The different ablation effects on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with and without dual nodal pathways

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in adults have shown a significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) after successful slow pathway ablation. However, information on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in children is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the different effects of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in pediatric AVNRT patients between those with and without dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways. METHODS: From January 1992 to August 2004, a total 67 pediatric patients with AVNRT underwent an electrophysiologic study and RF catheter ablation at our institution. We compared the electrophysiologic characteristics between those obtained before and after ablation in the children with AVNRT with and without dual AV nodal pathways. RESULTS: Dual AV nodal pathways were found in 37 (55%) of 67 children, including 36 (54%) with antegrade and 10 (15%) with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The antegrade and retrograde fast pathway ERPs in children with dual AV nodal pathways were both longer than the antegrade and retrograde ERPs in children without dual AV nodal pathways (300 +/- 68 vs 264 +/- 58 ms, P = 0.004; 415 +/- 70 vs 250 +/- 45 ms, P < 0.001) before ablation. In children with antegrade dual AV nodal pathways, the antegrade fast pathway ERP decreased from 300 +/- 68 ms to 258 +/- 62 ms (P = 0.008). The retrograde fast pathway ERP also decreased after successful ablation in the children with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways (415 +/- 70 vs. 358 +/- 72 ms, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: The dual AV nodal physiology could not be commonly demonstrated in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT. After a successful slow pathway ablation, the fast pathway ERP shortened significantly in the children with dual AV nodal pathways.     

Effects of Pharmacological Autonomic Blockade on Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathways Physiology in Patients with Slow-Fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

The purpose of this study was to investigate the atrioventricular AV nodal physiology and the inducibility of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) under pharmacological autonomic blockade (AB). Seventeen consecutive patients (6 men and 11 women, mean age 39 ± 17 years) with clinical recurrent slow-fast AVNRT received electrophysiological study before and after pharmacological AB with atropine (0.04 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.2 mg/kg). In baseline, all 17 patients could be induced with AVNRT, 5 were isoproterenol-dependent. After pharmacological AB, 12 (71 %) of 17 patients still demonstrated AV nodal duality. AVNRT became noninducible in 7 of 12 nonisoproterenol dependent patients and remained noninducible in all 5 isoproterenol dependent patients. The sinus cycle length (801 ± 105 ms vs 630 ± 80 ms, P < 0.005) and AV blocking cycle length (365 ± 64 ms vs 338 ± 61 ms, P < 0.005) became shorter after AB. The antegrade effective refractory period and functional refractory period of the fast pathway (369 ± 67 ms vs 305 ± 73 ms, P < 0.005; 408 ± 56 ms vs 350 ± 62 ms, P < 0.005) and the slow pathway (271 ± 30 ms vs 258 ± 27 ms, P < 0.01; 344 ± 60 ms vs 295 ± 50 ms, P < 0.005) likewise became significantly shortened. However, the ventriculoatrial blocking cycle length (349 ± 94 ms vs 326 ± 89 ms, NS) and effective refractory period of retrograde fast pathway (228 ± 38 ms vs 240 ± 80 ms, NS) remained unchanged after autonomic blockade. Pharmacological AB unveiling the intrinsic AV nodal physiology could result in the masking of AV nodal duality and the decreased inducibility of clinical AVNRT.     

Radiofrequency ablation of probable atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with documented supraventricular tachycardia without inducible tachycardia

