased diuretic (+41% vs. control) and natriuretic (+56% vs. control) response to a test dose furosemide (7.5 mg/kg b.w., intravenously). The natriuretic efficiency of furosemide, i.e., the natriuresis expressed relative to the furosemide excretion rate (triangle upU(Na)V/U(FUR)V) was increased by 51% versus control. After 17 weeks, ascites and hyponatremia had developed, and significant decreases in renal plasma flow (-33%), GFR (-30%), and fractional lithium excretion (-44%) were observed. At this stage urinary recovery of furosemide was significantly decreased and the diuretic (-27% vs. Control) and natriuretic (-38% vs. control) responses to furosemide were significantly impaired. However, the increased natriuretic efficiency of furosemide was still present (+34% vs. control). Together these results suggest that increased sodium reabsorption in the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop is involved in the renal sodium retention in cirrhosis in rats that eventually results in decompensation with the formation of ascites.     

Renal prostacyclin influences renal function in non-azotemic cirrhotic patients treated with furosemide

The influence of prostaglandins on renal function changes induced by furosemide was analyzed in 21 non-azotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. Patients were studied in two periods of 120 min immediately before and after furosemide infusion (20 mg, ev). Furosemide caused an increase in creatinine clearance in 15 patients (group A: 99 +/- 7 vs. 129 +/- 5 ml/min; mean +/- S.E.) and a reduction in the remaining six (group B: 102 +/- 13 vs. 71 +/- 9 ml/min). Parallel changes were observed in the urinary excretion of 6-Keto-prostaglandin-F1 alpha (metabolite of renal prostacyclin) which augmented after furosemide in 14 of the 15 patients from group A (478 +/- 107 vs. 1034 +/- 159 pg/min, p less than 0.001) and decreased in all patients from group B (1032 +/- 240 vs. 548 +/- 136 pg/min, p less than 0.05). In contrast, the urinary excretion of prostaglandin E2 was stimulated by furosemide in all patients (group A, 92 +/- 19 vs. 448 +/- 60 pg/min, p less than 0.001; and group B, 209 +/- 63 vs. 361 +/- 25 pg/min, p less than 0.05). In all of the patients furosemide-induced changes (post- minus pre-furosemide values) in creatinine clearance were closely correlated in a direct and linear fashion with those in 6-Keto-prostaglandin-F1 alpha (r = 0.74; p less than 0.001). These changes were associated with a higher furosemide-induced natriuresis in group A than in group B (641 +/- 68 vs. 302 +/- 46 mumol/min, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Selective dopamine DA1 stimulation with fenoldopam in cirrhotic patients with ascites: a systemic, splanchnic and renal hemodynamic study.

We studied the effects of fenoldopam, a selective dopamine DA1 agonist on systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics, renal blood flow and sodium excretion in 12 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and ascites. Hepatic, azygos and renal veins were catheterized before and after intravenous administration of fenoldopam, 0.05 micrograms/kg/min for 1 hr and increased to 0.1 micrograms/kg/min for another hour. Mean arterial pressure progressively decreased (from 83 +/- 7 to a minimum of 77 +/- 8 mm Hg 100 min after starting the infusion) but returned to baseline level at 120 min. Plasma norepinephrine and renin activity increased (respectively from 567 +/- 297 to 919 +/- 375 pg/ml, p less than 0.05, and from 17 +/- 14 to 23 +/- 15 ng/ml/hr, p less than 0.05). Renal blood flow, urine output or sodium excretion did not change. Sodium output decreased at 1 hr from 6.9 mumol/min to 4.0 mumol/min, p less than 0.05. Both hepatic venous pressure gradient and azygos blood flow significantly increased by 21%. We conclude that the acute administration of fenoldopam did not improve renal hemodynamics or function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. In addition, dopamine DA1 agonism caused further increases in norepinephrine concentration and plasma renin activity. Portal pressure also increased, probably because of an increase in mesenteric blood flow. These results question the renal benefit and raise concern about the use of dopamine agonists in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.     