The reproducible induction of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) during electrophysiological study is critical for the diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), and for determining a therapeutic endpoint for catheter ablation. In the sedated state, there are patients with reentry SVT due to AVNRT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. This article reports on the empiric slow pathway modification for AVNRT in six pediatric patients (age 6-17, mean 13.3 years) with documented, recurrent, paroxysmal SVT in the setting of a structurally normal heart who were not inducible at electrophysiological study. Atrial and ventricular burst and extrastimulus pacing at multiple drive cycle lengths were performed in the baseline state, during an isuprel infusion, and during isuprel elimination. Single AV nodal (AVN) echo beats were present in all patients, while classic dual AVN physiology was present in three of six patients. Radiofrequency energy was administered in the right posteroseptal AV groove resulting in accelerated junctional rhythm in five of six patients. Postablation testing demonstrated the elimination of echo beats in four patients, while dual AVN physiology and echo beats persisted in two patients. At follow-up (22-49 months, mean 29.5 months), all patients are asymptomatic without recurrence of SVT and are not taking any antiarrhythmic medication. In selected patients, empiric slow pathway modification may be offered as a potential cure in children with recurrent paroxysmal SVT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. Elimination of slow pathway conduction may serve as a surrogate endpoint, though is not necessary for long-term success.     

Electrophysiology of inducible atrial flutter in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

An association between atrial flutter and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) has been observed, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined. This issue was therefore investigated by comparing the electrophysiological properties of AVNRT patients with and without inducible atrial flutter and those of patients with a history of flutter. Twenty-nine patients with clinically documented atrial flutter and 104 with AVNRT were studied. Atrial flutter was induced in 38 (37%) AVNRT patients during standardized electrophysiological testing before radiofrequency ablation. The atrial relative refractory periods in AVNRT patients with inducible flutter (260 +/- 30 ms) were significantly shorter than those of either patients with a history of flutter (282 +/- 30 ms; P = 0.02) or AVNRT patients without inducible flutter (284 +/- 38 ms; P = 0.006). The atrial effective refractory periods in AVNRT patients with inducible flutter (205 +/- 31 ms) were shorter than in AVNRT patients without inducible flutter (227 +/- 40 ms; P = 0.01). The maximum AH interval during premature atrial stimulation in patients with clinical flutter (239 +/- 94 ms) was shorter than in AVNRT patients either with (290 +/- 91 ms; P = 0.04) or without inducible flutter (313 +/- 101 ms; P = 0.002). However, no significant differences were found in the maximum AH interval achieved during incremental atrial pacing among different groups. Our data show that a non-clinical flutter could more often be induced in those who had short atrial refractoriness. Despite their anatomical proximity, the slow pathway conduction of AVNRT and the isthmus slow conduction of flutter may be related to different mechanisms.     

The electrophysiological characteristics in patients with ventricular stimulation inducible fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. METHODS: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%). RESULTS: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.     

Cryoablation for Presumed Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients

Background: Little data exist on the outcomes of cryoablation for the treatment of presumptive atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in a pediatric population. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing cryoablation from January 2006 to October 2010 for presumed AVNRT at the Children's Hospital Colorado. Inclusion criteria were age ≤ 18, normal heart structure, no prior ablation procedures, documented narrow complex tachycardia, and no inducible tachycardia or other tachycardia mechanisms during electrophysiology study. Results: Thirteen patients underwent cryoablation for presumed AVNRT. Cryoablation catheter tip size varied from 4 to 8 mm with a median of eight cryoablation lesions. Isoproterenol was utilized preablation in 54% and none postablation. Procedural endpoints, per written report, were loss of sustained slow pathway, change in Wenckebach cycle length, and no specific endpoint. Procedural endpoints, per measured data, were a decrease in patients exhibiting sustained slow pathway conduction. Maximum atrial‐His (AH) interval with atrial overdrive pacing was reduced from 266 ms preablation to 167 ms postablation, p = 0.006. The number of patients with an AH jump was reduced from 6 to 2. After follow‐up of 13.8 ± 14.3 months, 23% (3/13) had documented tachycardia recurrence. No statistical significance was determined when comparing electrophysiology testing parameters pre‐ and postablation among the group with recurrence versus the group without recurrence. Conclusions: Cryoablation can be considered as a safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of presumed AVNRT among pediatric patients, albeit with a recurrence rate of 23%. (PACE 2012; 35:1319–1325)     