Effects of captopril on renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites

Blockade of angiotensin-converting enzyme has been variously reported to increase or to decrease sodium excretion in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. We administered captopril (50-150 mg) to 11 patients with cirrhosis and ascites to determine the effects on blood pressure, renal blood flow and sodium excretion. Plasma renin activity increased and mean blood pressure fell (by 14 mm Hg). Para-aminohippurate clearances increased from 321 +/- 53 to 559 +/- 83 ml/min (P less than 0.005), but inulin clearances were minimally altered (73 +/- 8 to 76 +/- 7 ml/min), suggesting preferential dilation of glomerular efferent arterioles. Despite unchanged glomerular delivery of sodium, urinary sodium excretion fell in all subjects (from 2.70 +/- 1.00 to 0.48 +/- 0.21 mEq/h), urinary volume was reduced (377 +/- 55 to 182 +/- 42 ml/h, P less than 0.005), and the natriuretic effect of furosemide was blunted. The antinatriuretic effect of captopril may be mediated by reduced angiotensin II-mediated sodium excretion, by decreased prostaglandin production, and/or by indirect effects of reduced blood pressure. Captopril impairs rather than promotes sodium excretion.     

Furosemide-induced natriuresis as a test to identify cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites

The diagnosis of refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients carries a poor prognosis and liver transplantation should always be considered in this situation. Identification of patients who will not respond to diuretic therapy usually requires several weeks of observation during which a trial of diuretics is instituted using stepwise increases in dosage in order to classify ascites as refractory. In the present study we evaluated the effect of a single dose of 80 mg intravenous furosemide on urinary sodium excretion over 8 hours in cirrhotic patients with ascites responsive to diuretic treatment (group 1; n = 14) and patients with refractory ascites (group 2; n = 15). The test was performed after 3 days without diuretics and patients were on a 80 mEq sodium/day diet. Refractory ascites was defined by the absence of response after 3 months of high doses of diuretics (spironolactone 200 mg/d + furosemide 80 mg/d + metolazone 2.5 mg/d) and the need for repeated paracentesis. The two groups had similar degrees of liver and renal dysfunction as assessed by the Pugh score and creatinine clearance. The effects of furosemide on 8-hour natriuresis was much higher in patients with responsive ascites as compared with patients with refractory ascites (125 +/- 46 vs. 30 +/- 16 mEq; mean +/- SD; P <.0001). A natriuresis lower than 50 mEq/8 hours was observed in all group-2 patients as compared with none from group 1. The present study shows that patients with refractory ascites can be identified quickly and accurately by using this simple furosemide-induced natriuresis test, which could be very useful to select patients for liver transplantation.     

Altered furosemide pharmacokinetics in chronic alcoholic liver disease with ascites contributes to diuretic resistance

Some patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease and ascites have an impaired natriuretic response to furosemide. To elucidate the mechanism of this diuretic resistance, we measured para-aminohippurate and inulin clearances and urinary excretion of electrolytes, prostaglandin E2, and furosemide after intravenous administration of 80 mg of furosemide in 26 patients. The natriuretic response was variable (3.3-172 mEq/h) and was unrelated to basal sodium excretion, renal clearances, or urinary prostaglandin E2. Natriuresis correlated negatively with plasma aldosterone (r = -0.54, p less than 0.01), and strongly with urinary furosemide (range 5.5-76 mg/h, r = 0.71, p less than 0.001). As urinary furosemide excretion reflects the amount of furosemide reaching the active site on the luminal side of the tubule, the data demonstrate markedly reduced amounts of furosemide at its primary site of action in patients with diuretic resistance. Plasma furosemide was higher in patients with reduced furosemide excretion and impaired natriuresis, suggesting that the defect was an impairment of furosemide transport into the tubule. Thus, a major factor in diuretic resistance is altered furosemide pharmacokinetics.     

Renal kallikrein excretion in cirrhotics with ascites: relationship to renal hemodynamics

To investigate if the renal kallikrein-kinin system may be involved in the homeostasis of renal perfusion in cirrhosis, urinary kallikrein activity was measured in 11 normal subjects, 31 cirrhotics with ascites and preserved renal plasma flow (548.2 +/- 32.2 ml per min) and glomerular filtration rate (85.8 +/- 3.4 ml per min), and 18 cirrhotics with functional renal failure (renal plasma flow: 229.9 +/- 23.4 ml per min; glomerular filtration rate: 34.9 +/- 3.3 ml per min). Plasma renin activity, plasma norepinephrine concentration and the urinary excretion of prostaglandin E2 were also measured in these subjects. Cirrhotics without renal failure showed a significantly higher renin (4.9 +/- 1.1 ng per ml per hr), norepinephrine (458.2 +/- 50.4 pg per ml), urinary kallikrein (15.4 +/- 1.8 pkat per min) and urinary prostaglandin E2 (0.52 +/- 0.08 ng per min) than did normal subjects (1.08 +/- 0.1 ng per ml per hr, 218.1 +/- 18.2 pg per ml; 8.4 +/- 1.4 pkat per min and 0.24 +/- 0.02 ng per min, respectively). Cirrhotics with renal failure showed a significantly higher renin (16.1 +/- 3.4 ng per ml per hr) and norepinephrine (739.4 +/- 79.2 pg per ml), and a significantly lower urinary kallikrein (5.2 +/- 0.6 pkat per min) and urinary prostaglandin E2 (0.15 +/- 0.02 ng per min) than did normal subjects and cirrhotics without renal failure. Glomerular filtration rate correlated (p less than 0.001) with urinary kallikrein (r = 0.53), urinary prostaglandin E2 (r = 0.55), plasma renin (r = -0.41) and norepinephrine (r = -0.44).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Temporal relationship between hyperaldosteronism, sodium retention and ascites formation in rats with experimental cirrhosis

To investigate the role of aldosterone in sodium retention and ascites in cirrhosis, the urinary sodium excretion, sodium balance and urinary excretion of aldosterone-18-glucuronide (UAldV) were serially measured in 11 rats undergoing cirrhosis induction with carbon tetrachloride (CT) and phenobarbital (CT rats) and in 10 control rats which received phenobarbital. All CT rats developed ascites, seven within the ninth week after starting the program and four within the 10th week. One week before the onset of ascites, CT rats and control rats were different with respect to sodium excretion (1.41 +/- 0.15 vs. 1.82 +/- 0.1 mEq per day), sodium balance (0.57 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.20 +/- 0.09 mEq per day) and UAldV (67.8 +/- 9.5 vs. 25.7 +/- 1.7 ng per day). These differences were more pronounced within the week in which ascites was detected in CT rats. Before these 2 weeks, both groups did not differ with respect to these parameters. In the 132 urine samples obtained in CT rats, there was a correlation between sodium excretion and UAldV (r = -0.53; p less than 0.001). Twenty-one additional CT rats were divided into two groups. Eleven animals were given spironolactone (20 mg per day s.c. in olive oil) from the 6th week, and 10 only received olive oil. Thirteen weeks after starting the program, all rats not treated with spironolactone had sodium retention and ascites (in five rats, ascites appeared within the ninth week and in five within the tenth week); this occurred in only one animal treated with spironolactone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of BG9719 (CVT-124), an A1-adenosine receptor antagonist, and furosemide on glomerular filtration rate and natriuresis in patients with congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of furosemide and the selective A1 adenosine receptor BG9719 on renal function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that adenosine may affect renal function by various mechanisms, but the effects of blockade of this system in humans is unknown. In addition, the effects of a therapeutic dose of furosemide on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) in heart failure patients are controversial. METHODS: On different days, 12 patients received placebo, BG9719 and furosemide. Glomerular filtration rate, RPF and sodium and water excretion were assessed immediately following drug administration. RESULTS: Glomerular filtration rate was 84 +/- 23 ml/min/1.73m2 after receiving placebo, 82 +/- 24 following BG9719 administration and a decreased (p < 0.005) 63 +/- 18 following furosemide. Renal plasma flow was unchanged at 293 +/- 124 ml/min/1.73m2 on placebo, 334 +/- 155 after receiving BG9719 and 374 +/- 231 after receiving furosemide. Sodium excretion increased from 8 +/- 8 mEq following placebo administration to 37 +/- 26 mEq following BG9719 administration. In the six patients in whom it was measured, sodium excretion was 104 +/- 78 mEq following furosemide administration. CONCLUSIONS: Natriuresis is effectively induced by both furosemide and the adenosine A1 antagonist BG9719 in patients with CHF. Doses of the two drugs used in this study did not cause equivalent sodium and water excretion but only furosemide decreased GFR. These data suggest that adenosine is an important determinant of renal function in patients with heart failure.     