Entrainment to Distinguish Orthodromic Reciprocating Tachycardia from Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia in Children

Background : Studies in adults suggest that after entrainment from the right ventricle, a post‐pacing interval (PPI) minus tachycardia cycle length (TCL), when corrected for atrioventricular node delay (cPPI‐TCL), is useful to distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT), but this has not been evaluated in children. Methods : In 100 children undergoing catheter ablation, entrainment of ORT or AVNRT was performed from the right ventricular apex. The atrial‐His (AH) interval was measured on the return cycle (post‐AH) and during tachycardia just prior to pacing (pre‐AH). The cPPI‐TCL was calculated as (PPI‐TCL) ? (post‐AH ? pre‐AH). In the first 50 children, the best cutoff was identified and then validated in the next 50 children. Results : In the first 50 children, cPPI‐TCL was longer in AVNRT compared with ORT (122 ± 19 ms vs 63 ± 23 ms, P < 0.001). Furthermore, cPPI‐TCL exceeded 95 ms in all AVNRT patients, but was less than < 95 ms in 28 of 29 ORT patients. In the next 50 children, a cPPI‐TCL < 95 ms was 100% specific for ORT; a cPPI‐TCL > 95 ms was 95% specific for AVNRT. There was even greater separation of cPPI‐TCL values comparing AVNRT with ORT utilizing a septal accessory pathway. Conclusions : The cPPI‐TCL is a useful technique to distinguish AVNRT from ORT in children. Our data suggest that in children a cPPI‐TCL < 95 ms excludes AVNRT, while a value > 95 ms is rarely observed in ORT. This technique is particularly useful to distinguish AVNRT from ORT utilizing a septal accessory pathway. (PACE 2010; 469–474)     

Determination of Repetitive Slow Pathway Conduction for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT

LUKAC, P., et al.: Determination of Repetitive Slow Pathway Conduction for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT. Aims: To determine whether the loss of repetitive slow pathway conduction identifies a successful radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). Methods and results: Thirty nine consecutive patients undergoing ablation of AVNRT using the slow pathway approach were included. At baseline and after each radiofrequency application with an episode of junctional rhythm, repetitive slow pathway conduction was assessed as follows: Effective refractory period of the fast pathway was determined. The coupling interval of the first atrial extrastimulus (A2) was set at 30 ms below the effective refractory period of the fast pathway to ensure its conduction via the slow pathway. The second atrial extrastimulus (A3) was introduced at progressively longer coupling intervals starting from 200 ms until: (1) it propagated to the His bundle or (2) an anterogradely blocked AV nodal echo of A2 appeared before a conducted A3 depolarized the atrium in the His bundle electrogram. The response was termed repetitive slow pathway conduction if A3 was conducted with an   AH > 200 ms   . Application was considered successful if no AVNRT could be induced. Repetitive slow pathway conduction was present after 1 of 39 successful and after 34 of 40 ineffective applications   (P < 0.0001)   . Repetitive slow pathway conduction identified a successful application with 97% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 86% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value. Conclusion: The presence of repetitive slow pathway conduction identifies an unsuccessful application with a clinically meaningful negative predictive value. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:827–835)     

Variable Effects of Adenosine on Retrograde Conduction in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia

Adenosine has been demonstrated to reliably produce transient block of atrioventricular nodal (AVN) conduction, and has been advocated as a method of differentiating retrograde conduction via the atrioventricular node from accessory pathway conduction. However, the response of retrograde AVN to adenosine in patients with typical atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) remains unclear. We evaluated 13 patients (mean age 45 ± 20 years) with typical AVNRT prior to AVN modification. During right ventricular pacing, a rapid bolus of adenosine (0.2 mg/kg; maximum 18 mg) was administered. Adenosine sensitivity, defined by transient ventriculoatrial block, was observed in six patients, while in seven patients ventriculoatrial conduction was unaffected. An adenosine bolus administered during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing resulted in antegrade atrioventricular block in all the adenosine resistant patients in whom this was performed (n = 6). Comparisons of AVN electrophysiological characteristics between the adenosine sensitive and adenosine resistant patients were performed. There was no difference with respect to ventriculoatrial effective refractory period, ventriculoatrial Wenckebach, AVNRT cycle length, and His to atrial echo interval in AVNRT. However, there was a trend toward a longer antegrade fast pathway ERP in the adenosine sensitive group (P = 0.07). Electrophysiological properties do not predict retrograde AVN adenosine sensitivity. Adenosine does not cause retrograde AVN block in all patients with AVNRT, and therefore cannot reliably distinguish between retrograde conduction via the AVN or an accessory pathway.     