A pathophysiological interpretation of unresponsiveness to spironolactone in a stepped-care approach to the diuretic treatment of ascites in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients

It has been hypothesized that the magnitude of proximal sodium reabsorption affects the response to aldosterone antagonists in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. To verify this hypothesis, we evaluated intrarenal sodium handling by lithium clearance in 51 nonazotemic ascitic cirrhotic patients and in 23 controls who were maintained on the same low-sodium diet (80 mmol/day). Seven of 51 cirrhotic patients underwent spontaneous diuresis, whereas 44 required diuretic treatment. Treatment was started with spironolactone at a dose of 150 mg once daily. The dose was increased to 300 mg and then to 500 mg once daily if no response ensued. Cirrhotic patients who did not experience ascites mobilization with 500 mg spironolactone were then treated with a combined diuretic regimen that included spironolactone at a fixed dose (500 mg once daily) and furosemide at an initial dose of 50 mg once daily. The dose was increased to 100, 150 and 200 mg once daily if no response was noticed. Response to diuretic treatment was defined as body weight loss greater than 700 gm every 3 days until ascites became clinically undetectable. Nonresponders (43%) to spironolactone showed lower sodium fractional excretion (0.34% +/- 0.28% vs. 0.80% +/- 0.50%; p less than 0.001) because of a lower fractional sodium delivery to the distal tubule (18.2% +/- 5.8% vs. 23.4% +/- 7.2%; p less than 0.025) than responders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Immediate effects of furosemide on renal hemodynamics in chronic liver disease with ascites

Furosemide occasionally causes azotemia in patients with ascites, independently of induced volume depletion. To define this effect, we measured renal clearances in patients with chronic liver disease and ascites and in nonascitic controls. Furosemide (80 mg i.v.) transiently increased p-aminohippurate clearance in controls (from 693 +/- 67 to 928 +/- 93 ml/min) and in 11 patients with ascites (from 418 +/- 81 to 526 +/- 80 ml/min). In contrast, in 13 patients with ascites, p-aminohippurate clearance fell by 34% (from 545 +/- 51 to 360 +/- 24 ml/min) within 20 min and by 41% within 60 min, and inulin clearance fell by 19% at 20 min and by 30% at 60 min. The renal effects lasted approximately 4 h. The renal response could not be predicted by renin activity, urinary prostaglandin excretion, urinary sodium, or clinical characteristics. In all 14 patients who received oral furosemide, p-aminohippurate clearance fell within 90 min (by 24%) and remained suppressed for at least 4 h. These immediate effects of furosemide on renal perfusion may contribute to azotemia in some patients with ascites.     

Bed-rest-induced hypernatriuresis in cirrhotic patients without ascites: does it contribute to maintain 'compensation'?