Sustained Slow Pathway Conduction: Superior to Dual Atrioventricular Node Physiology in Young Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia?

BACKGROUND: Young patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) frequently do not display discrete dual AV node physiology (DAVNP) as classically defined. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence of sustained slow pathway conduction (SSPC; PR > RR during atrial pacing) in young patients with AVNRT and compare it to dual atrioventricular node physiology. METHODS: The presence of SSPC and DAVNP was prospectively assessed before and after radiofrequency catheter ablation in 61 young patients (age 4-23 years) with typical AVNRT. RESULTS: Prior to ablation, 32 (52%) displayed DAVNP, while 46 (75%) displayed SSPC; 7 patients (11%) had neither marker. Patients with DAVNP were older than those without (15 +/- 3 vs 13 +/- 4, P = 0.027) and the prevalence increased with age (38% <13 years, 50% 13-15, 70% >15, P = 0.041), while SSPC showed no age predilection. Patients under 13 years displayed SSPC more commonly than DAVNP (81% vs 38%, P = 0.004). DAVNP persisted after ablation in 10/32 (31%) patients, compared to 6/46 (13%) with persistent SSPC after ablation. The ability to use loss of the marker (present before, absent after ablation) as a surrogate for successful ablation was greater for SSPC than for DAVNP (66% vs 36%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: SSPC is more common than DAVNP in young patients with AVNRT. SSPC is eliminated more frequently than DAVNP after acutely successful ablation, and appears to be a better indicator of the substrate for AVNRT. Elimination of SSPC may serve as a useful surrogate endpoint for slow pathway ablation.     

Incidental dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in children and adolescents: clinical follow-up and implications

Background: Dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology is a substrate for the development of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the risk of developing AVNRT in patients with dual AV nodal physiology is not known. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk of developing AVNRT in children and adolescents with incidental findings of dual AV nodal physiology after accessory pathway ablation. Methods: This is a single center retrospective study of patients who underwent intracardiac electrophysiology study at The Children's Hospital, Denver, from March 1993 to August 2008, with findings of dual AV nodal physiology after successful ablation of an accessory pathway. Follow‐up was obtained by chart review with the primary outcome of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia. Extended clinical follow‐up was also achieved through phone contact with patients or parents of patients. Results: Mean age at initial electrophysiology study was 12.8 years (±3.7 years). Follow‐up was obtained on all 66 patients for a mean duration of 3.1 years (±2.8 years). Mean age at follow‐up was 15.8 years (±4.6 years). Recurrent supraventricular tachycardia occurred in nine of the 66 patients (13.6%). AVNRT was induced in two of the 66 patients (3.0%). Conclusion: This study supports the hypothesis that incidental dual AV nodal physiology does not predict AVNRT in children and adolescents with after successful accessory pathway ablation. (PACE 2010; 33:1528–1532)     

Electrophysiological characteristics of junctional rhythm during ablation of the slow pathway in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation in children with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