Renal function, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone concentration and urine excretion of free norepinephrine were evaluated in 13 cirrhotics without previous or ongoing ascites and in 13 healthy subjects, after 6 days of controlled electrolyte intake (40 mmol of Na and 70 mmol of K per day) and during 24 h of recumbency. Plasma concentrations of the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) were also measured in 8 patients and 8 controls. Despite a low-normal filtered load of sodium (14.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 17.1 +/- 1.2 mmol/min), cirrhotic patients showed supernormal natriuresis (141.5 +/- 14.1 vs. 78.8 +/- 8.6 mmol/day; p < 0.001). Whereas the fractional excretion of sodium in these patients was twice that of controls (0.70 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.36 +/- 0.04%; p < 0.001), potassium excretion (42.5 +/- 2.7 vs. 43.1 +/- 2.7 mmol/day) and urine volume (1270 +/- 98 vs. 1452 +/- 148 ml/day) did not differ. In cirrhotics, plasma renin activity was reduced (0.50 +/- 0.12 vs. 1.39 +/- 0.33 ng/ml/h; p < 0.02), and plasma aldosterone concentration tended to be lower (66 +/- 10 vs. 86 +/- 9 pg/ml; p = 0.09), while urine norepinephrine excretion did not significantly differ from controls (961 +/- 120 vs. 782 +/- 43 ng/h). ANP was higher in patients than in controls (92 +/- 17 vs. 48 +/- 9 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Natriuresis was directly correlated with ANP (r = 0.69, p < 0.005) and ANP/plasma aldosterone ratio (r = 0.63; p < 0.01) in patients and healthy subjects taken together.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of celecoxib and naproxen on renal function in nonazotemic patients with cirrhosis and ascites

Nonselective inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs frequently induces renal failure in decompensated cirrhosis. Studies in experimental cirrhosis suggest that selective inhibitors of the inducible isoform COX-2 do not adversely affect renal function. However, very limited information is available on the effects of these compounds on renal function in human cirrhosis. This investigation consists of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial aimed at comparing the effects of the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (200 mg every 12 hours for a total of 5 doses) on platelet and renal function and the renal response to furosemide (40 mg intravenously) with those of naproxen (500 mg every 12 hours for a total of 5 doses) and placebo in 28 patients with cirrhosis and ascites. A significant reduction (P < .05) in glomerular filtration rate (113 +/- 27 to 84 +/- 22 mL/min), renal plasma flow (592 +/- 158 to 429 +/- 106 mL/min) and urinary prostaglandin E(2) excretion (3430 +/- 430 to 2068 +/- 549 pg/min) and suppression of the diuretic (urine volume: 561 +/- 128 to 414 +/- 107 mL/h) and natriuretic (urine sodium: 53 +/- 13 to 34 +/- 10 mEq/h) responses to furosemide were observed in the group of patients treated with naproxen but not in the other two groups. Naproxen, but not celecoxib or placebo, significantly inhibited platelet aggregation (72% +/- 8% to 47% +/- 8%, P < .05) and thromboxane B(2) production (41 +/- 12 to 14 +/- 5 pg/mL, P < .05). In conclusion, our results indicate that short-term administration of celecoxib does not impair platelet and renal function and the response to diuretics in decompensated cirrhosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term safety of this drug in cirrhosis.     

Renal effects of ibopamine in comparison with furosemide in patients with mild heart failure