BACKGROUND: The majority of cardiac arrhythmias in children are supraventricular tachycardia, which is mainly related to an accessory pathway (AP)-mediated reentry mechanism. The investigation for Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome in adults is numerous, but there is only limited information for children. This study was designed to evaluate the specific electrophysiologic characteristics and the outcome of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in children with WPW syndrome. METHODS: From December 1989 to August 2005, a total of 142 children and 1,219 adults with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) who underwent ablation at our institution were included. We compared the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics between children and adults with WPW syndrome. RESULTS: The incidence of intermittent WPW syndrome was higher in children (7% vs 3%, P=0.025). There was a higher occurrence of rapid atrial pacing needed to induce tachycardia in children (67% vs 53%, P=0.02). However, atrial fibrillation (AF) occurred more commonly in adult patients (28% vs 16%, P=0.003). The pediatric patients had a higher incidence of multiple pathways (5% vs 1%, P<0.001).Both the onset and duration of symptoms were significantly shorter in the pediatric patients. The antegrade 1:1 AP conduction pacing cycle length (CL) and antegrade AP effective refractory period (ERP) in children were much shorter than those in adults with manifest WPW syndrome. Furthermore, the retrograde 1:1 AP conduction pacing CL and retrograde AP ERP in children were also shorter than those in adults. The antegrade 1:1 atrioventricular (AV) node conduction pacing CL, AV nodal ERP, and the CL of the tachycardia were all shorter in the pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the difference in the electrophysiologic characteristics of APs and the AV node between pediatric and adult patients. RF catheter ablation was a safe and effective method to manage children with WPW syndrome.     

Differential Entrainment Distinguishes Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia from Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia

Background: Entrainment from the right ventricular (RV) apex and the base has been used to distinguish atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). The difference in the entrainment response from the RV apex in comparison with the RV base has not been tested. Methods: Fifty‐nine consecutive patients referred for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were included. Entrainment of SVT was performed from the RV apex and base, pacing at 10–40‐ms faster than the tachycardia cycle length. SA interval was calculated from stimulus to earliest atrial electrogram. Ventricle to atrium (VA) interval was measured from the RV electrogram (apex and base) to the earliest atrial electrogram during tachycardia. The SA‐VA interval from apex and base was measured and the difference between them was calculated. Results: Thirty‐six AVNRT and 23 AVRT patients were enrolled. Mean age was 44 ± 12 years; 52% were male. The [SA‐VA]apex–[SA‐VA]base was demonstrable in 84.7% of patients and measured ?9.4 ± 6.6 in AVNRT and 10 ± 11.3 in AVRT, P < 0.001. The difference was negative for all AVNRT cases and positive for all septal accessory pathways (APs). Conclusion: The difference between entrainment from the apex and base is readily performed and is diagnostic for all AVNRTs and septal APs. (PACE 2010; 1335–1341)     

Spontaneous Accelerated Junctional Rhythm: An Unusual but Useful Observation Prior to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia in Young Patients

Between May 1990 and March 1995, 5 of 29 young patients (ages 4.2–25 years; median 14.1 years) undergoing RF ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) presented with spontaneous accelerated junctional rhythm (AJR) (CL = 500–750 ms), compared to 0 of 58 age matched controls undergoing RF ablation for a concealed AV accessory pathway (P = 0.004). In 3 of the 5 patients with AVNRT and AJR, junctional beats served as a trigger for reentry. During attempted slow pathway modification in the five patients with AVNRT and AJR, AVNRT continued to be inducible until the AJR was entirely eliminated or dramatically slowed. These 5 patients are tachycardia-free in followup (median 15 months; range 6–31 months) with only 1 of the 5 patients continuing to experience episodic AJR at rates slower than observed preablation. Episodic spontaneous AJR is statistically associated with AVNRT in young patients and can serve as a trigger for reentry. Successful modification of slow pathway conduction may be predicted by the elimination of AJR or its modulation to slower rates, suggesting that the rhythm is secondary to enhanced automaticity arising near or within the slow pathway.     