Ibopamine is a novel oral dopamine analogue with positive inotropy and diuretic effects. In a double-blind, randomized study, the drug was investigated in 10 patients (mean age 49 +/- 10 years, six male, four female) with mild heart failure (NYHA classes II: six patients, III: four patients). Effects of single oral doses of 200 mg ibopamine, of 40 mg furosemide, and of 200 mg ibopamine plus 40 mg furosemide were compared in each patient at 3-day-intervals. One h after application, systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased from 119 +/- 11 to 124 +/- 8, and from 75 +/- 4 to 80 +/- 6 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) in the ibopamine group, while changes in both other groups and changes of the heart rate were insignificant. During 2 h after drug ingestion urinary flow was raised from 124 +/- 81 to 227 +/- 166 ml/2 h in the ibopamine group (p less than 0.05), while the application of furosemide (with or without ibopamine) resulted in several fold increases of urinary flow. After ibopamine, the 2-h-creatinine-clearance rose from 123 +/- 73 to 130 +/- 85 ml/min (not significant). Sodium excretion remained unchanged by ibopamine, potassium excretion was increased from 2.9 +/- 1.7 to 4.0 +/- 3.3 mmol/h (p less than 0.05), while effects of furosemide were several fold of those of ibopamine. Atrial natriuretic factor concentrations in plasma increased significantly after ibopamine and after ibopamine plus furosemide (p less than 0.01), but remained constant after furosemide alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The fasting B6 vitamer profile and response to a pyridoxine load in normal and cirrhotic subjects

This study established the fasting plasma and urine profiles of vitamin B6 in cirrhotics and assessed the response to an oral dose of pyridoxine. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to measure all vitameric coenzymatic and degradatory forms. In 31 patients with cirrhosis and 15 healthy controls, fasting plasma and 24-hr urine collection showed: plasma pyridoxal-5'-phosphate, the biologically active form, was significantly (p less than 0.001) reduced in cirrhotics (mean +/- S.D.: 5.7 +/- 3.2 ng per ml) compared to normals (14.2 +/- 7.5 ng per ml); plasma pyridoxal was detected in more cirrhotics (48%) than normals (28%); pyridoxic acid, the end catabolite, was significantly (p less than 0.05) lower in plasma of cirrhotics compared to normals, but 24-hr urine excretion was not different. Administration of 25 mg of pyridoxine to 7 cirrhotics and 5 normals showed the following plasma changes: pyridoxine rapidly peaked at 30 min and was totally cleared from plasma by 3 hr; plasma pyridoxal and pyridoxic acid increased in parallel up to 40-fold over baseline by 1 to 2 hr and rapidly fell toward baseline by 8 hr, and plasma pyridoxal-5'-phosphate, in contrast, increased significantly (p less than 0.05) from baseline by 60 min and was maintained above normal for 24 hr. The area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC) for pyridoxal-5'-phosphate was significantly (p less than 0.05) less for the cirrhotics than normals and showed a significant negative correlation to hepatocyte function and blood flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and renin-aldosterone in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: basal levels, changes during daily activity and nocturnal diuresis.

Measurements of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations at 8 AM showed raised levels in 21 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (10.5 +/- 0.8 pmol/L) compared with levels in 10 age-matched controls (4.1 +/- 0.64 pmol/L; p less than 0.0001). In eight patients and 10 controls, atrial natriuretic peptide, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone and urinary sodium excretion were measured every 4 hr for 24 hr. Subjects were mobile between 8 AM and 11 PM and supine from 11 PM to 8 AM. In controls, urinary sodium excretion was highest between 4 PM and 11 PM (19.34 +/- 3.74 mumol/min) and lowest between midnight and 8 AM (7.06 +/- 1.23 mumol/min; p less than 0.001). In patients, urinary sodium excretion was 0.63 +/- 0.14 mumol/min between 4 PM and midnight and 1.85 +/- 0.71 mumol/min (p less than 0.08) between midnight and 8 AM. In patients during the day, mean plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentration did not change despite large individual variation, but large, sustained rises in plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone were seen. Correlations were noted between atrial natriuretic peptide and urinary sodium excretion between midnight and 8 AM (r = 0.65; p less than 0.02) and 4 PM and midnight (r = 0.54; p less than 0.05) but not between 8 AM and 4 PM. Plasma renin activity dropped from 12.54 +/- 2.49 at midnight to 7.41 +/- 0.88 pmol/hr/ml at 8 AM (p less than 0.05); plasma aldosterone decreased from 1,032 +/- 101 to 798 +/- 56 pmol/L (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Atrial natriuretic factor in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites. Effect of large-volume paracentesis

The plasma levels of atrial natriuretic factor in liver cirrhosis can be affected by various factors, such as ascites, renal function, use of diuretics drugs and dietary sodium intake. Moreover, the influence of high intra-abdominal pressure on cardiac atrial natriuretic factor release in patients with tense ascites has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the circulating levels of atrial natriuretic factor and their relationships to plasma renin activity, aldosterone concentration, and urinary sodium excretion in 45 cirrhotic patients divided into 4 groups: (a) cirrhotics without ascites; (b) nonazotemic cirrhotics with ascites; (c) cirrhotics with ascites and functional renal failure; and (d) cirrhotics with ascites taking diuretics. In some patients with tense ascites, atrial natriuretic factor was also measured after rapid abdominal relaxation by large volume paracentesis. Plasma levels of atrial natriuretic factor obtained in 13 healthy control subjects after 5 days on a 40-50 mEq sodium daily intake were 22.8 +/- 3.3 pg/ml. Mean plasma atrial natriuretic factor levels were normal in patients without ascites (35.1 +/- 11.4 pg/ml) and in those with ascites taking diuretics (27 +/- 9.2 pg/ml), but elevated in patients with ascites not taking diuretics (59.6 +/- 12 pg/ml) and in those with ascites and functional renal failure (58.5 +/- 16.6 pg/ml). These data show that plasma atrial natriuretic factor levels are elevated only in cirrhotic patients who are ascitic and not taking diuretics. In these patients atrial natriuretic factor levels were directly correlated with urinary sodium excretion, even though sodium balance was positive. This could be the consequence of the contrasting effects of antinatriuretic factors, as suggested by the inverse relationships between atrial natriuretic factor and urinary sodium on the one hand and plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration on the other. Twenty-six patients with tense ascites (12 taking diuretics and 14 not) were treated with rapid large-volume paracentesis (6500 +/- 330 ml of ascitic fluid removed in 168 +/- 16 min). At the end of the procedure, plasma atrial natriuretic factor levels had increased in all patients (from 45.5 +/- 10.1 to 100 +/- 17 pg/ml), whereas plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration had decreased (from 10.3 +/- 1.6 to 7 +/- 1.3 ng/ml/h, and 1160 +/- 197 to 781 +/- 155 pg/ml, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Enhanced Renin Levels After Discontinuation of Furosemide: Additional Effects of Loop Diuretics on Renin Release

The rate of recovery of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis after stopping diuretic administration was examined in 18 male patients with essential hypertension. Upright plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone (PA) were measured during sodium restriction (10 mEq sodium intake), after three days of furosemide administration (40 mg BID po) and for five days following cessation of the diuretic. After diuretic administration, the mean PRA level (8.2±1.7 ng/ml/hr) was significantly elevated compared to the level on low sodium diet (4.2±0.5 ng/ml/hr). However, the major finding was that PRA levels continued to increase significantly compared to levels during diuresis on days 1 (11.8±1.7 ng/ml/hr) and 2 (10.8±1.5 ng/ml/hr) of the postdiuretic period. Mean PA values paralleled PRA responses in the study. Infusion of normal saline on postdiuretic day 1 failed to suppress PRA to levels seen in subjects not receiving diuretics. The postdiuretic period was accompanied by increased urinary sodium reabsorption and decreased urinary potassium excretion and by significant decreases in creatinine, PAH and free water clearance. The mechanism of this sustained renin response several days after cessation of diuretic therapy may be best explained by a prolonged action of furosemide or by partial ongoing volume depletion with reduced sodium load to the distal nephron. Since all patients demonstrated a marked and consistent PRA response after diuretic withdrawal, this time period represents a potent stimulatory challenge for monitering renin responses.