Effects of a blocked atrial beat on the atrioventricular nodal recovery property in patients with dual nodal pathways

Dual AVN physiology can be demonstrated by a variety of maneuvers. To determine whether AVN recovery times following a blocked extrastimulus facilitate or obscure detection of dual AVN physiology, 11 patients (9-17 years) were studied with dual AVN pathways by using single and double atrial extrastimuli. With a single atrial extrastimuli, the premature atrial stimulus (A2) was coupled to basic atrial beats (A1). The fast and slow AVN recovery curves were constructed with plots of the nodal conduction time against the recovery time (A1A2,A2H2). With double atrial extrastimuli, a fixed blocked A2 beat (A2B) was followed by a scanning atrial beat (A3). The nodal recovery property post-A2B was studied by plots of A2BA3,A3H3. In all patients the recovery curve of the fast pathway post-A2B had a leftward shift when compared to that of the pre-A2B curve (i.e., the AH was shortened at the same recovery time). The window of slow pathway conduction post-A2B disappeared totally in five patients and decreased significantly in six patients (post-A2B: 26 +/- 42 ms; pre-A2B: 80 +/- 65 ms, P < 0.05). In the six patients that still had slow pathway conduction post-A2B, the slow pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was significantly less than that of pre-A2B (215 +/- 38 vs 268 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05). The fast pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was also diminished significantly (235 +/- 62 vs 357 +/- 76 ms, P < 0.0001). The authors conclude that blocked atrial beats decrease the visibility of the slow pathway conduction.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with multiple AH jumps: electrophysiological characteristics and radiofrequency ablation

This article describes the additional use of incremental atrial burst pacing (A1A1) and double atrial extrastimulation with a predefined fast pathway conducted A2 (A1A2A3), rather than single atrial extrastimulation (A1A2) only, to characterize typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The authors noted an additional 32% of patients had multiple anterograde AV nodal physiology demonstrated when A1A1 or A1A2A3 protocols were deployed compared to more conventional A1A2 protocols. The A2H2max (449 +/- 147 vs 339 +/- 94 ms) and A3H3max (481 +/- 120 vs 389 +/- 85 ms) were higher in 31 patients where multiple jumps in the AV nodal conduction curve were obtained (group 1) compared to 192 patients where only single jump was obtained (group 2) (both P < 0.01). Postablation, the degree of reduction of A2H2max (49%) and A3H3max (50%) in group 1 was greater than in group 2 (38% and 42%, respectively, P < 0.05). In seven of group 1 patients in whom A1A2A3 stimulation was required to reveal multiple jumps, the A2H2max remained unchanged after ablation (237 +/- 89 vs 214 +/- 59, P > 0.05). A3H3max was the only parameter that shortened significantly after ablation. Generally, successful ablation resulted in loss of multiple discontinuities in A1A1/A1H1 or A2A3/A3H3 curves. In conclusion, a combination of A1A2, A1A1, and A1A2A3 are required to fully elucidate AVNRT. Significant shortening of AHmax or loss of multiple jumps after ablation indicates successful elimination of AVNRT in these patients.     

Decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing protocol for the induction of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and other supraventricular tachycardias

AIM: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing protocol (PRTCL) for induction of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), and other supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs), compared to standard (STD) methods. METHODS: The study cohort of 121 patients (age 57.51 +/- 14.02 years) who presented with documented SVTs and/or symptoms of palpitations and dizziness, and underwent invasive electrophysiological evaluation was divided into Group I (AVNRT, n = 42) and Group II (Control, n = 79). The PRTCL involved a train of six atrial extrastimuli, delivered in a decremental ramp fashion. The STD methods included continuous burst and rapid incremental pacing up to atrioventricular (AV) block cycle length, and single and occasionally double atrial extrastimuli. Prolongation in the Atrio-Hisian (Delta-AH) intervals achieved by both methods were compared, as were induction frequencies. RESULTS: In Group I, three categories of responses--(1) induction of AVNRT, (2) induction of echo beats only, and (3) none--were observed in 29 (69%), 11 (26%), and 2 (5%) patients with the PRTCL, when compared with 14 (33%), 16 (38%), and 12 (29%) patients with STD methods in the baseline state without the use of pharmacological agents. The Delta-AH intervals for each of these three categories were larger using PRTCL versus STD methods; 293.3 +/- 95.2 ms versus 192.9 +/- 61.4 ms (P < 0.005), 308.6 +/- 68.5 ms versus 189. 9 +/- 64.9 ms (P < 0.0005), and 203.0 +/- 86.3 ms versus 145.8 +/- 58.9 ms (P = NS), respectively. In Group II, in one patient with dual AV nodal physiology but no clinical tachycardia, the PRTCL induced nonsustained (12 beats) AVNRT. Additionally, in this group, both PRTCL and STD methods induced atrial tachycardia in two patients and orthodromic AV re-entrant tachycardia in one patient. CONCLUSION: Decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing PRTCL demonstrates a superior response for induction of typical AVNRT as compared to STD techniques. Because of easy and reliable induction of AVNRT and echo beats by the PRTCL, we recommend it as a method to increase the likelihood of induction of AVNRT. For induction of other SVTs, the PRTCL and the STD methods are comparable.     

Mapping and Ablation of Atypical AVNRT from the Morphologic Left Atrium in a Patient with Dextrocardia and Situs Inversus

A 75‐year‐old woman with dextrocardia, situs inversus, and subpulmonic outflow obstruction presented with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). This SVT was easily inducible during electrophysiology study, and pacing maneuvers during SVT were consistent with atypical, slow‐slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The His bundle was identified in the low postero‐septal morphologic right atrium, at the typical anatomic site for slow pathway ablation of AVNRT. Mapping of the retrograde earliest atrial electrogram during AVNRT localized this site to the mid‐septal morphologic left atrium, and cryoablation at this site terminated the AVNRT and rendered it noninducible. (PACE 2010; e106–e109)     

Slow pathway ablation decreases vulnerability to pacing-induced atrial fibrillation: Possible role of vagal denervation

BACKGROUND: Studies indicate that success of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) may be in part due to vagal denervation. RFAof supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has been associated with vagal denervation. The effects of slow pathway (SP) ablation on AF inducibility have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that SP ablation renders AF less inducible. Methods: Consecutive patients referred for SVT were studied. After atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) was confirmed they underwent induction of AF. After SP ablation AF induction was reattempted. Vulnerability to AF was reassessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled; eight were not inducible for AF in the preablative state. Mean CLof the AVNRT was 340 +/- 16 ms. The average RF ablation time was 131 +/- 42 seconds. Presence of junctional rhythm was required. Of the 16 with inducible AF two patients had AF induced during routine invasive electrophysiology study. None of these had inducible AF after SP ablation. Fourteen of 16 patients required specific AF induction. Ten of these were noninducible after SP ablation; two were inducible after SP ablation but with a more aggressive pacing protocol (P < 0.03 compared to preablation) and two had no change in AF vulnerability. Seven of the eight noninducible patients remained noninducible for AF post SP ablation. In the 12 patients who were inducible prior but noninducible after ablation the mean atrial effective refractory period (AERP) increased for both BCL at 400 and 600 ms (400/216 +/- 8 ms preablation vs 400/248 +/- 12 ms postablation, P < 0.03; 600/228 +/- 8 ms preablation vs 600/259 +/- 6 ms postablation, P < 0.04). There were no significant changes in AERP of patients who remained inducible or who were noninducible before ablation. The average ablation time for patients who became noninducible after ablation was significantly higher than those who had no change in inducibility or remained inducible but at a more aggressive pacing threshold (157 +/- 24 seconds vs 35 +/- 5 seconds; P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: SP ablation acutely decreases vulnerability to pacing-induced AF in patients with AVNRT. This may reflect the effect of ablation on atrial vagal tone.